• 
    

    
    

      99热精品在线国产_美女午夜性视频免费_国产精品国产高清国产av_av欧美777_自拍偷自拍亚洲精品老妇_亚洲熟女精品中文字幕_www日本黄色视频网_国产精品野战在线观看

      ?

      Option Pricing and Hedging under a Markov Switching Lvy Process Model

      2017-06-05 15:01:17SONGRuiliWANGBo

      SONG Rui-li,WANG Bo

      (School of Applied Mathematics,Nanjing University of Finance and Economics,Nanjing 210023, China)

      Option Pricing and Hedging under a Markov Switching Lvy Process Model

      SONG Rui-li,WANG Bo

      (School of Applied Mathematics,Nanjing University of Finance and Economics,Nanjing 210023, China)

      In this paper,we consider a Markov switching Lvy process model in which the underlying risky assets are driven by the stochastic exponential of Markov switching Lvy process and then apply the model to option pricing and hedging.In this model,the market interest rate,the volatility of the underlying risky assets and the N-state compensator, depend on unobservable states of the economy which are modeled by a continuous-time Hidden Markov process.We use the MEMM(minimal entropy martingale measure)as the equivalent martingale measure.The option price using this model is obtained by the Fourier transform method.We obtain a closed-form solution for the hedge ratio by applying the local risk minimizing hedging.

      Markov chain model;MEMM;Lvy process;option pricing;hedging

      §1.Introduction

      In recent years,there is a considerable interest in the applications of regime switching models driven by a hidden Markov chain process to various financial problems.For an overview of hidden Markov chain processes and their financial applications[12].Some work on the use of hidden Markov chain models in finance includes[37].As a financial market model,we consider a Markov switching Lvy process model in which the risky underlying assets are driven by the stochastic exponential of Markov switching Lvy process.In this model,the market interest rate,the volatility of the underlying risky assets and the N-state compensator,depend onunobservable states of the economy which are modeled by a continuous-time Hidden Markov process.In this model,the market is incomplete in general,hence,the equivalent martingale measure is not unique.Markov switching Lvy process is discussed in[8]and there they obtained the minimal entropy martingale measure(MEMM)for Markov switching Lvy processes.Option pricing by using Fourier transform method were discussed in[912].

      In the Black-Scholes model[13],the market is assumed to be complete so that a perfect hedge can be attained by delta hedging.However,generally in an incomplete market,a perfect hedge is not attainable.F¨ollmer and Schweizer[14]propose what they refer to as a local risk-minimizing method for constructing a portfolio containing options and underlying stocks that minimizing the variance based on the physical market measure.Boyarchenko and Levendorskii[15]discuss the local risk-minimizing hedging under the exponential Lvy stock price model and find an explicit form for the hedge ratio.

      The purpose of this paper is threefold.First,we construct a Markov switching Lvy process model and then discuss the option pricing and hedging problems using this model.The model in our paper is different with the stochastic volatility model with a Lvy driving process in[11]. Second,we adopt the MEMM(minimal entropy martingale measure)as the risk neutral probability measure and provide the European option pricing formula under this measure.Finally, we apply locally risk-minimizing hedging for the Markov switching Lvy process model and present an explicit form for the hedge ratio.

      The remainder of this paper is organized as follows.In section 2,the Markov switching Lvy process model is introduced and the MEMM is obtained.In section 3,we provide the option pricing formula for the model.In section 4,we obtained the closed-form solution for the hedge ratio by applying the local risk minimizing hedging under the model.

      §2.Markov Switching Lvy Process Model

      Let(?,F,P)be a complete probability space,where P is a real-world probability measure. Denote T the time index set of[0,T].Let(Lt)t∈Tbe a real-valued Lvy process.Then for any λ∈R,we have

      where(Wt)t∈Tis a one-dimensional standard Brownian motion.For the details of Lvy processes we can refer to[1617].

      Suppose U={Ut,t≥0}is a Markov chain on the probability space(?,F,P),independent of process(Wt)t∈Tand(ΔLt)t∈Tand with a state space{e1,e2,···,eN},where

      Now suppose for each integer j with 1≤j≤N,we have aj,σjand compensator measure Πj(d x)d t.

      Let〈·,·〉denote the inner product operator and suppose that,under the probability P,the compensator of N is π(d s,d x),where

      and with a=(a1,a2,···,aN)′∈RN,σ=(σ1,σ2,···,σN)′∈RN,the drift at time s is as:=〈Us,a〉and the volatility at time s is σs:=〈Us,σ〉.

      The dynamics of the stock price process{St}t∈Tis given by the following stochastic exponential of Markov switching Lvy process

      According to Theorem 4.1 in[8],the MEMM(minimal entropy martingale measure)of the discounted stock price process is obtained by the following theorem.

      Theorem 2.1 If there is a θ=(θ1,···,θN)′∈RN,such that

      Thus define a probability measure Pθon Gtby means of the regime switching Esscher transform

      More concretely,

      Then the probability measure Pθattains the MEMM for the discounted stock price process?S with respect to FUt.

      §3.Option Pricing Under the Markov Switching Lvy Process Model

      Because the hidden Markov chain has a countable state space,the amount of time that the volatility state stays on each state enfor n=1,2,···,N from 0 to time t is given as

      where 1=(1,1,···,1)′∈RN.

      For the proof of Lemma 3.1,we can refer to Lemma 1[11].The y in Lemma 3.1 can be extended to complex field CN.

      By(2.1)~(2.2)and(3.1),we have

      where ΔXs>-1(0<s≤t).Denote Yt=ln(St/S0).Then

      Lemma 3.2 Let u∈R,such that RR|1-eiuln(1+x)|Πn(d x)<∞for every n=1,2,···,N. Denote

      Let 0≤t≤T,the conditional characteristic function of YT-Ytunder measure P and the condition Gtis given by

      By Lemma 3.1,we have

      By(2.5)and(3.1),we have

      Lemma 3.3 Let θ=(θ1,θ2,···,θN)′∈RNsatisfy the conditions(2.3)and(2.4).Let u∈R,such that RR|1-eiuln(1+x)+θnx|Πn(d x)<∞for every n=1,2,···,N.Denote

      Let 0≤t≤T,the conditional characteristic function of YT-Ytunder measure Pθand the condition Gtis given by

      By Lemma 3.1,we have

      For convenience,we define a function on C×[0,∞)where C is the complex field that

      By Lemma 3.3,we have

      Let H(ST)be a payofffunction of one European option with time to maturity T,

      Suppose r=r1=r2=···=rNand?h(η)is defined for all η∈Rh,where Rh={z∈C|Im(z)∈Ih}for some real interval Ih.The characteristic function φPθYT?Yt(η)is defined for all η∈Rφ,

      where Rφ={z∈C|Im(z)∈Iφ}for some real interval Iφ.Based on the no-arbitrage pricing framework,the European option price V with time to maturity T is given by

      Theorem 3.1 Let θ=(θ1,θ2,···,θN)′∈RNwhich satisfies the condition(2.3)and(2.4). For v∈Ih∩Iφ,we have the European option pricing formula under the Markov switching Lvy process model by

      using the complex inversion formula.

      In particular,the payofffunction of a European call option with time to maturity T and strike price K is given by H(ST)=(ST-K)+and hence h(x)=(ex-K)+.Therefore,we have

      where v<-1.By Theorem 3.1,we have

      We can compute a European put option’s price in the same way as for a European call option. A European put option’s price can be obtained by the same formula as(3.4),but the condition of v is different:that is,v is positive real number.

      §4.Local Risk-minimizing Hedge Ratio under Markov Switching Lvy Process Model

      Consider a European option with maturity T>0 and let Vtbe the European option’s price at t.Let

      at time t<T.Let ?Δt(t)be the share of the underlying stock which minimizes variance of Φt+Δt(?).That is,

      The locally risk-minimizing hedge ratio ?(t)at time t is defined as

      In this section,we assume that Ut+Δt=Utfor small Δt

      Theorem 4.1 Let θ=(θ1,θ2,···,θN)′∈RNwhich satisfies the condition(2.3)and (2.4).Let v∈R satisfy RR|x|(|(1+x)?v|+1)Πnd x<∞for all n∈1,2,···,N.The locally risk-minimizing hedging ratio is equal to

      Proof Since we have

      it minimizes at

      We have that

      Hence we have

      By Theorem 3.1,we have

      where ΔYt=Yt+Δt-Yt.Under the assumption Ut+Δt=Utfor small Δt,we have

      Γθ(u+iv,t+Δt,T)=Γθ(u+iv,t,T)(1-Δt〈(diag(yPθ(u+iv))+A)Ut,1〉)+O(ΔT2). Thus we can obtain that

      By the same argument,we obtain the second part that

      Therefore we obtain that

      By the definition of yP,we have

      for z∈C.We obtain

      Taking Δt→0,we obtain that

      [1]ELLIOTT R J,AGGOUN L,MOORE J B.Hidden Markov Models:Estimation and Control[M].Berlin Heiderberg New York:Springer,1994.

      [2]ELLIOTT R J,KOPP P E.Mathematics of Financial Markets[M].New York:Springer-Verlag,1999.

      [3]BO Li-jun,WANG Yong-jin,YANG Xue-wei.Markov-modulated jump-diffusions for currency option pricing[J].Mathematics and Economics,2010,46:461-469.

      [4]ELLIOTT R J,BUFFINGTON J.Regime switching and european options[J].Stochastic Theory and Control,2002,280:73-82.

      [5]ELLIOTT R J,CHAN L,SIU T K.Option pricing and Esscher transform under regime switching[J].Annals of Finance,2005,1:423-432.

      [6]GIUSEPPE D G,ROGERS L C G.Equity with Markov-modulated dividends[J].Quantitative Finance, 2009,9(1):19-26.

      [7]SIU T K,YANG Hai-liang,JOHN W Lau.Pricing currency options under two-factor Markov-modulated stochastic volatility models[J].Insurance:Mathematics and Economics,2008,43:295-302.

      [8]SONG Rui-li,WANG Bo.The MEMMs for Markov switching Lvy processes[J].Chinese Annals of Mathematics,2010,31A(5):549-556.

      [9]CARR P,MADAN D.Option valuation using the fast fourier transform[J].Journal of Computational Finance,1999,2(4):61-73.

      [10]KIM Y S,FABOZZI F J,LIN Zuo-dong,et al.Option pricing and hedging under a stochastic volatility Lvy process model[J].Review of Derivatives Research,2012,15(1):81-97.

      [11]LEWIS A L.A simple option formula for general jump-diffusion and other exponential Lvy processes[J]. Ssrn Electronic Journal,2002,avaible from http://www.optioncity.net.

      [12]LIU Rui-hua,ZHANG Qing,GEORGE YIN G.Option pricing in a regime switching model using the fast fourier transform[J].Journal of Applied Mathematics and Stochastic Analysis,2006,2006(3):1-22.

      [13]BLACK F,SCHOLES M.The pricing of options and corporate liabilities[J].The Journal of Political Economy,1973,81(3):637-654.

      [14]F¨OLLMER H,SCHWEIZER M.Hedging of contingent claims under incomplete information[J].Applied Stochastic Analysis,1990,5:389-414.

      [15]BOYARCHENKO S I,LEVENDORSKII S Z.Non-Gaussian Merton-Black-Scholes Theory[M].Singapore: World Scientific,2002.

      tion:60G51,60H05,94A17

      :A

      1002–0462(2017)01–0066–13

      date:2015-11-11

      Supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China(11201221);Supported by the Natural Science Foundation of Jiangsu Province(BK2012468)

      Biography:SONG Rui-li(1979-),female,native of Linyi,Shandong,an associate professor of Nanjing University of Finance and Economics,Ph.D.,engages in stochastic processes.

      CLC number:O211.6

      永昌县| 武穴市| 麦盖提县| 鄂托克前旗| 新巴尔虎左旗| 泽普县| 青神县| 韶山市| 甘洛县| 大同市| 康马县| 外汇| 北宁市| 贡嘎县| 通江县| 遵义市| 庄河市| 平乐县| 许昌县| 太仆寺旗| 广宁县| 专栏| 成都市| 甘泉县| 兴义市| 温宿县| 石台县| 团风县| 法库县| 南投市| 兴山县| 红桥区| 平塘县| 阿拉善右旗| 黔西县| 缙云县| 惠东县| 遂川县| 乌拉特前旗| 科技| 大竹县|