• <tr id="yyy80"></tr>
  • <sup id="yyy80"></sup>
  • <tfoot id="yyy80"><noscript id="yyy80"></noscript></tfoot>
  • 99热精品在线国产_美女午夜性视频免费_国产精品国产高清国产av_av欧美777_自拍偷自拍亚洲精品老妇_亚洲熟女精品中文字幕_www日本黄色视频网_国产精品野战在线观看 ?

    Significance of Belgian Legislation on the Protection of Underwater Cultural Heritage as a Reference to the Amendment of China's Pertinent Regulations

    2019-01-26 18:59:05LINZhen
    中華海洋法學(xué)評論 2019年1期
    關(guān)鍵詞:國家文物局文化遺產(chǎn)中心

    LIN Zhen

    Abstract: Regulation of the People’s Republic of China Concerning the Administration of the Work for the Protection of Underwater Cultural Relics(hereinafter referred to as the “Regulation”) is currently being amended.Meanwhile, China is considering acceding to the UNESCO Convention on the Protection of Underwater Cultural Heritage (hereinafter referred to as the“Convention”). Amendments to the Regulation should therefore take the provisions under the Convention into account so as to conform to the spirit of the Convention as far as possible. There are 60 States Parties to the Convention to date. Among them, Belgium is one of the few States that have already reenacted relevant laws in accordance with the Convention upon accession. Although China has not yet joined the Convention, the influence that its provisions might have on the nation’s domestic legislation should be adequately accounted for when the Regulation is being amended. In this regard, it is important that China understand the adjustments that Belgium and other States Parties have made to their domestic legislations as well as the rationale of such adjustments.

    Key Words: Legislation of China; Underwater cultural heritage; Legislation of Belgium

    Following the amendment of the Law of the People’s Republic of China on the Protection of Cultural Relics, the Regulation of the People’s Republic of China Concerning the Administration of the Work for the Protection of Underwater Cultural Relics (hereinafter referred to as the “Regulation”) is also being revised.The Exposure Draft on the Revised Regulation was released on 11 February 2018.At the same time, China is considering acceding to the UNESCO Convention on the Protection of Underwater Cultural Heritage (hereinafter referred to as the“Convention”). In this perspective, amendments to the Regulation should therefore take the provisions under the Convention into account so as to conform to the spirit of the Convention to the maximum extent. In fact, after the adoption of the Convention, many countries, even those who have not yet joined, have taken pertinent provisions under the Convention into account when revising their relevant legislation.1For example, Malaysia’s National Heritage Act 2005 was greatly affected by the UNESCO Convention on the Protection of Underwater Cultural Heritage 2001 (hereinafter referred to as the “Convention”). National Heritage Act 2005, at http://www.hbp.usm.my/conservation/laws/nationalheritageact.htm, 30 September 2018.

    To date, there are 60 States Parties to the Convention, but not all of them have made amendment to relevant domestic legislation accordingly. Although they have already acceded to the Convention, some States Parties have not yet amended relevant domestic laws so as to be fully in conformity with the provisions under the Convention. Belgium is one of the few countries that have reenacted relevant national laws in accordance with the Convention. Belgium acceded to the Convention on 5 August 2013. Three months later, the Convention entered into force for Belgium, which then decided to abolish its 2007 Law on the Discovery and Protection of Shipwrecks2Law on the Discovery and Protection of Shipwrecks, the Kingdom of Belgium, at http://www.ejustice.just.fgov.be/cgi_loi/loi_a.pl?imgcn.y=4&sql=dd+=+date%272007-04-09%27+and+nm+contains+%272007014194%27&language=fr&rech=&tri=dd+as+rank&numero=1&table_name=LOI&caller=image_a1&row_id=1&cn=2007040951&fromtab=loi&imgcn.x=61&DETAIL=2007040951/F&nm=2007014194&la=F&pdf_page=7&pdf_file=http://www.ejustice.just.fgov.be/mopdf/2007/06/21_1.pdf, 30 September 2018. (in French)and to draft a new law to implement the Convention.3At https://www.lachambre.be/kvvcr/pdf_sections/newsletter/53-131-plenum-laws15F.pdf,30 September 2018. (in French)The resultant Draft Law on the Protection of the Underwater Cultural Heritage was approved by the House and Senate of Belgium on 20 March, and 27 March 2014, respectively.4At http://www.lachambre.be/kvvcr/showpage.cfm?section=/flwb&language=fr&cfm=/site/wwwcfm/flwb/flwbn.cfm?legislat=53&dossierID=3397, 30 September 2018. (in French)On 18 April of the same year, the Law on the Protection of the Underwater Cultural Heritage (hereinafter referred to as the “2014 Law”)was adopted by the Belgian government.5Law on the Protection of the Underwater Cultural Heritage (hereinafter referred to as the “2014 Law”), at http://www.unesco.org/culture/natlaws/media/pdf/belgium/belg_loipatsub14_frorof, 30 September 2018. (in French)

    China has not yet joined the Convention. Nonetheless, it should consider the impact that the Convention will have on itself in the future. In this regard, a thorough examination of the adjustments that States Parties have made to their domestic legislation after acceding to the Convention, as well as the rationales underpinning such adjustments, will provide some guidance on how China can best amend the Regulation.

    I. Major Provisions of the 2014 Law of Belgium

    Belgium’s underwater cultural heritage (hereinafter referred to as “UCH”)is mainly located in the North Sea. Although the Belgian coastline is relatively short, Belgium possesses a considerable number of underwater cultural relics near its shore, including about 280 shipwrecks lying in its territorial sea.6Draft Law on the Protection of Underwater Cultural Heritage, Belgian House of Representatives, at http://www.lachambre.be/FLWB/PDF/53/3397/53K3397001.pdf, 30 September 2018. (in French)Historically,Antwerp and Ostend were two important international seaports. The Flanders Region was a major battlefield in the First and Second World Wars. For instance,the Zeebrugge Raid of the First World War took place in this region. As a result of these historical events, the waters of Belgium contain many ancient wrecked merchant freighters such as the ships of the Dutch East India Company7Ministerial Order on the Protection of the Wreck of the Wooden Vessel in Front of the Ostend Coast as Underwater Cultural Heritage, at http://www.etaamb.be/fr/arreteministeriel-du-30-septembre-2014_n2014014750.html, 30 September 2018; Ministerial Order on the Protection of the Wreck Site on the Buiten Ratel Sandbank as Underwater Cultural Heritage, at http://www.etaamb.be/fr/arrete-ministeriel-du-12-septembre-2016_n2016014316.html, 30 September 2018; Ministerial Order on the Protection of the Wreck of ‘t Vliegent Hart as Underwater Cultural Heritage, at http://www.etaamb.be/fr/arreteministeriel-du-12-septembre-2016_n2016014321.html, 30 September 2018. (in French)as well as a notable number of early and mid-twentieth century warships.8Ministerial Order on the Protection of the Wreck of the HMS Brilliant as Underwater Cultural Heritage, at http://www.etaamb.be/fr/arrete-ministeriel-du-12-septembre-2016_n2016014317.html, 30 September 2018; Ministerial Order on the Protection of the Wreck of the HMS Wakeful as Underwater Cultural Heritage, at http://www.etaamb.be/fr/arreteministeriel-du-13-mai-2014_n2014014608.html, 30 September 2018; Ministerial Order on the Recognition of Three Sunken Ships as Underwater Cultural Heritage, at http://www.ejustice.just.fgov.be/cgi/article_body.pl?language=fr&caller=summary&pub_date=18-04-11&numac=2018011377, 30 September 2018. (in French)Belgium has demonstrated an emphasis on the importance of the protection of its UCH and,accordingly, has passed a series of laws and regulations to enhance it, including the aforesaid 2014 Law. This section will introduce the major provisions of the 2014 Law with regard to UCH’s definition, jurisdiction, ownership, warships and other State vessels, and international cooperation. Also, it will attempt to expose the rationales behind these provisions.

    A. Definitions

    Belgian government has changed considerably in its understanding of the term UCH. This shift can be easily noticed by comparing the terms employed by the 2007 Law on the Discovery and Protection of Shipwrecks and the 2014 Law respectively. The 2007 Law defined “Protected Shipwrecks” as “all the wrecks and objects with historical or archaeological value in its territorial sea”.9Law on the Discovery and Protection of Shipwrecks, the Kingdom of Belgium, Art. 16. (in French)This definition is narrower than the currently-used concept of “cultural heritage” in that it only mentions the protection of cultural relics themselves, putting the surrounding environment at a disadvantage, which however is equally of archaeological value.

    The definition of UCH in the 2014 Law is generally in conformity with the provisions of the Convention.10Art. 2 of the 2014 Law provides that: For the purposes of the application and execution of the present Law, “discoveries” mean any discovery of traces of human existence having a cultural, historical or archaeological character which have been partially or totally under water, periodically or continuously, such as: (a) sites, structures, buildings, artefacts and human remains, together with their archaeological and natural context; (b) vessels,aircraft, other vehicles or any part thereof, their cargo or other contents, together with their archaeological and natural context; and (c) objects of prehistoric character. If the person who has discovered any item listed above has good reason to believe that it is underwater cultural heritage and has not yet registered it in accordance with Article 7, such an item could be deemed as a “discovery” under the Law.The wording is basically consistent with Article 1(1)(a) of the Convention. However, it is noteworthy that Article 2 of the 2014 Law contains no provision concerning the criterion of 100 years under the Convention.11In accordance with the Convention, “underwater cultural heritage” means all traces of human existence having a cultural, historical or archaeological character which have been partially or totally under water, periodically or continuously, for at least one hundred years such as - (a) sites, structures, buildings, artefacts and human remains, together with their archaeological and natural context; (b) vessels, aircraft, other vehicles or any part thereof,their cargo or other contents, together with their archaeological and natural context; and(c) objects of prehistoric character. A careful comparison between the 2014 Law and the Convention tells that, the definition of UCH under Article 3 of the Law is very similar to the one under the Convention, with the sole difference lying in the time criterion of 100 years.According to Article 3 of the 2014 Law, the 100-year criterion applies only to all traces of human activities having a cultural, historical or archaeological character that are found in the exclusive economic zone (EEZ) or on the continental shelf of Belgium. No such standard or requirement has been made under the 2014 Law concerning the UCH found within its territorial sea. Consequently, the traces which are discovered in its territorial waters do not have to be under water for at least 100 years to be classified as UCH.

    The rationale behind Article 3 of the 2014 Law could be found in Bill No.3397 passed by the Belgian House of Representatives.12At https://www.lachambre.be/kvvcr/pdf_sections/newsletter/53-131-plenum-laws15F.pdf,30 September 2018. (in French)A State enjoys sovereignty over its territorial sea. Any State has thus the right to enact laws to manage the UCH situated within its territorial sea. Accordingly, Belgium has the right to establish higher standards to enhance the protection of the UCH lying in its internal waters and territorial sea. In both sea areas, the UCH falling under the protection scope of the 2014 Law of Belgium is much more than those covered by the Convention, which is however consistent with the purpose of the Convention,i.e., to provide maximum protection to UCH. As of the traces found in the EEZ or on the continental shelf of Belgium, only those which have been submerged under water for not less than 100 years are deemed as UCH protected by the 2014 Law. However, considering that it does not have sovereignty over its EEZ or on its continental shelf, the Government of Belgium has reviewed its domestic laws so as not to conflict with existing international rules and domestic laws of other countries. In this regard, when drafting the 2014 Law, it also duly considered the potential impact that the provisions on the protection of UCH in the aforesaid areas would have on the interest of the international community.

    B. Jurisdiction

    The 2014 Law, with regard to the scope of its application, states that:

    The present law shall apply to: 1. articles discovered within the limits of the territorial sea of Belgium; 2. articles discovered in Belgium’s exclusive economic zone or on its continental shelf which have been submerged under water for not less than 100 years.

    As this provision shows, the 2014 Law is applicable to not only the UCH found in the territorial sea of Belgium but also to that found in its EEZ or on its continental shelf. However, with regard to the UCH discovered in its EEZ or on its continental shelf, the Law can only be applied to that UCH having been under water for at least 100 years. In contrast, the 2007 Law on the Discovery and Protection of Shipwrecks only applies to the shipwrecks found in the territorial waters of Belgium.13Law on the Discovery and Protection of Shipwrecks, the Kingdom of Belgium, Art. 2.Therefore, as compared with the 2007 Law, the 2014 Law has extended the jurisdiction of the Belgian government.

    C. Ownership

    The Convention is silent on the question of who shall have the ownership over a piece of UCH. The 2014 Law of Belgium, instead, contains detailed provisions on the matter. Article 10 of the 2014 Law articulates that Belgium may claim ownership over any UCH that is found in its territorial waters, EEZ or on its continental shelf, without prejudice to the right of the original owner to claim ownership upon proof of identity.14The 2014 Law, Art. 10.Particularly, the ownership of warships and other State vessels would be accorded to their flag States.

    D. Warships and Other State Vessels

    Provisions laid down in Article 6(2), paragraph 2 of the 2014 Law are rather similar to those of the Convention. These provisions ensure that ownership over warships and other State vessels will be duly accorded to their flag States.Accordingly, the provisions oblige Belgium to conduct consultations with flag States Parties on the protection of such wrecks while reserving the right to take all the necessary measures to prevent any immediate danger, including looting,before consulting the flag States.15The 2014 Law, Art. 6(2), para 2.This provision of the 2014 Law is undoubtedly in conformity with Articles 7 and 10 of the Convention.16Art. 7(3) of the Convention provides: within their archipelagic waters and territorial sea,in the exercise of their sovereignty and in recognition of general practice among States,States Parties, with a view to cooperating on the best methods of protecting State vessels and aircraft, should inform the flag State Party to this Convention and, if applicable, other States with a verifiable link, especially a cultural, historical or archaeological link, with respect to the discovery of such identifiable State vessels and aircraft. And Art. 10(4) of the Convention states: without prejudice to the duty of all States Parties to protect underwater cultural heritage by way of all practicable measures taken in accordance with international law to prevent immediate danger to the underwater cultural heritage, including looting,the Coordinating State may take all practicable measures, and/or issue any necessary authorizations in conformity with this Convention and, if necessary prior to consultations,to prevent any immediate danger to the underwater cultural heritage, whether arising from human activities or any other cause, including looting. In taking such measures assistance may be requested from other States Parties.In comparison with previous legislation of Belgium,17Law on the Discovery and Protection of Shipwrecks, Art. 7(2), para. 2, stipulates that, for a warship or a State vessel which at the time of sinking was used solely for government but not commercial purposes, the official in charge may allow salvage of such wrecks only after obtaining a special authorization directly from its flag State.the jurisdiction of Belgium, as a coastal State,has obviously been expanded to some extent in this regard.

    E. International Cooperation

    Article 8(1), paragraph 3 of the 2014 Law states that with respect to the UCH found within the EEZ or on the continental shelf of Belgium, the official in charge of UCH protection may, if necessary, consult the State that has made a declaration to Belgium in accordance with Article 9(5) of the Convention. And the Convention Article 9(5) provides:

    Any State Party may declare to the State Party in whose exclusive economic zone or on whose continental shelf the underwater cultural heritage is located its interest in being consulted on how to ensure the effective protection of that underwater cultural heritage. Such declaration shall be based on a verifiable link, especially a cultural, historical or archaeological link, to the underwater cultural heritage concerned.

    As these passages demonstrated, the relevant provisions of the 2014 Law are highly consistent with the principle of international cooperation as encouraged by UNCLOS Article 30318United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea, Art. 303(1), reads: States have the duty to protect objects of an archaeological and historical nature found at sea and shall cooperate for this purpose.and the Convention.

    In general, the 2014 Law demonstrates the commitment of the Belgian government to fulfilling its treaty obligations as a State Party to the Convention.In addition to the abovementioned Article 8(1), Belgium has established further provisions with the objective of abiding by the fundamental principles of the Convention, including the preservation in situ of UCH and prohibition of commercial exploitation.19Art. 6(1) of the 2014 Law provides that no excavation shall be carried out until permission is obtained from the official in charge of UCH protection. Article 15 prohibits the sale and possession of any UCH inconsistent with this law. Article 16 further provides that no Belgian vessel shall engage in any exploration or excavation of UCH in violation of the Convention. Article 8(3) also states that the protection of underwater cultural heritage through in situ preservation shall be considered as the first option. Where in situ preservation is impossible, activities directed at UCH shall be carried out following the provisions of the Annex to the Convention.From this perspective, it can be concluded that the law adopted by the Belgian government with regard to the protection of its UCH has been as truthful to the spirit of the Convention as practical in terms of adjusting some of its provisions to the country’s specific necessities, as illustrated by the 2014 Law’s deliberation on the matter of jurisdiction.

    II. Significance of the 2014 Law as a Reference to the Amendment of the Regulation of China

    China has a long history. It possesses rich cultural heritage, which includes ancient shipwrecks, cities, bridges, ports, hydrological stone carvings, modern warships and other submerged relics. Although the protection of UCH started late in China, it has developed rather rapidly into a system led by the central government.China has managed to conduct several major excavations by deploying underwater archaeology related resources with the assistance of local agencies. To date, this system has accomplished a series of significant achievements, most notably the extension of its operating area to the distant waters.20At http://www.uch-china.org/inchina.aspx, 15 July 2018. (in Chinese)Today, in line with the needs related to the construction of the “Twenty-First Century Maritime Silk Road”,China has established international cooperation with several States concerning UCH protection, which include joint archaeological excavations with Kenya and Saudi Arabia in their waters respectively.21At http://www.xinhuanet.com/world/2018-12/30/c_1123928294.htm, http://www.chnmuseum.cn/(S(2d4uwh55uyjqbg45tpah3ea1))/Default.aspx?TabId=1312&InfoID=9005 3&frtid=1243&AspxAutoDetectCookieSupport=1, 15 July 2018. (in Chinese)In terms of legislation, China is one of the few East Asian States which have enacted specific domestic laws for UCH protection. For example, the Regulation was adopted in 1989 by the Chinese government and has played an important role till most recently.

    On 11 February 2018, in order to meet the current needs to protect underwater cultural relics, the National Cultural Heritage Administration of China released the Exposure Draft of Revised Regulation of the People’s Republic of China Concerning the Administration of the Work for the Protection of Underwater Cultural Relics (hereinafter referred to as the “Exposure Draft”).22Exposure Draft on the Revised Regulation of the People’s Republic of China Concerning the Administration of the Work for the Protection of Underwater Cultural Relics (hereinafter“Exposure Draft”), at http://www.sach.gov.cn/module/download/downfile.jsp?classid=0&fil ename=1802112038231995622.docx, 15 July 2018. (in Chinese)According to the notes penned by the National Cultural Heritage Administration, the amendments envisioned by the Exposure Draft have three main purposes: first, to revise the Regulation so that it matches with the changes made to the Law of the People’s Republic of China on Protection of Cultural Relics (hereinafter referred to as the “Law on Protection of Cultural Relics”); second, to cater to the needs of the new operations concerning the protection of underwater cultural relics; third, to improve the feasibility of the provisions under the Regulation.23Revision Explanations with Regards to the Exposure Draft, at http://www.sach.gov.cn/module/download/downfile.jsp?classid=0&filename=1802112038457578546.docx, 15 July 2018. (in Chinese)The revisions have also been influenced by the spirit and fundamental principles of the Convention.24Revision Explanations with Regards to the Exposure Draft, at http://www.sach.gov.cn/module/download/downfile.jsp?classid=0&filename=1802112038457578546.docx, 15 July 2018. (in Chinese)However, the Exposure Draft is still being discussed. Therefore, this section will explore the possible directions that the Exposure Draft might take by using the relevant Belgian legislation as a point of reference. This will be done by bearing in mind that, Belgium is a State Party to the Convention, whereas China has not yet acceded to the Convention. However, since the amendment to the Regulation has also the unstated purpose of respecting the standards established by the relevant international law, China cannot but take the provisions of the Convention into account so as to be well prepared for its accession. From this point of view, the amendment to the Regulation needs to be both forward-looking and consistent with the basic principles of the Convention while, at the same time, preserving some flexibility in the areas which have not yet been clearly specified in the Convention.Therefore, the flexible enforcement of the Convention by the Belgian government might provide some important guidance to China.

    A. Terms and Definitions

    As it can be shown from the legislative changes adopted by Belgium and other States, the concept of UCH is now increasingly used to replace old terms such as“underwater cultural relics”, “shipwrecks” and “sunken objects”. According to its definition in the Convention, UCH encompasses much more than those old terms.In this perspective, to align the country with what is now a common trend in the international community, China’s legislators could replace the conceptual term of“underwater cultural relics” with that of “underwater cultural heritage”. Of course,the prerequisite for doing so is to make adjustments to the Law on Protection of Cultural Relics and, accordingly, use the term “cultural heritage” instead of “cultural relics”. As a matter of fact, two Chinese organizations in charge of UCH protection,namely the National Cultural Heritage Administration (國家文物局) and the National Center of Underwater Cultural Heritage (水下文化遺產(chǎn)保護中心)have already used the term “cultural heritage”, instead of “cultural relics” in their English names. Otherwise, the term “cultural relics” could be retained but include certain components of the concept of cultural heritage such as the archaeological and natural context of the heritage, which are generally excluded from what is understood to be a “physical object”. Ideally, this adjustment should occur in the Law on Protection of Cultural Relics first.

    With respect to the definition of the underwater cultural relics, Article 2 of the Regulation states:

    The term “underwater cultural relics” referred to in the Regulation means any human cultural heritage having historical, artistic and scientific values that remain in the following waters:

    (1) all the cultural relics of Chinese origin, of unidentifiable origin, or of foreign origin that remain in Chinese internal or territorial waters;

    (2) cultural relics that are of Chinese origin or of unidentifiable origin that remain in sea areas outside the Chinese territorial waters but under Chinese jurisdiction according to Chinese laws;

    (3) cultural relics of Chinese origin that remain in the sea areas of any foreign State other than its internal and territorial waters, or in the high seas.

    The provisions in the preceding paragraphs shall not cover objects that have remained underwater since 1911 but have nothing to do with important historical events, revolutionary movements or renowned personages.

    The Exposure Draft did not make any changes to the abovementioned Article 2. As for the reasons, the National Cultural Heritage Administration explained that:“it is important to note that as China has not yet acceded to the Convention, no amendments have been made to the content of Articles 2 and 3 with regard to the scope of and the jurisdiction over underwater cultural relics.”25Revision Explanations with Regards to the Exposure Draft, at http://www.sach.gov.cn/module/download/downfile.jsp?classid=0&filename=1802112038457578546.docx, 15 July 2018. (in Chinese)This seems to admit the existence of a certain gap between China’s legislation and the Convention in the determination of the scope of cultural relics. All objects submerged after 1911 and before 1918 are protected by the Convention but not necessarily by the Regulation.It seems that the 100-year-criterion under the Convention was established without strict reasoning. In contrast, the critical date of 1911 under the Regulation was determined after careful consideration. It is said that this criterion was made for the purpose of excluding foreign warships that sank in China’s waters after 1911.26Cross-Strait Forum on Laws, Policies and Practices Relating to Underwater Cultural Heritage 2018, Keelung, 20-21 June 2018.However, as far as legislative means are concerned, it is entirely possible to use a separate article to make specific arrangements for such vessels (see Subsection D of this part for details).

    After accession to the Convention, China can also use the Belgian legislation as a point of reference and, accordingly, set a limit of 100 years for the definition of UCH that is found in its EEZ or on its continental shelf while leaving the time criteria open ended with regard to the UCH discovered in its territorial sea. As a matter of fact, there is no need to artificially set any time limit for the UCH that is found in the territorial waters of a State, since its cultural and archaeological value should be the foremost criterion to determine whether it is worthy of protection.Conversely, for the UCH that is found in the EEZ and on the continental shelf,which does not fall within the territory of a given State, applicable international treaties should be considered so as to avoid potential conflicts. Lastly, since under the current Regulation, the article defining the term of underwater cultural relics includes both definition and application scope, it would be recommendable that the aforesaid article be divided into two articles, with one dedicated to definition, and the other to application scope.

    B. Jurisdiction

    Jurisdiction of States has always been a focus during discussions on legislative amendment. Article 3 of the current Regulation stipulates:

    The underwater cultural relics stipulated in Article 2(1)&(2) belong to the State (China), and the State exercises jurisdiction over them; the State shall have the right to identify the owner of the underwater cultural relics specified in Article 2(3).

    As mentioned above, on the ground that China has not yet joined the Convention, the Exposure Draft contains no amendment to the content of Articles 2 and 3 concerning the jurisdiction over underwater cultural relics. So, do the current provisions on jurisdiction in the Regulation of China conflict with the Convention?

    According to the UNCLOS, the rights of coastal States over their EEZ and continental shelf are limited to sovereign rights and corresponding jurisdiction over natural resources and, technically speaking, do not extend to underwater cultural heritage. The Convention designed a very complex mechanism of “Coordinating State” to address the issue of jurisdiction over UCH found in the EEZ or on the continental shelf of a State.27Art. 10(3) of the Convention reads: where there is a discovery of underwater cultural heritage or it is intended that activity shall be directed at underwater cultural heritage in a State Party’s exclusive economic zone or on its continental shelf, that State Party shall: (a) consult all other States Parties which have declared an interest under Article 9,paragraph 5, on how best to protect the underwater cultural heritage; (b) coordinate such consultations as “Coordinating State”, unless it expressly declares that it does not wish to do so, in which case the States Parties which have declared an interest under Article 9, paragraph 5, shall appoint a Coordinating State. And its Art. 10(4) states: without prejudice to the duty of all States Parties to protect underwater cultural heritage by way of all practicable measures taken in accordance with international law to prevent immediate danger to the underwater cultural heritage, including looting, the Coordinating State may take all practicable measures, and/or issue any necessary authorizations in conformity with this Convention and, if necessary prior to consultations, to prevent any immediate danger to the underwater cultural heritage, whether arising from human activities or any other cause, including looting. In taking such measures assistance may be requested from other States Parties. In accordance with Art. 10(5), the Coordinating State: (a) shall implement measures of protection which have been agreed by the consulting States, which include the Coordinating State, unless the consulting States, which include the Coordinating State,agree that another State Party shall implement those measures; (b) shall issue all necessary authorizations for such agreed measures in conformity with the Rules, unless the consulting States, which include the Coordinating State, agree that another State Party shall issue those authorizations; (c) may conduct any necessary preliminary research on the underwater cultural heritage and shall issue all necessary authorizations therefore, and shall promptly inform the Director-General of the results, who in turn will make such information promptly available to other States Parties. Art. 10(6) provides: in coordinating consultations, taking measures, conducting preliminary research and/or issuing authorizations pursuant to this Article, the Coordinating State shall act on behalf of the States Parties as a whole and not in its own interest. Any such action shall not in itself constitute a basis for the assertion of any preferential or jurisdictional rights not provided for in international law, including the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea.On the one hand, the Convention seems reluctant to admit the extension of the jurisdiction of coastal States. On the other hand, it has to rely on coastal States for the management of UCH lying in such sea areas. This has resulted in significant differences in the provisions of different States Parties with regard to their jurisdiction over UCH discovered in their EEZ or on their continental shelf. Belgium, which has a large number of UCH of foreign origin in its waters, has therefore adopted the approach of expanding its jurisdiction while also acknowledging other States’ claims of rights as States of origin. This approach makes international cooperation possible for the protection of UCH in the waters of Belgium.

    On the basis of different legal principles, China exercises jurisdiction over the underwater cultural relics of Chinese or unidentifiable origin that are found in its EEZ or on its continental shelf. In the first case, jurisdiction is legitimated by the right attached to being the State of origin. In the second, jurisdiction is legitimated on the ground that, as a coastal State, China is in the best position to provide maximum protection to these relics. As for the relics of Chinese origin that are found in the EEZ or on the continental shelf of other States, China’s claim of right to identify their owners stems from its right as the State of origin.

    However, to date China has never claimed any rights over any underwater cultural relics of Chinese origin that have been found in other States’ waters. This has been the case in that the Regulation’s provisions for such an operation are hardly implementable. To overcome this issue, legislators may consider extending China’s jurisdiction to all the UCH found in its EEZ or on its continental shelf but also, following the Belgian case, reserve for the State of origin the right to provide consultation. On the basis of the principle of reciprocity, legislators could also reserve the same right for China with respect to the UCH of Chinese origin that is discovered in the EEZ or continental shelf of other States. China has a long history of prosperous international maritime trade, thus it cannot be excluded that there might be a certain amount of UCH of foreign origin lying in China’s EEZ or on its continental shelf. Likewise, it is very likely that some more pieces of UCH of Chinese origin are located in the EEZ or continental shelf of other States. This double reservation, if adopted, would also serve the prospective needs of UCH protection under the “Belt and Road Initiative” of China.

    C. Ownership

    There is no specific provision on the issue of UCH ownership in the Convention. To put it differently, the Convention may intentionally leave it blank to guarantee States Parties’ right to amend their national laws according to their interpretation of the Convention. Following accession to the Convention, Belgium passed a law to claim that the UCH found in its territorial sea, EEZ or on its continental shelf belong to Belgium, demonstrating that this provision does not violate its obligations under the Convention.

    China’s current legislation merely provides that it claims ownership over the underwater cultural relics that are found in its territorial waters, as well as the relics of Chinese or unidentifiable origin which are located in its EEZ or on its continental shelf. Currently, the Exposure Draft has made no amendment to this provision, which does not conflict with the Convention and may therefore be retained even after accession to the Convention. However, the portion of Article 3 of the Regulation that concerns the right to identify the owner of the cultural relics that are of Chinese origin but located in the EEZ or on the continental shelf of other States needs to be further clarified. As mentioned above, China has never claimed ownership over the relics located in other States’ waters, thus this provision has never been implemented. In practice, this right to identify the owner differs from jurisdiction and ownership. This right is, in fact, closer to those enjoyable by the State of origin as defined in Articles 9 and 10 of the Convention.28Art. 9(5) of the Convention: any State Party may declare to the State Party in whose exclusive economic zone or on whose continental shelf the underwater cultural heritage is located its interest in being consulted on how to ensure the effective protection of that underwater cultural heritage. Such declaration shall be based on a verifiable link, especially a cultural, historical or archaeological link, to the underwater cultural heritage concerned.Art. 10(3) states that where there is a discovery of underwater cultural heritage or it is intended that activity shall be directed at underwater cultural heritage in a State Party’s exclusive economic zone or on its continental shelf, that State Party shall: (a) consult all other States Parties which have declared an interest under Article 9, paragraph 5, on how best to protect the underwater cultural heritage; (b) coordinate such consultations as“Coordinating State”, unless it expressly declares that it does not wish to do so, in which case the States Parties which have declared an interest under Article 9, paragraph 5, shall appoint a Coordinating State.Unlike natural resources, UCH comprises artificially produced objects. In light of this distinction,the rights of the States of origin, as creators of UCH, are explicitly recognized in the Convention. However, as far as the Convention Articles 9 and 10 are concerned,the rights of States of origin are clearly exercisable by the States Parties, whereas their application for non-States Parties is not set in stone. After acceding to the Convention, China can further clarify its relevant rights by directly referring to Articles 9 and 10 of the Convention. Before that, however, the exercise of such rights may depend on the principle of reciprocity. Therefore, linking back the above discussion on jurisdiction, China could refer to Belgium’s legislation to claim ownership over all the UCH that is found in its EEZ or on its continental shelf, with the exception of State vessels and aircraft of foreign origin. On this basis, China can accommodate the rights of other States, as identifiable countries of origin, to the UCH that is found in the EEZ or continental shelf of China (such as the right to participate in protection and research), in order to guarantee China’s corresponding rights to the UCH that is found in the EEZ or on the continental shelf of other States.

    D. Warships and Other State Vessels

    A considerable number of foreign warships sank in the waters of Belgium in the First and Second World Wars and have been under water since then. As a result, Belgian domestic legislation contains detailed provisions for sunken warships and other State vessels that meet the definition of UCH. However, China has adopted a rather vague attitude towards this issue and, accordingly, has not set out any pertinent provision in its domestic laws.29LIN Zhen, Legal Status of Sunken Warships That Meet the Definition of Underwater Cultural Heritage in Territorial Waters: Legislations of China and ASEAN States, China Oceans Law Review, No. 2, 2018.This must change, given that a considerable number of foreign warships that meet the definition of UCH under the Convention are also lying in the waters of China. The legal status of these warships should be clearly defined in the pertinent Chinese legislation so as to spare administrative headache for all those whose work is in connection with UCH.

    According to the existing legislation of China, China claims rights over: (a)all the cultural relics that are found in its internal waters and territorial sea; (b)the cultural relics of Chinese or unidentifiable origin that are located in the EEZ or on the continental shelf of China, and (c) the cultural relics of Chinese origin that are located in the sea areas of any foreign State other than its internal and territorial waters, or in the high seas. On the former two, China claims ownership and jurisdiction. Notably, China does not claim rights over sunken foreign warships that are found in its EEZ or on its continental shelf, which is consistent with the provisions of the Convention. Conversely, China claims ownership over the sunken warships and other State vessels that meet the definition of underwater cultural relics and are found in its territorial waters, regardless of their flag States. This principle has never been applied in practice since, to date, China has never carried out any archaeological excavation directed at a foreign State vessel.

    Similarly, the Exposure Draft has not made any provision for foreign State vessels or aircraft. As discussed above, it is not a tenable solution to exclude foreign warships from the scope of underwater cultural relics by using the year 1911 as a time criterion to define underwater cultural relics. In the perspective of the author, to create an article specifying the legal status of sunken warships and other State vessels that meet the definition of underwater cultural relics would otherwise be feasible, which will provide practical guidance to those whose work is in connection with UCH. Moreover, the Convention does provide a viable solution:coastal States and flag States should cooperate in order to ensure the adequate protection of this particular category of UCH. China may also refer to Belgium’s domestic laws, which guarantee the protection of such vessels by means of consultation with the flag States while reserving the right for protective measures to be unilaterally taken in case of immediate danger.

    E. International Cooperation

    With regard to international cooperation, Belgium directly incorporated the relevant provisions of the Convention into its legislation. Considering the UCH protection efforts undergoing currently in China, international cooperation is inevitable. And such cooperation seems necessary and welcome to the protection of both the UCH of foreign origin that is located in China’s EEZ or on its continental shelf and the UCH of Chinese origin that is located in other States’ EEZ or continental shelf.

    So how should China legislate to ensure the protection of the cultural heritage mentioned above through international cooperation? Ever since 1989 when the Regulation was enacted, no underwater archaeological survey or excavation in cooperation with any other country has ever been conducted in China’s waters.Nonetheless, the revisions reflected in the Exposure Draft, essentially, would facilitate international cooperation, as Article 10(3) stipulates:

    Foreign States, international organizations and foreign legal persons or natural persons, if they intend to conduct exploration or excavation activities in the waters under Chinese jurisdiction, shall do so in cooperation with the Chinese side, and shall submit their application therefor to the competent authorities under the State Council for approval.

    Compared to the current Regulation,30Article 7(2) of the Regulation: foreign States, international organizations and foreign legal persons or natural persons that are to conduct archaeological exploration or excavation activities in the waters under Chinese jurisdiction shall do so in cooperation with the Chinese side, and shall submit their application therefor to the National Cultural Heritage Administration, which shall further submit it to the State Council of the People’s Republic of China for special approval.the abovementioned application process has been simplified. Specifically, a special permission by the State Council is no longer required. These changes reflect the willingness of China’s organizations or entities in charge of UCH protection to cooperate with their counterparts in other States.

    However, further arrangements are needed to carry out international cooperation on a practical level. In this regard, it must be noted that the current provisions of the Regulation are only concerned with the protection of the underwater cultural relics found in the waters of China. No provisions have been made with regard to the protection of relics of Chinese origin that are located in the waters of other States. Since China has not yet acceded to the Convention, it cannot directly invoke the provisions of the Convention on international cooperation.Nevertheless, the Exposure Draft may add a separate article to support the rights of States of origin, including China’s right to identify the owner of the UCH of Chinese origin that is located in the EEZ or on the continental shelf of other States;in this way, international cooperation would be possible based on the principle of reciprocity.

    III. Conclusion

    While China is considering acceding to the Convention, the amendment of the Regulation has been underway with the intent to make it consistent with the fundamental principles of the Convention. In this regard, Belgium represents a very good example to follow, since Belgium is one of the few States to have enacted new laws in line with the Convention after accession. By conducting a thorough study and analysis of Belgium’s newly-adopted law on UCH protection, it was found that it is not an exact duplicate of the Convention. Rather, it presents several ad hoc modifications. On the one hand, the basic principles of the Convention, such as the principles of preservation in situ, prohibition of commercial exploitation and encouragement of international cooperation, are strictly adhered to. On the other hand, Belgium’s provisions on the matters of jurisdiction and ownership appear to be more focused on the preservation of its national interests, so as to provide maximum protection to UCH.

    The Exposure Draft has made some adjustments to best deal with the newly emerging challenges and strengthen the feasibility of the Regulation. These changes appear to be respectful of the general principles of the Convention and would promote the protection of UCH in China. However, there is still room for improvement, especially in the provisions concerning the definition of UCH,jurisdiction, State vessels and aircraft meeting the definition of “UCH” and, lastly,international cooperation.

    In the Exposure Draft, Articles 2 and 3 have remained the same as in the Regulation. They may possibly be amended in the future. In the current version of the Regulation, both the provision concerning the application scope and the one regarding the definition of the term “underwater cultural relics” are placed under Article 2. The study here conducted recommends for these provisions to be divided into two separate articles. As to Article 2, it is not recommended setting a time limit for all the underwater cultural relics that are located in China’s territorial waters. However, it is advisable to apply the Convention’s criterion of 100 years to the cultural relics that are situated in China’s EEZ or on its continental shelf.Furthermore, with reference to Belgium’s legislation, China may decide to extend its jurisdiction and ownership to cover all the UCH that is found in its EEZ or on its continental shelf (excluding State vessels and aircraft), while also reserving the rights of States of origin to provide consultation and participate in relevant discussions, therefore to create possibility for future cooperation. In line with the principle of reciprocity, China can claim right to the same with regards to UCH of Chinese origin that is located in the EEZ or on the continental shelf of other States. Lastly, the Exposure Draft should consider adding one more article that clearly defines the legal status of State vessels and aircraft of foreign origin that meet the definition of “underwater cultural relics” under the Regulation. Based on the lessons drawn from Belgium, the new article should ensure that China consults with the flag States over the effective protection of such vessels and aircraft,cooperates with them accordingly but also reserves the right to act unilaterally in cases of emergency.

    猜你喜歡
    國家文物局文化遺產(chǎn)中心
    剪掉和中心無關(guān)的
    中宣部、文旅部、國家文物局發(fā)布重要文件
    客家文博(2022年1期)2022-08-22 06:30:54
    在打造“兩個中心”中彰顯統(tǒng)戰(zhàn)擔(dān)當作為
    華人時刊(2021年15期)2021-11-27 09:16:42
    與文化遺產(chǎn)相遇
    小讀者(2021年6期)2021-07-22 01:49:46
    酌古參今——頤和園文化遺產(chǎn)之美
    非物質(zhì)文化遺產(chǎn)欣賞
    ——圍棋
    別讓托養(yǎng)中心成“死亡中心”
    北上廣操心“副中心”
    博客天下(2015年17期)2015-09-15 14:55:10
    國家文物局將9件周代青銅器劃撥上海博物館
    文化遺產(chǎn)保護
    江蘇年鑒(2014年0期)2014-03-11 17:09:53
    在线观看www视频免费| 国产精品秋霞免费鲁丝片| 国产成人精品无人区| 国产免费现黄频在线看| 51国产日韩欧美| 成人国语在线视频| 亚洲怡红院男人天堂| 色94色欧美一区二区| 久久精品国产鲁丝片午夜精品| 日韩一区二区视频免费看| 少妇熟女欧美另类| 久久久久久伊人网av| 欧美人与性动交α欧美精品济南到 | 一级毛片aaaaaa免费看小| 人人澡人人妻人| 观看美女的网站| 日韩av免费高清视频| 99精国产麻豆久久婷婷| 欧美激情极品国产一区二区三区 | 人妻 亚洲 视频| av黄色大香蕉| 丝袜喷水一区| 日本欧美视频一区| 国产午夜精品一二区理论片| 中国美白少妇内射xxxbb| 晚上一个人看的免费电影| 飞空精品影院首页| xxxhd国产人妻xxx| 少妇猛男粗大的猛烈进出视频| 男女边摸边吃奶| 国产一区二区三区av在线| 国产高清不卡午夜福利| 高清视频免费观看一区二区| 亚洲国产精品999| 国产淫语在线视频| 国产深夜福利视频在线观看| 99九九在线精品视频| 春色校园在线视频观看| 久久综合国产亚洲精品| 97在线视频观看| 国产av一区二区精品久久| 欧美变态另类bdsm刘玥| 亚洲欧美一区二区三区国产| 亚洲国产最新在线播放| 日韩亚洲欧美综合| 丰满少妇做爰视频| 免费av中文字幕在线| 青春草亚洲视频在线观看| 久久久久久久久大av| 欧美日韩一区二区视频在线观看视频在线| 亚洲精品久久成人aⅴ小说 | 国产黄色视频一区二区在线观看| 啦啦啦视频在线资源免费观看| 一区二区三区四区激情视频| 亚洲美女视频黄频| 免费播放大片免费观看视频在线观看| 一区在线观看完整版| 日韩一本色道免费dvd| 少妇被粗大的猛进出69影院 | 啦啦啦啦在线视频资源| 国产成人aa在线观看| 一区二区三区免费毛片| 能在线免费看毛片的网站| 黄色怎么调成土黄色| 日韩不卡一区二区三区视频在线| tube8黄色片| 交换朋友夫妻互换小说| 大陆偷拍与自拍| 国产精品99久久久久久久久| 精品一品国产午夜福利视频| 亚洲一级一片aⅴ在线观看| av免费观看日本| 精品99又大又爽又粗少妇毛片| 精品熟女少妇av免费看| 亚洲中文av在线| 一级毛片电影观看| 日日撸夜夜添| 免费看av在线观看网站| 天堂中文最新版在线下载| 欧美黄色片欧美黄色片| 成人av一区二区三区在线看| 亚洲综合色网址| 免费人妻精品一区二区三区视频| 丝袜喷水一区| 日本五十路高清| 老司机在亚洲福利影院| 天天躁日日躁夜夜躁夜夜| 搡老熟女国产l中国老女人| 日日爽夜夜爽网站| av一本久久久久| 成人18禁在线播放| 日本av手机在线免费观看| 香蕉久久夜色| 亚洲午夜精品一区,二区,三区| 在线播放国产精品三级| 久久久久久久久免费视频了| 午夜91福利影院| 又黄又粗又硬又大视频| 变态另类成人亚洲欧美熟女 | 电影成人av| 丝袜喷水一区| tube8黄色片| 午夜免费成人在线视频| 欧美日韩国产mv在线观看视频| 日本一区二区免费在线视频| 亚洲专区国产一区二区| 国产高清国产精品国产三级| av福利片在线| 久久久国产成人免费| 国产有黄有色有爽视频| 国产高清激情床上av| 国产99久久九九免费精品| 精品国产国语对白av| 欧美日韩国产mv在线观看视频| 我的亚洲天堂| 色视频在线一区二区三区| 精品一区二区三区四区五区乱码| 亚洲人成电影观看| 人人妻人人爽人人添夜夜欢视频| 国产成人欧美| 每晚都被弄得嗷嗷叫到高潮| 午夜两性在线视频| 一区二区三区激情视频| 中文字幕制服av| 国产亚洲精品第一综合不卡| 大码成人一级视频| 大型av网站在线播放| 精品人妻熟女毛片av久久网站| 在线观看一区二区三区激情| 50天的宝宝边吃奶边哭怎么回事| a在线观看视频网站| 久久免费观看电影| 亚洲av欧美aⅴ国产| 久久久久久久久久久久大奶| 国产成人精品在线电影| 国产深夜福利视频在线观看| 精品视频人人做人人爽| 老熟妇乱子伦视频在线观看| 男男h啪啪无遮挡| 国产片内射在线| 啦啦啦在线免费观看视频4| 99热网站在线观看| 国产免费现黄频在线看| 日韩视频一区二区在线观看| 国产成人精品无人区| 色精品久久人妻99蜜桃| 国产91精品成人一区二区三区 | 999久久久精品免费观看国产| 国产精品熟女久久久久浪| 老司机福利观看| 成人18禁高潮啪啪吃奶动态图| 人人妻人人澡人人看| 18禁黄网站禁片午夜丰满| 十八禁人妻一区二区| 欧美成狂野欧美在线观看| 嫁个100分男人电影在线观看| 19禁男女啪啪无遮挡网站| 十八禁网站免费在线| 国产欧美日韩精品亚洲av| 日韩熟女老妇一区二区性免费视频| 91字幕亚洲| 日本欧美视频一区| 亚洲一区中文字幕在线| 亚洲精品av麻豆狂野| 免费一级毛片在线播放高清视频 | av在线播放免费不卡| 在线观看一区二区三区激情| 一区二区三区乱码不卡18| 国产精品成人在线| 亚洲人成电影观看| 久久精品亚洲av国产电影网| 18在线观看网站| 久久精品人人爽人人爽视色| 国产亚洲精品第一综合不卡| 亚洲成人国产一区在线观看| 成年动漫av网址| 两个人免费观看高清视频| 亚洲av美国av| 日韩人妻精品一区2区三区| 一区二区三区激情视频| 黑人巨大精品欧美一区二区蜜桃| 亚洲精品av麻豆狂野| 九色亚洲精品在线播放| 国产精品国产高清国产av | 青青草视频在线视频观看| 制服人妻中文乱码| videosex国产| 男女免费视频国产| 男女下面插进去视频免费观看| 成年人免费黄色播放视频| 中文字幕人妻丝袜制服| 99热国产这里只有精品6| videosex国产| 国产亚洲精品久久久久5区| 欧美日本中文国产一区发布| 亚洲,欧美精品.| 老司机靠b影院| 日本vs欧美在线观看视频| 国产片内射在线| 777米奇影视久久| 啦啦啦视频在线资源免费观看| 黄色片一级片一级黄色片| av有码第一页| 中亚洲国语对白在线视频| bbb黄色大片| 母亲3免费完整高清在线观看| 波多野结衣av一区二区av| 亚洲情色 制服丝袜| 国产在视频线精品| 国产av国产精品国产| 精品国产一区二区三区久久久樱花| 精品视频人人做人人爽| 亚洲欧美激情在线| 午夜精品国产一区二区电影| 国产男靠女视频免费网站| 宅男免费午夜| 亚洲精品中文字幕一二三四区 | 悠悠久久av| 无遮挡黄片免费观看| 99久久99久久久精品蜜桃| 一级黄色大片毛片| 香蕉久久夜色| 日日爽夜夜爽网站| 黄色成人免费大全| 老熟妇仑乱视频hdxx| 大码成人一级视频| 亚洲国产中文字幕在线视频| 啦啦啦在线免费观看视频4| 午夜精品国产一区二区电影| av欧美777| 日韩视频在线欧美| av网站免费在线观看视频| 亚洲国产av影院在线观看| 黄色怎么调成土黄色| 国产精品亚洲av一区麻豆| 色婷婷久久久亚洲欧美| 老熟女久久久| 99精国产麻豆久久婷婷| 精品欧美一区二区三区在线| 精品久久久久久电影网| 国产成人啪精品午夜网站| 国产成人精品久久二区二区免费| 久久青草综合色| 久久 成人 亚洲| 亚洲va日本ⅴa欧美va伊人久久| 欧美性长视频在线观看| 精品国产亚洲在线| 国产精品一区二区精品视频观看| 我要看黄色一级片免费的| 亚洲国产成人一精品久久久| 极品少妇高潮喷水抽搐| 国产精品免费视频内射| 极品少妇高潮喷水抽搐| 成人特级黄色片久久久久久久 | 亚洲综合色网址| 精品少妇久久久久久888优播| 欧美精品人与动牲交sv欧美| 欧美人与性动交α欧美精品济南到| 男女免费视频国产| 欧美日韩福利视频一区二区| 日本vs欧美在线观看视频| 美女扒开内裤让男人捅视频| 在线av久久热| 怎么达到女性高潮| xxxhd国产人妻xxx| 中文亚洲av片在线观看爽 | 久久久久久久久久久久大奶| 天堂中文最新版在线下载| 欧美激情高清一区二区三区| 一级,二级,三级黄色视频| 亚洲第一欧美日韩一区二区三区 | 久久国产精品男人的天堂亚洲| 成人av一区二区三区在线看| 中文字幕人妻丝袜一区二区| 自线自在国产av| 一区二区日韩欧美中文字幕| 欧美黑人欧美精品刺激| 国产伦人伦偷精品视频| 国产精品.久久久| 久久久国产成人免费| 亚洲一卡2卡3卡4卡5卡精品中文| 久久精品国产亚洲av高清一级| 国产又爽黄色视频| 女人久久www免费人成看片| 少妇精品久久久久久久| 亚洲少妇的诱惑av| 精品视频人人做人人爽| 满18在线观看网站| 大陆偷拍与自拍| 夜夜爽天天搞| 久久精品aⅴ一区二区三区四区| 亚洲专区字幕在线| 制服人妻中文乱码| 免费日韩欧美在线观看| 国产日韩一区二区三区精品不卡| 久久人人爽av亚洲精品天堂| 搡老乐熟女国产| 99久久国产精品久久久| √禁漫天堂资源中文www| 亚洲中文日韩欧美视频| 极品少妇高潮喷水抽搐| 国产精品九九99| 欧美黄色淫秽网站| 高潮久久久久久久久久久不卡| 国产高清国产精品国产三级| 变态另类成人亚洲欧美熟女 | 十八禁网站免费在线| 国产在线一区二区三区精| 国产主播在线观看一区二区| 久久免费观看电影| 最新的欧美精品一区二区| a在线观看视频网站| 黄色丝袜av网址大全| 女性被躁到高潮视频| 亚洲精品av麻豆狂野| 在线亚洲精品国产二区图片欧美| 97在线人人人人妻| 女人久久www免费人成看片| 最黄视频免费看| 欧美日韩福利视频一区二区| 国产精品熟女久久久久浪| 黄片小视频在线播放| 男女下面插进去视频免费观看| 国产福利在线免费观看视频| av片东京热男人的天堂| 三级毛片av免费| 午夜91福利影院| 变态另类成人亚洲欧美熟女 | 精品熟女少妇八av免费久了| 最新在线观看一区二区三区| 热99国产精品久久久久久7| 亚洲精品在线美女| 亚洲国产毛片av蜜桃av| 中文字幕人妻丝袜制服| 一区二区三区精品91| 深夜精品福利| 久久99一区二区三区| 大香蕉久久成人网| 色婷婷av一区二区三区视频| 国产精品久久电影中文字幕 | 在线十欧美十亚洲十日本专区| 丝袜美足系列| 国产亚洲欧美精品永久| 怎么达到女性高潮| 正在播放国产对白刺激| 美国免费a级毛片| 国产精品99久久99久久久不卡| 国产成人欧美| 亚洲av成人不卡在线观看播放网| 久久人人97超碰香蕉20202| 自线自在国产av| 亚洲久久久国产精品| a级毛片黄视频| h视频一区二区三区| 大型av网站在线播放| 国产高清激情床上av| 99精品欧美一区二区三区四区| 91麻豆av在线| 母亲3免费完整高清在线观看| 夜夜爽天天搞| 后天国语完整版免费观看| 亚洲情色 制服丝袜| 黑人巨大精品欧美一区二区mp4| 热re99久久国产66热| 女人高潮潮喷娇喘18禁视频| 国产亚洲精品久久久久5区| 国产精品久久电影中文字幕 | 国产在线观看jvid| 热99久久久久精品小说推荐| 99香蕉大伊视频| 满18在线观看网站| 国产精品欧美亚洲77777| 淫妇啪啪啪对白视频| 老司机午夜福利在线观看视频 | 久久久久久久久久久久大奶| 日本撒尿小便嘘嘘汇集6| 搡老熟女国产l中国老女人| 成人影院久久| 天天躁日日躁夜夜躁夜夜| 国产日韩欧美亚洲二区| 欧美在线一区亚洲| 男女之事视频高清在线观看| 老司机午夜福利在线观看视频 | 亚洲伊人久久精品综合| 人人妻人人添人人爽欧美一区卜| 亚洲情色 制服丝袜| 中文字幕高清在线视频| 亚洲中文字幕日韩| 一区二区日韩欧美中文字幕| 如日韩欧美国产精品一区二区三区| 久久精品国产99精品国产亚洲性色 | 国产男女超爽视频在线观看| 国产成人一区二区三区免费视频网站| 亚洲精品一二三| 免费少妇av软件| 免费观看人在逋| 欧美成狂野欧美在线观看| 窝窝影院91人妻| 国精品久久久久久国模美| 精品人妻1区二区| 美女高潮喷水抽搐中文字幕| 中文字幕人妻丝袜一区二区| 久久香蕉激情| 人人妻人人澡人人看| 一本久久精品| 国产xxxxx性猛交| 美女高潮喷水抽搐中文字幕| 美女高潮到喷水免费观看| 欧美精品一区二区大全| 成人三级做爰电影| 午夜久久久在线观看| 亚洲精品国产区一区二| 亚洲精品国产精品久久久不卡| 亚洲美女黄片视频| 成人亚洲精品一区在线观看| 久久久欧美国产精品| 国产精品美女特级片免费视频播放器 | 久久人人97超碰香蕉20202| 亚洲av第一区精品v没综合| 欧美成狂野欧美在线观看| 国产aⅴ精品一区二区三区波| 精品一区二区三区四区五区乱码| 美女福利国产在线| 在线亚洲精品国产二区图片欧美| 国产精品亚洲一级av第二区| 19禁男女啪啪无遮挡网站| 在线观看免费日韩欧美大片| 少妇猛男粗大的猛烈进出视频| 亚洲中文字幕日韩| 午夜福利一区二区在线看| 青草久久国产| 亚洲av片天天在线观看| 人人澡人人妻人| 精品亚洲乱码少妇综合久久| 一区二区日韩欧美中文字幕| 丝袜人妻中文字幕| 久久影院123| 中文字幕制服av| 久久久精品区二区三区| 久久毛片免费看一区二区三区| 国产xxxxx性猛交| 男女下面插进去视频免费观看| 婷婷丁香在线五月| 岛国在线观看网站| 日韩欧美国产一区二区入口| 国产免费av片在线观看野外av| 久久精品亚洲熟妇少妇任你| avwww免费| 国产在线免费精品| 日本vs欧美在线观看视频| 久热爱精品视频在线9| 91老司机精品| 狠狠精品人妻久久久久久综合| 国产一区二区三区视频了| 亚洲 国产 在线| 99精国产麻豆久久婷婷| 性少妇av在线| 久久国产精品人妻蜜桃| 三上悠亚av全集在线观看| 日韩欧美一区二区三区在线观看 | 999久久久精品免费观看国产| netflix在线观看网站| 国产精品影院久久| 黑人巨大精品欧美一区二区蜜桃| 自线自在国产av| 老司机在亚洲福利影院| 99国产精品免费福利视频| 男女边摸边吃奶| 久久久久视频综合| 99久久精品国产亚洲精品| 在线观看免费视频日本深夜| 国产精品一区二区在线观看99| 99在线人妻在线中文字幕 | 不卡av一区二区三区| 宅男免费午夜| 国产av精品麻豆| 欧美国产精品一级二级三级| 免费看a级黄色片| 精品国产一区二区三区久久久樱花| 成人黄色视频免费在线看| 久久影院123| 欧美国产精品一级二级三级| 欧美日韩福利视频一区二区| 午夜福利影视在线免费观看| 亚洲国产成人一精品久久久| 动漫黄色视频在线观看| 51午夜福利影视在线观看| 国内毛片毛片毛片毛片毛片| 国产高清国产精品国产三级| 一级a爱视频在线免费观看| 亚洲成人免费电影在线观看| 国产日韩欧美在线精品| 99re6热这里在线精品视频| 亚洲精品乱久久久久久| 国产亚洲欧美精品永久| 亚洲国产欧美日韩在线播放| 国产精品九九99| 人妻 亚洲 视频| 18禁黄网站禁片午夜丰满| 国产亚洲欧美精品永久| 不卡一级毛片| 国产视频一区二区在线看| netflix在线观看网站| 国产日韩欧美在线精品| 午夜激情久久久久久久| 91九色精品人成在线观看| 大香蕉久久网| 亚洲色图综合在线观看| 高清视频免费观看一区二区| tocl精华| 12—13女人毛片做爰片一| 51午夜福利影视在线观看| 色婷婷久久久亚洲欧美| 我要看黄色一级片免费的| 久久中文字幕一级| 婷婷丁香在线五月| 成年动漫av网址| 久久天躁狠狠躁夜夜2o2o| 美女国产高潮福利片在线看| 日韩人妻精品一区2区三区| 两人在一起打扑克的视频| 国产精品麻豆人妻色哟哟久久| 叶爱在线成人免费视频播放| 欧美精品av麻豆av| 久久毛片免费看一区二区三区| 久久99一区二区三区| www日本在线高清视频| 黑丝袜美女国产一区| 在线观看免费日韩欧美大片| 热re99久久精品国产66热6| 亚洲黑人精品在线| 777久久人妻少妇嫩草av网站| 国产视频一区二区在线看| 汤姆久久久久久久影院中文字幕| 免费不卡黄色视频| 少妇精品久久久久久久| 99热国产这里只有精品6| 9色porny在线观看| www.999成人在线观看| 久久人妻av系列| 亚洲成人免费电影在线观看| 男人操女人黄网站| 人人澡人人妻人| 91精品三级在线观看| 亚洲情色 制服丝袜| 十八禁网站网址无遮挡| 丰满迷人的少妇在线观看| 建设人人有责人人尽责人人享有的| 国产在线免费精品| 亚洲欧美日韩高清在线视频 | 91成人精品电影| 日韩熟女老妇一区二区性免费视频| 一级毛片女人18水好多| videosex国产| 人人澡人人妻人| 我的亚洲天堂| 国产欧美亚洲国产| 精品国产国语对白av| 国产在线视频一区二区| 久久久久国内视频| 麻豆乱淫一区二区| 久久久国产成人免费| 国产成人精品久久二区二区免费| 国产成人系列免费观看| 人妻久久中文字幕网| 欧美av亚洲av综合av国产av| 国产男女内射视频| 热re99久久精品国产66热6| 麻豆国产av国片精品| 国产老妇伦熟女老妇高清| 两个人免费观看高清视频| 国产精品久久电影中文字幕 | 黑人巨大精品欧美一区二区mp4| 亚洲精品粉嫩美女一区| 一本综合久久免费| 狠狠狠狠99中文字幕| 国产成人精品久久二区二区免费| 精品一品国产午夜福利视频| √禁漫天堂资源中文www| 欧美变态另类bdsm刘玥| 亚洲情色 制服丝袜| 国产亚洲欧美在线一区二区| 黄色毛片三级朝国网站| 亚洲性夜色夜夜综合| 99国产精品一区二区三区| 国产伦人伦偷精品视频| 一级a爱视频在线免费观看| 久久精品亚洲av国产电影网| 国产视频一区二区在线看| 亚洲一卡2卡3卡4卡5卡精品中文| 在线观看舔阴道视频| 狠狠婷婷综合久久久久久88av| 天天躁日日躁夜夜躁夜夜| 日本a在线网址| 亚洲精品一卡2卡三卡4卡5卡| 90打野战视频偷拍视频| av不卡在线播放| 久久天躁狠狠躁夜夜2o2o| 美女视频免费永久观看网站| aaaaa片日本免费| 午夜福利欧美成人| 欧美日韩亚洲国产一区二区在线观看 | 成人三级做爰电影| 在线永久观看黄色视频| 怎么达到女性高潮| 少妇裸体淫交视频免费看高清 | 99久久人妻综合| 一本—道久久a久久精品蜜桃钙片| www.自偷自拍.com| 777米奇影视久久| 国产免费av片在线观看野外av| 国产一区二区 视频在线| 日韩熟女老妇一区二区性免费视频| 色播在线永久视频| 久久免费观看电影|