• <tr id="yyy80"></tr>
  • <sup id="yyy80"></sup>
  • <tfoot id="yyy80"><noscript id="yyy80"></noscript></tfoot>
  • 99热精品在线国产_美女午夜性视频免费_国产精品国产高清国产av_av欧美777_自拍偷自拍亚洲精品老妇_亚洲熟女精品中文字幕_www日本黄色视频网_国产精品野战在线观看 ?

    lnfluence of drought hardening on the resistance physiology of potato seedlings under drought stress

    2018-02-05 07:10:45ZHANGShuhanXUXuefengSUNYeminZHANGJunlianLlChaozhou
    Journal of Integrative Agriculture 2018年2期
    關(guān)鍵詞:卡夫卡抗戰(zhàn)消失

    ZHANG Shu-han, XU Xue-feng, SUN Ye-min, ZHANG Jun-lian,, Ll Chao-zhou

    1 Gansu Key Laboratory of Crop Genetics & Germplasm Enhancement, College of Life Sciences and Technology, Gansu Agricultural University, Lanzhou 730070, P.R.China

    2 College of Horticulture, Gansu Agricultural University, Lanzhou 730070, P.R.China

    1. lntroduction

    There are four major mechanisms of plant drought resistance: drought avoidance, drought tolerance, drought escape and drought recovery (Fang and Xiong 2015).Of these, drought avoidance and drought tolerance are the two primary mechanisms for survival under drought conditions. Drought avoidance refers to the ability of plants to sustain high water status by increasing water uptake or reducing water loss in dry conditions (Yueet al. 2005).For example, increasing the root/shoot ratio improves the ability to uptake water, and closing stomata reduces water loss from transpiration. The main drought avoidance traits include root morphological traits and physiological traits(such as stomatal conductance and leaf relative water content (RWC)). Drought tolerance is defined as the ability of plants to maintain a certain level of physiological activity. This is accomplished through the regulation of numerous genes (for example, those related to stress signal transduction) (Zhanget al. 2014) and a series of metabolic pathways that reduce or repair the resulting stress damage.Drought tolerance is usually associated with physiological parameters related to osmotic adjustment (such as proline(Pro), soluble sugar and abscisic acid (ABA) content) and the alleviation of drought damage (such as the activities of protective enzymes and chlorophyll content) (Luo 2010;Fang and Xiong 2015).

    In order to reduce the adverse impact of drought stress on crop production, several methods and technologies have been put to use to enhance the drought resistance of crops.Drought hardening is a convenient and feasible method and involves exposing plants to arid conditions such as reduced irrigation or partial drought during the seedling stage so as to improve the ability to adapt to subsequent serious drought(Thomas 2009; Huanget al. 2013). The effectiveness of drought hardening lies in the fact that young plants are malleable and are usually more able to survive under arid conditions if they have undergone a previous period of low moisture stress. It has been found that drought hardening applied in the nursery before planting improved the seedling survival rate under extreme xeric conditions (Driessche 1991). In addition, seedling hardening can improve the growth adaptability and drought resistance of mulberry(Huanget al. 2013). This strategy has been widely adopted in wheat, rice and other plants (Villar-Salvadoret al. 2004;Yanget al. 2015).

    Potato is the fourth most important food crop in the world,with an annual production exceeding 300 million tons, and is pivotal to agricultural production and people’s livelihood(http://faostat.fao.org/). Compared to other crops, potato is considered to be more sensitive to drought, and even a short period of stress may cause significant reduction in tuber yield (Loon 1981).

    To date, numerous studies on potato drought resistance have been reported (Zhanget al. 2014; Baniket al. 2016;Ciolocaet al. 2016; Kabira and Muthoni 2016). Most of them have focused on the physiological and biochemical responses to drought stress and the signal transduction pathways involved. In this study, we investigated drought resistance in both contrast seedlings and drought-hardened potato seedlings in terms of resistance physiology, growth status and leaf anatomical structure, and in this paper we discuss the connection between certain indexes with the aim of gaining a more comprehensive understanding of the mechanisms of drought resistance in potato seedlings after drought hardening.

    2. Materials and methods

    2.1. Plant culture and stress treatments

    Potato (Solanum tuberosumL.cv. cultivar Atlantic) tubers with one apical bud were germinated in pots (diameter in 35 cm, height in 40 cm) in a greenhouse at a temperature of(25±1)°C with a 13 h photoperiod and a photon flux density of approximately 400 μmol m-2s-1. All potato samples were divided randomly into two equal-sized groups. One group(regarded as the contrast) was watered normally, and the soil water content was maintained at approximately 15.0%by weighting before imposing drought stress. Another group was treated by the same method as the contrast group before germination and at the beginning 24 days after germination, then drought hardening was carried out for 25 days by withholding water and maintaining the soil water content at approximately 12.5%. On the 26th day the soil water content of drought hardening groups was increased to 15%, the same water content as the contrast, for 2 days.The soil water content was measured by weighing, and a moderate amount of water was added to maintain the desired soil water content. On the 28th day drought stress was imposed by withholding water from both groups. After 7 and 14 days of the drought treatment (the first day of no watering was regarded as 0 day), the second leaves from the base and white new roots of the potato seedlings were harvested for the experiments described below.

    2.2. Determination of RWC, relative electric conductivity, malondialdehyde (MDA) content and root vigor

    RWC of the potato seedling leaves was calculated as follows: RWC (%)=100×(FW–DW)/FW, where, FW is the fresh weight and DW is the dry weight (Barrs and Weatherly 1962). Relative electric conductivity of the potato seedling leaves was measured according to the method of Liuet al.(2014): thirty plant leaf wafers were placed into test tubes,10 mL distilled water were added, and tubes were sealed with plastic caps and shaken for a while so as to let the leaves immersed in distilled water. The tubes were uncapped and placed under vacuum for 10 min, and then kept for 1 h at room temperature before measuring the electrical conductance value (S1). The tubes were then placed in boiling water for 20 min, then cooled and the electrical conductance value was measured (S2). The electrical conductance value of distilled water was also measured (S3). The relative electric conductivity of the leaves was calculated using the formula: Relative electric conductivity (%)=(S1–S3)/(S2–S3)×100. MDA content was determined following the method of Heath and Packer(1968) with slight modifications. One gram of experimental material was ground in a mortar, and after adding 2 mL 10% chilled trichloroacetic acid (TCA) solution and a little quartz sand, the sample was ground further. The homogenate was centrifuged for 10 min at 4 000 r min-1,then 2 mL supernatant was placed into a test tube, and 2 mL distilled water was added to another test tube to serve as a standard for OD determination. To both tubes 2 mL 0.6% thiobarbituric acid (TBA) solution was added, and the tubes were placed in boiling water for 15 min. After cooling,the samples were centrifuged again. The supernatant was used for the determination of OD value at 532, 600, and 450 nm, respectively. The MDA concentration was calculated according to the formula: MDA concentration(μmol L-1)=6.45×(OD532–OD600)–0.56×OD450. Root vigor was determined according to the method of Liuet al. (2014).

    卡夫卡與父親站在了對(duì)立的兩方面,這種對(duì)立和反抗甚至于從未從卡夫卡的人生中消失。盡管卡夫卡本身很清楚這場(chǎng)抗戰(zhàn)本身沒(méi)有任何意義,可是卻忍不住還是像孩子一般地把這種反抗當(dāng)成了自己一生的事業(yè)。

    2.3. Determination of chlorophyll content, net photosynthetic rate (Pn), transpiration rate (Tr) and water utilization efficiency (WUE)

    Chlorophyll content was measured by the method of Arnon(1949).PnandTrwere measured between 10:30 and 11:30 in the morning using a LI-6400 portable photosynthesis system (LI-Cor, USA). WUE was calculated according to the formula: WUE (%)=Pn/Tr×100

    2.4. Determination of superoxide dismutase (SOD),catalase (CAT) and peroxidase (POD) activity

    SOD activity was determined spectrophotometrically according to the method of Spychalla and Desborough(1990). CAT activity was determined according to the method described by Lin and Wang (2002). CAT activity was measured by following the consumption of H2O2(extinction coefficient 39.4 mmol L-1cm-1) at 240 nm for 2 min. POD activity was measured following the method of Tang and Newton (2005).

    2.5. Determination of polyamines (PAs), ABA, Pro and soluble sugar content

    PAs extraction and HPLC analysis were conducted following the method of Flores and Galston (1982), and authentic standards of putrescine (Put), spermidine (Spd)and spermine (Spm) were benzoylated according to the procedure described by Flores and Galston (1982).Programmable liquid chromatography (Model Waters 600E,Waters Inc., USA) was applied to measure the concentration of these PAs. The solvent system consisted of methanol and water (65% v/v methanol) at a flow rate of 1 mL min-1.The benzoylated extracts were eluted at room temperature through a reverse-phase column (Waters Symmetry C18,3.9 mm×150 mm, 5 μm in particle size), and the absorbance at 254 nm was measured with a UV detector (Liet al. 2004).ABA content was measured according to the method of Rosset al. (2004). Pro was measured according to the method described by Bateset al. (1973). Soluble sugars were assayed by the method of Zhanget al. (2006).

    2.6. Measurement of growth and development indexes

    The main stalk height was regarded as the plant height. The stem diameter was measured at the junction between the plant and soil surface with a vernier caliper. Fibrous root number was counted visually. Root length was determined by taking the average of the length of the five longest roots.Leaf area was determined using a leaf area meter (LI-3000,LI-Cor, Inc., USA). Biomass was determined by measuring the dry weight of the whole seedling after drying in an oven at 80°C for 24 h.

    2.7. Measurement of stomatal density, stomatal size and stomatal aperture

    Stomatal measurements was done using the method of Chen and Gallie (2004) with slight modifications. Stomatal density was calculated from the average of 25 field of views in microscope per sample. Stomatal size was calculated by examining at least 50 closed stomatas per sample. The stomatal aperture was calculated from the width and length of at least 50 open stomatas per sample.

    2.8. Measurement of anatomical structure

    Anatomical structures were measured from paraffin sections:the 3rd leaf of each seedling was removed, washed with distilled water and cut into 5 mm×10 mm pieces near the midrib of the leaf. Leaf pieces were then fixed with formalinacetic acid-alcohol (FAA) fixative for 24 h, and dyed with safranin and fast green stain. Sections were observed with an Olympus microscope (CX22LED, Olympus, USA) and photographed. Indexes including leaf thickness, palisade tissue thickness and spongy parenchyma thickness were measured, and the thickness ratio of palisade tissue to spongy parenchyma was calculated.

    2.9. Statistical analysis

    All data were obtained from three or more independent replicates and were subjected to one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA). The mean differences were compared with Duncan’s multiple range test (DMRT) using SPSS statistical software (ver. 17.0 SPSS, Chicago, USA).Differences atP<0.05 were considered significant.

    3. Results

    3.1. lnfluences of drought hardening on RWC, relative electric conductivity, MDA content and root vigor

    A sharp decrease in the RWC of the contrast potato seedling leaves was observed when the drought stress lasted 14 days,but the reduction in the RWC of drought-hardened seedlings was lower relative to contrast seedlings (Fig. 1-A). Leaf relative electric conductivity and MDA content increased with drought stress, yet less of an increase was observed in the drought-hardened seedlings. For instance, the relative electric conductivity of the seedling leaves treated with drought hardening was 24.7% lower than the contrast when drought stress lasted 7 days and 6.0% lower at the 14th day(Fig. 1-B). MDA content of the drought-hardened seedling leaves was 10.4 and 9.2% lower than the contrast when the stress lasted 7 and 14 days, respectively (Fig. 1-C). Root vigor of drought-hardened seedlings increased significantly and was 13.6 and 9.5% higher than the contrast when the stress lasted 7 and 14 days, respectively (P<0.05) (Fig. 1-D).

    3.2. lnfluences of drought hardening on chlorophyll content, Pn, Tr and WUE

    Fig. 1 Influence of drought hardening on the relative water content, relative electric conductivity and malondialdehyde (MDA)content of potato seedling leaves and potato seedling root vigor under drought stress. DW, dry weight. Bar means standand error.Different lowercase letters indicate significant differences between groups at the P<0.05 level.

    Chlorophyll content decreased with prolonged drought, but there was less of a decrease observed in drought-hardened seedlings, chlorophyll content in drought-hardened seedlings was 5.3 and 29.7% higher than the contrast when drought stress lasted 7 and 14 days, respectively (P>0.05)(Fig. 2-A).Pnwas significantly reduced when the drought stress lasted 7 and 14 days, but drought hardening treatment alleviated the reduction;Pnwas 41.7 and 154.2% higher than the contrast when drought stress lasted 7 and 14 days,respectively (Fig. 2-B).

    With prolonged drought stress, a significant decrease in theTrwas observed in both drought-hardened and contrast potato seedling leaves. When drought stress lasted 14 days, theTrof the drought-hardened potato seedling leaves was 3.9% lower than the contrast. WUE of the drought-hardened potato leaves was much higher than the contrast when the drought stress lasted 14 days(P<0.05) (Fig. 2-C and D).

    3.3. lnfluences of drought hardening on SOD, CAT and POD activity

    The activities of SOD, POD and CAT in potato seedling leaves increased when the drought stress lasted 7 days,then decreased at the 14th day in the contrast (Fig. 3-AC). Prior to drought stress (0 day), drought hardening significantly increased the activities of POD and CAT(P<0.05) (Fig. 3-B and-C). SOD activity also increased, but this increase was not significant (P>0.05) (Fig. 3-A). The activities of SOD, POD and CAT in the drought-hardened potato seedlings were lower than the contrast when the stress lasted 7 days, but higher than the contrast when the stress lasted 14 days (P>0.05) (Fig. 3-A-C).

    3.4. lnfluences of drought hardening on PAs and ABA content

    Put, Spm and Spd are the three most important PAs in plants. In the contrast, the levels of Put, Spm and Spd increased significantly when drought stress lasted 7 days and then decreased significantly when the stress lasted 14 days (P<0.05) (Fig. 4-A-C). Drought hardening treatment increased the levels of Put, Spm and Spd significantly in the leaves when the drought stress lasted 14 days (P<0.05);levels were 116.2, 69.2 and 183.6% higher than the contrast,respectively. Drought hardening increased the ABA content before drought stress (0 day), and when the stress lasted 14 days, the ABA content in the drought hardening-treated seedling leaves was still significantly higher than the contrast(P<0.05) (Fig. 4-D).

    Fig. 2 Influence of drought hardening on the chlorophyll content, net photosynthetic rate (Pn), transpiration rate (Tr) and water utilization efficiency (WUE) of potato seedling leaves under drought stress. Bar means standard error. Different lowercase letters indicate significant differences between groups at the P<0.05 level.

    Fig. 3 Influence of drought hardening on the activities of superoxide dismutase (SOD),peroxidase (POD) and catalase (CAT) in potato seedling leaves under drought stress. Bar means standard error. Different lowercase letters indicate significant differences between groups at the P<0.05 level.

    Fig. 4 Influence of drought hardening on the levels of polyamines (PAs) and abscisic acid (ABA) in potato seedling leaves under drought stress. Put, putrescine; Spm, spermine; Spd, spermidine. Bar means standard error. Different lowercase letters indicate significant differences between groups at the P<0.05 level.

    3.5. lnfluences of drought hardening on Pro and soluble sugar content

    There was a significant increase in the levels of Pro and soluble sugars with prolonged drought stress, and the drought hardening treatment markedly enhanced the levels of Pro and soluble sugars compared to the contrast (P<0.05).For instance, when the stress lasted 14 days, the levels of Pro and soluble sugars in the drought-hardened potato seedling leaves were 24.4 and 11.7% higher, respectively,than the contrast (Fig. 5-A and B).

    3.6. lnfluences of drought hardening on growth and development indexes

    Plant height, stem diameter, fibrous root number, root length and leaf area in both the contrast and drought-hardened potato seedlings increased gradually over time. Drought hardening increased the stem diameter, fibrous root number and root length relative to the contrast when the stress lasted 7 and 14 days, whereas the plant height and leaf area indices were reduced. For instance, fibrous root number and root length were 13.0 and 13.7% higher than the contrast,respectively, when the stress lasted 14 days, while leaf area was 14.7% lower than the contrast. When the drought stress lasted 14 days, the biomass and the root-shoot ratio of the drought hardening treated potato seedlings were significantly higher than the contrast (P<0.05) (Table 1).

    3.7. lnfluences of drought hardening on stomatal density, stomatal size and stomatal aperture

    The stomatal density of potato seedling leaves increased while stomatal size and stomatal aperture decreased significantly during drought stress. Drought hardening treatment reinforced this trend. For instance, when the stress lasted 0, 7 and 14 days, the stomatal aperture width of drought-hardened seedlings was reduced by 2.2, 9.9 and 22.0%, respectively, compared with the contrast (Table 2).

    3.8. lnfluences of drought hardening on anatomical structure

    In the contrast seedling leaves, there was a slight decrease in leaf thickness as the drought stress progressed, and there was a significant decrease in the thickness of the spongy parenchyma and a significant increase in the thickness of the palisade tissue and the palisade tissue to spongy parenchyma ratio (P<0.05). Drought hardening treatment also significantly increased the thickness of palisade tissue(P<0.05) compared with the contrast. The palisade tissue to spongy parenchyma ratio also increased compared with the contrast, but this increase was not significant (P>0.05)(Table 3).

    4. Discussion

    Fig. 5 Influence of drought hardening on the content of proline and soluble sugars in potato seedling leaves under drought stress.Bar means standard error. Different lowercase letters indicate significant differences between groups at the P<0.05 level.

    MDA is a by-product of lipid peroxidation and is often used as an index of oxidative stress (Oralet al. 2006; G?belet al. 2009). In this paper, we showed that the change in relative electric conductivity and MDA content followed similar trends under drought stress and both indices were comparatively lower in drought-hardened than contrast samples (Fig. 1-B and C). Consistent with this, antioxidant enzyme activity in drought-hardened potato seedling leaves was markedly higher than contrast seedlings prior to drought stress (Fig. 3-A-C). After 7 to 14 days of drought stress, drought hardening reduced the decline in the activity of three antioxidant enzymes (SOD, POD,CAT) compared to the contrast. These results indicate that drought-hardened potato seedlings have a higher ability to reduce ROS accumulation and thus maintain the stability of the membrane system and alleviate the damage induced by drought stress. We concluded that drought hardening enhanced drought resistance in potato seedling leavesviaimproving the activity of the antioxidant enzymes.

    PAs, primarily consisting of Spd, Spm and their diamine precursor, Put, are low-molecular-weight aliphatic polycations that are widespread and found in almost all living organisms (Bohraet al. 2015). Being positively charged at physiological pH, they can interact with various cellular macromolecules, such as nucleic acids,proteins, membrane phospholipids and thus regulate many fundamental cellular processes (Martin-Tanguy 2001; Shiet al. 2010; Fiscalettiet al. 2013). It has been reportedthat PAs frequently accumulate in response to biotic and abiotic stresses (Chattopadhayayet al. 2002; Kubi? 2008;Kusanoet al. 2008; Alcázaret al. 2010) and could act as signaling molecules, resulting in the alleviation of negative drought effects (Kubi?et al. 2014). When encountering environmental stresses, such as water deficit, plants accumulate a large number of amine substances to promote the activities of scavenging enzymes, slow down the process of lipid peroxidation, and maintain plasma membrane integrity (Shenet al. 2000; Liuet al. 2007). In this study we found that the levels of Put, Spm and Spd increased after 7 days drought stress then decreased after 14 days in the contrast seedlings (Fig. 4-A-C). Drought hardening treatment prevented the decrease in PAs content and markedly increased PAs content compared to the contrast at the 14th day (P<0.05) (Fig. 4-A-C), and thus improved the drought resistance of the potato seedlings.

    Table 1 Influence of drought hardening on the growth and development of potato seedlings under drought stress

    Table 2 Influence of drought hardening on the stomatal density, stomatal size and stomatal aperture of potato seedling leaves under drought stress

    Table 3 Influence of drought hardening on the anatomical structure of potato seedling leaves under drought stress

    Among the phytohormones, ABA plays a major role in the response of plants to environmental stresses, such as water stress and extreme temperature stress (Sauteret al.2001; Bray 2002; Finkelsteinet al. 2002), and it is one of the key factors regulating stomatal behavior. ABA curtails transpirational water loss by promoting stomatal closure,which limits gas and water exchange between the interior of leaves and the atmosphere, and thus prevents water loss (Bhargava and Sawant 2013; Hernándezet al. 2013;Koffleret al. 2014). Thus higher ABA concentrations during drought stress help to maintain water status in plants (Duanet al. 2008; Zhanget al. 2010). Endogenous ABA content increases rapidly even up to 30-fold during drought stress and improves drought tolerance by enhancing osmotic adjustment and inducing stomatal closure (Acharya and Assmann 2009; Penget al. 2012; Bhargava and Sawant 2013). We showed that drought hardening increased ABA content in the potato seedling leaves before drought stress,and after 14 days of drought stress the ABA content in the leaves of drought-hardened plants was still 30.6% higher than the contrast (P<0.05) (Fig. 4-D). Similarly, theTrwas sharply reduced at the 14th day (Fig. 2-C). The result suggests that, the increase in ABA content after drought hardening enhance the ability of potato seedlings to adapt to drought stress by inducing stomatal closure to reduce water lossviatranspiration.

    Smaller stomata can open and close more rapidly and their general association with high stomatal densities provides the capacity for rapid increase in leaf stomatal conductance and maximizes CO2diffusion into the leaf(Aasamaaet al. 2001). In this paper, drought hardening treatment increased stomatal density and reduced stomatal size and aperture (Table 2), and thus reduced leaf transpiration rate and improved WUE (Fig. 2-C and D). This should have a positive effect on potato seedlings growth and development. Consistent with this, drought hardening increased biomass (Table 1) and root vigor (Fig. 1-D) relative to the contrast.

    Leaves are the action centers of photosynthesis in higher plants and have the largest area exposed to the environment among plant organs (Liuet al. 2016 ). The long-term influence of arid environments alters leaf morphology (Gaoet al. 2003). Plants have evolved many leaf structural adaptations to protect against and minimize water loss under limited moisture conditions (Hameedet al. 2012).Thicker plant leaves result in a higher water storage capacity,which prevents excessive transpiration and guarantees a higher WUE. Palisade tissue provides mechanical support for leaves and can prevent moisture loss, whereas spongy parenchyma can store a lot of water and efficiently avoid leaf blight caused by drought. To survive under long-term water shortages, the thickness of palisade tissue increased and the thickness of spongy parenchyma decreased(Chartzoulakiset al. 2002). We found a significant increase in the thickness of the palisade tissue and in the ratio of palisade tissue to spongy parenchyma during drought stress, and these increases were even higher after drought hardening treatment (Table 3). These results indicate that better-developed potato leaf palisade tissue might have less mechanical damage under drought stress conditions.

    Plants have evolved several mechanisms to manage the damaging effects of abiotic stresses, and there exists a positive compensation mechanism in plants under drought stress. Photosynthetically active radiation is absorbed by chlorophyll, and a higher chlorophyll content under water stress conditions is believed to result in more efficient use of light energy (Guoet al. 2008). We observed that, compared with contrast seedlings, drought hardening increased the RWC, chlorophyll content andPnof potato seedling leaves under drought stress (Fig. 1-A and Fig. 2-A and B). High leaf WUE is a water-saving strategy allowing plants to maintain strong drought tolerance (Wu and Bao 2012). It is generally believed that reduced transpiration and increased photosynthesis jointly lead to improvement in leaf WUE. In our experiment, when the stress lasted 14 days, theTrof the drought-hardened potato seedling leaves was 3.9% lower than the contrast, while thePnwas about 154.2% higher than the contrast on the same day (Fig. 2-B and C), thus resulting in an evident increase in leaf WUE (Fig. 2-D).

    5. Conclusion

    With drought hardening treatment, leaf area, stomatal size,stomatal aperture as well as theTrwere reduced, so the reduction of water content caused by drought stress was alleviated; bothPnand WUE were improved; these changes may be beneficial for plant growth. Furthermore, drought hardening treatment enhanced the levels of PAs, ABA, Pro and soluble sugars and the activities of antioxidant enzymes in seedling leaves, thus improving the resistance physiology of potato seedlings. In a word, drought hardening improves the drought resistance of potato seedlings by impacting aspects of leaf microstructure and anatomical structure, the levels of endogenous hormones, osmotic adjustment and antioxidant enzyme activity.

    Acknowledgements

    The work was supported by the China Agricultural Research System (CARS-09-P14), the Science and Technology Support Project of Gansu Provincial Sci. & Tech.Department, China (1604NKCAa52-3).

    Aasamaa K, Sober A, Rahi M. 2001. Leaf anatomical characteristics associated with shoot hydraulic conductance,stomatal conductance and stomatal sensitivity to changes of leaf water status in temperate deciduous trees.Australian Journal of Plant Physiology, 28, 765–774.

    Acharya B R, Assmann S M. 2009. Hormone interactions in stomatal function.Plant Molecular Biology, 69, 451–462.

    Adams H D, Guardiola-Claramonte M, Barron-Gafford G A,Villegas J C, Huxman T E. 2009. Temperature sensitivity of drought-induced tree mortality portends increased regional die-off under global-change-type drought.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 106, 7063–7066.

    Alcázar R, Altabella T, Marco F, Bortolotti C, Reymond M,Tiburcio A F. 2010. Polyamines: Molecules with regulatory functions in plant abiotic stress tolerance.Planta, 231,1237–1249.

    Anirban G, Debashree S, Girish K R, Attipalli R R. 2010. An integrated diagnostic approach to understand drought tolerance in mulberry (Morus indicaL.).Flora, 205, 144–151.

    Apel K, Hirt H. 2004. Reactive oxygen species: Metabolism,oxidative stress, and signal transduction.Annual Review of Plant Biology, 55, 373–399.

    Arnon D T. 1949. Copper enzymes in isolated chloroplasts polyphenaloxidase in Beta vulgaris.Plant Physiology, 24,1–15.

    Banik P, Zeng W, Tai H, Bizimungu B, Tanino K. 2016. Effects of drought acclimation on drought stress resistance in potato (Solanum tuberosumL.) genotypes.Environmental& Experimental Botany, 126, 76–89.

    Barrs H D, Weatherly P E. 1962. A re-examination of relative turgidity for estimating water deficits in leaves.Australian Journal of Biological Sciences, 15, 413–428.

    Bartels D, Sunkar R. 2005. Drought and salt tolerance in plants.Critical Reviews in Plant Sciences, 24, 23–58.

    Bates L S, Waldren R P, Teare I D. 1973. Rapid determination of free proline for water stress studies.Plant Soil, 39, 205–207.

    Benjamin J G, Nielsen D C. 2006. Water deficit effects on root distribution of soybean, field pea and chickpea.Field Crops Research, 97, 248–253.

    Bhargava S, Sawant K. 2013. Drought stress adaptation:Metabolic adjustment and regulation of gene expression.Plant Breeding, 132, 21–32.

    Bohra A, Sanadhya D, Bhatia D S. 2015. Polyamines:Metabolism and role in abiotic stress amelioration.Journal of Plant Science Research, 31, 183–195.

    Bray E A. 2002. Abscisic acid regulation of gene expression during water-deficit stress in the era of theArabidopsisgenome.Plant Cell & Environment, 25, 153–161.

    Budak H, Kantar M, Kurtoglu K Y. 2013. Drought tolerance in modern and wild wheat.The Scientific World Journal,2013, 548246.

    Chartzoulakis K, Patakas A, Kofidis G, Bosabalidis A, Nastou A. 2002. Water stress affects leaf anatomy, gas exchange,water relations and growth of two avocado cultivars.Scientia Horticulturae, 95, 39–50.

    Chattopadhayay M K, Tiwari B S, Chattopadhayay G, Bose A,Sengupta D N, Ghosh B. 2002. Protective role of exogenous polyamines on salinity-stressed rice (Oriza sativa) plants.Physiology Plant, 116, 192–199.

    Chen Z, Gallie D R. 2004. The ascorbic acid redox state contrasts guard cell signaling and stomatal movement.The Plant Cell, 116, 1143–1162.

    Chutipaijit S. 2016. Changes in physiological and antioxidant activity of indica rice seedlings in response to mannitolinduced osmotic stress.Chilean Journal of Agricultural Research, 76, 455–462.

    Cioloca M A, Tican A M, Iano?i M, B?d?r?u C L. 2016. The growth response of several potato genotypes (Solanum tuberosumL.) to induced water stress using sorbitol and polyethylene glycol.Notulae Scientia Biologicae, 8,511–519.

    Van den Driessche R. 1991. Influence of container nursery regimes on drought resistance of seedlings following planting. I. Survival and growth.Canadian Journal of Forest Research, 21, 555–565.

    Duan B, Xuan Z, Zhang X, Korpelainen H, Li C. 2008.Interactions between drought, ABA application and supplemental UV-B inPopulus yunnanensis.Physiology Plant, 134, 257–269.

    Fang Y J, Xiong L Z. 2015. General mechanisms of drought response and their application in drought resistance improvement in plants.Cellular & Molecular Life Sciences Cmls, 72, 673–689.

    Finkelstein R R, Gampala S S, Rock C D. 2002. Abscisic acid signaling in seeds and seedlings.The Plant Cell,14(Suppl.14), S15.

    Fiscaletti D, Angeli D, Tarozzi L, Barozzi G S. 2013. Plant polyamines in abiotic stress responses.Acta Physiologiae Plantarum, 35, 2015–2036.

    Flores H E, Galston A W. 1982. Analysis of polymines in higher plants by high performance liquid chromatography.PlantPhysiology, 69, 701–706.

    Foyer C H, Noctor G. 2005. Oxidant and antioxidant signalling in plants: A re-evaluation of the concept of oxidative stress in a physiological context.Plant Cell & Environment, 28,1056–1071.

    Gao J P, Wang Y H, Chen D F. 2003. Anatomical characteristics of leaf epidermis and vessel elements ofSchisandra sphenantherafrom different districts and their relationships to environmental factors.Acta Botanica Boreali-occidentalia Sinica, 23, 715–723.

    Gill S S, Tuteja N. 2010. Reactive oxygen species and antioxidant machinery in abiotic stress tolerance in crop plants.Plant Physiology & Biochemistry, 48, 909–930.

    G?bel C, Feussner I, Hause B, Wasternack C, Strack D.2009. Methods for the analysis of oxylipins in plants.Phytochemistry, 70, 1485–1503.

    Guo P, Michael B, Rajeevk V, Andreas G, Stefania G, Salvatore C. 2008. QTLs for chlorophyll and chlorophyll fluorescence parameters in barley under post-flowering drought.Euphytica, 163, 203–214.

    Hameed M, Batool S, Naz N, Nawaz T, Ashraf M. 2012. Leaf structural modifications for drought tolerance in some differentially adapted ecotypes of blue panic (Panicum antidotaleretz.).Acta Physiologiae Plantarum, 34,1479–1491.

    Heath R L, Packer L. 1968. Photoperoxidation in isolated chloroplast. I. Kinetics and stoichiometry of fatty acid peroxidation.Archives of Biochemistry & Biophysics, 125,189–198.

    Henricks P A, Nijkamp F P. 2001. Reactive oxygen species as mediators in asthma.Pulmonary Pharmacology &Therapeutics, 14, 409–420.

    Hernández I, Cela J, Alegre L, Munnébosch S. 2013. Antioxidant defenses against drought stress. In: Aroca R, ed.,Plant Responses to Drought Stress. Springer-Verlag, Berlin,Heidelberg. pp. 231–258.

    Huang X H, Liu Y, Li J X, Xiong X Z, Chen Y, Yin X H, Feng D L. 2013. The response of mulberry trees after seedling hardening to summer drought in the hydro-fluctuation belt of three gorges reservoir areas.Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 20, 7103–7111.

    Kabira J N, Muthoni J. 2016. Potato production under drought conditions: Identification of adaptive traits.International Journal of Horticulture, 6, 1–9.

    Koffler B E, Luschin-Ebengreuth N, Stabentheiner E, Müller M, Zechmann B. 2014. Compartment specific response of antioxidants to drought stress inArabidopsis.Plant Science,227, 133–144.

    Kubi? J. 2005. The effect of exogenous spermidine on superoxide dismutase activity, H2O2and superoxide radical level in barley leaves under water deficit conditions.Acta Physiologiae Plantarum, 27, 289–295.

    Kubi? J. 2008. Exogenous spermidine alters in different ways activities of some scavenging system enzymes, H2O2and superoxide radical levels in water stressed cucumber leaves.Journal of Plant Physiology, 165, 397–406.

    Kubi? J, Floryszak-Wieczorek J, Arasimowicz-Jelonek M. 2014.Polyamines induce adaptive responses in water deficit stressed cucumber roots.Journal of Plant Research, 127,151–158.

    Kusano T, Berberich T, Tateda C, Takahashi Y. 2008.Polyamines: Essential factors for growth and survival.Planta, 228, 367–381.

    Langebartels C, Wohlgemuth H, Kschieschan S, Grün S,Sandermann H. 2002. Oxidative burst and cell death in ozone-exposed plants.Plant Physiology & Biochemistry,40, 567-575.

    Li C Z, Jiao J, Wang G X. 2004. The important roles of reactive oxygen species in the relationship between ethylene and polyamines in leaves of spring wheat seedlings under root osmotic stress.Plant Science, 166, 303–315.

    Lin J S, Wang G X. 2002. Double CO2could improve the drought tolerance better in sensitive cultivars than in tolerant cultivars in spring wheat.Plant Science, 163, 627–637.

    Liu J H, Kitashiba H, Wang J, Ban Y, Moriguchi T. 2007.Polyamines and their ability to provide environmental stress tolerance.Plant Biotechnology, 24, 117–126.

    Liu J J, Wei Z, Li J H. 2014. Effects of copper on leaf membrane structure and root activity of maize seedling.Botanical Studies, 55, 47.

    Liu Q, Li Z H, Wu J Y. 2016. Research progress on leaf anatomical structures of plants under drought stress.Agricultural Science & Technology, 17, 4–7, 14.

    Loon C D V. 1981. The effect of water stress on potato growth,development, and yield.American Journal of Potato Research, 58, 51–69.

    Luo L J. 2010. Breeding for water-saving and droughtresistancerice (WDR) in China.Journal of Experimental Botany, 61, 3509–3517.

    Martin-Tanguy J. 2001. Metabolism and function of polyamines in plants: Recent development (new approaches).Plant Growth Regulation, 34, 135–148.

    Oral O, Kutlu T, Aksoy E, F???c?o?lu C, Uslu H, Tu?rul S. 2006.The effects of oxidative stress on outcomes of assisted reproductive techniques.Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics, 2, 81–85.

    Peng S, Jiang H, Zhang S, Chen L H, Li X G, Korpelainen H, Li C Y. 2012. Transcriptional profiling reveals sexual differences of the leaf transcriptomes in response to drought stress inPopulus yunnanensis.Tree Physiology, 32, 1541–1555.

    Ravikumar G, Manimaran P, Voleti S R, Balachandran S M. 2014. Stress-inducible expression of AtDREB1A transcription factor greatly improves drought stress tolerance in transgenic indica rice.Transgenic Research,23, 421–439.

    Ross A R, Ambrose S J, Cutler A J, Feurtado J A, Kermode A R, Nelson K, Zhou R, Abrams S R. 2004. Determination of endogenous and supplied deuterated abscisic acid in plant tissues by high-performance liquid chromatographyelectrospray ionization tandem mass spectrometry with multiple reaction monitoring.Analytical Biochemistry, 329,324–333.

    Sato Y, Yokoya S. 2008. Enhanced tolerance to drought stress in transgenic rice plants overexpressing a small heat-shock protein, shsp17.7.Plant Cell Reports, 27, 329–334.

    Sauter A, Davies W J, Hart W. 2001. The long-distance abscisic acid signal in the droughted plant: The fate of the hormone on its way from root to shoot.Journal of Experimental Botany, 52, 1991–1997.

    Serraj R, Kumar A, Mcnally K L, Slametloedin I, Bruskiewich R, Mauleon R, Cairns J, Hijmans R J. 2009. Improvement of drought resistance in rice.Advances in Agronomy, 103,41–99.

    Shen W, Nada K, Tachibana S. 2000. Involvement of polyamines in the chilling tolerance of cucumber cultivars.Plant Physiology, 124, 431–439.

    Shi J, Fu X Z, Peng T, Huang X S, Fan Q J, Liu J H. 2010.Spermine pretreatment cinfers dehydration tolerance of citrusin vitroplantsviamodulation of antioxidative capacity and stomatal response.Tree Physiology, 30, 914–922.

    Siedlinski M, van Diemen C C, Postma D S, Vonk J M, Boezen H M. 2009. Superoxide dismutases, lung function and bronchial responsiveness in a general population.European Respiratory Journal, 33, 986–992.

    Spychalla J P, Desborough S L. 1990. Superoxide dismutase,catalase and alpha tocopherol content of stored potato tubers.Plant Physiology, 94, 1214–1218.

    Tang W, Newton R J. 2005. Peroxidase and catalase activities are involved in direct adventitious shoot formation induced by thidiazuron in eastern white pine (Pinus strobusL.)zygotic embryos.Plant Physiology Biochemistry, 43,760–769.

    Thomas D S. 2009. Survival and growth of drought hardenedEucalyptus pilularisSm. seedlings and vegetative cuttings.New Forests, 38, 245–259.

    Uzilday B I, Turkan, A H, Sekmen R, Ozgur, Karakaya H C. 2012.Comparison of ROS formation and antioxidantenzymes inCleome gynandra(C4) andCleome spinosa(C3) under drought stress.Plant Science, 182, 59–70.

    Villar-Salvador P, Planelles R, Peňuelar-Rubira J. 2004.Drought tolerance and transplanting performance of holm oak (Quercus ilex) seedlings after drought hardening in the nursery.Tree Physiology, 24, 1147–1155.

    Wang W, Vinocur B, Altman A. 2003. Plant responses to drought, salinity and extreme temperatures: Towards genetic engineering for stress tolerance.Planta, 218, 1–14.

    Wu X L, Bao W K. 2012. Statistical analysis of leaf water use efficiency and physiology traits of winter wheat under drought condition.Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 11,82–89.

    Yang S L, Chen K, Wang S S, Gong M. 2015. Osmoregulation as a key factor in drought hardening-induced drought tolerance inJatropha curcas.Biologia Plantarum, 59,529–536.

    Yue B, Xiong L, Xue W, Xing Y, Luo L, Xu C. 2005. Genetic analysis for drought resistance of rice at reproductive stage in field with different types of soil.Theoretical and Applied Genetics, 111, 1127–1136.

    Zhang N, Liu B L, Ma C Y, Zhang G D, Chang J, Si H J, Wang D. 2014. Transcriptome characterization and sequencingbased identification of drought-responsive genes in potato.Molecular Biology Reports, 41, 505–517.

    Zhang S, Chen F, Peng S, Ma W, Korpelainen H, Li C. 2010.Comparative physiological, ultrastructural and proteomic analyses reveal sexual differences in the responses ofPopulus cathayanaunder drought stress.Proteomics, 10,2661–2677.

    Zhang Z J, Li H Z, Zhou W J, Takeuchi Y, Yoneyama K. 2006.Effect of 5-aminolevulinic acid on development and salt tolerance of potato (Solanum tuberosumL.) microtubersin vitro.Plant Growth Regulation, 49, 27–34.

    猜你喜歡
    卡夫卡抗戰(zhàn)消失
    《卡夫卡傳》
    卡夫卡就是布拉格,布拉格就是卡夫卡
    文苑(2020年12期)2020-04-13 00:55:00
    關(guān)于卡夫卡和《變形記》你不知道的故事
    文苑(2020年12期)2020-04-13 00:55:00
    和這個(gè)世界格格不入,是時(shí)候看看卡夫卡了
    文苑(2020年12期)2020-04-13 00:54:54
    我們家的抗戰(zhàn)
    湘潮(2018年8期)2018-12-04 18:08:12
    憶·抗戰(zhàn)
    抗戰(zhàn)音畫(huà)
    抗戰(zhàn),在未被占領(lǐng)的中國(guó)
    齊魯周刊(2015年31期)2015-08-19 09:42:18
    消失的童年
    美永不消失
    吐魯番(2014年2期)2014-02-28 16:54:44
    欧美最新免费一区二区三区| 五月伊人婷婷丁香| 久久久久久久久大av| 自拍欧美九色日韩亚洲蝌蚪91| 免费av中文字幕在线| 人人澡人人妻人| 国产在视频线精品| 99热全是精品| 欧美日韩亚洲高清精品| 99久久精品一区二区三区| 人人妻人人爽人人添夜夜欢视频| 免费观看在线日韩| 国产一区二区三区av在线| 十分钟在线观看高清视频www| 一级a做视频免费观看| 久久人人爽av亚洲精品天堂| 国产成人精品福利久久| 蜜臀久久99精品久久宅男| 日本猛色少妇xxxxx猛交久久| 最后的刺客免费高清国语| 国精品久久久久久国模美| 国产精品久久久久久精品电影小说| 欧美亚洲日本最大视频资源| 日韩电影二区| 成人免费观看视频高清| 男女边摸边吃奶| 亚洲国产精品专区欧美| 中文字幕最新亚洲高清| 一区二区三区乱码不卡18| 麻豆乱淫一区二区| 久久久久久久亚洲中文字幕| 国产成人freesex在线| 天堂中文最新版在线下载| 中文欧美无线码| 大码成人一级视频| av在线播放精品| 国产精品一区www在线观看| 狠狠精品人妻久久久久久综合| av在线老鸭窝| 在线播放无遮挡| .国产精品久久| 婷婷色麻豆天堂久久| 美女国产视频在线观看| 99九九线精品视频在线观看视频| 夜夜骑夜夜射夜夜干| 国产无遮挡羞羞视频在线观看| 国产一区有黄有色的免费视频| 十八禁网站网址无遮挡| 久久免费观看电影| 黑人高潮一二区| av在线播放精品| 久久久久国产精品人妻一区二区| 精品亚洲成a人片在线观看| 亚洲性久久影院| 我的老师免费观看完整版| 最黄视频免费看| 多毛熟女@视频| 美女内射精品一级片tv| 热re99久久精品国产66热6| 在线观看一区二区三区激情| 看十八女毛片水多多多| 久久99精品国语久久久| 国产成人免费观看mmmm| 精品久久久久久电影网| 男女国产视频网站| 日韩强制内射视频| 成人无遮挡网站| 建设人人有责人人尽责人人享有的| 国产一区有黄有色的免费视频| 精品酒店卫生间| 亚洲精品日韩在线中文字幕| 97超视频在线观看视频| 国产国拍精品亚洲av在线观看| 国产精品久久久久久av不卡| 日韩一区二区三区影片| 亚洲精品久久成人aⅴ小说 | 日本色播在线视频| 色哟哟·www| 最后的刺客免费高清国语| 99久久精品国产国产毛片| 18禁动态无遮挡网站| 99久久精品一区二区三区| 夫妻性生交免费视频一级片| 亚洲精品日韩av片在线观看| 亚洲欧洲精品一区二区精品久久久 | 精品久久久久久电影网| 国产av国产精品国产| 纯流量卡能插随身wifi吗| 国产精品人妻久久久久久| 成年美女黄网站色视频大全免费 | 久久精品夜色国产| 又黄又爽又刺激的免费视频.| 国产欧美亚洲国产| 亚洲色图 男人天堂 中文字幕 | 国产一区二区三区综合在线观看 | 精品亚洲乱码少妇综合久久| 熟女电影av网| 精品久久久久久电影网| 日本猛色少妇xxxxx猛交久久| 好男人视频免费观看在线| 国产精品久久久久久精品古装| 久热这里只有精品99| 免费观看av网站的网址| 精品久久久久久电影网| av卡一久久| 狠狠精品人妻久久久久久综合| 麻豆成人av视频| 午夜日本视频在线| 精品久久国产蜜桃| av女优亚洲男人天堂| 日本91视频免费播放| 久久精品人人爽人人爽视色| 国产熟女午夜一区二区三区 | 18禁观看日本| 国产毛片在线视频| 一二三四中文在线观看免费高清| 老司机亚洲免费影院| 国产高清三级在线| 熟女电影av网| 亚洲综合色惰| 91精品国产国语对白视频| 国产无遮挡羞羞视频在线观看| 精品久久久噜噜| 亚洲中文av在线| 蜜臀久久99精品久久宅男| 高清av免费在线| 国语对白做爰xxxⅹ性视频网站| 特大巨黑吊av在线直播| 久久鲁丝午夜福利片| 国产成人精品久久久久久| 亚洲av成人精品一二三区| 日本av手机在线免费观看| 一级黄片播放器| 日韩精品免费视频一区二区三区 | av视频免费观看在线观看| 美女脱内裤让男人舔精品视频| 免费播放大片免费观看视频在线观看| 国产高清有码在线观看视频| 中文字幕免费在线视频6| 人妻一区二区av| 汤姆久久久久久久影院中文字幕| √禁漫天堂资源中文www| 免费观看的影片在线观看| 日日啪夜夜爽| 国产有黄有色有爽视频| 最近最新中文字幕免费大全7| 丝袜美足系列| 日日啪夜夜爽| 高清午夜精品一区二区三区| 各种免费的搞黄视频| 日韩免费高清中文字幕av| 99久久人妻综合| 性高湖久久久久久久久免费观看| 看非洲黑人一级黄片| 日韩成人av中文字幕在线观看| 久久精品久久久久久久性| 国产成人午夜福利电影在线观看| 亚洲av国产av综合av卡| 国产男女内射视频| 99久久综合免费| 蜜桃久久精品国产亚洲av| 国产在线免费精品| 少妇丰满av| 大码成人一级视频| av不卡在线播放| 国产日韩欧美视频二区| 一级爰片在线观看| 两个人的视频大全免费| 五月伊人婷婷丁香| 亚洲高清免费不卡视频| 最近的中文字幕免费完整| 久久精品熟女亚洲av麻豆精品| 国产成人精品无人区| 亚洲国产欧美在线一区| 日本欧美国产在线视频| 精品一品国产午夜福利视频| 最新中文字幕久久久久| 亚洲精品日本国产第一区| 色5月婷婷丁香| 亚洲国产av新网站| 最近2019中文字幕mv第一页| 波野结衣二区三区在线| 亚洲欧洲精品一区二区精品久久久 | 久久婷婷青草| 免费观看a级毛片全部| 夜夜骑夜夜射夜夜干| 国产精品人妻久久久久久| 日本与韩国留学比较| 丰满迷人的少妇在线观看| 99热这里只有是精品在线观看| 麻豆成人av视频| 成人黄色视频免费在线看| 日本爱情动作片www.在线观看| 婷婷成人精品国产| 伦理电影大哥的女人| 极品人妻少妇av视频| 能在线免费看毛片的网站| 免费黄频网站在线观看国产| 在线看a的网站| 国产精品免费大片| 国产视频内射| 亚洲中文av在线| 日本午夜av视频| 国产综合精华液| 妹子高潮喷水视频| 国产成人精品福利久久| 色婷婷av一区二区三区视频| av女优亚洲男人天堂| 免费少妇av软件| 一级,二级,三级黄色视频| 久久影院123| 人妻系列 视频| 欧美日本中文国产一区发布| 婷婷色麻豆天堂久久| 欧美日韩视频高清一区二区三区二| 欧美亚洲日本最大视频资源| 久久久久久久久久久免费av| 日韩大片免费观看网站| 水蜜桃什么品种好| a级片在线免费高清观看视频| 哪个播放器可以免费观看大片| 日本爱情动作片www.在线观看| 国产精品蜜桃在线观看| 日韩熟女老妇一区二区性免费视频| 又大又黄又爽视频免费| 久久国内精品自在自线图片| 大又大粗又爽又黄少妇毛片口| 国产免费一级a男人的天堂| 日韩av免费高清视频| av天堂久久9| 蜜桃国产av成人99| 夫妻性生交免费视频一级片| 久久精品夜色国产| 一级毛片黄色毛片免费观看视频| 久久99热这里只频精品6学生| 久久精品国产a三级三级三级| 人体艺术视频欧美日本| 国产男女内射视频| 天堂俺去俺来也www色官网| 久久鲁丝午夜福利片| 亚洲综合色惰| 狂野欧美激情性bbbbbb| 久久精品国产亚洲av涩爱| 亚洲色图 男人天堂 中文字幕 | 大码成人一级视频| 狂野欧美激情性bbbbbb| 黄色一级大片看看| 99久久中文字幕三级久久日本| 色婷婷久久久亚洲欧美| 亚洲av不卡在线观看| 色94色欧美一区二区| 免费不卡的大黄色大毛片视频在线观看| 国产老妇伦熟女老妇高清| 人人妻人人爽人人添夜夜欢视频| www.色视频.com| 美女国产高潮福利片在线看| 尾随美女入室| 亚洲av.av天堂| 美女国产高潮福利片在线看| 不卡视频在线观看欧美| 日日撸夜夜添| 黄色视频在线播放观看不卡| 91精品三级在线观看| 亚洲欧美成人综合另类久久久| 亚洲av免费高清在线观看| 成人午夜精彩视频在线观看| 制服诱惑二区| 国产在视频线精品| 久久久欧美国产精品| 少妇被粗大猛烈的视频| 午夜老司机福利剧场| 中文字幕久久专区| 日本av免费视频播放| 丝袜美足系列| 欧美日韩亚洲高清精品| 久久人妻熟女aⅴ| 九色成人免费人妻av| 啦啦啦啦在线视频资源| 欧美日韩一区二区视频在线观看视频在线| 日韩强制内射视频| 如何舔出高潮| 插逼视频在线观看| 日韩强制内射视频| 欧美成人午夜免费资源| 在线看a的网站| 国产综合精华液| videos熟女内射| 久久久久久久久久久久大奶| 日韩成人av中文字幕在线观看| 亚洲av在线观看美女高潮| 成人毛片60女人毛片免费| 99九九线精品视频在线观看视频| 国产精品久久久久久精品古装| 日韩,欧美,国产一区二区三区| 亚洲怡红院男人天堂| 亚洲av免费高清在线观看| 亚洲无线观看免费| 我的女老师完整版在线观看| 97精品久久久久久久久久精品| 国产一区二区三区综合在线观看 | av福利片在线| 女性被躁到高潮视频| 国产精品99久久久久久久久| 国产极品粉嫩免费观看在线 | 九九爱精品视频在线观看| 国产有黄有色有爽视频| 日韩成人av中文字幕在线观看| 久久精品国产a三级三级三级| 国产免费福利视频在线观看| 丰满迷人的少妇在线观看| 91精品伊人久久大香线蕉| 成年女人在线观看亚洲视频| 69精品国产乱码久久久| 精品人妻熟女av久视频| 日韩熟女老妇一区二区性免费视频| 国产国拍精品亚洲av在线观看| 婷婷成人精品国产| 欧美xxⅹ黑人| 久久青草综合色| 在线观看一区二区三区激情| 国产极品天堂在线| 午夜福利影视在线免费观看| 亚洲精品第二区| 亚洲av二区三区四区| 多毛熟女@视频| 内地一区二区视频在线| 夜夜看夜夜爽夜夜摸| 一本色道久久久久久精品综合| 51国产日韩欧美| 国产淫语在线视频| 亚洲av中文av极速乱| 观看美女的网站| 国产精品国产av在线观看| 一级片'在线观看视频| 亚洲国产av新网站| 精品人妻熟女av久视频| 男的添女的下面高潮视频| 婷婷色综合www| 久久精品人人爽人人爽视色| 在线观看免费高清a一片| 91精品三级在线观看| 9色porny在线观看| 人妻一区二区av| av天堂久久9| 午夜免费男女啪啪视频观看| 亚洲精品国产色婷婷电影| 久久这里有精品视频免费| 国产一区亚洲一区在线观看| 又黄又爽又刺激的免费视频.| 亚洲av男天堂| 久久久久久久亚洲中文字幕| 欧美精品国产亚洲| 久久精品熟女亚洲av麻豆精品| 欧美精品国产亚洲| 秋霞伦理黄片| 国国产精品蜜臀av免费| 18+在线观看网站| 国产视频首页在线观看| 国产不卡av网站在线观看| 国产精品三级大全| 蜜桃在线观看..| 伦理电影免费视频| 熟女av电影| 丰满迷人的少妇在线观看| 久久亚洲国产成人精品v| 亚洲欧洲精品一区二区精品久久久 | 精品国产露脸久久av麻豆| 午夜老司机福利剧场| 欧美日韩综合久久久久久| 王馨瑶露胸无遮挡在线观看| 熟女电影av网| 在线 av 中文字幕| 免费不卡的大黄色大毛片视频在线观看| 伊人久久国产一区二区| 成人国产av品久久久| 日日撸夜夜添| 天天影视国产精品| 日韩av免费高清视频| 一级爰片在线观看| 日韩中字成人| 亚洲欧美清纯卡通| 日日摸夜夜添夜夜添av毛片| 精品国产一区二区久久| 黄色视频在线播放观看不卡| 五月开心婷婷网| 18禁裸乳无遮挡动漫免费视频| 一级黄片播放器| 插逼视频在线观看| 国产精品一区二区在线不卡| 国产乱人偷精品视频| 国产精品偷伦视频观看了| 午夜老司机福利剧场| 免费看不卡的av| 国产男人的电影天堂91| 热re99久久精品国产66热6| 成人毛片60女人毛片免费| 少妇猛男粗大的猛烈进出视频| 日韩一区二区视频免费看| 国产精品秋霞免费鲁丝片| av女优亚洲男人天堂| 久久久久久久久久人人人人人人| 久久久久人妻精品一区果冻| 午夜福利,免费看| 免费观看性生交大片5| 成年人免费黄色播放视频| 久久韩国三级中文字幕| 精品国产露脸久久av麻豆| 一本一本综合久久| 婷婷色麻豆天堂久久| 热re99久久精品国产66热6| 日韩中字成人| 国产乱人偷精品视频| 爱豆传媒免费全集在线观看| 午夜视频国产福利| 国产精品女同一区二区软件| 国产精品一区二区三区四区免费观看| 一区二区三区乱码不卡18| 亚洲av日韩在线播放| 亚洲欧美一区二区三区国产| 亚洲色图 男人天堂 中文字幕 | 久久精品熟女亚洲av麻豆精品| 国产片内射在线| 欧美激情国产日韩精品一区| 国产成人免费无遮挡视频| 亚洲成人av在线免费| 亚洲四区av| 久久免费观看电影| 美女视频免费永久观看网站| 色婷婷av一区二区三区视频| 久久婷婷青草| 色视频在线一区二区三区| 日韩熟女老妇一区二区性免费视频| 久久久久国产精品人妻一区二区| 大香蕉久久成人网| 亚洲图色成人| 亚洲国产欧美在线一区| 熟女av电影| 啦啦啦视频在线资源免费观看| 欧美日韩综合久久久久久| 亚洲精品日本国产第一区| 亚洲一区二区三区欧美精品| 国产一级毛片在线| 少妇人妻久久综合中文| 美女中出高潮动态图| 久久久久人妻精品一区果冻| 黄色一级大片看看| 国内精品宾馆在线| 亚洲精品日韩在线中文字幕| 亚洲精品国产av蜜桃| 久久久久久伊人网av| 美女中出高潮动态图| 亚洲国产精品一区三区| 国产成人精品在线电影| 中文乱码字字幕精品一区二区三区| 亚洲精品日韩在线中文字幕| 18禁观看日本| 午夜激情久久久久久久| 熟女av电影| 国产免费视频播放在线视频| 欧美xxⅹ黑人| 国产亚洲一区二区精品| 视频区图区小说| 日本91视频免费播放| 国国产精品蜜臀av免费| 九草在线视频观看| 老司机亚洲免费影院| 亚洲精品久久久久久婷婷小说| 国产一级毛片在线| 国产精品国产三级国产av玫瑰| 日韩精品免费视频一区二区三区 | 日韩免费高清中文字幕av| 欧美精品人与动牲交sv欧美| 妹子高潮喷水视频| 色吧在线观看| 赤兔流量卡办理| 最近中文字幕高清免费大全6| 免费av不卡在线播放| 精品久久久精品久久久| 国产精品 国内视频| 久热久热在线精品观看| 十分钟在线观看高清视频www| 成年女人在线观看亚洲视频| 免费观看性生交大片5| 全区人妻精品视频| 人妻系列 视频| 精品国产一区二区久久| 人妻 亚洲 视频| xxxhd国产人妻xxx| 国产成人精品久久久久久| 99热这里只有是精品在线观看| 亚洲美女视频黄频| 亚洲av成人精品一区久久| a级毛片免费高清观看在线播放| 国产探花极品一区二区| 日韩免费高清中文字幕av| 亚洲av国产av综合av卡| 国产深夜福利视频在线观看| 国产精品三级大全| 少妇高潮的动态图| 丝袜脚勾引网站| 69精品国产乱码久久久| 夜夜爽夜夜爽视频| 亚洲精品国产色婷婷电影| 黄色配什么色好看| 五月天丁香电影| 国产 一区精品| 老女人水多毛片| 免费久久久久久久精品成人欧美视频 | 成年女人在线观看亚洲视频| av在线播放精品| 亚洲欧美一区二区三区黑人 | 九色亚洲精品在线播放| 成人国产麻豆网| 欧美97在线视频| 日本爱情动作片www.在线观看| 亚洲第一区二区三区不卡| 日本黄色片子视频| 桃花免费在线播放| 久久亚洲国产成人精品v| 午夜91福利影院| 日韩av不卡免费在线播放| 久久久久久人妻| 九色成人免费人妻av| 国产欧美亚洲国产| 曰老女人黄片| 精品久久久久久久久亚洲| 日韩视频在线欧美| 日日爽夜夜爽网站| 精品人妻偷拍中文字幕| 国产深夜福利视频在线观看| 亚洲欧洲精品一区二区精品久久久 | 少妇人妻久久综合中文| 日韩在线高清观看一区二区三区| 国模一区二区三区四区视频| 亚洲精品视频女| 久久精品国产鲁丝片午夜精品| av一本久久久久| .国产精品久久| 伦理电影大哥的女人| 国产老妇伦熟女老妇高清| 3wmmmm亚洲av在线观看| 精品一区二区三卡| 久久 成人 亚洲| 交换朋友夫妻互换小说| 免费黄网站久久成人精品| 国产精品三级大全| 免费av不卡在线播放| 99热6这里只有精品| 久久久久久久久大av| 久久av网站| 最近手机中文字幕大全| 亚洲熟女精品中文字幕| 亚洲三级黄色毛片| 久久国产亚洲av麻豆专区| 日韩av不卡免费在线播放| 亚洲国产精品国产精品| 久久久久人妻精品一区果冻| 全区人妻精品视频| 亚洲国产欧美日韩在线播放| 精品久久国产蜜桃| 国产男女超爽视频在线观看| 天堂俺去俺来也www色官网| 亚洲精品色激情综合| 不卡视频在线观看欧美| 国产 精品1| 亚洲伊人久久精品综合| 人人妻人人爽人人添夜夜欢视频| 免费日韩欧美在线观看| 免费播放大片免费观看视频在线观看| 久久久欧美国产精品| 亚洲精品国产av成人精品| 国产精品一国产av| 美女中出高潮动态图| 国产精品久久久久久av不卡| 免费高清在线观看视频在线观看| 高清不卡的av网站| 午夜日本视频在线| 少妇精品久久久久久久| 国产av国产精品国产| 亚洲激情五月婷婷啪啪| 免费黄频网站在线观看国产| av国产精品久久久久影院| 美女大奶头黄色视频| 亚洲少妇的诱惑av| 久久人人爽av亚洲精品天堂| 午夜福利网站1000一区二区三区| 狠狠精品人妻久久久久久综合| 国产亚洲最大av| 天堂中文最新版在线下载| 纯流量卡能插随身wifi吗| 黑人猛操日本美女一级片| 在线天堂最新版资源| 欧美 日韩 精品 国产| 日本猛色少妇xxxxx猛交久久| 久久国产精品大桥未久av| 久久人人爽人人片av| 成人国产av品久久久| 五月天丁香电影| 国产免费一级a男人的天堂| 国产日韩欧美视频二区| 国产精品国产三级专区第一集| 九色亚洲精品在线播放| 亚洲av中文av极速乱| 亚洲人成网站在线播| 久久久久视频综合| 亚洲精品一二三| 黄色毛片三级朝国网站| 寂寞人妻少妇视频99o| 少妇熟女欧美另类| 日韩中字成人| 日韩视频在线欧美| 久久久久久久精品精品| 成人亚洲欧美一区二区av| 简卡轻食公司| 观看av在线不卡|