• <tr id="yyy80"></tr>
  • <sup id="yyy80"></sup>
  • <tfoot id="yyy80"><noscript id="yyy80"></noscript></tfoot>
  • 99热精品在线国产_美女午夜性视频免费_国产精品国产高清国产av_av欧美777_自拍偷自拍亚洲精品老妇_亚洲熟女精品中文字幕_www日本黄色视频网_国产精品野战在线观看 ?

    The process of transprofessional collaboration: how caregivers integrated the perspectives of rehabilitation through working with a physical therapist

    2021-01-12 07:44:08RyoheiGotoJunjiHaruta
    Family Medicine and Community Health 2020年4期
    關鍵詞:頁面檢索語義

    Ryohei Goto , Junji Haruta

    ABSTRACT

    Objectives To clarify the process of how caregivers in a nursing home integrate the perspectives of rehabilitation into their responsibilities through working with a physical therapist.

    Design This study was conducted under an action research approach.

    Setting The target facility was a nursing home located in Japan. The researcher, a physical therapist, worked at the nursing home once a week from April 2016 to March 2017. During the study period, he created field notes focused on the dialogue and action of caregivers regarding care, responses of caregivers to the physical therapist and reflections as a physical therapist. Caregivers were also given a short informal interview about their relationship with the nursing home residents. For data analysis, two researchers discussed the content based on the field notes, consolidating the findings.

    Participants The participants were caregivers who worked at the target facility. Thirty- eight caregivers agreed to participate. Average age was 39.6±11.1 years, 14 (37%) were male and average caregiver experience was 9.8 years.

    Results Two cycles of action research were conducted during the study period. There were four stages in the process of how caregivers in the nursing home integrated the perspectives of rehabilitation through their work with the physical therapist. First, caregivers resisted having the rehabilitation programme carried out in the unit because they perceived that rehabilitation performed by a physical therapist was a special process and not under their responsibility. However, the caregivers were given a shared perspective on rehabilitation by the physical therapist, which helped them to understand the meaning of care to adapt the residents’ abilities to their daily life. They practised resident- centred care on a trial basis, although with a sense of conflict between their new and previous role, which emphasised the safety of residents’ lives and personhood. The caregivers increased their self- efficacy as their knowledge and skills were supplemented by the physical therapist and his approval of their attempted care. They were then able to commit to their newly conceived specialty of care as a means of supporting the lives of residents.

    INTRODUCTION

    The need for interprofessional collaboration (IPC)1in healthcare is increasing in line with the increasing number of elderly people who are susceptible to the adverse effects of disease on activities of daily living (ADLs).23Interestingly, however, even as the roles of the various healthcare professions have become clearer due to specialisation, the boundaries between professions have begun to collapse. Particularly, in developed countries, where the number of elderly is increasing,4demand for medical and nursing care exceeds supply. As a result, IPC that does not induce individuals to grow beyond the role of their own profession will fail to provide sufficient services. Overcoming this requires transprofessional collaboration (TPC),15in which professional boundaries are blurred or disappear to allow the deliberate exchange of knowledge and skills aimed at meeting complex healthcare needs. Previous findings have confirmed that healthcare professionals should transcend traditional disciplinary boundaries in communities where human resources for medical care are scarce.6Thus, it is anticipated that many developed countries currently experiencing an ongoing relative lack of human resources for medical care will require TPC.

    One type of institution with a clear need for TPC is nursing homes in Japan. The number of medical professionals such as doctors, nurses and physical therapists in these centres is limited, and ‘caring’ is primarily provided by a limited number of caregivers. Watson7defines caring as: ‘the moral ideal of nursing whereby the end is protection, enhancement, and preservation of human dignity’. In Japan, however, many caregivers do not receive systematic higher education in caring. It may also be that they tend to capture the meaning of caring as ‘work’, rather than the concept of caring, as many nursing homes have inadequate education systems for caregivers. Furthermore, caregivers may regard residents as objects of work, rather than perceive their personhood, meaning recognising them as persons.8Caregivers play the major role in the lives of residents and are originally required to adopt the rehabilitation perspective of ‘helping disabled individuals to perform their functions as much as possible and integrate them into society’.9However, caregivers tend to focus on their ‘work’, and in doing so tend to provide residents with excessive help in performing their ADL. Consequently, their help sometimes leads to a converse decrease in the residents’ ADL. The number of nursing homes serving as residences for elderly people needing care is increasing,1011and the cultivation of caregivers who appreciate the perspective of rehabilitation by rehabilitation therapists in supporting the lives of residents is expected to increase. To cultivate these caregivers, they may learn the meaning of care on the job by receiving education and by being encouraged by and receiving feedback from other professionals with whom they collaborate.

    Although TPC is generally required when practitioners step into specialised areas in which they have not previously worked, the process can result in much anxiety and conflict. Indeed, regarding IPC, studies have reported that conflict among professional roles has caused decreases in job satisfaction,12as well as friction, clashes and collision.13–15In addition, conflict management mode choices among physicians and nurses for dealing with their conflict have been reported.16The role ambiguity between health professions elicited by TPC is expected to evoke even greater resistance and conflict than IPC.

    The resistance and conflict that arose during the process of TPC and transformation of caregivers through working together in this study reflected the theoretical framework of transformative learning developed by Mezirow.17Transformative learning is ‘the process of learning that forms beliefs and opinions that justify behavior by changing the conforming frame of cognition (meaning perspective) which has been taken for granted’. Mezirow noted that the process of transformation begins with the ‘confusion- causing dilemma’ and presented a communication called ‘rational discourse’ that is reflective and presupposes the intervention of reason as conducive to transformative learning. The present study uses this theoretical framework of transformative learning.

    Although previous studies have investigated collaboration between caregivers and nurses to improve the quality of caring in a nursing home,18as well as between family caregivers and nurses in a home care setting,19collaboration between caregivers and physical therapists has not yet been reported. Furthermore, other reports have described transprofessional education (TPE) processes by healthcare professions and lay people,20along with the need for various professions to work as transprofessional teams in providing home healthcare.21However, TPC processes conducted among clinical professions have not been clarified.

    In this research, a physical therapist engaged as a practitioner and researcher at a nursing home in Japan worked with caregivers to encourage them to integrate the perspectives of rehabilitation into the fixed role of caregivers. Here, we report the process of how the caregivers integrated the perspectives of rehabilitation through working with the physical therapist. The findings of this study will help in managing the implementation and practice of TPC and clarify the significance of viewing the phenomenon from the perspective of both practitioner and researcher.

    METHODS

    Study design

    This study used the participatory action research approach,22which focuses on action and change. The primary characteristic of action research is the use of cycles aimed at meeting identified needs. The process steps are diagnosing and analysing problems, planning, implementing/taking action and evaluating. After the evaluation, a new cycle can start based on the new situation.22This research’s key issue was investigating the practicability of voluntary and stress- free care of nursing home residents by caregivers that aimed to help residents improve their ADL capacities via the integration of rehabilitation perspectives into routine nursing care. The present study aimed to clarify the process used to resolve this issue by using the action research method. The lead author participated in the study by working with caregivers as a physical therapist and researcher.

    Study setting

    The setting was a special nursing home located in Ibaraki Prefecture, Japan. The facility accommodates a maximum of 70 residents. As of 2016, it housed 70 residents and employed 38 caregivers and 3 nurses full time, and two regular doctors (for 2 days a week). Compared with other types of nursing facilities, this facility’s residents required significant assistance in ADL, such as eating, toileting and bathing. Residents of special nursing homes in Japan receive a wide range of such care services at relatively low cost, and many caregivers working there are non- certified.

    The facility was selected for this study for two reasons. First, it had only been open for about 2 years and had built little organisational culture around itself. We therefore considered that it would be easier for the staff and organisation to change without being bound by organisational customs. Second, the facility had not previously employed rehabilitation professionals, which we expected would minimise prejudice and facilitate observation of the process of change following new collaboration with the physical therapist.

    The participants were caregivers who worked at the target facility and understood the objectives of the study. The lead author (RG), who worked with them as a physical therapist, is a male with 8 years of experience has a PhD. RG commenced working at the facility 1 day a week The coauthor (JH) is a general practitioner who received training in qualitative research as part of a PhD programme. JH had previously worked at this facility as a commissioned doctor once a week for a 2- year period in 2015–2016.

    Data collection and analysis

    RG worked once a week at the target facility from April 2016 to March 2017. He created field notes focusing on dialogue and action by the caregivers in their provision of caring, responses of caregivers in relation to the physical therapist and his reflections as a physical therapist. Caregivers were also given a short informal interview about their relationship with the nursing home residents. A structured interview guide was not used as the interview content differed depending on the situation. Furthermore, to record natural conversation by a caregiver at work, the conversations were not recorded via audio recorders.

    Observation records were checked with caregivers to ensure that the data interpretation was valid and accurate. The record texts were shared by RG with JH. RG and JH then repeated the discussion based on the text, evaluating and reflecting on the changes in caregivers as a result of working with the physical therapist. In addition, through the action research during the study period, they consolidated the findings to develop a model of ‘the process by which caregivers in a nursing home integrated the perspectives of rehabilitation through working with a physical therapist’.

    The researcher (RG), a physical therapist, tried to maintain a balance between ‘involvement’ as a practitioner and ‘detachment’ as a researcher. Nevertheless, it was difficult to exclude the possibility of a bias in the recording of field notes and analysis of data because the researcher as a physical therapist was motivated to facilitate changes in caregivers’ perceptions and behaviours. In an attempt to minimise such bias, RG periodically shared the records with JH, a coresearcher who is familiar with the institution, to obtain feedback from the perspective of an outsider.

    RESULTS

    Two cycles of action research were conducted during the study period.

    Cycle 1

    Diagnosing the problem

    Caregiver characteristics and their work in this facility

    The facility examined in this study employed 38 caregivers who agreed to participate in the study. Average age was 39.6±11.1 years, and 14 (37%) were male. Caregiver experience ranged from 1 to 26 years, with an average of 9.8 years. They worked in a total of seven units.

    The caregivers in this facility are constantly busy caring for the nursing home residents and have little time to rest. Their role involves serving breakfast and encouraging toileting after breakfast. Thereafter, the caregivers rostered for bathing help residents bathe and ensure that they drink water, before putting them to bed for a rest. These tasks are often not completed until close to lunch time. When residents require additional care, these tasks take longer to complete. Caregivers do not have institutional mobile phones, neither is a board- type nurse call system available, so locating residents who push the nurse call button for toileting assistance often takes time. Despite their busy schedules, the caregivers are responsible for keeping residents safe. They pay particular attention to ensuring that they perform their tasks safely so that, for example, residents do not fall or develop bedsores. However, if the work of a caregiver is delayed, the nurses point this out. Caregivers are therefore averse to having their work delayed and tend to act aggressively towards residents who do not follow their instructions or are demanding. Nurses also routinely proposed ideas for improvement of nursing practices to the caregivers; however, the caregivers occasionally interpreted these ideas as unsuitable for the lifestyle preferences of the residents or nursing procedures of the caregivers, or even considered them impracticable given their heavy workload. Such negative responses from the caregivers were not frequent but were highly noticeable, such that the nurses often complained by saying, ‘the caregivers are uninterested in change, no matter how many times we suggest something to them’.

    The residents’ daily schedule includes exercise or a recreational programme. However, many residents sleep through the programme in a wheelchair while the dull sounds of the video exercise programme permeate the unit as caregivers change the bed linens nearby. This is not the kind of caring that encourages independence. Of course, caregivers are not always busy with their tasks. In some units, caregivers clap their hands while singing songs with the residents.

    Rehabilitation perceived by caregivers

    When the physical therapist visited t he units, the caregivers cheerfully greeted the researcher. They would say to the residents, ‘Mr. A, here comes the physical therapist’. Caregivers appreciated that the rehabilitation would be performed outside the unit. During rehabilitation, a resident said that ‘they were happy to be able to participate in such a special programme’. Once a rehabilitation session was over, a caregiver announced ‘that’s the end of the rehabilitation session’ to the resident and physical therapist when the resident returned to the unit. A caregiver said,Would you put the cane away? …(Omitted)… You can practice walking only during the rehabilitation session with the physical therapist. Don’t ever think that you can practice walking in the unit. If you fall, it is we who will be blamed for the fall. (Caregivers)From these words and actions, it was considered that caregivers recognised the rehabilitation performed by the physical therapist as a special activity and felt that the safety of the residents was not their responsibility while undergoing the rehabilitation session. Therefore, they did not like having the residents undergo the rehabilitation programme in the unit.

    Plan

    The physical therapist regarded the rehabilitation session as something that would maintain and improve the abilities of residents who required rehabilitation in their daily lives and be a way to help them adapt the abilities that they did retain to their ADL environment. With this understanding in mind, the physical therapist felt the need to communicate his idea to the caregivers that rehabilitation was not a special service, but rather a part of the life of residents that should naturally be included in the caregivers’ tasks. However, the physical therapist inferred that the caregivers did not understand what kind of care the physical therapist would be able to provide to residents. In addition, the physical therapist considered that a one- sided relationship, such as that existing between the nurses and caregivers, where nurses provide instruction to the caregivers, should not be established between the physical therapist and caregivers. This was because such a relationship would only intensify the frustration felt by caregivers against the physical therapist, failing to instil in caregivers the role of providing care with a rehabilitative perspective that the physical therapist had expected from caregivers. The researcher therefore planned the following two actions:

    1. To help the caregivers develop a closer relationship with the physical therapist, the physical therapist visited every unit on his weekly working day and communicated effectively with caregivers, for example, by asking about the ADL of individual residents.

    2. The physical therapist provided rehabilitation in front of caregivers in the units of residents to demonstrate that rehabilitation is not something special or difficult to do, thereby attempting to gain the caregivers’ respect for his professionalism.

    Action

    The physical therapist conducted rounds at every unit each visit and communicated with caregivers. He thereby worked to build a relationship that would promote free discussion. The physical therapist then obtained permission from the caregivers to encourage the residents to walk and practice using the toilet in the units. He responded to caregiver concerns by telling the caregivers that the residents should adapt their experience with the physical therapist to their ADL, rather than have caregivers become part of the ‘rehabilitation session’. The physical therapist said,

    It is important to flex the joints of those who are bed- ridden at least once a day like this. I want them to live as human beings until their last days. (Physical therapist)

    Mr. S can use the handrail and stand up and move without assistance as long as the bed and wheelchair are placed like this. (Physical therapist)

    The physical therapist demonstrated to caregivers the ways that the residents could smoothly adapt their abilities to ADL in every possible situation and from various angles. Additionally, by explaining the significance of these abilities from the perspective of the residents’ ADL, the physical therapist reinforced the meaning of the movements to the caregivers.

    Evaluation/reflection

    Owing to the manner by which the physical therapist discussed caring from the point view of the residents’ lives, the caregivers came to vaguely realise the meaning of caring to the daily activities of the residents. As an example, one caregiver said,

    Oh, I didn’t realize that such things (not providing too much help when a resident moves from one place to another) constituted rehabilitation. (Caregiver)

    In addition, some caregivers were found trying to provide care during routine tasks while struggling to integrate the new rehabilitation perspective of adapting the resident’s abilities to daily life. However, they were naturally inefficient in these efforts due to a lack of skills and knowledge, given that the physical therapist had only just shared the new perspective with them. Nevertheless, it was clear in the eyes of the therapist that the caregivers’ routines were changing.

    We were deeply impressed by the words of the physical therapist, that he wanted the residents to live as human beings until their last days. (Caregiver)Ms. T is bed- ridden and all I could do for her was to change her diapers and bathe her. However, I realised that there are more things that I can do for her as a caregiver! (Caregiver)

    The likely reason why the caregivers made such comments was that the physical therapist communicated his intentions and wishes to the caregivers, succeeding in creating an atmosphere wherein the caregivers could feel a sense of closeness and companionability with the physical therapist. Nevertheless, it was also true that not every caregiver nor unit implemented care that adapted the residents’ abilities to their daily life. Indeed, as had been feared, a relationship between the physical therapist and caregivers could not be established in two units, and the routine tasks of these caregivers did not change. The leaders of these units did not accept the proposals from the physical therapist and showed a negative attitude towards him. The physical therapist also kept a distance from these units and could not communicate well with the caregivers.

    Cycle 2 Plan

    The physical therapist considered it necessary for the caregivers to strengthen their rehabilitation knowledge and skills to better implement care that adapted the residents’ abilities to their daily life. The physical therapist expected the caregivers to continue their trial practice of caring and considered it necessary to report his findings of changes in the residents following care to the caregivers and to increase their self- efficacy. To achieve these goals, the physical therapist planned the following actions for the purposes of: (1) complementing the rehabilitation knowledge and skills that the caregivers required and (2) reporting changes in residents following trial care by the caregivers, with the expectation that their trial care would continue.

    Action

    The physical therapist supplemented the knowledge and skills of the caregivers in their caring to adapt the residents’ abilities to their ADL. The physical therapist communicated knowledge verbally ande demonstrated skills in front of caregivers.

    Would you kindly join me and observe her beside the bed? …(Omitted)… I know it is very scary to move her joints. It is OK if you move them only slightly like this. (Physical therapist)

    Furthermore, the caregivers undertook continuing such care on a trial basis, while the physical therapist provided approval and feedback for their efforts. For example, the physical therapist provided the following feedback to a caregiver:

    I think that Mr. E can gradually do things without help because the caregivers look after him without offering excessive help. (Physical therapist)

    Evaluation/reflection

    These exchanges with the physical therapist helped caregivers to develop greater self- efficacy in their caring. Furthermore, substantial changes occurred in residents’ ADL, such as in mobility without assistance and in spending time in a chair instead of being confined to bed. Feedback from the physical therapist about caring to help residents adapt their abilities to their ADL gradually led to this care becoming the responsibility of the caregivers. Additionally, the ‘rehabilitation session’ was no longer something special but part of the residents’ ADL. Through this process, it was considered that the caregivers came to provide caring that helped residents adapt their abilities to their ADL. A caregiver said,

    We realised that we could incorporate rehabilitation into their ordinary daily lives, too. So, we decided to give a little more time to Mr. T and wait for him to do things that he could do for himself. We have recently learnt that it is also important for caregivers to wait. (Caregiver)

    As it is almost a habit to move the legs a little while changing their diapers, and we think that we can continue to do this without fail. (Caregiver)

    Semantic MediaWiki通過一套語義標記對知識內容進行標注,用于表示哪些頁面和內容用于顯示,從而可以更方便地進行語義檢索。標記的格式是[[屬性::屬性值]],在檢索時可將所有包含指定屬性等于屬性值的頁面和內容檢索出來。

    It was initially understood that caregivers would be unable to provide care that integrated the rehabilitation perspective when they were busy with tight work schedules or not confident in their practice of care. However, this situation changed following the the physical therapist’s intervention; the caregivers practised rehabilitation- based caring when they had some time to spare or when they were able to consult with the physical therapist on topics that their knowledge and skills remained inadequate.

    Review of the outcome of the entire action research (two cycles)

    The duration of each stage of the TPC process differed among individual caregivers and units due to differences in the behaviour modification of the caregivers. For example, some caregivers remained at the same stage for some time, returned to a previous stage, but then progressed to the next stage after a certain time. In addition, the positive attitude of some of the unit leaders had a good impact on the caregivers; caregivers of five units came to understand that the meaning of caring included helping the residents adapt their abilities to their ADL under the guidance of the unit leaders. The primary cause of these accomplishments was the leaders’ passion in improving the ADL of the residents and their attitudes towards acquiring further knowledge and skills from the physical therapist. In contrast, throughout the observation period, the leaders of two units continued to argue for maintaining a focus on the safety of the residents. These leaders were confident in their abilities and continued to resist any input from unit outsiders (ie, the physical therapist). Nevertheless, some members of these two units sensed the changes in other units and consulted the physical therapist privately. However, they did not speak out in front of their leader and continued to carry out the ‘caring’ that their leader instructed.

    DISCUSSION

    This research study clarified the process through which caregivers worked with a physical therapist in a nursing home to implement care that integrated the role of rehabilitation to adapt residents’ abilities to their daily lives. At the initial stage of the research, the caregivers perceived rehabilitation to be a collection of specific professional activities and showed resistance towards the physical therapist, trying to prevent the addition of rehabilitation to their routine tasks. The caregivers then came to vaguely understand the meaning of care via the building up a relationship of trust with the physical therapist and by assisting residents to improve the adaptation of their abilities to their ADL from the standpoint of a rehabilitation perspective (cycle 1). When the caregivers began to provide care that adapted the residents’ abilities to their ADL under the physical therapist’s guidance, the physical therapist approved the actions of the caregivers and complemented their knowledge and skills on caring. Consequently, caregivers became capable of practising care that integrated a rehabilitation perspective (cycle 2).

    This study revealed that caregivers go through the stages of resistance, recapture, conflicts and trials, and transformation in the process of integrating the perspectives of rehabilitation into caring through working with a physical therapist. First, the caregivers resisted the rehabilitation provided by a physical therapist as an intrusion into their area. This reaction was similar to that described in previous reports, in which individual professionals approached the delivery of patient care from within their professional silo with a clear sense of protecting the boundaries of their profession.2324However, through continued working and dialogue with the physical therapist, the caregivers became vaguely aware of the meaning of care in the lives of residents. They also raised expectations in their practice of caring by integrating the perspectives of rehabilitation. However, they struggled in situations where they could not carry out this newly envisioned care due to the immaturity of their knowledge and skills. Mezirow25stated that decisions and judgements are made within a unique and implicit framework (meaning perspective), which has been cultivated socially and culturally. He explained that transformative learning generates and reconstructs meaning from experience by reflection. He also cited a ‘confusion- causing dilemma’ as one of the phases that often appears in the process of transformative learning.17In this study, the conflicts and trials between caregiver- centred care, which placed importance on safe work execution, and resident- centred care, which did not lead to caring as envisioned by the caregivers’ within their immature knowledge and skills, were considered to be a ‘confusion- causing dilemma’.

    Initially, the physical therapist shared his view that the caregivers needed to view their work from the standpoint of the residents’ lives with the caregivers. In other words, the physical therapist advised caregivers to first focus on the quality of residents’ ADL and to position caring tasks as a part of their efforts to adapt the residents’ abilities to their ADL. Subsequently, the physical therapist approved the caregivers’ attempts to help the residents use their abilities to adapt to their ADL. Furthermore, feedback from the physical therapist to the caregivers about changes in the residents’ ADL abilities appeared to affect the caregivers’ behavioural modification. That is, their behavioural modification arose by rational discourse17with the physical therapist about the uncertain meanings that the caregivers had begun to recognise and by the physical therapist’s approval of their attempts. Of note, interprofessional competency in Japan26was developed based on the behavioural characteristics of professionals who achieved high performance in IPC. It consists of six domains, namely two core domains of ‘Patient-/Client-/Family-/Community- Centred’ and ‘Interprofessional Communication’ and four peripheral domains of ‘Role Contribution’, ‘Facilitation of Relationships’, ‘Reflection’ and ‘Understanding for Others’ (table 1). In the present study, ‘Interprofessional Communication’ between the caregivers and the physical therapist through ‘Client- centred’ perspectives, such as viewing their work from the standpoint of the resident’s life, may have contributed to the achievement of TPC.

    The four stages in the modification of caregiver behaviour were never linear. People generally resist stepping into unknown specialties or undertaking works that they previously recognised as non- specialised.23Practical application and adoption of TPC may therefore take a long time. In the near future, medical and nursing resources will be depleted, even as such care needs increase. The practice of TPC therefore requires the establishment of meaningful perspectives beyond role recognition by repeated dialogue with colleagues and other professionals, and reflection on one’s own role while sharing a patient centred/client centred/family centred/community centred viewpoint through interprofessional communication.

    In this study, the physical therapist worked with caregivers as both researcher and therapist, so it can be said that he was a participant as an observer.27The words and actions of the author as both researcher and physical therapist affected the caregivers, and the caregivers then changed. The observation of changes in the caring of the caregivers led the physical therapist to view the caregivers as collaborators in assisting the ADL of the residents. In other words, a reflexive relationship28arose between the caregivers and the author. It is therefore possible that the researcher’s expectation of observing changes in the caregivers may have influenced his involvement with the caregivers as the physical therapist. Against this, however, the author was always aware of this possibility of reflexivity and tried to maintain a sense of distance from the caregivers in their respective positions. Thus, it is important to view those phenomena seen in collaboration withother professions from the perspective of the practitioner and from the perspective of the researcher in observing and managing TPC.

    Table 1 Interprofessional competency in Japan: competency domains and statements

    This study was an action research conducted in a specific setting, namely a nursing care facility in Japan, and the results might not therefore be applicable to nursing care facilities in other countries with different healthcare and nursing care systems and cultures. Nevertheless, it is expected that the results of this study will contribute to a better understanding of the process of TPC in healthcare and nursing care professionals, including how professionals feel when they step into specialised areas in which they not previously worked and how they interact with other professionals to achieve TPC. In the future, we plan to continue our validation of the process of TPC in various settings in order to provide more robust data for clinical application.

    CONCLUSION

    ContributorsRG and JH were involved in the conception and design of this study, carried out all qualitative enquiries, analysed the data and wrote the paper.

    FundingThe authors have not declared a specific grant for this research from any funding agency in the public, commercial or not- for- profit sectors.

    Competing interestsNone declared.

    Patient consent for publicationNot required.

    Provenance and peer reviewNot commissioned; externally peer reviewed.

    Data availability statementNo data are available.

    Open accessThis is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY- NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non- commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non- commercial. See: http:// creativecommons. org/ licenses/ by- nc/ 4. 0/.

    ORCID iDsRyohei Goto http:// orcid. org/ 0000- 0002- 7315- 2959 Junji Haruta http:// orcid. org/ 0000- 0003- 4176- 7665

    猜你喜歡
    頁面檢索語義
    大狗熊在睡覺
    刷新生活的頁面
    語言與語義
    2019年第4-6期便捷檢索目錄
    “上”與“下”語義的不對稱性及其認知闡釋
    專利檢索中“語義”的表現(xiàn)
    專利代理(2016年1期)2016-05-17 06:14:36
    認知范疇模糊與語義模糊
    同一Word文檔 縱橫頁面并存
    語義分析與漢俄副名組合
    外語學刊(2011年1期)2011-01-22 03:38:33
    淺析ASP.NET頁面導航技術
    亚洲无线在线观看| 亚洲无线在线观看| 欧美日韩瑟瑟在线播放| 一本久久中文字幕| 精品一区二区三区视频在线观看免费| 男人操女人黄网站| 美女大奶头视频| tocl精华| 777久久人妻少妇嫩草av网站| 亚洲五月天丁香| 色在线成人网| 日韩大尺度精品在线看网址 | 香蕉久久夜色| avwww免费| 丰满人妻熟妇乱又伦精品不卡| 两个人视频免费观看高清| 欧美精品啪啪一区二区三区| 国产极品粉嫩免费观看在线| 嫩草影院精品99| 日韩精品青青久久久久久| 亚洲色图综合在线观看| 中国美女看黄片| www.999成人在线观看| 国产精品一区二区三区四区久久 | 99国产精品一区二区三区| 久久久久久亚洲精品国产蜜桃av| 国产又爽黄色视频| 欧美一级a爱片免费观看看 | 首页视频小说图片口味搜索| 婷婷六月久久综合丁香| 亚洲国产高清在线一区二区三 | 欧美黑人欧美精品刺激| 亚洲国产精品sss在线观看| 好男人电影高清在线观看| 日本黄色视频三级网站网址| 欧美激情久久久久久爽电影 | 宅男免费午夜| 欧美日韩瑟瑟在线播放| 国产亚洲欧美精品永久| 国产av精品麻豆| 97碰自拍视频| 国产精品久久视频播放| 国产不卡一卡二| 国产精品亚洲一级av第二区| 啦啦啦韩国在线观看视频| 国产亚洲欧美98| 一级,二级,三级黄色视频| 91精品三级在线观看| 国产精品久久久av美女十八| 少妇 在线观看| 免费观看精品视频网站| 欧美色视频一区免费| 亚洲av熟女| 亚洲第一av免费看| 成人国产综合亚洲| 国产高清videossex| 成人亚洲精品av一区二区| 久久精品国产99精品国产亚洲性色 | 岛国在线观看网站| 国产免费男女视频| 国产精华一区二区三区| 男女床上黄色一级片免费看| 日韩精品青青久久久久久| 欧美乱码精品一区二区三区| 在线观看舔阴道视频| 日韩大尺度精品在线看网址 | 亚洲情色 制服丝袜| 女人被狂操c到高潮| 午夜老司机福利片| 一区在线观看完整版| 人成视频在线观看免费观看| а√天堂www在线а√下载| 久久久水蜜桃国产精品网| 国产欧美日韩精品亚洲av| 人人妻人人爽人人添夜夜欢视频| 国产免费av片在线观看野外av| 黄网站色视频无遮挡免费观看| 两性午夜刺激爽爽歪歪视频在线观看 | 一本久久中文字幕| 久久中文看片网| 午夜福利一区二区在线看| 亚洲午夜精品一区,二区,三区| 亚洲国产中文字幕在线视频| 97超级碰碰碰精品色视频在线观看| 亚洲av熟女| 成人亚洲精品一区在线观看| 亚洲av美国av| 国产精品免费一区二区三区在线| 亚洲视频免费观看视频| 午夜福利一区二区在线看| 久久婷婷人人爽人人干人人爱 | 狠狠狠狠99中文字幕| 午夜福利,免费看| 久久人人97超碰香蕉20202| 一本大道久久a久久精品| 欧美成狂野欧美在线观看| 大型av网站在线播放| 夜夜爽天天搞| 免费看十八禁软件| 久久久水蜜桃国产精品网| 一级a爱片免费观看的视频| 日韩欧美国产一区二区入口| 色av中文字幕| 一级作爱视频免费观看| 狠狠狠狠99中文字幕| 大陆偷拍与自拍| 19禁男女啪啪无遮挡网站| av视频免费观看在线观看| 国产精品影院久久| 精品福利观看| 热re99久久国产66热| 亚洲成国产人片在线观看| 欧美人与性动交α欧美精品济南到| 亚洲五月天丁香| 亚洲精品国产精品久久久不卡| 国产亚洲av高清不卡| 免费在线观看亚洲国产| 可以在线观看的亚洲视频| 欧美日韩福利视频一区二区| 青草久久国产| 黄色片一级片一级黄色片| 精品久久久久久成人av| 在线播放国产精品三级| 亚洲欧美日韩高清在线视频| 精品国产乱子伦一区二区三区| 在线观看舔阴道视频| 亚洲欧美日韩另类电影网站| 无遮挡黄片免费观看| 在线视频色国产色| 日本五十路高清| 身体一侧抽搐| 女同久久另类99精品国产91| 手机成人av网站| 一本综合久久免费| 欧美一级a爱片免费观看看 | 女人爽到高潮嗷嗷叫在线视频| 欧美乱妇无乱码| 美女高潮到喷水免费观看| avwww免费| 婷婷精品国产亚洲av在线| 久久久久久免费高清国产稀缺| 岛国在线观看网站| 亚洲国产日韩欧美精品在线观看 | 成人特级黄色片久久久久久久| 啦啦啦观看免费观看视频高清 | 国产男靠女视频免费网站| 色哟哟哟哟哟哟| 国产午夜福利久久久久久| 国产男靠女视频免费网站| 久久香蕉精品热| 精品福利观看| 亚洲专区字幕在线| 99精品在免费线老司机午夜| 国产人伦9x9x在线观看| 精品欧美一区二区三区在线| 别揉我奶头~嗯~啊~动态视频| av网站免费在线观看视频| 久久中文字幕人妻熟女| 岛国视频午夜一区免费看| 亚洲av美国av| 99精品欧美一区二区三区四区| 亚洲激情在线av| 亚洲成人国产一区在线观看| 宅男免费午夜| 精品乱码久久久久久99久播| 男女做爰动态图高潮gif福利片 | 90打野战视频偷拍视频| 一二三四社区在线视频社区8| 欧美黄色片欧美黄色片| 岛国视频午夜一区免费看| avwww免费| av视频免费观看在线观看| 天堂动漫精品| 黄片小视频在线播放| 88av欧美| 亚洲久久久国产精品| 国产一区二区在线av高清观看| АⅤ资源中文在线天堂| 亚洲中文av在线| 国产精品日韩av在线免费观看 | 久久伊人香网站| 欧美大码av| 亚洲欧美日韩高清在线视频| 欧美最黄视频在线播放免费| 热re99久久国产66热| 精品久久久精品久久久| 咕卡用的链子| 在线观看舔阴道视频| 搞女人的毛片| 国产精品乱码一区二三区的特点 | 男女床上黄色一级片免费看| 久久天躁狠狠躁夜夜2o2o| 欧美激情极品国产一区二区三区| 99热只有精品国产| 黄片小视频在线播放| 十八禁网站免费在线| 久久久久久大精品| 国内毛片毛片毛片毛片毛片| 黑丝袜美女国产一区| av在线天堂中文字幕| 男女之事视频高清在线观看| 夜夜爽天天搞| 亚洲av熟女| 在线观看午夜福利视频| 成人手机av| 成人国语在线视频| 免费久久久久久久精品成人欧美视频| 午夜久久久在线观看| 久久久久久久久免费视频了| 亚洲色图综合在线观看| 黑人操中国人逼视频| 一本综合久久免费| 手机成人av网站| 亚洲精品国产区一区二| 妹子高潮喷水视频| 日韩精品青青久久久久久| 亚洲欧美日韩无卡精品| 欧美在线黄色| 国产精品久久久人人做人人爽| 亚洲精品美女久久久久99蜜臀| 中文字幕人妻丝袜一区二区| 天堂动漫精品| 嫩草影院精品99| cao死你这个sao货| 国产成人精品久久二区二区91| av网站免费在线观看视频| 91国产中文字幕| 久久这里只有精品19| 亚洲欧美激情综合另类| 99久久精品国产亚洲精品| 久久久久久亚洲精品国产蜜桃av| 欧美另类亚洲清纯唯美| 黑人欧美特级aaaaaa片| 午夜日韩欧美国产| 欧美绝顶高潮抽搐喷水| 在线观看66精品国产| 成人av一区二区三区在线看| 欧美日韩黄片免| 999久久久国产精品视频| 欧美日本亚洲视频在线播放| 巨乳人妻的诱惑在线观看| 久久精品aⅴ一区二区三区四区| 男女做爰动态图高潮gif福利片 | 日本精品一区二区三区蜜桃| 在线观看免费视频网站a站| 久久中文字幕一级| 免费搜索国产男女视频| 丝袜人妻中文字幕| 国产欧美日韩一区二区精品| 三级毛片av免费| 97超级碰碰碰精品色视频在线观看| 亚洲精品国产一区二区精华液| 亚洲欧洲精品一区二区精品久久久| 精品国内亚洲2022精品成人| 久久久久久久久中文| 亚洲午夜精品一区,二区,三区| www.自偷自拍.com| 两个人免费观看高清视频| 欧美黑人欧美精品刺激| 国内毛片毛片毛片毛片毛片| 又大又爽又粗| 国产麻豆成人av免费视频| 午夜成年电影在线免费观看| 中文字幕av电影在线播放| ponron亚洲| 日韩视频一区二区在线观看| 成人三级做爰电影| 亚洲熟女毛片儿| 精品乱码久久久久久99久播| 国产成人一区二区三区免费视频网站| 欧美另类亚洲清纯唯美| 真人做人爱边吃奶动态| 变态另类成人亚洲欧美熟女 | 99riav亚洲国产免费| 欧美丝袜亚洲另类 | 91精品三级在线观看| 成在线人永久免费视频| 十八禁人妻一区二区| 两人在一起打扑克的视频| 美女扒开内裤让男人捅视频| 国内精品久久久久精免费| 黑人欧美特级aaaaaa片| 午夜久久久久精精品| 色婷婷久久久亚洲欧美| 欧美不卡视频在线免费观看 | 一进一出抽搐gif免费好疼| 纯流量卡能插随身wifi吗| 国产午夜福利久久久久久| 国产xxxxx性猛交| 日韩欧美一区二区三区在线观看| 丁香欧美五月| 久99久视频精品免费| 午夜老司机福利片| 淫秽高清视频在线观看| 一边摸一边抽搐一进一小说| 老鸭窝网址在线观看| 久久久精品国产亚洲av高清涩受| 成人欧美大片| 久久精品亚洲熟妇少妇任你| 日韩成人在线观看一区二区三区| 国产精品一区二区三区四区久久 | 亚洲激情在线av| 69av精品久久久久久| 一本久久中文字幕| 亚洲免费av在线视频| 欧美国产日韩亚洲一区| 91九色精品人成在线观看| 少妇 在线观看| 色在线成人网| 日韩视频一区二区在线观看| 一区二区三区精品91| 日韩欧美一区视频在线观看| 亚洲,欧美精品.| 在线免费观看的www视频| 成人亚洲精品一区在线观看| aaaaa片日本免费| 中文字幕最新亚洲高清| 成年版毛片免费区| 成人国产一区最新在线观看| 变态另类成人亚洲欧美熟女 | 99国产精品一区二区蜜桃av| 美女扒开内裤让男人捅视频| 免费观看精品视频网站| 国产一区二区三区在线臀色熟女| 亚洲中文av在线| 日韩高清综合在线| aaaaa片日本免费| 搡老熟女国产l中国老女人| 一本综合久久免费| 亚洲全国av大片| 最好的美女福利视频网| 国产一区二区激情短视频| 大陆偷拍与自拍| 国产熟女午夜一区二区三区| 成人欧美大片| 亚洲欧美日韩无卡精品| 亚洲精品中文字幕一二三四区| 亚洲成a人片在线一区二区| 女同久久另类99精品国产91| 午夜精品国产一区二区电影| 99国产精品免费福利视频| 日韩av在线大香蕉| 久久久久精品国产欧美久久久| 亚洲中文字幕一区二区三区有码在线看 | 亚洲精品中文字幕一二三四区| 久久久国产成人精品二区| 黄色丝袜av网址大全| 欧美乱码精品一区二区三区| 国产亚洲av高清不卡| 18禁观看日本| 人人妻人人澡欧美一区二区 | 美女免费视频网站| 国产高清视频在线播放一区| ponron亚洲| 国产精品免费一区二区三区在线| 又大又爽又粗| 91精品国产国语对白视频| 成人av一区二区三区在线看| 在线永久观看黄色视频| 麻豆av在线久日| 久久草成人影院| 亚洲av成人一区二区三| 亚洲电影在线观看av| 国产精品久久久av美女十八| 午夜福利,免费看| 免费人成视频x8x8入口观看| 国产97色在线日韩免费| 波多野结衣巨乳人妻| 91字幕亚洲| 久久久久久大精品| 精品国产一区二区久久| 国产精品一区二区在线不卡| 一二三四在线观看免费中文在| 亚洲欧美日韩另类电影网站| 99国产极品粉嫩在线观看| 欧美黑人精品巨大| 天堂√8在线中文| 极品人妻少妇av视频| 亚洲 欧美一区二区三区| 777久久人妻少妇嫩草av网站| 欧美在线黄色| 欧美日韩乱码在线| 久久香蕉激情| 欧美久久黑人一区二区| 亚洲色图av天堂| 在线视频色国产色| 国产黄a三级三级三级人| www.www免费av| 女人精品久久久久毛片| 啦啦啦韩国在线观看视频| 亚洲欧美激情在线| 少妇被粗大的猛进出69影院| 久久精品国产亚洲av高清一级| 非洲黑人性xxxx精品又粗又长| 真人做人爱边吃奶动态| 午夜福利高清视频| 人人妻人人澡欧美一区二区 | 日韩视频一区二区在线观看| 波多野结衣巨乳人妻| 两个人看的免费小视频| 日韩中文字幕欧美一区二区| 国产成人系列免费观看| 一级片免费观看大全| 欧美黄色淫秽网站| 黄片播放在线免费| 激情在线观看视频在线高清| 国产xxxxx性猛交| 亚洲性夜色夜夜综合| 丝袜人妻中文字幕| 欧美国产日韩亚洲一区| 一边摸一边抽搐一进一出视频| 97人妻精品一区二区三区麻豆 | 给我免费播放毛片高清在线观看| 亚洲男人的天堂狠狠| 女人爽到高潮嗷嗷叫在线视频| 精品国内亚洲2022精品成人| 成年版毛片免费区| 丰满的人妻完整版| 丝袜美腿诱惑在线| 69精品国产乱码久久久| 国产精品一区二区免费欧美| 国产99白浆流出| 长腿黑丝高跟| 亚洲精品国产色婷婷电影| 黑人巨大精品欧美一区二区mp4| 欧美绝顶高潮抽搐喷水| 国产私拍福利视频在线观看| 两个人视频免费观看高清| 久久影院123| 男人舔女人下体高潮全视频| 国产伦人伦偷精品视频| 亚洲欧美精品综合久久99| 久久婷婷成人综合色麻豆| 国产主播在线观看一区二区| 丝袜美腿诱惑在线| 老司机午夜福利在线观看视频| 成人精品一区二区免费| 亚洲成人免费电影在线观看| 精品人妻在线不人妻| 日本免费a在线| 最新在线观看一区二区三区| 精品一区二区三区视频在线观看免费| 久久天堂一区二区三区四区| 一边摸一边抽搐一进一小说| 久久久久国产一级毛片高清牌| 夜夜躁狠狠躁天天躁| 少妇粗大呻吟视频| 日本免费a在线| 婷婷丁香在线五月| 精品不卡国产一区二区三区| 国产成年人精品一区二区| bbb黄色大片| 欧美精品啪啪一区二区三区| 一a级毛片在线观看| 老鸭窝网址在线观看| 午夜成年电影在线免费观看| 欧美大码av| 女性被躁到高潮视频| 91成人精品电影| a在线观看视频网站| 欧美+亚洲+日韩+国产| 婷婷六月久久综合丁香| 免费看美女性在线毛片视频| 很黄的视频免费| 中文字幕av电影在线播放| 日本免费一区二区三区高清不卡 | 婷婷六月久久综合丁香| 国产欧美日韩一区二区精品| 精品久久久久久久人妻蜜臀av | 国产精品久久久久久精品电影 | 久久人人97超碰香蕉20202| 亚洲国产精品成人综合色| 中文字幕最新亚洲高清| 女同久久另类99精品国产91| 波多野结衣高清无吗| 亚洲精品中文字幕一二三四区| 精品午夜福利视频在线观看一区| 美女国产高潮福利片在线看| 宅男免费午夜| 91国产中文字幕| 一本大道久久a久久精品| 一个人免费在线观看的高清视频| 女警被强在线播放| 久久精品亚洲精品国产色婷小说| 深夜精品福利| a在线观看视频网站| 国产成人av激情在线播放| 亚洲全国av大片| 免费看美女性在线毛片视频| 成人欧美大片| 男人舔女人的私密视频| 一个人免费在线观看的高清视频| 操美女的视频在线观看| 亚洲自偷自拍图片 自拍| 日韩欧美一区视频在线观看| 麻豆av在线久日| 最近最新中文字幕大全电影3 | 日韩精品中文字幕看吧| 亚洲 欧美 日韩 在线 免费| 久久中文看片网| 日本 欧美在线| 色尼玛亚洲综合影院| 午夜激情av网站| 国产精品一区二区三区四区久久 | 午夜日韩欧美国产| 国产国语露脸激情在线看| 丁香六月欧美| 亚洲少妇的诱惑av| 免费人成视频x8x8入口观看| 午夜免费鲁丝| 亚洲一区二区三区色噜噜| 深夜精品福利| 久久精品国产99精品国产亚洲性色 | 亚洲色图av天堂| av欧美777| cao死你这个sao货| 婷婷丁香在线五月| 久久精品91蜜桃| 男女床上黄色一级片免费看| 最近最新免费中文字幕在线| √禁漫天堂资源中文www| 亚洲三区欧美一区| 久久久久久国产a免费观看| 给我免费播放毛片高清在线观看| 亚洲中文日韩欧美视频| 91成人精品电影| 亚洲av第一区精品v没综合| 伦理电影免费视频| 动漫黄色视频在线观看| 国产亚洲欧美在线一区二区| 久久这里只有精品19| 不卡av一区二区三区| 午夜福利一区二区在线看| 午夜福利视频1000在线观看 | 国产精品野战在线观看| 国产精品香港三级国产av潘金莲| 久久久久国内视频| 国内精品久久久久精免费| 18禁观看日本| 亚洲av第一区精品v没综合| 制服人妻中文乱码| 国产av在哪里看| 国产精品久久久久久人妻精品电影| 91大片在线观看| 男人舔女人的私密视频| 免费看美女性在线毛片视频| 欧美成人免费av一区二区三区| 亚洲五月色婷婷综合| 亚洲熟妇中文字幕五十中出| 午夜精品久久久久久毛片777| 香蕉久久夜色| 日韩三级视频一区二区三区| e午夜精品久久久久久久| 纯流量卡能插随身wifi吗| 国产一区二区三区在线臀色熟女| 国产亚洲欧美98| 妹子高潮喷水视频| 日韩av在线大香蕉| 日韩大尺度精品在线看网址 | 日韩高清综合在线| 一本综合久久免费| 一个人观看的视频www高清免费观看 | 777久久人妻少妇嫩草av网站| 亚洲熟妇熟女久久| 精品国产乱子伦一区二区三区| 日本免费一区二区三区高清不卡 | 黑人欧美特级aaaaaa片| 麻豆久久精品国产亚洲av| 欧美激情高清一区二区三区| 免费一级毛片在线播放高清视频 | 久久久国产精品麻豆| 脱女人内裤的视频| 波多野结衣av一区二区av| cao死你这个sao货| 国语自产精品视频在线第100页| 99国产综合亚洲精品| 国产成+人综合+亚洲专区| 岛国视频午夜一区免费看| bbb黄色大片| 巨乳人妻的诱惑在线观看| 欧美日韩福利视频一区二区| 亚洲欧美日韩另类电影网站| 日本免费a在线| 久久青草综合色| 99国产精品一区二区三区| 大型黄色视频在线免费观看| 一级片免费观看大全| 欧美日韩瑟瑟在线播放| 露出奶头的视频| 不卡av一区二区三区| 久久人妻福利社区极品人妻图片| 亚洲色图av天堂| 国产精品精品国产色婷婷| 色播在线永久视频| 亚洲熟妇中文字幕五十中出| 一区二区三区国产精品乱码| 黄片小视频在线播放| 国产成人欧美在线观看| 国产欧美日韩一区二区三| 自拍欧美九色日韩亚洲蝌蚪91| 婷婷精品国产亚洲av在线| 色av中文字幕| 91成人精品电影| 国产精品秋霞免费鲁丝片| 国产在线观看jvid| 97超级碰碰碰精品色视频在线观看| 男女下面进入的视频免费午夜 | 国产亚洲av高清不卡| 亚洲国产精品成人综合色| 亚洲专区字幕在线| 日韩视频一区二区在线观看| 欧美精品啪啪一区二区三区| 欧美激情 高清一区二区三区| √禁漫天堂资源中文www| 999久久久国产精品视频|