Guochun WU(吳國春)

Fujian Province University Key Laboratory of Computational Science,School of Mathematical Sciences,Huaqiao University,Quanzhou 362021,China

E-mail:guochunwu@126.com

Xin ZHONG(鐘新)?

School of Mathematics and Statistics,Southwest University,Chongqing 400715,China

E-mail:xzhong1014@amss.ac.cn

Abstract We prove the global existence and exponential decay of strong solutions to the three-dimensional nonhomogeneous asymmetric fluid equations with nonnegative density provided that the initial total energy is suitably small.Note that although the system degenerates near vacuum,there is no need to require compatibility conditions for the initial data via time-weighted techniques.

Key words nonhomogeneous asymmetric fluid equations;global strong solution;exponential decay;vacuum

1 Introduction

Asymmetric fluid equations,which were suggested and introduced by Eringen in the 1960s(see[18]),are a signi ficant step towards the generalization of the Navier-Stokes equations.They pertain to fluids which exhibit micro-rotational effects and micro-rotational inertia,and can be viewed as non-Newtonian.Physically,asymmetric fluid may represent fluids that consist of rigid,randomly oriented(or spherical particles)suspended in a viscous medium,where the deformation of fluid particles is ignored.It can describe many phenomena that appear in a number of complex fluids,such as suspensions,animal blood,and liquid crystals that cannot be characterized appropriately by the Navier-Stokes system,and as such they are important to scientists working on hydrodynamic-fluid problems.We refer the interested reader to the monograph[26],which provides a detailed derivation of the micropolar fluid equations from the general constitutive laws,together with an extensive review of the mathematical theory and applications of this particular model.

Let ??R3be a bounded smooth domain,we are concerned with the following threedimensional nonhomogeneous asymmetric fluid equations(see[26,pp.22–23]):

Here ρ,u,w,and P denote the density,velocity,micro-rotational velocity,and pressure of the fluid,respectively.The positive constantsμ1,ξ,μ2,and λ are the viscosity coefficients of the fluid.

We consider an initial boundary value problem for(1.1)with the initial condition

and the Dirichlet boundary condition

It should be noted that when there is no micro-structure(w=0 and ξ=0),the system(1.1)reverts to the classical nonhomogeneous Navier-Stokes equations,which have been studied by many researchers;please refer to[1,2,13–15,17,23,24,27–29]and references therein.

Let us turn our attention to the system(1.1).When the initial density is strictly away from vacuum(i.e.,ρ0is strictly positive),the authors[4]proved some existence and uniqueness results for strong solutions.Meanwhile,Braz e Silva et al.[5]investigated the global existence and uniqueness of solutions for the 3D Cauchy problem through a Lagrangian approach.On the other hand,when the initial density allows vacuum states,ukaszewicz[25](see also[26,Chapter 3])obtained the short-time existence of weak solutions provided that the initial functions u0and w0are inand the initial density ρ0is uniformly bounded and satis fieswhile Braz e Silva and Santos[12]established the global existence of weak solutions.In[9],under smallness assumptions on the initial data,weak solutions with improved regularity were obtained.At the same time,imposing a compatibility condition on the initial data,Zhang and Zhu[33]showed global existence of the unique strong solution with nonnegative density in R3under a smallness condition.Later on,Ye[32]improved their result by removing the compatibility condition and,furthermore,obtained the exponential decay of strong solutions.There are also other interesting studies on aspects of the nonhomogeneous asymmetric fluid equations,such as the vanishing viscosity problem[6,10],error estimates for the spectral semi-Galerkin approximations[16],the local existence of semi-strong solutions[7],and strong solutions in thin domains[8].In this paper,our purpose is to study the global existence and uniqueness of strong solutions of(1.1)–(1.3),and to describe the large time behavior of such strong solutions.The initial density is allowed to vanish.

Before stating our main result,we first explain the notations and conventions used throughout this paper.We write

For 1≤p≤∞and integer k≥0,the standard Sobolev spaces are denoted by

Our main results read as follows:

Theorem 1.1For constant q∈(3,6],assume that the initial data(ρ0≥0,u0,w0)satis fies

Let(ρ,u,w)be a strong solution to the problem(1.1)–(1.3).If T?<∞is the maximal time of existence for that solution,then we have

where r and s satisfy

Remark 1.2The local existence of a unique strong solution with initial data as in Theorem 1.1 was established in[31].Hence,the maximal time T?is well-de fined.

Remark 1.3It should be noted that(1.5)is independent of the micro-rotational velocity.The result indicates that the nature of the blowup for nonhomogeneous asymmetric fluid models is similar to the nonhomogeneous Navier-Stokes equations(see[22]),and does not depend on further sophistication of the equation(1.1)3.

We will prove Theorem 1.1 by contradiction in Section 3.In fact,the proof of the theorem is based on a priori estimates under the assumption that‖u‖Ls(0,T;Lr)is bounded independently of any T∈(0,T?).The a priori estimates are then sufficient for us to apply the local existence result repeatedly to extend a local solution beyond the maximal time of existence T?;this contradicts the maximality of T?.

Based on Theorem 1.1,we can establish the global existence of strong solutions to(1.1)–(1.3)under some smallness condition.

Theorem 1.4Let the conditions of Theorem 1.1 be in force.Then there exists a small positive constant ε0depending only on‖ρ0‖L∞,?,μ1,ξ,μ2,and λ such that,if

then the problem(1.1)–(1.3)has a unique global strong solution(ρ≥0,u,w)such that,for τ>0 and 2≤r

Remark 1.6When there is no micro-structure(ξ=0 andw=0),Theorem 1.4 generalizes the previous result[15]for the 3D nonhomogeneous Navier-Stokes equations,which need some compatibility condition on the initial data andto be small.Furthermore,we get exponential decay rates of the solution rather than algebraic decay.

The rest of this paper is organized as follows:in Section 2,we collect some elementary facts and inequalities that will be used later.Section 3 is devoted to the proof of Theorem 1.1.Finally,we give the proof of Theorem 1.4 in Section 4.

2 Preliminary

In this section,we will recall some known facts and elementary inequalities which will be used frequently later.

We start with the Gagliardo-Nirenberg inequality(see[20,Theorem 10.1,p.27]).

Lemma 2.1(Gagliardo-Nirenberg)Let ??R3be a bounded smooth domain.Assume that 1≤q,r≤∞and j,m are arbitrary integers satisfying 0≤j

The constant C depends only on m,j,q,r,a,and ?.In particular,we have

which will be used frequently in the next section.

Next,we give some regularity properties(see[3,Proposition 4.3])for the following Stokes system:

Lemma 2.2Suppose thatF∈Lr(?)with 1

3 Proof of Theorem 1.1

Let(ρ,u,w)be a strong solution as described in Theorem 1.1.Suppose that(1.5)were false;that is,there exists a constant M0>0 such that

Lemma 3.1It holds that

Proof1.The desired(3.2)follows from(1.1)1and divu=0(see[24,Theorem 2.1]).Moreover,from(1.1)1and ρ0≥0,we have ρ(x,t)≥0.

2.Multiplying(1.1)2byu,(1.1)3byw,and integrating by parts,we obtain that

Integrating(3.5)over[0,T]leads to(3.3).

3.From(3.2)and the Poincar′e inequality(see[30,(A.3),p.266])

with d being the diameter of ?,we arrive at

Hence,we get

Similarly,we have

which,together with Gronwall’s inequality,leads to(3.4),and completes the proof of Lemma 3.1.

Lemma 3.2Under the condition(3.1),there exists a positive constant C depending only on M0,?,μ1,μ2,ξ,λ,and the initial data such that,for i∈{0,1,2},

Proof1.Multiplying(1.1)2byutand integrating by parts yields

Multiplying(1.1)3bywtand integrating by parts leads to

which,combined with(3.10),leads to

Integrating(3.22)over[0,T],together with(3.1),(3.3),and(3.12),leads to(3.9)with i=0.For i∈{1,2},we can obtain similar results.

Lemma 3.3Under the condition(3.1),there exists a positive constant C depending only on M0,?,μ1,μ2,ξ,λ,and the initial data such that,for i∈{1,2},

Multiplying(3.24)byut,(3.25)bywt,and integrating the resulting equality by parts over ?and summing it,we obtain that

Consequently,we derive(3.23)from(3.31),Gronwall’s inequality,(3.9),(3.32),and(3.4).

Lemma 3.4Under the condition(3.1),there exists a positive constant C depending only on M0,?,μ1,μ2,ξ,λ,and the initial data such that

Proof1.We obtain from Lemma 2.2,Sobolev’s inequality,the Gagliardo-Nirenberg inequality,(3.2),(3.19),(3.21),(3.9),and Young’s inequality that,for σ being as in Lemma 3.1,

This,combined with Sobolev’s embedding theorem,(3.9),(3.1),(3.3),and(3.4),implies that

2.By H¨older’s inequality,Sobolev’s inequality,and(3.2),we have

which,together with H¨older’s inequality,implies for any 0≤a

As a consequence,if T≤1,we obtain from(3.35),H¨older’s inequality,and(3.23)that

If T>1,one deduces from(3.36),(3.35),H¨older’s inequality,and(3.23)that

Hence,we infer from(3.36)and(3.37)that

This combined with(3.34)leads to(3.33).

Lemma 3.5Let q be as in Theorem 1.1.Then there exists a positive constant C depending only on M0,?,μ1,μ2,ξ,λ,q,and the initial data such that,for r∈[2,q),

ProofTaking the spatial derivative?on the transport equation(1.1)1together with(1.1)4leads to

Thus,standard energy methods yield for any q∈(2,∞)that

which combined with Gronwall’s inequality and(3.33)gives that

Notice that we have

This,together with(3.39)and(3.9),yields

Thus,(3.38)follows from(3.2),(3.39),and(3.40).

Lemma 3.6Let q be as in Theorem 1.1,there exists a positive constant C depending only on M0,?,μ1,μ2,ξ,λ,q,and the initial data such that

Proof1.We obtain from(3.18),(3.2),Sobolev’s inequality,and(3.9)that

which together with(3.23)and(3.9)yields that

From(3.20),(3.2),Sobolev’s inequality,and(3.9),one has

which combined with(3.23)and(3.9)yields

2.We get from(3.17),(3.2),(3.39),Sobolev’s inequality,(3.42),and(3.44)that

which,together with(3.9),(3.4),(3.23),and(3.43),implies that

Similarly,one can deduce that

Hence,(3.41)follows from(3.43)and(3.45)–(3.47).

With Lemmas 3.1–3.6 in hand,we are now in a position to prove Theorem 1.1.

Proof of Theorem 1.1We argue by contradiction.Suppose that(1.5)were false;that is,that(3.1)holds.Note that the general constant C in Lemmas 3.1–3.6 is independent of t

satis fies the initial condition(1.4)at t=T?.Therefore,taking(ρ,u,w)(x,T?)as the initial data,one can extend the local strong solution beyond T?,which contradicts the maximality of T?.Thus we finish the proof of Theorem 1.1.

4 Proof of Theorem 1.4

Throughout this section,we denote that

Note that Lemma 3.1 also holds true,due to its independence from the condition(3.1).

Lemma 4.1Let(ρ,u,w)be a strong solution to the system(1.1)–(1.3)on(0,T).Then there exist positive constants C and L depending only on‖ρ0‖L∞,?,μ1,μ2,λ,and ξ such that,for any t∈(0,T),

whereμ?μ1+μ2+λ+2ξ+8ξd2.

Proof1.We obtain from(3.11)and the Cauchy-Schwarz inequality that

which yields that

which combined with(4.8)implies(4.1)and finishes the proof of the lemma.

Lemma 4.2Let(ρ,u,w)be a strong solution to the system(1.1)–(1.3)on(0,T)and letμbe as in Lemma 4.1.Then there exists a positive constant ε0depending only on‖ρ0‖L∞,?,μ1,μ2,λ,and ξ such that

where L is the same as in(4.1).In view of the regularities ofuandw,one can obtain that both E(t)and Φ(t)are continuous functions on(0,T).By(4.1),there is a positive constant M depending only on‖ρ0‖L∞,?,μ1,μ2,λ,and ξ such that

Otherwise,by the continuity and monotonicity of Φ(t),there is a T0∈(0,T]such that

On account of(4.13),it follows from(4.12)that

Recalling the de finitions of E(t)and Φ(t),we deduce from the above inequality that

By virtue of the claim we showed in the above,we derive from(4.12)that

provided that(4.11)holds true.This implies(4.10)and consequently completes the proof of Lemma 4.2.

Lemma 4.3Let(4.11)be in force and let σ be as in Theorem 1.4.Then for ζ(T)?min{1,T},there exists a positive constant C depending only on ?,μ1,ξ,μ2,λ,q,and the initial data such that

Proof1.We obtain from Lemma 4.2 that

Choosing s=4 and r=6 in(3.22),together with Sobolev’s inequality and(4.15),yields that

Then we deduce from(4.16)multiplied by eσt,Gronwall’s inequality,(3.12),and(3.4)that

2.Choosing s=4 and r=6 in(3.30),together with Sobolev’s inequality and(4.15),leads to

Multiplying(4.18)by eσtgives rise to

which,combined with Gronwall’s inequality,(4.17),and(3.4),implies that for ζ(T)?min{1,T},

3.Choosing s=4 and r=6 in(3.19)and(3.21),together with Sobolev’s inequality and(4.15),yields that

This along with(4.19)and(4.17)indicates that

Hence,(4.14)follows from(4.19)and(4.20).

Now,we can give the proof of Theorem 1.4.

Proof of Theorem 1.4Let ε0be the constant stated in Lemma 4.2,and suppose that the initial data(ρ0,u0,w0)satis fies(1.4)and

According to[31],there is a unique local strong solution(ρ,u,w)to the system(1.1)–(1.3).Let T?be the maximal existence time to the solution.We will show that T?=∞.Suppose,by contradiction,that T?<∞.Then,by(1.5),we deduce that for(s,r)=(4,6),

which combined with the Sobolev inequality‖u‖L6≤C‖?u‖L2leads to

By Lemma 4.2,for any 0

which implies that

which is in contradiction to(4.21).This contradiction provides us with the fact that T?=∞,and thus we obtain the global strong solution.Moreover,the exponential decay rate(1.9)follows from(4.14).This finishes the proof of Theorem 1.4.