• <tr id="yyy80"></tr>
  • <sup id="yyy80"></sup>
  • <tfoot id="yyy80"><noscript id="yyy80"></noscript></tfoot>
  • 99热精品在线国产_美女午夜性视频免费_国产精品国产高清国产av_av欧美777_自拍偷自拍亚洲精品老妇_亚洲熟女精品中文字幕_www日本黄色视频网_国产精品野战在线观看 ?

    Research on Satisfaction ofexsitu Relocated Households

    2019-03-20 03:01:54
    Asian Agricultural Research 2019年2期

    College of Economics and Management, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan 430070, China

    Abstract Based on the survey data ofexsiturelocated households in Hubei and Hunan provinces in 2017, the specific satisfaction levels of the relocated farmers in the two provinces and the influencing factors were analyzed in this paper. It is found that theexsiturelocated farmers in Hubei and Hunan provinces have higher levels of satisfaction. The satisfaction of farmers who have been relocated to poverty alleviation is obviously affected by the characteristics of relocation and support policies. Even after controlling the farmer individual characteristic variables and family characteristic variables, the relocation characteristics and support policies still have a significant impact on the satisfaction of the farmers in the anti-poverty relocation, indicating that the relocated farmers with different backgrounds have a similar understanding of the satisfaction of theexsituanti-poverty relocation.

    Key words Exsituanti-poverty relocation, Satisfaction, Hierarchy process analysis, Ordered logit model

    1 Introduction

    Theexsitupoverty alleviation project is not just simple migration of people or change of residence. Instead, it is a systemic project of economic restructuring and social reconstruction. Needless to say, after the relocation, the housing conditions of the farmers have been improved. However, there are also problems such as insufficient participation of poor households, too tight schedules for relocation work, and imperfect follow-up supporting industries, which may lead to the phenomenon that relocated households are "unwilling to move in" or "willing to move out after relocation". In the survey, it is found that after some poor households in the mountainous areas of western Hubei were relocated, they were far from the original production area. Due to lack of follow-up industry support, some relocated households still choose to ride a motorcycle or walk for more than 10 km to work in the field. Due to weak industrial base, coupled with insufficient workforce skills training, some of the relocated households are still narrow in the income-increasing areas, and their subsequent development is difficult. The infrastructure construction in the relocation areas lags behind, and the investment in environment sanitation, education and medical care is insufficient. These factors not only affect the relocation enthusiasm of the relocated households. They are more related to the expected policy effect of the relocation project. What is the satisfaction of the relocated households on theexsituanti-poverty relocation policy? Does the policy supply meet the actual needs of the relocated households? Has the relocation project reached the policy objective of "relocating one household making one household get rid of poverty"? How to improve the relocation policy afterwards? In addition to moving in, how to ensure that the relocated households are stable, secured and able to get rich? These issues are subject to further study.

    Farmer’s adaptation to the natural and social environment of the resettlement site is the basis for their integration into local life. The satisfaction of the relocated farmers can reflect the impact of the entire relocation project on their lives and the overall affect of the project[1]. Therefore, the satisfaction ofexsituanti-poverty relocated households is a key factor in evaluating the success or failure of resettlement work. By exploring the main factors affecting the relocation satisfaction of farmers, the practical understanding ofexsitupoverty alleviation research will be deepened, the direction of reform and improvement of theexsitupoverty alleviation policy will be clarified. As China’s urbanization process accelerates, a large number of rural populations continue to gather in cities and towns, leading to a phenomenon of hollowing out and empty nesting in rural areas. Theexsituanti-poverty relocation project is to move the poor households in remote mountainous areas to the centralized resettlement communities with relatively good production and living conditions. On the basis of further promoting urbanization construction, it also provides a new research direction for rural population agglomeration.

    2 Literature review

    TheEleventhFive-YearPlanforex situAnti-PovertyRelocationissued by National Development and Reform Commission in 2006 proposes that the relocation of poverty-stricken areas is an important poverty alleviation measure that the party and the government have explored an implemented in the new era. By relocating the poor living in areas that are not suitable for human survival, the dual goal of eliminating poverty and improving the ecology will be achieved. Chen Minfengetal. believe thatexsituanti-poverty relocation, as one of the important modes of precision poverty alleviation, resettle the poor people living in the area that cannot afford the people to other places with better natural and infrastructure conditions, blocking the intergeneration transmission of poverty and creating conditions for them to get rid of poverty and get rich. It is essentially a poverty alleviation method for systematic relocation through comprehensive consideration of the survival cost, survival mode and living environment of poor groups[2]. From the experience of China’s ex situ anti-poverty relocation, the relocated households can be divided into two categories. One is "survival-oriented" relocated households of which the original living environment is poor and the original living is remote, or the original living areas are threatened by geographical disasters. The other is "development-oriented" relocated households facing poor housing conditions, difficult medical treatment and difficulties in attending school[3]. The current studies on theexsituanti-poverty relocation in China are mostly conducted using theoretical elaboration or theoretical elaboration combined with case analysis, lacking evidence from empirical research.

    Based on the current research, the influencing factors of the satisfaction of farmers with theexsituanti-poverty relocation are roughly divided into five aspects: individual characteristics, family characteristics, economic factors (Yang Yongmeietal.[4]), social factors (Wang Jintao and Chen Qi) and policy factors. Zhang Yueetal.[5]studied the ecological relocation site in Jingling New Village in Ningxia and found that the three main factors that affect the satisfaction of the relocated groups are environment, ecology and social services. Chen Wenchaoetal.[6]believe that adaptation to the resettlement, the conditions of resettlement, and the cognition of managers are important factors influencing the satisfaction of reservoir resettlers. Taking the characteristics of relocated households, income and expenditure of relocated families, production conditions of relocation site, living conditions of relocation site, social conditions, resource conditions and environmental conditions as independent variables and the satisfaction of reservoir resettlers as depended variable, Qiu Yuanfeng found that the impact of children’s dependency ratio, old-age dependency ratio, per capita net income, per capita arable land area, cultivated land quality, cultivated land radius and irrigation conditions, as well as infrastructure and implementation of relocation polices on the satisfaction of reservoir resettlers is significant. Among the characteristic variables of relocated households, the age of householder, the health status of householder and the population of household have certain influence on the satisfaction of reservoir resettlers, but the impact is not significant. Among the variables of living conditions, the influence of housing material, and per capita housing area on reservoir resettlers’s satisfaction is not significant[7]. Feng Xiaotian studied the resettlers in the Three Gorges. It was found that in the early stage of relocation, the relocation method is the main factor affecting the social adaptation of resettlers. In the middle stage of relocation, the way of relocation, lifestyle differences and government concern are important factors. In the later stage of relocation, resettlers have become accustomed to the lifestyle of resettlement sites over time. Therefore, the relocation method is no longer the main influencing factors. Instead, the factors such as the security situation of the resettlement site and the time of relocation have become the main influencing factors.

    3 Data sources,indicator selection and model selection

    3.1DatasourceThe data of this paper comes from the survey data of the projects of National Development and Reform Commission (Assessmentofex situAnti-povertyRelocationWorkin2017) and the State Council Leading Group Office of Poverty Alleviation and Development (TracingResearchandImpactAssessmentofex situAnti-povertyRelocationduring13thFive-YearPlanPeriod) hosted by the School of Agriculture and Rural Development of Renmin University of China. The survey is based on the file establishment and card registration big data platform. Tow provinces, Hubei and Hunan provinces with lots of relocation work are selected. Three counties in Hubei Province are selected randomly, Jianshi, Badong and Zigui. Two counties in Hunan Province are selected, Xupu and Pingjiang. A total of 125 households are selected from each county. All sample households must correspond to the poverty alleviation households in the national poverty alleviation and development information system. In the sampling process, the villages and farmers who have been relocated in the past two years are selected as much as possible to facilitate follow-up monitoring after the relocation in the following years.

    During the investigation, interviews and questionnaire surveys are conducted on all sample households in Hubei and Hunan provinces (except special circumstances such as the whole family are working in city) to learn more about the current situation of the relocated farmers and the actual demand for the relocation. A total of 558 pieces of valid data are collected. Because this study is for poor households who have already implemented relocation, 339 households that have been relocated are selected from the survey data for research.

    3.2Indicatorselection

    3.2.1Indicators for the satisfaction ofexsituanti-poverty relocated households. The five-level Likert scale is used to measure the satisfaction of the relocated households with the relocation policies. That is, the evaluation of the relocated households on the relocation work is divided into five levels, very unsatisfied, unsatisfied, general, satisfied, and very satisfied. The corresponding scores of the evaluation levels are 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5. On this basis, this paper constructs a policy evaluation index system for relocated farmers consisting of 4 grade II indicators (living conditions, infrastructure, neighborhood relations and support measures) and 16 grade III indicators. Finally, the weight of each indicator is calculated by the hierarchy process analysis. The importance of every two factors is compared by the professors and doctoral students from the College of Economic Management of Huazhong Agricultural University. After the consistency test, the judgment matrix is obtained. The weight of each indicator is calculated using the yaahp 10.1 software (Table 1). According to the weighed calculation method, the satisfaction of the relocated households is calculated.

    The calculation results show that the overall satisfaction of the relocated farmers in the two provinces reaches a very high level. As shown in Table 2, the average score of evaluation of relocated farmers in the two provinces reaches 4.08 points. Among them, the individuals with evaluation ranging between "very unsatisfied" and "unsatisfied" account for 0%, and the individuals with evaluation ranging between "unsatisfied" and "general" account for 2.37%. The average score of satisfaction of relocated farmers in Hunan Province is slightly higher than that in Hubei Province. There are 10 farmers in Hunan Province but only one farmer in Hubei Province who scores five points for policy satisfaction.

    Table1Weightsofsatisfactionindicators

    Target layerCriteria layer indicators and weightsMeasure indicators and weights cjCombination weight diPolicy satisfaction yLiving conditions C1(0.393 5)House site selection D1(0.045 2)0.017 8House area D2(0.205 7)0.080 9House quality D3(0.267 3)0.105 2House design D4(0.214 4)0.084 4Water and electricity design D5(0.267 3)0.105 2Infrastructure C2(0.127 8)Road construction D6(0.319 9)0.040 9Garbage disposal D7(0.070 7)0.009 0Kindergarten D8(0.137 6)0.017 6Primary school and junior high school D9(0.168 9)0.021 6Hospital and clinic D10(0.108 4)0.013 8Supermarket and convenience store D11(0.115 6)0.014 8Leisure place D12(0.078 9)0.010 1Neighborhood relationship C3Familiarity D13(0.5)0.039 2(0.078 4)Help each other D14(0.5)0.039 2Support measures C4(0.400 3)Support measures D15(0.5)0.200 2Whether the support is in line with the actual situation D16(0.5)0.200 2

    Table2Satisfactionofrelocatedfarmers

    ProvinceNumber of peopleSatisfaction mean1≤Y<22≤Y<33≤Y<44≤Y<5Y≥5Hubei2093.9601.90%52.63%44.98%0.49%Hunan1304.2903.08%26.92%62.31%7.69%Total3394.0802.37%42.77%51.62%3.24%

    3.2.2Influencing factors. (i) Individual characteristic variables of farmers. The individual characteristic variables of farmers mainly include age, gender, health status, marital status and years of schooling. Most of the relocated population lived in the mountainous areas, and the living environment and living conditions were poor. Young people could obtain more resources for survival and development through relocation, so the satisfaction is higher. The elderly are mainly engaged in farming. After relocation to other places, the cultivated land may be far away, leading to inconvenient production, which will reduce the satisfaction of the elderly with the relocation policies. In addition, young people are more capable of accepting new things than older people, and they are able to integrate into a new living environment faster. Farmers of different genders play different roles in family life and social production. Therefore, there may be differences in the level of attention and evaluation of policies. After the merger of administrative villages or the withdrawal of townships, the medical and health room has become far away from farmers, and seeing a doctor becomes more difficult for the farmers. By relocation, the farmers moved to a central village close to the clinic, so someone that is in poor health, or has a chronic illness or an emergency, may be highly satisfied with theexsituanti-poverty relocation policies. Generally speaking, married people usually have higher housing satisfaction[8], so their relocation satisfaction is not low. The level of education plays a decisive role in the knowledge and ability of workforce. Therefore, farmers with different levels of education may have different views on the relocation policies. Farmers with higher education have strong non-agricultural skills, and they are more inclined to engage in non-agricultural industries and need more employment development opportunities. Therefore, they tend to have higher satisfaction with the relocation policies. It is expected that the two have a proportional relationship[9].

    (ii) Family characteristic variables. The family characteristic variables mainly include household per capita income, degree of concurrent employment, grade difference, distance from the relocation site to the recent market,etc. Generally speaking, the higher the income of the family is, the higher the requirements for production and living conditions are. After the relocation, the production and living conditions of the farmers have been improved, so the satisfaction is higher. The labor force of the families with low level of concurrent employment is mainly engaged in non-agricultural industries. Land income is no longer the main source of household income. The original residences are generally remote with congested traffic and poor living conditions. In contrast, the relocation sites are close to towns and have convenient transportation, more labor opportunities, so farmers are more willing to move out[10]. In our society, some groups are on the top floor, while others are on the ground floor. It is divided into 10 grades from the lowest level to the highest level. The relocation grade level minus the original grade level is the difference. The greater the grade difference is, the higher the satisfaction is. The closer the distance to the nearest market is, the more convenient the farmer’s life is, and the higher the satisfaction is.

    (iii) Relocation policy variables. The relocation policy variables mainly include resettlement methods, construction methods, traffic distance before and after relocation (that is, the distance of transportation from the original residence to the relocation site), whether the resettlement houses can be rented and remodeled, and relocation policy negotiation. The resettlement methods include centralized resettlement and scattered resettlement. The housing construction methods include unified planning and unified construction, unified planning and self construction, decentralized self construction and purchase of commercial housing. From the data point of view, the survey area only has two construction methods, unified planning and unified construction, and unified planning and self construction, In terms of relocation distance, if the relocation site is too far away from the original residence, it may cause inconvenience to farmers to increase their farming costs, and cause the original social network to be disrupted, forcing relocated farmers to face new social capital construction problems in the relocation site. These problems will lead to a decline in relocation satisfaction[11].Exsituanti-poverty relocation is a complex system project. Poor farmers, as support object, affect the process of resource allocation and the promotion of poverty alleviation[12]. In the process of policy implementation, expanding the participation of farmers in policy implementation and negotiation has a significant positive impact on farmers’ policy satisfaction[13]. Therefore, the number of relocation-related propaganda and mobilization activities that the county, township and village organizations have organized is selected in this study as the proxy variable for investigating the degree of consultation on the anti-poverty relocation policies. In addition, whether the resettlement hosing can be rented, remodeled,etc. may has an impact on the satisfaction of the farmers with theexsituanti-poverty relocation policies.

    (iv) Support policy variables. Support policy variables refer to the policy assistance measures currently being implemented by the government. This paper mainly examines the poverty alleviation policies that have a greater impact, such as poverty alleviation microfinance and industrial development projects. Poverty alleviation microfinance is a poverty alleviation loan product tailored to poor households to obtain development funds. It mainly provides poverty alleviation loans to poor households with a loan less than 50 000 yuan, less than three years, no guarantee, no mortgage, benchmark interest rate lending, fiscal interest subsidy and county-level risk compensation. To a certain extent, poverty alleviation microfinance can alleviate the financial constraints of poor farmers’ development[12]. Industrial development projects include development of poverty alleviation industries such as crop farming, aquaculture and rural tourism. Industrial poverty alleviation is a proven initiative to help poor households achieve poverty alleviation.

    3.2.3Model selection. Referring to existing research, to avoid the "linear" effects of individual characteristics on the dependent variable in the model and avoid the identification problem[14], the satisfaction evaluation of the relocated farmers involved in theexsituanti-poverty relocation is regarded as an ordered multi-category variable. Combined with the specific calculation results of the overall satisfaction, there is

    Therefore, this paper uses the multi-variate ordered logit model to analyze the influencing factors of the relocated farmers’ satisfaction. The basic form of the multi-variate ordered logit model is as follows:

    where,prepresents the probability that the farmer is satisfied with theexsituanti-poverty relocation policies;Xirepresents the factor that affects the satisfaction of relocated farmers;βirepresents the extent and direction of the influence of each independent variable on the dependent variable.

    According to the above basic model, the empirical model is obtained as follows:

    PSi-αXI+μ

    where,PSrepresents the policy satisfaction variable of the relocated farmer;Xrepresents the independent variables, mainly including individual characteristic variables of farmers, family characteristic variables, relocation policy variables, and support policy variables. The data is shown in Table 3.

    4 Model estimation results and analysis

    4.1ModelestimationresultsThe estimation results of the measurement model for the factors affecting the satisfaction of theexsituanti-poverty relocated farmers are shown in Table 4. The regression 1 and regression 2 are the estimated results of the ordered logit model. As this paper focuses on the impact of relocation characteristics and policy characteristics on relocated farmer’s satisfaction, the regression 1 only includes the relocation characteristic variables and policy characteristic variables. The regression 2 adds the individual characteristic variables and family characteristic variables on the basis of regression 1. In contrast, the regression 3 estimates all explanatory variables using the ordinary least squares method. As shown in Table 4, the estimation results of the ordered logit model and ordinary least squares are very close. The sign of each explanatory variable coefficient estimate is basically the same. Before and after the control variable, the saliency of relocation characteristics and policy characteristics is almost unchanged. At the same time, the model passes the multicollinearity test. The variances of maximum expansion factor and minimum tolerance are 1.425 and 0.702, respectively. All of them are within reasonable ranges, indicating that the estimation results of this paper have strong robustness. Taking the results of the ordered logit model regression 2 as an example, the impact of each explanatory variable on the satisfaction of farmers with theexsituanti-poverty relocation is analyzed.

    Table3Variabledefinitionanddescriptivestatistics

    Variable typeVariable nameVariable definitionMinimumMaximumMeanStandarddeviationFarmer individual AgeActual age (years)158354.5912.28characteristic variablesGenderMale=1, female=0010.660.47Health statusHealthy=1, others=0010.450.50Marital statusMarried=1, others=0010.750.44Years of schoolingDuration of formal education (years)0144.773.23Family characteristic Per capita incomeHousehold per capita income (1 000 yuan)-0.3950.855.915.39variablesDegree of concurrent employmentHousehold agricultural population/(house-hold agricultural population+1)00.80.370.22Grade differenceGrade difference between relocation site and original residence-591.522.04Distance from relocation site to the nearest marketTransportation distance from relocation site to the nearest market (km)0406.276.93Relocation policyvariablesRelocation methodsCentralized resettlement=1, scattered reset-tlement=0010.870.33Construction methodsUnified planning and unified construction=1, unified planning and self construction=0010.740.44Distance from relocation site to original residenceTransportation distance from relocation site to original residence (km)0302.763.26Whether resettlement housing can be rentedYes=1, no=0010.180.38Whether resettlement housing can be remodeledYes=1, no=0010.390.49Number of relocation-related meet-ings organized by county, township and village Number of activities organized by the county, township, and village to promote the mobili-zation and plan collection of relocation0305.413.94Support policyvariablesWhether to participate in poverty alleviation microfinanceYes=1, no=0010.420.49Whether to participate in industrial development project supported by the governmentYes=1, no=0010.420.49

    Table4Modelestimationandresultsoffactorsinfluencingsatisfactionofrelocatedfarmers

    Independent variablesRegression 1(ordered logit)Regression 2(ordered logit)Regression 3(OLS)Age-0.023(0.012)0.005(0.003)Gender-0.236(0.283)0.041(0.060)Health status-0.252(0.265)0.053(0.058)Marital status-0.375(0.305)0.090(0.066)Years of schooling--0.153(0.045)-0.033(0.010)Per capita income-0.025(0.027)0.003(0.005)Degree of concurrent employment-0.370(0.592)0.067(0.128)Grade difference-0.070(0.076)0.013(0.015)Distance from relocation site to the nearest market-0.020(0.017)0.014(0.008)Resettlement method0.834(0.368)0.762(0.394)0.151(0.087)Construction method-1.018(0.319)-1.042(0.352)-0.215(0.071)Distance from relocation site to original residence0.030(0.037)0.061(0.040)0.004(0.004)Whether resettlement housing can be rented -0.074(0.302)0.273(0.324)0.062(0.073)Whether resettlement housing can be remodeled-0.209(0.242)-0.193(0.257)-0.031(0.056)Number of relocation meetings organized by county, township and village0.092(0.040)0.091(0.043)0.016(0.007)Whether to participate in poverty alleviation microfinance0.287(0.245)0.627(0.273)0.138(0.058)Whether to participate in industrial development project supported by government0.970(0.259)1.010(0.280)0.212(0.060)Constant term--2.207(0.215)Sample size339339339Log likelihood value447434-Quasi R2 or R20.1160.1810.239

    Note:*,**and***indicate significant differences at the levels of 10%, 5% and 1%, respectively.

    4.2Interpretationofestimatedresults

    4.2.1Farmer individual characteristics and family characteristics. Among the farmer individual characteristics and family characteristics, only age and years of schooling have a significant impact on the satisfaction of relocated farmers, while other factors have no significant impact on the satisfaction of relocated farmers. The impact of the number of years of education on the satisfaction of relocated farmers is not in line with expectations. That is, as the number of years of education increases, the satisfaction of farmers is reduced. This may be because that the knowledge of farmers with higher education is higher, and they have stricter policy requirements and are not easily satisfied. It also explains the importance of negotiating with farmers during policy implementation. The farmers’ age coefficient is positive, indicating that farmers who are older are more satisfied with theexsituanti-poverty relocation. On one hand, as individuals grow older, they will adjust their evaluation of policies and lower their expectations, so they are more likely to be satisfied with the relocation policies. On the other hand, among the survey samples, the older the farmer is, the lower the education period is. Among farmers with an average age of 55 years and older, the farmers with maximum education period of 5 years account for about 14%, and the uneducated farmers account for about 37%. Therefore, age has a significant positive impact on the satisfaction of farmers withexsituanti-poverty relocation. However, the impact of per capita income on the satisfaction of farmers with relocation is not significant. This may be because that the samples surveyed are all poor households with established files and registered cards, and the per capita income of the households is at a low level. The difference in the social rank of the farmers between original residence and relocation site has no significant impact on the satisfaction of farmers withexsituanti-poverty relocation. The possible explanation is that although theexsituanti-poverty relocation policies have improved the living environment of poor households and improved their production conditions, it cannot improve the social rank of poor households in the short term. This requires the development of follow-up support policies to improve the "hematopoietic" function of the poor households.

    4.2.2Relocation policies. The construction methods of resettlers, resettlement methods and the number of relocation meetings organized by the government have a significant impact on the satisfaction of theexsituanti-poverty relocated farmers. Farmers with centralized resettlement have higher satisfaction. This may be due to the fact that compared with scattered settlement, centralized resettlement has relatively complete infrastructure and service facilities, and it can effectively improve the living environment of poor households, meeting the basic needs of the relocated farmers for poverty alleviation and resettlement[15-16]. In terms of the way of resettlement houses are constructed, the farmers under the mode of unified planning and self construction have higher satisfaction with theexsituanti-poverty relocation. The unified planning and self construction mode can ensure the construction of infrastructure and public service facilities in the resettlement area and improve the participation of farmers in theexsituanti-poverty relocation. Therefore, farmers who participate in this type of construction have higher satisfaction. The number of relocation meetings organized by the government has a significant positive impact on the satisfaction of farmers withexsituanti-poverty relocation. When implementing theexsituanti-poverty relocation policies, more village meetings can significantly improve farmers’ satisfaction.

    4.2.3Support policies. The estimated coefficients of "whether to participate in poverty alleviation microfinance" and "whether to participate in government-supported industrial development projects" are significantly positive. It indicates that the follow-up support policies have had a significant impact on the satisfaction of farmers withexsituanti-poverty relocation.

    5 Conclusions and discussion

    On the basis of the survey data of relocated farmers in Hubei and Hunan provinces in 2017, this paper conducts a comprehensive analysis on the specific satisfaction levels of relocated farmers in the two provinces and the influencing factors. The study finds that the satisfaction ofexsituanti-poverty relocated farmers is obviously affected by the relocation polices and support policies. Even after controlling the individual characteristic variables and family characteristic variables, the relocation policies and support policies still have a significant impact on the satisfaction of farmers with theexsituanti-poverty relocation, indicating that the relocated farmers of different backgrounds have a similar understanding on the satisfaction withexsituanti-poverty relocation.

    Considering the specific influencing factors of the satisfaction of relocated farmers, in the implementation process of theexsituanti-poverty relocation policies, consultation with farmers from a realistic perspective can effectively improve the policy satisfaction of farmers and improve the quality of policy implementation. On the basis of strict control standards, it is necessary to formulate resettlement housing construction methods according to specific requirements of households. The resettlement methods should be dominated by centralized resettlement, supplemented by scattered resettlement. The sense of participation of the relocated households should be increased. Finally, the follow-up support policies after the relocation should be strengthened. The form of "cooperative+" can be adopted to develop poverty alleviation industries to ensure stable poverty alleviation.

    亚洲中文av在线| 日本欧美视频一区| 国产精品久久久久久精品古装| 亚洲国产欧美在线一区| 亚洲人成电影免费在线| 精品少妇黑人巨大在线播放| 黑人巨大精品欧美一区二区蜜桃| 午夜久久久在线观看| 国产精品久久电影中文字幕 | 美女国产高潮福利片在线看| 麻豆国产av国片精品| 欧美黑人欧美精品刺激| 精品国产一区二区三区久久久樱花| 涩涩av久久男人的天堂| 不卡av一区二区三区| av超薄肉色丝袜交足视频| 人人妻,人人澡人人爽秒播| 国产一卡二卡三卡精品| 日韩三级视频一区二区三区| 中文亚洲av片在线观看爽 | 男女免费视频国产| 久久99一区二区三区| 国产午夜精品久久久久久| 一边摸一边抽搐一进一小说 | 国产午夜精品久久久久久| 搡老岳熟女国产| 麻豆成人av在线观看| 亚洲国产毛片av蜜桃av| 波多野结衣av一区二区av| 窝窝影院91人妻| 后天国语完整版免费观看| 国产不卡av网站在线观看| www.自偷自拍.com| 国产一区有黄有色的免费视频| 国产老妇伦熟女老妇高清| 亚洲一区中文字幕在线| 国产在线一区二区三区精| 美女午夜性视频免费| 90打野战视频偷拍视频| 国产国语露脸激情在线看| 国产精品 欧美亚洲| 黄色怎么调成土黄色| 菩萨蛮人人尽说江南好唐韦庄| 亚洲av片天天在线观看| 麻豆成人av在线观看| 国产精品一区二区免费欧美| 一夜夜www| 免费女性裸体啪啪无遮挡网站| 黑人巨大精品欧美一区二区蜜桃| 欧美 日韩 精品 国产| 热99久久久久精品小说推荐| 色精品久久人妻99蜜桃| 色尼玛亚洲综合影院| 黑人操中国人逼视频| www.自偷自拍.com| 宅男免费午夜| 欧美日韩中文字幕国产精品一区二区三区 | 亚洲精品国产一区二区精华液| 18禁裸乳无遮挡动漫免费视频| 亚洲七黄色美女视频| 欧美成狂野欧美在线观看| 欧美乱妇无乱码| 国产成人欧美在线观看 | 一二三四在线观看免费中文在| 一夜夜www| 欧美激情极品国产一区二区三区| 精品国内亚洲2022精品成人 | 国产精品香港三级国产av潘金莲| 新久久久久国产一级毛片| 亚洲欧洲精品一区二区精品久久久| 亚洲中文日韩欧美视频| 伊人久久大香线蕉亚洲五| 午夜福利免费观看在线| 黄片大片在线免费观看| 一级片'在线观看视频| 丁香六月欧美| 老司机在亚洲福利影院| 国产欧美日韩一区二区三| 免费观看人在逋| 麻豆国产av国片精品| 久久精品国产99精品国产亚洲性色 | 中文亚洲av片在线观看爽 | 51午夜福利影视在线观看| 免费观看a级毛片全部| 欧美大码av| 欧美乱码精品一区二区三区| 久久热在线av| 变态另类成人亚洲欧美熟女 | 亚洲欧美日韩高清在线视频 | 人人妻人人添人人爽欧美一区卜| av网站在线播放免费| 成人18禁在线播放| 手机成人av网站| 中文字幕高清在线视频| 国产免费视频播放在线视频| 一区福利在线观看| 女性被躁到高潮视频| 老熟妇乱子伦视频在线观看| 国产欧美日韩一区二区三区在线| 自线自在国产av| 超碰97精品在线观看| 超碰97精品在线观看| 黑人巨大精品欧美一区二区蜜桃| 在线观看一区二区三区激情| 国产高清激情床上av| 国产又爽黄色视频| 黑人猛操日本美女一级片| 成人18禁高潮啪啪吃奶动态图| 国产亚洲精品久久久久5区| 国产免费福利视频在线观看| 香蕉国产在线看| 亚洲精华国产精华精| 国产在线一区二区三区精| 欧美在线黄色| 肉色欧美久久久久久久蜜桃| 久久精品亚洲av国产电影网| www.精华液| 国产成+人综合+亚洲专区| av免费在线观看网站| 在线观看免费视频网站a站| 亚洲av第一区精品v没综合| 五月开心婷婷网| 国产精品.久久久| 欧美人与性动交α欧美精品济南到| 一区二区av电影网| 日韩大片免费观看网站| 黄网站色视频无遮挡免费观看| 国产欧美亚洲国产| 丝瓜视频免费看黄片| 大片电影免费在线观看免费| 久久久久视频综合| 国产亚洲午夜精品一区二区久久| 亚洲成人手机| 97人妻天天添夜夜摸| 亚洲成人免费电影在线观看| 国产高清国产精品国产三级| 在线十欧美十亚洲十日本专区| 国产在线一区二区三区精| 成人免费观看视频高清| 欧美午夜高清在线| 如日韩欧美国产精品一区二区三区| 美女高潮喷水抽搐中文字幕| 欧美亚洲 丝袜 人妻 在线| 免费av中文字幕在线| svipshipincom国产片| 日韩一区二区三区影片| 久久婷婷成人综合色麻豆| 欧美黄色片欧美黄色片| 天天添夜夜摸| 五月开心婷婷网| 色精品久久人妻99蜜桃| 亚洲色图综合在线观看| 男女午夜视频在线观看| 香蕉丝袜av| 国产视频一区二区在线看| 黄色成人免费大全| 啦啦啦视频在线资源免费观看| 中文字幕高清在线视频| 国产aⅴ精品一区二区三区波| 国产国语露脸激情在线看| 久久久久国产一级毛片高清牌| 天天躁日日躁夜夜躁夜夜| 亚洲欧美精品综合一区二区三区| 精品人妻1区二区| 久久国产精品男人的天堂亚洲| 妹子高潮喷水视频| 激情视频va一区二区三区| 91大片在线观看| 久久 成人 亚洲| 久久精品国产综合久久久| 欧美成人午夜精品| 国产不卡av网站在线观看| 夜夜爽天天搞| 国产精品欧美亚洲77777| 黄色视频在线播放观看不卡| 欧美 日韩 精品 国产| 久久久久精品人妻al黑| 露出奶头的视频| 免费人妻精品一区二区三区视频| 色综合欧美亚洲国产小说| 亚洲人成伊人成综合网2020| 中文字幕精品免费在线观看视频| 精品国产乱子伦一区二区三区| 九色亚洲精品在线播放| 怎么达到女性高潮| 久久婷婷成人综合色麻豆| 久久天堂一区二区三区四区| 精品福利永久在线观看| 午夜成年电影在线免费观看| 水蜜桃什么品种好| 国产主播在线观看一区二区| 亚洲国产欧美日韩在线播放| 一二三四在线观看免费中文在| 亚洲视频免费观看视频| 搡老岳熟女国产| 精品乱码久久久久久99久播| 极品教师在线免费播放| 国产精品成人在线| 午夜成年电影在线免费观看| 亚洲情色 制服丝袜| 国产aⅴ精品一区二区三区波| 看免费av毛片| 妹子高潮喷水视频| 1024香蕉在线观看| 18在线观看网站| 正在播放国产对白刺激| 无人区码免费观看不卡 | 久久精品亚洲av国产电影网| 丰满人妻熟妇乱又伦精品不卡| 最新美女视频免费是黄的| 侵犯人妻中文字幕一二三四区| 91字幕亚洲| 久久精品人人爽人人爽视色| 欧美激情 高清一区二区三区| 一夜夜www| 日韩大码丰满熟妇| 18在线观看网站| 国产在线精品亚洲第一网站| 不卡一级毛片| 亚洲熟妇熟女久久| 国产精品免费一区二区三区在线 | 极品教师在线免费播放| 麻豆乱淫一区二区| 丁香六月欧美| 热99国产精品久久久久久7| 欧美日韩国产mv在线观看视频| 亚洲综合色网址| 美国免费a级毛片| 精品福利观看| 宅男免费午夜| 波多野结衣一区麻豆| 啦啦啦视频在线资源免费观看| 丰满少妇做爰视频| av欧美777| 宅男免费午夜| 男人操女人黄网站| 丝袜美足系列| 美女午夜性视频免费| 在线看a的网站| 自拍欧美九色日韩亚洲蝌蚪91| 丰满少妇做爰视频| 国产精品一区二区免费欧美| 妹子高潮喷水视频| 十八禁网站网址无遮挡| 精品一区二区三区四区五区乱码| 国精品久久久久久国模美| 99久久99久久久精品蜜桃| 无遮挡黄片免费观看| 久久国产精品大桥未久av| 人妻久久中文字幕网| 看免费av毛片| 精品午夜福利视频在线观看一区 | 欧美激情高清一区二区三区| 欧美日韩视频精品一区| 久久精品国产99精品国产亚洲性色 | 久久久久国产一级毛片高清牌| 亚洲午夜理论影院| 欧美精品高潮呻吟av久久| 黄色a级毛片大全视频| 国产97色在线日韩免费| 黑人欧美特级aaaaaa片| 国产在视频线精品| 最新美女视频免费是黄的| 日本黄色视频三级网站网址 | 自拍欧美九色日韩亚洲蝌蚪91| 国产99久久九九免费精品| 美女视频免费永久观看网站| 人人妻人人爽人人添夜夜欢视频| 性色av乱码一区二区三区2| 久久ye,这里只有精品| 欧美日韩精品网址| 色在线成人网| 91国产中文字幕| 黑人欧美特级aaaaaa片| 王馨瑶露胸无遮挡在线观看| 12—13女人毛片做爰片一| 精品乱码久久久久久99久播| 母亲3免费完整高清在线观看| 亚洲欧洲精品一区二区精品久久久| 欧美亚洲日本最大视频资源| 国产在线视频一区二区| 午夜精品久久久久久毛片777| 中文字幕色久视频| 一级毛片精品| 下体分泌物呈黄色| 我要看黄色一级片免费的| 精品一区二区三卡| 成人亚洲精品一区在线观看| av有码第一页| 欧美日韩一级在线毛片| 成人特级黄色片久久久久久久 | 精品久久久久久久毛片微露脸| 色精品久久人妻99蜜桃| 国产成人免费无遮挡视频| 国产高清视频在线播放一区| 国产一区二区三区综合在线观看| 精品免费久久久久久久清纯 | 9色porny在线观看| 777久久人妻少妇嫩草av网站| 伊人久久大香线蕉亚洲五| 在线观看免费视频网站a站| 久久婷婷成人综合色麻豆| 日韩视频在线欧美| 久久久精品免费免费高清| 99re6热这里在线精品视频| 一级片免费观看大全| 一本色道久久久久久精品综合| svipshipincom国产片| 两个人看的免费小视频| 中文字幕av电影在线播放| 热99国产精品久久久久久7| 久久久精品区二区三区| 久久中文看片网| 夜夜爽天天搞| 看免费av毛片| 美女视频免费永久观看网站| 最近最新中文字幕大全免费视频| 啦啦啦视频在线资源免费观看| tube8黄色片| 麻豆av在线久日| 欧美精品啪啪一区二区三区| 久久精品国产亚洲av高清一级| 免费在线观看日本一区| 国产精品香港三级国产av潘金莲| 桃花免费在线播放| 国产野战对白在线观看| 免费人妻精品一区二区三区视频| 午夜免费鲁丝| 女同久久另类99精品国产91| 天天躁狠狠躁夜夜躁狠狠躁| 欧美成狂野欧美在线观看| 久久久久久久久免费视频了| 国产精品亚洲一级av第二区| 十八禁网站免费在线| 99香蕉大伊视频| 亚洲 欧美一区二区三区| 午夜福利免费观看在线| 首页视频小说图片口味搜索| 一区二区三区激情视频| 日韩欧美一区二区三区在线观看 | 欧美人与性动交α欧美软件| 在线观看人妻少妇| 亚洲精品国产精品久久久不卡| 国产国语露脸激情在线看| 亚洲欧美日韩高清在线视频 | 天天躁狠狠躁夜夜躁狠狠躁| 国产精品自产拍在线观看55亚洲 | 日韩视频在线欧美| 中文欧美无线码| 人人妻人人添人人爽欧美一区卜| 91字幕亚洲| 老司机影院毛片| 99国产精品99久久久久| 人妻 亚洲 视频| 高清av免费在线| 国产一区二区三区视频了| 久久久久国内视频| 香蕉久久夜色| 一夜夜www| 精品少妇久久久久久888优播| 亚洲国产看品久久| 国产欧美日韩综合在线一区二区| 国产老妇伦熟女老妇高清| 99国产精品免费福利视频| 最新在线观看一区二区三区| 丝袜喷水一区| 男人操女人黄网站| 久久久久久久国产电影| avwww免费| 国产男女内射视频| 丝瓜视频免费看黄片| bbb黄色大片| 久热爱精品视频在线9| 中亚洲国语对白在线视频| 香蕉久久夜色| 亚洲七黄色美女视频| 色综合欧美亚洲国产小说| 国产又爽黄色视频| 最新的欧美精品一区二区| 一级黄色大片毛片| 中文字幕人妻丝袜一区二区| 2018国产大陆天天弄谢| 亚洲成国产人片在线观看| 男女免费视频国产| 国产成人啪精品午夜网站| 99久久99久久久精品蜜桃| 欧美老熟妇乱子伦牲交| 成人手机av| 久久精品亚洲精品国产色婷小说| 亚洲综合色网址| 成年版毛片免费区| 欧美在线黄色| 亚洲av欧美aⅴ国产| 中文字幕色久视频| 国产精品一区二区精品视频观看| 777久久人妻少妇嫩草av网站| 18禁裸乳无遮挡动漫免费视频| 日本av手机在线免费观看| 国产在线观看jvid| 久久狼人影院| 亚洲欧美日韩另类电影网站| 男女无遮挡免费网站观看| 午夜福利在线观看吧| 免费av中文字幕在线| 9热在线视频观看99| 美女午夜性视频免费| 免费人妻精品一区二区三区视频| 大码成人一级视频| 国产老妇伦熟女老妇高清| 91成人精品电影| 欧美激情极品国产一区二区三区| 丝袜人妻中文字幕| 午夜精品国产一区二区电影| 国产伦人伦偷精品视频| 熟女少妇亚洲综合色aaa.| 狠狠精品人妻久久久久久综合| 亚洲性夜色夜夜综合| 在线播放国产精品三级| 亚洲视频免费观看视频| 精品欧美一区二区三区在线| 欧美变态另类bdsm刘玥| 777米奇影视久久| 热99国产精品久久久久久7| 国产一区二区激情短视频| 久久人妻av系列| 十八禁网站免费在线| 国产片内射在线| 亚洲成人国产一区在线观看| 2018国产大陆天天弄谢| 他把我摸到了高潮在线观看 | 欧美性长视频在线观看| 亚洲九九香蕉| 欧美日韩精品网址| 亚洲av日韩在线播放| 午夜激情av网站| 一个人免费在线观看的高清视频| 国产日韩一区二区三区精品不卡| 精品亚洲成国产av| 国产精品亚洲av一区麻豆| 久久久久久久国产电影| 人人妻人人澡人人看| 亚洲国产成人一精品久久久| 在线av久久热| 成人国产一区最新在线观看| 高清av免费在线| 少妇精品久久久久久久| 国产麻豆69| 国产在线观看jvid| 亚洲色图 男人天堂 中文字幕| 国产老妇伦熟女老妇高清| 国产免费福利视频在线观看| 午夜福利视频精品| 他把我摸到了高潮在线观看 | 美女午夜性视频免费| 精品久久久久久电影网| 精品一区二区三卡| av又黄又爽大尺度在线免费看| 国产精品麻豆人妻色哟哟久久| 欧美人与性动交α欧美精品济南到| 久久久精品区二区三区| 国产黄频视频在线观看| 自线自在国产av| 亚洲天堂av无毛| 精品亚洲乱码少妇综合久久| 国产成人一区二区三区免费视频网站| 老熟女久久久| 欧美激情高清一区二区三区| 精品久久久精品久久久| 成人亚洲精品一区在线观看| 免费日韩欧美在线观看| 久久久久精品人妻al黑| 最近最新中文字幕大全电影3 | 亚洲国产av新网站| 国产野战对白在线观看| 国产男女内射视频| 国产真人三级小视频在线观看| 亚洲国产av影院在线观看| 久久久久久久国产电影| 国产成人欧美在线观看 | 变态另类成人亚洲欧美熟女 | 日韩三级视频一区二区三区| svipshipincom国产片| 日韩欧美国产一区二区入口| 亚洲欧美一区二区三区黑人| 丰满迷人的少妇在线观看| 国精品久久久久久国模美| 在线亚洲精品国产二区图片欧美| 亚洲伊人色综图| 久久人妻福利社区极品人妻图片| 最新的欧美精品一区二区| 亚洲av片天天在线观看| 男女午夜视频在线观看| 又大又爽又粗| 精品少妇内射三级| 亚洲精品粉嫩美女一区| 国精品久久久久久国模美| 欧美日本中文国产一区发布| 国产高清videossex| 丝瓜视频免费看黄片| tocl精华| 国精品久久久久久国模美| 在线 av 中文字幕| 激情视频va一区二区三区| 国产欧美日韩精品亚洲av| 国产精品久久久久久人妻精品电影 | 免费在线观看视频国产中文字幕亚洲| 成人国产一区最新在线观看| 99精品久久久久人妻精品| netflix在线观看网站| 黑丝袜美女国产一区| svipshipincom国产片| 欧美日韩亚洲高清精品| 制服诱惑二区| 国产片内射在线| 色老头精品视频在线观看| 精品国产一区二区三区四区第35| 亚洲五月婷婷丁香| 女人爽到高潮嗷嗷叫在线视频| 久久精品aⅴ一区二区三区四区| 日本撒尿小便嘘嘘汇集6| 中文亚洲av片在线观看爽 | www日本在线高清视频| avwww免费| 国产区一区二久久| 亚洲精品在线观看二区| 大型av网站在线播放| 女性被躁到高潮视频| 午夜福利一区二区在线看| 欧美乱妇无乱码| 欧美成人午夜精品| 国产精品自产拍在线观看55亚洲 | 欧美日韩av久久| 在线看a的网站| 久久久久久久久免费视频了| 日韩免费av在线播放| 免费观看a级毛片全部| 欧美性长视频在线观看| 三上悠亚av全集在线观看| av网站免费在线观看视频| 亚洲欧洲精品一区二区精品久久久| 男女午夜视频在线观看| 欧美精品人与动牲交sv欧美| 亚洲 欧美一区二区三区| 亚洲,欧美精品.| 夜夜夜夜夜久久久久| 97在线人人人人妻| 欧美日韩成人在线一区二区| 亚洲欧美激情在线| 精品国产一区二区三区久久久樱花| 亚洲欧美日韩高清在线视频 | 精品少妇内射三级| 国产深夜福利视频在线观看| 中文字幕人妻熟女乱码| 久久久精品区二区三区| 视频在线观看一区二区三区| 亚洲欧美激情在线| 最近最新中文字幕大全免费视频| 男男h啪啪无遮挡| 色在线成人网| 在线观看免费日韩欧美大片| 欧美精品啪啪一区二区三区| 精品一区二区三卡| 日韩成人在线观看一区二区三区| 国产精品国产高清国产av | 欧美日韩国产mv在线观看视频| 久久毛片免费看一区二区三区| 亚洲精品国产色婷婷电影| 丝袜在线中文字幕| 电影成人av| 又黄又粗又硬又大视频| 男女床上黄色一级片免费看| av天堂久久9| 精品一区二区三卡| 婷婷丁香在线五月| 老熟女久久久| 一级片'在线观看视频| 嫩草影视91久久| 日韩中文字幕视频在线看片| 免费看a级黄色片| 2018国产大陆天天弄谢| 国产又爽黄色视频| 久久ye,这里只有精品| 久久精品aⅴ一区二区三区四区| 在线观看免费日韩欧美大片| 我要看黄色一级片免费的| 免费高清在线观看日韩| www日本在线高清视频| 国产有黄有色有爽视频| 老司机在亚洲福利影院| 91av网站免费观看| www.熟女人妻精品国产| 99精品欧美一区二区三区四区| 久久久精品免费免费高清| 久久中文字幕一级| 中文字幕av电影在线播放| 亚洲av电影在线进入| 久久国产精品人妻蜜桃| 十八禁高潮呻吟视频| 一进一出抽搐动态| 亚洲午夜精品一区,二区,三区| 久久中文字幕一级| 午夜久久久在线观看| 欧美 日韩 精品 国产| 亚洲熟女精品中文字幕| 99国产精品一区二区三区| 在线观看免费日韩欧美大片| 久久久久网色| 亚洲中文av在线| 丰满少妇做爰视频| 亚洲人成77777在线视频| 亚洲精品一卡2卡三卡4卡5卡| 人人妻人人澡人人爽人人夜夜| 亚洲专区字幕在线| 极品教师在线免费播放| 手机成人av网站|