• <tr id="yyy80"></tr>
  • <sup id="yyy80"></sup>
  • <tfoot id="yyy80"><noscript id="yyy80"></noscript></tfoot>
  • 99热精品在线国产_美女午夜性视频免费_国产精品国产高清国产av_av欧美777_自拍偷自拍亚洲精品老妇_亚洲熟女精品中文字幕_www日本黄色视频网_国产精品野战在线观看 ?

    Effect of a static pedestrian as an exit obstacle on evacuation

    2023-02-20 13:17:04YangHuiHu胡楊慧YuBoBi畢鈺帛JunZhang張俊LiPingLian練麗萍WeiGuoSong宋衛(wèi)國(guó)andWeiGao高偉
    Chinese Physics B 2023年1期
    關(guān)鍵詞:高偉張俊衛(wèi)國(guó)

    Yang-Hui Hu(胡楊慧), Yu-Bo Bi(畢鈺帛), Jun Zhang(張俊),Li-Ping Lian(練麗萍), Wei-Guo Song(宋衛(wèi)國(guó)), and Wei Gao(高偉)

    1School of Chemical Engineering,Dalian University of Technology,Dalian 116024,China

    2State Key Laboratory of Fire Science,University of Science and Technology of China,Hefei 230027,China

    3School of Architectural Engineering,Shenzhen Polytechnic,Shenzhen 518055,China

    4School of Urban Planning and Design,Peking University Shenzhen Graduate School,Shenzhen 518055,China

    Keywords: evacuation,exit obstacle,static pedestrian,pathfinder simulation

    1. Introduction

    With the increase of the urban population and the rapid development of science and technology, modern urban buildings have the characteristics of structural complexity and functional diversity. Meanwhile, building fire accidents occurred frequently (19 people dead and 63 people injured in Bronx apartment building fire in January 2022, 19 people injured in a 30-storey building fire in Abu Dhabi in June 2022, 5 people dead and 44 people injured in a South Korea’s hospital building fire in August 2022), When emergencies such as fire accidents occur, it is great challenges to evacuate crowds from complex buildings efficiently. It is pointed out that failure to evacuate in time was the main cause of casualties in fire accidents.[1]Therefore, how to improve the efficiency of building evacuation has attracted the attention of researchers and managers, such as modifying evacuation strategy,[2]optimizing building structure,[3,4]analyzing pedestrian behaviors,[5,6]etc. Building exits restrict pedestrian movement during evacuation as the bottleneck structure and have a significant impact on evacuation efficiency.[7]Interestingly,some researchers have proposed that the reasonable setting of obstacles at the exit can have a positive impact on the evacuation process.[1,8]

    Researchers have studied the effect of obstacles at the exit on evacuation through experiments and simulations. In terms of experimental research, researchers demonstrated that the positive or negative impact of obstacles on evacuation depends on obstacle sizes,[9]obstacle shapes,[10]the distance between obstacles and the exit,[9]and the height[11]of obstacles and so on. On the one hand, it is found that the reasonable setting of obstacles at the exit can improve evacuation efficiency.For example,Helbinget al. placed a board-shaped obstacle in front of the exit in a controlled experiment and found that the presence of obstacles can reduce the clogging effect at the exit and increase the escape rate.[12]Yanagisawaet al.investigated the effect of exit obstacles on frictional and turning functions on pedestrian outflow through experiments and simulations.Results show that the presence of the obstacle can reduce the number of conflicting pedestrians at the exit. They suggested that placing an obstacle at the exit can improve pedestrian flow.[13]Zhaoet al. studied the impact of exit obstacles on evacuation by varying obstacle numbers, obstacle shapes and distances of obstacle-exit during the experiment. They found that evacuation efficiency can be improved when obstacles are placed in a proper position. The presence of obstacles reduces the density of congested areas by separating space effectively.Compared to a pillar-shaped obstacle, the panel-shaped and double pillar-shaped obstacles have a better effect on improving evacuation efficiency.[10]Shiet al.carried out experiments to investigate the effect of exit obstacles on evacuation efficiency by varying obstacle sizes (0.6 m, 1.0 m), the distance of obstacle exit (0.6 m, 0.8 m, 1.0 m), and locations of the exit(corner,middle). They find that evacuation efficiency can be improved by setting appropriate obstacle size and position of obstacle.[9]On the other hand, some studies indicated that the existence of obstacles has a negative effect on evacuation.Dinget al.conducted experiments to study the impact of a barshaped obstacle with different heights and obstacle-exit distances on room evacuation. Results show that evacuation time is longer in the presence of an obstacle than in the absence of an obstacle.The obstacle-exit distance and height of the obstacle affect evacuation efficiency.[11]Jiaet al. from experiments found that two different trends of egress time with the increase of obstacle size can be observed. When the obstacle is close to the exit,the variation of obstacles does not affect the egress time. When the obstacle is far away from the exit,evacuation time increases with obstacle size. This is mainly due to the influence of the obstacle on the frequency of changing lanes behavior, thus influencing evacuation efficiency.[14]In addition,some researchers pointed out that although the existence of obstacles at the exit can not reduce the evacuation time,obstacles can reduce the development of collective transversal rushes,[15]alleviate the pressure at the exit[16]and stabilize longitudinal crowd waves,[17]which could be as crucial as reducing the evacuation time.

    In terms of the simulation aspect, researchers have reached inconsistent conclusions about the impact of obstacles on evacuation efficiency. Some researchers suggested that the presence of obstacles has a positive effect on evacuation. For example,Helbinget al. found that placing columns asymmetrically in front of the exit can improve outflows and prevent the accumulation of fatal pressures based on a social force model.[18]Yanagisawaet al.investigated the effect of conflicts and turning of exit obstacles on outflow by a floor field model.They found that when congestions appear at the exit,the presence of obstacles has a positive effect on evacuation because the number of conflicts is reduced by obstacles.[19]Jianget al.found that placing pillar-shaped obstacles on both sides of the exit can reduce the tangential momentum and increase the escape speed,so as to maximize the evacuation efficiency by using a social force-based genetic algorithm and experiments.[20]Wanget al. investigated the effect of exit locations,bottleneck lengths,and exit obstacles on pedestrian egress by a modified social force model. Results show that placing obstacles(a barricade obstacle and two-pillar obstacles)near the exit does not increase the evacuation time, but improves the evacuation efficiency. The parameters of obstacles play a decisive role in evacuation efficiency. However,there is no consistent conclusion on which shape of the obstacle is better.[8]Xuet al. studied the effect of a moving obstacle on the evacuation of a single exit room. They found that a moving obstacle can improve evacuation efficiency at different desired velocities. The presence of the moving obstacle increases the pedestrian velocity toward the exit and reduces the crowd density near the exit.[21]On the other hand, some studies indicated that the impact of exit obstacles on evacuation depends on the experimental settings and the attributes of obstacles. For instance,Franket al.investigated the impact of obstacle shapes,obstacle locations,and pedestrians’capacity to avoid obstacles on evacuation efficiency. They suggested that the positive or negative impact of obstacles on evacuation is related to the desired velocity of pedestrians.[22]Yano used a toy model to study the effect of obstacle shapes on evacuation time. It is found that evacuation time is affected by the shape of obstacles. The evacuation time is the shortest in the presence of a circular cylinder obstacle.[23]Zhaoet al.optimized the setting of exit obstacles based on a social model for panic evacuation. The simulation results show that the presence of obstacles can reduce the high density area near the exit and improve evacuation efficiency.The panel-shaped obstacle is more robust to increase evacuation efficiency than the pillar-shaped obstacle.[24]Wanget al.also obtained similar conclusions through experiments and simulations,and the positive effect of obstacles on evacuation depends on obstacle size and distance from the exit. Through sensitive analysis, they found that the influence of distance between obstacle and exit, length and width of the obstacle on evacuation gradually decreased.[1]Liet al.studied the influence of incomplete informed pedestrians on evacuation in the presence of obstacles in room evacuation based on an improved social force model. The positive effect of obstacles on evacuation is related to obstacle sizes,offset distances,and the desired velocity. The presence of obstacles does not reduce evacuation time when pedestrians are not fully aware of the evacuation information.[25]

    To sum up, the positive or negative impact of exit obstacles on evacuation mainly depends on the attributes of the obstacles and the distance of the obstacle-exit. The size of obstacles in the previous research is usually larger than the size of the human body,and their appearances are significantly different from pedestrians. However,in real life,the standing evacuation guides, the elderly at slow speed, injured pedestrians,and pedestrians who stop to look for something(for example:looking for ID cards at the gate,etc.)may act as obstacles near the exit to affect the evacuation process. Compared with nonliving obstacles, the repulsion and unpredictability of pedestrian obstacles by other pedestrians may affect the evacuation process. Research on pedestrians acting as obstacles is insufficient. In this paper,the effect of a static pedestrian as an exit obstacle on building evacuation efficiency under emergency is studied from experiment and simulation. The influence of a static pedestrian on evacuation was studied by varying exit widths, distances between the static pedestrian and the exit,offset distances, and types of obstacles. The structure of this paper is as follows: In Section 2,the experiment settings and experiment results are studied. Software introduction, simulation scenario setup, and simulation results are discussed in Section 3. The conclusions are summarized in Section 4.

    2. Experiment

    This paper focuses on analyzing the dynamic characteristics of pedestrians near the exit. In order to obtain the dynamic characteristics of pedestrians in emergency situations as simulation parameters,we specially carry out experimental research on the area near the exit. Many middle school students were invited to participate in the Activities for Popular Science of a university. Therefore,except for the static pedestrian(an adult with 0.4-m shoulder width),volunteers participating in the experiment were junior school students (with 0.38-m shoulder width) aged 14–16. During the experiment, no volunteers presented or reported physical disabilities. The sketch map of the experiment scenario is shown in Fig.1(a).Pedestrians were asked to evacuate from a 3.9 m×3.9 m square room with two openings, a one-way entrance and a one-way exit.The entrance was located at the upper boundary of the room and the exit was located in the middle of the left boundary of the room.Before the experiment,all the volunteers entered the room through the entrance. During the experiment, only the exit can be used to leave the room. A static pedestrian acted as an obstacle standing in the front of the exit. The distance between the static pedestrian and the exit(d)is 0.8 m.During the experiment, volunteers were asked to leave the room as soon as possible,assuming that there was a fire accident.In order to encourage volunteers to evacuate the room as quickly as possible,a reward plan was carried out. The top three volunteers who left the room in the experiment can get a gift. Therefore,our experiment can be regarded as room evacuation in an emergency. During the experiment,a digital camera was used to record the whole process. Fig. 1(b) is a screenshot of the experimental video. The frame rate of the video is 25 frames per second.

    Fig.1. Details of experiment scenario and results: (a)sketch map of experiment scenario,(b)a video screenshot of experiment scenario,(c)trajectories with the speed of pedestrians,(d)evacuation time of each pedestrian with their initial positions,(e)density profile of experiment,(f)velocity profile of experiment.

    Pedestrian trajectories with speed are shown in Fig.1(c).The color of trajectory indicates the speed of pedestrians. The black dot is the initial position of each pedestrian. It can be seen that the presence of the static pedestrian influences the movement of other pedestrians. Pedestrians make a detour to pass the static pedestrian to reach the exit and the movement speed of pedestrians around the static pedestrian decreases.Figure 1(d) shows the evacuation time of pedestrians at different initial positions. It can be seen that the evacuation time of pedestrians is positively correlated with thex-coordinate of the initial position. That is,the farther away from the exit,the evacuation time the longer.The relationship between the evacuation time and they-coordinate of its initial position is not obvious. Figures 1(e)and 1(f)are the average density profile and average velocity profile in 5 s–15 s of the experiment, it can be seen that high-density areas appear around the exit and the static pedestrian,the existence of obstacles elongates the congested area at the exit. It can be seen from the velocity profile that a low-speed area is formed behind the obstacle pedestrian.However, there is no low-speed area in the high-density area at the exit. This also shows that the existence of the static pedestrian affects the pedestrian dynamic near the exit, then we propose the following assumptions: when the distance between the static pedestrian and the exit is in a certain range,the static pedestrian can alleviate the congestion at the exit,and most pedestrians are congested around the static pedestrian so that the congestion at the exit can be alleviated and the evacuation time can be reduced. When the static pedestrian is too close to the exit, the congestion at the exit overlaps with the congestion around the static pedestrian, which fails to alleviate the congestion at the exit. When the static pedestrian is far away from the exit, two congestion areas will be formed,and the static pedestrians cannot share the congestion at the exit. Whether the static pedestrian can alleviate the congestion at the exit and play an active role in evacuation depends on the distance between the static pedestrian and the exit. We will systematically investigate the effect of this distance on evacuation efficiency in the simulation section.

    3. Simulation

    3.1. Software introduction

    In the field of pedestrian dynamics, researchers have developed much software to simulate the movement of largescale crowds,evaluate the fire safety of buildings,and provide the basis for evacuation plans. For example, MassMotion[26]is based on the social force model,STEPS[27]is based on the cellular automata model, and Pathfinder[28]is based on the agent-based model,etc. Among them, agent-based models have received extensive attention due to their ability to simulate pedestrian behaviors at the micro level, such as interactions between pedestrians and the environment, and the synthesis of collective behaviors and individual behaviors. In this paper, Pathfinder software was employed. Pathfinder evacuation simulation software is developed by Thunderhead engineering and is an agent-based evacuation simulator.[28]The default movement mode of Pathfinder is steering mode. Steering mode combines path planning, and guidance mechanism and avoids collisions allowing more complex pedestrian behaviors. The steering model is used in this paper. Pathfinder software has been used to simulate pedestrian behaviors in a variety of scenarios, such as fire emergency evacuation in a subway station,[29]evacuation model combined with reversal guidance, collision handling and path planning of a commercial center,[30]the effect of stairs wide,landing on the evacuation of a school,[31]optimized evacuation strategy in high-rise buildings.[32]

    3.2. Simulation scenario setup

    We built the same scenario as experiments on the Pathfinder as shown in Fig. 2(a). Cylinders are used to represent pedestrians of 1.65 m in height. The initial setting of simulation scenarios is consistent with experiments,that is,the distance of obstacle-exit and the initial distribution of pedestrians. In addition to shoulder width and walking speed (except for the static pedestrian, who was an adult, all the volunteers were middle school students), the parameters of the static pedestrian are the same as those of other pedestrians.Since the emergency is simulated in our experiment, the values of parameters are adjusted according to the experimental data and literature.[33]The results of the simulation are in good agreement with the experimental results as shown in Fig.2(b)(Mann–Whitney U test, evacuation time, experimentversussimulation:p=0.6172>0.05). The model parameters are shown in Table 1.

    Table 1. Model parameters.

    After obtaining the parameter values, we built a room with 3.9 m×3.9 m as shown in Fig. 2(c), which is the same size as the experimental scenario. Pedestrians are evenly distributed in the room except for the static pedestrian. We study the impact of the static obstacles on evacuation efficiency by considering the following scenes: (i) based on the experiment scenario,studying the influence of different obstacle-exit distances on evacuation efficiency. Details of parameters are shown in Table 2;(ii)considering different ratios of exit width(D) to distance (d); (iii) considering the asymmetry location of the static pedestrian with different offset distances(O)and distances (d); (iv) the difference of the obstacle (First, a regular dodecagonal small room is established at the position of the static obstacle. The distance between any two vertices of the small room is the same as the diameter of the static pedestrian (0.4 m), and the shape is similar to a circle. Secondly,the small room is deleted so that an obstacle is generated at the position where the static pedestrian was originally located)and the static pedestrian. The time when all pedestrians leave the room is defined as evacuation time to indicate evacuation efficiency. Figure 2(d) shows a screenshot of the simulation scenario whenD=0.8 m,d=1.5 m,O=0.2 m, pedestrian number=40.

    Fig.2. Simulation scenario setup: (a)experiment scenario in simulation,(b)evacuation time of experiment and simulation,(c)sketch map of simulation scenarios,(d)a screenshot of one simulation scenario.

    Table 2. Details of parameters in simulation scenes.

    4. Simulation results

    From previous studies, we know that the distance from the obstacle to the exit affects evacuation efficiency.[22,34]Therefore, in our model, the effect of different distances between the static pedestrian and the exit on evacuation efficiency under different global densities were investigated. The evacuation time of differentdis shown in Fig. 3. In addition, the condition without a static pedestrian in the front of the exit(hereafter referred to as no-static-pedestrian)was simulated as the baseline. The evacuation time in the condition of no-static-pedestrian under different global densities is 9.53,20.18,and 31.08 s respectively,which is shown as the dashed line in Fig.3.

    Fig.3. Difference in evacuation time in scenario A.

    When the static pedestrian is too close to the exit, other pedestrians cannot leave the room, so the minimum distance in scenario A is set to 0.5 m. Overall,the evacuation time increases with the number of pedestrians in the room. It can be seen that when there is a static pedestrian as an obstacle in the front of the exit,the evacuation time is affected by the distance between the static pedestrian to the exit(d). With the increase ofd, the evacuation time first decreases and then increases.Whendis equal to 0.6 m, the static pedestrian has a positive effect on evacuation efficiency. When the distance is too small(d=0.5 m)or too large(d=0.8,0.9,1.0 m),the static pedestrian has a negative impact on evacuation efficiency and increases the overall evacuation time. In this paper, whendis equal to 0.6 m(d=0.75D),the evacuation efficiency is the highest.

    In order to study the coupling effect of exit width (D)and distance (d) on evacuation efficiency, simulation parameters were selected according to scenario B in Table 2. WhenD=0.8 m andd=0.5D=0.4 m, the distance (d) and exit width (D) is relatively small, and other pedestrians get stuck around the exit and cannot complete the evacuation. On this occasion,dwas set to 0.5 m andd=0.625D. Figure 4 shows the relation between the number of evacuees and evacuation time(N–T)and flow rate with different ratios ofD/d.

    TheN–Trelation can reflect the evolution of evacuation efficiency with time. As shown in Figs. 4(a)–4(e), the evacuation time was the shortest whend= 0.75Dregardless of the exit width,under the same evacuation time,more pedestrians can be evacuated when the static pedestrian stands at the distance ofd=0.75Dfrom the exit. Figure 4(e) shows the flow rate (number of pedestrians/evacuation time) with differentDandd. It can be seen that the flow rate increases with the increase of the exit width as a whole. In different exit widths, whend=0.75D, the flow rate is the largest and the evacuation efficiency is the highest. Compared with the no-static-pedestrian condition with the same exit width,whend=0.75D,the flow rate increases by 8.6%,7.6%,1.3%,5.4%,and 4.4% from exit width=0.8 to 1.2 m. Whend=1.25D,the flow rate is the lowest, and at this time, the static pedestrian has the greatest negative effect on the evacuation. Only when the exit width is small (0.8 m) andd=0.5D, the minimum flow rate occurs. At this time,d=0.5 m, and the exit width is 0.8 m, which greatly limits the available exit width to other pedestrians,thus reducing the movement efficiency at the exit,increasing the density around the static pedestrian and reducing the overall flow rate. Whend=1.5D, there is little difference in flow rate compared with the no-static-pedestrian condition.

    Fig.4. The N–T relations with different exit widths and flow rate: (a) exit width=0.8 m (in D08d50, d =0.5 m, d =0.625D); (b) exit width=0.9 m;(c)exit width=1.0 m;(d)exit width=1.1 m;(e)exit width=1.2 m;(f)flow rate with different ratios of D/d.

    We summarize the impact of obstacle position and size on evacuation in previous research in Table A1. It can be seen from the table that except for conditions in index 1 and index 2,the size of obstacles is much larger than that of pedestrians which makes it difficult to compare with this study. The result in index 1 is the closest to that in this paper,that is,when the obstacle diameter=0.6 m andd=0.83D,the flow at the exit is the largest. In addition, we also found that it is difficult to compare these papers due to the difference in experiment setting,but in general,they concluded that evacuation efficiency can be increased when the size and position of obstacles are reasonably set.

    In the pedestrian field,researchers have spent a lot of time on the influence of asymmetric structure on pedestrian movement, such as space configuration on dynamics of two merging flows,[35]the effect of symmetry exits layout on evaluation efficiency,[36,37]etc. Similarly, it is found that the asymmetric structure of obstacles in the front of the exit affects the overall evacuation efficiency,such as reducing conflicts at the exit,[38]increasing the escape speed (reducing the tangential momentum),[20]and blocking pedestrians moving.[39]In simulation scenario C,we investigate the effect of the symmetrical structures of the static pedestrian on evacuation efficiency. By shifting the static pedestrian vertically upward,different offset distances (hereafter referred to asO) from 0.1 to 0.5 m were obtained. In order to test that the direction of shift does not affect the evacuation efficiency,the evacuation time of shift the static pedestrian vertically downward by 0.1 m(O=-0.1 m,d=1.0 m)was collected. Mann–Whitney U test was used to test the statistical difference in evacuation time between conditions ofO=0.1 m andO=-0.1 m. The null hypothesis of evacuation times composed of these two conditions are samples from continuous distributions with equal medians. The results (Mann–Whitney U test,p=0.8663>0.05) indicate that there is not enough evidence to reject the null hypothesis and conclude that the shift direction does not affect the evacuation time at the default 5%significance level. The evacuation time in differentOanddis shown in Fig.5.

    Fig.5. Evacuation time with different offset distances.

    It can be seen from Fig.5 that the effect of the asymmetry structure of the static pedestrian on evacuation depends ondandO. In Fig.5(a),compared with the evacuation time under the no-static-pedestrian condition (The orange dashed line),the positive or negative effects of differentOon evacuation time are mainly related tod. Whend=0.75D,regardless the changes ofO,the evacuation time at this time is lower than the evacuation time under the condition of no-static-pedestrian,and the static pedestrian plays an active role in the evacuation process. Compared with the evacuation time under the symmetrical structure of the static pedestrian(O=0 m),whenO=0.1 m,the evacuation time is reduced; asOcontinues to increase (O=0.2, 0.3 m), the existence of the static pedestrian has no positive effect on the evacuation; when shifting the static pedestrian upward and out of the exit area(O=0.4,0.5 m),the influence of the static pedestrian on the evacuation gradually decreases, and the evacuation time is closer to the evacuation time under the condition of no-static-pedestrian.This indicates that a small offset distance can improve evacuation efficiency. The conclusion of our simulation is consistent with that in Ref.[38],that is,the small offset distance has a positive effect on evacuation. By comparing Fig. 5(a) and Fig.6(b),it can be seen that with the change of the horizontal axis,the change of the vertical axis in Fig.5(a)is not as big as that in Fig.5(b). That is,the change of the evacuation time in the samedand differentOis smaller than that in the sameOand differentd. In general,variabledhas a greater impact on evacuation time than variableO.

    Fig.6. Difference between the obstacle and the static pedestrian on(a)flow rate,(b)average speed.

    Figure A1 is the average density profile of 1 s–10 s during the evacuation process when offset distances are 0 m(the left column),0.1 m(the middle column),and 0.3 m(the right column). By comparing these figures, on the whole, whenO=0.3 m, the area of high-density (dark red) is the largest,and whenO=0.1 m,the area of high-density area is the smallest. It can be seen that whenO=0.1 m,the static pedestrian restrains the movement of the pedestrians on the upper side in the figure,and pedestrians on the other side(lower side of the static pedestrian) can leave more quickly and smoothly (The density is greater in the lower side of the static pedestrian than the upper side due to more pedestrians passing by). In order to confirm that a small offset distance can make pedestrians leave the room more smoothly,we calculate the time headway of pedestrians leaving the exit under differentdandOconditions. Time headway is defined as the time interval between two consecutive pedestrians passing through the entrance or exit. The shorter the time headway, the smoother the pedestrian’s movement at the exit or entrance. The boxplot of time headway is shown in Fig. A2, the triangle in the box plot is the mean value of time headway. It can be seen that the average time headway underO=0.1 m conditions is the smallest and underO=0.3 m conditions is the largest, which means that a small offset distance can make pedestrians leave the exit more smoothly. In general, the effect of offset on evacuation mainly depends ond,and a smallOcan play a positive role in evacuation.

    Previous studies have found that the shape of the obstacles (pillar, panel, triangle,etc.) affects the evacuation efficiency.[22,24,40]It is found that pedestrians keep a certain distance from the obstacle in the experiment.[9]However, for static pedestrians, there are no significant differences in appearance between them and other pedestrians. That is to say,other pedestrians may not keep far away from the static pedestrian and can not predict the blocking effect of the static pedestrians. We investigate whether the impact of the static pedestrian with the same attribute on evacuation is the same as that of non-living obstacles. We study the difference in the influence of an obstacle and a static pedestrian on evacuation in scenarioD. We create a regular dodecagonal obstacle (the distance between the two opposite corners of the regular dodecagon is 0.4 m)similar to the shape of the static pedestrian in Pathfinder. Flow rate and average speed under the impact of the obstacle and the static pedestrian are shown in Fig.6.

    It can be seen that the flow rate under the obstacle conditions is significantly larger than that of the static pedestrian conditions. Whend=0.75D, the flow rate is the highest in these two cases, and this conclusion is consistent with the previous conclusion, that is, the positive effect of the static pedestrian on evacuation is the greatest at this time. A possible reason for this is that pedestrians know the existence of the obstacle in advance during the evacuation, and they plan their route in advance to avoid the obstacle, leading to a lower congestion level around the obstacle. We calculate the average speed (movement distance/movement time) under the obstacle and the static pedestrian conditions,as shown in Fig. 6(b). Similarly, we find that the average speed of pedestrians under the obstacle condition is larger than that of the static pedestrian condition. Whendgradually increased(from 0.5 m to 1.5 m), the average speed under the obstacle condition is 12.4%, 6.7%, 20.4%, 12.1%, 9.1% larger than the average speed of the static pedestrians (Mann-Whitney U test,d= 0.5 m:p= 0.3481>0.05;d= 0.75 m:p=0.0448<0.05;d=1.0 m:p=0.0055<0.05;d=1.25 m:p=0.0147<0.05;d=1.5 m:p=0.0266<0.05). This shows that the presence of the obstacle at the exit is more conducive to evacuation than that of the static pedestrian because pedestrians know the existence of the obstacle and plan their routes in advance. Therefore, the impact of the static pedestrian as obstacles and the non-living obstacle on evacuation efficiency is different and needs to be treated separately. For example,in order to prevent the negative impact of static guides or slow-moving people during evacuation time,we can set up obvious signs or warning sounds to warn pedestrians of the existence of obstacles,so as not to hinder the evacuation.

    5. Conclusion

    As the last and most important state of a building evacuation,pedestrian movement at the building exit has attracted attention from researchers. Investigating pedestrian dynamics near the exit can help improve the building evacuation efficiency. For a long time, researchers have mainly focused on the effect of obstacles near the exit on evacuation while ignoring the effect of the stationary pedestrians. However,in the process of leaving or evacuating from buildings, there are slow-moving pedestrians,injured pedestrians,pedestrians who stop to look for something,or guide who act as obstacles during the evacuation process, these static pedestrians may have an impact on the evacuation process. Therefore, we investigated the effect of a static pedestrian on building evacuation through experiments and simulations. Firstly, to obtain simulation parameters,we conducted an experiment in which a static pedestrian was set as an obstacle at the exit.By analyzing the experimental trajectory, evacuation time and density–velocity profiles, it was found that the presence of the static pedestrian has an impact on the movement of other pedestrians and affects the density and velocity distribution in the exit area. Secondly, the simulation parameters were obtained based on experimental data. Simulations were conducted by varying exit width, the distance between the static pedestrian and the exit, offset distance, and types of obstacles. Simulation results show that a static pedestrian and an obstacle have different effects on evacuation.Compared with the presence of the static pedestrian,the flow rate under the obstacle condition is larger. This is because other pedestrians know the existence of the obstacle and make a detour in advance instead of forming congestions around the static pedestrian. Among the five different ratios ofD/d,the evacuation efficiency is the highest whendis equal to 0.75D,and the presence of the static pedestrian has a positive effect on evacuation at this point. The effect of offset distance(the asymmetric structure)on evacuation efficiency is affected by the distance between the static pedestrian and the exit(d). Compared with the symmetry structure of the static pedestrian,the small offset distance is helpful for evacuation. Therefore, we suggest that when there are static pedestrians near the exit, they need to be treated differently from obstacles. When setting up the evacuation guide, to reduce the negative impact on evacuation, the location of the evacuation guide needs to take into account the exit width and the distance of the evacuation guide to the exit. At the same time, when someone falls or there is a stationary pedestrian near the exit, other pedestrians can be prompted by obvious signs and sounds. This study can be used for the development of evacuation strategies and crowd management in the presence of static pedestrians near building exits.

    This study investigates the effect of a static pedestrian on the evacuation process through Pathfinder. It is important to state the limitations of our work. (i) In this paper, only the pedestrian attributes of middle school students,such as movement speed, acceleration and body size, are considered. (ii)The size of the static pedestrian is based on the adult obstacle pedestrian in the experiment. Different obstacle sizes may have different effects on evacuation with small exit width and a small distance between the static pedestrian and the exit.(iii)In the future,relevant validation experiments should be carried out and the impact of the static pedestrian on the entry process should be studied. This study preliminarily studied the impact of the static pedestrian on the evacuation process, especially the different positions and offset distances. We believe that this study provides a theoretical basis for future experimental research and crowd management.

    Appendix A

    Fig.A1. Density profiles with different d and O. the left column: O=0 m;the middle column: O=0.1 m;the right column: O=0.3 m.

    Fig.A2. Time headway with different d and O.

    Table A1. Relevant research about obstacle size and position.

    Acknowledgements

    Project supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant Nos. 52104186, 71904006,U1933105,and 72174189),the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (Grant Nos. DUT21JC01 and DUT2020TB03),and the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities(Grant No.WK2320000050).

    猜你喜歡
    高偉張俊衛(wèi)國(guó)
    玩轉(zhuǎn)課本題
    High-fidelity resonant tunneling passage in three-waveguide system
    許衛(wèi)國(guó)書(shū)法作品選
    Analysis of asymmetry of the Dα emission spectra under the Zeeman effect in boundary region for D–D experiment on EAST tokamak?
    Controlling the light wavefront through a scattering medium based on direct digital frequency synthesis technology*
    秋天的風(fēng)
    金山(2020年3期)2020-04-15 03:56:36
    唐《張俊墓志》考
    Voltage-controlled Kosterlitz–Thouless transitions and various kinds of Kondo behaviors in a triple dot device?
    對(duì)一個(gè)數(shù)學(xué)模型的思考
    Evaluation on nitrogen isotopes analysis in high-C/N-ratio plants using elemental analyzer/isotope ratio mass spectrometry
    久久香蕉国产精品| 国产成人系列免费观看| 美女免费视频网站| 琪琪午夜伦伦电影理论片6080| 色综合站精品国产| 国产成人一区二区三区免费视频网站| 国内久久婷婷六月综合欲色啪| 啦啦啦韩国在线观看视频| 一二三四在线观看免费中文在| 欧美三级亚洲精品| 国产一卡二卡三卡精品| 嫁个100分男人电影在线观看| 人人妻人人澡人人看| 精品久久久久久久久久免费视频| 一二三四在线观看免费中文在| 午夜福利18| 国产欧美日韩精品亚洲av| 日韩av在线大香蕉| 欧美另类亚洲清纯唯美| 一区二区三区国产精品乱码| 悠悠久久av| 国产91精品成人一区二区三区| 叶爱在线成人免费视频播放| 99热6这里只有精品| 午夜免费鲁丝| 亚洲成人久久性| 黄片小视频在线播放| 欧美黑人巨大hd| 99久久综合精品五月天人人| 国产伦在线观看视频一区| 欧美+亚洲+日韩+国产| 哪里可以看免费的av片| 中文字幕人妻熟女乱码| 国产精品电影一区二区三区| 久久精品人妻少妇| 午夜福利免费观看在线| 18禁黄网站禁片午夜丰满| 欧洲精品卡2卡3卡4卡5卡区| 成人亚洲精品av一区二区| 麻豆av在线久日| 久久精品成人免费网站| 男女之事视频高清在线观看| 色播亚洲综合网| 好男人在线观看高清免费视频 | 日本三级黄在线观看| 人妻丰满熟妇av一区二区三区| 高潮久久久久久久久久久不卡| 久久热在线av| 韩国av一区二区三区四区| 又紧又爽又黄一区二区| www.自偷自拍.com| 999久久久国产精品视频| 欧美av亚洲av综合av国产av| 亚洲av美国av| 久久午夜亚洲精品久久| 精品一区二区三区av网在线观看| 午夜两性在线视频| 国产精品二区激情视频| 日本一区二区免费在线视频| 搡老熟女国产l中国老女人| 国产精品久久久久久亚洲av鲁大| 亚洲精品美女久久av网站| www.www免费av| 一本精品99久久精品77| 老司机靠b影院| 亚洲熟妇中文字幕五十中出| 嫩草影院精品99| 天天添夜夜摸| 亚洲第一电影网av| 搡老熟女国产l中国老女人| 成人18禁在线播放| 91在线观看av| 不卡一级毛片| 久久欧美精品欧美久久欧美| 亚洲精品色激情综合| 俄罗斯特黄特色一大片| 日本一区二区免费在线视频| 淫妇啪啪啪对白视频| 一边摸一边做爽爽视频免费| 日韩欧美国产一区二区入口| 丁香欧美五月| 国产一区二区三区视频了| 熟女电影av网| 啦啦啦免费观看视频1| 日日干狠狠操夜夜爽| 国产亚洲欧美精品永久| 色婷婷久久久亚洲欧美| 欧美黑人精品巨大| 日韩大码丰满熟妇| 人妻丰满熟妇av一区二区三区| 好看av亚洲va欧美ⅴa在| 日本五十路高清| 日韩欧美一区视频在线观看| 少妇粗大呻吟视频| 身体一侧抽搐| 国产一级毛片七仙女欲春2 | 亚洲精品在线美女| 午夜福利在线在线| 亚洲精品美女久久久久99蜜臀| 午夜免费观看网址| av在线天堂中文字幕| 黄片大片在线免费观看| 欧美成狂野欧美在线观看| 熟女少妇亚洲综合色aaa.| 亚洲avbb在线观看| 天堂影院成人在线观看| 女人爽到高潮嗷嗷叫在线视频| 在线播放国产精品三级| 色播在线永久视频| 一区二区三区激情视频| 99国产极品粉嫩在线观看| 香蕉av资源在线| 国内毛片毛片毛片毛片毛片| 欧美日韩一级在线毛片| 国产极品粉嫩免费观看在线| 性欧美人与动物交配| 亚洲avbb在线观看| 免费在线观看日本一区| 激情在线观看视频在线高清| 男女午夜视频在线观看| 亚洲男人天堂网一区| 国产伦人伦偷精品视频| 99精品久久久久人妻精品| 欧洲精品卡2卡3卡4卡5卡区| 99国产精品99久久久久| 欧美乱色亚洲激情| 久久香蕉精品热| 人人妻人人澡欧美一区二区| 色在线成人网| 亚洲 国产 在线| www.自偷自拍.com| 2021天堂中文幕一二区在线观 | 91av网站免费观看| 国产av又大| 美女扒开内裤让男人捅视频| 亚洲人成网站高清观看| 成人精品一区二区免费| 国产成人欧美| 国产野战对白在线观看| 99精品欧美一区二区三区四区| 变态另类丝袜制服| 久久亚洲真实| 欧美日韩福利视频一区二区| 午夜精品在线福利| 中文字幕精品亚洲无线码一区 | 久久久国产成人精品二区| 亚洲免费av在线视频| 人妻久久中文字幕网| 日韩欧美国产在线观看| 中文资源天堂在线| 成人国产综合亚洲| 亚洲国产欧美日韩在线播放| 久久久国产欧美日韩av| 少妇粗大呻吟视频| 日韩精品免费视频一区二区三区| 一a级毛片在线观看| 婷婷六月久久综合丁香| 90打野战视频偷拍视频| 久久香蕉激情| 无限看片的www在线观看| 国产蜜桃级精品一区二区三区| 麻豆av在线久日| 精品国内亚洲2022精品成人| 一区福利在线观看| 在线观看免费日韩欧美大片| 色综合婷婷激情| 亚洲国产毛片av蜜桃av| 色播亚洲综合网| 怎么达到女性高潮| 久久精品aⅴ一区二区三区四区| 99国产精品一区二区蜜桃av| 久久青草综合色| 男女午夜视频在线观看| 给我免费播放毛片高清在线观看| av电影中文网址| 男女下面进入的视频免费午夜 | 好看av亚洲va欧美ⅴa在| 午夜福利18| 欧美日韩中文字幕国产精品一区二区三区| 18禁黄网站禁片午夜丰满| 757午夜福利合集在线观看| 黄片小视频在线播放| 午夜激情福利司机影院| 成年版毛片免费区| 91成年电影在线观看| 91麻豆av在线| 欧美一区二区精品小视频在线| 女性生殖器流出的白浆| 中出人妻视频一区二区| 91字幕亚洲| 日本免费a在线| 久久久久精品国产欧美久久久| 亚洲精品在线美女| 99国产精品一区二区蜜桃av| 男男h啪啪无遮挡| 中文字幕人成人乱码亚洲影| 操出白浆在线播放| 亚洲熟女毛片儿| a级毛片a级免费在线| 欧美另类亚洲清纯唯美| 日本免费一区二区三区高清不卡| 69av精品久久久久久| 久久久久精品国产欧美久久久| 岛国在线观看网站| 2021天堂中文幕一二区在线观 | 亚洲国产欧美一区二区综合| 中文字幕精品亚洲无线码一区 | 成人永久免费在线观看视频| 国产成人欧美| 国产精品一区二区三区四区久久 | 91麻豆av在线| 久久久久国产精品人妻aⅴ院| 男人舔奶头视频| 欧美日韩中文字幕国产精品一区二区三区| xxxwww97欧美| 波多野结衣巨乳人妻| 欧美日韩黄片免| avwww免费| 精品乱码久久久久久99久播| 国产欧美日韩一区二区三| 天堂√8在线中文| 国产极品粉嫩免费观看在线| 久久午夜综合久久蜜桃| 亚洲av中文字字幕乱码综合 | 久久中文字幕人妻熟女| 麻豆成人午夜福利视频| 精品国产国语对白av| 18禁观看日本| 黄片小视频在线播放| 亚洲一码二码三码区别大吗| 日韩有码中文字幕| 成年女人毛片免费观看观看9| av片东京热男人的天堂| 99热6这里只有精品| 国产片内射在线| 亚洲欧美精品综合一区二区三区| 午夜免费成人在线视频| 亚洲精品色激情综合| 中国美女看黄片| 亚洲第一电影网av| 久久精品91蜜桃| 国产精品二区激情视频| 久9热在线精品视频| 日日夜夜操网爽| 日韩免费av在线播放| 国产av不卡久久| 非洲黑人性xxxx精品又粗又长| 一级毛片精品| 亚洲专区中文字幕在线| 欧美激情极品国产一区二区三区| 一区二区三区精品91| 成人欧美大片| 色综合亚洲欧美另类图片| 精品无人区乱码1区二区| 黄网站色视频无遮挡免费观看| 成人亚洲精品一区在线观看| 精品久久久久久久久久免费视频| 一级a爱片免费观看的视频| 最近在线观看免费完整版| 国产乱人伦免费视频| 90打野战视频偷拍视频| 久久热在线av| 午夜免费观看网址| 成人18禁在线播放| 国内揄拍国产精品人妻在线 | 欧美性长视频在线观看| 90打野战视频偷拍视频| 日日夜夜操网爽| 亚洲激情在线av| 国产成人欧美在线观看| 午夜福利在线在线| 99久久国产精品久久久| 国产成人欧美| 精品欧美国产一区二区三| 午夜激情av网站| 嫩草影院精品99| 日韩大尺度精品在线看网址| 亚洲片人在线观看| 色av中文字幕| 中文字幕人成人乱码亚洲影| 免费在线观看亚洲国产| 国产爱豆传媒在线观看 | 正在播放国产对白刺激| 婷婷六月久久综合丁香| 精品午夜福利视频在线观看一区| 人人妻,人人澡人人爽秒播| 制服诱惑二区| 一边摸一边做爽爽视频免费| 中国美女看黄片| 在线十欧美十亚洲十日本专区| 免费高清视频大片| 日本三级黄在线观看| 亚洲国产毛片av蜜桃av| 久久久国产成人精品二区| 好男人电影高清在线观看| 给我免费播放毛片高清在线观看| 一级a爱视频在线免费观看| 99国产综合亚洲精品| 精品国产乱子伦一区二区三区| 18禁黄网站禁片免费观看直播| 国产av又大| 女同久久另类99精品国产91| 久久精品成人免费网站| 麻豆成人av在线观看| 一夜夜www| 色综合婷婷激情| 日韩三级视频一区二区三区| 99精品在免费线老司机午夜| 波多野结衣高清作品| 国产精品永久免费网站| 一区福利在线观看| 99热这里只有精品一区 | 亚洲一区二区三区不卡视频| 一个人免费在线观看的高清视频| 怎么达到女性高潮| 亚洲国产欧洲综合997久久, | 波多野结衣高清作品| 国产片内射在线| 男人舔女人下体高潮全视频| 欧美一级毛片孕妇| 日韩成人在线观看一区二区三区| 中文字幕精品亚洲无线码一区 | 亚洲av电影在线进入| 中文字幕人妻熟女乱码| 国产精品精品国产色婷婷| 夜夜夜夜夜久久久久| 岛国在线观看网站| 国产午夜精品久久久久久| 国产熟女午夜一区二区三区| 热re99久久国产66热| 亚洲男人天堂网一区| 在线观看日韩欧美| 美国免费a级毛片| 男女做爰动态图高潮gif福利片| 欧美人与性动交α欧美精品济南到| 日本一本二区三区精品| 99国产极品粉嫩在线观看| 国产精华一区二区三区| 黑人操中国人逼视频| 在线永久观看黄色视频| 免费在线观看亚洲国产| 日韩精品中文字幕看吧| 一a级毛片在线观看| 中文字幕人妻熟女乱码| 亚洲最大成人中文| 岛国视频午夜一区免费看| 两人在一起打扑克的视频| 亚洲国产精品合色在线| 老汉色av国产亚洲站长工具| 精品久久蜜臀av无| 国产亚洲av高清不卡| 国产黄色小视频在线观看| 久久伊人香网站| 久久欧美精品欧美久久欧美| 母亲3免费完整高清在线观看| 久久草成人影院| 少妇 在线观看| 美女高潮到喷水免费观看| 亚洲精品国产一区二区精华液| 日韩中文字幕欧美一区二区| 中文字幕另类日韩欧美亚洲嫩草| 国产伦人伦偷精品视频| 高潮久久久久久久久久久不卡| 一进一出抽搐gif免费好疼| 51午夜福利影视在线观看| 看免费av毛片| 国产野战对白在线观看| 丝袜人妻中文字幕| 99国产精品99久久久久| 国产精品,欧美在线| 99在线视频只有这里精品首页| 中文字幕高清在线视频| 午夜影院日韩av| 欧美成狂野欧美在线观看| 中文字幕av电影在线播放| www日本黄色视频网| 母亲3免费完整高清在线观看| 美女扒开内裤让男人捅视频| 18禁观看日本| 久久精品91无色码中文字幕| 中文字幕高清在线视频| 国产私拍福利视频在线观看| 在线av久久热| 在线观看www视频免费| 18禁美女被吸乳视频| 日韩大尺度精品在线看网址| av欧美777| 日韩一卡2卡3卡4卡2021年| 成人特级黄色片久久久久久久| 国产精品精品国产色婷婷| 夜夜躁狠狠躁天天躁| 久热这里只有精品99| 成年免费大片在线观看| 一区二区三区高清视频在线| 成人午夜高清在线视频 | 午夜免费成人在线视频| av在线播放免费不卡| 俄罗斯特黄特色一大片| 成熟少妇高潮喷水视频| 久热爱精品视频在线9| 亚洲成av片中文字幕在线观看| 18禁裸乳无遮挡免费网站照片 | 国产视频一区二区在线看| 欧美性猛交╳xxx乱大交人| 人妻久久中文字幕网| 久久久久久九九精品二区国产 | 99久久无色码亚洲精品果冻| 精品久久久久久久人妻蜜臀av| 亚洲第一av免费看| 国产日本99.免费观看| 久久久久国产精品人妻aⅴ院| 国产精品,欧美在线| 国产日本99.免费观看| 老汉色∧v一级毛片| а√天堂www在线а√下载| 脱女人内裤的视频| 一区福利在线观看| 久久久精品国产亚洲av高清涩受| 无限看片的www在线观看| 变态另类丝袜制服| 级片在线观看| 精华霜和精华液先用哪个| 非洲黑人性xxxx精品又粗又长| 国产精品1区2区在线观看.| 18禁美女被吸乳视频| 丁香六月欧美| 久久99热这里只有精品18| 精品欧美一区二区三区在线| 久久久久亚洲av毛片大全| 真人一进一出gif抽搐免费| 又紧又爽又黄一区二区| 亚洲七黄色美女视频| 黑人操中国人逼视频| 国产一区二区激情短视频| 黄色丝袜av网址大全| 国产不卡一卡二| 亚洲成国产人片在线观看| 韩国精品一区二区三区| 久久午夜亚洲精品久久| 午夜免费成人在线视频| 99热这里只有精品一区 | 亚洲国产精品合色在线| 久久久久九九精品影院| 国产精品综合久久久久久久免费| 中文字幕精品亚洲无线码一区 | 国产真实乱freesex| 自线自在国产av| 成人手机av| 又紧又爽又黄一区二区| 亚洲久久久国产精品| 啦啦啦 在线观看视频| 老司机靠b影院| 一个人免费在线观看的高清视频| 国产亚洲欧美98| 精品电影一区二区在线| 在线观看午夜福利视频| 日韩国内少妇激情av| av在线天堂中文字幕| 淫妇啪啪啪对白视频| 天天躁狠狠躁夜夜躁狠狠躁| 精品国产乱码久久久久久男人| 亚洲天堂国产精品一区在线| 老熟妇仑乱视频hdxx| 在线观看午夜福利视频| 国产成+人综合+亚洲专区| av有码第一页| 黑人欧美特级aaaaaa片| www日本黄色视频网| 热99re8久久精品国产| 每晚都被弄得嗷嗷叫到高潮| 亚洲国产欧美一区二区综合| 一本综合久久免费| 美女午夜性视频免费| 国产v大片淫在线免费观看| 最好的美女福利视频网| 性欧美人与动物交配| 男女下面进入的视频免费午夜 | 精品不卡国产一区二区三区| 国产欧美日韩一区二区精品| 午夜免费成人在线视频| svipshipincom国产片| 亚洲久久久国产精品| 久久久久免费精品人妻一区二区 | 真人做人爱边吃奶动态| 日本a在线网址| 成人特级黄色片久久久久久久| 18禁裸乳无遮挡免费网站照片 | 国产精品久久视频播放| 久久婷婷成人综合色麻豆| 国产区一区二久久| 18禁国产床啪视频网站| 久久国产亚洲av麻豆专区| 最近最新中文字幕大全免费视频| 亚洲最大成人中文| 香蕉国产在线看| 亚洲精品一区av在线观看| 熟女少妇亚洲综合色aaa.| 1024香蕉在线观看| 国产亚洲精品av在线| 亚洲欧美一区二区三区黑人| 不卡一级毛片| 精品久久蜜臀av无| 波多野结衣高清作品| 欧美乱色亚洲激情| 大香蕉久久成人网| 亚洲自拍偷在线| 观看免费一级毛片| 亚洲九九香蕉| 变态另类成人亚洲欧美熟女| 操出白浆在线播放| 久久亚洲精品不卡| 国产激情欧美一区二区| 日韩av在线大香蕉| 丝袜在线中文字幕| 老司机福利观看| 免费高清视频大片| 女性被躁到高潮视频| 精品欧美国产一区二区三| 天天躁狠狠躁夜夜躁狠狠躁| 天堂影院成人在线观看| 琪琪午夜伦伦电影理论片6080| 搡老熟女国产l中国老女人| 在线观看午夜福利视频| 国产精品久久久久久亚洲av鲁大| 99久久精品国产亚洲精品| 97人妻精品一区二区三区麻豆 | 天天躁狠狠躁夜夜躁狠狠躁| 国产高清videossex| 国产精品九九99| 香蕉久久夜色| 两性夫妻黄色片| 亚洲国产精品sss在线观看| 一本精品99久久精品77| 香蕉丝袜av| 久久精品91蜜桃| 国产成人欧美在线观看| 亚洲熟妇中文字幕五十中出| 757午夜福利合集在线观看| 久久久久九九精品影院| 亚洲成人精品中文字幕电影| 久久国产精品人妻蜜桃| 午夜亚洲福利在线播放| 免费在线观看影片大全网站| 国产亚洲欧美精品永久| 在线天堂中文资源库| 亚洲最大成人中文| 欧美日韩一级在线毛片| 久热这里只有精品99| 色播在线永久视频| 欧美成人一区二区免费高清观看 | 国产精品1区2区在线观看.| 一级作爱视频免费观看| 久久亚洲精品不卡| 精品卡一卡二卡四卡免费| 久久久久国内视频| 亚洲成人精品中文字幕电影| 制服人妻中文乱码| 叶爱在线成人免费视频播放| 999久久久精品免费观看国产| 老司机午夜十八禁免费视频| 国产欧美日韩一区二区三| 女人爽到高潮嗷嗷叫在线视频| 1024视频免费在线观看| 亚洲精品一区av在线观看| 男女那种视频在线观看| 狠狠狠狠99中文字幕| 欧美日韩黄片免| 国产亚洲欧美精品永久| 久久久国产精品麻豆| 欧美成人午夜精品| 久久草成人影院| 欧美激情极品国产一区二区三区| 成人国产综合亚洲| 非洲黑人性xxxx精品又粗又长| 一区二区日韩欧美中文字幕| 9191精品国产免费久久| 给我免费播放毛片高清在线观看| 日韩成人在线观看一区二区三区| 欧美久久黑人一区二区| 亚洲一码二码三码区别大吗| 大型黄色视频在线免费观看| 成人18禁在线播放| 91av网站免费观看| 日韩欧美 国产精品| 国产精品永久免费网站| 久久人妻福利社区极品人妻图片| 麻豆成人av在线观看| 国产成人欧美在线观看| 国产一区二区激情短视频| 女同久久另类99精品国产91| 免费看日本二区| 亚洲熟妇熟女久久| 麻豆成人av在线观看| 国产成人欧美在线观看| 国产一区二区激情短视频| 欧美成人午夜精品| 久久久久国产一级毛片高清牌| 一二三四社区在线视频社区8| 一本综合久久免费| 国产真实乱freesex| 免费av毛片视频| 亚洲午夜理论影院| 色播亚洲综合网| 亚洲成人免费电影在线观看| 国产精品美女特级片免费视频播放器 | 日本三级黄在线观看| 村上凉子中文字幕在线| 国产v大片淫在线免费观看| 欧美黑人精品巨大| 看免费av毛片| 欧美性猛交╳xxx乱大交人| 午夜激情av网站| 制服诱惑二区| 亚洲欧美日韩无卡精品| 级片在线观看|