• <tr id="yyy80"></tr>
  • <sup id="yyy80"></sup>
  • <tfoot id="yyy80"><noscript id="yyy80"></noscript></tfoot>
  • 99热精品在线国产_美女午夜性视频免费_国产精品国产高清国产av_av欧美777_自拍偷自拍亚洲精品老妇_亚洲熟女精品中文字幕_www日本黄色视频网_国产精品野战在线观看 ?

    Revenge and Sociality

    2022-03-03 11:39:39HUANGYan-li
    Journal of Literature and Art Studies 2022年1期

    HUANG Yan-li

    Revenge permeates most of Shakespeare’s plays, and scholars understand the themes in historical context. Some believe that the plays involved revenge are evidence that the public was morally opposed to it. For others, however, these plays expressed the frustrations and desires for justice because revenge could be used to eliminate social diseases and ensure social order. The justice crisis of revenge play reflects the judicial crisis in the early modern English legal system. Pufendorf believes that sociality is decisive factor of social order. The law in a hierarchical society has its natural bias, which will inevitably lead to social inequality and do harm to the cultivation of sociality. Shakespeare’s stage reproduces the crisis and threat faced by the whole judiciary due to a large number of social injustice in the early stage of modern British legal transformation, and reveals the great impact of sociality on the community.

    Keywords: Shakespeare, revenge, sociality, Pufendorf, order

    Introduction

    The Renaissance was the flourishing time of British drama and emerged a large number of excellent dramatists and wonderful plays. Revenge play also gained a certain central position at this time. Some critics even believe that all tragedies in the Elizabethan period should be presented as tragedies about revenge.(Campbell, 1931, p. 290). In fact, in addition to the recognized and specific revenge plays, many Elizabethan tragedies all involved element or plot of revenge. It is a little improper to say that drama without revenge element is pale, but it undoubtedly adds unique charm to drama, especially tragedy, and presents a unique visual feast. Revenge permeated most of Shakespeare’s plays, only two did not involve the plot of revenge. Revenge play was one of the most popular types of drama in the Elizabethan period, and the frequent performance in the theater showed the audience’s enthusiasm about it. England was not a feud culture like Scotland, or Friuli in Italy, then why did a Christian nation relish vengeful and (often) religiously skeptical plays? (Muir, 1993, p. 275). In a tolerance-emphasized Christian society, the popularity of revenge play must signified something. In a feudal kingdom, stage avengers’ assassinating kings or nobles deserves exploration. In the revenge play, the avenger chooses private revenge, which is undoubtedly a distrust of the official institutions that provide fairness and justice. Revenge is not only the innate nature of human beings, but also the main element affecting social order, but also the focus of national law. In the long-term social unrest, the political and religious struggle has brought not only extreme depression and inescapable pessimism in spirit, but also physical mutilation and killing. As a result, death became the central theme and image of the culture of that era. A large number of litigation cases have increased, putting unprecedented pressure on the whole judicial institution.

    Revenge as the Twin of Law

    The modern law is undergoing a process of profound transformation and professionalisation (Dunne, 2016, p. 2). The justice of personal revenge is full of “uncertainty”. Public revenge has become the trend of social development and the condition of social order because public vengeance is the exclusive property of well-policed societies, and our society calls it the judicial system (Girard, 1988, p. 15). However, “the flawed justice system itself that often acts as a spur to vengeance in the first place” (Dunne, 2016, p. 2). When public revenge could not make up the losses of avengers, they would step out of the law and get justice in their own ways. The two views on revenge derived from pagan tradition and Christian religion are contradictory, and could never be reconciled. Both are accepted because of their own legitimacy and reasonableness, and also suspected or condemned because of their own flaws and unreasonableness. The contradiction between private revenge and public revenge is the anxiety reflection in the process of British modern legal construction. Stage avengers often met corrupted legal system, “God’s justice could be slow, his earthly representatives corrupt, the machinery of state out of order, so that flagrant wrongs went unpunished, and this is the usual premise of the English revenge play” (Burnett, 1998, p. 21). Therefore, scholar like Watson regarded revenge as “an important supplement to official justice in an era of very limited police powers” (Watson, 2002, p. 160). Dramatic revenge imitates the Tudor law and gives the avenger punishment corresponding to his “crime”—the thieves’ hands are cut off and the scolding tongue bridled.1 When Othello wanted to revenge his “betraying” wife, he took corresponding revenge and suffocated Desdemona on the defiled bed by her. When Titus Andronicus’ son avenged him, Shakespeare also emphasized this equivalence, “Can the son’s eye behold his father bleed? / There’s meed for meed, death for a deadly deed”(5.3.64-65). Hamlet gave up a good chance of killing his uncle to revenge his father, because Claudius was confessing his crime at that time. king him would send him to heaven, which would make Hamlet’s revenge lose its equivalence, because his murdered father could not enter heaven. In many Elizabethan and Jacobean revenge plays, the violence and the strong emotion of the avenger are so strange that any social or ethical observation is submerged in the plots.

    Titus Andronicus is full of Seneca bloody scenes, which caused a lot negative criticism from the scholars. Schlegel concluded that this play was “an accumulation of cruelties and enormities” (Schlegel, 1879, p. 442), Wilson thought it like “some broken-down cart, laden with bleeding corpses from an Elizabethan scaffold”(Wilson, 1948, p. x). However, some scholar also have positive criticism on Titus Andronius, arguing his revenge(killing the emperor) saves Rome (Woodbridge, 2010, pp. 173-174). Posner believes that revenge play mirrors the prevailing ambivalent attitude in Shakespeare’s society (Posner, 2009, p. 108). Bacon described revenge as a kind of “wild justice”. Bacon was firm in his attitude towards revenge. The more human nature likes to revenge, the more the law should eradicate it. Because first of all, the offender only violates the law, and the revenge of the wrong makes the law out of office. This seems to support the authority of English laws and deny individual revenge, but it also recognizes the “justice” of private revenge. According to the interpretation of the Oxford Dictionary, the word “wild” holds a lot of meanings, having no discipline or natural and innate. Wild justice implies that justice is endowed by nature and reveals the legal characteristics at that time in an indirect way: law and justice are not necessarily linked, sometimes even spear and shield. Revenge on the Elizabethan stage was regarded as a “perverted form of justice” (Woodbridge, 2010, p. 9). Similarly, this view shows that sometimes revenge embodied justice. Thus, revenge could be seen as the dark twin of law, which is not complete justice, but has its own reasonableness.

    Revenge as a Therapy

    Revenge is closely related to social order. In the context of body politics and ancient medical theories in the Renaissance, revenge is regarded as a therapy to get rid of the diseases caused by immoral harm to tragic characters. In connection with the prevailing analogy between the big cosmos and the small cosmos at that time, revenge is also an effective way to eliminate the diseases of the national regime, purify the increasingly polluted national community, rectify the decaying morality and corrupted politics. Harris believes that revenge brought avengers physiological damage and thus a major cause of melancholy (Harris, 2004, p. 101). Graham regards revenge an obsessive passion, which produced symptomatic ill-health and nervous disorders. (Holderness, 1987, p. 51). Prosser also believes that revenge caused “deterioration of the mind” (Prosser, 1971, p. 8). Obviously, revenge may cause patients’ psychological and physical diseases, so Titus and Hamlet are associated with madness and depression. Not only the Avenger is ill, but the avenged is also ill. According to the body fluid theory of the Renaissance, the four body fluids in the human body are essential to health. The four body fluids correspond to the four elements in the universe. The distribution of the four elements affects the order of the universe. The mixing of the four body fluids in the human body determines the temperament, personality and health of the human body. The human body and even the human morality and soul are related to the mixing of body fluids. People with a lot of blood have excess lust, people with a lot of yellow bile are irritable, people with a lot of black bile are thoughtful and melancholy, and people with a lot of phlegm are timid and dull. The Roman emperor lost his reason and turned Tamora, the enemy of Rome, into the queen of Rome. The combination of the two meant that bad blood and good blood blend together, and the healthy Roman regime was infected. At the same time, the purity of girls was closely related to the glory of the family. Lavinia’s humiliation represented that the pure blood of the Roman general’s family was stained by the blood of other races. Finally, infection leaded to a social crisis, killing and rape fill the whole play, the harmonious order disappeared, and the whole country and government fell into a state of disease. Shakespeare used humoral rhetoric to write the process of illness and therapy of the Roman regime. At the very beginning of the play, Titus sacrificed Tamora’s eldest son in the ritual for the dead Roman soldiers. Tamora begged “stain not thy tomb with blood” (1.1.116), which suggested the alien blood was dirty. And she said “l(fā)et my spleenful sons this trull deflower” (2.3.191). With her hands cut off and her tongue out, Lavinia used her mouth and stumps to write the name of the murderers. Her uncle, Marcus, exclaimed “What, what! the lustful sons of Tamora/Performers of this heinous, bloody deed ?” (4.1.79-80). Medical terminology rhetoric reveals that the “l(fā)ust” of the perpetrator is the result of excess body fluid. In Marcos’s words, lust is directly related to blood color. In Hamlet, the combination of Gertrude and Claudius was also a sign that bad blood polluted healthy blood. Hamlet lamented “tis an unweeded garden/That grows to seed,things rank and gross in nature/Possess it merely” (1.2.135-7). In Shakespeare’s time, gardens are often used to be a metaphor of kingdom. Gardens full of weeds are undoubtedly a metaphor for social disorder and crisis. His mother got married to his uncle quickly after his father’s death was no nobler than an animal, for “a beast that wants discourse of reason/Would have mourned longer” (1.2.150).

    Cosmology and humoral theory are the most popular theories and concepts in the Renaissance, which not only permeated the political and ideological ideas, but also reflected in literary works such as poetry and drama. Correlation had been established among cosmos, regime and human body in the cosmology system composed of microcosm-macrocosm correspondence. Analogy between nature and human were common in all areas. The harmony of the human body metaphors the harmony between the state and the universe, and the disease of the human body metaphors the disorder of the state and the chaos of the universe. On the contrary, it is also the case. Under this analogy network, words such as disease, chaos, corruption and death became the main rhetorical discourse to write about the state of government, social order and human health. England regarded disease “as a state of internal imbalance…. caused by humoral disarray or deficiency”. At the same time, external factors may also cause diseases, because body is open and easy to be harmed by “an excess of melancholy, phlegm, or choler, or a deficiency of blood” (Harris, 2004, p. 13). Disease originates from the human body itself and external factors. Everyone is an individual in society. Social order exists in the collection of countless individuals. Similarly, the destruction of order is the result of the joint action of internal and external forces. The Roman emperor introduced wolves into the house and made the evil tamorra a member of the royal family. The protector of the state subverted his duties and obligations and personally welcomed the “external virus” into the original healthy Roman regime. Lavinia, the daughter of the Roman general, was defiled. Her pure blood was stained with the septic blood of the son of Tamora. The “virus” will infect the whole family and the Roman Empire through her body. According to the Renaissance cosmology system and analogy ideas, the diseases, social order and nature are related. When Titus discovered the tragedy of Lavinia and was cheated into cutting off his arm that had waved a sword to defend Rome, but in exchange for heads of his two sons, Titus couldn’t restrain his grief and shouted“When heaven doth weep, doth not the earth o’erflow?/ If the winds rage, doth not the sea wax mad” (3.1.222-3). The diseases and social disorder would bring changes in climate.

    Since the human disease is related to the social order and the health of the national regime, how to treat the disease, lead the chaotic social order back to the right track and restore national harmony has become the core of the drama plot. Revenge has become an effective way to cure disease and reestablish order out of chaos. When the state organizations failed to perform the function of the judicial system and let the victims get justice, public revenge failed. In Hamlet and Titus Andronius, the victims need to revenge the persons standing on the top of the feudal hierarchy. Thus the law is not the embodiment of justice, but the exercise of violence. The unfair judicial system urges the victims to take private revenge. Resorting to private revenge shows distrust of the official institutions that guarantee fairness and show law and justice, or it is a helpless choice under the inaction of public revenge. Gregory Semenza expressed his ideas on Elizabethan revenge, saying because the legal system was less effective, the impulse toward self-government was greater (Semenza, 2006, p. 54) . On the one hand, the concept of blood revenge originated from the Germanic traditionas still had a certain influence in the Elizabethan society. At that time, the legal system was problematic, and there were many problems in legal practice, such as the competition for jurisdiction, the corruption of judges, the reversal of black and white by lawyers, etc.; On the other hand, the specialization and centralization of law are increasingly strengthened. Facing this situation, the English people are in a state of anxiety in the process of early legal construction in England. The Christian doctrine of tolerance prohibits the victims from taking private revenge, but the less effective legal mechanism can not achieve public revenge. They are in a moral dilemma. “Shakespeare’s plays show a deeper penetration into the nature of the ethical dilemma involved in revenge … than do the plays of his contemporaries” (Prosser, 1971, p. 94). “All the voices of Church and State inveighed against revenge” (Prosser, 1971, p. xi), and the ghost was regarded as the label of the devil, because ordering others to take revenge was contrary to Christian doctrine. But a close reading of the dramatic texts of this period revealed that revenge was therapeutic. Many Avengers were people deprived of power and treated unfairly. They suffered a lot, and revenge was used as a tool to “restore their integrity – their sense of psychic wholeness” (Keyishian, 1995, p. 2). Thus, through revenge, avengers got a feeling of “voluptas” (Burnett, 1998, pp. 1-2). What’s more, revenge was also considered as bloodletting therapy in classical medicine. Excess or mixture of body fluids was the root of body diseases and even social disorder. Cutting the skin and bloodletting was a fast and effective treatment. The perpetrator had “excess body fluid”. The atrocity caused the avenger’s severe emotional fluctuations such as sadness, anger and depression, and makes the avenger’s body fluid in disorder. Revenge cleaned the enemy and the avenger himself through surgical bleeding, their diseases can be treated, and the harmonious state of body fluids could be reestablished. According to the analogy between the microcosmos and the macrocosmos, the cure of physical diseases also represents the recovery of social order. Burnett found that Greek myths and legends conveyed a view: all order was actually based on revenge. Revenge was not a crime that people must abolish if they wanted to enter a regulated group. It is not “the opposite of order” but the “original and vital form” of revenge. And thus the public revenge was just a borrowed version of each man’s “ingrained right” to revenge (Burnett, 1998, p. 64). Considering the humanists’admiration of ancient Greek culture in the Renaissance, perhaps Shakespeare intentionally mimicked Greece myths and represent the idea of reconstructing social order through revenge.

    Revenge and Oppression

    Revenge is the product of anger and response after encountering physical or mental harm. Othello was rarely regarded as a revenge play by readers, audiences and even researchers of Shakespeare’s play. However, the play had been inseparable from revenge at the beginning. Iago carefully planned his revenge for Othello because of his unfair treatment. Othello mistakenly believed his wife’s infidelity because of Iago’s deception. The story ended with the common demise of the avenger and the avenged. Revenge also played an important role in The Merchant of Venice, and the related anti-Semitism research has also attracted extensive attention. Although Shylock was a usury merchant, his actual evil deeds were not described in theplay. Antonio’s disgust of him originated from his Jewish identity, which was the general attitude of Christians towards Jews at that time. Jews were considered to be the descendants of the murderer of Jesus and were prohibited from engaging in any decent work. Many Jews choose the usury. Antonio abused Shylock in public, his transactions and the money he earned, which made Shylock determined to retaliate against him as soon as he had a chance. The cause of revenge in the two plays comes from the social inequality and oppression the characters suffered, so as to stimulate the desire for revenge and put it into action.

    Othello begins with Iago’s reason for revenge. He explained to Roderigo that he has been treated unfairly in society—although he was recommended by three important people, he failed to get the promotion. What makes him most angry was that Othello chose a “great arithmetican” as his assistant. In this period, numbers are often used to represent military arrangements. The word arithmetician was used both in business and military. Here it means a student of “the bookish theoric”, indicating Cassio is only proficient in book knowledge of military tactics. (Wilson, 2009, p. 142). He accused Cassio of being a Florentine never leading a team of soldiers. Although he had some book knowledge, he was not as good as a woman who was always in her boudoir. Finally, Iago stated his reasons for being more qualified for promotion. He performed well in battles in Rhodes, at Cyprus, and on other grounds Christian and heathen, and pointed out that Othello had seen this with his own eyes. Moreover, his original position should be above Cassio, but Cassio was “promoted beyond his rank” to replace him as deputy general. Iago complained that the promotion of the army did not rely on individual merit and the traditional sequential supplement rules, but on the favor of the officers. This inequality planted the seed of revenge. Unlike other procrastinating avengers, Iago’s revenge is fast and quick. In addition to the promotion issue, Iago suspected that Othello and Cassio had an affair with his wife, so he decided to set up a trap to revenge Othello and start from Desdemona, because only “wife for wife” could make his revenge equitable (2.1.285-6). Berry observes that “class resentment permeates Iago” (Berry, 1988, p. 115).

    Shakespeare further exposed the class inequality and oppression. In the first scene of the second act, Cassio showed different attitudes towards “superiors and subordinates”. He warmly welcomed Desdemona, but“humiliated” Iago. He kissed Amelia openly, showing his right to “get along freely with his “subordinate’s wife”, claiming that it was polite according to his breeding, but for Iago it was not. He asked Iago not to be angry, “Let it not gall your patience” (2.1.97). However, the word “gall” might sharpen the insult for its meaning of causing saddle sores. Honigmann concluded that “audiences must have recognized a familiar class barrier between that condescending ‘good Iago’ and the word ‘Sir’” (83). Once after Cassion got drunken, he sharped the class oppression. They talked about salvation, and Cassio claimed “Not before me. The lieutenant is to be saved before the ensign” (2.3.98-99). For Iago, the promotion position that he should have obtained was “taken” by Cassio and used as a weapon to attack himself. Iago’s hatred for Cassio would grow and his resentment against social oppression would also intensify. Desdemona joined the disparaging attack on Iago too. She used “you” to Cassio, but “Thou” to Iago, indicating that she thought the former belonged to the same class as her and the latter belonged to a lower social class. Iago were surrounded by class inequalities. Othello turned a blind eye to the merits he made in battles; Cassio took away his promotion, flirted with his wife recklessly and humiliated him face to face; Desdemona unconsciously showed her superiority of the class. All these made Iago an avenger and conspirator, carefully designing a series of traps, and using Othello to capture the three “enemies”.

    Similarly, in The Merchant of Venice, Shylock remained unmoved by the pleas and advice of the people and insisted on revenge against Antonio, which was the consequence of the resentment of long-term oppression. He could no longer restrain his desire for revenge. Shakespeare clearly showed in his plays that the persecution and oppression of Jews in the whole society were not covered up, and Shylock admitted that it was their national characteristic to endure persecution. Antonio did not do physical harm to Shylock, nor did he involve the flow of blood, but Shylock’s revenge was for the purpose of blood, because the mental injury and pain he suffered needed“bloodletting treatment”. This desire for revenge came from resentment against social inequality and oppression.In the second loan negotiation, Bassanio used “you” to Shylock (May you stead me?/ Will you please me? /Shall I know your answer?), but Antonio ignored it. He did not want to give Shylock equal social status, but used the way of calling his name directly or the subordinate “Thou”. He arrogantly made an order rather than a request. He rudely interrupted Shylock twice, call him “villain”, “evil” and “apple rotten” (1.3.94-102). In the face of Antonio’s pride and despise, Shylock still agreed to lend him money. Of course, there was a professional need. But the more important reason was that he wanted to repay his deep hatred. A shrewd businessman should know that such a move was very dangerous. He was not only taking revenge against an individual, but also challenging a class. Even in Venice, where the business economy was developed and the contract was relatively fair, his leapfrog behavior would touch the nerves of the rulers. In order to ask Antonio to follow the contract, he would rather than threaten the Duke of Venice. Even several times of interest could not make him give up his “l(fā)odged hate and a certain loathing” (4.1.60). This hysterical desire for revenge hid his desire for equality. His“declaration of equality” made readers and audiences have a multi-dimensional understanding of the character image that should be hated, rather than a simple disgust. “Hath not a Jew eyes? hath not a Jew hands, organs, dimensions, senses, affections,… as a Christian is?… Should we not revenge” (3.1.54-63). This series of rhetorical questions directly pointed to one question: what is the difference between Jews and Christians?

    Stanley Cavell found it very puzzling that Shylock just accepted the “judicial interpretation” of Portia. Although the reversal was common in drama, this was abrupt and unreasonable. After listening to Portia’s interpretation of “cutting a pound of meat”, Shylock gave up all protests and arguments. He emerged from being eloquent into speechless, and collapsed visibly. Stanley took it as the embodiment of Shylock’s loss of discourse power. Although he could continue to argue a pound of meat contain blood, Shylock gave up. Cavell believed that Shylock became speechless because he realized that even destroying Antonio could not change the oppression endured by the Jews, or because he realized that he could not deny that the contract had nothing to do with blood, because he really wanted the blood of Christians. (Cavell, 2013, pp. 221-229). In fact, Shylock’s“aphasia” was caused by his weakness and inability before “judicial interpretation”, although he signed a contract protected by the law with Antonio, the implementation and interpretation of the law would never favor a Jewish pagan, and he could only silently endure what was coming to him. He kept half his property temporarily at the cost of giving up his faith. Portia kept pushing Shylock, asking him aggressively “Art thou contented, Jew? /what dost thou say?” (4.1.388-90).

    Conclusion

    Oppression goes hand in hand with resistance. In order to pursue equality, people must rise up against oppression. Iago and Shylock are not special in the social environment. They each represented a group of people in the society. These dramatic characters had their own shortcomings and deficiencies, just as the people they represent did. When they encounter unfair treatment, they would desire to revenge, take retaliatory actions, and disrupt social order. In fact, while denying revenge, the audience and readers could not help but sympathize and understand these characters. From 1581 to1602, at least 35 riots broke out in London, and a social historian even said “it seemed as if the whole fabric of the urban community might be about to disintegrate” (Dunne, 2016, p. 72). The desire for revenge caused the disintegration of the community, made the society step into disorder and the avengers look disgusting, but actually the source of revenge came from the alienation of the avenger.According to Pufendorf, people establish a state or community because of their security needs, and members of the community have social obligations to each other. Obviously, social order depends on the performance of obligations. Pufendorf believed that man concerned about self-preservation. Without the help of his companions, he could protect himself and benefit a lot from mutual assistance. At the same time, he is “malicious, aggressive, provoked and willing to do harm to others” (Pufendorf, 1991, p. 35). Pufendorf saw the weakness and evil in human nature and proposed to use sociality as a weapon to deal with it. Thus it is necessary for ever people to be sociable, not only because of people’ vulnerability to other animals, but also their own evil and lust. In the process of socialization, people should cultivate and preserve “sociality”. Pufendorf believes sociality is the foundation and justification of natural laws. It does not mean “the tendency that people have to form a specific social form”, but “an attitude that people get along with each other and subject to its constraints”. It requires people should treat others with a kind, peaceful and friendly attitude and bear mutual obligations. The realization of self security requires individuals to fulfill social obligations and abide by the law. However, social inequality alienates the revenger and makes them “others”, and community is no longer the guarantee of security, but the source of danger, so the revenger is often lonely and isolated, as Neill observed the revenge “has ceased to be a social man” (Neil, 1997, pp. 251-252).

    If self-preservation and self-love are the interest factors for people to establish the country and society, then the sense of social belonging is the spiritual demand for the establishment of the country and society. The love of the community generated by the sense of social belonging make it possible to be transformed into social dedication, and the recognition of human natural equality is the premise of the sense of social belonging. People not only pay great attention to their own preservation, but also have a subtle feeling of their own value. Therefore, Pufendorf believes that the ultimate and most effective rebuttal of insolence and insults from others is “Look, I am not a dog, but a man as well as yourself” (Pufendorf, 1991, p. 61). Human nature belongs to all people equally. No one is willing to get along with people who do not regard them as the same kind. It is one of people’s obligations to recognize the equality of the others, treat and value them as man. Everyone is able to hurt others and possible to be hurt by others. In order for others to treat themselves in the way they should, everyone has the obligation to cultivate sociality. At the same time, it must be recognized that there are natural rights every one enjoys. Thus Pufendorf believes that it is a great mistake to show contempt for others by “deeds, words, looks, laughter or slighting gesture”, because it “vigorously excites the hearts of others to violent anger and desire for revenge” (Pufendorf, 1991, p. 63). Humiliation and contempt will make people feel excluded from the group, and the sense of alienation will replace the sense of social belonging. He will no longer regard himself as a member of the society and will not actively fulfill his obligations. What the group brings is not security and order, but danger and attack. Therefore, only when everyone recognizes the equality of others, actively performs their social obligations, and treats others fairly and friendly can we keep good social order.

    References

    Berry, R. (1988). Shakespeare and social class. NJ: Humanities Press.

    Burnett, A. P. (1998). Revenge in Attic and later tragedy. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Campbell, L. B. (1931). “Theories of revenge in Renaissance England”. Modern Philology, 28, 281-96.

    Cavell, S. (2013). Saying in The Merchant of Venice. In B. Cormack, M. C. Nussbaum, & R. Strier (Eds.), Shakespeare and the law: A conversation among disciplines and professions (pp. 221-230). Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.

    Dunne, D. (2016). Shakespeare, revenge tragedy and early modern law. New York: Palgrave Macmillian.

    Girard, R. (1988). Violence and the sacred (P. Gregory, Trans.). London: Athlone Press.

    Harris, J. G. (2004). Sick economies: Drama, Mercantilism, and disease in Shakespeare’s England. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.

    Holderness, G. (1987) (Ed.). Hamlet. Philadelphia: Open University Press.

    Honigmann, E. A. J. (1976). Shakespeare: Seven tragedies: The dramatist’s manipulation of response. London: Macmillan.

    Jorgensen, P. A. (1971) Our naked frailties: Sensational art and meaning in “Macbeth.” Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Keyishian, H. (1995). The shapes of revenge: Victimization, vengeance, and vindictiveness in Shakespeare. NJ: Humanities Press.

    Muir, E. (1993). Mad blood stirring: Vendetta and factions in friuli during the renaissance. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.

    Neill, M. (1997). Issues of death: Mortality and identity in English renaissance tragedy. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

    Posner, R. A. (2009). Law and literature. Massachusetts: Harvard University Press.

    Prosser, E. (1971). Hamlet and revenge. Stanford: Stanford University Press.

    Pufendorf, S. (1991). On the duty of man and citizen according to natural law (M. Silverthorne, Trans.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Schlegel, A. W. (1879). Lectures on dramatic art and literature. London: George Bell and Sons.

    Semenza, & Colón, G. M. (2006). The Spanish tragedy and revenge. In G. A. Sullivan Jr, P. Cheney, & A. Hadfield (Eds.), Early modern English drama: A critical companion. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Watson, R. N. (2002). Tragedies of revenge and ambition. In C. McEachern (Ed.), The Cambridge companion to Shakespearean tragedy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Wilson, J. D. (2009). (Ed.). Othello. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Wilson, J. D. (Ed.). (1948). Titus andronicus. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Woodbridge, L. (2010). English renvenge drama. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    在线观看一区二区三区| 免费观看的影片在线观看| 国产成人aa在线观看| 在线播放国产精品三级| 老司机影院毛片| av免费观看日本| 久久久久久久午夜电影| 国产麻豆成人av免费视频| 亚洲天堂国产精品一区在线| 欧美区成人在线视频| 国产三级中文精品| 久久久精品94久久精品| 久久人人爽人人片av| 青春草视频在线免费观看| 熟女电影av网| 色综合亚洲欧美另类图片| 一区二区三区四区激情视频| 亚洲av不卡在线观看| 国产伦理片在线播放av一区| 欧美又色又爽又黄视频| 淫秽高清视频在线观看| 99热这里只有是精品在线观看| 精品久久久噜噜| 精品不卡国产一区二区三区| 国产精品,欧美在线| videossex国产| 国产精品久久电影中文字幕| 成人亚洲欧美一区二区av| 日本午夜av视频| 欧美性感艳星| 啦啦啦啦在线视频资源| 日韩,欧美,国产一区二区三区 | 久久久久久久午夜电影| 少妇熟女欧美另类| 日本熟妇午夜| 亚洲欧洲国产日韩| 18禁裸乳无遮挡免费网站照片| 99热这里只有精品一区| av福利片在线观看| 美女黄网站色视频| 麻豆成人午夜福利视频| 国产在线男女| 国产 一区精品| 18禁在线播放成人免费| 久久草成人影院| 欧美日韩国产亚洲二区| 国产三级在线视频| 69av精品久久久久久| 免费看日本二区| 国产伦理片在线播放av一区| 欧美日韩精品成人综合77777| 午夜亚洲福利在线播放| 高清毛片免费看| 三级经典国产精品| 免费电影在线观看免费观看| 国产精品久久久久久精品电影小说 | 日产精品乱码卡一卡2卡三| 国国产精品蜜臀av免费| 成人鲁丝片一二三区免费| 在线播放无遮挡| 国产极品天堂在线| 国产黄片视频在线免费观看| 亚洲av电影不卡..在线观看| 伊人久久精品亚洲午夜| 国产伦精品一区二区三区视频9| 国产成人a∨麻豆精品| 国产精品久久电影中文字幕| 精品熟女少妇av免费看| 九九热线精品视视频播放| 水蜜桃什么品种好| 亚洲性久久影院| 国产精品福利在线免费观看| 男女视频在线观看网站免费| 午夜久久久久精精品| 在线a可以看的网站| 久久久久久伊人网av| 国语对白做爰xxxⅹ性视频网站| 国产亚洲av片在线观看秒播厂 | 亚洲精品日韩在线中文字幕| 天美传媒精品一区二区| 亚洲不卡免费看| 夫妻性生交免费视频一级片| 亚洲av福利一区| 1024手机看黄色片| 免费av观看视频| 国产极品天堂在线| 少妇猛男粗大的猛烈进出视频 | 久久草成人影院| 国产在线男女| 国内精品一区二区在线观看| 亚洲高清免费不卡视频| 天美传媒精品一区二区| 国产免费视频播放在线视频 | 久久久久久伊人网av| 亚洲精品国产成人久久av| 成人午夜高清在线视频| 插阴视频在线观看视频| 99热全是精品| 一卡2卡三卡四卡精品乱码亚洲| 久久久a久久爽久久v久久| 波多野结衣巨乳人妻| 亚洲国产精品合色在线| 精品国产露脸久久av麻豆 | 全区人妻精品视频| 精品一区二区三区人妻视频| 丰满乱子伦码专区| 晚上一个人看的免费电影| 国产白丝娇喘喷水9色精品| 免费av毛片视频| 99久国产av精品国产电影| 国产精品电影一区二区三区| 黄片无遮挡物在线观看| 狠狠狠狠99中文字幕| 亚洲国产精品国产精品| 日本-黄色视频高清免费观看| 国产成人精品婷婷| 欧美丝袜亚洲另类| 欧美日本视频| 美女国产视频在线观看| 午夜激情福利司机影院| 少妇熟女aⅴ在线视频| 日韩精品有码人妻一区| 国产精品熟女久久久久浪| 啦啦啦韩国在线观看视频| 国产精品国产三级专区第一集| 日本爱情动作片www.在线观看| 久久久久久久国产电影| 国产精品一区二区性色av| 久久精品综合一区二区三区| 成人亚洲精品av一区二区| .国产精品久久| 国产精品一区二区三区四区久久| 成人鲁丝片一二三区免费| 看十八女毛片水多多多| 国产av不卡久久| 亚洲成人久久爱视频| 日韩在线高清观看一区二区三区| 国产伦精品一区二区三区视频9| 大香蕉97超碰在线| 亚洲成av人片在线播放无| 国产 一区精品| av国产久精品久网站免费入址| 欧美97在线视频| 亚洲精品亚洲一区二区| 欧美xxxx黑人xx丫x性爽| 国产色婷婷99| 3wmmmm亚洲av在线观看| 亚洲国产精品成人久久小说| 午夜免费男女啪啪视频观看| 精品一区二区免费观看| 男女视频在线观看网站免费| 在现免费观看毛片| 蜜桃亚洲精品一区二区三区| 国产v大片淫在线免费观看| 国产久久久一区二区三区| 18+在线观看网站| 亚洲av日韩在线播放| 只有这里有精品99| 亚洲自偷自拍三级| 91久久精品国产一区二区成人| 亚洲人与动物交配视频| 国产单亲对白刺激| 亚洲在线观看片| 看免费成人av毛片| 久久久午夜欧美精品| 99热网站在线观看| 色播亚洲综合网| 国产精品国产三级国产专区5o | 九九热线精品视视频播放| 国产单亲对白刺激| 身体一侧抽搐| 搡老妇女老女人老熟妇| 中文字幕久久专区| 黄片无遮挡物在线观看| 99在线视频只有这里精品首页| 国产亚洲精品av在线| 国产精品av视频在线免费观看| 国产精品熟女久久久久浪| 97超碰精品成人国产| 国产午夜精品久久久久久一区二区三区| 国产黄片视频在线免费观看| 免费人成在线观看视频色| 国产亚洲5aaaaa淫片| 一个人观看的视频www高清免费观看| 精品久久久久久久久久久久久| 色网站视频免费| 国产在线男女| 亚洲av成人精品一区久久| 欧美激情久久久久久爽电影| 亚洲精品久久久久久婷婷小说 | 久久久精品94久久精品| 最近的中文字幕免费完整| 成人美女网站在线观看视频| 白带黄色成豆腐渣| 久久99精品国语久久久| 国产成年人精品一区二区| 亚洲五月天丁香| 女人被狂操c到高潮| 国产午夜精品一二区理论片| 国产午夜福利久久久久久| www日本黄色视频网| 18禁在线播放成人免费| 国产黄色视频一区二区在线观看 | 日韩大片免费观看网站 | 国产成人精品一,二区| 夫妻性生交免费视频一级片| 精品国产三级普通话版| 日韩亚洲欧美综合| 亚洲欧美日韩东京热| 在线免费观看的www视频| 桃色一区二区三区在线观看| 国产成人精品久久久久久| 午夜亚洲福利在线播放| 亚洲人成网站在线观看播放| 久久久久久久久久黄片| 晚上一个人看的免费电影| 国产女主播在线喷水免费视频网站 | 日日摸夜夜添夜夜爱| 国产免费又黄又爽又色| 久久这里只有精品中国| 成人鲁丝片一二三区免费| 午夜福利在线观看免费完整高清在| 偷拍熟女少妇极品色| 国产又黄又爽又无遮挡在线| 男女下面进入的视频免费午夜| 国产黄色视频一区二区在线观看 | 亚洲欧美一区二区三区国产| 中文亚洲av片在线观看爽| 久久人妻av系列| 人人妻人人澡欧美一区二区| 午夜免费激情av| 91狼人影院| 精品午夜福利在线看| 国产一级毛片在线| 日韩精品青青久久久久久| 97热精品久久久久久| 国产亚洲精品av在线| 免费不卡的大黄色大毛片视频在线观看 | 久久久久久久国产电影| 久久99蜜桃精品久久| 禁无遮挡网站| 亚洲av二区三区四区| 久久久久久大精品| av黄色大香蕉| 3wmmmm亚洲av在线观看| 日韩一区二区三区影片| 国产午夜福利久久久久久| 一区二区三区四区激情视频| 欧美变态另类bdsm刘玥| 精品午夜福利在线看| 国产精品蜜桃在线观看| 亚洲乱码一区二区免费版| 午夜精品在线福利| 在线a可以看的网站| 亚洲av一区综合| 大又大粗又爽又黄少妇毛片口| 久久精品久久久久久噜噜老黄 | 亚洲精品成人久久久久久| 能在线免费观看的黄片| 寂寞人妻少妇视频99o| 欧美zozozo另类| 免费一级毛片在线播放高清视频| 亚州av有码| 亚洲欧美精品综合久久99| 中文天堂在线官网| 亚洲最大成人手机在线| 亚洲中文字幕日韩| 国产高清有码在线观看视频| 尾随美女入室| 激情 狠狠 欧美| 一级爰片在线观看| 国产私拍福利视频在线观看| 亚洲欧美精品综合久久99| 亚洲精品乱码久久久久久按摩| 最后的刺客免费高清国语| 国产成人freesex在线| 国产亚洲午夜精品一区二区久久 | 国产亚洲一区二区精品| 日韩欧美 国产精品| 日韩高清综合在线| 国产精品一区二区在线观看99 | 少妇猛男粗大的猛烈进出视频 | 国产精品电影一区二区三区| 在线观看一区二区三区| 亚洲国产成人一精品久久久| 亚洲精品,欧美精品| 亚洲欧美日韩高清专用| 夫妻性生交免费视频一级片| av卡一久久| 亚洲性久久影院| 国产精品日韩av在线免费观看| 午夜久久久久精精品| av免费观看日本| 人妻系列 视频| 欧美日韩一区二区视频在线观看视频在线 | 国产亚洲av片在线观看秒播厂 | 国产一区二区在线av高清观看| 在线播放国产精品三级| 日本午夜av视频| 午夜激情欧美在线| 1000部很黄的大片| 亚洲欧美清纯卡通| av.在线天堂| 免费搜索国产男女视频| 国产探花极品一区二区| 日本爱情动作片www.在线观看| 国产精品人妻久久久久久| 变态另类丝袜制服| 国产 一区 欧美 日韩| 欧美日韩在线观看h| 乱系列少妇在线播放| 国产极品精品免费视频能看的| 好男人视频免费观看在线| 日韩国内少妇激情av| 欧美性猛交╳xxx乱大交人| 国产激情偷乱视频一区二区| 国产精品日韩av在线免费观看| 日韩视频在线欧美| 中文精品一卡2卡3卡4更新| 乱码一卡2卡4卡精品| 精品国产三级普通话版| av线在线观看网站| 亚洲av成人精品一二三区| 国产精品伦人一区二区| 欧美日韩在线观看h| 免费在线观看成人毛片| 欧美又色又爽又黄视频| 国产精品国产三级国产专区5o | 成人亚洲精品av一区二区| 国产一区二区三区av在线| 免费在线观看成人毛片| 人人妻人人澡欧美一区二区| 欧美3d第一页| 日本与韩国留学比较| 最近2019中文字幕mv第一页| 亚洲av中文av极速乱| 亚洲国产精品成人久久小说| 精品人妻偷拍中文字幕| 麻豆成人午夜福利视频| 久久热精品热| 亚洲人与动物交配视频| 2022亚洲国产成人精品| a级毛色黄片| 神马国产精品三级电影在线观看| 午夜激情福利司机影院| 国产亚洲5aaaaa淫片| 99热全是精品| 村上凉子中文字幕在线| 亚洲精品456在线播放app| 久久99精品国语久久久| 久久精品国产99精品国产亚洲性色| 2022亚洲国产成人精品| 欧美3d第一页| 少妇被粗大猛烈的视频| 久久99热6这里只有精品| 国产精品一区二区性色av| 亚洲国产精品成人综合色| 国产在线男女| 亚洲精品日韩av片在线观看| av视频在线观看入口| 男女那种视频在线观看| 神马国产精品三级电影在线观看| 成人漫画全彩无遮挡| 国产91av在线免费观看| 精品一区二区三区人妻视频| 视频中文字幕在线观看| 欧美97在线视频| 亚洲怡红院男人天堂| 国产免费视频播放在线视频 | 亚洲精品日韩av片在线观看| 97热精品久久久久久| 高清视频免费观看一区二区 | 男女啪啪激烈高潮av片| 五月玫瑰六月丁香| 国产亚洲一区二区精品| 国产女主播在线喷水免费视频网站 | 日韩欧美 国产精品| 少妇猛男粗大的猛烈进出视频 | 午夜爱爱视频在线播放| 伦理电影大哥的女人| 久久久精品94久久精品| 国产在视频线在精品| 一夜夜www| 青春草视频在线免费观看| 热99在线观看视频| 国产中年淑女户外野战色| 插逼视频在线观看| 免费看美女性在线毛片视频| 亚洲在线观看片| 在线观看一区二区三区| 精品无人区乱码1区二区| 欧美日韩一区二区视频在线观看视频在线 | 亚洲一区高清亚洲精品| 我的老师免费观看完整版| 久久韩国三级中文字幕| 国产精品不卡视频一区二区| 亚洲av男天堂| 欧美极品一区二区三区四区| 亚洲av中文av极速乱| 偷拍熟女少妇极品色| 又爽又黄a免费视频| 日产精品乱码卡一卡2卡三| 男人和女人高潮做爰伦理| 九草在线视频观看| 久久精品综合一区二区三区| 乱码一卡2卡4卡精品| 日产精品乱码卡一卡2卡三| 2021少妇久久久久久久久久久| 三级男女做爰猛烈吃奶摸视频| 少妇裸体淫交视频免费看高清| 欧美97在线视频| 亚洲怡红院男人天堂| 久久草成人影院| 国产av在哪里看| 亚洲四区av| .国产精品久久| 女人十人毛片免费观看3o分钟| 日韩国内少妇激情av| 国产精品精品国产色婷婷| 最近最新中文字幕大全电影3| 国产不卡一卡二| 国产精品一区二区三区四区久久| 欧美成人一区二区免费高清观看| 欧美激情国产日韩精品一区| 亚洲av电影在线观看一区二区三区 | 午夜精品在线福利| 欧美日本视频| 97在线视频观看| 国产色婷婷99| 国产私拍福利视频在线观看| 亚洲人成网站在线播| 村上凉子中文字幕在线| 三级毛片av免费| 日本免费一区二区三区高清不卡| 简卡轻食公司| 在线观看av片永久免费下载| 亚洲欧美一区二区三区国产| 久久精品人妻少妇| 亚洲欧美中文字幕日韩二区| 91久久精品电影网| 午夜爱爱视频在线播放| 久久久久久九九精品二区国产| 免费观看的影片在线观看| 色网站视频免费| 最后的刺客免费高清国语| 国产熟女欧美一区二区| 午夜老司机福利剧场| 99久久九九国产精品国产免费| 国产黄色小视频在线观看| 亚洲无线观看免费| 淫秽高清视频在线观看| 国产欧美日韩精品一区二区| АⅤ资源中文在线天堂| 啦啦啦观看免费观看视频高清| 在线免费观看的www视频| 久久久久久久久久久丰满| 最新中文字幕久久久久| 国产单亲对白刺激| 午夜福利在线在线| 18禁裸乳无遮挡免费网站照片| 99久久精品一区二区三区| 亚洲精品乱久久久久久| 一边摸一边抽搐一进一小说| 国产精品1区2区在线观看.| 免费大片18禁| 免费观看精品视频网站| 亚洲欧洲国产日韩| 老司机福利观看| 少妇人妻一区二区三区视频| 久久久精品欧美日韩精品| 97热精品久久久久久| 搞女人的毛片| 国产精品一及| 亚洲精品乱码久久久v下载方式| 国产 一区精品| 麻豆精品久久久久久蜜桃| 在线观看av片永久免费下载| 午夜免费激情av| 亚洲成人av在线免费| 舔av片在线| 日日摸夜夜添夜夜爱| 欧美+日韩+精品| 日韩强制内射视频| 51国产日韩欧美| 国产女主播在线喷水免费视频网站 | 国产高清视频在线观看网站| 成年av动漫网址| 欧美日韩精品成人综合77777| 亚洲人与动物交配视频| 日产精品乱码卡一卡2卡三| 最近手机中文字幕大全| 国产精品.久久久| 免费观看性生交大片5| 赤兔流量卡办理| 一级毛片电影观看 | 国产乱人视频| 亚洲成人久久爱视频| 神马国产精品三级电影在线观看| 99热这里只有是精品在线观看| 国产精品福利在线免费观看| 女人被狂操c到高潮| 国产三级中文精品| 超碰97精品在线观看| 2021天堂中文幕一二区在线观| 午夜爱爱视频在线播放| 久久久亚洲精品成人影院| 在线免费十八禁| 久久欧美精品欧美久久欧美| 久久人人爽人人片av| 亚洲成人精品中文字幕电影| 亚洲国产成人一精品久久久| 精品午夜福利在线看| 色尼玛亚洲综合影院| 我的女老师完整版在线观看| 老师上课跳d突然被开到最大视频| 色综合亚洲欧美另类图片| 观看免费一级毛片| 变态另类丝袜制服| 国产一区有黄有色的免费视频 | 日韩欧美精品v在线| 蜜桃久久精品国产亚洲av| av国产免费在线观看| 99热这里只有精品一区| 国产精品av视频在线免费观看| 国产久久久一区二区三区| 日韩精品有码人妻一区| 亚洲天堂国产精品一区在线| 99久久中文字幕三级久久日本| 亚洲av成人精品一区久久| 日韩三级伦理在线观看| 精品国内亚洲2022精品成人| 欧美性猛交黑人性爽| 欧美日韩国产亚洲二区| 免费大片18禁| 一个人看的www免费观看视频| 99久久精品国产国产毛片| 亚洲欧美精品自产自拍| 久久国内精品自在自线图片| 久久精品91蜜桃| 午夜爱爱视频在线播放| 亚洲成人精品中文字幕电影| 中文字幕亚洲精品专区| 免费av毛片视频| 亚洲国产精品国产精品| 在线免费观看的www视频| 天堂网av新在线| 精华霜和精华液先用哪个| 日韩欧美精品v在线| 久热久热在线精品观看| 亚洲自拍偷在线| 免费黄色在线免费观看| 国产三级中文精品| 麻豆乱淫一区二区| 汤姆久久久久久久影院中文字幕 | 色5月婷婷丁香| 少妇裸体淫交视频免费看高清| 两性午夜刺激爽爽歪歪视频在线观看| 嫩草影院新地址| 黄色日韩在线| 久久国内精品自在自线图片| 精品人妻偷拍中文字幕| 色视频www国产| 久久精品夜夜夜夜夜久久蜜豆| 国产乱人偷精品视频| 又粗又硬又长又爽又黄的视频| 天堂av国产一区二区熟女人妻| 成人漫画全彩无遮挡| 国产精品国产高清国产av| 亚洲精品影视一区二区三区av| 伦精品一区二区三区| 91av网一区二区| 国产亚洲午夜精品一区二区久久 | 美女国产视频在线观看| 午夜激情福利司机影院| 久久久久久九九精品二区国产| 成人二区视频| 色吧在线观看| 久久久久久久亚洲中文字幕| 久久久久久久午夜电影| 人人妻人人看人人澡| 高清av免费在线| 在线播放无遮挡| 波野结衣二区三区在线| 日日摸夜夜添夜夜爱| 久久这里有精品视频免费| 亚洲欧美日韩卡通动漫| 永久免费av网站大全| 欧美3d第一页| 久久久久久久久大av| 国产探花在线观看一区二区| 超碰av人人做人人爽久久| 九九在线视频观看精品| 国产成人aa在线观看| 少妇丰满av| 中文在线观看免费www的网站| 一级毛片电影观看 | 3wmmmm亚洲av在线观看| 国产色婷婷99| 久久精品综合一区二区三区| 97超碰精品成人国产| 99国产精品一区二区蜜桃av| 亚洲色图av天堂| 美女cb高潮喷水在线观看| 久久久久久九九精品二区国产| 久久精品国产亚洲网站| 在线观看一区二区三区| 免费观看精品视频网站| 天美传媒精品一区二区| 免费av不卡在线播放| 好男人在线观看高清免费视频| 2021天堂中文幕一二区在线观| 直男gayav资源| 日本猛色少妇xxxxx猛交久久| 精品少妇黑人巨大在线播放 | 插逼视频在线观看|