周勇 應(yīng)莉 徐佳佳
[摘要] 目的 探討2型糖尿病腎病患者尿液pH值檢測(cè)的臨床意義。 方法 選擇2糖尿病患者301例和健康體檢者131例,記錄2糖尿病病程、測(cè)量患者血壓、計(jì)算BMI指數(shù),入院當(dāng)天留取晨尿檢測(cè)尿微量白蛋白、尿肌酐、尿液常規(guī),采血檢測(cè)血清生化指標(biāo)、血常規(guī)指標(biāo),計(jì)算尿微量白蛋白/肌酐比值(UACR),并將2糖尿病患者分組:正常白蛋白尿(A組)160例、微量白蛋白尿(B組)70例、大量白蛋白尿(C組)71例,分析并比較不同組別各指標(biāo)的差異,Spearman相關(guān)分析尿液pH值與其他指標(biāo)之間的相關(guān)性。 結(jié)果 除了男女比例、HDL-C、LDL-C、PLT、ALT、AST、舒張壓外,不同病情糖尿病患者基線指標(biāo)的總體差異均有統(tǒng)計(jì)學(xué)意義(P均<0.05)。不同病情2型糖尿病患者尿液pH值[A、B、C組分別為(5.64±0.59)、(5.72±0.71)、(5.86±0.75)]均顯著低于正常對(duì)照組(6.18±0.34)(P均<0.05)。隨著糖尿病腎病病情進(jìn)展,尿液pH值逐漸升高,但各組之間的檢測(cè)值有重疊,其中A與B組、B與C組之間的差異均無(wú)統(tǒng)計(jì)學(xué)意義(P均>0.05)。經(jīng)Spearman相關(guān)分析,發(fā)現(xiàn)糖尿病患者尿液pH值與收縮壓呈正相關(guān)(r=0.15,P<0.05),而與血清TBIL、UA、ALB呈負(fù)相關(guān)(r分別為-0.17、-0.18、-0.14,P均<0.05)。 結(jié)論 2糖尿病患者的尿液pH值較正常人明顯下降,但隨著DN的病情進(jìn)展,尿液pH值呈逐漸升高的趨勢(shì)。
[關(guān)鍵詞] 2型糖尿??;腎??;尿液pH值;白蛋白尿
[中圖分類(lèi)號(hào)] R000 [文獻(xiàn)標(biāo)識(shí)碼] B [文章編號(hào)] 1673-9701(2018)19-0132-03
Study on the correlation between urine pH value and type 2 diabetic nephropathy
ZHOU Yong1 YING Li2 XU Jiajia1 ZHANG Yaqiong1
1.Department of Clinical Laboratory,Taizhou Central Hospital(Taizhou University Hospital),Taizhou 318000,China;2.Department of Nursing, Taizhou Central Hospital(Taizhou University Hospital),Taizhou 318000,China
[Abstract] Objective To investigate the clinical significance of urine pH value in patients with type 2 diabetic nephropathy. Methods A total of 301 patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus(DM) and 131 healthy controls were enrolled. The course of type 2 diabetes mellitus was recorded and blood pressure was measured. BMI index was calculated. On the day of admission,urinary microalbuminuria and creatinine and urine routine were detected using morning urine samples, and serum biochemical indicators and blood routine indicators were measured using blood samples.Urine microalbumin/creatinine ratio(UACR) was calculated, and then the patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus were divided into three groups: 160 cases of normal albuminuria (group A), 70 cases of microalbuminuria(group B), 71 cases of large albuminuria(group C). The differences of each indicator among different groups were analyzed and compared. Spearman correlation analysis was used to analyze the correlation between urine pH value and other indexes. Results Except the ratio of male to female, HDL-C, LDL-C, PLT,ALT, AST and diastolic blood pressure,other baseline indicators were statistically significant(all P<0.05) among DM patients with different disease conditions. The urine pH values of DM patients with different disease conditions were(5.64±0.59), (5.72±0.71) and(5.86±0.75) in group A, B and C respectively,which were significantly lower than those in normal control group(6.18±0.34)(P<0.05). With the progress of diabetic nephropathy, urine pH value gradually increased, but the values between the groups overlapped, and there were no significant difference between group A and B, B and C(all P<0.05). According to Spearman correlation analysis, there was a positive correlation between urine pH value and systolic blood pressure(r=0.15, P<0.05), but urine pH value negatively correlated with serum TBIL, UA and ALB(r=-0.17, -0.18, -0.14, P<0.05). Conclusion The urine pH value of patients with type 2 DM decreased significantly compared with normal controls; but with the progress of DN, urine pH value showed a gradual increase trend.
[Key words] Type 2 diabetes mellitus;Nephropathy;Urine pH value;Albuminuria
糖尿病是目前危害全世界人類(lèi)健康的居首位的非傳染性疾?。╪oncommunicable diseases,NCD)之一,依據(jù)國(guó)際糖尿病聯(lián)盟最近統(tǒng)計(jì)的統(tǒng)計(jì)數(shù)據(jù),2011年全世界糖尿病患者已近3.7億,其中4/5在經(jīng)濟(jì)欠發(fā)達(dá)的發(fā)展中國(guó)家,至2030年全世界將有5.5億的糖尿病患者。糖尿病患者隨著疾病的進(jìn)展,將帶來(lái)多種機(jī)體代謝功能的紊亂,包括葡萄糖、蛋白質(zhì)及脂質(zhì)代謝等,出現(xiàn)多種急性或慢性并發(fā)癥,由此導(dǎo)致不同組織、器官內(nèi)的血管損害。其中糖尿病腎病(diabetic nephropathy,DN)是糖尿病患者的常見(jiàn)并發(fā)癥之一[1],是引起終末期腎病的重要因素[2-3]。糖尿病腎病的發(fā)病特點(diǎn)是腎小球的的高濾過(guò),繼而出現(xiàn)微量白蛋白尿,隨著腎小管間質(zhì)纖維化的發(fā)生和加深,導(dǎo)致腎功能的全面下降和惡化[4-5]。遺傳因素、代謝因素、血流動(dòng)力學(xué)改變以及免疫因素等均參與了 DN的發(fā)生發(fā)展[6-12]。尿液pH值與腎小管的酸化功能密切相關(guān),既往研究認(rèn)為糖尿病患者易出現(xiàn)尿液pH值下降[13],但尿液pH值與DN的關(guān)系仍待探討。本研究旨在探討2型糖尿病患者尿液pH值變化的影響因素,為進(jìn)一步的機(jī)制研究提供循證學(xué)依據(jù)。
1 對(duì)象與方法
1.1 研究對(duì)象
選擇2014年3月~2016年12月本院2型糖尿病(均符合WHO診斷標(biāo)準(zhǔn))住院患者301例,其中男176例,女125例,年齡20~90歲,平均(61.06±13.48)歲。排除標(biāo)準(zhǔn):(1)Ⅰ型、繼發(fā)性糖尿病患者;(2)近3個(gè)月內(nèi)出現(xiàn)糖尿病相關(guān)急性并發(fā)癥者;(3)其他腎臟疾病者。同時(shí)自健康體檢中心選擇年齡和性別相仿的檢查者131例設(shè)為正常對(duì)照組。
1.2 方法
記錄2型糖尿病病程、測(cè)量患者血壓、計(jì)算BMI指數(shù)[BMI= =體重(kg)/身高2(m2)],入院當(dāng)天留取晨尿檢測(cè)尿微量白蛋白和尿肌酐(儀器為西門(mén)子ADVIA2400全自動(dòng)生化分析儀和配套試劑盒)、尿液常規(guī)(儀器為FUS-2000尿液分析儀和配套試劑盒),采血檢測(cè)血清生化指標(biāo)(儀器為西門(mén)子ADVIA2400全自動(dòng)生化分析儀和配套試劑盒)、血常規(guī)指標(biāo)(儀器為Sysmex i2000全自動(dòng)血液分析儀和配套試劑盒)。計(jì)算尿微量白蛋白/肌酐比值(UACR),據(jù)此分為三組:正常白蛋白尿(A組)160例(UACR<30 mg/g);微量白蛋白尿(B組)70例(UACR30~300 mg/g);大量白蛋白尿(C組)71例(UACR>30 mg/g)。正常對(duì)照組均留取晨尿進(jìn)行尿液常規(guī)檢查。
1.3 統(tǒng)計(jì)學(xué)方法
采用SPSS 17.0統(tǒng)計(jì)學(xué)軟件進(jìn)行數(shù)據(jù)處理。計(jì)量資料采用(x±s)(正態(tài)分布者)和中位數(shù)(四分位數(shù)間距)(偏態(tài)分布者)表示,多組均數(shù)的比較采用方差分析和Kruskal-Walis H非參數(shù)檢驗(yàn);計(jì)數(shù)資料采用例數(shù)表示,率的比較采用χ2檢驗(yàn)。采用Spearman秩相關(guān)分析尿液pH值與其他指標(biāo)之間的相關(guān)性。P<0.05為差異有統(tǒng)計(jì)學(xué)意義。
2 結(jié)果
2.1 三組2型糖尿病患者基線指標(biāo)特點(diǎn)
除性別比例、HDL-C、LDL-C、PLT、ALT、AST、舒張壓外,多個(gè)實(shí)驗(yàn)室指標(biāo)與糖尿病腎病輕重相關(guān)(P均<0.05)。見(jiàn)表1。
2.2不同病情2型糖尿病患者和正常對(duì)照組尿液pH值比較
不同病情2型糖尿病患者尿液pH值[A、B、C組分別為(5.64±0.59)、(5.72±0.71)、(5.86±0.75)]均顯著低于正常對(duì)照組(6.18±0.34)(P均<0.05)。隨著糖尿病腎病病情進(jìn)展,尿液pH值逐漸升高,但各組之間的檢測(cè)值有重疊,其中A與B組、B與C組之間的差異均無(wú)統(tǒng)計(jì)學(xué)意義(P均>0.05)。
2.3 尿液pH值與其他指標(biāo)之間的相關(guān)性分析
經(jīng)Spearman相關(guān)分析,發(fā)現(xiàn)2型糖尿病患者尿液pH值與收縮壓呈正相關(guān)(r=0.15,P<0.05),而與血清TBIL、UA、ALB呈負(fù)相關(guān)(r分別為-0.17、-0.18、-0.14, P均<0.05)。
3 討論
流行病學(xué)調(diào)查結(jié)果表明,2型糖尿病的DN患病率超過(guò)30%[14],但DN的早期癥狀并不典型,極易出現(xiàn)漏診,及至出現(xiàn)明顯蛋白尿時(shí)現(xiàn)有治療手段將很難逆轉(zhuǎn)腎臟的損害。因此,DN的早期診斷并對(duì)癥治療十分重要。尿液分析作為臨床常規(guī)檢查項(xiàng)目,具有價(jià)格較低廉且非侵入性等優(yōu)點(diǎn),但實(shí)踐工作中臨床醫(yī)生對(duì)尿液pH值的重視往往不夠,尿液pH值與2型糖尿病以及其進(jìn)展的相關(guān)性目前仍不十分明確。
本文研究結(jié)果表明,不同病情2型糖尿病患者尿液pH值均顯著低于正常對(duì)照組,與既往國(guó)內(nèi)外的研究結(jié)論一致[15-16],糖尿病患者尿靜酸排泄(net acid excretion,NAE)增加而NH3的分泌下降導(dǎo)致尿液的過(guò)度酸性。Nakanishi N等[17]通過(guò)對(duì)1811例健康體檢者隨訪7.7年,發(fā)現(xiàn)尿液低pH值是發(fā)生3期CKD(chronic kidney disease)的獨(dú)立危險(xiǎn)因素。尿液pH的改變與尿中氫離子(H+)濃度的變換密切相關(guān),血液中H+增加(酸中毒)或繼發(fā)于腎小管分泌到尿液中H+增加將引起尿液pH下降;酸中毒以各種形式出現(xiàn),包括呼吸性酸中毒和代謝性酸中毒,后者則主要是因?yàn)槟蛞褐袖@鹽的減少所導(dǎo)致[15]。Mehta TH等[18]認(rèn)為糖尿病和糖耐量受損人群,尿液pH值下降與腎小管酸化功能障礙有關(guān),正常情況下胰島素可通過(guò)刺激腎小管合成NH3與Na+-H+交換,調(diào)節(jié)NH3的排泄影響尿液pH水平;一旦發(fā)生胰島素抵抗,將影響體內(nèi)酸堿平衡和腎小管濃縮稀釋功能,導(dǎo)致尿液pH的改變[19]。
但需要指出的是,本研究結(jié)果提示隨著糖尿病腎病病情的進(jìn)展,尿液pH值逐漸升高(雖然各組之間的檢測(cè)值有重疊)。為探討其中原因,本文進(jìn)行Spearman相關(guān)分析,發(fā)現(xiàn)糖尿病患者尿液pH值與收縮壓呈正相關(guān),而與血清TBIL、UA、ALB呈負(fù)相關(guān)。實(shí)際上對(duì)通過(guò)基線指標(biāo)的分析,本研究發(fā)現(xiàn)隨著糖尿病腎病的進(jìn)展,TBIL、ALB逐漸下降,而收縮壓和UA逐漸升高,除了UA的變化趨勢(shì)可引起尿液pH值降低外,其余指標(biāo)(TBIL、ALB和收縮壓)的變化均可導(dǎo)致尿液pH值的升高,綜合各種因素的共同作用,最終導(dǎo)致尿液pH值的逐漸升高。Ogawa S等[20]也認(rèn)為血清高尿酸與尿液低pH值密切相關(guān)(Spearman相關(guān)分析的r=-0.18,P<0.05),與本文觀點(diǎn)一致。目前關(guān)于2型糖尿病腎病進(jìn)展與尿液pH值的研究目前尚未有報(bào)道,將來(lái)仍需要大樣本的、多中心研究對(duì)本文結(jié)論予以確認(rèn)。
鑒于本文只從臨床角度分析了可能影響DN患者尿pH變化的因素,故相關(guān)解釋仍缺乏理論支撐,關(guān)于DN的病理生理改變影響尿液pH改變的具體過(guò)程和機(jī)制仍有待深入探討??傊?,2型糖尿病患者的尿液pH值較正常人明顯下降,但隨著DN的病情進(jìn)展,尿液pH值呈逐漸升高的趨勢(shì)。臨床醫(yī)生應(yīng)密切關(guān)注尿液pH值的變化,以期早期腎病的發(fā)現(xiàn)。
參考文獻(xiàn)
[1] Amagishi S,MATSUI T.Advanced glycation end products,oxidative stress and diabetic nephropathy[J].Oxid Med Cell Longev,2010,3(2):101-108.
[2] Nelson RG,Tuttle KR,Bilous RW,et al.KDOQI clinical practice guideline for diabetes and CKD: 2012 update[J]. Am J Kidney Dis,2012,60(5):850-886.
[3] Miranda AG,Pazarin L,Yanowsky FG,et al.Oxidative stress in diabetic nephropathy with early chronic kidney disease[J].J Diabe tes Res,2016,2016(1):1-7.
[4] Garg AX,Kiberd BA,Clark WF,et al. Albuminuria and renal insufficiency prevalence guides population screening:Results from the NHANES III[J].Kidney Int,2002, 61(6):2165-2175.
[5] 劉婷婷,顏紅專.糖尿病腎病發(fā)病機(jī)制研究進(jìn)展[J].牡丹江醫(yī)學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào),2017,38(3):113-116.
[6] Mooyaart AL,Valk EJ,Van EL,et a1.Genetic associations in diabetic nephropathy:A meta-analysis[J].Diabetologia,2011,54(3):544-553.
[7] Hosseini A,Abdollahi M. Diabetic neuropathy and oxidative stress:therapeutic perspectives[J]. Oxid Med Cell Longev,2013,2013:168039.
[8] 沃冠群,姚源璋.PKCα、PKCβⅠ與早期糖尿病腎病關(guān)系[J].現(xiàn)代中西醫(yī)結(jié)合雜志,2013,22(1):106-108.
[9] Eid S,Boutary S,Braych K,et al. mTORC2 signaling regulates Nox4-Induced podocyte depletion in diabetes[J].Antioxid Redox Signal,2016,25(13):703-719.
[10] Kalluri R,Neilson E G. Epithelial-mesenehymal transition and its implications for fibrosis[J].Clin Invest,2003, 112(12):1776-1784.
[11] Soetikno V,Arozal W,Louisa M,et al.New insight into the molecular drug target of diabetic nephropathy[J].Int J Endocrinol,2014,2014:968681.
[12] Chen S,Kasama Y,Lee JS,et al.Podocyte-derived vascular endothelial growth factor mediates the stimulation of 3(IV)collagen production by transforming growth factor-1 in mouse podocytes[J].Diabctcs,2004,53(11):2939-2949.
[13] Kamel KS,Cheema-Dhadli S,Halperin ML.Studies On the pathophysiology of the low urine pH in patients with uric acid stones[J].Kidney Int,2002,61(3):988-994.
[14] 畢艷.中國(guó)糖尿病慢性并發(fā)癥的流行病學(xué)研究現(xiàn)況[J].中華糖尿病雜志,2015,7(8):467-469.
[15] Maalouf NM,Cameron MA,Moe OW,et al.Metabolic basis for low urinary pH in type 2 diabetes[J]. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol,2010,5(7):1277-1281.
[16] 耿文寧,李琳琳,王燁,等.哈薩克族人群尿液代謝特征和2型糖尿病相關(guān)性研究[J].新疆醫(yī)科大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào),2010, 33(10):1165-1167.
[17] Nakanishi N,F(xiàn)ukui M,Tanaka M,et al. Low urine pH is a predictor of chronic kidney disease[J].Kidney Blood Press Res,2012,35(2):77-81.
[18] Mehta TH,Goldfarb DS.Uric acid stones and hyperuricosuria[J].Advances in Chronic Kidney Disease,2012,19(6):413-418.
[19] Gluba A,Mikhailidis DP,Lip GY,et al.Metabolic syndrome and renal disease[J]. International Journal of Cardiology,2013,164(2):141-150.
[20] Ogawa S,Nako K,Okamura M, et al.Lower urinary pH is useful for predicting renovascular disorder onset in patients with diabetes[J].BMJ Open Diabetes Research and Care,2015,3(1):e000097.
(收稿日期:2018-02-21)