• <tr id="yyy80"></tr>
  • <sup id="yyy80"></sup>
  • <tfoot id="yyy80"><noscript id="yyy80"></noscript></tfoot>
  • 99热精品在线国产_美女午夜性视频免费_国产精品国产高清国产av_av欧美777_自拍偷自拍亚洲精品老妇_亚洲熟女精品中文字幕_www日本黄色视频网_国产精品野战在线观看 ?

    廣東鶴山南亞熱帶植被重建對土壤動物群落的影響

    2016-12-27 03:22:46徐國良方碧真周麗霞劉占鋒
    關(guān)鍵詞:草坡亞熱帶廣州大學(xué)

    徐國良, 方碧真, 周麗霞, 劉占鋒

    (1. 廣州大學(xué) 地理科學(xué)學(xué)院, 廣東 廣州 510006;2. 中國科學(xué)院華南植物園, 廣東 廣州 510650)

    廣東鶴山南亞熱帶植被重建對土壤動物群落的影響

    徐國良1, 方碧真1, 周麗霞2, 劉占鋒2

    (1. 廣州大學(xué) 地理科學(xué)學(xué)院, 廣東 廣州 510006;2. 中國科學(xué)院華南植物園, 廣東 廣州 510650)

    恢復(fù)生態(tài)學(xué)常常聚焦于地上變化過程,卻較少關(guān)注地下過程,尤其是土壤動物的響應(yīng).文章對中國南亞熱帶鶴山一個持續(xù)了6 a,占地50 hm2的生態(tài)恢復(fù)實驗中的土壤動物群落進行了研究.結(jié)果發(fā)現(xiàn),在此生態(tài)重建階段,由于人工純林郁閉度過大及外來樹種的負面效應(yīng),多數(shù)測試指標(biāo)都顯示了對照灌叢草坡處理效應(yīng)的優(yōu)勢.草坡樣地土壤動物整體群落密度和土壤螨密度顯著高于厚莢相思林和尾葉桉林.不同的恢復(fù)措施對土壤動物類群豐富度也有顯著影響.尾葉桉林中的土壤動物類群數(shù)顯著低于對照草坡和鄉(xiāng)土紅椎林;厚莢相思林中的土壤跳蟲類群豐富度和多樣性也顯著低于草坡和鄉(xiāng)土紅椎林.混交林對土壤動物群落沒有明顯的影響.對環(huán)境因子的測試分析表明,灌叢草坡樣地蕨類蓋度和土壤pH值顯著高于其他各處理樣地;而在厚莢相思林中,發(fā)現(xiàn)土壤水分偏低.本研究表明,在中國南亞熱帶地區(qū)自然恢復(fù)具有較好的生態(tài)效應(yīng);然而,相對來說,外來速生樹種對土壤生態(tài)系統(tǒng)恢復(fù)表現(xiàn)了一些負效應(yīng).

    生態(tài)恢復(fù); 土壤動物; 南亞熱帶; 鶴山

    The serious degraded environment began in the 50~60 s’ last century due to the much requirement on natural resources, which proceeded the development of restoration ecology[1]. The degradation of environment also developed very fast in China, and many related studies have been conducted[2-3]. It is necessary to develop strategies of forests restoration for biodiversity protection or productive land uses. Given the sparse knowledge of tropical forests, particularly highly disturbed tropical forests, it is even more significant to conduct researches to promote our understanding of tropical ecosystems and informs selection of restoration strategies in this area[4].

    Different trees with different ecological and physiological properties can yield different recoverage results, because of the varied responses of biota and abiota factors of the ecosystem. The selection of plantation species will depend on local management objectives and the ecological characteristics of the candidate species. Because of recolonizing easily after disturbances and fast-growing to reforest, exotic species have been widely used to ameliorate harsh site conditions[5]. For example, legumes are widely used to help restore degraded soils because of the nitrogen-rich leaf litter and its biological nitrogen fixation belowground[6]. However, the use of exotic species, is in great dispute at the same time[5]. Non-native exotic species colonization and invasion were recognized as one of the most serious ongoing ecological problems[7]. For example, the plantation ofEucalyptusinduces significant changes of the vegetation development and soil characteristics, and microbial communities by the influence of allelochemicals[8]. In recent years, due to increasing concerns on biodiversity, native species plantation was encouraged in establishing “Ecological forests” in southern China.

    Present restoration studies focused mostly only on the responses aboveground, and little attention on the belowground[9]. The relationships between vegetation community aboveground and decomposer biodiversity belowground have received much attention over the past years[10-11]. The bottom-up control of plantation on soil organisms have been studied in many researches, In fact, there are vast biodiversity belowground and soil biota fulfill important functions on the ecosystem in the soil[12-13], and the vegetation pattern aboveground will affect the fauna community belowground. In a microcosm experiment in Germany, the resource inputs by manipulations in plant species and functuional compositions affected differently the decomposer groups(earthworms, springtails and microorganisms)[14]. CHAUVAT, et al. reported that Collembola were relatively to changes in environmental conditions in four different successional phases of spruce forest stands[15], and suggested that substantial ecosystem-level implications of changes in the soil food web during forest rotation. At the same time, soil fauna can act good indicators for the environmental changes[16].

    This study was conducted in southern subtropical China. In this area, there are vast natural biodiversity, and also serious land degrading with the economic development. Many restoration researches on the plants, microbials, physical and chemical soil characteristics have been reported, however, little is still known about the responses of soil fauna community to different reforestation models. In the present study, we selected five reforestation models, including two exotic and fast-growing tree monoculture plantationsEucalyptusurophylla(Myrtaceae) andAcaciacrassicarpa(Leguminosae), a native tree species monoculture plantationCastanopsishystrix(Fagaceae), a mixture native tree species plantation, and a natural restoration shrubland as control, to evaluate the ecological effects on soil fauna. We hypothesize that fast-growing exotic tree plantations are beneficial for the build-up of soil organic matter, and subsequently, in favor of soil biota.

    1 Methods and materials

    1.1 Site description

    This study was conducted at Heshan station (112 °54′ E, 22 °41′ N, 0~90 m a.s.l.), which is located in Heshan County, Guangdong Province, China. Heshan station is one of the core stations of the Chinese Ecological Research Network (CERN) of the Chinese Academy of Sciences (CAS). The climate is subtropical monsoon with a distinct wet season (from April to September, mean temperature 29.2℃) and dry season (from October to March, mean temperature 12.6℃). The mean annual temperature is 21.7℃, and the mean annual precipitation is 1 700 mm. The soil is an acrisol, with soil texture being 42.3% sand, 23.8% silt, and 18.8% clay.

    In 2005, an ecological restoration project was initiated on a degraded hilly land with an area of 50 hm2. In March, on an area of 50 hm2, degraded Masson pine (Pinusmassoniana) plantation was cut and residues were burned on sites. We established the following five reforestation models: ① exotic tree speciesEucalyptusurophylla(EU); ② exotic tree speciesAcaciacrassicarpa(AC); ③ native tree speciesCastanopsishystrix(CH); ④ 10 mixed native tree species (MS); ⑤ natural recovering shrubland (SL). Each restoration model was replicated three times, forming 15 experimental plots in total. All 15 plots were randomly distributed in the 50 hm2of study area. As to planting, tree saplings in tube stocks with similar height (50~100 cm) were planted at 3 m×2 m spacing in each plot. In mixture treatments, different species were planted randomly.

    1.2 Vegetation description of the five reforestation treatments

    In October, 2011, the vegetation composition all over the site was investigated, and the results showed in Table 1.Dicranopterisdichotomais the most representative understory species on this site.

    1.3 Soil fauna sampling and measurements

    Soil fauna samples were taken in July 27~August 1, 2011, 6 years after the initiation of restoration treatments. 3 sites were randomly selected in each plot. One sample in each site was taken by compositing 3 soil cores (5 cm in diameter, 15 cm in depth). So, there were 9 mixed samples for each treatment, and 45 samples of soil fauna altogether were collected in this study.

    The samples were brought to laboratory immediately and fauna were collected using Tullgren dry funnels. All specimens were sorted and counted by a dissecting microscope (Leika, German), and were identified by Nikon Biological Microscope Eclipse 80i (Nikon, Tokyo, Japan). All Collembola individuals were classified to species level, and the identification was referred to the keys in “Checklist of the Collembola of the world”[17], as well as those in POTAPOV[18], BRETFELD[19], POMORSKI[20]. All other soil fauna individual numbers were counted and identified to lower taxa, which were treated as a group in the analysis to provide a better understanding of the community response to disturbance.

    1.4 Soil properties and microbial community

    In October, 2011, samples were collected to determine physical and microbial characteristics. Similarily, 3 sites were chosen randomly in each site, and 3 soil cores in each site were taken and mixed to one sample. There are 9 samples for each treatment and 45 samples altogether. The samples were taken back to laboratory and were divided into half: one part was used for physical and the other was used for PLFAs analysis. The soil microbial community was characterized by using phospholipids fatty acids (PLFAs) analysis as described by BOSSIO, et al.[21]. Soil samples collected for physical analyses were ground to pass through a 2 mm sieve. Total nitrogen (TN) concentration was measured after micro-Kjeldahl digestion using a flow injection autoanalyser (FIA, Lachat Instruments, USA). Soil organic carbon (SOC) was measured with the Walkley-Black method[22]. Soil pH was determined by using a 1∶25(wt/vol) ratio of soil to deionized water. Soil water content (SWC %, g of water per 100 g dry soil) was measured by oven-drying for 48 h at 105℃.

    Table 1 Vegetation description of the five reforestation treatments

    1.5 Statistical analyses

    It is a randomly chosen design with 3 replicated plots and 9 replicated samples. The effects of the plantations on soil fauna density, richness and diversity, and soil physical and microbial characteristics were tested by one-way ANOVA. Data were transformed (natural log, square root, or rank) to meet assumptions of normality and homogeneity of variance. LSD multiple comparison was used to test the differences among the treatments. All tests were considered to be significant atP<0.05 level. SPSS 13.0 was used for all analyses. The relationships between environmental variables and soil fauna properties were analyzed by CCA using CANOCO software for Windows 45 (Ithaca, NY, USA). Forward selection was based on Monte Carlo permutation (n=499).

    2 Results

    2.1 Vegetation coverage and soil properties

    The vegetations were greatly changed by the forest managements (P<0.001). The fern coverage was significantly higher in the shrublands than in the other plantations (P<0.05). On the contrary, the fern coverage was significantly lower inA.crassicarpathan in other plantations (P<0.05). However, the woody coverage was significantly higher inA.Crassicarpathan that in shrubland and native species plantations (P<0.05), and it was significantly lower in shrubland than all other plantations (P<0.05).

    The 6 years of rehabilitation also caused some changes in the soil properties. It was found that the average pH value in control was 4.14, which was significantly higher than all the other plantations and indicated positive changes in the degraded and acidifying area. On the other hand, the soil water content was significantly lower inA.crassicarpathan inC.hystrix(Table 2).

    Table 2 Vegetation coverage and soil properties in the five rehabilitation vegetations

    SWC: Soil water content.

    2.2 Soil fauna density

    There were significant effects of the restoration treatments on the density of total soil fauna community and the community of Collembola and mites(Fig.1). The individuals of total fauna community, and Oribatida in shrublands andC.hystrixwere significantly more than that inA.crassicarpaandE.urophysella. There were significant higher density of soil mite in shrublands andC.hystrixthan inA.crassicarpa. The density of Collembola inC.hystrixwere significant higher than that inA.crassicarpaandE.urophysella.

    Fig.1 Effects of plantation type on soil fauna density

    2.3 Soil fauna group richness and diversity

    Soil fauna group richness and diversity was also significantly affected by the different restoration treatments(Fig.2). Soil fauna groups inE.urophysellawere significantly lower than in shrublands, native plantation ofC.hystrix, and the mixture plantation of native species. There were significant higher soil fauna groups inC.hystrixthan in exotic plantations ofE.urophysellaandA.crassicarpa. The diversity of Collembola in shrublands,C.hystrix, and the mixture plantation of native species was significant higher than that inA.crassicarpa.

    Fig.2 Effects of plantation type on the group richness and diversity of soil fauna

    2.4 Effects of environmental factors on soil fauna

    CCA on soil fauna data constrained by vegetation data was performed to quantify the effects of vegetation and soil on the variation in soil fauna community composition(Fig.3). All the measured vegetation and plant properties together could explain 34.7% of the soil fauna community community variation. Variables explaining the largest statistically significant amount of variation were herb cover, soil micorbial biomass carbon (unpublished data), soil water content and AM PLFAs (unpublished data).

    In Fig.3, samples are labeled according to vegetation types. The symbols of circle, square, diamond, box and cross represent the samples from shrubland, plantations ofAcaciacrassicarpa,Eucalyptusurophylla,Castanopsishystrix, and Mixed native species.

    3 Discussion

    3.1 The positive responses of soil fauna in shrublands

    Different reactions of soil fauna community to the rehabilitation treatments were detected, and it was astonishing to find significant advantages of soil fauna in control shrubland plots. They have the greatest variety of individuals, and almost all the indexes in shrublands were significantly higher than those in exotic plantationsE.urophyllaorA.crassicarpa. In the shrublands the understory vegetation was greatly flourishing, of which the fernDicranopterisedichotomadominated and was significantly more than that in all the other plantations. Understory vegetation was proved to have marked biomass, especially in younger stands, which can affects seed germination and it dispersers by constituting an adapted micoclimates and habits[23]. NILSSON and WARDLE reviewed recent researches in the boreal forest of northern Sweden to highlight the ecological role of understory vegetation as an ecosystem driver[24]. The ecological advantages of shrublands were also showed in other studies conducted in the site. It was found that theDicranopterisedominated understory had significant positive effects on soil microbial community, abundance of total, fungivorous and plantparasitic nematodes, and was proposed a major driver of intensive forest ecosystem in the humid subtropical and tropical regions[25].

    Fig.3 CCA of soil fauna community composition constrained by plant and soil properties in different vegetation types

    According to the results of soil properties and CCA analysis, the fern coverage, soil water content and pH were closely related to the soil fauna community. They were all superior in the shrublands.D.dichotomais a dominant species of the understory in this site, which acted as early-stage colonizers in primary succession of acidic and oligotrophic soils distributing widely in humid subtropical and tropical regions of the world[25].D.dichotomain the area formed inconceivable indusaeform understory layer, which is in high-density and difficult to go through. At the same time, it produces also a thick layer of rhizomes and meshed roots on the soil surface occupying the whole humid layer, which constituted also complex econiches. Soil temperature would markedly increase 2~3℃ without the cover ofD.dichotoma[26]. The shrublands had also significantly higher soil water content due to the relative lower soil temperature, depression of evaporation by the dense rhizomes and fern canopy. Soil moisture has often been reported to be the most important environmental variable affecting both the structure and function of the soil fauna community[27]. In addition, we found that soil pH in the shrublands significantly increased compared with other plantations after 6 years restoration. pH is critical important to organisms, and would cause significant effects on the colony and survival of plants and invertebrates. For example, Collembola absorb free acidic water by mouth, skin and vertral tube, and the fecundity, egg production and hatchability were all adapted to only a certain pH environment[28]. In our experimental site, the lateritic soil is heavy acidified by vegetation degradation and acidic deposition. The improvement of soil pH was sure to be beneficial to the soil ecosystem. At last, the greatly complex and thick root sphere would logically stimulate the development of soil invertebrates in shrublands. Because the exudation and decomposition of fine roots supply energy and other resources to the soil biota, and most biotic activity in soil occurs in the rhizosphere[13], as was also confirmed by a isotope label experiment in Switzerland[29]. All the same, we thought, the amelioration of soil microclimates, soil condition and rhizosphere might produced more soil fauna individuals and diversity in shrublands than in the other treatments. This study might indicate the potentiality of forest restoration by nature in this area, and the simple protection from disturbance might be enough to facilitate the ecosystem regeneration.

    3.2 Negative effects of exotic fast-growing species

    In contrast to shrublands, we found disadvantages of soil fauna community in both exotic fast-growing plantations. All the indexes, including individuals and group numbers of the whole community, soil mites density, Collembola density and diversity were significantly lower inE.urophyllaandA.crassicarpathan in shrublands or nativeC.hystrixplantation.

    Fast-growing and N-fixing legumes are widely used in afforestation. Because they may be the species easier to recolonize after disturbances, and they are though to be beneficial to the harsh soil condition through the production and decomposition of nitrogen-rich leaf litter[5]. However, it was inconsistent with this study. We found the negative effects ofA.crassicarpaon soil amelioration, at least in the early stages of reforestation. There were significantly lower individuals and group richness of soil fauna, and also soil pH and soil water content. It might be related to the significantly higher arboreal coverage, and the dense and large size of leaves. The canopy caused markedly less light puncture to the ground, and shaded out many of the understory plants, because light intensity may be the crucial environmental factor determining the composition and structure of understory vegetation[6]. There was significantly lower fern coverage inA.crassicarpathan that in all the other treatments. Absence of the advantages of shrubs on soil ecosystem mentioned above might caused the small soil fauna community. The negative effects ofA.crassicarpamight reflect the benefits of understory layer in the soil restoration on the contrary side.

    Eucalyptuswas widely used in subtropical China in plantations. However, it was in great dispute because of the allelopathic effects, largely due to the biodiversity concern, for example plant community structure and composition[5]. There was significantly higher arboreal coverage inE.urophyllathat other plantations because of the fast-growth (Table 1). In contrast toA.crassicarpa, because of the high stem, small leaf and thin canopy, arboreal coverage did not obviously inhibit light puncturing. The fern coverage inE.urophyllawas relatively high and SWC was not different from shrublands andC.hystrix. The markedly negative responses of soil fauna inE.urophyllamight be due to the allelopathic effects. Although we could not find related studies on the effects ofEucalyptusallelochemicals on soil fauna, it was illustrated much in other biota.Eucalyptuscould dramatically alter the vegetation development through the release of allelochemicals[30]. The allelopathic effects ofEucalyptusspecies have been much reported in previous studies[30-31]. It was proved that certain phenolic acids and volatile oils released from the leaves, bark and roots ofEucalyptusspp. act as allelopathic agents inhibiting plants growth and mycorrhizal colonization[30-31]. In this study, soil microbial biomass carbon and AM fungi was found significantly related to the soil fauna data, and it was lower inE.urophyllathan that in shrublands. Similarly, TEDERSOO et al. reported thatEucalyptusspp. (i.e., E. robusta) could contract ectomycorrhizal associations in their introduction area with most of the native ectomycorrhizal symbionts[32], andE.urophyllaplanted soil significantly reduces the early growth and ectomycorrhization of native seedlings in Madagascar[5].

    Most Collembola and Oribatida are mycophagous with preference for grazing the hyphae of mycorrhizal fungi[33-34]. For example, five needle-excavating oribatid species may need particular fungi to make oviposition possible[35]. Therefore, the negative responses of microbial might also contribute to the reduction of soil fauna. This study also implied the negative effects ofEucalyptuson biodiversity.

    3.3 Potential value of revegetation of degraded lands in subtropical China

    Varied restoration strategies have been suggested in many studies[1-2]. It is difficult to decide a standard model. However, an important consideration when planning a restoration project is the local condition. In our area, we found the natural recoverage mainly by fern developed very fast because of the adequate precipitation and sunshine. The flourishing fern community produced the biggest soil fauna community. It was consistent with the positive results under the shrubs in the same area for litter decomposition, fungal biomass and the ratio of fungal biomass to bacterial biomass, and plant-parasitic nematodes[25].

    Plantation of native speciesC.hystrixalso showed significantly positive effects on soil fauna. However, XU et al. found the smallest soil fauna community in the native species plantation nearby after restoration for 20 years[36]. It was due to the slowly and same-step growing canopy which produced very thick and close crowns making light difficult to penetrate to the ground. The dark condition shaded out more understories than all other treatments. Therefore, we think, the positive effects of native speciesC.hystrixin this study might only be due to the slow growth in the early stage of plantation, which made the understory indifferent to the shrublands.

    Although it is common to use exotic species during the revegetation of degraded lands, and it may be even necessary in some area to assist the restoration process where mining or severe overgrazing have resulted in loss of soil fertility to cause sterile exotic grasses to quickly establish cover. For example, Lugo provided observational evidence that exotic trees successfully ameliorated the degraded environmental conditions and stimulated the establishment of native tree species[37]. In addition, exotic fast-growing and N-fixing species were also considered to be nurse plants, whose higher levels of humidity and partial shade provide conditions suitable for seedling establishment, and can facilitate understory growing beneath their canopies[38]. However, the negative effects of exotic species should not be neglected, just as many studies proposed[5,8,39 ]. It was confirmed by our study. The results did not show the advantages of fast-growing species. In contrast, just because of the fast growth, it shaded out significantly the understory plants and then inhibited the soil improvement.

    On the other hand, natural restoration is considered to be ecologically optimum among all kinds of restoration strategies[38]. Naturally recovered forest is superior to plantations in soil and water conservation, ecosystem stability, microclimates improvements, biodiversity increase, etc. VIEIRA and SCARIOT demonstrated that in seasonally dry tropical forests it was high potential to natural recovery because of the high proportion of small seeded, wind-dispersed species, the high ability of sprouting after disturbance, and the relatively simple community diversity and structure. In the eastern deciduous forests of the United States, natural regeneration after farmland abandonment produced widely forests succession largely similar (although younger) in structure to pre-disturbance forests. SKEEL, et al. suggested that physiological and vegetative performances of three native prairie grasses were all well adapted to the strip mine soils in Colorado and could act as viable alternative to nonnative plantings typically planted in these sites for restoration[40]. In the same area, consisting with this study, LIN, et al. proposed that degraded land could develop its understory very fast with fine ecological efficiency[41], and soil nutrients and water conservation by natural restoration could reach very fast to the level of zonal vegetation in a related short time only by area protection[38]. In conclusion, our study proved that natural restoration is valuable, because the fast development of understory provides more adapted microclimates for soil amelioration. At least, it was available in subtropical area with adequate precipitation and temperature.

    [1] GAYNOR V. Prairie restoration on a corporate site[J]. Restor Reclam Rev, 1990, 1(1): 35-40.

    [2] ZHAO P, PENG S L,ZHANG J W. Restoration ecology: An effective way to restore biodiversity of degraded ecosystems[J]. Chin J Ecol, 2000,19(1): 53-58.(in Chinese)

    [3] BAO W K, LIU Z G, LIU Q. Ecological restoration and rehabilitation: Development, researching features and existing major problems[J]. The World’s Sci Tech Res Devel, 2001, 23(1):44-48.(in Chinese)

    [4] HOLL K D, LOIK M E, LIN E H V, et al.Tropicalmontane forest restoration in Costa Rica: Overcoming barriers to dispersal and establishment[J]. Restor Ecol, 2000(8): 339-349.

    [5] D′ANTONIO C, MEYERSON L A. Exotic plant species as problems and solutions in ecological restoration: A synthesis[J]. Restor Ecol, 2002(10): 703-713.

    [6] DUAN W, REN H, FU S, et al. Community comparison and determinant analysis of understory vegetation in Six Plantations in South China[J]. Restor Ecol, 2010(18): 206-214.

    [7] VITOUSEK P M, D’ANTONIOC M, LOOPEL L, et al. Introduced species: a significant component of human-caused global change[J]. New Zealand J Ecol, 1997(21):1-16.

    [8] DEL-MORAL R, MULLER CH. The allelopathic effects ofEucalyptuscamaldulensis[J].Am Midl Nat, 1970(83):254-282.

    [9] PAVAO-ZUCKERMAN M A. The nature of urban soils and their role in ecological restoration in cities[J]. Restor Ecol, 2008, 16(4): 642-649.

    [10]HOOPER D U, BIGNELL D E, BROW N V K, et al. Interactions between aboveground and belowground biodiversity in terrestrialecosystems: patterns, mechanisms, and feedbacks[J].Bioscience, 2000(50): 1049-1061.

    [11]WARDLE DA, BARDGETT RD, KLIRONOMOS JN, et al.Ecological linkages between aboveground and belowground biota[J]. Science, 2004(304): 1629-1633.

    [12]RUSEK J. Biodiversity of Collembola and their functional role in the ecosystem[J]. Biodiv Conserv, 1998(7): 1207-1219.

    [13]FITTER AH,GILLIGAN C A,HOLLINGWORTH K, et al. Biodiversity and ecosystem function in soil[J]. Funct Ecol, 2005(19): 369-377.

    [14]ALEXANDRU M,STEPHAN P, REINHARDT L, et al. The response of decomposers (earthworms, springtails and microorganisms) to variations in species and functional group diversity of plants[J]. OIKOS, 2006(112): 513-524.

    [15]CHAUVAT M, ZAITSEVA S, WOLTERS V.Successional changes of Collembola and soil microbiota during forest rotation[J].Oecologia, 2003(137):269-276.

    [16]XU G L, SCHLEPPI P, LI M H, et al. Negative responses of Collembola in a forest soil (Alptal) under increased atmospheric N deposition[J]. Envir Poll, 2009(57): 2030-2036.

    [17] JANSSENS F. Checklist of the Collembola of the world[EB/OL][2012-06-15]. http://www.collembola.org/.

    [18]POTAPOV M. Isotomidae[C]∥DUNGER W. Synopses on Palaearctic Collembola. G?rlitz, Germany, 2001(3): 603.

    [19]BRETFELDG.Symphypleona[C]∥DUNGER W. Synopses on Palaearctic Collembola. G?rlitz, Germany, 1999(2): 318.

    [20]POMORSKI R J. Onychiurinae of Poland (Collembola: Onychiuridae)[M]. Wroclaw: Polish Taxonomical Society, 1998:1-201.

    [21]BOSSIO D A, SCOW K M. Impacts of carbon and flooding on soil microbial communities: Phospholipid fatty acid profiles and substrate utilization patterns[J]. Microb Ecol, 1998(35): 265-278.

    [22]LIU G S, JIANG N H, ZHANG L D, et al. Soil physical and chemical analysis and description of soil profiles[M]. Beijing: Standards Press of China, 1996.(in Chinese)

    [23]ALABACK P B. Dynamics of understory biomass in Sitkasprucewestern hemlock forests of Southeast Alaska[J]. Ecology, 1982(63):1932-1948.

    [24] NILSSON MC, WARDLE DA. Understory vegetation as a forest ecosystem driver: Evidence from the northern Swedish boreal forest[J]. Front Ecol Envir,2005(3): 421-428.

    [25]ZHAO J, WANS Z, LI Z, et al. Dicranopteris-dominated understory as major driver of intensive forest ecosystem in humid subtropical and tropical region[J]. Soil Biol Bioch, 2012(49): 78-87.

    [26]LIU Z F, WU J P, ZHOU L X, et al. Effect of understory fern (Dicranopterisdichotoma) removal on substrate utilization patterns of culturable soil bacterial communities in subtropicalEucalyptusplantations[J]. Pedobiologia, 2012(55): 7-13.

    [27]XU G L, KUSTER TM, Günthardt-GOERG MS, et al. Seasonal exposure to drought and air warming affects soil collembola and mites[J]. PLOS ONE, 2012, 7(8): 1-6.

    [28]RUSEK J, MARSHALL VG. Impacts of airborne pollutant on soil fauna[J]. Ann Rev Ecol System, 2000(31): 395-423.

    [29]POLLIERER M M, LANGEL R, K?RNER C, et al. The underestimated importance of belowground carbon input for forest soil animal food webs[J]. Ecol Lett, 2007(10): 729-736.

    [30]DEL-MORAL R, MULLER CH. The Allelopathic effect ofEucalyptuscamaldulensis[J]. Amer Midl Natur, 1969, (83): 254-282.

    [31]FORRESTER DI, BAUHUS J, COWIE AL, et al. Mixed-species plantations of eucalyptus with nitrogen-fixing trees: A review[J]. Forest Ecol Manag, 2006(233): 211-230.

    [32]TEDERSOO L, SUVI T, BEAVER K, et al. Ectomycorrhizal fungi of the Seychelles: diversity patterns and host shifts from the nativeVateriopsisseychellarum(Dipterocarpaceae) andIntsiabijuga(Caesalpiniaceae) to the introducedEucalyptusrobusta(Myrtaceae), but notPinuscaribaea[J]. New Phytol, 2007(175):321-333.

    [33]HOPKIN S P. Biology of the Springtails-Insecta: Collembola[D]. Oxford: Oxford University, 1997.

    [34]MARAUN M, MIGGE S, SCHAEFER M, et al. Selection of microfungal food by six oribatid mite species (Oribatida, Acari) from two different beech forests[J]. Pedobiologia,1998(42): 232-240.

    [36]XU G L, ZHOU G Y, MO J M. Changes of soil fauna with forest restoration in Subtropical China[J]. Zool Res, 2006, 27(1): 23-28.(in Chinese)

    [37]LUGO A E. The future of the forest: ecosystem rehabilitation in the tropics[J]. Environment, 1988(30): 41-45.

    [38]REN H,DU W B,WANG J, et al. The natural restoration of degraded rangeland ecosystem in Heshan hill land[J]. Acta Ecol Sin, 2007, 27(9): 3593-3600.(in Chinese)

    [39]TEDERSOO L, SUVI T, BEAVER K, et al. Ectomycorrhizal fungi of the Seychelles: diversity patterns and host shifts from the nativeVateriopsisseychellarum(Dipterocarpaceae) andIntsiabijuga(Caesalpiniaceae) to the introducedEucalyptusrobusta(Myrtaceae), but notPinuscaribaea[J]. New Phytol, 2007(175):321-333.

    [40]SKEEL V A, GIBSOND J. Physiological performance ofAndropogongerardii,PanicumvirgatumandSorghastrumnutanson reclaimed mine spoil[J]. Restor Ecol,1996(4):355-367.

    [41]LIN Y B, REN H, PENG S L. The community structure of degraded grassland in Heshan City[J]. Ecol Sci, 2000, 19(3): 23-26.(in Chinese)

    【責(zé)任編輯: 陳 鋼】

    Effects of forest rehabilitation managements on soil fauna community in southern subtropical Heshan, Guangdong of China

    XUGuo-liang1,FANGBi-zhen1,ZHOULi-xia2,LIUZhan-feng2

    (1.School of Geographical Sciences, Guangzhou University, Guangzhou 510006, China;2.South China Botanical Garden, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Guangzhou 510650, China)

    Restoration ecology has focused mainly on the vegetations aboveground, but few belowground, especially on soil fauna. Responses of soil fauna to 6 years of rehabilitation experiment in Heshan, subtropical China, 50 hm2area were reported in this study.It was found that the soil ecosystems were greatly changed by the forest managements. Because of the large canopy density of the plantations and the negative effects of exotic species, most of the results showed positive responses in the control shrublands during the experimental period.The density of total community and soil mites in shrublands were significantly higher than those inAcaciacrassicarpaandEucalyptusurophylla, and Collembola individuals inCastanopsishystrixwere significantly more than those inA.crassicarpaandE.urophylla.Soil fauna group richness was also significantly affected by the restoration treatments. Soil fauna groups inE.urophysellawere significantly lower than those in shrublands andC.hystrix, and species richness and diversity of Collembola inA.crassicarpawere significantly lower than that in shrublands andC.hystrix.There was no obvious effect of the mixture plantation on soil fauna community.The environmental analysis showed that the fern coverage and the average soil pH value were significantly higher in the shrublands than in the other plantations. Soil water content was negative inA.crassicarpa.The study indicated the ecological advantages of natural restoration in subtropical China and negative ecological effects of exotic fast-growing species on soil ecosystem in different ways.

    ecological restoration; soil fauna; southern subtropical zone; Heshan

    ET 471 Document code: A

    Foundation items: This work was supported by Natural Science Foundation of China(41571247),Guangdong Natural Science Foundation (2014A030313532),and High Level University Construction Project of Guangdong Province.

    1671- 4229(2016)05-0056-10

    Q 151.2

    A

    Received date: 2016-07-15; Revised date: 2016-07-23

    Biography: XU Guo-liang (1975-),male,Ph. D. E-mail: xugl@gzhu.edu.cn

    猜你喜歡
    草坡亞熱帶廣州大學(xué)
    唐布拉草原六月的太陽
    吐魯番(2023年2期)2023-12-11 07:38:40
    廣州大學(xué)作品選登
    A Tale of Two Cities:Creating city images through “Shanghai Police Real Stories” and“Guard the Liberation West”
    《亞熱帶農(nóng)業(yè)研究》2019年征稿簡則
    戶撒刀
    安慰
    致白發(fā)
    詩選刊(2016年2期)2016-05-23 09:55:42
    《廣州大學(xué)學(xué)報( 社會科學(xué)版) 》2016 年( 第15 卷) 總目次
    亞熱帶水果深加工技術(shù)獲突破
    中國果菜(2015年2期)2015-03-11 20:01:08
    兩種亞熱帶森林土壤甲烷氧化活性的垂直分布特征
    伊人久久大香线蕉亚洲五| 国产精品 国内视频| 久久欧美精品欧美久久欧美| 日本在线视频免费播放| 又爽又黄无遮挡网站| 黄片大片在线免费观看| 午夜福利免费观看在线| 国产精品av视频在线免费观看| 国产一区二区三区在线臀色熟女| 巨乳人妻的诱惑在线观看| 成人特级黄色片久久久久久久| 无限看片的www在线观看| 91大片在线观看| 欧美成人免费av一区二区三区| 国产成人欧美在线观看| 久久久久久亚洲精品国产蜜桃av| 国产v大片淫在线免费观看| 亚洲人与动物交配视频| 亚洲七黄色美女视频| 中文字幕熟女人妻在线| 久久精品夜夜夜夜夜久久蜜豆 | 日日摸夜夜添夜夜添小说| 国内久久婷婷六月综合欲色啪| 欧美一级毛片孕妇| 午夜激情福利司机影院| 麻豆国产av国片精品| 69av精品久久久久久| 九九热线精品视视频播放| 深夜精品福利| avwww免费| 精品电影一区二区在线| 两个人的视频大全免费| 欧美日韩精品网址| 又黄又爽又免费观看的视频| 超碰成人久久| 日韩欧美在线乱码| 成人一区二区视频在线观看| 久久人妻av系列| 久久草成人影院| 中文字幕精品亚洲无线码一区| 精品久久久久久久末码| 午夜免费激情av| 嫁个100分男人电影在线观看| 久久久久久久精品吃奶| 免费看美女性在线毛片视频| 长腿黑丝高跟| 五月玫瑰六月丁香| 国产精品一区二区三区四区久久| 亚洲av成人av| 国产精品久久久久久精品电影| 国产欧美日韩一区二区三| 搡老岳熟女国产| 在线永久观看黄色视频| 亚洲国产欧洲综合997久久,| 亚洲精品美女久久av网站| 亚洲18禁久久av| 天天添夜夜摸| а√天堂www在线а√下载| 国产成人精品久久二区二区91| 精品国产乱码久久久久久男人| 99国产综合亚洲精品| 制服丝袜大香蕉在线| 亚洲九九香蕉| 国产高清有码在线观看视频 | 久久久久性生活片| 97超级碰碰碰精品色视频在线观看| 日本撒尿小便嘘嘘汇集6| 在线看三级毛片| 成人亚洲精品av一区二区| 中文字幕最新亚洲高清| 国产av一区在线观看免费| 成人18禁在线播放| 九色国产91popny在线| 免费观看精品视频网站| 可以在线观看毛片的网站| 国产午夜精品论理片| 欧美精品亚洲一区二区| 欧美三级亚洲精品| 国产一级毛片七仙女欲春2| 国产一区二区三区视频了| 久久久久久九九精品二区国产 | 久久久久久久精品吃奶| 男人的好看免费观看在线视频 | 三级男女做爰猛烈吃奶摸视频| 久久香蕉精品热| 亚洲国产精品sss在线观看| 无遮挡黄片免费观看| 亚洲美女黄片视频| 一a级毛片在线观看| 黄色女人牲交| 日韩 欧美 亚洲 中文字幕| 国产亚洲精品第一综合不卡| 此物有八面人人有两片| 2021天堂中文幕一二区在线观| 午夜免费成人在线视频| 国产成人系列免费观看| 久久精品人妻少妇| 日本 av在线| 亚洲国产欧洲综合997久久,| 丝袜美腿诱惑在线| 国产精品久久久久久人妻精品电影| 岛国在线免费视频观看| 听说在线观看完整版免费高清| 欧美性猛交╳xxx乱大交人| 非洲黑人性xxxx精品又粗又长| 18美女黄网站色大片免费观看| 精品免费久久久久久久清纯| 欧美成人一区二区免费高清观看 | 亚洲九九香蕉| 日日干狠狠操夜夜爽| 亚洲精品久久国产高清桃花| 很黄的视频免费| 欧美日韩一级在线毛片| 给我免费播放毛片高清在线观看| 成年人黄色毛片网站| 99热6这里只有精品| 色av中文字幕| 成年女人毛片免费观看观看9| 欧美丝袜亚洲另类 | 午夜福利在线在线| 国产精品久久久久久亚洲av鲁大| 久久国产乱子伦精品免费另类| 巨乳人妻的诱惑在线观看| 亚洲片人在线观看| 国产av一区二区精品久久| 九色成人免费人妻av| 欧美黑人精品巨大| 日韩欧美三级三区| 91麻豆精品激情在线观看国产| 久久久水蜜桃国产精品网| 亚洲专区中文字幕在线| 中文字幕熟女人妻在线| 亚洲一码二码三码区别大吗| 动漫黄色视频在线观看| 亚洲男人的天堂狠狠| 午夜福利成人在线免费观看| xxx96com| 黑人欧美特级aaaaaa片| 搞女人的毛片| 国产高清视频在线播放一区| 色在线成人网| 黄片小视频在线播放| 听说在线观看完整版免费高清| 午夜亚洲福利在线播放| 一本一本综合久久| 国产69精品久久久久777片 | 精品久久久久久久久久久久久| 成人精品一区二区免费| 婷婷亚洲欧美| 国产精品影院久久| 88av欧美| 精品免费久久久久久久清纯| 午夜免费激情av| 老司机午夜福利在线观看视频| 久久热在线av| 女人爽到高潮嗷嗷叫在线视频| 精品一区二区三区视频在线观看免费| 伊人久久大香线蕉亚洲五| 久久精品aⅴ一区二区三区四区| 老汉色av国产亚洲站长工具| 一个人免费在线观看电影 | 一边摸一边抽搐一进一小说| 热99re8久久精品国产| 午夜福利成人在线免费观看| 免费在线观看日本一区| 欧美精品啪啪一区二区三区| 亚洲人成网站在线播放欧美日韩| 午夜福利高清视频| 久久精品国产亚洲av香蕉五月| 九色成人免费人妻av| 制服丝袜大香蕉在线| 毛片女人毛片| aaaaa片日本免费| 亚洲欧洲精品一区二区精品久久久| 黑人操中国人逼视频| 久久国产精品影院| 97碰自拍视频| 久久中文看片网| 亚洲av熟女| 久久久久性生活片| 欧美久久黑人一区二区| 国产精品亚洲美女久久久| 欧美日韩黄片免| 在线观看一区二区三区| 波多野结衣高清作品| 黄色视频,在线免费观看| 男人的好看免费观看在线视频 | 999久久久精品免费观看国产| av国产免费在线观看| 女生性感内裤真人,穿戴方法视频| 久久精品国产亚洲av高清一级| 两性夫妻黄色片| 色av中文字幕| 日韩欧美在线乱码| 黄色成人免费大全| www.自偷自拍.com| 午夜a级毛片| 国产av不卡久久| 男女之事视频高清在线观看| 这个男人来自地球电影免费观看| 国产单亲对白刺激| 窝窝影院91人妻| 黄色成人免费大全| 别揉我奶头~嗯~啊~动态视频| 日本撒尿小便嘘嘘汇集6| 91老司机精品| 不卡一级毛片| 国产精品,欧美在线| 亚洲成人国产一区在线观看| 国产av不卡久久| 国产精品久久视频播放| 亚洲成人久久爱视频| 99精品在免费线老司机午夜| 亚洲在线自拍视频| 国内精品久久久久精免费| 亚洲成av人片在线播放无| 国产精品免费视频内射| 天天躁夜夜躁狠狠躁躁| 国产免费av片在线观看野外av| 午夜福利免费观看在线| 大型av网站在线播放| 三级毛片av免费| 欧美另类亚洲清纯唯美| 亚洲 欧美一区二区三区| 小说图片视频综合网站| 18禁黄网站禁片免费观看直播| 亚洲av成人av| 日日干狠狠操夜夜爽| 国内精品久久久久久久电影| 99热这里只有是精品50| 成年版毛片免费区| 色在线成人网| 嫩草影院精品99| 可以在线观看的亚洲视频| 精品久久久久久久久久免费视频| 午夜激情av网站| 精品久久久久久,| videosex国产| 国产欧美日韩一区二区精品| 中文在线观看免费www的网站 | 亚洲av成人av| 又大又爽又粗| 精品久久久久久成人av| 亚洲最大成人中文| 欧美日本亚洲视频在线播放| 亚洲av成人av| 欧美乱妇无乱码| 亚洲av成人精品一区久久| 国产精品免费视频内射| 国产真人三级小视频在线观看| 亚洲性夜色夜夜综合| 欧美日韩一级在线毛片| 黄色丝袜av网址大全| 老司机在亚洲福利影院| 国产又色又爽无遮挡免费看| av在线天堂中文字幕| 久久久精品国产亚洲av高清涩受| 午夜精品一区二区三区免费看| 欧美成人午夜精品| 一a级毛片在线观看| 国产伦人伦偷精品视频| 国产成人av教育| 91老司机精品| 欧美三级亚洲精品| 宅男免费午夜| 亚洲精品久久国产高清桃花| 夜夜夜夜夜久久久久| 免费一级毛片在线播放高清视频| 动漫黄色视频在线观看| 香蕉av资源在线| 18美女黄网站色大片免费观看| 色综合欧美亚洲国产小说| 亚洲国产欧美网| 999久久久国产精品视频| 久久久水蜜桃国产精品网| 后天国语完整版免费观看| 亚洲欧美日韩高清在线视频| 一区二区三区激情视频| 日韩欧美一区二区三区在线观看| 18禁美女被吸乳视频| 国产欧美日韩一区二区精品| 久久国产精品人妻蜜桃| 国产精品免费视频内射| 亚洲精品久久成人aⅴ小说| 色播亚洲综合网| 99久久综合精品五月天人人| 在线国产一区二区在线| 日韩免费av在线播放| 国产高清视频在线观看网站| 久久久久国内视频| 熟女少妇亚洲综合色aaa.| 不卡av一区二区三区| 日韩成人在线观看一区二区三区| 淫秽高清视频在线观看| 欧美日韩一级在线毛片| 精品第一国产精品| 天天一区二区日本电影三级| 国产精品久久久av美女十八| av有码第一页| 在线观看免费日韩欧美大片| 伦理电影免费视频| 免费无遮挡裸体视频| 午夜福利18| 91av网站免费观看| 欧美中文日本在线观看视频| 国产精品亚洲美女久久久| av天堂在线播放| 色综合站精品国产| 一进一出抽搐动态| 黄色毛片三级朝国网站| 一进一出抽搐gif免费好疼| 亚洲18禁久久av| 一边摸一边抽搐一进一小说| 国内久久婷婷六月综合欲色啪| 激情在线观看视频在线高清| 村上凉子中文字幕在线| 极品教师在线免费播放| 夜夜夜夜夜久久久久| 中文字幕高清在线视频| 一区二区三区高清视频在线| 19禁男女啪啪无遮挡网站| 欧美日韩一级在线毛片| 看片在线看免费视频| 色哟哟哟哟哟哟| 国产欧美日韩精品亚洲av| 成人手机av| 日韩大尺度精品在线看网址| 99re在线观看精品视频| 久久久国产精品麻豆| 国产区一区二久久| 亚洲自偷自拍图片 自拍| 久久精品aⅴ一区二区三区四区| 18美女黄网站色大片免费观看| 午夜久久久久精精品| 国产亚洲精品久久久久久毛片| 亚洲av成人av| 中文字幕精品亚洲无线码一区| 国产伦一二天堂av在线观看| 亚洲美女视频黄频| 国产精品 国内视频| 日本一本二区三区精品| 久久久久久免费高清国产稀缺| 亚洲激情在线av| 久久性视频一级片| 免费观看精品视频网站| 亚洲真实伦在线观看| 老鸭窝网址在线观看| 黄色丝袜av网址大全| 国产视频一区二区在线看| 亚洲激情在线av| 久久九九热精品免费| 人妻丰满熟妇av一区二区三区| 国内少妇人妻偷人精品xxx网站 | 婷婷精品国产亚洲av在线| 午夜福利免费观看在线| 桃色一区二区三区在线观看| 在线十欧美十亚洲十日本专区| 亚洲激情在线av| 在线观看日韩欧美| 亚洲av成人一区二区三| 97人妻精品一区二区三区麻豆| 成人午夜高清在线视频| 在线播放国产精品三级| 亚洲 欧美 日韩 在线 免费| 琪琪午夜伦伦电影理论片6080| 97超级碰碰碰精品色视频在线观看| 国产亚洲精品一区二区www| 久久久国产欧美日韩av| 免费搜索国产男女视频| 午夜精品一区二区三区免费看| 三级男女做爰猛烈吃奶摸视频| 日韩欧美 国产精品| 国产一区二区三区在线臀色熟女| 丝袜人妻中文字幕| 欧美国产日韩亚洲一区| 精品国产超薄肉色丝袜足j| 亚洲av日韩精品久久久久久密| 又爽又黄无遮挡网站| 一区二区三区激情视频| a级毛片a级免费在线| 欧美成人免费av一区二区三区| 亚洲熟女毛片儿| 久久香蕉国产精品| 夜夜夜夜夜久久久久| 午夜激情av网站| 亚洲精品粉嫩美女一区| 久久久精品国产亚洲av高清涩受| 欧美 亚洲 国产 日韩一| 两个人免费观看高清视频| 亚洲欧美日韩高清专用| 特级一级黄色大片| 99热只有精品国产| 桃色一区二区三区在线观看| 白带黄色成豆腐渣| 麻豆国产97在线/欧美 | 国产亚洲精品av在线| 日本 av在线| 亚洲成人久久爱视频| 757午夜福利合集在线观看| 欧美午夜高清在线| 国产成人av教育| 精品福利观看| 色综合站精品国产| svipshipincom国产片| 精品电影一区二区在线| 亚洲av熟女| 脱女人内裤的视频| 一a级毛片在线观看| 国产熟女午夜一区二区三区| 午夜日韩欧美国产| 亚洲精品久久成人aⅴ小说| 香蕉国产在线看| 99久久99久久久精品蜜桃| 国内揄拍国产精品人妻在线| 99精品久久久久人妻精品| 欧美 亚洲 国产 日韩一| 深夜精品福利| 婷婷丁香在线五月| 黄色成人免费大全| 宅男免费午夜| 首页视频小说图片口味搜索| 亚洲国产高清在线一区二区三| 叶爱在线成人免费视频播放| 一本精品99久久精品77| 午夜免费成人在线视频| 1024视频免费在线观看| 国产aⅴ精品一区二区三区波| netflix在线观看网站| 他把我摸到了高潮在线观看| 午夜激情福利司机影院| 亚洲专区国产一区二区| 90打野战视频偷拍视频| 亚洲精品国产一区二区精华液| 人人妻,人人澡人人爽秒播| 禁无遮挡网站| 男女做爰动态图高潮gif福利片| 此物有八面人人有两片| 久久亚洲精品不卡| 久久久国产精品麻豆| 亚洲色图 男人天堂 中文字幕| 精品久久久久久成人av| 午夜日韩欧美国产| 每晚都被弄得嗷嗷叫到高潮| 成人三级黄色视频| 欧美黑人欧美精品刺激| а√天堂www在线а√下载| 免费在线观看成人毛片| 国产激情欧美一区二区| 变态另类成人亚洲欧美熟女| 国产亚洲精品第一综合不卡| 久久中文字幕人妻熟女| 亚洲av美国av| 国产伦人伦偷精品视频| 国产成人av激情在线播放| 18禁黄网站禁片免费观看直播| 久9热在线精品视频| www日本在线高清视频| 变态另类丝袜制服| 精品一区二区三区四区五区乱码| 亚洲欧美精品综合一区二区三区| www.999成人在线观看| 成人三级做爰电影| 亚洲专区中文字幕在线| 麻豆av在线久日| 99精品在免费线老司机午夜| 亚洲专区中文字幕在线| 国产一区二区激情短视频| 国产成人av教育| 黑人欧美特级aaaaaa片| 动漫黄色视频在线观看| 国产精品av视频在线免费观看| 岛国在线免费视频观看| 正在播放国产对白刺激| 国产精品久久久久久久电影 | 亚洲av日韩精品久久久久久密| 精品欧美国产一区二区三| 99精品在免费线老司机午夜| 久久人人精品亚洲av| 精品免费久久久久久久清纯| www国产在线视频色| 白带黄色成豆腐渣| 丰满的人妻完整版| 麻豆国产av国片精品| 一级毛片女人18水好多| 老司机靠b影院| АⅤ资源中文在线天堂| tocl精华| 看黄色毛片网站| av天堂在线播放| 黄色视频,在线免费观看| e午夜精品久久久久久久| 一级毛片高清免费大全| 男人舔奶头视频| 在线观看美女被高潮喷水网站 | 精品不卡国产一区二区三区| 久久天堂一区二区三区四区| 久久亚洲真实| 亚洲天堂国产精品一区在线| 熟女电影av网| 嫩草影院精品99| 久久伊人香网站| 国产精品综合久久久久久久免费| 国产精品av久久久久免费| 精品久久久久久久久久久久久| 亚洲 国产 在线| 中国美女看黄片| 麻豆一二三区av精品| 亚洲精品久久成人aⅴ小说| 国产真实乱freesex| 日本熟妇午夜| 久久久水蜜桃国产精品网| 国产单亲对白刺激| 妹子高潮喷水视频| av视频在线观看入口| 黄色毛片三级朝国网站| 日韩 欧美 亚洲 中文字幕| 久9热在线精品视频| 婷婷亚洲欧美| 麻豆国产97在线/欧美 | 丁香六月欧美| 精华霜和精华液先用哪个| 午夜精品在线福利| 熟妇人妻久久中文字幕3abv| 99在线人妻在线中文字幕| 校园春色视频在线观看| 日韩免费av在线播放| 99国产精品一区二区蜜桃av| 久久久久精品国产欧美久久久| 亚洲 国产 在线| 午夜福利视频1000在线观看| 两性午夜刺激爽爽歪歪视频在线观看 | 国内少妇人妻偷人精品xxx网站 | 色噜噜av男人的天堂激情| 成人手机av| 日本熟妇午夜| 国产精品日韩av在线免费观看| 欧美中文综合在线视频| 久久久久亚洲av毛片大全| 中国美女看黄片| 99久久99久久久精品蜜桃| 人人妻人人澡欧美一区二区| 日本一二三区视频观看| 亚洲自偷自拍图片 自拍| 亚洲精品色激情综合| 久久草成人影院| 在线a可以看的网站| 亚洲av第一区精品v没综合| 久久人妻av系列| 国产一区在线观看成人免费| 午夜福利在线观看吧| 成人精品一区二区免费| 久久99热这里只有精品18| 亚洲人与动物交配视频| 精品少妇一区二区三区视频日本电影| 国产一区二区三区在线臀色熟女| 午夜久久久久精精品| 国产精品影院久久| 禁无遮挡网站| 精品福利观看| 中文字幕熟女人妻在线| 亚洲av电影不卡..在线观看| 日韩欧美国产一区二区入口| 国产亚洲av嫩草精品影院| 激情在线观看视频在线高清| 亚洲国产欧美人成| 中文字幕最新亚洲高清| 国产又色又爽无遮挡免费看| av福利片在线| 国产午夜福利久久久久久| a级毛片在线看网站| 欧美日韩瑟瑟在线播放| 黄色视频,在线免费观看| 脱女人内裤的视频| 国产私拍福利视频在线观看| 欧美丝袜亚洲另类 | 国产一区二区激情短视频| 国产久久久一区二区三区| 婷婷精品国产亚洲av在线| 精品熟女少妇八av免费久了| 国产亚洲av高清不卡| 国内毛片毛片毛片毛片毛片| 波多野结衣巨乳人妻| 中文字幕人妻丝袜一区二区| 亚洲天堂国产精品一区在线| 国产一区在线观看成人免费| 老司机午夜十八禁免费视频| 麻豆久久精品国产亚洲av| 日韩大码丰满熟妇| 亚洲最大成人中文| 叶爱在线成人免费视频播放| 99精品在免费线老司机午夜| 国产高清视频在线观看网站| √禁漫天堂资源中文www| 国产在线观看jvid| 特大巨黑吊av在线直播| 国产精品久久久av美女十八| 在线观看免费午夜福利视频| 精品一区二区三区视频在线观看免费| 一边摸一边抽搐一进一小说| 免费在线观看视频国产中文字幕亚洲| 国产精品日韩av在线免费观看| 99热这里只有是精品50| 少妇被粗大的猛进出69影院| 成年女人毛片免费观看观看9| 97碰自拍视频| 午夜精品久久久久久毛片777| 在线观看66精品国产| 欧美成人性av电影在线观看| 日韩国内少妇激情av| 日本a在线网址| 欧美绝顶高潮抽搐喷水| 一个人免费在线观看电影 | 久久午夜综合久久蜜桃| 亚洲,欧美精品.| 国产精品永久免费网站|