• <tr id="yyy80"></tr>
  • <sup id="yyy80"></sup>
  • <tfoot id="yyy80"><noscript id="yyy80"></noscript></tfoot>
  • 99热精品在线国产_美女午夜性视频免费_国产精品国产高清国产av_av欧美777_自拍偷自拍亚洲精品老妇_亚洲熟女精品中文字幕_www日本黄色视频网_国产精品野战在线观看 ?

    Verification and validation of URANS simulations of the turbulent cavitating flow around the hydrofoil*

    2017-09-15 13:55:49YunLong龍云XinpingLong龍新平BinJi季斌WenxinHuai槐文信ZhongdongQian錢忠東
    水動力學研究與進展 B輯 2017年4期
    關鍵詞:龍云新平

    Yun Long (龍云), Xin-ping Long (龍新平), Bin Ji (季斌), Wen-xin Huai (槐文信), Zhong-dong Qian (錢忠東)

    1.State Key Laboratory of Water Resources and Hydropower Engineering Science, Wuhan University, Wuhan 430072 China

    2.HubeiKey Laboratory of Waterjet Theory and New Technology, School of Power and Mechanical Engineering, Wuhan University, Wuhan 430072, China

    3.Science and Technology on Water Jet Propulsion Laboratory, Shanghai 200011, China, E-mail: whulongyun@whu.edu.cn

    Verification and validation of URANS simulations of the turbulent cavitating flow around the hydrofoil*

    Yun Long (龍云)1,2,3, Xin-ping Long (龍新平)1,2, Bin Ji (季斌)1,2,3, Wen-xin Huai (槐文信)1, Zhong-dong Qian (錢忠東)1

    1.State Key Laboratory of Water Resources and Hydropower Engineering Science, Wuhan University, Wuhan 430072 China

    2.HubeiKey Laboratory of Waterjet Theory and New Technology, School of Power and Mechanical Engineering, Wuhan University, Wuhan 430072, China

    3.Science and Technology on Water Jet Propulsion Laboratory, Shanghai 200011, China, E-mail: whulongyun@whu.edu.cn

    In this paper, we investigate the verification and validation (V&V) procedures for the URANS simulations of the turbulent cavitating flow around a Clark-Y hydrofoil. The main focus is on the feasibility of various Richardson extrapolation-based uncertainty estimators in the cavitating flow simulation. The unsteady cavitating flow is simulated by a density corrected model (DCM) coupled with the Zwart cavitation model. The estimated uncertainty is used to evaluate the applicability of various uncertainty estimation methods for the cavitating flow simulation. It is shown that the preferred uncertainty estimators include the modified Factor of Safety (FS1), the Factor of Safety (FS) and the Grid Convergence Index (GCI). The distribution of the area without achieving the validation at theUvlevel shows a strong relationship with the cavitation. Further analysis indicates that the predicted velocity distributions, the transient cavitation patterns and the effects of the vortex stretching are highly influenced by the mesh resolution.

    Cavitating flow, cavitation, verification and validation (V&V), uncertainty

    Introduction

    In the past, much attention was paid on the cavitating flow for its complicated two-phase flow features[1-3]. Numerous experimental and numerical researches were conducted and many significant phenomena and mechanisms were revealed[4-6]. The cavitation can be divided into four stages, the incipient stage, the sheet stage, the cloud stage and the super cavitation stage[7]. The nuclei size and the nuclei density were considered by Arndt as the main factors for the cavitation inception[8], and related researches[4]were conducted for understanding the mechanism of the cavitation inception. Violently unsteady and quasiperiodic process is observed due to the sheet/cloud cavitation shedding. The re-entrant jets were claimed to be responsible for the cloud cavitation shedding based on the experimental and numerical investigations[9-11]. More recently, Peng et al.[12]observed the U-type flow structures around the hydrofoils in the cavitation tunnel. It is a common phenomenon in the U-type flow structures with the cloud cavity. All these show the great complexity and difficulties in the cavitation research. So far, there have been no unified explanations and conclusions for the cavitation.

    It is worth mentioning that the numerical simulations have achieved a remarkable progress for the cavitating flow in the last two decades[1]. The Reynolds-averaged Navier-Stokes (RANS) simulations were widely applied in the cavitation flow andpractical applications[13-16]. Numerical methods such as the large eddy simulation (LES)[17-20]are more accurate than the RANS and are widely used nowadays in the cavitating flow simulations. However, little attention has been paid on the verification and validation (V&V) in the cavitating flow simulations with the RANS or LES methods, although it was well understood that the mesh in fluence was a great concern[3,11,16]. The V&V is a basic procedure to evaluate the reliability before accepting the simulated results. In our previous study[18], it was suggested that the V&V is an important and essential part of the CFD. In view of the violently unsteady flow feature and the high noise level, the numerical results may contain a great number of uncertainties and variations in the cavitation simulations. Thus, the V&V of the cavitating flow simulations should be an urgent issue to be investigated and applied in the practice.

    The current quantitative uncertainty estimates for the RANS are mainly built based on the Richardson extrapolation methods. The Grid Convergence Index (GCI) proposed by Roache[21]is used extensively and recommended by American Society of Mechanical Engineers and American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics. The GCI and the variations of the grid convergence index, i.e., the Grid Convergence Index modified by Oberkampf and Roy (GCI-OR)[22], the grid convergence index modified by Logan and Nitta (GCI-LN)[23], and the Grid Convergence Index modified by Roache (GCI-R)[24], see a wide applications in many fields[21-25]. In the Correction Factor Method (CF) developed by Stern et al.[26], a correction factor is used to indicate how far away from the asymptotic range. Wilson et al.[27]expressed the assessments and put forward some modified ideas, and then the modified CF is recommended by the ITTC for the uncertainty analysis in the CFD V&V.

    As pointed out by Xing and Stern[28]and Stern et al.[29], the GCI and the CF have two main drawbacks. The first drawback is that the estimated uncertainty is unreasonably small when the observed order of accuracy is less than the formal order of accuracy. The second drawback is that the confidence levels with few statistical evidence for the GCI and the CF are not well explored. In this context, the Factor of Safety Method (FS) and its modified version (FS1) were proposed by Xing and Stern[28,30]to overcome the two main drawbacks in the CF and the GCI. The FS and FS1 methods show the best conservativeness compared to other methods with large calculations in Xing and Stern’ s studies[28,30].

    All these seven methods were evaluated with large amount of practice[21-28]. Most of these studies focus on the uncertainty estimation with much mitigating flow compared to the unsteady cavitating flow, but the calculation of solution quantities is at a high noise level in unsteady cavitating. Therefore, the appropriateness of all uncertainty estimators applied in the URANS simulations of the cavitating flow remains an issue for more studies and practices.

    The current CFD V&V for the LES was proposed and applied[31-33], but with many unsolved problems even in the simulation of simple flow phenomena such as the channel flow. So far, there is no clear and practical guideline for the V&V of the LES applied in the engineering field. It is a challenging work for the V&V of LES in the future.

    Inspired by the above studies, this paper pays attention to the V&V procedures for the URANS simulations of the turbulent cavitating flow around a Clark-Y hydrofoil. The main focus of this study is to investigate the feasibility of various Richardson extrapolation-based uncertainty estimators in the cavitating flow simulation. It is an attempt to carry on the V&V of URANS simulations of the turbulent cavitating flow, and also a preparation for future in-depth investigations of the LES V&V in the cavitation simulation. The experimental data in published papers[7,16]are chosen to carry on the validation procedure. Simulated cavitation results are discussed with respect to different mesh resolutions.

    1. Numerical methods and uncertainty estimators

    To simulate the unsteady cavitating flow, the standard RNGk-εturbulence model modified by the density corrected model (DCM)[34,35], whose advantages and accuracy in the cavitation simulation were widely validated[34-37], is employed coupled with a mass transfer cavitation model. The main features of the models are as follows.

    1.1 Physical cavitation model

    The Zwart model[38]is used to describe the mass transfer in the ANSYS CFX solver, and it was used and validated widely to accurately capture the feature of the cavitation. The mass transfer equation is as follows

    whereαvis the vapor volume fraction. The source termsandin Eq.(1) are the mass transfer rates for the vaporization and condensation processes, respectively. The Rayleigh-Plesset equation describing the single bubble dynamics is simplified as:

    whereRBis the bubble diameter,pvis the saturated vapor pressure, andpis the local liquid pressure. The rate of change of the bubblemBcan be calculated as

    whereρvis the vapor density andVBis the bubble volume. If there areNBbubbles per unit volume, the volume fractionαvmay be expressed as

    The total interphase mass transfer rate per unit volume is

    This expression is derived by assuming the vaporization. It can be generalized to include the condensation as

    whereFis an empirical constant.Ftakes different values for the condensation and the vaporization in view of the fact that the condensation is usually much slower than the vaporization. The vaporization is initiated at the nucleation sites as usually the non-condensible gases. As the vapor volume fraction increases, the nucleation site density decreases. For the vaporization,αvis replaced byαnuc(1-αv)

    whereαnucis the volume fraction of the nucleation site. The model parameters are set as follows,for the

    vaporization andFcond=0.01 for the condensation.

    1.2 Density corrected model (DCM)

    The standard RNGk-εmodel is based on the renormalization group analysis of the Navier-Stokes equations. To take into account the influence of the compressibility, which has a remarkable effect on the cavitating flow simulation, the standard RNGk-εmodel is modified by the DCM model in this study.

    Coutier-Delgosha et al.[35]proposed a density corrected model (DCM), in which the turbulent eddy viscosityμTis modified as

    where the empirical constantCμis 0.09,kis the turbulent kinetic energy,εis the turbulent eddy dissipation,ρmis the mixture density, which is defined as

    whereρlis the liquid density andαlis the local liquid volume fraction. The functionfDCMis expressed as

    In this study, the constantnis set as 10[36,37].

    1.3 Numerical setup

    The unsteady cavitating flow around a Clark-Y hydrofoil is simulated by the DCM model coupled with a homogeneous cavitation model. The CFX Expression Language in the ANSYS CFX is used to implement the DCM model, and the scalable wall function is adopted.

    The Clark-Y hydrofoil with a chord lengthC=0.07 m is placed horizontally in the computational domain at a fixed angle of attack ofα=8oas shown in Fig.1. The spanwise length is 0.3C. The adopted length and height in the computational domain are shown in Fig.1. The boundary velocity inlet is set asU∞=10 m/s, and the boundary outlet is imposed as a fixed static pressurepout=43079 Pa , which is derived by the cavitation numberσ=0.8No-slip boundary is applied on the hydrofoil surface. The upper and lower walls are arranged as free slip walls. The side wall boundary is arranged as the periodicity interface. An O-H type grid is used to generate the structural mesh for five sets of meshes. Five systematically refined meshes are used with a constant refinement ratioand The mesh 3 is shown in Fig.2. The detailed information about the five meshes is presented in Table 1.

    Fig.2 Structural mesh around the hydrofoil surface for mesh 3

    Table 1 Information about the five meshes

    The time-dependent governing equations are discretized in both space and time domains. With consideration of the computational time and convergence, 20 iterations per time-step with 10-4residual criterion are used to achieve the balance of the accuracy and the efficiency. The uncertainty resulted by the residual criterion can be ignored compared to the grid. The time step is fixed as 10-4s as in Ref.[16] to investigate the influence of the grid. The higher order scheme is adopted for the convection terms with the second order backward Euler algorithm for the time integration. The simulations are carried out initially under the steady non-cavitation condition. Then, the unsteady cavitating flow is modeled with the steady cavitation results as the initial conditions. The convergence process is smooth and the results are displayed as follows.

    1.4 Uncertainty estimators

    The current uncertainty estimators are developed based on the Richardson Extrapolation Method. This paper focuses on the discretization uncertainty estimation with truncated power series expansions. The theoretical discretization errorδREis assumed as

    whereφhdenotes the solution with the grid spacingh,φ0stands for the exact solution of the discrete equations,αfis a constant, andpfis the formal order of accuracy.

    The Richardson Extrapolation Method is derived from Eq.(12). The discretization error is estimated in the fine grid against three grids, i.e., the coarse grid Δx3, the medium grid Δx2, and the fine grid Δx1. Then, the fundamental elements to be used to estimate the uncertainty are as follows.

    The constant grid refinement ratio is computed as

    If the solutions for the coarse grid, the medium grid, and the fine grid areφ3,φ2andφ1,respectively, the change of the solutionεand the observed order of accuracypkcan be defined as:

    The basic estimated error by the formal order of accuracypfor the observed order of accuracypk, as adopted in the seven estimators, can be defined as

    The convergence ratioR[26]is expressed as

    Then, the types of convergence can divide into four categories[39].

    (1) Monotonic convergence: 0<R<1.

    (2) Monotonic divergence: 1<R.

    (3) Oscillatory convergence: -1<R<0.

    (4) Oscillatory divergence:R<-1.

    Based on the Richardson Extrapolation Method,if the solutions are asymptotic, and then the estimated uncertainty is the most accurate. As for the convergence ratioR, the monotonic convergence is required to obtain the uncertainty for the seven estimators (CF, FS, FS1, GCI, GCI-OR, GCI-LN, GCI-R). However, as Phillips and Roy[25]pointed out that it was very difficult and impractical to reach the rigorous conditions in practical applications, where very high noisy level is involved. Thus, all the estimators are modified by adding a minimum value 0.5 for the observed order of accuracy when the convergence is of the oscillatory type. This setup is an acceptable choice when solutions contain a high noise level in practical applications[25]. Obviously, with the monotonic divergence type, one can not determine the estimated uncertainty. Detailed descriptions of the discretization uncertainty estimations by the seven estimators discussed in this paper are as follows:

    (1) Correction factor method (CF)

    The CF developed by Stern et al.[26]and modified by Wilson et al.[27]is defined as

    where

    This correction factor is an indicator to show how far away from the asymptotic range.

    (2) factor of safety method (FS) and its modified version (FS1)

    The FS developed by Xing and Stern[28]is defined as

    The FS1 is the modification proposed by Xing and Stern[30], which is defined as

    (3) GCI and its modified versions (GCI-OR, GCI-LN, GCI-R)

    The GCI developed by Roache[21]is defined as

    The modified version GCI-OR proposed by Oberkampf and Roy[22]is defined as

    where

    The modified version GCI-LN proposed by Logan and Nitta[23]is defined as

    The GCI-R, a modification proposed by Roache[24], is defined as

    where

    Fig.3 Monitoring points at selected chordwise locations along the foil

    Fig.4 Moving average of the lift coefficient and normalized streamwise velocity at selected points along the foil forσ=0.8,α= 8o,

    The CF and the GCI with various variations were widely used[21-27,40], but with two main drawbacks as pointed out by Xing and Stern[28,29]. The FS and the FS1 proposed by Xing and Stern are to overcome the two drawbacks, and they give a better uncertainty estimation in practical applications[25,28,30]. However, as mentioned before, the applicability and the feasibility of all these methods remain an issue to be explored for unsteady cavitating flows. The results of the studies and detailed discussions are as follows.

    2. Results and discussions

    2.1 Statistic convergence analysis

    The monitoring points at the selected chordwise locationsx/c=0.2, 0.4 and 0.6 along the hydrofoil are shown in Fig.3. The points A, B, C, D are arranged as the representatives to investigate the statistic convergence. Figure 4 shows the evolution of the averaged values of different samples for the lift coefficientwhereCis the chord length,Sis the spanwise length) and the normalized streamwise velocityu/U∞at the selected points A, B, C, and D for mesh 1 and mesh 3, whereuis the predicted value at the monitoring location in the computational domain andU∞is the inlet velocity. From the results in Fig.4, at the beginning of the samples, the samples see a great influence on the averaged values, but it is clearly shown that the variations ofCLandu/U∞are relatively small at the end of samples. It can be said that the variation of the averaged value resulted from samples in this study has almost no effect on the estimated uncertainty.

    Fig.5 Distribution of discretization uncertainty at three chordwise locations for seven estimators

    2.2 Discretization uncertainty estimation in unsteady cavitation flow

    The discretization uncertainty UGfor the predicted value of the normalized averaged streamwise velocityu/U∞is obtained for seven estimators. Thepredictedu/U∞data are for the selected chordwise locationsx/c=0.2, 0.4 and 0.6.

    The distribution of the estimated uncertainty at the three chordwise locations for seven estimators is presented in Fig.5. As shown in Fig.5, two locations at the vertical directiony/care selected atx/c=0.2 andx/c=0.4, representing the area near the foil and the area far away from the foil surface, respectively. Three locations at the vertical directiony/care selected atx/c=0.6, representing the area near the foil, the area of cavitation, and the area far away from the foil, respectively.

    From Fig.5, it can be observed that the estimated uncertainty increases with the increase of the distance of the monitoring location from the foil surface for all estimators atx/c=0.2. However, atx/c=0.4, the estimated uncertainty by the FS1 becomes smaller with the increase of the distance of the monitoring location from the foil. This also happens atfor the FS1, the FS and the GCI. At, when the cavitation occurs, the estimated uncertainty for the CF, the GCI-OR, the GCI-LN and the GCI-R are the smallest as compared to other two vertical locations.

    Fig.6 (Color online) Three-dimensional view of streamline and cavitation visualized by iso-surface of vapor volume fractionα=0.1 and vortex structures visualized by iso-surface ofQ-criterion[11],Q=20 000 s-2.σ=0.8,α= 8oand

    For the cavitation flow, especially, for the highly unsteady cloud cavitation in this paper, as shown in Fig.6 and Fig.7, the velocity of the cavitation flow fluctuates violently due to the periodic shedding cavity[6,11,18]. The periodic shedding cavity can make the the solution quantities converge in a high noise level. Therefore, it is shown that the higher uncertainty appears in the area of cavitation and near the foil surface.

    Fig.7 Fluctuation of normalized streamwise velocity at selected monitoring points along the foil.σ=0.8,α=8oandU∞=10 m/s

    Fig.8 (Color online) The area without achieving validation at thelevel, distribution of experimentaland cavitation along the Clark-Y hydrofoil forσ=0.8,α=8oand

    Fig.9 Comparisons of the experimental[16]and predicted normalized averaged streamwise velocities along the Clark-Y hydrofoil forσ=0.8,α=8oandU∞=10 m/s

    In view of these observations, it may be concluded that the FS1, the FS and the GCI show better feasibility and applicability in the unsteady cavitation flow, and the FS1 may be the best choice to evaluate the uncertainty for the numerical simulation of the unsteady cavitating flow. All seven methods are mainly developed for the steady and no cavitation flow, but the unsteady cloud cavitation is a highly fluctuant two-phase flow. So their applications for the unsteady cavitation require more studies and practices in the future.

    2.3 Discussion of the relationship between the cavitation and the uncertainty estimates

    Figure 8 shows the comparison of the area without achieving the validation at theUvlevel and the distribution of the cavitation along the Clark-Y hydrofoil. When, it is said that the validation is achieved at theUvlevel[26]. The estimated uncertaintyUvis computed aswhereUSNis the numerical uncertainty, which is approximately equal to the discretization uncertaintyUGin this paper, andUDis the uncertainty of the experimental data[16]. In view of the high difficulty and uncertainty in measuring the data in the cavitating flow,UDis computed for 5% of the experimental results. Thedata indicated by the cubes in Fig.8(a) are the experimental results[16]for the selected chordwise locationsx/c=0.2, 0.4, 0.6. The area between the dotted line and the foil suction surface in Fig.8(a) is the area without achieving the validation at theUvlevel. The same area can be observed in Fig.8(b) between the dotted line and the foil suction surface. The red area in Fig.8(b) is predicted as the cavitation area, which is chosen as the representative from simulated transient cavitation results. The interface between the red and green areas is the iso-surface of the vapor volume fractionαv=0.1.

    From Fig.8, it can be found that the area without achieving the validation at theUvlevel is located at where the cavitation occurs. The area without achieving the validation at theUvlevel shows a strong relationship with the cavitation, and the cavitation leads to a higher degree of difficulty to achieve the validation at theUvlevel. It is worth noting that the area without achieving the validation at theUvlevel is at the same locations whereUvis much less thanin this study (not shown here). It can be said that the modeling assumptions in this study need to be improved to capture the feature of the cavitation more accurately.

    2.4 Evaluation of mesh resolution and cavitation simulation

    Figure 9 presents the experimental[16]and predicted normalized averaged streamwise velocitiesat the selected monitoring locations along the Clark-Y hydrofoil. As shown in Fig.9, the predicted velocity distributions are in better agreement with the experimental results when the mesh resolution improves. It is a noticeable thing that there is a considerable deviation between simulated and experimental results in the cavitation area even with a fine mesh resolution.

    Fig.10 (Color online) Time evolution of cavitation shedding (experimental results are obtained from Ref.[16]. Simulated cavitation patterns are made by iso-surface of vapor volume fractionαv=0.1,σ=0.8 andU∞=10 m/s )

    Fig.11 (Color online) Predicted vapor volume fraction, vortex stretching, vortex dilatation and baroclinic torque for five meshes.and10 m/s

    Numerical snapshots for five meshes in Fig.10 are given to show the time evolution of the unsteady cavitation. The experimental results are from Ref.[16]. The experimental and numerical results from the left pattern to the right pattern denote that the unsteady cavity develops from the foil leading edge (L.E.), grows to its maximum at the trailing edge (T.E.), and sheds on the foil surface, respectively. From the picture, it can be observed that with the mesh resolution improving from the coarsest to the finest, the cavitation patterns become more complicated, and they are in better agreement with the experimental patterns. Note that the cavitation patterns predicted by the meshes 1, 2 and 3 have clearly demonstrated that the shedding cloud cavity turns from a two-dimensional cavity into a three-dimensional structure, but only two-dimensional cavity flows are observed by the meshes 4, and 5. This reveals that only when the mesh resolution reaches a certain high degree can the predicted cavitation results reflect the effect of the vortex stretching in the unsteady cloud cavitation, which represents the stretching and the tilting of the vortex due to the velocity gradients[11].

    As shown in Fig.6 and Fig.10, the highly unsteady cavitating flow has a strong relationship with the complicated vortex structures. Thus, the vorticity transport equation is used to reveal the interaction between the cavitation and the vortex. It is used to investigate the influence of the mesh resolution on the vortex here. The vorticity transport equation in a variable density flow is employed as follows

    In this equation, the vorticity consists of three terms. The vortex stretching term (ω·?)Vreveals the stretching and the tilting of a vortex due to the velocity gradients, the vortex dilatation termω(?·V) is influenced by the volumetric expansion/contraction,and the baroclinic torquerepresents the generation of the vorticity for misaligned pressure and density gradients. The last term on the right side means the viscous diffusion of the vorticity, and it can usually be neglected in a high Reynolds number flow[11].

    Figure 11 shows the predicted vapor volume fraction, the vortex stretching, the vortex dilatation and the baroclinic torque for five meshes when the unsteady cavity grows to its maximum at the trailing edge. From Fig.11, it can be seen that the mass transfer along the cavity surface has a significant effect on the vortex dilatation and the baroclinic torque. The baroclinic torque is mainly on the liquidvapor interface. This is in accordance with our previous studies[6,11]. When the mesh resolution decreases, the effect of the vortex becomes weaker in the flow field. It is worth noting that the effect of the vortex stretching becomes weaker and weaker, and it almost disappears especially for the mesh 5. This demonstrates again that only when the mesh resolution reaches a certain high degree can the predicted results reflect the effect of the vortex stretching in the unsteady cloud cavitation.

    3. Conclusions

    The unsteady cavitating flow around a Clark-Y hydrofoil is simulated by the DCM model coupled with the Zwart cavitation model and the results are analyzed by uncertainty estimate methods. The main conclusions are as follows:

    (1) The FS1, the FS and the GCI show better feasibility and applicability in the unsteady cavitation flow, and the FS1 may be the best choices for evaluating the uncertainty.

    (2) The area without achieving the validation at theUvlevel shows a strong relationship with the cavitation and the cavitation can lead to a higher degree of difficulty to achieve the validation at thelevel.

    (3) When the mesh resolution improves, the predicted velocity distributions and the cavitation patterns are in better agreement with the experimental results. Moreover, only when the mesh resolution reaches a certain high degree can the predicted cavitation results reflect the effects of the vortex stretching in the unsteady cloud cavitation.

    It is a long way to obtain the experimental, analytical, or numerical benchmark data for the cavitation research due to the difficultly in experimental measurements, the improvement in theory and performing the DNS. Due to the lack of benchmark data in the cavitation simulation, the strict validation process can not be implemented and the true error of the simulated results can not be obtained. The criterion to determine whether one solution verification method is more feasible than the others might need more studies and practices, but the conclusions obtained by the V&V procedure can provide a significant guide for the future cavitation research. The influence of the grid and the time-step should be studied simultaneously as pointed out by Refs.[28] and [41]. However, in investigating the uncertainty estimation methods in the cavitating flow, the grid changes and the time-step is fixed in this paper for overcoming the difficulties to explain the uncertainty resulted by the grid and the time-step simultaneously. It is found that the estimated discretization uncertainty by all estimators is so small that the number of cases whenis very limited, and it is meaningless to use the number of cases whenand the percentages of cases whenfor different ranges ofPvalues proposed by Xing and Stern[28], although it may give a more exact and convincing conclusions. Moreover, the simulated results by parallel computations sometimes may see a considerable difference with the results by a single-core computer. These unresolved issues for the uncertainty estimation of the turbulent cavitating flow are worthy to make a further study in the future.

    It is desirable applying a more accurate simulation method the LES, but there are limited studies focusing on the V&V of LES[31-33]. Xing[33]proposed a general framework for the V&V of LES recently, and Dutta and Xing[42]have put these new methods into practices. These will be the guideline for the future practices about the V&V of LES. The V&V of the LES to be applied in the unsteady cavitation simulation with the guideline of Refs.[33] and [42] will be the focus of our future investigations.

    Acknowledgements

    This work was supported and Science and Technology on Water Jet Propulsion Laboratory (Grant No. 61422230101162223002). The authors would like to thank Prof. Xing Tao from University of Idaho and Prof. Zhou Lian-di and Dr. Zhang Zhi-rong from China Ship Scientific Research Center for providing us many helpful discussions and comments. The authors also appreciate the funding support from the MOE Key Laboratory of Hydrodynamics.

    [1] Luo X. W., Ji B., Tsujimoto Y. A review of cavitation in hydraulic machinery [J].Journal of Hydrodynamics, 2016, 28(3): 335-358.

    [2] Gopalan S., Katz J. Flow structure and modeling issues in the closure region of attached cavitation [J].Physics of Fluids, 2000, 12(4): 895-911.

    [3] Park S., Rhee S. H. Comparative study of incompressible and isothermal compressible flow solvers for cavitating flow dynamics [J].Journal of Mechanical Science and Technology, 2015, 29(8): 3287-3296.

    [4] Kravtsova A. Y., Markovich D. M., Pervunin K. S. et al. High-speed visualization and PIV measurements of cavitating flows around a semi-circular leading-edge flat plate and NACA0015 hydrofoil [J].International Journal of Multiphase Flow, 2014, 60(3): 119-134.

    [5] Pham T. M., Larrarte F., Fruman D. H. Investigation of unsteady sheet cavitation and cloud cavitation mechanisms [J].Journal of Fluids Engineering, 1999, 121(2): 289-296.

    [6] Ji B., Luo X. W., Peng X. X. et al. Three-dimensional large eddy simulation and vorticity analysis of unsteady cavitating flow around a twisted hydrofoil [J].Journal of Hydrodynamics, 2013, 25(4):510-519.

    [7] Wang G., Senocak I., Shyy W. et al. Dynamics of attached turbulent cavitating flows [J].Progress in Aerospace Sciences, 2001, 37(6): 551-581.

    [8] Arndt R. E. A. Cavitation in fluid machinery and hydraulic structures [J].Annual Review of Fluid Mechanics, 1981, 13(1): 273-326.

    [9] Wang Y. W., Wu X. C., Huang C. G. et al. Unsteady characteristics of cloud cavitating flow near the free surface around an axisymmetric projectile [J].International Journal of Multiphase Flow, 2016, 85(8): 48-56.

    [10] Dreyer M., Decaix J., Münch-Alligné C. et al. Mind the gap: a new insight into the tip leakage vortex using stereo-PIV [J].Experiments in Fluids, 2014, 55(11): 1-13.

    [11] Ji B., Luo X. W., Arndt R. E. A. et al. Large eddy simulation and theoretical investigations of the transientcavitating vortical flow structure around a NACA66 hydrofoil [J].International Journal of Multiphase Flow, 2015, 68(1): 121-134.

    [12] Peng X. X., Ji B., Cao Y. et al. Combined experimental observation and numerical simulation of the cloud cavitation with U-type flow structures on hydrofoils [J].International Journal of Multiphase Flow, 2016, 79(2): 10-22.

    [13] Pendar M. R., Roohi E. Investigation of cavitation around 3D hemispherical head-form body and conical cavitators using different turbulence and cavitation models [J].Ocean Engineering, 2016, 112: 287-306.

    [14] Decaix J., Goncalvès E. Investigation of three-dimensional effects on a cavitating Venturi flow [J].International Journal of Heat and Fluid Flow, 2013, 44(4): 576-595.

    [15] Cheng H. Y., Long X. P., Ji B. et al. Numerical investigation of unsteady cavitating turbulent flows around twisted hydrofoil from the Lagrangian viewpoint [J].Journal of Hydrodynamics, 2016, 28(4): 709-712.

    [16] Huang B., Young Y. L., Wang G. et al. Combined experimental and computational investigation of unsteady structure of sheet/cloud cavitation [J].Journal of Fluids Engineering, 2013, 135(7): 071301.

    [17] Yu X. X., Huang C. G., Du T. Z. et al. Study of characteristics of cloud cavity around axisymmetric projectile by large eddy simulation [J].Journal of Fluids Engineering, 2014, 136(5): 051303.

    [18] Ji B., Long Y., Long X. P. et al. Large eddy simulation of turbulent attached cavitating flow with special emphasis on large scale structures of the hydrofoil wake and turbulence-cavitation interactions [J].Journal of Hydrodynamics, 2017, 29(1): 27-39.

    [19] Roohi E., Zahiri A. P., Passandideh-Fard M. Numerical simulation of cavitation around a two-dimensional hydrofoil using VOF method and LES turbulence model [J].Applied Mathematical Modelling, 2013, 37(9): 6469-6488.

    [20] Luo X. W., Ji B., Peng X. X. et al. Numerical simulation of cavity shedding from a three-dimensional twisted hydrofoil and induced pressure fluctuation by large-eddy simulation [J].Journal of Fluids Engineering, 2012, 134(4): 379-389.

    [21] Roache P. J. Verification and validation in computational science and engineering [M]. Albuquerque, NM, USA: Hermosa, 1998.

    [22] Oberkampf W. L., Roy C. J. Verification and validation in scientific computing [M]. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 2010.

    [23] Logan R. W., Nitta C. K. Comparing 10 methods for solution verification, and linking to model validation [J].Journal of Aerospace Computing, Information, and Communication, 2006, 3(7): 354-373.

    [24] Roache P. J. Discussion: “Factors of Safety for Richardson Extrapolation” (Xing, T., and Stern, F., 2010, ASME J. Fluids Eng., 132, p. 061403) [J].Journal of Fluids Engineering, 2011, 133(11): 115501.

    [25] Phillips T. S., Roy C. J. Richardson extrapolation-based discretization uncertainty estimation for computational fluid dynamics [J].Journal of Fluids Engineering, 2014, 136(12): 121401.

    [26] Stern F., Wilson R. V., Coleman H. W. et al. Comprehensive approach to verification and validation of CFD Simulations-Part I: Methodology and procedures [J].Journal of Fluids Engineering, 2001, 123(4): 792.

    [27] Wilson R., Shao J., Stern F. Discussion: criticisms of the“correction factor” verification method 1[J].Journal of Fluids Engineering, 2004, 126(4):704-706.

    [28] Xing T., Stern F. Factors of safety for Richardson extrapolation [J].Journal of Fluids Engineering, 2010, 132(6): 061403.

    [29] Stern F., Yang J., Wang Z. et al. Computational ship hydrodynamics: nowadays and way forward [J].International Shipbuilding Progress, 2013, 60(1-4): 3-105.

    [30] Xing T., Stern F. Closure to “discussion of ‘factors of safety for Richardson Extrapolation’” (2011, ASME J. Fluids Eng., 133, p. 115501) [J].Journal of Fluids Engineering, 2011, 133(11): 115502.

    [31] Klein M. An attempt to assess the quality of large eddy simulations in the context of implicit filtering [J].Flow, Turbulence and Combustion, 2005, 75(1-4): 131-147.

    [32] Freitag M., Klein M. An improved method to assess the quality of large eddy simulations in the context of implicit filtering [J].Journal of Turbulence, 2006, 7: 1-11.

    [33] Xing T. A general framework for verification and validation of large eddy simulations [J].Journal of Hydrodynamics, 2015, 27(2): 163-175.

    [34] Huang B., Wang G., Zhao Y. Numerical simulation unsteady cloud cavitating flow with a filter-based density correction model [J].Journal of Hydrodynamics, 2014, 26(1): 26-36.

    [35] Coutier-Delgosha O., Fortes-Patella R., Reboud J. Evaluation of the turbulence model influence on the numerical simulations of unsteady cavitation [J].Journal of Fluids Engineering, 2003, 125(1): 38-45.

    [36] Ji B., Luo X., Arndt R. E. A. et al. Numerical simulation of three dimensional cavitation shedding dynamics with special emphasis on cavitation-vortex interaction [J].Ocean Engineering, 2014, 87: 64-77.

    [37] Chen G., Wang G., Hu C. et al. Combined experimental and computational investigation of cavitation evolution and excited pressure fluctuation in a convergent-divergent channel [J].International Journal of Multiphase Flow, 2015, 72(5): 133-140.

    [38] Zwart P. J., Gerber A. G., Belamri T. A two-phase flow model for predicting cavitation dynamics[C].Fifth International Conference on Multiphase Flow. Yokohama, Japan. 2004.

    [39] Stern F., Wilson R., Shao J. Quantitative V&V of CFD simulations and certification of CFD codes [J].International Journal for Numerical Methods in Fluids, 2010, 50(11): 1335-1355.

    [40] De Luca F., Mancini S., Miranda S. et al. An Extended verification and validation study of CFD simulations for planing hulls [J].Journal of Ship Research, 2016, 60(2): 101-118.

    [41] E?a L., Hoekstra M. Code verification of unsteady flow solvers with method of manufactured solutions [J].International Journal of Offshore and Polar Engineering, 2008, 18(2): 120-126.

    [42] Dutta R., Xing T. Quantitative solution verification of large eddy simulation of channel flow [C].Proceedings of the 2nd Thermal and Fluid Engineering Conference and 4th International Workshop on Heat Transfer. Las Vegas, USA, 2017.

    (Received March 29, 2017, Revised May 25, 2017)

    * Project supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Project Nos. 51576143, 11472197).

    Biography:Yun Long (1993-), Male, Ph. D. Candidate

    Bin Ji,

    E-mail: jibin@whu.edu.cn.

    猜你喜歡
    龍云新平
    幼兒園里歡樂多
    幼兒園(2021年18期)2021-12-06 02:45:42
    小螞蟻去游玩
    幼兒園(2021年16期)2021-12-06 01:06:48
    老腔唱新歌
    金秋(2021年22期)2021-03-10 07:59:16
    出滇抗戰(zhàn)時期龍云對滇軍的治理研究
    創(chuàng)造(2020年6期)2020-11-20 05:58:42
    讓蘑菇
    幼兒園(2020年3期)2020-03-27 07:00:07
    劉新平 油畫作品
    新疆藝術(2019年3期)2019-07-17 11:26:44
    An integral calculation approach for numerical simulation of cavitating flow around a marine propeller behind the ship hull *
    URANS simulations of the tip-leakage cavitating flow with verification and validation procedures *
    你總是給我力量
    當代音樂(2018年11期)2018-06-30 14:43:16
    Some notes on numerical simulation and error analyses of the attached turbulent cavitating flow by LES *
    看黄色毛片网站| 国产av精品麻豆| 99国产综合亚洲精品| 欧美精品人与动牲交sv欧美| 亚洲精品自拍成人| 久久精品91无色码中文字幕| 国产精品久久视频播放| 欧美日韩视频精品一区| aaaaa片日本免费| av福利片在线| 国产单亲对白刺激| 成人三级做爰电影| 亚洲色图 男人天堂 中文字幕| 国产成人免费观看mmmm| 欧美精品av麻豆av| 可以免费在线观看a视频的电影网站| 两人在一起打扑克的视频| 欧美黄色淫秽网站| 熟女少妇亚洲综合色aaa.| 制服人妻中文乱码| 国产成人精品久久二区二区免费| 国产精品亚洲一级av第二区| videos熟女内射| 国产高清激情床上av| 亚洲伊人色综图| 亚洲国产看品久久| 亚洲三区欧美一区| 女人爽到高潮嗷嗷叫在线视频| 丰满迷人的少妇在线观看| 一级作爱视频免费观看| 两性夫妻黄色片| 亚洲五月婷婷丁香| 18禁裸乳无遮挡免费网站照片 | av天堂久久9| 黑人操中国人逼视频| 亚洲精品久久午夜乱码| 国产亚洲精品一区二区www | 曰老女人黄片| 久热爱精品视频在线9| 动漫黄色视频在线观看| 亚洲精品成人av观看孕妇| 国产成+人综合+亚洲专区| 亚洲色图综合在线观看| 国产深夜福利视频在线观看| 国产日韩欧美亚洲二区| 日韩熟女老妇一区二区性免费视频| 91国产中文字幕| 亚洲avbb在线观看| 免费在线观看视频国产中文字幕亚洲| videos熟女内射| 国产欧美亚洲国产| 国产精品 国内视频| 亚洲精品乱久久久久久| 一本综合久久免费| 老熟女久久久| 国产精品一区二区在线观看99| 精品国产一区二区久久| 久久青草综合色| 亚洲欧美激情在线| 国产xxxxx性猛交| 久久中文字幕一级| 最近最新免费中文字幕在线| 久9热在线精品视频| 国产精品 国内视频| 日本欧美视频一区| 国产野战对白在线观看| 成人av一区二区三区在线看| 欧美成人午夜精品| 色精品久久人妻99蜜桃| av福利片在线| 免费久久久久久久精品成人欧美视频| 成人18禁在线播放| 亚洲精品久久午夜乱码| 欧美性长视频在线观看| av天堂在线播放| 成年人免费黄色播放视频| 国产熟女午夜一区二区三区| 国产在线精品亚洲第一网站| 丰满饥渴人妻一区二区三| 亚洲精品久久成人aⅴ小说| 高清黄色对白视频在线免费看| 色综合欧美亚洲国产小说| 国产亚洲精品一区二区www | 亚洲色图 男人天堂 中文字幕| 久久久久久久久免费视频了| 欧美日韩黄片免| 免费在线观看完整版高清| 久久精品91无色码中文字幕| 国产精品一区二区在线不卡| 久久久久久免费高清国产稀缺| 欧美黑人欧美精品刺激| 制服诱惑二区| 国产成人精品久久二区二区免费| 无遮挡黄片免费观看| 精品免费久久久久久久清纯 | 美女高潮喷水抽搐中文字幕| 精品熟女少妇八av免费久了| 亚洲专区字幕在线| 在线观看一区二区三区激情| 中亚洲国语对白在线视频| 中文字幕最新亚洲高清| 久久久久久免费高清国产稀缺| 日本黄色日本黄色录像| bbb黄色大片| 午夜日韩欧美国产| av中文乱码字幕在线| 老汉色av国产亚洲站长工具| 免费不卡黄色视频| 免费日韩欧美在线观看| 国产又色又爽无遮挡免费看| 丝袜人妻中文字幕| 精品国内亚洲2022精品成人 | 久久性视频一级片| 国产99久久九九免费精品| 亚洲熟女毛片儿| 午夜福利一区二区在线看| 高清毛片免费观看视频网站 | 久久精品亚洲精品国产色婷小说| 国产高清激情床上av| 99riav亚洲国产免费| 国产成人av激情在线播放| 老汉色∧v一级毛片| 久久久久精品人妻al黑| 国产精品秋霞免费鲁丝片| 男男h啪啪无遮挡| 亚洲精品在线观看二区| 天堂中文最新版在线下载| 中文字幕色久视频| 下体分泌物呈黄色| 欧美老熟妇乱子伦牲交| 免费观看a级毛片全部| 亚洲 欧美一区二区三区| 久久精品国产清高在天天线| 国产一区二区激情短视频| 一边摸一边抽搐一进一小说 | 精品国产亚洲在线| 午夜福利视频在线观看免费| 欧美黄色片欧美黄色片| 色精品久久人妻99蜜桃| 国产亚洲欧美98| √禁漫天堂资源中文www| 精品久久久精品久久久| 亚洲成人免费电影在线观看| 成人国产一区最新在线观看| 亚洲国产精品一区二区三区在线| 成人黄色视频免费在线看| 精品久久久久久久久久免费视频 | 激情视频va一区二区三区| 宅男免费午夜| 欧美黄色淫秽网站| 老司机亚洲免费影院| 午夜福利欧美成人| 在线观看免费日韩欧美大片| 久久人妻av系列| 免费日韩欧美在线观看| 多毛熟女@视频| 悠悠久久av| 国产日韩欧美亚洲二区| 久久香蕉国产精品| 日韩有码中文字幕| 一本大道久久a久久精品| 日本五十路高清| 午夜亚洲福利在线播放| 国产亚洲欧美精品永久| 国产精品99久久99久久久不卡| 国产蜜桃级精品一区二区三区 | 亚洲专区国产一区二区| 国产免费av片在线观看野外av| 久久性视频一级片| 9191精品国产免费久久| av在线播放免费不卡| 亚洲国产欧美一区二区综合| 色综合婷婷激情| 国产又爽黄色视频| 麻豆av在线久日| 99精品在免费线老司机午夜| 精品亚洲成国产av| 国产精品久久视频播放| av国产精品久久久久影院| 村上凉子中文字幕在线| 狠狠狠狠99中文字幕| 欧洲精品卡2卡3卡4卡5卡区| 丝袜在线中文字幕| 捣出白浆h1v1| 欧美乱妇无乱码| 亚洲综合色网址| 亚洲精品美女久久久久99蜜臀| 美女高潮喷水抽搐中文字幕| 亚洲人成77777在线视频| 91国产中文字幕| 国精品久久久久久国模美| 99久久人妻综合| 香蕉丝袜av| 老司机福利观看| 麻豆乱淫一区二区| 国产精品九九99| 国产精品亚洲av一区麻豆| 手机成人av网站| 亚洲精品久久成人aⅴ小说| 啪啪无遮挡十八禁网站| 窝窝影院91人妻| 日本欧美视频一区| 欧美人与性动交α欧美精品济南到| 不卡av一区二区三区| 99精品欧美一区二区三区四区| 日韩一卡2卡3卡4卡2021年| 女性被躁到高潮视频| 日本黄色日本黄色录像| av网站在线播放免费| 国产99白浆流出| 精品国产乱码久久久久久男人| 亚洲欧洲精品一区二区精品久久久| 大型黄色视频在线免费观看| 这个男人来自地球电影免费观看| 欧美人与性动交α欧美软件| 19禁男女啪啪无遮挡网站| 高清av免费在线| 久久香蕉精品热| 天天添夜夜摸| 人人妻人人添人人爽欧美一区卜| 日韩 欧美 亚洲 中文字幕| 嫁个100分男人电影在线观看| 夜夜躁狠狠躁天天躁| 亚洲专区中文字幕在线| 久久99一区二区三区| 人人澡人人妻人| 12—13女人毛片做爰片一| 性色av乱码一区二区三区2| 精品第一国产精品| 国产又爽黄色视频| 国产欧美日韩一区二区精品| 色老头精品视频在线观看| 五月开心婷婷网| 久久久久国产一级毛片高清牌| 成人特级黄色片久久久久久久| 免费高清在线观看日韩| 黑人欧美特级aaaaaa片| 国产xxxxx性猛交| 亚洲色图 男人天堂 中文字幕| 咕卡用的链子| 老汉色av国产亚洲站长工具| 国产片内射在线| 男人舔女人的私密视频| 久久中文字幕人妻熟女| 久久人妻av系列| 波多野结衣av一区二区av| 国产精品偷伦视频观看了| 亚洲一区二区三区不卡视频| 久久久水蜜桃国产精品网| 视频区图区小说| 黄片播放在线免费| 成年人黄色毛片网站| 中文字幕最新亚洲高清| 免费在线观看亚洲国产| 99久久99久久久精品蜜桃| 免费黄频网站在线观看国产| 51午夜福利影视在线观看| 很黄的视频免费| 午夜免费鲁丝| 国产亚洲av高清不卡| 国产蜜桃级精品一区二区三区 | 激情视频va一区二区三区| 777久久人妻少妇嫩草av网站| 性少妇av在线| 99国产综合亚洲精品| 国产三级黄色录像| 亚洲一卡2卡3卡4卡5卡精品中文| 校园春色视频在线观看| 侵犯人妻中文字幕一二三四区| 国产精品香港三级国产av潘金莲| 亚洲精品国产精品久久久不卡| 欧美亚洲 丝袜 人妻 在线| 久9热在线精品视频| 亚洲五月婷婷丁香| 精品国产一区二区久久| 国产精品欧美亚洲77777| 久久ye,这里只有精品| 丝袜美足系列| 丝袜在线中文字幕| 国产av一区二区精品久久| 99在线人妻在线中文字幕 | 性少妇av在线| 国产高清国产精品国产三级| 91精品三级在线观看| 露出奶头的视频| 别揉我奶头~嗯~啊~动态视频| 脱女人内裤的视频| 中文字幕制服av| 这个男人来自地球电影免费观看| 美女福利国产在线| 黑人巨大精品欧美一区二区mp4| 中文字幕另类日韩欧美亚洲嫩草| 色尼玛亚洲综合影院| 亚洲成人免费电影在线观看| 中文字幕人妻丝袜制服| 久久久久精品国产欧美久久久| 男人舔女人的私密视频| 一边摸一边抽搐一进一小说 | 欧美激情高清一区二区三区| 女同久久另类99精品国产91| 色播在线永久视频| 国产精品久久久久成人av| 天天影视国产精品| 日本vs欧美在线观看视频| 欧美精品亚洲一区二区| 99国产精品免费福利视频| 欧美丝袜亚洲另类 | 操出白浆在线播放| 亚洲va日本ⅴa欧美va伊人久久| 在线天堂中文资源库| 亚洲成a人片在线一区二区| 欧美 亚洲 国产 日韩一| 日韩欧美一区二区三区在线观看 | 欧美不卡视频在线免费观看 | 欧美在线黄色| 欧美人与性动交α欧美精品济南到| 国产精品乱码一区二三区的特点 | 村上凉子中文字幕在线| 1024视频免费在线观看| a级毛片黄视频| 99re6热这里在线精品视频| 高清在线国产一区| 精品亚洲成国产av| 热99re8久久精品国产| 黄色成人免费大全| 亚洲七黄色美女视频| 精品少妇久久久久久888优播| 纯流量卡能插随身wifi吗| 五月开心婷婷网| 老司机福利观看| 亚洲少妇的诱惑av| 国产精品偷伦视频观看了| 一本综合久久免费| 老司机影院毛片| 最近最新中文字幕大全电影3 | a级片在线免费高清观看视频| 亚洲人成伊人成综合网2020| 亚洲国产欧美日韩在线播放| av网站免费在线观看视频| 9色porny在线观看| 国精品久久久久久国模美| 熟女少妇亚洲综合色aaa.| 亚洲午夜理论影院| 日韩成人在线观看一区二区三区| 黄色视频不卡| 久9热在线精品视频| 9191精品国产免费久久| 热re99久久精品国产66热6| 日本精品一区二区三区蜜桃| 免费观看a级毛片全部| 亚洲情色 制服丝袜| 精品国产超薄肉色丝袜足j| 高清视频免费观看一区二区| 久久性视频一级片| 中文字幕最新亚洲高清| 在线十欧美十亚洲十日本专区| 精品亚洲成国产av| 男女免费视频国产| 免费在线观看黄色视频的| xxx96com| 在线观看www视频免费| 1024香蕉在线观看| 视频在线观看一区二区三区| 久久国产精品人妻蜜桃| 在线十欧美十亚洲十日本专区| 九色亚洲精品在线播放| 12—13女人毛片做爰片一| 国产午夜精品久久久久久| 国产精品偷伦视频观看了| 国产一区二区激情短视频| 后天国语完整版免费观看| 黄色a级毛片大全视频| 亚洲精品中文字幕在线视频| 国产精品免费一区二区三区在线 | 久久人妻福利社区极品人妻图片| 美女扒开内裤让男人捅视频| 成年人午夜在线观看视频| 自拍欧美九色日韩亚洲蝌蚪91| 久久人妻av系列| 欧美日韩亚洲高清精品| 女性生殖器流出的白浆| 中国美女看黄片| 一级毛片精品| 一区二区三区激情视频| 精品人妻熟女毛片av久久网站| 99riav亚洲国产免费| 嫁个100分男人电影在线观看| 亚洲少妇的诱惑av| 午夜福利在线免费观看网站| 久久精品熟女亚洲av麻豆精品| 国产男女超爽视频在线观看| 亚洲人成电影观看| 国产精品久久久av美女十八| 久久天堂一区二区三区四区| 午夜亚洲福利在线播放| 久久久国产成人精品二区 | 国产av精品麻豆| 人妻久久中文字幕网| 中文字幕制服av| 色精品久久人妻99蜜桃| 一级毛片精品| 人人妻人人澡人人爽人人夜夜| av片东京热男人的天堂| 成人永久免费在线观看视频| 大型av网站在线播放| 久久精品国产99精品国产亚洲性色 | 国产xxxxx性猛交| 免费在线观看黄色视频的| 久久久久久久久免费视频了| 国产区一区二久久| 人人妻人人爽人人添夜夜欢视频| av网站免费在线观看视频| 一边摸一边抽搐一进一小说 | 欧美最黄视频在线播放免费 | 精品人妻在线不人妻| 国产精品亚洲一级av第二区| 99re在线观看精品视频| 国产午夜精品久久久久久| 99热只有精品国产| 最近最新中文字幕大全免费视频| 精品久久蜜臀av无| 国产欧美日韩一区二区三区在线| 国产xxxxx性猛交| 国产精品自产拍在线观看55亚洲 | 三上悠亚av全集在线观看| a在线观看视频网站| 在线观看www视频免费| 久久久久久久久久久久大奶| 亚洲欧美激情在线| 91av网站免费观看| 变态另类成人亚洲欧美熟女 | 狠狠狠狠99中文字幕| 亚洲午夜精品一区,二区,三区| 国产av一区二区精品久久| 国产男女内射视频| 国产男靠女视频免费网站| 日本wwww免费看| 国产99白浆流出| 另类亚洲欧美激情| 精品一区二区三区av网在线观看| 精品人妻在线不人妻| 一个人免费在线观看的高清视频| 老汉色av国产亚洲站长工具| 亚洲成av片中文字幕在线观看| 欧美精品人与动牲交sv欧美| 国产成人精品久久二区二区免费| 在线观看免费视频网站a站| 久久人妻福利社区极品人妻图片| 久久午夜综合久久蜜桃| 女性被躁到高潮视频| 久久精品国产亚洲av香蕉五月 | 9191精品国产免费久久| 精品一区二区三卡| 国产色视频综合| 曰老女人黄片| 日本精品一区二区三区蜜桃| 成人国语在线视频| 亚洲伊人色综图| 在线观看免费午夜福利视频| 午夜视频精品福利| 69精品国产乱码久久久| 国产在线一区二区三区精| 18禁裸乳无遮挡免费网站照片 | 无遮挡黄片免费观看| 青草久久国产| 好男人电影高清在线观看| 久久精品成人免费网站| 亚洲国产欧美日韩在线播放| tocl精华| 涩涩av久久男人的天堂| 老鸭窝网址在线观看| 国产亚洲一区二区精品| 久久天躁狠狠躁夜夜2o2o| 久热爱精品视频在线9| 天天添夜夜摸| 黄色成人免费大全| 一区在线观看完整版| 麻豆成人av在线观看| 国产熟女午夜一区二区三区| 亚洲色图av天堂| 91国产中文字幕| 久久久久久免费高清国产稀缺| 高清欧美精品videossex| 久热这里只有精品99| 成年人黄色毛片网站| 成人精品一区二区免费| 久久国产精品男人的天堂亚洲| 久久九九热精品免费| 国产成+人综合+亚洲专区| 欧美黄色片欧美黄色片| 国产成人精品久久二区二区91| 脱女人内裤的视频| 人妻 亚洲 视频| 高清黄色对白视频在线免费看| svipshipincom国产片| 国产99白浆流出| 亚洲中文av在线| 9色porny在线观看| 宅男免费午夜| 婷婷丁香在线五月| 无限看片的www在线观看| www.999成人在线观看| 亚洲综合色网址| 美女午夜性视频免费| 亚洲一卡2卡3卡4卡5卡精品中文| 国内久久婷婷六月综合欲色啪| 国产成人免费无遮挡视频| 精品视频人人做人人爽| 一边摸一边抽搐一进一小说 | 日日摸夜夜添夜夜添小说| 19禁男女啪啪无遮挡网站| 国产成人免费无遮挡视频| 99在线人妻在线中文字幕 | 国产乱人伦免费视频| 一级,二级,三级黄色视频| 老司机在亚洲福利影院| 久久香蕉激情| 国产精品综合久久久久久久免费 | 少妇被粗大的猛进出69影院| 精品少妇久久久久久888优播| 亚洲男人天堂网一区| 99久久99久久久精品蜜桃| 亚洲av电影在线进入| 午夜福利影视在线免费观看| 夜夜爽天天搞| 亚洲欧美精品综合一区二区三区| 亚洲五月婷婷丁香| 老汉色∧v一级毛片| 女人被狂操c到高潮| 日韩 欧美 亚洲 中文字幕| 精品一区二区三区av网在线观看| 国产深夜福利视频在线观看| 国产男女内射视频| 国产午夜精品久久久久久| 王馨瑶露胸无遮挡在线观看| 国产精品久久视频播放| 国产精品亚洲一级av第二区| 国产av又大| 在线av久久热| 女人被躁到高潮嗷嗷叫费观| 18在线观看网站| 757午夜福利合集在线观看| 午夜视频精品福利| 99精品欧美一区二区三区四区| 波多野结衣一区麻豆| 757午夜福利合集在线观看| 一夜夜www| 黄片播放在线免费| 高清视频免费观看一区二区| 中文字幕精品免费在线观看视频| 久久久久久久午夜电影 | 成熟少妇高潮喷水视频| 亚洲av成人av| 亚洲av片天天在线观看| 免费看十八禁软件| 国产精品98久久久久久宅男小说| 丝袜人妻中文字幕| 韩国av一区二区三区四区| 麻豆成人av在线观看| 侵犯人妻中文字幕一二三四区| 一本一本久久a久久精品综合妖精| 亚洲第一欧美日韩一区二区三区| 国产精品99久久99久久久不卡| 俄罗斯特黄特色一大片| a级毛片黄视频| 天堂中文最新版在线下载| 下体分泌物呈黄色| 欧美激情高清一区二区三区| 亚洲情色 制服丝袜| 99在线人妻在线中文字幕 | x7x7x7水蜜桃| 国产在线观看jvid| 国产成人av教育| 亚洲伊人色综图| 免费在线观看黄色视频的| 久久久精品区二区三区| 久久香蕉激情| 午夜两性在线视频| 99香蕉大伊视频| 又紧又爽又黄一区二区| 久久精品人人爽人人爽视色| 成人精品一区二区免费| 日韩 欧美 亚洲 中文字幕| 久久久国产精品麻豆| 亚洲在线自拍视频| 国产又爽黄色视频| 久久久久国产一级毛片高清牌| 日韩欧美国产一区二区入口| 日本一区二区免费在线视频| xxxhd国产人妻xxx| 欧美老熟妇乱子伦牲交| 亚洲成人手机| 极品教师在线免费播放| 激情在线观看视频在线高清 | 久久精品成人免费网站| 午夜日韩欧美国产| 国产有黄有色有爽视频| 欧美 亚洲 国产 日韩一| 别揉我奶头~嗯~啊~动态视频| 国产又色又爽无遮挡免费看| 亚洲一区高清亚洲精品| 捣出白浆h1v1| 久久青草综合色| 视频在线观看一区二区三区| 亚洲国产欧美日韩在线播放| 久久久久国产一级毛片高清牌| 日韩熟女老妇一区二区性免费视频| 久久精品亚洲熟妇少妇任你| 操出白浆在线播放| 国产精品影院久久| 国产精品一区二区免费欧美| 亚洲av熟女| 热re99久久精品国产66热6| 亚洲综合色网址| 色94色欧美一区二区|