• <tr id="yyy80"></tr>
  • <sup id="yyy80"></sup>
  • <tfoot id="yyy80"><noscript id="yyy80"></noscript></tfoot>
  • 99热精品在线国产_美女午夜性视频免费_国产精品国产高清国产av_av欧美777_自拍偷自拍亚洲精品老妇_亚洲熟女精品中文字幕_www日本黄色视频网_国产精品野战在线观看 ?

    A re-investigation of the bloom-forming unarmored dinoflagellate Karenia longicanalis (syn. Karenia umbella)from Chinese coastal waters*

    2018-12-22 07:00:18WANGJianyan王建艷CENJingyi岑競儀LISi李思Songhui呂頌輝MOESTRUPjvindCHANKinKa陳健嘉JIANGTao江濤LEIXiangdong雷向東
    Journal of Oceanology and Limnology 2018年6期
    關(guān)鍵詞:江濤向東

    WANG Jianyan (王建艷) , CEN Jingyi (岑競儀) , LI Si (李思) ,Lü Songhui (呂頌輝) , , MOESTRUP ?jvind , CHAN Kin-Ka (陳健嘉),JIANG Tao (江濤) , LEI Xiangdong (雷向東)

    1 Department of Science Research, Beijing Museum of Natural History, Beijing 100050, China

    2 College of Life Science and Technology, Jinan University, Guangzhou 510632, China

    3 Key Laboratory of Eutrophication and Red Tide Prevention of Guangdong Higher Education Institutes, Jinan University,Guangzhou 510632, China

    4 Marine Biological Section, Department of Biology, University of Copenhagen, Universitetsparken 4, DK-2100 Copenhagen ?,Denmark

    5 School of Science & Technology, Open University of Hong Kong, 999077 Kowloon, Hong Kong, China

    6 Key Laboratory of Sustainable Development of Marine Fisheries, Ministry of Agriculture, Yellow Sea Fisheries Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Fishery Sciences, Qingdao 266071, China

    7 Wenzhou Marine Environmental Monitoring Center Station, State Oceanic Administration, Wenzhou 325013, China

    Abstract The dinoflagellate genus Karenia is known for recurrent harmful blooms worldwide. However,species diversity of the genus is generally overlooked owing to the difficulty of identifying small unarmored dinoflagellates. We have established four clonal cultures of Karenia longicanalis isolated from the type locality, Hong Kong harbor (strain HK01) and other three locations along the Chinese coasts (strains YB01,DT01, and NJ01). The morphology of the strain was studied by light and scanning electron microscopy (LM and SEM) and the pigment composition analyzed by high-performance liquid chromatography. We provide the first molecular data of K. longicanalis based on the large subunit (LSU) rRNA gene sequence and internal transcribed spacer (ITS). The four strains showed identical LSU rDNA sequences with a similarity of 99.4% to the holotype of Karenia umbella (strain KUTN05) from Australia. In the ITS phylogeny, the sequence of K. umbella branched between the Chinese strains of K. longicanalis. A careful comparison of the morphology of K. longicanalis and K. umbella reveals the similarity in the diagnostic characters.Differences may appear due to the sample treatment for SEM. We conclude that K. umbella is a junior synonym of K. longicanalis.

    Keyword: harmful algal blooms (HABs); phytoplankton; morphology; phylogeny; large subunit (LSU)rRNA; internal transcribed spacer (ITS)

    1 INTRODUCTION

    The Kareniaceae has been recognized as a separate family, different from the large polyphyletic generaGymnodiniumF. Stein andGyrodiniumKofoid &Swezy (Bergholtz et al., 2005). The family was erected to encompass the three gymnodinioid dinoflagellate generaKareniaGert Hansen &Moestrup,KarlodiniumJ. Larsen andTakayamade Salas, Bolch, Botes & Hallegraeff . Species of Kareniaceae are characterized by a straight or sigmoid apical groove on the epicone. Another key feature of this family is pigments of the chloroplasts, fucoxanthin or fucoxanthin-derivatives being the main accessory pigments (Daugbjerg et al., 2000; de Salas et al., 2003;Bergholtz et al., 2005). Gómez et al. (2005) suggested the phylogenetic relationship betweenBrachidiniumF. J.R. Taylor andKareniathat was later confirmed by molecular data (Henrichs et al., 2011).

    Species ofKareniaare well known to form recurrent blooms in many parts of the world. Many species are responsible for harmful algal bloom events such as large-scale fish kills, other marine mortality,neurotoxic shellfish poisoning (NSP) and even respiratory problems in humans (Chang, 1999; Tester et al., 2000; Yang et al., 2000; Kempton et al., 2002;Botes et al., 2003; de Salas et al., 2004a, b; Naar et al.,2007; Hoagland et al., 2009 etc.), and most species of the genus may turn out to be toxic (Brand et al., 2012).Further studies have revealed thatKareniaspecies can produce a variety of toxins, e.g. brevetoxin inKareniabrevis(C.C. Davis) Gert Hansen & Moestrup(Lin et al., 1981; Shimizu et al., 1986), gymnocin inKareniamikimotoi(Miyake & Kominami ex Oda)Gert Hansen & Moestrup (Satake et al., 2002, 2005),gymnodimine inKareniaselliformisHaywood,Steidinger & L. MacKenzie (Seki et al., 1995; Miles et al., 2003), brevisulcatic acids inKarenia brevisulcata(F. H. Chang) Gert Hansen & Moestrup(Holland et al., 2012), polyether brevetoxin-2 (PbTx-2) inKareniapapilionaceaHaywood & Steidinger(Fowler et al., 2015) and toxic sterols or polyunsaturated fatty acids (PUFAs) (Mooney et al., 2007).

    Accurate identification ofKareniaspecies is based on analysis of cell characteristics, such as overall shape of cell, cell length and width, dorsoventral flatness of the cell, the shape and the length of the apical groove, the length of the cingular displacement,presence or absence of the sulcal intrusion, shape and location of the cell nucleus, chloroplast number and distribution in the cell, etc. (Daugbjerg et al., 2000;Hansen et al., 2000; Yang et al., 2000; Botes et al.,2003; Haywood et al., 2004; de Salas et al., 2004a, b).WhenKareniaspecies are present in low numbers in field samples, they are readily overlooked, and special attentions are mainly paid when they attain high concentrations or form a bloom. The species may be difficult to identify owing to their small size(approximately 20 μm in length and 10 μm in width)and the naked cells, which can be easily deformed in fixatives, e.g. Lugol’s solution or formaldehyde. It is generally only after the species have been isolated and cultured in the lab that its toxic potential can be determined. In addition, someKareniaspecies are probably mixotrophic (Siano et al., 2009) and hard to culture, and the lacking of strains in culture further complicates species identification.

    Thirteen species ofKareniahave been described(Gómez, 2012). In the Chinese coastal waters, seven species have been detected (K.brevis,K.brevisulcata(F. H. Chang) Gert Hansen & Moestrup,K.digitataZ.B. Yang, H. Takayama, Matsuoka & Hodgkiss,K.mikimotoi,K.longicanalisZ. B. Yang, Hodgkiss &Gert Hansen,K.bicuneiformisBotes, Sym & G. C.Pitcher, andK.papilionacea) (Liu, 2008; Law and Lee, 2013).

    In this study, aKareniaspecies was isolated from the East and South China Sea. Based on light and electron microscopy, pigment composition, and rDNA sequences (partial LSU and ITS), we identified it asKarenialongicanalisthat was originally described from Hong Kong harbor after a bloom in 1998 (Yang et al., 2001). We compared the morphology and molecular data ofK.longicanalisandK.umbellade Salas, Bolch & Hallegraeff (de Salas et al., 2004a),and we concluded that these taxa are conspecific with priority forK.longicanalis.

    2 MATERIAL AND METHOD

    2.1 Sampling and culturing

    Karenialongicanalisstrains DT01 and NJ01 were established by isolating single cells from seawater samples collected at Dongtou Island (27°51′29″N,121°09′09″E) and Nanji Island (27°27′22″N,121°06′00″E) in the East China Sea on 25 June 2016.Strain YB01 was from seawater samples collected from Dongyu Pier (22°33′31″N, 114°32′22″E), Daya Bay off the South China Sea on 29 April 2016. The three clonal cultures DT01, NJ01, and YB01 were all collected from field samples. Strain HK01 was isolated from Yim Tin Sai, Tolo Harbour of Hong Kong (22°27′14″N, 114°12′50″E) during aKareniabloom event in January 2016. All the cultures were maintained at 20°C in L1 medium (Guillard and Hargraves, 1993) at a salinity of 30, using an irradiance of 50 μmol photons/(m2·s) in a 12 h:12 h light:dark cycle, and deposited at the Research Center for Harmful Algae and Marine Biology, Jinan University, Guangzhou, China. The culture HK01 was lost after the molecular analyses.

    2.2 Light microscopy (LM)

    Cells were examined under an Olympus BX61 microscope (Olympus, Tokyo, Japan). Light micrographs were captured using a QImaging Retiga 4000R digital camera (QImaging, Surrey, BC,Canada). Cells (more than 20 individuals) in exponential phase were photographed under the microscope at ×400 magnification, and the cell length and width were measured using Image-Pro Plus 6.0 image acquisition and analysis software(QImaging, Surrey, BC, Canada). For epifluorescence micrographs, cultured cells in exponential phase were stained by adding an equal volume of 4’,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole dihydrochloride(DAPI) (Sangon Biotech, Shanghai, China) at a concentration of 5 μg/mL, and incubation in the dark at room temperature for 5 min. Cells were photographed using an Olympus BX61 microscope fitted with 360–370 nm excitation and 420–460 nm emission filters.

    2.3 Scanning electron microscopy (SEM)

    Three different fixation methods were used. In the first procedure, healthy cultured cells were fixed at 4°C overnight in glutaraldehyde at a final concentration of 2.5%, and then filtered through nuclepore filters with a pore size of 3 μm (Whatman,Little Chalfont, UK), followed by dehydration in an ethanol series of 10%, 30%, 50%, 70%, 90% and 95%, 5 min in each change, and finally in 100% for 10 min (two changes). In the second procedure,healthy cultured cells were fixed with an equal volume of 4% OsO4(prepared with filtered seawater)for 1 h at room temperature. The fixed culture was rinsed once in seawater and once in deionized water.The cells were dehydrated in an ethanol series of 10%, 30%, 50%, 70% and 90%, this time 10 min in each change, followed by two changes of 100% for 15 min. In the third procedure, field seawater samples were preserved in Lugol’s solution in situ (final concentration was about 1%) and post fixed at 4°C overnight in glutaraldehyde at a final concentration of 2.5%. Cells were dehydrated as in the first procedure. All dehydrated samples were criticalpoint dried using a Leica EM CPD300 Critical Point Dryer (Leica Microsystems, Mannheim, Germany),and the preparations subsequently sputter-coated with gold. Cells were observed in a field emission scanning electron microscope (FEI QUANTA 200F,Hillsboro, USA).

    2.4 Pigment analysis

    Ten milliliter algal culture in mid exponential phase was filtered onto 0.45 μm pore size Whatman GF/F glass fibre filters (Whatman, Maidstone, UK)and stored in a refrigerator at -80°C for later treatment.Pigment extraction and analysis were performed according to the methods described in Zapata et al.(2000). The filters were cut into pieces, transferred to a centrifuge, and then extracted with 3 mL 95%methanol in a sonication bath containing ice and water for 5 min under low light. The extract was filtered through a Teflon film with a pore size of 0.2 μm to remove cellular debris. One milliliter of the extract was mixed with 0.2 mL Milli-Q water, and 100 μL aliquot of the mixture was analyzed using reverse-phase HPLC. The HPLC system Agilent 1200 series is equipped with an auto sampler and diodearray detector (Model G1315C; Agilent Technologies Inc., Palo Alto, CA, USA). Pigments extracted were separated by a C8 column (Waters Symmetry,150 mm×4.6 mm, 3.5 μm particle size) thermostated at 25°C.

    Pigments were identified and quantified using the following 23 pure pigment standards (DHI Inc,Copenhagen, Denmark): chlorophylla(Chla),chlorophyllb(Chlb), chlorophyllc2 (Chlc2),chlorophyllc3 (Chlc3), fucoxanthin (Fuco),diadinoxanthin (Dia-dino), peridinin (Peri),violaxanthin (Viola), alloxanthin (Allo), diatoxanthin(Diato), β, β-carotene (β, β-Car), prasinoxanthin(Pras), lutein (Lut), neoxanthin (Neo), zeaxanthin(Zea), 19’-hexanoyloxy-fucoxanthin (Hex-fuco),19’-butanoyloxy-fucoxanthin (But-fuco),pheophorbidea(Pheidea), canthaxanthin (Cantha),divinyl chlorophyll a (DV-Chla), pheophytina(Phea), Mg-2,4-divinylpheoporphyrin (MgDVP), and gyroxanthin diester (Gyr-de).

    2.5 DNA extraction and amplification of LSU and ITS

    About 10 mL of cell culture in exponential growth was collected by centrifugation, and total genomic DNA was extracted using a Takara MiniBEST Universal Genomic DNA Extraction Kit (TaKaRa,Dalian, China) according to the manufacturer’s protocol. LSU rDNA (D1-D3 region) and ITS regions were amplified using primers D1R (Scholin et al.,1994) and D3B (Nunn et al., 1996) and primers ITS1 and ITS4 (White et al., 1990). The temperature profile for the PCR amplification was 94°C for 3 min followed by 38 cycles of 94°C for 30 s, 57°C for 30 s,and 72°C for 1 min, with an extension at 72°C for 6 min. PCR products were purified and sent to Beijing Genomics Institute (BGI, Guangzhou, China) for sequencing.

    Fig.1 Light micrographs of Karenia longicanalis (strain YB01)

    2.6 Sequence alignment and phylogenetic analysis

    Sequences similar to our LSU rDNA and ITS sequences were identified using the BLAST server(https://blast.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov) and downloaded from GenBank. Details of sequences used for phylogenetic analysis were shown in Table S1 and Table S2.Sequences for phylogenetic analysis were aligned using ClustalX (Thompson et al., 1997). Sequence distances (percent identity and divergence) were calculated with the Megalign program within the DNASTAR sequence analysis package. Phylogenetic analyses were conducted using the Maximumlikelihood (ML) and Bayesian inference (BI) analyses.ML analysis was performed using MEGA version 6.0(Tamura et al., 2013) with the Kimura 2-parameter model and supported by 1 000 bootstrap replicates.Bayesian analyses were done using Mrbayes 3.1.2 following the best-fitting model (Ronquist and Huelsenbeck, 2003) and the best-fit model selected by MrModelTest 2.2 were SYM + G and GTR + G for LSU and ITS data set, respectively. The confidence limits were estimated using bootstrap analysis with 1 000 replications.

    3 RESULT

    3.1 Morphology of Karenia longicanalis

    Karenialongicanalisis a relatively large-sized species compared to otherKareniaspecies. The cells are slightly dorsoventrally flattened. Length, width and length-width ratio of the three strains (YB01,DT01 and NJ01) are shown in Table 1. Cells have a conical epicone and an asymmetric hypocone(Fig.1a–c). The hypocone is truncated, the right lobe longer than the left lobe (Fig.1b, c). The apical groove is straight and very long, and it is clearly visible in the LM (Fig.1a). The cingulum is incised and displaced about 20% of the total cell length (Fig.1c). The sulcus is wide in the hypocone but becomes narrow in the inter-cingular region, and extends as a finger-like intrusion onto the epicone (Fig.1c). The cell possesses about 20 chloroplasts. Chloroplasts are bright yellowgreen, with many lobes (Fig.1d, e). The nucleus is round and centrally located close to the cell’s dorsal side (Fig.1f).

    Fig.2 Scanning electron micrographs of Karenia longicanalis (strain YB01, fixed in OsO 4)

    Table 1 Cell size of the three Karenia longicanalis strains isolated in this study

    Under SEM, eight furrows are seen to radiate from the cell apex to the upper margin of the cingulum(Fig.2a, b, c, e). The apical groove is clearly observed extending down the ventral and dorsal sides of the epicone (Fig.2a–d), on the ventral side extending below the upper section of the cingulum (Fig.2b). The sulcal intrusion onto the epicone is short (Fig.2a, b). On the dorsal side, the apical groove extends about 1/2–2/3 or even 3/4 down the epicone (Fig.2c, d). It is shallow and less than 1 μm wide. One or more lateral pores are sometimes present on the ventral part of the hypocone,and usually on the left lobe of the hypocone (Fig.2f, g).Samples fixed in glutaraldehyde (Fig.3)were a little more swollen compared to samples fixed in OsO4.Lateral pores were not observed in the glutaraldehyde fixation and the furrows on the epicone were hard to see (Fig.3). Under SEM observations, the Lugolpreserved cells showed clearly a long apical groove,which extended near the upper cingulum (Fig.4a–c).Striae were usually not visible. The sulcal intrusion was short and sometimes could not be observed(Fig.4c). Lateral pores were regularly observed on the left lobe of the hypocone, numbering from one to four and clustering in different shapes (Fig.4d, e).

    3.2 Pigments composition of Karenia longicanalis

    A HPLC profile ofK.longicanalis(strain YB01) is shown in Fig.5. Five chlorophylls, Chla, Chlc2, Chlc3, pheophorbideaand MgDVP were detected. Eight carotenoids were also detected, of which fucoxanthin was the most abundant. The abundance of chlorophyll and carotenoid pigments expressed as mass ratios with respect to Chlaare shown in Table 2. The chromatogram (Fig.5) is very similar to previous reports onK.umbella, with some differences in the concentration of pigments.

    Fig.3 Scanning electron micrographs of Karenia longicanalis (strain YB01, fixed in glutaraldehyde)

    Fig.4 Scanning electron micrographs of Karenia longicanalis (field samples, preserved in Lugol’s solution in situ and post fixed in glutaraldehyde)

    Table 2 Summary of HPLC pigment composition of K ar e nia longicanalis and their abundance (abundance of pigments is expressed in proportion to Chl a

    Fig.5 Pigment chromatogram of Karenia longicanalis (strain YB01) from Daya Bay, Guangdong, China

    Table 3 Partial LSU sequence comparison among different Karenia longicanalis/ K. umbella

    3.3 Molecular phylogeny

    LSU rDNA sequences of the four strains DT01,YB01, NJ01 and HK01 (941 base pairs) ofK.longicanaliswere obtained and deposited in GenBank under accession numbers KY216192 to KY216194 and KY287670. The four strains of this study share identical LSU rDNA sequences with a similarity of 99.4% to the holotype ofKareniaumbella(strain KUTN05, AY263963) (Table 3). The ML and BI methods yielded similar phylogenetic trees, hence only the ML tree is shown (Fig.6). Our strains(boldface in Fig.6) grouped with other strains identified asK.umbellawith support values of 61/0.89(bootstrap values for ML analysis/posterior probabilities for BI analysis), with cultures from Australia, eastern North America, France and New Zealand clustering in a separate clade. All sequences clustered with the otherKareniaspecies with strong support (99/1).

    Fig.6 Phylogenetic tree (maximum-likelihood, ML) of Karenia longicanalis and its closely related species based on partial LSU sequences (578 bp in the final alignment)

    Table 4 Sequence divergence among different Karenia species based on ITS sequences (507 bp)

    ITS sequences of the four strains (YB01, DT01,NJ01 and HK01) ofK.longicanaliswere obtained and deposited in GenBank under accession numbers MF781065 to MF781068. The divergence among different cultures ofK.longicanalis/K.umbellaranged from 0.002 to 0.015, while the congeneric interspecific divergence ranged from 0.082 to 0.234(Table 4). The ML and BI analysis based on ITS sequences generated similar phylogenetic tree (Fig.7).Sequences of our cultures clustered with the holotype ofK.umbellawith strong support (98/0.99).

    Fig.7 Phylogenetic tree (maximum-likelihood, ML) of Karenia longicanalis and its closely related species based on ITS sequences

    4 DISCUSSION

    Kareniaumbellawas recognized as a separate species based on cell morphology, pigment composition and molecular genetics (de Salas et al.,2004a). A bloom ofK.umbelladrew attention to the species when it caused mortality of caged rainbow trout in Murdunna, Australia in December 1989. A subsequent, more serious mortality event led to death of 100 000 Atlantic salmon in Tasmania, Australia in May 2003 (de Salas et al., 2004a). Till now,K.umbellahas been reported from Australia (de Salas et al., 2004a), New Zealand coastal waters (Chang et al.,2012), France and eastern North America (Nézan et al., 2014) and Japan (Omura et al., 2012).

    Kareniaumbellais a relatively large species of the genusKarenia. The most typical features of this species are the size, the conical epicone, the asymmetrical hypocone and the eight radial furrows on the epicone. Morphological characteristics ofK.umbellaare, however, very similar to those ofK.longicanalis, a bloom-forming species described from Victoria Harbour, Hong Kong (Yang et al.,2001).K.umbellawas described to differ fromK.longicanalisin size, the shape of epicone and hypocone, the sulcal intrusion, the presence of epiconal furrows, and the shape and number of chloroplasts (Table 5) (Yang et al., 2001; de Salas et al., 2004a).

    According to de Salas et al. (2004a),K.umbellais clearly larger thanK.longicanalis. The cell length and width ofK.umbellawere given by de Salas et al.(2004a) as 29–42 μm (average 35.85) and 21–32 μm(average 26.61), respectively, while those ofK.longicanaliswere 17.5–35 μm (average 25.9) and 10–22.5 μm (average 21.1) (Yang et al., 2001). In our study, the DT01 and YB01 strains were similar in size toK.umbellain de Salas et al. (2004a), but the NJ01 strain was similar toK.longicanalisin Yang et al.(2001) that measured field cells. There are no significant differences in size between our strains ofK.longicanalisandK.umbella. It should be noted that the size of the cell may vary with the culturing conditions.

    Yang et al. (2001) described a critical feature ofK.longicanalisto be its extremely long apical groove which extended down over the upper level of the cingulum. In this study, the apical groove was equally long and reached the same level as inK.longicanalis.De Salas et al. (2004a) mentioned that the length of the apical groove on the dorsal side of the two species is different, the ratio inK.longicanalisbeing 2/3 down the epicone, whereasK.umbellait was 1/2.However, the length of apical groove may be affected by fixation during the preparation procedure of SEM,and our study revealed that the ratio of our material ranged from 1/2 to 2/3.

    Table 5 A morphological comparison between Karenia umbella and Karenia longicanalis

    The sulcal extension is also considered to be an important distinguishing feature, asK.umbellawas described with a short and finger-like sulcal intrusion onto the epicone, angling about 45° to the sulcus,while no sulcal intrusion was described inK.longicanalis. The sulcal extension ofK.umbellacould easily be observed under the LM by de Salas et al. (2004a), but in their SEM, notably Fig.I, there is no sulcal extension. A sulcal extension was not observed inK.longicanalis, neither in LM nor in SEM. In our study, we found that in cells in healthy state, the sulcal intrusion could be easily observed under LM. In the SEM, when our material was fixed in OsO4, cells were well preserved and the sulcal intrusion clearly visible. However, in cells fixed in glutaraldehyde or Lugol’s solution, the cells were more easily deformed; the sulcal intrusion was short or even missing (e.g. Fig.4a–c). Yang et al. (2001)examined cells by SEM that were preserved using the same Lugol’s solution concentration as in our study.We surmise that the Lugol’s solution fixative and the SEM preparation may be the reasons for the absence of a sulcal extension inK.longicanalis. In fact, Yang et al. (2001) mentioned that “the very delicate sulcal projection could have been lost inKarenialongicanalisduring the preparation for scanning electron microscopy”.

    De Salas et al. (2004a) describedK.umbellaas having approximately 20 peripherally located,irregular and multi-lobed chloroplasts, whereasK.longicanalishad about 30 globular chloroplasts.We observed that in our material, chloroplasts were irregular and multi-lobed, while chloroplasts in unhealthy state, such as barely moving cells, the chloroplasts became globular. Chloroplasts ofK.umbellapresented by Omura et al. (2012) are globular and very similar to those described inK.longicanalis. In someKareniaspecies, the chloroplast becomes circular in shape when fixed (Botes et al.,2003); we also found that chloroplasts of our material fixed in Lugol’s solution became somewhat rounded.Therefore, the chloroplast is not a reliable character to differentiate the two species.

    Kareniaumbellawas characterized by eight radial furrows on the epicone when seen in the SEM, which gave rise to the species name (de Salas et al., 2004a).However, the furrows are very easily lost during the preparation of SEM. We have tested samples fixed in different fixatives for SEM, such as Lugol’s solution,glutaraldehyde and OsO4, and found that most cells fixed in glutaraldehyde and Lugol’s solution have lost the furrows during the preparation, only cells fixed in OsO4solution retained the furrows. Furrows were not observed inK.longicanalis; whether this is due to the cells being fixed in Lugol’s solution is not known but it is likely. In another species of the Kareniaceae,Karlodiniumgentienii, Nézan et al. (2014) observed a somewhat similar phenomenon. In some fixation cocktails numerous radiating striae were clearly visible on the epicone while in others no such striae could be observed. Another puzzling feature in whichK.umbellais thought to differ fromK.longicanalisis the presence of several deep pores on the left ventral hypocone or epicone, or both (de Salas et al., 2004a).The number of pores was variable and they are not easily preserved in the SEM. We observed these pores only in the hypocone, showing a variable number.The role of the pores is uncertain as well as its use as a diagnostic character.

    No information on DNA sequences ofK.longicanalisis available in GenBank and the species was not obtained in culture when described from Victoria Harbour, Hong Kong by Yang et al.(2001). A comparison of the partial LSU rDNA of a strain identified asK.longicanalis(strain HK2) from Hong Kong andK.umbellafrom New Zealand (strain CAWD65 and GenBank No. AY947664) performed by Gu (2007) revealed that the two species have a high similarity of 99.43% and only differed in 4 out of the total 713 bases sequenced, suggesting the two species to be conspecific. In this study, the similarity among different cultures ofK.longicanalis/K.umbellaranged from 99.3% to 100.0% (based on partial LSU sequences, 708 bp). The four Chinese strains share identical LSU rDNA sequences with a similarity of 99.4% to the holotype ofK.umbella(strain KUTN05,AY263963) and as well as to the strain CAWD65 used in Gu (2007), and they are also different in 4 bases. Therefore, the morphological comparison and the phylogenetic data confirm thatK.longicanalisandK.umbellaare conspecific.

    5 CONCLUSION

    Morphological and molecular of the data reveal that there is no reliable difference betweenK.longicanalisandK.umbella. We conclude that these species are synonyms with priority forK.longicanalis.

    6 DATA AVAILABILITY STATEMENT

    The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon request.

    7 ACKNOWLEDGEMENT

    We sincerely thank Dr. GUAN Wanchun of Wenzhou Medical University for assistance in the field sample collection. Special appreciation is expressed to Dr. LUO Zhaohe of the Third Institute of Oceanography, the State Oceanic Administration for helpful discussions regarding the SEM preparation.We would also like to thank XIA Xiaofei of Beijing Museum of Natural History for his support during SEM photography.

    Table S1 Information of LSU rDNA sequences used in this study for phylogenetic analysis

    Table S1 Continued

    Table S2 Information of ITS sequences used in this study for phylogenetic analysis

    猜你喜歡
    江濤向東
    精研“氯及其化合物”
    中學化學(2024年2期)2024-06-17 04:01:47
    愛情如衣
    百花園(2023年2期)2023-02-15 10:13:09
    我的爸爸
    河南電力(2022年3期)2022-03-18 05:48:06
    趕集歸來
    金秋(2021年24期)2021-12-01 11:15:21
    土酒
    決策探索(2018年23期)2018-12-17 01:35:56
    于向東
    寶藏(2018年1期)2018-04-18 07:39:21
    改革強軍打頭陣
    撥亂反正 夯實基礎(chǔ)
    火車向東
    小說月刊(2014年12期)2014-04-19 02:40:17
    Preparation and characterization of TiO2-SiO2-Fe3O4 core-shell powders in nano scale
    亚洲欧美成人精品一区二区| 午夜激情久久久久久久| 久久精品久久精品一区二区三区| 国产精品久久久久成人av| 日日摸夜夜添夜夜爱| 高清欧美精品videossex| 又黄又粗又硬又大视频| 亚洲图色成人| 伦精品一区二区三区| 满18在线观看网站| 精品久久久久久电影网| 黄色毛片三级朝国网站| 黄色 视频免费看| a级片在线免费高清观看视频| 午夜福利网站1000一区二区三区| 久久久久视频综合| 最近手机中文字幕大全| 一个人免费看片子| 精品国产露脸久久av麻豆| 制服诱惑二区| 国产综合精华液| 最近的中文字幕免费完整| 国产精品久久久av美女十八| 精品国产乱码久久久久久男人| 搡女人真爽免费视频火全软件| 国产成人av激情在线播放| 人妻少妇偷人精品九色| 亚洲国产看品久久| 亚洲人成77777在线视频| 男女下面插进去视频免费观看| 免费人妻精品一区二区三区视频| 日本av免费视频播放| 亚洲欧洲国产日韩| 精品一区在线观看国产| 亚洲欧美一区二区三区国产| 人妻 亚洲 视频| 精品福利永久在线观看| 日韩大片免费观看网站| 国产在视频线精品| av在线老鸭窝| 女人久久www免费人成看片| 男人操女人黄网站| 日本爱情动作片www.在线观看| 亚洲三区欧美一区| 亚洲第一青青草原| 亚洲激情五月婷婷啪啪| 久久久精品94久久精品| 最近2019中文字幕mv第一页| 两个人免费观看高清视频| 男的添女的下面高潮视频| 亚洲av福利一区| 高清欧美精品videossex| 久久久a久久爽久久v久久| 成人亚洲欧美一区二区av| 日韩不卡一区二区三区视频在线| 久久国产亚洲av麻豆专区| 在线亚洲精品国产二区图片欧美| www.av在线官网国产| 久久精品国产鲁丝片午夜精品| 久久久久精品人妻al黑| 久久精品国产自在天天线| 久久青草综合色| 国产成人欧美| 久久毛片免费看一区二区三区| 亚洲精品美女久久久久99蜜臀 | 亚洲图色成人| 欧美日韩综合久久久久久| 精品国产一区二区久久| 午夜91福利影院| 亚洲伊人色综图| 欧美老熟妇乱子伦牲交| 欧美日韩一区二区视频在线观看视频在线| 在线观看三级黄色| av女优亚洲男人天堂| 成年女人在线观看亚洲视频| 91午夜精品亚洲一区二区三区| 一级毛片电影观看| 国产精品国产三级国产专区5o| 熟女av电影| 欧美精品人与动牲交sv欧美| 男女高潮啪啪啪动态图| 麻豆乱淫一区二区| 久久久久精品人妻al黑| 一区二区av电影网| av电影中文网址| 国产精品麻豆人妻色哟哟久久| 欧美激情高清一区二区三区 | 91在线精品国自产拍蜜月| 久热久热在线精品观看| 久久久久国产网址| 亚洲欧洲国产日韩| 午夜老司机福利剧场| 日日啪夜夜爽| 狠狠婷婷综合久久久久久88av| 日本wwww免费看| 好男人视频免费观看在线| 高清在线视频一区二区三区| 国产有黄有色有爽视频| 一级片'在线观看视频| 亚洲国产色片| 国产成人午夜福利电影在线观看| 欧美日韩视频精品一区| 国产精品久久久久久av不卡| 免费黄频网站在线观看国产| 最近最新中文字幕大全免费视频 | 亚洲综合色惰| 女性被躁到高潮视频| 日韩一区二区视频免费看| 久久久亚洲精品成人影院| 搡老乐熟女国产| 妹子高潮喷水视频| 看十八女毛片水多多多| 成年女人毛片免费观看观看9 | 国产精品 欧美亚洲| 免费黄色在线免费观看| 成年人免费黄色播放视频| 日韩不卡一区二区三区视频在线| 99久久精品国产国产毛片| 美女中出高潮动态图| 久久免费观看电影| 人人妻人人添人人爽欧美一区卜| 亚洲精品国产av蜜桃| 成人亚洲欧美一区二区av| xxx大片免费视频| 国产 精品1| 宅男免费午夜| 26uuu在线亚洲综合色| videossex国产| 美女午夜性视频免费| a级毛片在线看网站| 亚洲国产精品一区三区| 中文字幕制服av| 大陆偷拍与自拍| 一级片'在线观看视频| 麻豆乱淫一区二区| 亚洲经典国产精华液单| 国产97色在线日韩免费| 曰老女人黄片| 午夜福利,免费看| 日韩伦理黄色片| videossex国产| 亚洲国产看品久久| 如日韩欧美国产精品一区二区三区| 少妇猛男粗大的猛烈进出视频| 极品少妇高潮喷水抽搐| 欧美激情高清一区二区三区 | 国产精品久久久久久久久免| 最近2019中文字幕mv第一页| 国产欧美日韩一区二区三区在线| 亚洲欧美色中文字幕在线| 亚洲欧美一区二区三区黑人 | 热re99久久精品国产66热6| av视频免费观看在线观看| 最近最新中文字幕大全免费视频 | 狠狠婷婷综合久久久久久88av| 亚洲国产av影院在线观看| 亚洲国产精品一区三区| 韩国高清视频一区二区三区| 亚洲欧美成人精品一区二区| 这个男人来自地球电影免费观看 | 免费观看性生交大片5| 欧美成人午夜精品| 国产色婷婷99| 国产有黄有色有爽视频| 国产一区亚洲一区在线观看| 天天躁日日躁夜夜躁夜夜| 亚洲国产成人一精品久久久| 国产伦理片在线播放av一区| 99精国产麻豆久久婷婷| 91国产中文字幕| 国产成人av激情在线播放| 在线 av 中文字幕| 日韩电影二区| 免费女性裸体啪啪无遮挡网站| 精品一区二区三区四区五区乱码 | 成年女人在线观看亚洲视频| 中文字幕亚洲精品专区| 亚洲成人一二三区av| 久久av网站| 久久99蜜桃精品久久| 男女国产视频网站| 国产成人aa在线观看| 免费在线观看完整版高清| 如日韩欧美国产精品一区二区三区| 精品少妇久久久久久888优播| 九九爱精品视频在线观看| 免费女性裸体啪啪无遮挡网站| 亚洲成国产人片在线观看| 国产老妇伦熟女老妇高清| 少妇被粗大的猛进出69影院| 欧美精品一区二区免费开放| 日日摸夜夜添夜夜爱| 欧美av亚洲av综合av国产av | 又大又黄又爽视频免费| 亚洲国产最新在线播放| av线在线观看网站| 久久鲁丝午夜福利片| 波多野结衣一区麻豆| 欧美精品av麻豆av| 麻豆精品久久久久久蜜桃| 一本一本久久a久久精品综合妖精 国产伦在线观看视频一区 | 丁香六月天网| 亚洲国产精品国产精品| 亚洲成人一二三区av| 成年女人在线观看亚洲视频| 国产一区二区三区av在线| 亚洲国产精品一区三区| 大片免费播放器 马上看| 亚洲欧美精品综合一区二区三区 | freevideosex欧美| av免费在线看不卡| 欧美日韩精品网址| 在线精品无人区一区二区三| av福利片在线| 国产1区2区3区精品| 久久久久久人人人人人| 日韩,欧美,国产一区二区三区| 大香蕉久久成人网| 久久午夜综合久久蜜桃| 性色av一级| 精品少妇黑人巨大在线播放| 制服诱惑二区| √禁漫天堂资源中文www| 日韩一区二区三区影片| 国产又色又爽无遮挡免| 男的添女的下面高潮视频| 免费av中文字幕在线| 久久久精品区二区三区| 欧美日本中文国产一区发布| 搡女人真爽免费视频火全软件| 久久影院123| 另类精品久久| 久久这里有精品视频免费| 电影成人av| 亚洲精品国产色婷婷电影| 国产无遮挡羞羞视频在线观看| 赤兔流量卡办理| 街头女战士在线观看网站| 观看美女的网站| 99久久人妻综合| 亚洲av电影在线进入| 亚洲av男天堂| 国语对白做爰xxxⅹ性视频网站| 国产一区有黄有色的免费视频| 狠狠婷婷综合久久久久久88av| 久久久精品94久久精品| 欧美国产精品va在线观看不卡| 亚洲欧美精品综合一区二区三区 | 在线观看免费视频网站a站| 亚洲精品日韩在线中文字幕| 亚洲精品,欧美精品| av一本久久久久| 亚洲五月色婷婷综合| 日韩视频在线欧美| 美女大奶头黄色视频| 有码 亚洲区| 亚洲国产最新在线播放| 中文字幕制服av| 欧美激情极品国产一区二区三区| 国产黄色免费在线视频| 国产一区二区 视频在线| 丝袜在线中文字幕| 亚洲av日韩在线播放| 一二三四中文在线观看免费高清| 热99久久久久精品小说推荐| 成年女人毛片免费观看观看9 | 亚洲国产欧美在线一区| 伊人久久大香线蕉亚洲五| 男女边摸边吃奶| 一本久久精品| 黄色一级大片看看| 久久久久人妻精品一区果冻| 老熟女久久久| 99香蕉大伊视频| 一级黄片播放器| 中文字幕人妻丝袜制服| 看免费av毛片| 成年动漫av网址| 成人国产av品久久久| 亚洲欧美日韩另类电影网站| 亚洲av日韩在线播放| 精品卡一卡二卡四卡免费| 人人妻人人爽人人添夜夜欢视频| 97在线视频观看| 欧美精品高潮呻吟av久久| 26uuu在线亚洲综合色| 麻豆精品久久久久久蜜桃| 男女下面插进去视频免费观看| 国产免费一区二区三区四区乱码| 在线天堂中文资源库| 国产亚洲最大av| 一级爰片在线观看| 色婷婷av一区二区三区视频| 老汉色∧v一级毛片| 麻豆av在线久日| 热99国产精品久久久久久7| 国产成人精品在线电影| 日日爽夜夜爽网站| 一本一本久久a久久精品综合妖精 国产伦在线观看视频一区 | 国产精品蜜桃在线观看| 亚洲精品,欧美精品| 母亲3免费完整高清在线观看 | 不卡视频在线观看欧美| 国产精品一区二区在线不卡| 精品一品国产午夜福利视频| 大片电影免费在线观看免费| av在线老鸭窝| 中国三级夫妇交换| 亚洲伊人色综图| 国产熟女午夜一区二区三区| 久久久精品区二区三区| 汤姆久久久久久久影院中文字幕| 国产精品99久久99久久久不卡 | 桃花免费在线播放| av线在线观看网站| 精品国产一区二区久久| 国产爽快片一区二区三区| 欧美精品一区二区免费开放| 天堂俺去俺来也www色官网| av网站免费在线观看视频| 亚洲精品国产av成人精品| 国产一区二区激情短视频 | 美女脱内裤让男人舔精品视频| 黄色毛片三级朝国网站| 欧美激情极品国产一区二区三区| 免费av中文字幕在线| 男人添女人高潮全过程视频| 欧美精品国产亚洲| 亚洲第一av免费看| 在线观看三级黄色| 少妇精品久久久久久久| 亚洲一级一片aⅴ在线观看| 99久久人妻综合| 久久精品久久久久久噜噜老黄| 亚洲精品中文字幕在线视频| 国产一区二区三区av在线| 日韩中文字幕欧美一区二区 | 最近最新中文字幕大全免费视频 | 嫩草影院入口| 人人妻人人澡人人爽人人夜夜| 国精品久久久久久国模美| 亚洲在久久综合| 国产精品女同一区二区软件| 亚洲成av片中文字幕在线观看 | 男人爽女人下面视频在线观看| 国产有黄有色有爽视频| 中文字幕精品免费在线观看视频| 免费观看av网站的网址| 亚洲四区av| av.在线天堂| 一本久久精品| 成年美女黄网站色视频大全免费| 日本欧美国产在线视频| 国产成人精品久久二区二区91 | 精品国产超薄肉色丝袜足j| 麻豆av在线久日| 亚洲欧美精品综合一区二区三区 | 国产精品久久久久成人av| 精品国产露脸久久av麻豆| 一区二区三区四区激情视频| 成人亚洲精品一区在线观看| 咕卡用的链子| 亚洲av电影在线进入| 亚洲国产欧美网| 亚洲人成77777在线视频| 精品卡一卡二卡四卡免费| 88av欧美| 久久草成人影院| 欧美日韩亚洲国产一区二区在线观看| 精品日产1卡2卡| 成人特级黄色片久久久久久久| 久久久水蜜桃国产精品网| 欧美中文日本在线观看视频| 妹子高潮喷水视频| 久久中文字幕一级| 久久久久久久久免费视频了| 午夜影院日韩av| 久久精品亚洲av国产电影网| 黑人操中国人逼视频| 午夜福利一区二区在线看| 久久这里只有精品19| 黑人巨大精品欧美一区二区mp4| 嫩草影院精品99| 91大片在线观看| 97碰自拍视频| 久久精品91无色码中文字幕| 精品高清国产在线一区| 久久精品国产清高在天天线| 欧美中文日本在线观看视频| 久久久久久人人人人人| 老鸭窝网址在线观看| 麻豆一二三区av精品| 五月开心婷婷网| 99国产精品99久久久久| 少妇裸体淫交视频免费看高清 | 久久天堂一区二区三区四区| 精品国产乱子伦一区二区三区| 成年人免费黄色播放视频| 久久国产亚洲av麻豆专区| 一个人免费在线观看的高清视频| 高清欧美精品videossex| 日日干狠狠操夜夜爽| 美女国产高潮福利片在线看| 18禁裸乳无遮挡免费网站照片 | 99精品在免费线老司机午夜| 天天添夜夜摸| 色婷婷久久久亚洲欧美| 国产黄色免费在线视频| 亚洲成人久久性| 黄色片一级片一级黄色片| 日韩精品青青久久久久久| 精品久久久久久电影网| 久久国产精品男人的天堂亚洲| 欧洲精品卡2卡3卡4卡5卡区| 国产成年人精品一区二区 | 高清黄色对白视频在线免费看| 国产精品国产高清国产av| 国产精品久久视频播放| 麻豆久久精品国产亚洲av | 欧美黑人精品巨大| 最近最新中文字幕大全电影3 | 伊人久久大香线蕉亚洲五| 亚洲成a人片在线一区二区| 在线观看一区二区三区激情| 丰满人妻熟妇乱又伦精品不卡| 在线免费观看的www视频| 脱女人内裤的视频| 叶爱在线成人免费视频播放| 老熟妇乱子伦视频在线观看| 亚洲精品中文字幕在线视频| 国产成人影院久久av| 身体一侧抽搐| 国产极品粉嫩免费观看在线| 亚洲自拍偷在线| 亚洲免费av在线视频| 久久狼人影院| 亚洲情色 制服丝袜| 国产精品九九99| 黑人操中国人逼视频| 久久精品国产亚洲av高清一级| 亚洲欧美精品综合一区二区三区| 真人一进一出gif抽搐免费| ponron亚洲| 亚洲免费av在线视频| 男人舔女人下体高潮全视频| 黄片播放在线免费| 99热只有精品国产| 欧美大码av| 亚洲成人国产一区在线观看| 日日夜夜操网爽| 一二三四社区在线视频社区8| 高清在线国产一区| 在线免费观看的www视频| 国产精品野战在线观看 | 精品少妇一区二区三区视频日本电影| 99香蕉大伊视频| 午夜影院日韩av| 热99re8久久精品国产| 涩涩av久久男人的天堂| 亚洲男人的天堂狠狠| 亚洲男人天堂网一区| 一区二区三区国产精品乱码| 亚洲一码二码三码区别大吗| 亚洲精品在线美女| 国产精品秋霞免费鲁丝片| 亚洲第一av免费看| 久久久久久久久免费视频了| 黑丝袜美女国产一区| 曰老女人黄片| 久久久国产成人免费| 久久人人精品亚洲av| 欧美中文综合在线视频| 亚洲精品美女久久av网站| 搡老熟女国产l中国老女人| 精品国产乱码久久久久久男人| 欧美精品亚洲一区二区| 亚洲一卡2卡3卡4卡5卡精品中文| 在线视频色国产色| 最新美女视频免费是黄的| 亚洲中文av在线| 老司机深夜福利视频在线观看| 亚洲一区二区三区欧美精品| 亚洲 国产 在线| 婷婷丁香在线五月| 国产精品一区二区三区四区久久 | 久久精品国产99精品国产亚洲性色 | 免费在线观看视频国产中文字幕亚洲| 国产精品久久久久久人妻精品电影| 亚洲中文字幕日韩| 日本wwww免费看| 一区福利在线观看| 人妻丰满熟妇av一区二区三区| 国产av精品麻豆| 一级a爱视频在线免费观看| 亚洲人成电影免费在线| 亚洲国产看品久久| 脱女人内裤的视频| 久久精品国产亚洲av高清一级| 黄网站色视频无遮挡免费观看| 精品一区二区三区四区五区乱码| 男女做爰动态图高潮gif福利片 | 又黄又爽又免费观看的视频| tocl精华| 国产又爽黄色视频| 人人澡人人妻人| 国产精品自产拍在线观看55亚洲| 少妇 在线观看| 视频区图区小说| avwww免费| 99精品在免费线老司机午夜| 高清黄色对白视频在线免费看| 不卡一级毛片| 中出人妻视频一区二区| 亚洲熟妇中文字幕五十中出 | 国产午夜精品久久久久久| 国产高清videossex| 韩国av一区二区三区四区| 久久香蕉国产精品| 一级毛片女人18水好多| 国产精品一区二区三区四区久久 | 黄色a级毛片大全视频| 国产欧美日韩一区二区三| 久久影院123| 欧美日本中文国产一区发布| 91精品国产国语对白视频| 久久久水蜜桃国产精品网| 一级毛片女人18水好多| 天堂√8在线中文| 99精品在免费线老司机午夜| 久久精品国产亚洲av香蕉五月| 97超级碰碰碰精品色视频在线观看| 老司机靠b影院| 日本撒尿小便嘘嘘汇集6| 伊人久久大香线蕉亚洲五| 久久这里只有精品19| 亚洲成人免费av在线播放| 首页视频小说图片口味搜索| 午夜免费成人在线视频| 国产精品秋霞免费鲁丝片| 99久久人妻综合| 亚洲精品国产一区二区精华液| 国产黄a三级三级三级人| a级毛片黄视频| 亚洲人成电影免费在线| 日韩欧美一区视频在线观看| 热re99久久国产66热| 视频在线观看一区二区三区| 99久久人妻综合| 91大片在线观看| 欧美激情高清一区二区三区| 身体一侧抽搐| 欧美另类亚洲清纯唯美| av有码第一页| 亚洲欧美日韩另类电影网站| 国产97色在线日韩免费| 国产精品一区二区三区四区久久 | 成人亚洲精品av一区二区 | 色老头精品视频在线观看| 在线观看免费午夜福利视频| 两个人免费观看高清视频| 国产亚洲精品综合一区在线观看 | 男女午夜视频在线观看| 黄片播放在线免费| 亚洲av熟女| 好男人电影高清在线观看| 久久久久精品国产欧美久久久| 国产av精品麻豆| 精品一区二区三区视频在线观看免费 | 色婷婷av一区二区三区视频| 免费少妇av软件| 国产片内射在线| 国产精品九九99| 欧美人与性动交α欧美软件| 香蕉国产在线看| 男人舔女人下体高潮全视频| 看黄色毛片网站| 嫁个100分男人电影在线观看| 在线视频色国产色| 亚洲精品av麻豆狂野| 夜夜爽天天搞| 久久欧美精品欧美久久欧美| 欧美久久黑人一区二区| 日本a在线网址| 好男人电影高清在线观看| 久久影院123| 亚洲国产精品一区二区三区在线| 久久人人97超碰香蕉20202| 亚洲欧洲精品一区二区精品久久久| 99精国产麻豆久久婷婷| 老汉色∧v一级毛片| 多毛熟女@视频| 欧美日韩亚洲综合一区二区三区_| 欧美亚洲日本最大视频资源| 日本三级黄在线观看| 嫩草影院精品99| 身体一侧抽搐| 黑人猛操日本美女一级片| 中文字幕另类日韩欧美亚洲嫩草| 黄色 视频免费看| 男女高潮啪啪啪动态图| 国产有黄有色有爽视频| 欧美日韩亚洲高清精品| 高清在线国产一区| 天堂中文最新版在线下载| 伊人久久大香线蕉亚洲五| 久久国产精品人妻蜜桃| 99国产精品一区二区蜜桃av| 99国产极品粉嫩在线观看| 怎么达到女性高潮| 1024视频免费在线观看| 亚洲美女黄片视频| 黄色毛片三级朝国网站| 亚洲五月婷婷丁香| 日本 av在线| 一本大道久久a久久精品|