• <tr id="yyy80"></tr>
  • <sup id="yyy80"></sup>
  • <tfoot id="yyy80"><noscript id="yyy80"></noscript></tfoot>
  • 99热精品在线国产_美女午夜性视频免费_国产精品国产高清国产av_av欧美777_自拍偷自拍亚洲精品老妇_亚洲熟女精品中文字幕_www日本黄色视频网_国产精品野战在线观看 ?

    A New Interface Identification Technique Based on Absolute Density Gradient for Violent Flows

    2018-07-11 08:00:58YanZhouandQingweiMa

    Yan Zhou and Qingwei Ma*

    1 Introduction

    In numerical simulations of two-phase flows, the identification of interface is essential in solving equations describing the transport of momentum, mass and energy. There are various methods for interface identification which can be broadly divided into two groups.One is for mesh-based methods, usually based on an indicator function resulting in an interface with the thickness either covering several grid cells or one cell. The other group is for meshless-based methods, in which particles are moved in Lagrangian formulation,yielding an interface directly which is coincided with the position of a set of particles.

    In mesh-based methods, the volume of fluid (VOF) method captures the interface by the indicator function formulated with a volume fraction of either phase. To represent a sharp interface within the mesh, the VOF is often complemented by reconstruction techniques such as piece wise constant approach [Hirt and Nichols (1981); Yokoi (2007)], piecewise linear approach [Aulisa, Manservisi, Scardovelli et al. (2007); Rudman (1997)],piecewise quadratic [Diwakar, Das and Sundararajan (2009); Renardy and Renardy(2002)] or piecewise cubic approximations [Ginzburg and Wittum (2001); López,Hernández, Gómez et al. (2004)]. To simplify the computational treatment, Rudman et al.[Rudman (1997), Ubbink and Issa (1999) and Xiao, Honma, Kono et al. (2005)]employed another way to identify the interface by using a range of the value of a volume fraction, which actually represent an interface covering several grid cells. And later Welle et al. [Weller (2008); Hoang, van Steijn, Portela et al. (2013)] introduced the artificial compression terms to sharpen the interface and counteract the numerical diffusion.Different from artificial geometric representation in the VOF when reconstructing the interface, the indicator in level-set method [Osher and Sethian (1988); Yang, Ouyang,Jiang et al. (2010); Balabel (2012, 2013)] is a smoothed signed distance function from the interface and zero level-set value gives the location of the interface. To remedy its mass non-conservation problem, re-initialization for the signed distance function [Sussman and Fatemi (1999); Min (2010)] and mass corrections [Ausas, Dari, Buscaglia et al. (2011);Zhang, Zou, Greaves et al. (2010)] were widely adopted. Phase field method based on free energy theory is also used for interface tracking [Takada, Misawa and Tomiyama(2006); Aland, Lowengrub and Voigt (2010)]. Instead of using Eulerian mesh, the arbitrary Lagrangian-Eulerian mesh system was also adopted in which the unstructured meshes are moved to keep the grid nodes at the interface [Muzaferija and Peri'c (1997);Tukovic and Jasak (2012)].

    As for meshless-based methods, the interface can be inherently tracked by moving particles which are initially allocated and remain as one phase during the simulation. For methods that solve two phases in one set of equations, such as in Hu et al. [Hu and Adams (2007); Chen, Zong, Liu et al. (2015)] and Qiang, Chen, Gao et al. (2011) based on a smoothed particle hydrodynamics (SPH) method and in Shakibaeinia et al.[Shakibaeinia and Jin (2012)] and Khayyer et al. [Khayyer and Gotoh (2013)] employing the Moving Particle Semi-implicit (MPS) method, interface conditions are implicitly implemented and thus the interface does not need to be explicitly identified. However, for explicit boundary condition implementation, two situations can be observed. One situation is that the flow is not violent or large deformations do not occur, under which particles on the free surface in single phase flows or on the interface of multiphase flows are maintained during the simulation [Ma (2005)], in which the interface is known and its identification is not necessary. The other situation comes with flows being violent or with large deformations and therefore the inner and boundary particles are changeable [Lee,Moulinec, Xu et al. (2008); Ma and Zhou (2009); Shao (2012); Zhou (2016)], and one phase can penetrates into other phase, forming isolated particles. In this situation, the interface particles and isolated particles (penetrating to the other phase) must be identified in every time step.

    In this paper a new interface (and also isolated) particle identification technique is proposed for the meshless-based methods, which is based on absolute density gradient for violent flows. In the next section the existing methods for interface particle identification used in the meshless-based methods will be briefly reviewed. Then the formulation of the new identification technique and parameters tests is given, followed by the comparisons between the new technique and the existing ones. Finally, validations of the new technique on different density ratios, different degree of randomness of particle distribution, various sizes of the support domain in calculating the density gradient and different flow conditions will be carried out.

    2 Brief review on interface particle identification techniques for meshless methods

    Many applications of meshless methods (e.g. incompressible SPH (ISPH), MPS and MLPG) in single phase wave simulation depend strongly on free surface particle identification based on which the dynamic surface boundary condition can be implemented. A number of approaches have been proposed and adopted in various meshless methods, such as these using the particle number density method (abbreviated to PND) in MPS [Koshizuka, Nobe, Oka (1998); Gotoh and Sakai (2006); Kakuda,Hayashi, Obara et al. (2013) et al. (2013); Xu and Jin (2014)] and fluid density in ISPH[Shao (2009)]. Both techniques are developed mainly for single phase problems, which lead to lower particle number density (MPS) or lower density (SPH) on the free surface,satisfying Eq. (1) and Eq. (2), respectively,

    whereis the particle number density for the target particle i withwbeing a weight function and n0denotes the inner particle number density which is initially defined. Similar to particle number density,is used to give the estimated density and ρ0denotes the specified density of fluid. θ and κ are coefficients to evaluate the decreasing of niand ρifor the interface particles. As pointed by Koshizuka [Koshizuka and Oka (1996)] the value of θ could be in the range of 0.8 to 0.99 and was selected as 0.97 in their case study of dam breaking and in modelling weir flows [Xu and Jin (2014)]. niand κ were chosen as 0.95 for simulating breaking waves on slopes [Koshizuka, Nobe and Oka (1998)] and 0.99 for simulating water entry of a free-fall object [Shao (2009)]. However, this simple approach has been found often to incorrectly identify the interface (or free surface) particles, especially when the particles are unevenly distributed.

    As a supplementary to PND, a mixed particle number density and auxiliary function method (MPAM) was proposed [Ma and Zhou (2009)] by additionally counting the existing interface particles and the occupied quarters and rectangles in the support domain in Ma et al. [Ma and Zhou (2009)]. Following Shao et al. [Shao (2009); Ma and Zhou (2009)], the method was further developed by Zheng et al. [Zheng, Ma and Duan(2014)] by defining two quarter-dividing systems and counting the occupied ones in which the value of κ was chosen as 0.9. As confirmed by many calculations in the cited papers, the accuracy of identifying interface particles is significantly improved with the auxiliary functions. However apart from the complexity in sorting neighbouring particles into quarters and other specific regions, the dependence on the identification of the previous time step could lead to error accumulation once misidentification occurs in previous steps.

    Lee et al. [Lee, Moulinec, Xu et al. (2008); Rafiee, Cummins and Rudman (2012)]employed a tracking method by estimating the divergence of position vector,→, with the expression of

    where ?Vjis the volume of the particle associated with particle j. The value of the numerical divergence from Eq. (3) is close to 2 for inner particles in two dimensional simulations and decreases on the free surface particles for the reason that the number of neighbouring particles is smaller and the support of the kernel is truncated. Thus the criterion identifying the free surface particles in the cited paper is set as

    It was indicated that not all the surface particles were correctly identified [Lee, Moulinec,Xu et al. (2008)] and some inner particles are over identified [Lind, Xu, Stansby et al.(2012)] although the misjudgements appeared to be insignificant in the cases they have considered by using the method. Because the theoretical value of the position vector divergence should be 2 for both inner and surface particles, its numerical value should be close to 2 even near or on the interface if more accurate and consistent approximation,such as SFDI gradient scheme [Ma (2008)] is employed to estimate the divergence. From this point of view, the method is questionable for its general use and so will not be considered further in this paper.

    Above interface particle identification techniques developed for single phase can be applied in a straightforward way to interface identification in two-phase flows by involving the particles of the other phase if the difference of the two phase densities are large [Shao (2012)] or by neglecting the one phase and picking out the ‘surface’ of the rest phase. To improve the accuracy and reduce the complexity of the interface identification technique, a new approach based on the absolute density gradient is proposed in this paper. This method is based on the fact that the density gradient is infinite on the interface but zero away from it. In two-phase violent flows, it often happens that one phase penetrates into the other. In that case, the penetrated parts are usually represented by isolated particles for which special treatment are necessary [Gotoh and Sakai (2006)]. Gotoh et al. [Gotoh and Sakai (2006)] also provided an identification method using a combination of particle number density and the number of neighbouring particles of the other phase. In comparison the newly proposed technique is able to identify such isolated particles in a more consistent way.

    3 Absolute density gradient technique

    For immiscible two-phase flows with the sharp density jump at the interface, the density gradients are 0 for inner particles and become theoretically infinite at the interface if both phases are incompressible. For weak compressible phases, the density gradients are close to 0 for inner particles and are also theoretically infinite at the interface. To utilize this fact for interface identification, the absolute value of density gradient is numerically computed as below

    whereandare the position vectors of neighbour and target particles, rj,xand rj,yare the component ofin the x- and y- direction, Reis the radius of the support domain proportional to ?l with ?l being the initial average particle distance and ?rijis defined as

    The numerical value of β is very close 0 for inner particles and it rapidly increases when approaching to the interface or isolated particles. Although the gradient is theoretically infinite at the interface or isolated particles, it is just a large value in numerical computation.

    To obtain a non-dimensional scale of the absolute density gradient β0is introduced with the expression of

    where ρ1and ρ2are densities of two phases. The interface and isolated particles will be identified by the ratio of β/ β0rather than the value of β. To shed some light on the order of the ratio, we may consider the special cases: uniformly distributed particles with some of them being on horizontal (or vertical) interface, diagonal interface or isolated. If only the nearest four neighbours are considered (i.e. the support domain is in the range ofthe value of β/ β0should be 0.5 for horizontal or vertical interfaces, 1.0 for diagonal interfaces and 2.0 for isolated particles by using Eqs. (5) and (6). It is noted here that for any distribution of particles with the weight function given by Eq. (7) and a fixed support domain size, the value of β/ β0remains independent on the value of ?l. It is also noted that the value of β/ β0will not be affected by the density ratio of the two phases. In other words, the value of β/ β0is independent on the total number of particles for a given domain and density ratio. Nevertheless, in general situations with the particular weight function used and the chosen radius of the support domain, the value of

    β/ β0will vary in a range with the change of particle distribution. Therefore the most suitable values need to be determined by considering a range of flowing conditions of the two phases. The following two conditions (I) and (II) are then checked.

    If Condition (I) is satisfied, the particles are identified to be interface particles. If Condition (II) is met, the particles are identified as isolated particles. If none of the conditions is satisfied, they are classified as inner particles. For general cases, particles move and become irregularly distributed. The values of γ and α will be discussed below using numerical tests. This approach based on Eqs. (5)-(9) is shortened as ADG (absolute density gradient) method hereafter for convenience.

    To determine the value of γand α, a number of tests are carried out for a specified particle configurations shown in Fig. 1. In this figure, two typical regions are enlarged. Particles are clustered in region 1 and relatively coarser in region 2. As shown in Fig. 1(a), an underspecified value of γ (e.g. 0.1), leads to misidentifying inner particles close to the interface in the clustered region (some inner particles are identified as interface particles, i.e. overidentified). However, an over-specified value of γ (e.g. 0.5), shown in Fig. 1(b), leads to missing the particles on the interface in the region where the distribution of particles is relatively coarser (i.e. under-identified). Based on this, we can deduce that there might be a range of values for γ which may lead to correctly identifying the interface particles. We have also tested the value of γ in the range of 0.2 to 0.4 for the same configuration and found that the interface particles are correctly picked out and insensitive to the specific value in the range. The results of γ =0.2 and γ =0.4 are illustrated in Fig. 2. Hereafter,the value of γ is selected to be 0.3, unless mentioned otherwise. It is noted here that the new scheme discussed above will not misidentify the inner particles away from interface as the value of β/ β0is always zero or very close to zero for incompressible and weak compressible fluids. When the value of γ is smaller, it tends to be that more particles near the interface may be misidentified as interface particle (e.g. Fig. 1(a)). However, this kind of misidentification will not significantly affect the computation results as the values of physical variables near the interface are very close to those on the interface. More discussions about this point may be found in Ma et al. [Ma and Zhou (2009); Zhou (2016)].

    Figure 1: Examples of interface identifications when applying improper values of γ. (a)shows inner particles close to the interface are over-identified with γ=0.1 and (b)shows some interface particles are under-identified with γ=0.5. (density ratio: 1:1000)

    Figure 2: Examples of interface identifications when applying proper values of γ. (a)shows the interface identified by γ =0.2 and (b) is obtained by γ =0.4. (density ratio:1:1000)

    Another particle configuration associated with the violent sloshing of two phases is used to illustrate the effects of value for α in Condition (II). Figs. 3(a) and 3(b) show that the isolated particles penetrating into the other phase are identified by using the value of α to be 1.4 and 1.6, respectively. It can be seen that the isolated particles of both phases are correctly identified by using either value. This demonstrates that the results are not sensitive to the value of α when it is within the range of 1.4 to 1.6. Thus α=1.5 will be used for isolated particle identification.

    Figure 3: Isolated particles marked by squares for heavier fluid particles and diamonds for lighter fluid particles (density ratio: 1:1000) are identified with α being 1.4 (a) and 1.6

    (b). The heavier phase is marked in black and the lighter is in light grey. In the enlarged figures on the right, support domains for each isolated particles are marked with a circle.According to above numerical tests, the values of γ and α are selected to be 0.3 and 1.5 for the conditions of (I) and (II) to identify the interface particles and isolated particles,respectively

    4 Validations

    4.1 Identification with different random distributions of particles

    The newly proposed interface identification technique will be further validated on random distributed particles. Comparison will be made with the results of other two methods. One is the PND method used by MPS simulation and the other is the MPAM suggested by Ma et al. [Ma and Zhou (2009)] as mentioned in Section 2. The tests are first carried out on the specified configuration shown in Fig. 4 in which the unit patch is divided into two portions by a sinusoidal curve of y=0.1sin(2πx)+0.5. Particles are randomly distributed by using the ‘haltonset’ function available in MATLAB. Below the sinusoidal curve the particles represent the fluid phase 1 (blue dots) and the rest is filled by fluid phase 2 (red dots).

    Figure 4: Sketch of interface testing case. 2000 random distributed particles in a unit patch divided into two portions by y=0.1sin(2πx)+0.5 shown by dashed line. Blue and red dots represent the fluid phase 1 and fluid phase 2, respectively

    Figure 5: Interface particles (black nodes) identification by PND with θ=0.85 (a),PND with θ=0.97(b), PND with auxiliary functions (c) and ADG (d). Blue and red dots represent the fluid phase 1 and fluid phase 2 respectively. (Density ratio=0.9)

    Figure 6: Interface particles (black nodes) identification by PND with θ =0.8 (a), θ =0.7(b) and θ=0.6 (c). Blue and red dots represent the fluid phase 1 and fluid phase 2,respectively

    When using the PND and MPAM methods, interface particles are identified as surface particles of the phase 1 by ignoring the present of the phase 2 as they are developed for single phase problem. As shown in Fig. 5 black dots are the interface particles identified by the PND method with θ =0.85 and θ =0.97 in Figs. 5(a) and 5(b), which are in the range of θ proposed by Koshizuka et al. [Koshizuka and Oka (1996)]. One can observe that the interface particles are highly over-identified with many inner particles are marked as interface ones although it is moderately relieved by decreasing the coefficient. Such over-identification was also observed by Zheng et al. [Zheng, Ma and Duan (2014)] in their dam breaking simulation. There are also several particles located on the interface but not identified by using either value of θ. Other θ values are also tested and the results are shown in Fig. 6. One can find that decreasing the value helps alleviate overidentification of inner particles but more interface particles are also missed. The reasons for such inaccuracy are that the accuracy of the PND method strongly depends on the randomness of the particle distribution which was pointed out by Ma et al. [Ma and Zhou(2009)]. For inner particles, coarse distribution leads to low particle number density even with a complete support domain and so over-identification happens. On the contrast,particles clustering on the interface leads to high particle number density even though the support domain of its own phase is incomplete, leading to their misidentification to inner particles. For the results obtained using the MPAM shown in Fig. 5(c), the accuracy is significantly improved. But over-identification still happens on inner particles close to the interface. Since this identification technique is based on the interface particles identified at the previous time step, error accumulation may occur after long time simulation. Fig.5(d) shows the results obtained by the method proposed in this paper. It can be seen that almost all the interface particles are correctly identified. No inner particles are wrongly identified by the method. As indicated above, the new technique does not depend on the density ratio. To confirm this, the tests are also carried out on different density ratios of 0.1 and 0.01 in addition to the ratio of 0.9 in Fig. 5(d) by using the ADG method, and the results for the density ratios of 0.1 and 0.01are shown in Fig. 7. This figure and Fig. 5(d)show that the accurate identification is achieved in all the cases, demonstrating that results of the ADG method are independent of the density ratios.

    Figure 7: Interface particles (black nodes) identification by ADG technique on density ratios of 0.1 with the densities of blue and red dots of 10 and 1 respectively in (a) and 0.01 with the densities of blue and red dots of 100 and 1 respectively in (b)

    In modelling violent multiphase flow, the particle distribution can become very random even they are uniformly distributed initially. It is important to examine the behaviours of interface identification methods at different levels of randomness of particle distributions.For this purpose, we use a configuration similar to that in Fig. 4 with a particle number of 2500; however the particles are distributed in a way that they are first uniformly located and then deviated byi.e. the position of particle is given bywhere each of Rnxand Rnyis a group of random numbers ranging from 0 to 1.0 generated separately in x- and y- direction, respectively;k is the randomness coefficient and ?lis the particle distance in uniform distribution;andare the unit vector in x- and y- direction, respectively; k=0 leads to zero deviation and uniform distribution. As k increases, the distribution becomes more disorderly. If the value of k is equal to or large than 1, there would be possibility that the position of a particle can be shifted by more than ?l. The three methods (PND, MPAM and ADG) are employed to identify the interface particles for the cases with different level of randomness. The numbers of particles inaccurately identified for three techniques are listed in Tab. 1 with k increasing from 0 to 1.2. The reference number is the number of particles on the interface, which are at or near the specified interface curve within the distance of 0.5?l. One can see that the number of misidentified particles by the PND method is small only when the value of k is very small but with the increase of the k value (level of randomness), the number of misidentified particles are large, even much larger than the number of interface particles. In contrast, the number of misidentified particles for each value of k by the MPAM is significantly reduced but is still considerable. Comparatively, the number of misidentification by the ADG method is very small and not increases with the increase of randomness. To have a clearer look at their performances, the ratio of inaccurate identification defined as the number of misidentified particles divided by the reference number is demonstrated in Fig. 8. It shows that, by increasing the randomness, more than 7 times of the interface particles are misidentified by the PND when k reaches 1.2 while this ratio decreases to 0.97 with more moderate incensement by the MPAM. The maximum ratio is less than 0.09 arising at k=0.8 and shows less dependency on the value of k by the ADG. With the same configuration, the total particle numbers of 900, 1600, 2500, 3600, 4900 and 6400 are also tested using the ADG method with the values of k=0.6,0.8,1.0 and 1.2. The results are given in Fig. 9,showing that the performance of the ADG technique is insensitive to the total particle number. This observation is consistent with what is mentioned previously that the technique does not depend on the average distance between particles. The slight change in the results showing in Fig. 9 is due to random distribution of particles.

    Table 2: The number of misidentified particles for different particle distribution randomness by using PND, MPAM and ADG methods

    Figure 8: The ratios of inaccurate identification (number of misidentified particles/the reference number) of increasing randomness by using three identification techniques

    Figure 9: The ratios of inaccurate identification (number of misidentified particles/the reference number) of increasing total particle number using the method of ADG with randomness coefficients of 0.6 to 1.2

    Tests are also carried out for various support domain sizes Reof the weight function within the range of 1.4?l to 4.0?l which is widely adopted for function interpolation,gradient and Laplacian approximations [Ataie-Ashtiani and Farhadi (2006); Gotoh and Freds?e (2000); Xu and Jin (2014); Zheng, Ma and Duan (2014)]. Following the above setup for k=0.6 and 1.0, the numbers of misidentified particles by the ADG are listed in Tab. 2. It shows that small support domain (e.g. Re/?l=1.4 and 1.6) leads to moderate increment of misidentification due to insufficient neighbouring particles to accurately estimate the density gradient. By increasing Re/?l (>2.1), the results become insensitive to the variation of the size and even better. Considering the computational time, Re/?l=2.1 as selected in above tests is reasonable, but one can choose to use a larger support domain for identifying the interface particles.

    Table 3: Numbers of misidentified particles by the ADG method with different support domain size Re for two values of k=0.6 and 1.0

    Figure 10: Black dots and filled diamonds are interface and isolated particles identified by the ADG technique in four dam breaking snapshots. The heavier fluid with the density of 1.0 of phase 1 is represented by blue dots and the lighter fluid with density of 0.001 of phase 2 is represented by red dots

    4.2 Identifications for the dam breaking flow

    To further validate the newly proposed identification technique on different flow conditions, four snapshots are picked from a dam breaking simulation [Zheng, Ma and Duan (2014)], in which the heavier fluid (phase 1-water) indicated by blue dots is released in the lighter fluid (phase 2-air) indicated by red dots. The four configurations shown in Fig. 10 include the changing and irregular shape of the released water with a smooth interface in (a), a backward jet in (b), the jet merging into the bottom water in (c)and a second jet in (d). A trapped air bubble also appears in (c) and (d). The density ratio of the two phases in this test is 1:1000. As we can observe from Fig. 10, the interface and isolated particles (black dots) are accurately identified for all the configurations,indicating that the ADG method works well for the more complex cases.

    5 Conclusion

    This paper has presented a new interface particle identification method for violent twophase flows based on the absolute density gradient (ADG). The behaviour of the method is tested for different configurations including these with different level of randomness. It is shown that the accuracy of the method is independent of the density ratio of two phases and of the average distance between particles. In all the cases tested, the method can correctly pick up almost all the interface and isolated particles as long as the support domain is larger than twice average distance of particles.

    Acknowledgement:The authors gratefully acknowledge the PhD scholarship provided to Y Zhou by City University and China Scholarship Council and the financial support of the EPSRC through a research grant (EP/J012858/1).

    Aland, S.; Lowengrub, J.; Voigt, A.(2010): Two-phase flow in complex geometries: A diffuse domain approach.Computer Modeling in Engineering & Sciences, vol. 57, no. 1,pp. 77-106.

    Ataie-Ashtiani, B.; Farhadi, L.(2006): A stable moving-particle semi-implicit method for free surface flows.Fluid Dynamics Research, vol. 38, no. 4, pp. 241-256.

    Aulisa, E.; Manservisi, S.; Scardovelli, R.; Zaleski, S.(2007): Interface reconstruction with least-squares fit and split advection in three-dimensional Cartesian geometry.Journal of Computational Physics, vol. 225, no. 2, pp. 2301-2319.

    Ausas, R. F.; Dari, E. A.; Buscaglia, G. C.(2011): Arterial fluid mechanics modeling with the stabilized space-time fluid-structure interaction technique.A Geometric Mass-Preserving Redistancing Scheme for the Level Set Function, vol. 65, pp. 989-1010.

    Balabel, A.(2013): Numerical modelling of liquid jet breakup by different liquid jet/air flow orientations using the level set method.Computer Modeling in Engineering &Sciences, vol. 95, no. 4, pp. 283-302.

    Balabel, A.(2012): Numerical modelling of turbulence effects on droplet collision dynamics using the level set method.Computer Modeling in Engineering & Sciences, vol.89, no. 4, pp. 283-301.

    Chen, Z.; Zong, Z.; Liu, M.; Zou, L.; Li, H. et al.(2015): An SPH model for multiphase flows with complex interfaces and large density differences.Journal of Computational Physics, vol. 283, pp. 169-188.

    Diwakar, S. V.; Das, S. K.; Sundararajan, T.(2009): A quadratic spline based interface (QUASI) reconstruction algorithm for accurate tracking of two-phase flows.Journal of Computational Physics, vol. 228, no. 24, pp. 9107-9130.

    Ginzburg, I.; Wittum, G.(2001): Two-phase flows on interface refined grids modeled with VOF, staggered finite volumes, and spline interpolants.Journal of Computational Physics, vol. 166, no. 2, pp. 302-335.

    Gotoh, H.; Freds? e, J.(2000): Lagrangian two-phase flow model of the settling behavior of fine sediment dumped into water.27th International Conference on Coastal Engineering, pp. 3906-3919.

    Gotoh, H.; Sakai, T.(2006): Key issues in the particle method for computation of wave breaking.Coastal Engineering, vol. 53, 2-3, pp. 171-179.

    Qiang, H.; Chen, F.; Gao, W.(2011): Modified algorithm for surface tension with smoothed particle hydrodynamics and its applications.Computer Modeling in Engineering & Sciences, vol. 77, no. 4, pp. 239-262.

    Hirt, C. W.; Nichols, B. D.(1981): Volume of fluid (VOF) method for the dynamics of free boundaries.Journal of Computational Physics, vol. 39, no. 1, pp. 201-225.

    Hoang, D. A.; van Steijn, V.; Portela, L. M.; Kreutzer, M. T.; Kleijn, C. R.(2013):Benchmark numerical simulations of segmented two-phase flows in microchannels using the volume of fluid method.Computers and Fluids, vol. 86, pp. 28-36.

    Hu, X. Y.; Adams, N. A.(2007): An incompressible multi-phase SPH method.Journal of Computational Physics, vol. 227, no. 1, pp. 264-278.

    Khayyer, A.; Gotoh, H.(2013): Enhancement of performance and stability of MPS mesh-free particle method for multiphase flows characterized by high density ratios.Journal of Computational Physics, vol. 242, pp. 211-233.

    Koshizuka, S.; Nobe, A.; Oka, Y.(1998): Numerical analysis of breaking waves using the moving particle semi-implicit method.International Journal for Numerical Methods in Fluids, vol. 26, no. 7, pp. 751-769.

    Kakuda, K.; Nagashima, T.; Hayashi, Y.; Obara, S.; Toyotani, J. et al.(2013):Three-dimensional fluid flow simulations using GPU-based particle method.Computer Modeling in Engineering & Sciences, vol. 93, no. 5, pp. 363-376.

    Koshizuka, S.; Oka, Y.(1996): Moving-particle semi-implicit method for fragmentation of incompressible fluid.Nuclear science and engineering, vol. 123, no. 3, pp. 421-434.

    Lee, E. S.; Moulinec, C.; Xu, R.; Violeau, D.; Laurence, D. et al.(2008): Comparisons of weakly compressible and truly incompressible algorithms for the SPH mesh free particle method.Journal of Computational Physics, vol. 227, no. 18, pp. 8417-8436.

    Lind, S. J.; Xu, R.; Stansby, P. K.; Rogers, B. D. (2012): Incompressible smoothed particle hydrodynamics for free: Surface flows: A generalised diffusion-based algorithm for stability and validations for impulsive flows and propagating waves.Journal of Computational Physics, vol. 231, no. 4, pp. 1499-1523.

    Ló pez, J.; Herná ndez, J.; Gó mez, P.; Faura, F. (2004): A volume of fluid method based on multidimensional advection and spline interface reconstruction.Journal of Computational Physics, vol. 195, no. 2, pp. 718-742.

    Ma, Q.(2008): A new meshless interpolation scheme for MLPG_R method.Computer Modeling in Engineering&Sciences, vol. 23, no. 2, pp. 75-89.

    Ma, Q.(2005): MLPG method based on rankine source solution for simulating nonlinear water waves.Computer Modeling in Engineering and Sciences, vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 193-209.

    Ma, Q.; Zhou, J.(2009): MLPG_R method for numerical simulation of 2D breakingwaves.Computer Modeling in Engineering&Sciences, vol. 43, no. 3, pp. 277-303.

    Min, C.(2010): On reinitializing level set functions.Journal of Computational Physics,vol. 229, no. 8, pp. 2764-2772.

    Muzaferija, S.; Peri'c, M.(1997): Computation of free-surface flows using the finitevolume method and moving grids.Numerical Heat Transfer, Part B: Fundamentals, vol.32, no. 4, pp. 369-384.

    Osher, S.; Sethian, J. A.(1988): Fronts propagating with curvature dependent speed:Algorithms based on Hamilton-Jacobi formulations.Journal of Computational Physics,vol. 79, pp. 12-49.

    Rafiee, A.; Cummins, S.; Rudman, M.; Thiagarajan, K.(2012): Comparative study on the accuracy and stability of SPH schemes in simulating energetic free-surface flows.European Journal of Mechanics, B/Fluids, vol. 36, pp. 1-16.

    Renardy, Y.; Renardy, M.(2002): PROST: A Parabolic Reconstruction of Surface Tension for the Volume-of-Fluid Method.Journal of Computational Physics, vol. 183,no. 2, pp. 400-421.

    Rudman, M.(1997): Volume-tracking methods for interfacial flow calculations.International Journal for Numerical Methods in Fluids, vol. 24, no. 7, pp. 671-691.

    Shakibaeinia, A.; Jin, Y.(2012): Lagrangian multiphase modeling of sand discharge into still water.Advances in Water Resources, vol. 48, pp. 55-67.

    Shao, S.(2012): Incompressible smoothed particle hydrodynamics simulation of multifluid flows.International Journal for Numerical Methods in Fluids, vol. 69, pp.1715-1735.

    Shao, S. D.(2009): Incompressible SPH simulation of water entry of a free-falling object.International Journal for Numerical Methods in Fluids, vol. 59, pp. 59-115.

    Sussman, M.; Fatemi, E.(1999): An efficient, interface-preserving level set redistancing algorithm and its application to interfacial incompressible fluid flow.SIAM Journal on Scientific Computing, vol. 20, no. 4, pp. 1165-1191.

    Takada, N.; Misawa, M.; Tomiyama, A.(2006): A phase-field method for interfacetracking simulation of two-phase flows.Mathematics and Computers in Simulation, vol.72, no. 2-6, pp. 220-226.

    Tukovic, Z.; Jasak, H.(2012): A moving mesh finite volume interface tracking method for surface tension dominated interfacial fluid flow.Computers and Fluids, vol. 55, pp. 70-84.

    Ubbink, O.; Issa, R. I.(1999): A method for capturing sharp fluid interfaces on arbitrary meshes.Journal of Computational Physics, vol. 153, no. 1, pp. 26-50.

    Weller, H. G.(2008): A new approach to VOF-based interface capturing methods for incompressible and compressible flow.Technical Report TR/HGW/07,OpenCFD Ltd.

    Xiao, F.; Honma, Y.; Kono, T.(2005): A simple algebraic interface capturing scheme using hyperbolic tangent function.International Journal for Numerical Methods in Fluids, vol. 48, no. 9, pp. 1023-1040.

    Xu, T.; Jin, Y.(2014): Numerical investigation of flow in pool-and-weir fishways using a meshless particle method.Journal of Hydraulic Research, vol. vol. 52, no. 6, pp. 849-861.

    Yang, B.; Ouyang, J.; Jiang, T.; Liu, C.(2010): Modeling and simulation of fiber reinforced polymer mold filling process by level set method.Computer Modeling in Engineering & Sciences, vol. 63, no. 3, pp. 191-222.

    Yokoi, K.(2007): Efficient implementation of THINC scheme: A simple and practical smoothed VOF algorithm.Journal of Computational Physics, vol. 226, no. 2, pp. 1985-2002.

    Zhou, Y.(2016):MLPG_R method for modelling two-dimensional two-phase flows(Ph.D Thesis).City University London, UK.

    Zhang, Y.; Zou, Q.; Greaves, D.(2010): Numerical simulation of free-surface flowusing the level-set method with global mass correction Yali.International Journal for Numerical Methods in Fluids, vol. 63, pp. 651-680.

    Zheng, X.; Ma, Q.; Duan, W.(2014): Incompressible SPH method based on Rankine source solution for violent water wave simulation.Journal of Computational Physics, vol.276, pp. 291-314.

    免费看a级黄色片| 天堂√8在线中文| 最近视频中文字幕2019在线8| 久久性视频一级片| 校园春色视频在线观看| 免费一级毛片在线播放高清视频| 妹子高潮喷水视频| 国产精品香港三级国产av潘金莲| 久久人妻福利社区极品人妻图片| 国产成人av教育| 亚洲欧美日韩高清在线视频| 老司机在亚洲福利影院| 亚洲国产精品999在线| 久久久精品欧美日韩精品| 麻豆成人午夜福利视频| 夜夜躁狠狠躁天天躁| 国产精品久久久久久久电影 | 亚洲一区中文字幕在线| 亚洲国产精品sss在线观看| 舔av片在线| 亚洲人成电影免费在线| 国产探花在线观看一区二区| 久久久久久免费高清国产稀缺| 国产蜜桃级精品一区二区三区| 成人午夜高清在线视频| 久久久久国产一级毛片高清牌| netflix在线观看网站| 欧美一区二区精品小视频在线| 美女高潮喷水抽搐中文字幕| 青草久久国产| 国产又黄又爽又无遮挡在线| 一边摸一边做爽爽视频免费| а√天堂www在线а√下载| 日本 欧美在线| 欧美极品一区二区三区四区| 免费在线观看视频国产中文字幕亚洲| 神马国产精品三级电影在线观看 | 欧美乱色亚洲激情| 午夜福利在线在线| 九九热线精品视视频播放| 91麻豆av在线| 少妇熟女aⅴ在线视频| 欧美av亚洲av综合av国产av| 在线观看美女被高潮喷水网站 | 一区二区三区高清视频在线| 亚洲熟妇熟女久久| 在线观看免费午夜福利视频| 亚洲精品av麻豆狂野| 999精品在线视频| 99精品欧美一区二区三区四区| 高清毛片免费观看视频网站| 国产又黄又爽又无遮挡在线| 亚洲精品在线美女| 男女床上黄色一级片免费看| 久久九九热精品免费| xxx96com| 老司机靠b影院| 一二三四社区在线视频社区8| 久久九九热精品免费| 国产在线精品亚洲第一网站| 久久婷婷成人综合色麻豆| 亚洲精品色激情综合| 两性夫妻黄色片| 久久久久久久久免费视频了| 我的老师免费观看完整版| 男女床上黄色一级片免费看| 别揉我奶头~嗯~啊~动态视频| 国内精品久久久久精免费| 久久国产精品影院| 1024香蕉在线观看| 久久性视频一级片| 欧美最黄视频在线播放免费| 18禁观看日本| 最近视频中文字幕2019在线8| 99久久精品国产亚洲精品| 亚洲中文日韩欧美视频| 色在线成人网| 人成视频在线观看免费观看| 国产av一区在线观看免费| 精品不卡国产一区二区三区| 久久精品国产清高在天天线| 午夜精品在线福利| 日日夜夜操网爽| 天天躁夜夜躁狠狠躁躁| 国产精品精品国产色婷婷| 欧美色欧美亚洲另类二区| 香蕉久久夜色| 啦啦啦免费观看视频1| 夜夜爽天天搞| 色尼玛亚洲综合影院| 三级男女做爰猛烈吃奶摸视频| 国产精品久久久久久精品电影| 一边摸一边抽搐一进一小说| 久久人妻av系列| 国产99白浆流出| 欧美黄色片欧美黄色片| 免费在线观看黄色视频的| 一级毛片高清免费大全| 国产亚洲精品第一综合不卡| 亚洲欧美一区二区三区黑人| 欧洲精品卡2卡3卡4卡5卡区| 在线a可以看的网站| 亚洲,欧美精品.| 亚洲色图 男人天堂 中文字幕| 成人一区二区视频在线观看| av天堂在线播放| 黄频高清免费视频| 校园春色视频在线观看| 夜夜看夜夜爽夜夜摸| 亚洲精品美女久久久久99蜜臀| 欧美日韩一级在线毛片| 欧美日本视频| 中文字幕人成人乱码亚洲影| 欧美成人一区二区免费高清观看 | 精品一区二区三区视频在线观看免费| 床上黄色一级片| 99热6这里只有精品| 成人永久免费在线观看视频| 一a级毛片在线观看| 最近最新免费中文字幕在线| 99热这里只有是精品50| 成人国产一区最新在线观看| 亚洲精品中文字幕一二三四区| 国产精品 欧美亚洲| 中文亚洲av片在线观看爽| 长腿黑丝高跟| 很黄的视频免费| 国产免费男女视频| 久久99热这里只有精品18| 男插女下体视频免费在线播放| 亚洲精品av麻豆狂野| 欧美日本亚洲视频在线播放| 免费人成视频x8x8入口观看| 50天的宝宝边吃奶边哭怎么回事| 人人妻,人人澡人人爽秒播| 国产亚洲精品久久久久5区| 亚洲男人的天堂狠狠| 熟女电影av网| 欧美性猛交黑人性爽| 99久久综合精品五月天人人| 亚洲人成网站在线播放欧美日韩| 19禁男女啪啪无遮挡网站| 欧美色欧美亚洲另类二区| 国产精品国产高清国产av| 一进一出好大好爽视频| 操出白浆在线播放| 岛国在线观看网站| 别揉我奶头~嗯~啊~动态视频| 亚洲av片天天在线观看| 男女下面进入的视频免费午夜| 日韩大码丰满熟妇| 午夜精品一区二区三区免费看| 亚洲全国av大片| 日本免费a在线| 亚洲第一电影网av| 久久久久久九九精品二区国产 | 中文亚洲av片在线观看爽| 女生性感内裤真人,穿戴方法视频| 亚洲欧美激情综合另类| www.999成人在线观看| 在线观看午夜福利视频| 看片在线看免费视频| 在线视频色国产色| 国模一区二区三区四区视频 | 日本免费一区二区三区高清不卡| а√天堂www在线а√下载| 国产aⅴ精品一区二区三区波| 午夜视频精品福利| 免费观看人在逋| 色尼玛亚洲综合影院| 久久久久久九九精品二区国产 | 亚洲精品在线美女| 我要搜黄色片| 国产精品一区二区免费欧美| 人人妻人人澡欧美一区二区| 十八禁人妻一区二区| 亚洲中文日韩欧美视频| 久久精品国产亚洲av香蕉五月| 精品欧美国产一区二区三| 免费一级毛片在线播放高清视频| 久久精品夜夜夜夜夜久久蜜豆 | 亚洲专区国产一区二区| 久久久久久国产a免费观看| 狂野欧美激情性xxxx| 国产精品久久久久久久电影 | АⅤ资源中文在线天堂| 久久精品国产99精品国产亚洲性色| 变态另类成人亚洲欧美熟女| 欧美日韩中文字幕国产精品一区二区三区| 校园春色视频在线观看| 国内少妇人妻偷人精品xxx网站 | 国产精品 欧美亚洲| 一进一出抽搐gif免费好疼| 91av网站免费观看| 淫妇啪啪啪对白视频| 国产野战对白在线观看| 男插女下体视频免费在线播放| 国产亚洲精品av在线| 亚洲美女视频黄频| bbb黄色大片| 曰老女人黄片| 亚洲精品粉嫩美女一区| 午夜福利成人在线免费观看| 亚洲专区中文字幕在线| 国产精品 国内视频| 麻豆一二三区av精品| 国产不卡一卡二| 后天国语完整版免费观看| 日韩国内少妇激情av| 亚洲18禁久久av| 免费看日本二区| 在线观看www视频免费| 俄罗斯特黄特色一大片| 黑人欧美特级aaaaaa片| 中文字幕人成人乱码亚洲影| 18禁黄网站禁片午夜丰满| 日韩精品中文字幕看吧| 亚洲中文av在线| 亚洲精品国产一区二区精华液| 一区二区三区高清视频在线| 日本 欧美在线| 精品高清国产在线一区| 亚洲激情在线av| 97超级碰碰碰精品色视频在线观看| 在线观看66精品国产| 国产精品自产拍在线观看55亚洲| 黑人欧美特级aaaaaa片| 一a级毛片在线观看| 免费在线观看黄色视频的| 国产精品一区二区精品视频观看| 久久中文字幕人妻熟女| 看免费av毛片| 婷婷六月久久综合丁香| 国产亚洲欧美98| 亚洲中文字幕一区二区三区有码在线看 | 亚洲av电影在线进入| 久久伊人香网站| 日本五十路高清| 国产亚洲av嫩草精品影院| 国产免费男女视频| 国产一区二区在线av高清观看| 国产成人啪精品午夜网站| 国产精品影院久久| 亚洲成av人片免费观看| 曰老女人黄片| 欧美日韩亚洲综合一区二区三区_| 亚洲在线自拍视频| 欧美zozozo另类| 欧美最黄视频在线播放免费| 在线永久观看黄色视频| 亚洲欧美精品综合久久99| 两个人的视频大全免费| 一边摸一边抽搐一进一小说| 成人高潮视频无遮挡免费网站| 国产三级黄色录像| 成人18禁高潮啪啪吃奶动态图| 精品人妻1区二区| 在线观看免费日韩欧美大片| 国内精品一区二区在线观看| 亚洲av电影在线进入| 男女那种视频在线观看| 草草在线视频免费看| e午夜精品久久久久久久| 国产99白浆流出| 一个人观看的视频www高清免费观看 | 亚洲欧美日韩高清在线视频| 99久久精品热视频| 欧美中文日本在线观看视频| 999久久久国产精品视频| 久久人妻av系列| 麻豆国产av国片精品| 亚洲av成人一区二区三| 99在线人妻在线中文字幕| 成人18禁在线播放| 97人妻精品一区二区三区麻豆| 在线观看日韩欧美| 夜夜看夜夜爽夜夜摸| 大型av网站在线播放| 中文字幕高清在线视频| 久久久水蜜桃国产精品网| 成人18禁在线播放| 日韩 欧美 亚洲 中文字幕| 黄色片一级片一级黄色片| 一边摸一边做爽爽视频免费| 男女视频在线观看网站免费 | 1024视频免费在线观看| 亚洲欧美日韩东京热| 色综合站精品国产| 亚洲欧美日韩高清在线视频| 免费电影在线观看免费观看| 蜜桃久久精品国产亚洲av| 亚洲精品一区av在线观看| 制服诱惑二区| 欧美黄色片欧美黄色片| 国产精品永久免费网站| avwww免费| 亚洲一区高清亚洲精品| 男人舔奶头视频| 一本一本综合久久| 亚洲电影在线观看av| 国产精品 国内视频| 日韩国内少妇激情av| 久久久精品欧美日韩精品| 啦啦啦韩国在线观看视频| 免费av毛片视频| 老司机福利观看| 村上凉子中文字幕在线| 在线看三级毛片| 999久久久国产精品视频| 久久中文字幕一级| 欧美高清成人免费视频www| 亚洲精品美女久久av网站| 最新美女视频免费是黄的| 亚洲精品久久成人aⅴ小说| 最新在线观看一区二区三区| 国产精品久久久久久亚洲av鲁大| 欧美色视频一区免费| 一边摸一边做爽爽视频免费| 色播亚洲综合网| 无限看片的www在线观看| 国产亚洲欧美在线一区二区| 免费观看精品视频网站| 美女高潮喷水抽搐中文字幕| xxx96com| 88av欧美| 夜夜躁狠狠躁天天躁| 国产精品,欧美在线| 日本在线视频免费播放| 国产精品久久久久久亚洲av鲁大| 三级毛片av免费| 久久久久久人人人人人| 国产欧美日韩一区二区精品| 人妻夜夜爽99麻豆av| 18禁裸乳无遮挡免费网站照片| 国产精品99久久99久久久不卡| 国产高清有码在线观看视频 | 国产一区二区激情短视频| 黑人欧美特级aaaaaa片| 深夜精品福利| 国产在线精品亚洲第一网站| 五月玫瑰六月丁香| 高潮久久久久久久久久久不卡| 精品乱码久久久久久99久播| 亚洲免费av在线视频| 亚洲色图av天堂| 久久久久久久精品吃奶| 国产成人精品久久二区二区免费| 国产蜜桃级精品一区二区三区| www国产在线视频色| 男女午夜视频在线观看| 国产成人欧美在线观看| 欧美av亚洲av综合av国产av| 久久久久国产一级毛片高清牌| 亚洲自拍偷在线| 亚洲免费av在线视频| 女人高潮潮喷娇喘18禁视频| 99久久国产精品久久久| www.自偷自拍.com| 97超级碰碰碰精品色视频在线观看| 波多野结衣高清无吗| 久99久视频精品免费| 黄色 视频免费看| 91国产中文字幕| 中文亚洲av片在线观看爽| a在线观看视频网站| 小说图片视频综合网站| 午夜免费激情av| 精品少妇一区二区三区视频日本电影| 最近最新免费中文字幕在线| 亚洲成人免费电影在线观看| 亚洲色图 男人天堂 中文字幕| 亚洲中文字幕一区二区三区有码在线看 | bbb黄色大片| 久久精品人妻少妇| 夜夜夜夜夜久久久久| 午夜免费成人在线视频| 免费看日本二区| 亚洲成人中文字幕在线播放| 校园春色视频在线观看| 丰满的人妻完整版| 男女那种视频在线观看| 黄色视频不卡| 欧美日本视频| 久久精品国产亚洲av高清一级| 亚洲自偷自拍图片 自拍| 我要搜黄色片| 曰老女人黄片| 国产成人影院久久av| 精品少妇一区二区三区视频日本电影| 久久九九热精品免费| 三级国产精品欧美在线观看 | 国产激情偷乱视频一区二区| or卡值多少钱| 一本大道久久a久久精品| 亚洲欧美一区二区三区黑人| av免费在线观看网站| 1024视频免费在线观看| 不卡一级毛片| 中文字幕精品亚洲无线码一区| 神马国产精品三级电影在线观看 | 国产精品久久久人人做人人爽| 天堂影院成人在线观看| 天堂√8在线中文| 黄色毛片三级朝国网站| 午夜福利免费观看在线| 国产免费男女视频| 日本 欧美在线| 欧美成人午夜精品| 麻豆国产av国片精品| 亚洲专区中文字幕在线| 国产精品亚洲av一区麻豆| 久久国产乱子伦精品免费另类| 成人国语在线视频| 国产精品av视频在线免费观看| 天堂影院成人在线观看| 哪里可以看免费的av片| 99久久99久久久精品蜜桃| 亚洲九九香蕉| 国语自产精品视频在线第100页| 久久精品91无色码中文字幕| 麻豆久久精品国产亚洲av| 午夜精品久久久久久毛片777| 午夜福利高清视频| 欧美色欧美亚洲另类二区| 亚洲欧美日韩无卡精品| 国产成人啪精品午夜网站| 亚洲激情在线av| 午夜精品一区二区三区免费看| 女生性感内裤真人,穿戴方法视频| 欧美高清成人免费视频www| 在线观看美女被高潮喷水网站 | 少妇裸体淫交视频免费看高清 | 久久中文字幕人妻熟女| 亚洲色图av天堂| 搡老妇女老女人老熟妇| 亚洲国产欧美网| 欧美一区二区国产精品久久精品 | 变态另类丝袜制服| 亚洲人成伊人成综合网2020| 亚洲熟女毛片儿| 免费人成视频x8x8入口观看| 99久久99久久久精品蜜桃| 天堂√8在线中文| 国产又黄又爽又无遮挡在线| 亚洲精品久久成人aⅴ小说| 女人被狂操c到高潮| 91字幕亚洲| 欧美色视频一区免费| 国产午夜精品论理片| 亚洲精品粉嫩美女一区| 九色国产91popny在线| av欧美777| 成年免费大片在线观看| 好男人电影高清在线观看| 真人一进一出gif抽搐免费| 一进一出抽搐gif免费好疼| av片东京热男人的天堂| 男女做爰动态图高潮gif福利片| 久久国产精品人妻蜜桃| 国产亚洲欧美在线一区二区| 天天一区二区日本电影三级| 一本久久中文字幕| www.自偷自拍.com| 欧美日韩亚洲国产一区二区在线观看| 岛国视频午夜一区免费看| 男男h啪啪无遮挡| 亚洲七黄色美女视频| 国产精品免费视频内射| 在线观看免费午夜福利视频| 18禁黄网站禁片免费观看直播| 国产高清videossex| 久久久水蜜桃国产精品网| 久久久久免费精品人妻一区二区| 亚洲黑人精品在线| 激情在线观看视频在线高清| 欧美日韩乱码在线| 国产1区2区3区精品| 国产91精品成人一区二区三区| 亚洲第一欧美日韩一区二区三区| av欧美777| 久久久久久久久免费视频了| 99国产综合亚洲精品| 免费看a级黄色片| 18禁观看日本| 桃红色精品国产亚洲av| 亚洲 欧美 日韩 在线 免费| 国产精品自产拍在线观看55亚洲| 看片在线看免费视频| 国产精品亚洲av一区麻豆| 国产乱人伦免费视频| 日韩大码丰满熟妇| 小说图片视频综合网站| 欧美在线一区亚洲| 欧美日韩精品网址| 欧美成人性av电影在线观看| 757午夜福利合集在线观看| 一级片免费观看大全| 亚洲人成网站在线播放欧美日韩| 给我免费播放毛片高清在线观看| 日本黄色视频三级网站网址| 国产成人影院久久av| 午夜日韩欧美国产| 免费看美女性在线毛片视频| 国产1区2区3区精品| 久久久精品欧美日韩精品| 国产熟女xx| 亚洲av第一区精品v没综合| 又黄又粗又硬又大视频| 久久精品国产清高在天天线| 香蕉久久夜色| 日韩三级视频一区二区三区| 夜夜躁狠狠躁天天躁| 免费高清视频大片| 精品久久久久久久久久免费视频| 99热只有精品国产| 欧美久久黑人一区二区| 18禁国产床啪视频网站| 最近最新中文字幕大全电影3| 欧美性猛交黑人性爽| 可以在线观看毛片的网站| 一二三四社区在线视频社区8| 啦啦啦观看免费观看视频高清| www.999成人在线观看| 精品一区二区三区av网在线观看| 五月玫瑰六月丁香| 免费观看精品视频网站| 长腿黑丝高跟| 麻豆一二三区av精品| 极品教师在线免费播放| 午夜两性在线视频| 国产区一区二久久| 丰满人妻一区二区三区视频av | 老鸭窝网址在线观看| 老熟妇仑乱视频hdxx| 精品午夜福利视频在线观看一区| 亚洲av成人av| 亚洲欧美日韩东京热| 麻豆国产av国片精品| 国产不卡一卡二| 丁香六月欧美| 一个人观看的视频www高清免费观看 | 曰老女人黄片| 18禁黄网站禁片午夜丰满| 99久久精品热视频| 亚洲午夜理论影院| 男插女下体视频免费在线播放| 2021天堂中文幕一二区在线观| 级片在线观看| 欧美性猛交╳xxx乱大交人| 亚洲中文字幕日韩| 老司机午夜福利在线观看视频| 长腿黑丝高跟| 成年版毛片免费区| 黄色片一级片一级黄色片| 色综合亚洲欧美另类图片| 99久久99久久久精品蜜桃| 十八禁人妻一区二区| 日韩成人在线观看一区二区三区| 日韩大尺度精品在线看网址| 床上黄色一级片| 99久久99久久久精品蜜桃| 亚洲一区中文字幕在线| 精品久久久久久久毛片微露脸| 欧美乱码精品一区二区三区| 俄罗斯特黄特色一大片| 亚洲自偷自拍图片 自拍| 一夜夜www| 午夜激情av网站| 欧美黑人巨大hd| 亚洲中文字幕日韩| 国产精品一及| www.精华液| 国产91精品成人一区二区三区| 亚洲天堂国产精品一区在线| 国产精品久久久久久精品电影| 久久久久久久久免费视频了| 国产一区二区激情短视频| www.www免费av| 在线观看66精品国产| tocl精华| 男女午夜视频在线观看| 亚洲欧美日韩高清在线视频| 亚洲黑人精品在线| 午夜免费成人在线视频| 50天的宝宝边吃奶边哭怎么回事| 免费人成视频x8x8入口观看| 午夜福利在线在线| 淫妇啪啪啪对白视频| 免费搜索国产男女视频| 久久欧美精品欧美久久欧美| 欧美大码av| 最近最新中文字幕大全免费视频| 嫩草影视91久久| 制服人妻中文乱码| 岛国在线免费视频观看| 亚洲av成人不卡在线观看播放网| 久久婷婷成人综合色麻豆| 久久伊人香网站| 精品国产乱码久久久久久男人| 老司机靠b影院| 国产av一区在线观看免费| 午夜亚洲福利在线播放| 日韩欧美 国产精品| 精品久久久久久久久久久久久| 制服丝袜大香蕉在线| 久久久久久人人人人人| 一本精品99久久精品77| 亚洲av熟女| 日本五十路高清| 国产99久久九九免费精品| 日本 欧美在线| 在线视频色国产色| 一级毛片高清免费大全| 青草久久国产| 久久这里只有精品中国|