• <tr id="yyy80"></tr>
  • <sup id="yyy80"></sup>
  • <tfoot id="yyy80"><noscript id="yyy80"></noscript></tfoot>
  • 99热精品在线国产_美女午夜性视频免费_国产精品国产高清国产av_av欧美777_自拍偷自拍亚洲精品老妇_亚洲熟女精品中文字幕_www日本黄色视频网_国产精品野战在线观看 ?

    Support Effects on Thiophene Hydrodesulfurization over Co-Mo-Ni/Al2O3and Co-Mo-Ni/TiO2-Al2O3Catalysts*

    2014-07-18 11:56:14劉超,周志明,黃永利
    關(guān)鍵詞:劉超永利

    Support Effects on Thiophene Hydrodesulfurization over Co-Mo-Ni/Al2O3and Co-Mo-Ni/TiO2-Al2O3Catalysts*

    LIU Chao (劉超), ZHOU Zhiming (周志明)**, HUANG Yongli (黃永利), CHENG Zhenmin (程振民) and YUAN Weikang (袁渭康)
    State Key Laboratory of Chemical Engineering, East China University of Science and Technology, Shanghai 200237, China

    Hierarchically macro-/mesoporous structured Al2O3and TiO2-Al2O3materials were used as supports to prepare novel Co-Mo-Ni hydrodesulfurization (HDS) catalysts. A commercial Co-Mo-Ni/Al2O3catalyst without macroporous channels was taken as a reference. The catalysts were characterized by scanning electron microscope (SEM), transmission electron microscope (TEM), energy-dispersive spectrometry (EDS), N2adsorption-desorption, X-ray diffraction (XRD), and temperature programmed reduction (TPR). The apparent activities of the hierarchically porous catalysts for thiophene HDS were superior to those of the commercial catalyst, which was mainly ascribed to the diffusion-enhanced effect of the hierarchically bimodal pore structure. The addition of titania to alumina in the support helped to weaken the interaction between the active phase and the support, and as a result, the novel Co-Mo-Ni/TiO2-Al2O3catalyst with a low titania loading (28%, by mass) in the support exhibited high HDS activities, even without presulfiding treatment. However, the catalyst with a high titania loading (61%, by mass) showed much lower activities, which was mostly caused by its low surface area and pore volume as well as the non-uniform distribution of titania and alumina. The kinetic analysis further demonstrated the support effects on HDS activities of the catalysts.

    hydrodesulfurization, support, hierarchically macro-/mesoporous structure, Al2O3, TiO2-Al2O3

    1 INTRODUCTION

    In the last two decades, increasing awareness of the effect of environmental pollution by automobiles and resultant stringent legislation for fuel quality in many countries have spurred considerable research efforts in sulfur removal from gasoline and diesel fractions through hydrodesulfurization (HDS) processes [1]. Among these research catalyst support plays an important role [2]. Although the most widely used commercial HDS catalysts have up to now been alumina-supported molybdenum promoted with cobalt or nickel, many investigations have been carried out to modify alumina or explore other supports in order to improve catalyst activity [2, 3]. The pore structure of support and the interaction between support and active phase are two important factors influencing the HDS performance of catalysts [4].

    The commonly used alumina support possesses a unimodal mesopore size distribution, and such a pore structure unavoidably brings up problems such as mass transfer limitations of large sulfur-containing molecules from the outer catalyst surface to the active sites on inner surface. Our previous work proved that the effect of internal diffusion on the overall HDS rate is pronounced for a commercial Co-Mo-Ni/Al2O3catalyst with a mesoporous structure [5, 6]. One of the effective ways to improve the diffusion of large molecules is to substitute for unimodal mesoporous support with bimodal macro-/mesoporous one [7, 8]. Some studies demonstrated that the catalysts with macropores are superior to those without macropores in HDS of thiophene [9], dibenzothiophene [10] and vacuum gasoline [4]. Among many bimodal porous supports, hierarchically porous materials having parallel straight macrochannels with mesoporous walls are of particular interest, and in recent years have attracted much attention from researchers [11-16] due to their multiple applications in catalysis and separation processes [17-23]. Very recently, we prepared a hierarchically porous Co-Mo-Ni/Al2O3catalyst, which showed much higher apparent activity for thiophene HDS than a commercial catalyst [24].

    Compared to Al2O3, TiO2presents a low metal-support interaction and excellent activities. For example, TiO2supported MoS2exhibits HDS activities several times higher than Al2O3supported one [2]. However, the relatively low surface area and the poor thermal stability of active anatase phase make TiO2unsuitable for industrial application [2, 3]. To overcome this problem, TiO2-Al2O3mixed oxides have been used as support to take advantage of beneficial features of both TiO2and Al2O3. Many investigations have showed that TiO2-Al2O3supports are suitable candidates for Al2O3in HDS processes [25-29]. However, almost all works to date are focused on mesoporous TiO2-Al2O3supports, and to the best of our knowledge no relevant results have been reported on hierarchically macro-/mesoporous structured TiO2-Al2O3as HDS catalyst supports. Considering the favorable properties of TiO2-Al2O3and the effective diffusivity of the hierarchically bimodal pore structure,one can speculate that a hierarchically porous TiO2-Al2O3supported molybdenum-nickel (cobalt) will be an ideal HDS catalyst. Recently we prepared a series of hierarchically macro-/mesoporous TiO2-Al2O3mixed oxides with different molar ratio of Ti to Al [15], laying a foundation for application of hierarchically porous TiO2-Al2O3supports to HDS reactions.

    In the present work, novel Co-Mo-Ni catalysts supported on hierarchically macro-/mesoporous structured Al2O3and TiO2-Al2O3are systematically compared with a commercial Co-Mo-Ni catalyst. The comparison is made on physico-chemical properties of the catalysts and their thiophene HDS activities. In addition, a kinetic analysis is performed to evaluate support effects on HDS activities. The aim of this work is to (1) further elucidate the diffusion-enhanced effect of the hierarchically porous catalysts; and (2) understand the effect of titania addition to alumina on HDS activities of the catalysts.

    2 EXPERIMENTAL

    2.1 Catalyst preparation

    The preparation methods for the hierarchically macro-/mesoporous metal oxides (Al2O3and TiO2-Al2O3) were described elsewhere [14, 15, 22]. As for the Co-Mo-Ni catalysts supported on these supports, we recently applied the conventional incipient wetness co-impregnation method to prepare a Co-Mo-Ni/Al2O3catalyst [24]. In the present work this method was further used to prepare two Co-Mo-Ni/TiO2-Al2O3catalysts with different Ti/Al molar ratios, one catalyst with the molar ratio being 0.2/0.8 and the other being 0.5/0.5. The hierarchically porous TiO2-Al2O3supports were calcined at 873 K for 5 h. Both catalysts were obtained by calcination of the impregnated supports at 773 K for 5 h. The detailed procedure for the catalyst preparation was available in our previous work [24]. The metal loading for each catalyst was kept constant (by mass) at about 5% Co, 17% Mo, and 3.5% Ni (determined by energy-dispersive spectrometry).

    For simplicity, the commercial Co-Mo-Ni/Al2O3catalyst was denoted by CoMoNi/A(C), the hierarchically macro-/mesoporous structured Co-Mo-Ni/Al2O3by CoMoNi/A(N), and the hierarchically bimodal porous structured Co-Mo-Ni/TiO2-Al2O3with different Ti/Al molar ratios of 0.2︰0.8 and 0.5︰0.5 by Co-MoNi/T0.2A0.8(N) and CoMoNi/T0.5A0.5(N), respectively. The commercial CoMoNi/A(C) catalyst was supplied by the Chemical Research Institute of Lanzhou Petrochemical Corporation (LY-9802, prepared by impregnating Co, Mo and Ni on γ-Al2O3, with specific surface area of 228 m2·g?1and pore volume of 0.52 cm3·g?1). If the catalysts, e.g., CoMoNi/A(C) and CoMoNi/T0.2A0.8(N), were presulfided with a 1500 μg·g?1CS2in n-hexane (the presulfiding procedure was reported elsewhere [6]), the presulfided catalysts were named CoMoNi/A(C-S) and CoMoNi/T0.2A0.8(N-S), respectively.

    2.2 Catalyst characterization

    Brunauer-Emmett-Teller (BET) surface areas of the catalysts were obtained by N2adsorption measurement at 77 K on a Micromeritics ASAP 2010 instrument, and all samples were degassed at 463 K and 133 Pa for 6 h before analysis. The pore size distribution was determined from the desorption branch of the isotherm by the Barrett-Joyner-Halenda (BJH) method. X-ray diffraction (XRD) patterns were acquired on a Rigaku D/Max 2550 VB/PC diffractometer using a Cu Kα radiation source, and the intensity data were collected over a 2θ range of 10°-80°. The surface morphology was analyzed using a JEOL JSM 6360 LV scanning electron microscope (SEM). The elemental composition of catalyst surface was determined by energy-dispersive spectrometry (EDS, Falcon, EDAX) coupled to the SEM. Transmission electron microscopy (TEM) was recorded on a JEOL JEM 2100 microscope. Temperature programmed reduction (TPR) was performed on a Micromeritics AutoChem 2920 apparatus using 10% H2in Ar with a heating rate of 10 K·min?1up to final temperature of 1173 K, and the consumption of H2was monitored by a thermal conductivity detector (TCD).

    2.3 Reaction tests

    HDS of thiophene over the Co-Mo-Ni supported catalysts was conducted in a fixed-bed reactor (id=10 mm). The liquid feedstock was a mixture of thiophene and n-hexane (used as solvent), and the initial concentration of thiophene was 1500 μg·g?1. Detailed information on the reactor and the experimental procedure as well as the analytical method was reported in the previous study [24].

    Kinetic experiments (45 runs for each type of catalyst) over fine powders (50-75 μm, 0.10 g) or relatively large particles (0.9-2.0 mm, 0.46 g) of the catalysts were carried out in the following experimental conditions: temperature (T) ranging from 543 to 623 K, total pressure (p) from 2.5 to 3.5 MPa, inlet liquid molar flow rate (0LF) from 3.07 to 5.37 mmol·min?1, inlet gas molar flow rate (0GF) from 10.71 to 13.79 mmol·min?1, molar ratio of gas to liquid (R) from 2.0 to 4.5. Preliminary tests had confirmed that the external diffusion limitation was eliminated by using the above flow rate, and that the intraparticle diffusion resistance was ignorable for the intrinsic kinetics by using fine powders (50-75 μm).

    3 RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

    3.1 Physico-chemical characterization

    Figure 1 SEM images of CoMoNi/A(C) (a), CoMoNi/A(N) (b), CoMoNi/T0.2A0.8(N) (c) and CoMoNi/T0.5A0.5(N) (d) catalysts

    Table 1 Textural properties of four catalysts

    Figure 2 N2adsorption-desorption isotherms (a) and pore-size distribution curves (b) of four catalysts■ CoMoNi/A(C); ● CoMoNi/A(N); ▲ CoMoNi/T0.2A0.8(N); ▼ CoMoNi/T0.5A0.5(N)

    The SEM images of four catalysts, i.e., Co-MoNi/A(C), CoMoNi/A(N), CoMoNi/T0.2A0.8(N) and CoMoNi/T0.5A0.5(N), are shown in Fig. 1. Different from the novel catalysts [Figs. 1 (b)-1 (d)] prepared in this work, which possess a parallel array of macroporous channels, the commercial catalyst has no macropores. As listed in Table 1, the average diameter of the macropores for the CoMoNi/A(N) catalyst is 0.50 μm, but this value is increased to 0.90-1.10 μm when titania is added into alumina. It is reasonable because the hierarchically macro-/mesoporous TiO2shows larger macropores after calcination at 773 K [14, 20].

    The N2adsorption-desorption isotherms and the pore-size distribution curves of the above four catalysts are presented in Fig. 2. The textural properties (BET surface area, pore volume and average mesopore size) of these catalysts are summarized in Table 1. All the catalysts exhibit type IV isotherms and mesopore size distribution between 3 nm and 20 nm, indicating mesoporous walls separating the macrochannels for the hierarchically porous structured catalysts. The addition of titania to alumina deceases the mesopore size of the catalysts, which is probably caused by the high proportion of micropores in the pure titania sample [20]. Note that the surface area and the pore volume of the CoMoNi/T0.5A0.5(N) catalyst are smaller thanthose of other catalysts, which can be ascribed to the increased amount of titania in the support [15, 26].

    Figure 3 shows the XRD patterns of different catalysts. Both the commercial CoMoNi/A(C) and the hierarchically porous CoMoNi/A(N) exhibit diffraction peaks (2θ=37°, 46°, 67°) belonging to the γ-Al2O3phase (JCPDS 10-0425). The CoMoNi/T0.2A0.8(N) catalyst also contains peaks assigned to γ-Al2O3, but the intensities of these peaks drop as a result of the titania addition. With respect to the CoMoNi/T0.5A0.5(N) catalyst, the γ-Al2O3crystalline peaks become much weaker owing to more titania added into the catalyst. In addition, CoMoNi/T0.5A0.5(N) displays a diffraction peak (2θ=25°) corresponding to the anatase phase (JCPDS 21-1272). An interesting phenomenon is that no Co or Mo or Ni-containing crystalline peaks are observed for all the catalysts in this work, indicating high dispersion of the active phase or very fine crystallites formed, beyond the detection capability of the XRD technique [30].

    Figure 3 XRD patterns of four catalystsa—CoMoNi/A(C); b—CoMoNi/A(N); c—CoMoNi/T0.2A0.8(N); d—CoMoNi/T0.5A0.5(N)

    The TEM images of the catalysts are displayed in Fig. 4. The CoMoNi/T0.2A0.8(N) catalyst (Fig. 4b) shows similar microstructure with CoMoNi/A(N) (Fig. 4a), implying the uniform distribution of titania and alumina. Further observations show that CoMoNi/ T0.2A0.8(N) has smaller crystallite size than CoMoNi/ A(N), which is consistent with the XRD analysis. In contrast, the microstructure of CoMoNi/T0.5A0.5(N) (Fig. 4c) is quite different from that of CoMoNi/ A(N) or CoMoNi/ T0.2A0.8(N). The spatial segregation between titania and alumina are clearly observed in CoMoNi/T0.5A0.5(N), indicating the non-uniform distribution of titania and alumina in the support. This result is also in accord with XRD and BET analysis, i.e., the presence of the anatase phase and the lower surface area and pore volume for CoMoNi/T0.5A0.5(N). Therefore, from the viewpoint of texture and structure, a small amount of titania in the support (T0.2A0.8) is favorable, which might lead to higher HDS activities.

    The TPR profiles of the catalysts are shown in Fig. 5. For the catalysts without addition of titania (Figs. 5a, 5b), the first peak corresponds to the reduction of octahedral Mo species [26, 31]; the second small peak is due to the reduction of Ni2+species in the tetrahedral coordination [32]; the third peak is assigned to the second stage of reduction of octahedral Mo species and the reduction of the tetrahedral Mo species to lower oxide states [31, 33]. It has been widely accepted that octahedral Mo species are the precursors of the active phase MoS2. In this work, the temperature of the maxima for the first peak of the hierarchically porous structured CoMoNi/A(N) catalyst is about 20 K lower than that of the commercial CoMoNi/A(C), indicating the positive effect of the uniquely porous structure on the weakening of the interaction between octahedral Mo species and the support.

    Figure 5 TPR patterns of four catalystsa—CoMoNi/A(C); b—CoMoNi/A(N); c—CoMoNi/T0.2A0.8(N); d—CoMoNi/T0.5A0.5(N)

    In the presence of titania in the catalyst (Figs. 5c, 5d), the first peak shifts to lower temperature, and more importantly, the intensity of the second peak increases greatly, which is not only ascribed to the reduction of Ni2+, but also to the forward shift of the reduction of the tetrahedral Mo species (the third peak of CoMoNi/A(C) or CoMoNi/A(N)). Above observations demonstrate that the addition of titania to alumina can enhance reducibility of Mo species. Similar results were also obtained by Ramírez et al. [31] and Cede?o et al. [33]. The reason for the enhancement lies in the weakening of the metal-support interaction caused by a smaller polarization effect of Al3+ions [27]. In addition, the second peak includes contributions from reduction of titania [31, 33], which is evidenced by the increase of the peak intensity with the increasing amount of titania. The third peak is assigned to the difficult reduction of Mo species to metallic Mo [27], which is not observed for CoMoNi/A(C) and CoMoNi/A(N) catalysts owing to higher reduction temperature that is above the upper limit of the apparatus used.

    3.2 Catalytic activities

    The effect of the hierarchically macro-/mesoporous structure on the HDS activity of the catalyst is illustrated in Figs. 6 and 7. As shown in Fig. 6, the intrinsic activities (free of both external and internal diffusion limitations) are almost the same for the presulfided commercial CoMoNi/A(C-S) catalyst and the hierarchically porous structured CoMoNi/A(N-S) catalyst. It is expectable because both catalysts have similar physicochemical properties. However, when it comes to large catalyst particles (0.9-2.0 mm) in the presence of internal diffusion limitations, the apparent activities are quite different for the two catalysts. As indicated in Fig. 7, the hierarchically porous catalyst shows much higher HDS activities than the commercial catalyst, which suggests that the hierarchically porous structure can enhance diffusion of substances to the active sites of the catalyst.

    Figure 7 Comparison of apparent HDS activities of novel and commercial Co-Mo-Ni/Al2O3catalysts (0.9-2.0 mm, 0.46 g)(Reaction conditions

    The effect of titania addition to alumina on the HDS activity of the presulfided catalyst is shown in Fig. 8. The order of the HDS activity for the catalysts is CoMoNi/T0.2A0.8(N-S)>CoMoNi/A(N-S)>CoMoNi/ T0.5A0.5(N-S). Compared to the CoMoNi/A(N-S) catalyst without addition of titania in the support, the presence of a small amount of titania in CoMoNi/T0.2A0.8(N-S) improves the HDS activity, but a large proportion of titania in CoMoNi/T0.5A0.5(N-S) leads to a dramatic decrease of activity. As shown by the TPR profiles (Fig. 5) together with literature reports [34, 35], the interaction between Mo and TiO2-Al2O3is weaker than that between Mo and Al2O3, which is derived from the electronic promotion effect of TiO2[35, 36]. As a consequence, Mo species supported on TiO2-Al2O3are highly sulfided during the sulfidation process, resulting in an increase of the number of HDS active centers (coordinatively unsaturated sites), while the sulfidation of Mo is rather difficult on Al2O3due to the high metal-support interaction. For CoMoNi/T0.2A0.8(N-S), it possesses not only the lowest temperature for thereduction of octahedral Mo species, but also the largest surface area and pore volume as well as the uniform distribution of TiO2and Al2O3, and thus exhibits the highest HDS activity among the three catalysts. However, for CoMoNi/T0.5A0.5(N-S), both the non-uniform distribution of titania and alumina in the support and the lowest surface area and pore volume lead to a decrease in the dispersion of the active phase [37], which in turn counteracts the reduced metal-support interaction resulting from addition of titania, and consequently the HDS activity decreases sharply.

    Figure 8 Comparison of HDS activities of Co-Mo-Ni/Al2O3and Co-Mo-Ni/TiO2-Al2O3catalysts (50-75 μm, 0.10 g)(Reaction conditions: (a) p=2.5 MPa, =4.60×10?3mol·min?1,R=3.0; (b) p=2.5 MPa,=5.37×10?3mol·min?1, R=2.0)CoMoNi/T0.5A0.5(N-S)

    The effect of presulfidation on the HDS activity of the catalysts is shown in Figs. 9 and 10. As shown in Fig. 9, for the CoMoNi/A(N) catalyst without titania addition, the HDS activities of the presulfided CoMoNi/A(N-S) are much higher than those of the non-presulfided CoMoNi/A(N). The conversions of thiophene obtained with CoMoNi/A(N-S) are, depending on the reaction conditions, (30-77)% higher than those with CoMoNi/A(N). However, for the CoMoNi/T0.2A0.8(N) catalyst with titania addition, non-presulfided and presulfided catalysts exhibit similar HDS activities (shown in Fig. 10). The results clearly show that the non-presulfided CoMoNi/T0.2A0.8(N) catalyst still exhibits high HDS activities, whereas the CoMoNi/A(N) catalyst without presulfiding treatment shows low activities. Similar results are also found by Wei et al. [26], who reported that the capability of sulfur removal over a non-presulfided NiMo/TiO2-Al2O3catalyst was very high and even better than that over a presulfided commercial NiMo/Al2O3catalyst.

    As mentioned above, the presence of titania on the alumina surface weakens the metal-support interaction, and as a result the non-presulfided CoMoNi/T0.2A0.8(N) catalyst could be readily sulfided during the initial stage of HDS reaction. On the contrary, it is very difficult to transform the non-presulfided CoMoNi/A(N) catalyst to the sulfided state during HDS reaction, which normally requires a relatively long time [26]. Therefore, the non-presulfided CoMoNi/A(N) catalyst shows much lower activities than the presulfided catalyst.

    Figure 9 Comparison of HDS activities of presulfided and non-presulfided CoMoNi/A(N) catalysts (50-75 μm, 0.10 g)(Reaction conditions

    Figure 10 Comparison of HDS activities of presulfided and non-presulfided CoMoNi/T0.2A0.8(N) catalysts (50-75 μm, 0.10 g)(Reaction conditions

    3.3 Kinetic analysis

    In our very recent publication [24], a rigorous kinetic study was performed over the commercial CoMoNi/A(C)and the hierarchically porous structured CoMoNi/A(N) catalysts. Both intrinsic kinetics over fine powders (50-75 μm) and apparent kinetics over large particles (0.9-2.0 mm) were investigated. The intrinsic and apparent activation energies for the thiophene HDS reaction over CoMoNi/A(N) were 65.84 and 50.79 kJ·mol?1, respectively, while the corresponding values over CoMoNi/A(C) were 69.92 and 34.97 kJ·mol?1, respectively. These two catalysts had similar intrinsic activation energies, but the commercial catalyst had much lower apparent activation energy (34.97 kJ·mol?1) than the novel catalyst (50.79 kJ·mol?1). This result theoretically demonstrated the diffusion- facilitating effect of the hierarchically porous structure of the novel CoMoNi/A(N) catalyst. In this work, we extend the kinetic analysis to CoMoNi/T0.2A0.8(N) and Co-MoNi/T0.5A0.5(N) catalysts in order to further evaluate the effect of titania addition on the HDS activity of the catalyst from the viewpoint of kinetics.

    Table 2 Estimated kinetic and adsorption parameters for different catalysts

    Detailed information on the development of the kinetic model for thiophene HDS is reported elsewhere [24, 38]. The rate expression is given by

    whereTp,2Hp and2HSp denote the partial pressures of thiophene, hydrogen, and hydrogen sulfide, respectively. The reaction and adsorption constants can be expressed in the usual Arrhenius form as follows,

    where E is the activation energy and Qiis the adsorption heat of species i. The kinetic and adsorption parameters involved in Eqs. (2) and (3) can be estimated by fitting the experimental data with the kinetic model. The parameter estimation procedure is described elsewhere [24].

    The estimated intrinsic parameters for thiophene HDS over the sulfided CoMoNi/T0.2A0.8(N-S) and CoMoNi/T0.5A0.5(N-S) catalysts are shown in Table 2. For the purpose of comparison, the intrinsic parameters over the sulfided CoMoNi/A(N-S) catalyst, which have been reported in the previous work [24], are also listed here. Figs. 11 and 12 show comparison of the measured conversion of thiophene and the corresponding value predicted by the kinetic model over CoMoNi/ T0.2A0.8(N-S) and CoMoNi/T0.5A0.5(N-S), respectively. The average relative errors for the two catalysts are 6.0% and 5.7%, respectively, clearly indicating that the above model can describe the experimental result very well.

    Figure 11 Comparison of experimental and calculated conversions of thiophene over the sulfided CoMoNi/T0.2A0.8(N-S) catalyst

    Figure 12 Comparison of experimental and calculated conversions of thiophene over the sulfided CoMoNi/T0.5A0.5(N-S) catalyst

    The intrinsic activation energies for the three catalysts, CoMoNi/A(N-S), CoMoNi/T0.2A0.8(N-S) and CoMoNi/T0.5A0.5(N-S), are 65.8, 54.3 and 72.3 kJ·mol?1, respectively. CoMoNi/T0.2A0.8(N-S) that displays the highest HDS activity among the catalysts has the lowest activation energy, while CoMoNi/T0.5A0.5(N-S) with the lowest HDS activity has the highest activation energy. The order of the intrinsic activation energy of the catalysts is therefore consistent with that of their HDS activities. Hence, both experimental measurements and kinetic analysis reveal the effect of titania addition to alumina on the HDS activity of the catalyst: a low titania loading in the catalyst is favorable for anincrease in the HDS activity, but a high loading shows a negative effect.

    4 CONCLUSIONS

    In this work home made Co-Mo-Ni catalysts supported on hierarchically macro-/mesoporous structured Al2O3and TiO2-Al2O3exhibit higher activities in thiophene HDS compared to a commercial catalyst supported on unimodal mesoporous Al2O3. The straight macrochannels of the hierarchically porous supports play an important role, since they can greatly reduce the internal diffusion limitations of reactants and facilitate the diffusion of thiophene molecules from the outer surface to the active sites of the catalysts. For the hierarchically porous Co-Mo-Ni catalysts, the addition of titania to alumina in the support greatly influences HDS activities. The catalyst with a low titania loading shows very high HDS activities, even without presulfiding treatment. On the contrary, the catalyst with a high titania loading presents much lower activities. The difference in the textural properties of the catalysts with different titania loadings is the main reason. The present results indicate that hierarchically macro-/mesoporous structured TiO2-Al2O3mixed oxides with a low titania loading are good supports for Mo-based catalysts in thiophene HDS, and may be suitable for the deep HDS processes.

    REFERENCES

    1 Song, C.S., “An overview of new approaches to deep desulfurization for ultra-clean gasoline, diesel fuel and jet fuel”, Catal. Today, 86, 211-263 (2003).

    2 Breysse, M., Afanasiev, P., Geantet, C., Vrinat, M., “Overview of support effects in hydrotreating catalysts”, Catal. Today, 86, 5-16 (2003).

    3 Dhar, G.M., Srinivas, B.N., Rana, M.S., Kumar, M., Maity, S.K.,“Mixed oxide supported hydrodesulfurization catalysts—A review”, Catal. Today, 86, 45-60 (2003).

    4 Ling, T.R., Wan, B.Z., Lin, H.P., Mou, C.Y., “Desulfurization of vacuum gasoil by MCM-41 supported molybdenum-nickel catalysts”, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res., 48, 1797-1803 (2009).

    5 Yang, D., Zhou, Z.M., Cheng, Z.M., Yuan, W.K., “Effect of internal diffusion on thiophene hydrodesulfurization in pyrolysis gasoline”, J. Fuel Chem. Technol., 36, 437-442 (2008).

    6 Yang, D., Cheng, Z.M., Zhou, Z.M., Zhang, J.C., Yuan, W.K., “Pyrolysis gasoline hydrogenation in the second-stage reactor: reaction kinetics and reactor simulation”, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res., 47, 1051-1058 (2008).

    7 Do?u, T., “Diffusion and reaction in catalyst pellets with bidisperse pore size distribution”, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res., 37, 2158-2171 (1998).

    8 Silva, V.M.T.M., Rodrigues, A.E., “Adsorption and diffusion in bidisperse pore structures”, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res., 38, 4023-4031 (1999).

    9 Hussain, M., Yun, J.S., Ihm, S.K., Russo, N., Geobaldo, F., “Synthesis, characterization, and thiophene hydrodesulfurization activity of novel macroporous and mesomacroporous carbon”, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res., 50, 2530-2535 (2011).

    10 Liu, F., Xu, S.P., Cao, L., Chi, Y., Zhang, T., Xue, D.F., “A comparison of NiMo/Al2O3catalysts prepared by impregnation and coprecipitation methods for hydrodesulfurization of dibenzothiophene”, J. Phys. Chem. C, 111, 7396-7402 (2007).

    11 Blin, J.L., Léonard, A., Yuan, Z.Y., Gigot, L., Vantomme, A., Cheetham, A.K., Su, B.L., “Hierarchically mesoporous/macroporous metal oxides templated from polyethylene oxide surfactant assemblies”, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed., 42, 2872-2875 (2003).

    12 Yuan, Z.Y., Ren, T.Z., Azioune, A., Pireaux, J.J., Su, B.L.,“Self-assembly of hierarchically mesoporous-macroporous phosphated nanocrystalline aluminum (oxyhydr) oxide materials”, Chem. Mater., 18, 1753-1767 (2006).

    13 Hakim, S.H., Shanks, B.H., “A comparative study of macroporous metal oxides synthesized via a unified approach”, Chem. Mater., 21, 2027-2038 (2009).

    14 Zeng, T.Y., Zhou, Z.M., Cheng, Z.M., Yuan, W.K., “Effect of surfactant on the physical properties of hierarchically macro-mesoporous metal oxides”, Chem. Lett., 39, 680-681 (2010).

    15 Zhou, Z.M., Zeng, T.Y., Cheng, Z.M., Yuan, W.K., “Preparation and characterization of titania-alumina mixed oxides with hierarchically macro-/mesoporous structures”, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res., 50, 883-890 (2011).

    16 Yang, X.Y., Léonard, A., Lemaire, A., Tian, G., Su, B.L.,“Self-formation phenomenon to hierarchically structured porous materials: design, synthesis, formation mechanism and applications”, Chem. Commun., 47, 2763-2786 (2011).

    17 Wang, X.C., Yu, J.C., Ho, C.M., Hou, Y.D., Fu, X.Z., “Photocatalytic activity of a hierarchically macro/mesoporous titania”, Langmuir, 21, 2552-2559 (2005).

    18 Yu, J.G., Su, Y.R., Cheng, B., “Template-free fabrication and enhanced photocatalytic activity of hierarchical macro-/mesoporous titania”, Adv. Funct. Mater., 17, 1984-1990 (2007).

    19 Tidahy, H.L., Hosseni, M., Siffert, S., Cousin, R., Lamonier, J.F., Abouka?s, A., Su, B.L., Giraudon, J.M., Leclercq, G., “Nanostructured macro-mesoporous zirconia impregnated by noble metal for catalytic total oxidation of toluene”, Catal. Today, 137, 335-339 (2008).

    20 Zeng, T.Y., Zhou, Z.M., Zhu, J., Cheng, Z.M., Yuan, P.Q., Yuan, W.K., “Palladium supported on hierarchically macro-mesoporous titania for styrene hydrogenation”, Catal. Today, 147S, S41-S45 (2009).

    21 Ma, T.Y., Zhang, X.J., Yuan, Z.Y., “Hierarchical meso-/macroporous aluminum phosphonate hybrid materials as multifunctional adsorbents”, J. Phys. Chem. C, 113, 12854-12862 (2009).

    22 Zhou, Z.M., Zeng, T.Y., Cheng, Z.M., Yuan, W.K., “Preparation of a catalyst for selective hydrogenation of pyrolysis gasoline”, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res., 49, 11112-11118 (2010).

    23 Zhou, Z.M., Zeng, T.Y., Cheng, Z.M., Yuan, W.K., “Diffusionenhanced hierarchically macro-mesoporous catalyst for selective hydrogenation of pyrolysis gasoline”, AIChE J., 57, 2198-2206 (2011).

    24 Huang, Y.L., Zhou, Z.M., Qi, Y., Li, X., Cheng, Z.M., Yuan, W.K.,“Hierarchically macro-/mesoporous structured Co-Mo-Ni/γ-Al2O3catalyst for the hydrodesulfurization of thiophene”, Chem. Eng. J., 172, 444-451 (2011).

    25 Yoshinaka, S., Segawa, K., “Hydrodesulfurization of dibenzothiophenes over molybdenum catalyst supported on TiO2-Al2O3”, Catal. Today, 45, 293-298 (1998).

    26 Wei, Z.B., Yan, W.H., Zhang, H., Ren, T.L., Xin, Q., Li, Z.C., “Hydrodesulfurization activity of NiMo/TiO2-Al2O3catalysts”, Appl. Catal. A Gen., 167, 39-48 (1998).

    27 Grzechowiak, J.R., Wereszczako-Zielińska, I., Rynkowski, J., Zió?ek, M., “Hydrodesulphurisation catalysts supported on alumina-titania”,Appl. Catal. A Gen., 250, 95-103 (2003).

    28 Ramírez, J., Rayo, P., Gutiérrez-Alejandre, A., Ancheyta, J., Rana, M.S., “Analysis of the hydrotreatment of Maya heavy crude with NiMo catalysts supported on TiO2-Al2O3binary oxides: Effect of the incorporation method of Ti”, Catal. Today, 109, 54-60 (2005).

    29 Huang, W.Q., Duan, A.J., Zhao, Z., Wan, G.F., Jiang, G.Y., Dou, T., Chung, K.H., Liu, J., “Ti-modified alumina supports prepared by sol-gel method used for deep HDS catalysts”, Catal. Today, 131, 314-321 (2008).

    30 Reddy, B.M., Reddy, E.P., Srinivas, S.T., “Dispersion and activity of Molybdena-alumina catalysts prepared by impregnation and solid/solid wetting methods”, J. Catal., 136, 50-58 (1992).

    31 Ramírez, J., Macías, G., Cede?o, L., Gutiérrez-Alejandre, A., Cuevas, R., Castillo, P., “The role of titania in supported Mo, CoMo, NiMo, and NiW hydrodesulfurization catalysts: analysis of past and new evidences”, Catal. Today, 98, 19-30 (2004).

    32 Zepeda, T.A., Pawelec, B., Fierro, J.L.G., Olivas, A., Fuentes, S., Halachev, T., “Effect of Al and Ti content in HMS material on the catalytic activity of NiMo and CoMo hydrotreating catalysts in the HDS of DBT”, Micropor. Mesopor. Mat., 111, 157-170 (2008).

    33 Cede?o, L., Ramírez, J., López-Agudo, A., Vrinat, M., Cordero, R.L.,“TPR and NO adsorption studies of Mo, CoMo and NiMo catalysts supported on Al2O3-TiO2mixed oxides”, Stud. Surf. Sci. Catal., 127, 369-372 (1999).

    34 Segawa, K., Takahashi, K., Satoh, S., “Development of new catalysts for deep hydrodesulfurization of gas oil”, Catal. Today, 63, 123-131 (2000).

    35 Saih, Y., Segawa, K., “Tailoring of alumina surfaces as supports for NiMo sulfide catalysts in the ultra deep hydrodesulfurization of gas oil: case study of TiO2-coated alumina prepared by chemical vapor deposition technique”, Catal. Today, 86, 61-72 (2003).

    36 Wan, G.F., Duan, A.J., Zhang, Y., Zhao, Z., Jiang, G.Y., Zhang, D.Q., Liu, J., Chung, K., “NiW/AMBT catalysts for the production of ultra-low sulfur diesel”, Catal. Today, 158, 521-529 (2010).

    37 Amezcua, J.C., Lizama, L., Salcedo, C., Puente, I., Domínguez, J.M., Klimova, T., “NiMo catalysts supported on titania-modified SBA-16 for 4,6-dimethyldibenzothiophene hydrodesulfurization”, Catal. Today, 107?108, 578-588 (2005).

    38 Borgna, A., Hensen, E.J.M., van Veen, J.A.R., Niemantsverdriet, J.W., “Intrinsic kinetics of thiophene hydrodesulfurization on a sulfided NiMo/SiO2planar model catalyst”, J. Catal., 221, 541-548 (2004).

    2012-10-30, accepted 2012-12-30.

    * Supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (21276076), the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities of China (WA1014003), and State Key Laboratory of Chemical Engineering (SKL-ChE-10C06).

    ** To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: zmzhou@ecust.edu.cn

    猜你喜歡
    劉超永利
    老吳的拉面館
    白象:打造有骨氣的民族品牌
    Theoretical study of novel B-C-O compounds with non-diamond isoelectronic
    Removal of GaN film over AlGaN with inductively coupled BCl3/Ar atomic layer etch
    科技興邦 創(chuàng)新強(qiáng)國(guó)
    深圳市永利種業(yè)有限公司
    辣椒雜志(2021年4期)2021-04-14 08:28:14
    征程萬(wàn)里,初心如一
    雷鋒(2021年12期)2021-04-12 00:57:22
    詩(shī)經(jīng)
    畢永利教授簡(jiǎn)介
    Design and experiment of the centrifugal pump impellers with twisted inlet vice blades *
    精品人妻在线不人妻| 狂野欧美激情性xxxx在线观看| 精品卡一卡二卡四卡免费| 少妇人妻精品综合一区二区| 成人综合一区亚洲| 国产高清不卡午夜福利| 日本vs欧美在线观看视频| 国产成人av激情在线播放| 在线免费观看不下载黄p国产| 国产日韩欧美在线精品| 国产女主播在线喷水免费视频网站| 亚洲国产av新网站| 9191精品国产免费久久| 三上悠亚av全集在线观看| 人妻一区二区av| 交换朋友夫妻互换小说| 国产亚洲午夜精品一区二区久久| 国产片特级美女逼逼视频| 国产亚洲av片在线观看秒播厂| 五月开心婷婷网| 成人黄色视频免费在线看| 欧美少妇被猛烈插入视频| 在现免费观看毛片| 少妇精品久久久久久久| 肉色欧美久久久久久久蜜桃| 亚洲av.av天堂| 热re99久久国产66热| 黄色 视频免费看| a级片在线免费高清观看视频| 国产精品 国内视频| 亚洲综合色网址| 最近手机中文字幕大全| 一二三四在线观看免费中文在 | 内地一区二区视频在线| 女人被躁到高潮嗷嗷叫费观| 高清在线视频一区二区三区| 成人国产麻豆网| 色婷婷av一区二区三区视频| 日韩三级伦理在线观看| 久久人人爽人人爽人人片va| 日韩av免费高清视频| 夫妻午夜视频| 美女xxoo啪啪120秒动态图| 午夜免费鲁丝| 老司机影院成人| 国产精品一二三区在线看| 免费看av在线观看网站| 人妻一区二区av| 1024视频免费在线观看| 亚洲一码二码三码区别大吗| 侵犯人妻中文字幕一二三四区| 王馨瑶露胸无遮挡在线观看| 久久久久网色| kizo精华| 又大又黄又爽视频免费| 一区二区三区乱码不卡18| 亚洲图色成人| 寂寞人妻少妇视频99o| 亚洲精品乱久久久久久| 水蜜桃什么品种好| 亚洲人成网站在线观看播放| 欧美亚洲 丝袜 人妻 在线| 91久久精品国产一区二区三区| 秋霞在线观看毛片| 午夜福利,免费看| 日产精品乱码卡一卡2卡三| 国产视频首页在线观看| 蜜桃国产av成人99| 成人亚洲精品一区在线观看| 一本色道久久久久久精品综合| av电影中文网址| 一个人免费看片子| 亚洲激情五月婷婷啪啪| 久久青草综合色| 久久久久久久大尺度免费视频| 欧美日本中文国产一区发布| 亚洲美女视频黄频| 最近手机中文字幕大全| 久久久欧美国产精品| 2022亚洲国产成人精品| 综合色丁香网| 狠狠精品人妻久久久久久综合| 亚洲精品美女久久av网站| 五月伊人婷婷丁香| 热re99久久国产66热| 极品少妇高潮喷水抽搐| 男的添女的下面高潮视频| 国产男人的电影天堂91| 五月天丁香电影| 国产淫语在线视频| 中文欧美无线码| 综合色丁香网| 久久久国产欧美日韩av| 亚洲激情五月婷婷啪啪| 亚洲色图综合在线观看| 久久久国产欧美日韩av| 蜜臀久久99精品久久宅男| 美女xxoo啪啪120秒动态图| 亚洲国产欧美日韩在线播放| www.av在线官网国产| 一区二区av电影网| 9热在线视频观看99| 精品人妻在线不人妻| 国产又爽黄色视频| 国产精品久久久久久久电影| 精品一区在线观看国产| 亚洲精品国产av蜜桃| 亚洲经典国产精华液单| 色哟哟·www| 少妇熟女欧美另类| 人人妻人人澡人人爽人人夜夜| 亚洲综合色惰| 最近的中文字幕免费完整| 日韩成人伦理影院| www.色视频.com| 9191精品国产免费久久| 精品视频人人做人人爽| 久久99精品国语久久久| 美国免费a级毛片| 国产免费又黄又爽又色| 国产熟女午夜一区二区三区| 99九九在线精品视频| 一级爰片在线观看| 中文欧美无线码| 久久韩国三级中文字幕| 日韩精品免费视频一区二区三区 | 国产精品女同一区二区软件| 97在线人人人人妻| 亚洲av中文av极速乱| 成人18禁高潮啪啪吃奶动态图| 成人二区视频| 免费女性裸体啪啪无遮挡网站| 有码 亚洲区| 国产精品一二三区在线看| av有码第一页| 欧美国产精品一级二级三级| 99久久人妻综合| 在线天堂最新版资源| 国产亚洲欧美精品永久| 黄网站色视频无遮挡免费观看| 亚洲精品美女久久av网站| 少妇人妻久久综合中文| 久久久久国产精品人妻一区二区| videosex国产| 欧美少妇被猛烈插入视频| 如何舔出高潮| 母亲3免费完整高清在线观看 | 亚洲欧美清纯卡通| 另类亚洲欧美激情| 日韩伦理黄色片| 亚洲综合精品二区| 色5月婷婷丁香| 国产国语露脸激情在线看| 午夜福利影视在线免费观看| 国产又色又爽无遮挡免| 日本vs欧美在线观看视频| 欧美日韩av久久| 国产成人一区二区在线| 精品午夜福利在线看| 在线免费观看不下载黄p国产| 亚洲精品美女久久av网站| 亚洲一级一片aⅴ在线观看| 日韩 亚洲 欧美在线| 亚洲久久久国产精品| 精品久久久久久电影网| 美女国产高潮福利片在线看| 少妇高潮的动态图| 多毛熟女@视频| 亚洲精品中文字幕在线视频| 全区人妻精品视频| 天美传媒精品一区二区| 国产成人精品婷婷| 三上悠亚av全集在线观看| 制服丝袜香蕉在线| 久久热在线av| 日本欧美视频一区| 国产黄频视频在线观看| 午夜91福利影院| 男女无遮挡免费网站观看| 日本与韩国留学比较| 99久久综合免费| 日韩电影二区| 一区二区av电影网| 久久久久国产精品人妻一区二区| 全区人妻精品视频| 日日爽夜夜爽网站| 考比视频在线观看| 免费不卡的大黄色大毛片视频在线观看| 国产成人免费无遮挡视频| 婷婷成人精品国产| 精品国产一区二区三区四区第35| 深夜精品福利| 国产精品秋霞免费鲁丝片| 老司机影院成人| 91精品三级在线观看| 亚洲综合色惰| 黄色视频在线播放观看不卡| 免费av不卡在线播放| 日本猛色少妇xxxxx猛交久久| 欧美亚洲日本最大视频资源| 男的添女的下面高潮视频| 亚洲 欧美一区二区三区| av在线老鸭窝| 国产国语露脸激情在线看| 午夜激情av网站| 成人免费观看视频高清| 久久影院123| 乱人伦中国视频| a级毛片在线看网站| 91精品伊人久久大香线蕉| 一区二区日韩欧美中文字幕 | 99热全是精品| 满18在线观看网站| 亚洲成人手机| 午夜福利,免费看| 一本色道久久久久久精品综合| 久久精品久久久久久久性| 免费观看在线日韩| 亚洲高清免费不卡视频| 欧美人与善性xxx| 一本色道久久久久久精品综合| 欧美丝袜亚洲另类| 精品福利永久在线观看| 日韩欧美精品免费久久| 国产一区二区激情短视频 | 99热6这里只有精品| 亚洲成色77777| www.熟女人妻精品国产 | 有码 亚洲区| 亚洲美女搞黄在线观看| 亚洲美女黄色视频免费看| 久久国内精品自在自线图片| 成人免费观看视频高清| 黄色怎么调成土黄色| 在线观看一区二区三区激情| 搡女人真爽免费视频火全软件| 国产成人aa在线观看| 国产白丝娇喘喷水9色精品| 男女边吃奶边做爰视频| 丝袜喷水一区| 日韩制服骚丝袜av| 久久久久久久大尺度免费视频| 久久久久久久久久久久大奶| 日韩免费高清中文字幕av| 高清视频免费观看一区二区| 多毛熟女@视频| av黄色大香蕉| 99热国产这里只有精品6| 最近2019中文字幕mv第一页| 永久网站在线| 一区二区三区四区激情视频| 中国美白少妇内射xxxbb| xxx大片免费视频| 18禁动态无遮挡网站| 男女边摸边吃奶| 咕卡用的链子| 性高湖久久久久久久久免费观看| 天堂8中文在线网| 久久婷婷青草| 少妇的丰满在线观看| 久久久久久久国产电影| 日韩人妻精品一区2区三区| 好男人视频免费观看在线| a级片在线免费高清观看视频| 五月玫瑰六月丁香| 男女午夜视频在线观看 | 久久久a久久爽久久v久久| 一区在线观看完整版| 国产精品99久久99久久久不卡 | 女人久久www免费人成看片| www.熟女人妻精品国产 | 丰满迷人的少妇在线观看| 国产精品久久久av美女十八| 极品人妻少妇av视频| 久久久精品区二区三区| 1024视频免费在线观看| 九色亚洲精品在线播放| 大话2 男鬼变身卡| 国产在视频线精品| 欧美最新免费一区二区三区| 最近中文字幕高清免费大全6| h视频一区二区三区| 国产成人91sexporn| 亚洲av综合色区一区| 久久久亚洲精品成人影院| 性色avwww在线观看| 不卡视频在线观看欧美| 丰满迷人的少妇在线观看| h视频一区二区三区| 亚洲一级一片aⅴ在线观看| 18禁观看日本| 精品国产乱码久久久久久小说| 青春草国产在线视频| 最近最新中文字幕大全免费视频 | 欧美亚洲 丝袜 人妻 在线| a级毛片黄视频| 99精国产麻豆久久婷婷| 18禁在线无遮挡免费观看视频| 高清视频免费观看一区二区| 久久综合国产亚洲精品| 18+在线观看网站| 一边亲一边摸免费视频| 涩涩av久久男人的天堂| 日日撸夜夜添| 国产亚洲av片在线观看秒播厂| 免费播放大片免费观看视频在线观看| 在线亚洲精品国产二区图片欧美| 哪个播放器可以免费观看大片| 亚洲精品成人av观看孕妇| 国产女主播在线喷水免费视频网站| 一区二区三区乱码不卡18| 久久久国产精品麻豆| 久久99热这里只频精品6学生| 欧美变态另类bdsm刘玥| av一本久久久久| 巨乳人妻的诱惑在线观看| 精品一区二区免费观看| 亚洲少妇的诱惑av| 国产麻豆69| 飞空精品影院首页| 少妇被粗大猛烈的视频| 男人舔女人的私密视频| 最新中文字幕久久久久| 欧美成人午夜免费资源| 搡女人真爽免费视频火全软件| 国产精品久久久久久久久免| 最黄视频免费看| 久久精品久久久久久久性| 丝袜人妻中文字幕| 亚洲精品第二区| 日韩人妻精品一区2区三区| 精品一区二区三区视频在线| 精品福利永久在线观看| 最近2019中文字幕mv第一页| 欧美bdsm另类| 婷婷色av中文字幕| 美女主播在线视频| 在线亚洲精品国产二区图片欧美| 视频区图区小说| 欧美成人精品欧美一级黄| 欧美亚洲 丝袜 人妻 在线| 少妇 在线观看| 午夜福利网站1000一区二区三区| 在线 av 中文字幕| 国产女主播在线喷水免费视频网站| 国内精品宾馆在线| 高清黄色对白视频在线免费看| av不卡在线播放| 色网站视频免费| 国产成人a∨麻豆精品| 黄色配什么色好看| 久久精品久久精品一区二区三区| www.av在线官网国产| 免费观看性生交大片5| 99国产精品免费福利视频| 青春草亚洲视频在线观看| 成人综合一区亚洲| 免费播放大片免费观看视频在线观看| 国产精品久久久久成人av| 久久久a久久爽久久v久久| 日韩人妻精品一区2区三区| av不卡在线播放| 免费观看在线日韩| av女优亚洲男人天堂| 久久99一区二区三区| 欧美 亚洲 国产 日韩一| 人体艺术视频欧美日本| 亚洲av免费高清在线观看| 欧美xxⅹ黑人| 色婷婷久久久亚洲欧美| 亚洲欧美一区二区三区黑人 | 天天影视国产精品| 精品久久国产蜜桃| 人妻 亚洲 视频| 午夜久久久在线观看| 久久狼人影院| 欧美精品av麻豆av| 久久av网站| 观看美女的网站| 欧美+日韩+精品| 天堂8中文在线网| 久久久久精品人妻al黑| 国产精品久久久久久av不卡| 国产高清不卡午夜福利| 亚洲av免费高清在线观看| 亚洲国产精品一区二区三区在线| 黄色视频在线播放观看不卡| 日产精品乱码卡一卡2卡三| 青春草国产在线视频| 成人手机av| 免费看av在线观看网站| 成人国产麻豆网| 日日啪夜夜爽| 午夜激情久久久久久久| 国产午夜精品一二区理论片| 丰满迷人的少妇在线观看| 欧美+日韩+精品| av国产精品久久久久影院| 亚洲精品美女久久av网站| 国产成人免费无遮挡视频| 亚洲经典国产精华液单| 日韩欧美精品免费久久| 国产免费一级a男人的天堂| 国产精品一区www在线观看| 亚洲精品乱码久久久久久按摩| 一边摸一边做爽爽视频免费| 亚洲美女黄色视频免费看| 欧美成人精品欧美一级黄| 视频区图区小说| 极品少妇高潮喷水抽搐| 一级片'在线观看视频| 成年女人在线观看亚洲视频| 成人漫画全彩无遮挡| 精品人妻熟女毛片av久久网站| 日日摸夜夜添夜夜爱| 伦理电影大哥的女人| 丝袜美足系列| 最近最新中文字幕大全免费视频 | 日韩不卡一区二区三区视频在线| 丝袜喷水一区| 久久久精品94久久精品| 亚洲性久久影院| 黄色怎么调成土黄色| 国产白丝娇喘喷水9色精品| 精品久久久精品久久久| 亚洲国产精品一区二区三区在线| 秋霞在线观看毛片| 欧美bdsm另类| 国产一区有黄有色的免费视频| 九色成人免费人妻av| 赤兔流量卡办理| 青青草视频在线视频观看| 黄色一级大片看看| 我要看黄色一级片免费的| 高清黄色对白视频在线免费看| a 毛片基地| 只有这里有精品99| 内地一区二区视频在线| 国产男人的电影天堂91| 熟女av电影| 久久久久久久精品精品| 99精国产麻豆久久婷婷| 精品一区二区三区视频在线| 国产精品成人在线| 内地一区二区视频在线| 啦啦啦在线观看免费高清www| 国产精品国产av在线观看| 美女xxoo啪啪120秒动态图| 国产成人精品福利久久| 亚洲欧美清纯卡通| 亚洲av国产av综合av卡| 亚洲国产欧美日韩在线播放| 亚洲伊人久久精品综合| 亚洲国产看品久久| 国产综合精华液| 亚洲中文av在线| 精品久久久精品久久久| 男女边摸边吃奶| 丝袜在线中文字幕| 亚洲av男天堂| 一区二区日韩欧美中文字幕 | 午夜免费男女啪啪视频观看| 天美传媒精品一区二区| 熟女电影av网| 一级黄片播放器| 美女主播在线视频| 久久久a久久爽久久v久久| 黑人猛操日本美女一级片| 亚洲成av片中文字幕在线观看 | a 毛片基地| 国产一区二区三区av在线| 精品亚洲乱码少妇综合久久| 777米奇影视久久| 午夜免费男女啪啪视频观看| 国产成人免费无遮挡视频| 欧美97在线视频| 亚洲欧洲日产国产| 国产一区二区三区综合在线观看 | 亚洲精品日韩在线中文字幕| 国产欧美日韩一区二区三区在线| 免费不卡的大黄色大毛片视频在线观看| 精品国产一区二区三区四区第35| 青青草视频在线视频观看| 老司机影院毛片| 五月天丁香电影| 成人手机av| 97在线人人人人妻| 亚洲精品国产色婷婷电影| 大香蕉久久网| 99久国产av精品国产电影| 亚洲精品久久久久久婷婷小说| 熟妇人妻不卡中文字幕| 中文精品一卡2卡3卡4更新| 久久久欧美国产精品| 国产成人免费无遮挡视频| 大话2 男鬼变身卡| 999精品在线视频| 国产成人91sexporn| 两个人免费观看高清视频| 综合色丁香网| 成年美女黄网站色视频大全免费| 麻豆乱淫一区二区| 一区二区av电影网| 两个人免费观看高清视频| 中文字幕av电影在线播放| 狠狠婷婷综合久久久久久88av| 51国产日韩欧美| 日韩中字成人| 免费少妇av软件| 青春草亚洲视频在线观看| 亚洲av电影在线进入| 欧美精品亚洲一区二区| av福利片在线| 国产免费又黄又爽又色| 最近中文字幕高清免费大全6| 天堂中文最新版在线下载| 国产69精品久久久久777片| 国产国语露脸激情在线看| 亚洲丝袜综合中文字幕| 国产成人免费无遮挡视频| 人成视频在线观看免费观看| 亚洲国产欧美日韩在线播放| 午夜激情久久久久久久| 免费大片黄手机在线观看| av不卡在线播放| 欧美精品一区二区免费开放| 一个人免费看片子| 视频中文字幕在线观看| 国产免费福利视频在线观看| 如何舔出高潮| 国产激情久久老熟女| 亚洲国产日韩一区二区| 国产精品久久久久久精品电影小说| 99香蕉大伊视频| 国产一区有黄有色的免费视频| 国产成人av激情在线播放| 久久人妻熟女aⅴ| 国产精品久久久久久精品古装| 我的女老师完整版在线观看| 午夜福利,免费看| 又黄又粗又硬又大视频| 国产 一区精品| 亚洲国产毛片av蜜桃av| 久久综合国产亚洲精品| 永久网站在线| 1024视频免费在线观看| 久久精品国产a三级三级三级| 91久久精品国产一区二区三区| 久久国产精品大桥未久av| 一边摸一边做爽爽视频免费| 色吧在线观看| 亚洲性久久影院| 日本欧美国产在线视频| 欧美人与性动交α欧美精品济南到 | 婷婷色av中文字幕| 自拍欧美九色日韩亚洲蝌蚪91| 久久久久久久久久成人| av不卡在线播放| 欧美日韩精品成人综合77777| 国产色婷婷99| 国产av国产精品国产| 精品人妻偷拍中文字幕| 黑人巨大精品欧美一区二区蜜桃 | 黄色配什么色好看| 国产精品99久久99久久久不卡 | 亚洲天堂av无毛| 久久精品熟女亚洲av麻豆精品| 97在线视频观看| 日韩成人伦理影院| 亚洲欧美日韩卡通动漫| 久久久久久久久久久免费av| 男男h啪啪无遮挡| 日韩熟女老妇一区二区性免费视频| 国语对白做爰xxxⅹ性视频网站| 最新的欧美精品一区二区| 国产乱人偷精品视频| 久久人人爽av亚洲精品天堂| 成年美女黄网站色视频大全免费| 久久久久久人人人人人| 亚洲欧洲日产国产| 精品国产一区二区三区久久久樱花| 青春草国产在线视频| 精品午夜福利在线看| 女人久久www免费人成看片| 一级黄片播放器| 亚洲精品色激情综合| 精品人妻熟女毛片av久久网站| 丝袜脚勾引网站| 色婷婷av一区二区三区视频| 在线精品无人区一区二区三| 9热在线视频观看99| 亚洲伊人久久精品综合| 深夜精品福利| a 毛片基地| 女人精品久久久久毛片| 亚洲精品美女久久av网站| 国产黄色视频一区二区在线观看| 国产一区二区在线观看av| 亚洲成av片中文字幕在线观看 | 香蕉精品网在线| 男女高潮啪啪啪动态图| av.在线天堂| 精品99又大又爽又粗少妇毛片| 一级毛片电影观看| 99视频精品全部免费 在线| 啦啦啦啦在线视频资源| 国产激情久久老熟女| 人体艺术视频欧美日本| 欧美 日韩 精品 国产| 狂野欧美激情性xxxx在线观看| 亚洲欧美一区二区三区黑人 | 国产有黄有色有爽视频| 久久久久久久大尺度免费视频| 国产高清国产精品国产三级| 免费女性裸体啪啪无遮挡网站|