• <tr id="yyy80"></tr>
  • <sup id="yyy80"></sup>
  • <tfoot id="yyy80"><noscript id="yyy80"></noscript></tfoot>
  • 99热精品在线国产_美女午夜性视频免费_国产精品国产高清国产av_av欧美777_自拍偷自拍亚洲精品老妇_亚洲熟女精品中文字幕_www日本黄色视频网_国产精品野战在线观看 ?

    Visuospatial properties of caudal area 7b in Macaca fascicularis

    2013-09-20 03:39:30HuiHuiJIANGYingZhouHUJianHongWANGYuanYeMAXinTianHU
    Zoological Research 2013年2期

    Hui-Hui JIANG, Ying-Zhou HU, , Jian-Hong WANG, Yuan-Ye MA, , Xin-Tian HU,

    1. State Key Laboratory of Brain and Cognitive Sciences, Kunming Institute of Zoology, the Chinese Academy of Sciences, Kunming, Yunnan 650223, China;

    2. University of the Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China;

    3. State Key Laboratory of Brain and Cognitive Sciences, Institute of Biophysics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100101, China;

    4. Kunming Primate Research Center, Kunming Institute of Zoology, the Chinese Academy of Sciences, Kunming 650223, China

    When we attempt to grasp or reach for an object,our motor system requires that our sensory system provide information about the location of the target.However, different sensory stimuli are encoded in different reference frames: visual stimuli are captured by the retina, auditory stimuli are received within the head,and tactile stimuli arise from the body. Movement must be directed towards the target depending on where it is positioned with respect to the body part. To proceed from sensation to movement, our brain needs to integrate information from the different senses and transform it into a non-retinocentric frame of reference, such as a body-part-centered frame of reference. The purpose of this study was to investigate whether area caudal 7b was a part of this transformation system.

    To construct a body-part-centered visual receptive field, retinal signals must be integrated with other signals.For example, by combining retinocentric visual signals with eye position signals, the head-centered visual receptive field of the cells can be constructed (Graziano et al, 1997). The arm-centered visual receptive field of cells requires integration of not only retinocentric visual and eye position signals but also head and arm position signals. In addition to visual signals, eye position, head position, and vestibular signals converge on neurons in area 7a (Andersen et al, 1985; Andersen et al, 1990b;Andersen et al, 1997). These signals are combined in a systematic fashion using the “gain field” mechanism, in which other signals modify the retinocentric visual signal.1

    Anatomically, area 7a projects to area 7b and the ventral intraparietal cortex (VIP), which in turn connects to the ventral premotor cortex (PMv). Although other sensory signals modulate retinocentric visual signals, the visual receptive fields in area 7a are still eye-centered(Andersen et al, 1985). In the PMv, most neurons are bimodal cells, i.e., they respond to both tactile and visual stimuli (Fogassi et al, 1992; Fogassi et al, 1996;Gentilucci et al, 1983; Graziano et al, 1994; Graziano et al, 1997). Most visual receptive fields encode nearby space in a body-part-centered reference frame (Fogassi et al, 1992; Fogassi et al, 1996; Gentilucci et al, 1983;Graziano et al, 1994; Graziano et al, 1997). Additionally,most neurons in the VIP are bimodal (Colby et al, 1993;Duhamel et al, 1998) and employ a hybrid reference frame (Duhamel et al, 1997).

    On the basis of previous studies, it is known that area 7b receives visual and somatosensory inputs from cortical and subcortical brain structures (Andersen et al,1990a; Cavada & Goldman-Rakic, 1989a) and is also the target of cerebellar output, which suggests that it may be important in movement (Clower et al, 2001; Clower et al,2005). Damage to area 7b causes spatial deficits, such as neglect of contralateral peripersonal space (Matelli et al,1984), which suggests that this area is involved in spatial information processing. Area 7b contains cells with visual and tactile properties that resemble those of PMv cells (Dong et al, 1994; Leinonen et al, 1979). These results suggest that area 7b may be one component of the receptive field transformation system. Do neurons in this area have the characteristics of the transformation system?Does the area employ a retinocentric reference frame similar to area 7a, a hybrid system similar to VIP, or some other reference frame? To date, no quantitative studies on these issues have been conducted.

    In the present study, we first qualitatively tested the sensory properties of neurons in the caudal portion of area 7b. If a neuron showed a clear visual response, the reference frame of the neuron was tested quantitatively.We plotted the visual receptive fields of neurons when the eyes were held still. The receptive fields were then replotted when the eyes were in a new position. In this way, we could determine whether the visual receptive fields were centered on the eyes.

    MATERIALS AND METHODS

    Ethics statement

    All animal care and surgical procedures were performed in accordance with the National Institutes of Health Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals and approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee at the Kunming Institute of Zoology.

    Two adult male Macaca fascicularis (4.2–6.0 kg)were used in the present research. They were singlehoused under standard conditions (a 12-h light/dark cycle with lights on from 07:00 to 19:00, humidity at 60%, and temperature at 21 ± 2℃ in the animal colony. Their body weights were closely monitored during the experiments.

    Surgical procedures

    All surgeries were performed under strict aseptic conditions and, unless otherwise indicated, under ketamine hydrochloride (10 mg/kg) and acepromazine (0.4 mg/kg)anesthesia. Under deep anesthesia, one stainless steel recording chamber for chronic single-unit recording, 2.5 cm in diameter, was embedded in dental acrylic over the right parietal lobe of each monkey. A steel bolt for holding the monkeys’ head stationary during experiments was also embedded in the acrylic. During the same surgery session, one scleral search coil (Fuchs & Robinson, 1966)was implanted to record eye position signals.

    Post-surgical recovery lasted approximately one week. Both monkeys were given two additional weeks before behavioral training started to allow the skull to grow tightly around the skull screws.

    After the behavioral training was completed, the recording chamber was opened under aseptic conditions and a ~4 mm hole was drilled through the dental acrylic and bone to expose the dura mater. All data were collected from this region.

    Behavioral training

    Before experimental task training began, each monkey’s ad libitum daily water intake was measured.Based on this measurement, the monkeys were placed on a restricted water schedule whereby each monkey received most of its water as a reward for performing the task. If the monkey received less water than its normal daily amount during the experimental session, a postsession supplement was given. Each monkey also received ad libitum water for two consecutive days every weekend during which training and recording sessions were not conducted. Each monkey’s body weight was closely monitored during the time it was on the restricted water schedule.

    At the beginning of the task training, the monkey sat in the chair with its head and left arm fixed, and its eye movements were constantly monitored using a standard eye coil technique (Fuchs & Robinson, 1966;Graziano et al, 1997). As shown in Figure 1, three LEDs were placed 57 cm in front of the monkey at eye level,15 visual degrees apart. First, the monkeys were trained to perform the fixation task without a peripheral visual stimulus. The central LED was set to blink at a frequency of 6 Hz. If the monkey fixated on the central LED within a specified round spatial window (fixation window), the LED stopped blinking and remained lit. If the monkey maintained fixation for the remainder of the trial, the LED was turned off and the monkey received a drop of juice as a reward. A 3–10-second intertrial interval (ITI)commenced at the same time that the reward was given.If the monkey broke fixation at any time during the trial,the LED was turned off, the ITI was restarted, and the monkey was not rewarded. As the training progressed,the size of the spatial fixation window was decreased and the fixation period was increased. At the final stage, the monkeys were able to fixate within a round window of 3 visual degrees in diameter for a 4-second fixation period.After they learned to fixate on the central LED, the monkeys were trained to fixate on the two lateral LEDs using the same procedure.

    Having learned the fixation task, the monkeys were next trained to perform the same task when a peripheral visual stimulus was presented (Figure 1 and Figure 2).

    Recording procedure

    The recording sessions started after the monkey was able to perform the task for more than 700 trials in one day. During the daily recording sessions, a hydraulic microdriver was mounted to the top of the recording chamber. A steel guide cannula (22-gauge syringe needle)was slowly lowered through the small hole in the chamber until its tip was close to the surface of the dura mater. Then, a varnish-coated tungsten microelectrode(Frederick Haer, impedance 0.8–1.0 MΩ) was advanced slowly from the guide cannula through the dura mater and into the cortex. After the electrode penetrated the surface of the cortex, as indicated by the appearance of background neuronal signals, the electrode was withdrawn 1.5 mm, and the brain was allowed to recover from the indentation caused by the advance of the electrode for about one hour. The electrode was then slowly moved up and down to isolate single-unit activity.As the experiment progressed, the cannula and a new electrode were inserted into a slightly different location in the small hole.

    Tests

    When a single neuron was isolated, its activity was constantly monitored with an oscilloscope and a loudspeaker. Each neuron was first tested to determine if it had tactile, visual, and/or auditory responses. The tactile response was tested by manual palpation, gentle pressure, and stroking with a cotton swab. Tactile responses on the face were studied in the dark or when the eyes were covered. Visual responses were studied with hand-held objects, such as cotton swabs, a bunch of plastic grapes, monkey dolls, or a metal rod. The visual stimulus was moved into the visual receptive field from above, below, or the side. The receptive field was measured with the most effective stimulus when the response became stable and clear. By presenting stimuli at different distances from the monkey, we also tested the depth extension of visual RFs.

    If a cell showed clear visual responses, it was then tested quantitatively with one of the following two tests:

    Figure 1 Two experimental tests were used in the present study. A: robot arm test. In each trial, the monkey fixated on one of the three LEDs (FIX A, B, C), and the visual stimulus was advanced along one of the five trajectories indicated by the arrows. B: plastic rod test. In each trial, the animal fixated on one of the three LEDs (A, B, C). During the fixation, one of the five plastic rods indicated by the filled circles (stimulus positions 3 to 7) descended into view from behind a panel. The circles on the monkey’s head show the recording locations.

    Figure 2 Time course of the two experimental tests used in the present study. The change in the vertical position of the stimulus time course indicates stimulus movement.The dotted line indicates that the duration was random. FIX = fixation light; STIM = stimulus.

    Robot arm test

    Only monkey 1 was tested with this type of stimulus,as shown in Figure 1A. At 0.5 seconds after the onset of fixation, a visual stimulus (a piece of blue Styrofoam, 2 cm in diameter) was advanced towards the animal by a mechanized track at a speed of 8 cm/sec along one of five equally spaced parallel trajectories at the same level,15 visual degrees apart. The trajectories were 12 cm long and their locations were adjusted to match the visual receptive field being studied. The stimulus stayed at the end of the trajectory for 0.2 seconds before the ITI started. The stimulus was moved to the starting position of the next trajectory during the ITI. The time course of this test is demonstrated in Figure 2. The combination of three eye fixation positions and five stimulus trajectories resulted in fifteen conditions. These fifteen conditions were tested in an interleaved fashion, and each condition typically had ten trials.

    However, there were some problems with the stimulus. Firstly, in the robot arm test, the Styrofoam stimulus was always in view and some area 7b neurons quickly habituated to it. Secondly, the five trajectories used in the robot arm test were parallel to each other and moved straight towards the monkey. When the stimulus was advanced towards the monkey along a trajectory located peripheral to the visual receptive field, it produced a much larger visual angle compared with other trajectories in the middle of the visual receptive field before reaching its end point. When a larger visual angle was covered, a larger area on the retina was stimulated,which made it more difficult to directly compare results from different trajectories. To address these problems, we designed a plastic rod test in which the stimulus suddenly came into view and the visual angle of visual stimulus was kept constant.

    Plastic rod test

    This test was used on both monkeys. An array of five small plastic rods, arranged 15 degrees apart along a semicircle and controlled by five different stepping motors, served as visual stimuli. The center of the semicircle was located at the midline of the monkey’s face, and its radius was 5 cm. There were a total of ten possible locations on the semicircle (labeled 1 to 10) for the five rods so that the locations of the stimuli could be adjusted according to the location of the visual receptive field being tested.

    Each trial began when the animal fixated on one of the three LEDs. After an initial fixation period of 1.25–2.0 seconds for monkey 1 and 2.0–2.5 seconds for monkey 2, one of the five rods descended at a speed of 10 cm/sec for 6.0 cm, emerging from behind a head-level panel into the monkey’s view. The rod remained stationary for 1.0 second in front of the animal. The trial was then ended and the animal received 0.2 ml of juice as a reward. A variable ITI began (4.0-7.0 seconds for monkey 1 and 2.0–3.0 seconds for monkey 2), and the rod was withdrawn to behind the panel. Figure 2 shows the time course for the test. The combination of three eye fixation positions and five stimuli (rods) yielded fifteen conditions. These fifteen conditions were run in an interleaved fashion, and each condition typically contained ten trials.

    Statistical procedures

    Two analysis windows were chosen for each cell.The first, termed the "baseline window" and used to calculate the pre-stimulus baseline activity, consisted of the time period from 0.6 to 0.0 s before the onset of the stimulus. The other window, termed the "response window", was used to examine the neuron’s response to visual stimuli and consisted of the time period from the onset of the neuron’s main visual response (i.e., three standard deviations above the baseline for three consecutive bins, with a 50-ms bin length) to 1.5 s after stimulus onset because all recorded neurons continued their responses to the end of the trial. We chose not to use a fixed response window as in previous studies because the size and location of the receptive fields differed among the neurons, and as a result, the exact time when the stimulus moved into the receptive field varied from neuron to neuron. Because cells did not respond to the stimulus at the same time across different locations, we chose the response window from the earliest onset(which was usually also the best response) location and applied this window to all fifteen experimental conditions. The response window was shortened and lengthened for several tested neurons; very similar results were obtained, which demonstrated the robustness of this method of analysis.

    Qualitative analysis

    All neurons were classified qualitatively. Firstly,neurons without a clear peak (as judged by the existence of a response location in the curve that was significantly different from the response for at least one location on both sides of the peak, according to a t-test) in three tuning curves were not included in the data set for the spatial shift analysis. Secondly, before calculating the shift index, we compared the shapes of the tuning curves by moving two of the tuning curves until the peaks of three tuning curves overlapped, because shift index values can be affected by shapes of the tuning curves. We classified neurons into the following three types based on this comparison: (1) Neurons without obvious shape changes (as judged by the overlap of the standard deviations at each stimulus location) and receptive fields that did not shift with the eyes were classified as nonretinocentric neurons. (2) Neurons without obvious shape changes and receptive fields that shifted with the eyes were defined as retinocentric neurons. (3) Neurons with a partial spatial shift, which included two groups of neurons: the first group had no obvious shape changes but had partially shifted receptive fields; the second group had obvious shape changes and was also classified as partial spatial shift neurons.

    Quantitative analysis

    Based on the qualitative analysis, neurons with clear peaked responses were analyzed quantitatively. A shift index (SI) was calculated to measure how much the visual receptive field shifted when eye position changed as the monkey fixated on different LEDs (Graziano,1999; Schlack et al, 2005).

    First, a center of mass (CM) was calculated for each of the tuning curves corresponding to the right (CMR)and left (CML) fixation LEDs. When the animal fixated on the right LED, the responses (number of spikes per second) from each of the five stimulus locations were numbered from the monkey’s left to right as R1 to R5.The formula used to calculate the CMR of the right fixation LED tuning curve is C MR = ( R1 + 2 × R 2+3 × R 3 + 4 × R 4 + 5 × R 5 )/(R1 + R 2 + R 3 + R 4 + R 5).

    The CML of the left LED could be calculated in the same way. From the CMs, the shift index (SI) was calculated as SI = C MR - C ML .

    A positive SI indicated that the visual receptive field shifted in the same direction as the change in eye position in the orbit. A negative SI indicated that the visual receptive field was displaced in the opposite direction from the change in eye position. An SI value close to zero indicated a stationary visual receptive field.

    Histology

    After the series of experiments was completed,monkey 1 was injected with an overdose of pentobarbital sodium (100 mg/kg) and perfused with saline and 4%paraformaldehyde. The head was removed from the body and placed in a stereotactic apparatus. The skull and dura mater were removed to expose the brain. The intraparietal, superior temporal and lateral sulci were mapped stereotactically. Figure 3 shows the entry location of the electrode in relation to the sulci for monkey 1. On this basis, we confirmed that the recording sites were located in the caudal portion of area 7b.

    Figure 3 Locations of area 7b and electrode penetration. Black dot: the recording area was ~4 mm in diameter and~2 mm in depth. IPL, the inferior parietal lobe; SPL,the superior parietal lobe; ips, the intraparietal sulcus.

    RESULTS

    Response categories

    In total, 291 neurons in caudal area 7b were examined in the right hemispheres of two awake monkeys. In these cells, neuronal responses were classified as somatosensory, visual, or bimodal(somatosensory + visual). We also tested 82 cells in this area using auditory stimuli and found that only one (1%)responded. Table 1 shows the proportions of the different response types.

    Table 1 Categories of neurons based on their response type

    Somatosensory cells

    To classify the tactile receptive fields, we arbitrarily divided the monkey body into four parts: head, arms(including the hands), trunk, and legs (including the feet).The tactile receptive fields were classified into three types according to the number of body parts encompassed by the receptive fields. The tactile receptive fields were also classified into three types:ipsilateral, contralateral, and bilateral according to the recording hemisphere. The distribution of the receptive fields of the somatosensory cells is shown in Table 2.

    Table 2 The distribution of tactile receptive fields

    Visual cells

    In total 35 of the 42 purely visual cells were recorded for a time to test the location of the visual receptive fields, whereas the remaining seven cells were only studied long enough to determine that they had visual responses. The visual receptive fields were divided in two ways. According to recording hemisphere, the visual receptive fields could be divided into three categories: ipsilateral, contralateral, and bilateral to the recording hemisphere. By presenting stimuli at different distances from the monkey, neurons were classified into two types: distance > 1 m and distance < 1m. Only five visual neurons were tested with stimuli at different distances. Table 3 shows the results.

    Table 3 The distribution of visual receptive fields

    Bimodal cell

    We assessed the locations of the tactile and visual receptive fields for 119 of the 122 bimodal cells. The remaining three cells were only recorded long enough to demonstrate the existence of visual and tactile responses.The tactile receptive and visual receptive fields of the bimodal cells were classified into different types in the same way as the somatosensory and visual cells, and the results are shown in Tables 2 and 3, respectively.

    One interesting finding is that the visual receptive field in bimodal neurons always surrounds the tactile receptive field. Overall, 76% (90/119) of the bimodal cells had tactile receptive fields that spatially match their visual receptive fields.

    We also tested the visual response to perceptual depth in 45 out of the 119 bimodal cells. More than half(64%) of these cells responded clearly to the stimuli presented more than 1 m away from the monkey’s face,and the remaining 36% of the visual receptive fields were confined to a depth of 1 m or less, with a mean inner-limit distance of 0.4 m.

    In summary, the qualitative tests showed that there were three major types of responsive neurons in caudal area 7b: visual neurons (14%), somatosensory neurons(15%), and bimodal neurons (42%). The receptive fields of these three categories of neurons were usually large:52% (85/163) of all tactile receptive fields (including the somatosensory cells and bimodal cells) encompassed two or more parts of the body surface, 61% (100/163) of all tactile receptive fields were bilateral, and 66% (101/154)of the visual receptive fields (including the visual cells and bimodal cells) were bilateral. Most visual receptive fields extended more than 1 m away from the body part.Most of the bimodal cells had spatially matched tactile and visual receptive fields.

    Reference frames for encoding visual stimuli

    If a neuron showed a clear visual response, it was further studied to determine whether the receptive field moved with the eye. As described in the methods section,two types of stimuli were used and three different types of neurons were found.

    For some neurons, such as Neuron JC89 (Figure 4 and Figure 5) tested with the plastic rod stimulus, the visual receptive fields moved with the eye. As seen in the Figures, when the monkey shifted its fixation point from the right to the middle LED and then to the left LED, the position at which neuron JC89 had the best response shifted from position 3 to position 2 and then to position 1. These results suggest that the visual receptive field moves with the eyes.

    Some neurons had visual receptive fields that did not shift with eye movement. Neuron HB16 (Figure 6 and Figure 7), which was tested with the robot arm stimulus, belonged to this type of neuron. Figure 7 shows that regardless of the LED on which the monkey was fixating, the position with the best response did not change for this neuron; it always showed the strongest response to a stimulus presented at position 4, and the three tuning curves were similar and overlapping. These results demonstrate that the visual receptive fields do not move with the eyes.

    Figure 4 Histograms of activity from neuron JC89 in area 7b. The upper row of the histograms shows the visual responses to the stimuli presented at the five stimulus positions when the monkey was fixating on the left LED (marked as L). The middle row of the histograms shows the visual responses when the monkey was fixating on the center LED (marked as M). The lower row of the histograms shows the visual responses when the monkey was fixating on the right LED (marked as R).For each histogram, the x-axis shows the time in ms, and the y-axis shows the neuronal responses in spikes/second. The vertical line inside each histogram indicates the time at which the visual stimulus began to move into view. The horizontal line inside histogram L1 indicates the temporal window used to calculate the neuronal response to the stimulus.

    Figure 5 Three tuning curves for the activity of neuron JC89. The x-axis shows the stimulus position, and the y-axis shows the neuronal responses in spikes/second. The dashed line shows the average pre-stimulus activity.During right fixation (circles), the cell responded most strongly to the stimulus presented at position 3.During middle fixation (filled diamonds), the cell responded most strongly to the stimulus presented at position 2. During left fixation (stars), the cell responded most strongly to the stimulus presented at position 1. This result indicates that the receptive field of this cell shifted with changes in eye position.

    Neuron HB86 (Figure 8, Figure 9), which was tested with the plastic rod stimulus, is an example of a neuron with properties intermediate to those of a visual receptive field, which did not move with the eyes, and those of a visual receptive field, which did. That is, these neurons had visual receptive fields that moved slightly.As seen from the three tuning curves of neuron HB86 in Figure 9, when the monkey’s eyes shifted from the right LED to the middle LED, the two tuning curves overlapped, i.e., the visual receptive field did not shift with the eyes. In contrast, when the eye moved from the middle LED to the left LED, the visual receptive field partially shifted to the left as indicated by increased responses to stimuli at positions 1 and 2.

    To quantify the results, a shift index (SI) was calculated for each neuron to measure how much the visual receptive field shifted when the eye position changed because the monkey was fixating on different LEDs. An example SI calculation for neuron JC89 is as follows:Thus, the shift index of JC89 is SI(J C 8 9)= C MRCML= 3 .0 - 2 .2 = 0 .8.

    Figure 6 Histograms of the activity of neuron HB16. Axes are the same as in Figure 4. The horizontal line inside histogram L4 indicates the temporal window used to calculate the neuronal responses to the stimulus.

    Figure 7 Three tuning curves for the activity of neuron HB16.Axes are the same as in Figure 5. During right LED fixation (circles), middle LED fixation (filled diamonds), and left LED fixation (stars) the cell responded most strongly to the stimulus presented at position 4. This result indicates that the receptive field of neuron HB 16 did not shift with changes in eye position.

    Using the same formula, the shift indices for the other two example neurons are as follows: neuron HB16= 0.1 and neuron HB86 = 0.3.

    Overall, 34 neurons showing clear responses to the automatically presented stimuli demonstrated peak responses. We calculated the shift index for each of the 34 neurons. Figure 10 shows the distribution of the shift indices was from –0.4 to 0.8. The distribution of the shift index was significantly greater than zero (χ2= 9.23, P <0.01). On average, the visual receptive fields moved when the eyes moved. Thus, some neurons had visual receptive fields that moved with eye movement, some neurons had partially moving visual receptive fields, and some had receptive fields that did not move with the eyes.

    Effect of eye position on the neuronal firing rate

    In addition to the location of the visual receptive field, the visual response magnitude of caudal area 7b neurons was sometimes significantly influenced by the position of the eyes in the orbit, which is termed the modulation effect. For example, regardless of the LED on which the monkey fixated, HB169 responded with almost equal strength at each of the five positions,although its response was slightly stronger when the stimulus was at position 5 (Figure 11). However, the response magnitude of the cell decreased monotonically

    Figure 8 Histograms of the activity of neuron HB86. Axes are the same as in Figure 4. The horizontal line inside histogram L2 indicates the temporal window used to calculate the neuronal response to the stimulus.

    Figure 9 Three tuning curves for the activity of neuron HB86.Axes are the same as in Figure 5. During right LED fixation (circles) and middle LED fixation (filled diamonds), the two corresponding tuning curves overlapped. The cell showed the weakest response to the stimulus presented at position 1 and the strongest response to the stimulus at position 5. In contrast,when the eyes moved from the middle LED to the left LED (stars), the visual receptive field partially shifted to the left as indicated by the increased responses to stimuli at positions 1 and 2. Overall, the visual receptive field of neuron HB 86 partially shifted with changes in eye position.

    Figure 10 Distribution of shift indices for 34 neurons. The distribution of shift indices was significantly above zero (P< 0.01)

    as the eye moved from the right LED to the middle LED and from the middle LED to the left LED. A 5 × 3 within-subjects two-way ANOVA (5 stimulus positions ×3 eye positions) showed that the modulation of the cell response was significant (P < 0.001). Neuron JC 89 showed the same type of response modulation (P < 0.05).

    In contrast, neuron HB16 responses were not modulated by eye position (P > 0.5). This cell responded best to the stimulus presented at position 4. The magnitude of the visual response did not change significantly when the eyes were at different positions in the orbit.

    Figure 11 Three tuning curves for the activity of neuronHB169. Axes are the same as in Figure 5. Regardless of the LED on which the monkey fixated, neuron HB169 responded to the stimulus with almost equal strength when presented at each of the five positions, although the response was slightly stronger at position 5. However, the response magnitude decreased monotonically as the eyes moved from the right LED(circles) to the middle LED (filled diamonds) and from the middle LED to the left LED (stars). This result indicates that the visual response magnitude of neuron HB169 was significantly modulated by changes in eye position (P < 0.001).

    The ANOVA for the 34 neurons showed that the visual response magnitudes of 12 cells (35%) were significantly modulated by eye position, and the response magnitudes of the remaining 22 cells (65%) were not significantly modulated by eye position.

    DISCUSSION

    Visual and tactile responses in caudal area 7b

    In this study, we qualitatively tested the sensory properties of neurons in caudal area 7b. Three major types of responsive neurons were found: visual neurons(14%), somatosensory neurons (15%), and bimodal neurons (42%). The bimodal, visual-somatosensory cells usually responded to visual stimuli positioned close to the tactile receptive field. Some cells responded only to stimuli within centimeters of the body whereas others responded to stimuli presented more than 1 m away.

    Other studies regarding the general properties of neurons in area 7b have also demonstrated that it contains visual cells, somatosensory cells, and bimodal cells (Dong et al, 1994; Leinonen et al, 1979). The proportions of cells across these three categories varied from study to study, with that the percentage of bimodal neurons varying from 6% to 33%. The present study showed 42% bimodal neurons.

    One possible reason for these quantitative differences is that the stimuli and the way in which stimuli are used may vary across labs. For example, we found that the visual response to a stimulus delivered from behind the animal and then moved into its view was usually better than the visual response observed when the same stimulus was delivered from in front of the animal.It is possible that the stimulus coming from behind was unexpected, and therefore, it drew more attention. Other labs using stimuli presented from the front may therefore report a lower percentage of visual responses. Another possible reason for the quantitative differences is that the recording sites (i.e., the sample population) may differ from the caudal part of area 7b used in the present study.Furthermore, the monkeys used in our study were awake,whereas other studies were conducted on anesthetized monkeys. As described previously, the wakefulness of animals can affect the response properties of area 7b neurons (Robinson & Burton, 1980). When the monkey is asleep, the receptive fields of some somatosensory neurons become smaller, the borders become more difficult to define, and the somatic activations become less clear.

    Transformation of reference frames

    It has been suggested that body-part-centered receptive fields provide a general solution to the central problem of sensory-motor integration (Graziano et al,1994) and that this type of reference frame can encode the distance and direction from a body part to a nearby visual stimulus (Graziano et al, 1997). However, to proceed from a retinocentric reference frame to a bodypart-centered reference frame requires a complicated transformation system that involves several brain areas.

    Only one study has reported that, in some cases, the visual responses of neurons in area 7b do not depend on the direction of the gaze (Leinonen et al, 1979). Our present research is the first quantitative study to explore whether the visual receptive fields of neurons in caudal area 7b move with the eyes. We found that neurons in caudal area 7b encoded space in a hybrid reference frame,and some neurons encoded space in a retinocentric reference frame. We did not further differentiate the reference frames employed by the non-retinocentric neurons, e.g., head-centered, body-centered, or worldcentered, but showed that the caudal part of area 7b was one component of the reference frame transformation system.

    Recent studies on the inferior parietal lobe (IPL)challenge the widely used bipartite subdivision of the IPL convexity into caudal and rostral areas (7a and 7b,respectively). These studies provide strong support for a subdivision of the IPL convexity into four distinct areas(Opt, PG, PFG, and PF) and indicate that these four areas are not only cytoarchitectonically distinct but also distinct in connectivity (Gregoriou et al, 2006; Rozzi et al, 2006). In our study, the recording site was located in the caudal portion of area 7b, corresponding to area PFG.The present results provide evidence that caudal area 7b may be one component of the reference frame transformation, which is consistent with the proposed function based on the connectivity pattern of area PFG(Borra et al, 2008; Fogassi & Luppino, 2005; Rozzi et al,2006).

    Eye-position-independent visual receptive fields in other brain areas

    The anterior intraparietal (AIP) area is located rostrally in the lateral bank of the intraparietal sulcus and is known to play a crucial role in visuomotor transformations for grasping. Anatomically, the AIP is connected to the IPL and the rostral ventral premotor area F5 (Borra et al, 2008; Luppino et al, 1999).Reversible lesion experiments have shown that AIP inactivation produces grasping impairment (Gallese et al,1994). Visual, motor, and visuomotor neurons have been recorded during the execution of grasping movements(Murata et al, 1996; Murata et al, 2000; Sakata et al,1995; Taira et al, 1990).

    Another parietal area suggested to have eyeposition-independent visual receptive field is the parietooccipital visual area (V6A). Studies have shown that although most of the visual receptive fields are eyecentered, there is a small portion of neurons in this area with visual receptive fields that remain static when the eyes move and another small group of visual receptive fields that partially move with the eyes (Fattori et al,1992; Galletti et al, 1993; Galletti et al, 1995).

    Area 7b, VIP, and PMv are monosynaptically interconnected and all project to the putamen (Cavada &Goldman-Rakic, 1989a; Cavada & Goldman-Rakic,1989b; Cavada & Goldman-Rakic, 1991; Matelli et al,1986). Studies of the putamen of anesthetized and awake macaque monkeys have shown that about 30% of the cells with tactile responses also respond to visual stimuli.For these bimodal neurons, the visual receptive fields are anchored to the tactile receptive fields, moving as the tactile receptive fields move (Graziano & Gross, 1993).

    Comparing these brain areas quantitatively by calculating the fraction of each cell type in each individual area, might provide more information about how the system works, and more experiments should be conducted in which all of these areas are tested using identical procedures.

    In summary, we tested the response properties and the spatial encoding coordinates of neurons in caudal area 7b. Three major kinds of responsive neurons were found in this area: visual neurons, somatosensory neurons, and bimodal neurons. The receptive fields were usually large, and visual receptive fields of the bimodal neurons were always located near tactile receptive fields.Neurons in this area encoded space in a hybrid reference frame, which may be a characteristic of the reference frame transformation system. In addition, the responses of some neurons were modulated by the eye position.

    Andersen RA, Essick GK, Siegel RM. 1985. Encoding of spatial location by posterior parietal neurons. Science, 230(4724): 456-458.

    Andersen RA, Asanuma C, Essick G, Siegel RM. 1990a. Corticocortical connections of anatomically and physiologically defined subdivisions within the inferior parietal lobule. J Comp Neurol, 296(1): 65-113.

    Andersen RA, Bracewell RM, Barash S, Gnadt JW, Fogassi L. 1990b.Eye position effects on visual, memory, and saccade-related activity in areas LIP and 7a of macaque. J Neurosci, 10(4): 1176-1196.

    Andersen RA, Snyder LH, Bradley DC, Xing J. 1997. Multimodal representation of space in the posterior parietal cortex and its use in planning movements. Annu Rev Neurosci, 20(1): 303-330.

    Borra E, Belmalih A, Calzavara R, Gerbella M, Murata A, Rozzi S,Luppino G. 2008. Cortical connections of the macaque anterior intraparietal (AIP) area. Cereb Cortex, 18(5): 1094-1111.

    Cavada C, Goldman-Rakic PS. 1989a. Posterior parietal cortex in rhesus monkey: II. Evidence for segregated corticocortical networks linking sensory and limbic areas with the frontal lobe. J Comp Neurol,287(4): 422-425.

    Cavada C, Goldman-Rakic PS. 1989b. Posterior parietal cortex in rhesus monkey: I. Parcellation of areas based on distinctive limbic and sensory corticocortical connections. J Comp Neurol, 287(4): 393-421.Cavada C, Goldman-Rakic PS. 1991. Topographic segregation of corticostriatal projections from posterior parietal subdivisions in the macaque monkey. Neuroscience, 42(3): 683-696.

    Clower DM, West RA, Lynch JC, Strick PL. 2001. The inferior parietal lobule is the target of output from the superior colliculus, hippocampus,and cerebellum. J Neurosci, 21(16): 6283-6291.

    Clower DM, Dum RP, Strick PL. 2005. Basal ganglia and cerebellar inputs to 'AIP'. Cereb Cortex, 15(7): 913-920.

    Colby CL, Duhamel JR, Goldberg ME. 1993. Ventral intraparietal area of the macaque: anatomic location and visual response properties. J Neurophysiol, 69(3): 902-914.

    Dong WK, Chudler EH, Sugiyama K, Roberts VJ, Hayashi T. 1994.Somatosensory, multisensory, and task-related neurons in cortical area 7b (PF) of unanesthetized monkeys. J Neurophysiol, 72(2): 542-564.

    Duhamel JR, Bremmer F, BenHamed S, Graf W. 1997. Spatial invariance of visual receptive fields in parietal cortex neurons. Nature,389(6653): 845-848.

    Duhamel JR, Colby CL, Goldberg ME. 1998. Ventral intraparietal area of the macaque: congruent visual and somatic response properties. J Neurophysiol, 79(1): 126-136.

    Fattori P, Galletti C, Battaglini PP. 1992. Parietal neurons encoding visual space in a head-frame of reference. Boll Soc Ital Biol Sper,68(11): 663-670.

    Fogassi L, Gallese V, di Pellegrino G, Fadiga L, Gentilucci M, Luppino G, Matelli M, Pedotti A, Rizzolatti G. 1992. Space coding by premotor cortex. Exp Brain Res, 89(3): 686-690.

    Fogassi L, Gallese V, Fadiga L, Luppino G, Matelli M, Rizzolatti G.1996. Coding of peripersonal space in inferior premotor cortex (area F4) . J Neurophysiol, 76(1): 141-157.

    Fogassi L, Luppino G. 2005. Motor functions of the parietal lobe[J].Curr Opin Neurobiol, 15(6): 626-631.

    Fuchs AF, Robinson DA. 1966. A method for measuring horizontal and vertical eye movement chronically in the monkey. J Appl Physiol, 21(3):1068-1070.

    Gallese V, Murata A, Kaseda M, Niki N, Sakata H. 1994. Deficit of hand preshaping after muscimol injection in monkey parietal cortex.Neuroreport, 5(12): 1525-1529.

    Galletti C, Battaglini PP, Fattori P. 1993. Parietal neurons encoding spatial locations in craniotopic coordinates. Exp Brain Res, 96(2): 221-229.

    Galletti C, Battaglini PP, Fattori P. 1995. Eye position influence on the parieto-occipital area PO (V6) of the macaque monkey. Eur J Neurosci,7(12): 2486-2501.

    Gentilucci M, Scandolara C, Pigarev IN, Rizzolatti G. 1983. Visual responses in the postarcuate cortex (area 6) of the monkey that are independent of eye position. Exp Brain Res, 50(2-3): 464-468.

    Graziano MS, Gross CG. 1993. A bimodal map of space:somatosensory receptive fields in the macaque putamen with corresponding visual receptive fields. Exp Brain Res, 97(1): 96-109.

    Graziano MS, Yap GS, Gross CG. 1994. Coding of visual space by premotor neurons. Science, 266(5187): 1054-1057.

    Graziano MS, Hu XT, Gross CG. 1997. Visuospatial properties of ventral premotor cortex. J Neurophysiol, 77(5): 2268-2292.

    Graziano MS. 1999. Where is my arm? The relative role of vision and proprioception in the neuronal representation of limb position. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A, 96(18): 10418-10421.

    Gregoriou GG, Borra E, Matelli M, Luppino G. 2006. Architectonic organization of the inferior parietal convexity of the macaque monkey.J Comp Neurol, 496(3): 422-451.

    Leinonen L, Hyv?rinen J, Nyman G, Linnankoski I. 1979. I. Functional properties of neurons in lateral part of associative area 7 in awake monkeys. Exp Brain Res, 34(2): 299-320.

    Luppino G, Murata A, Govoni P, Matelli M. 1999. Largely segregated parietofrontal connections linking rostral intraparietal cortex (areas AIP and VIP) and the ventral premotor cortex (areas F5 and F4). Exp Brain Res, 128(1-2): 181-187.

    Matelli M, Gallese V, Rizzolatti G. 1984. Neurological deficit following a lesion in the parietal area 7b in the monkey. Boll Soc Ital Biol Sper,60(4): 839-844.

    Matelli M, Camarda R, Glickstein M, Rizzolatti G. 1986. Afferent and efferent projections of the inferior area 6 in the macaque monkey. J Comp Neurol, 251(3): 281-298.

    Murata A, Gallese V, Kaseda M, Sakata H. 1996. Parietal neurons related to memory-guided hand manipulation. J Neurophysiol, 75(5):2180-2186.

    Murata A, Gallese V, Luppino G, Kaseda M, Sakata H. 2000.Selectivity for the shape, size, and orientation of objects for grasping in neurons of monkey parietal area AIP. J Neurophysiol, 83(5): 2580-2601.Robinson CJ, Burton H. 1980. Organization of somatosensory receptive fields in cortical areas 7b, retroinsula, postauditory and granular insula of M. fascicularis. J Comp Neurol, 192(1): 69-92.

    Rozzi S, Calzavara R, Belmalih A, Borra E, Gregoriou GG, Matelli M,Luppino G. 2006. Cortical connections of the inferior parietal cortical convexity of the macaque monkey. Cereb Cortex, 16(10): 1389-1417.

    Sakata H, Taira M, Murata A, Mine S. 1995. Neural mechanisms of visual guidance of hand action in the parietal cortex of the monkey.Cereb Cortex, 5(5): 429-438.

    Schlack A, Sterbing-D'Angelo SJ, Hartung K, Hoffmann KP, Bremmer F. 2005. Multisensory space representations in the macaque ventral intraparietal area. J Neurosci, 25(18): 4616-4625.

    Taira M, Mine S, Georgopoulos AP, Murata A, Sakata H. 1990. Parietal cortex neurons of the monkey related to the visual guidance of hand movement. Exp Brain Res, 83: 29-36.

    老司机影院成人| 侵犯人妻中文字幕一二三四区| 国产片特级美女逼逼视频| 欧美精品亚洲一区二区| 麻豆精品久久久久久蜜桃| 如何舔出高潮| 日韩中文字幕欧美一区二区 | 狠狠精品人妻久久久久久综合| 国产爽快片一区二区三区| 国产日韩欧美亚洲二区| 久久人人97超碰香蕉20202| tube8黄色片| 国产精品国产av在线观看| 亚洲国产日韩一区二区| 在线精品无人区一区二区三| 日本免费在线观看一区| 91午夜精品亚洲一区二区三区| 波多野结衣一区麻豆| 日韩三级伦理在线观看| 啦啦啦在线免费观看视频4| 夜夜骑夜夜射夜夜干| av国产久精品久网站免费入址| 一本大道久久a久久精品| 欧美人与性动交α欧美软件| 韩国av在线不卡| 亚洲精品中文字幕在线视频| 久久狼人影院| 少妇被粗大的猛进出69影院| 亚洲成人av在线免费| 老鸭窝网址在线观看| 大香蕉久久成人网| 欧美精品国产亚洲| 亚洲欧美成人综合另类久久久| 纵有疾风起免费观看全集完整版| 天天躁狠狠躁夜夜躁狠狠躁| 久久 成人 亚洲| 国产精品成人在线| 国产福利在线免费观看视频| 日本黄色日本黄色录像| 夫妻性生交免费视频一级片| 欧美日韩成人在线一区二区| 又粗又硬又长又爽又黄的视频| 我的亚洲天堂| 91精品伊人久久大香线蕉| 亚洲欧美清纯卡通| 亚洲国产欧美网| 国产在视频线精品| 一本久久精品| 国产精品久久久久久久久免| 欧美日韩精品网址| 黄网站色视频无遮挡免费观看| 国产无遮挡羞羞视频在线观看| 777米奇影视久久| 777米奇影视久久| 超碰成人久久| 国产淫语在线视频| 人成视频在线观看免费观看| 日韩av在线免费看完整版不卡| 国产一区亚洲一区在线观看| 中文乱码字字幕精品一区二区三区| 丝瓜视频免费看黄片| 国产白丝娇喘喷水9色精品| 汤姆久久久久久久影院中文字幕| 中文字幕色久视频| 久久久亚洲精品成人影院| 黄色一级大片看看| 成人亚洲精品一区在线观看| 成人手机av| 国产亚洲欧美精品永久| 超碰成人久久| 在线观看一区二区三区激情| 亚洲av电影在线进入| 欧美精品人与动牲交sv欧美| 黄频高清免费视频| 欧美bdsm另类| 久久97久久精品| 亚洲五月色婷婷综合| 国产又爽黄色视频| 美女高潮到喷水免费观看| 国产午夜精品一二区理论片| 国产成人欧美| 不卡av一区二区三区| 好男人视频免费观看在线| 美女福利国产在线| 一本大道久久a久久精品| 三上悠亚av全集在线观看| 黄片小视频在线播放| 午夜福利在线免费观看网站| 男女免费视频国产| 色网站视频免费| 91精品三级在线观看| 国产精品麻豆人妻色哟哟久久| 超碰97精品在线观看| 青春草国产在线视频| 午夜福利影视在线免费观看| www.自偷自拍.com| 欧美日韩精品网址| 亚洲精品日本国产第一区| 久久久久久免费高清国产稀缺| 日日爽夜夜爽网站| 久久久国产一区二区| 少妇被粗大猛烈的视频| 欧美日韩一区二区视频在线观看视频在线| 日韩精品有码人妻一区| 国产亚洲午夜精品一区二区久久| 黑人欧美特级aaaaaa片| 人妻少妇偷人精品九色| 少妇的逼水好多| 在线看a的网站| 亚洲国产av影院在线观看| 天美传媒精品一区二区| 老汉色∧v一级毛片| a级片在线免费高清观看视频| 欧美精品人与动牲交sv欧美| 亚洲精品国产色婷婷电影| 欧美 亚洲 国产 日韩一| av线在线观看网站| 午夜福利在线免费观看网站| 性少妇av在线| 国产精品久久久久成人av| 99久久人妻综合| 成年人免费黄色播放视频| 最黄视频免费看| 久久热在线av| 韩国av在线不卡| 18禁国产床啪视频网站| 中文天堂在线官网| 天美传媒精品一区二区| 国产深夜福利视频在线观看| 人人妻人人澡人人爽人人夜夜| a级毛片在线看网站| 亚洲天堂av无毛| 汤姆久久久久久久影院中文字幕| 亚洲经典国产精华液单| 亚洲精品一二三| av在线app专区| 大香蕉久久成人网| 国产精品一国产av| 男女啪啪激烈高潮av片| 美女大奶头黄色视频| 男的添女的下面高潮视频| 亚洲第一青青草原| av有码第一页| 亚洲av中文av极速乱| 极品人妻少妇av视频| 久久热在线av| 亚洲婷婷狠狠爱综合网| 夜夜骑夜夜射夜夜干| 校园人妻丝袜中文字幕| 亚洲国产精品一区三区| 久久人人爽av亚洲精品天堂| 校园人妻丝袜中文字幕| 日韩大片免费观看网站| 婷婷色综合www| 精品人妻一区二区三区麻豆| 成人毛片60女人毛片免费| 精品一区二区三区四区五区乱码 | 91成人精品电影| 999久久久国产精品视频| 欧美日本中文国产一区发布| av福利片在线| 日本av手机在线免费观看| 国产精品国产三级国产专区5o| 国产淫语在线视频| 欧美精品人与动牲交sv欧美| 国产日韩一区二区三区精品不卡| 午夜激情av网站| 成年女人在线观看亚洲视频| 久久av网站| 最新的欧美精品一区二区| 成人影院久久| 国产欧美日韩一区二区三区在线| 久久女婷五月综合色啪小说| 一级毛片 在线播放| 中文字幕精品免费在线观看视频| 青春草视频在线免费观看| 成人毛片a级毛片在线播放| 午夜激情久久久久久久| 一本久久精品| 一区福利在线观看| 国产精品国产三级专区第一集| 国产亚洲最大av| 欧美日韩精品网址| 国产精品国产av在线观看| 美女大奶头黄色视频| √禁漫天堂资源中文www| 最近2019中文字幕mv第一页| 久久亚洲国产成人精品v| 夫妻性生交免费视频一级片| 久久久久久久大尺度免费视频| 日韩中字成人| 五月伊人婷婷丁香| 亚洲欧洲国产日韩| 精品久久久久久电影网| 亚洲激情五月婷婷啪啪| 日本免费在线观看一区| 亚洲精品久久久久久婷婷小说| 色婷婷av一区二区三区视频| 久久久国产一区二区| 伦理电影免费视频| av天堂久久9| 久久久精品国产亚洲av高清涩受| 精品一区二区免费观看| 9191精品国产免费久久| 国产野战对白在线观看| 精品人妻偷拍中文字幕| 久久午夜综合久久蜜桃| 如何舔出高潮| 精品酒店卫生间| av在线老鸭窝| 在线观看三级黄色| 婷婷色综合大香蕉| 午夜日本视频在线| 街头女战士在线观看网站| 美女国产视频在线观看| 国产极品粉嫩免费观看在线| 欧美日韩视频精品一区| 777米奇影视久久| 少妇熟女欧美另类| 看免费成人av毛片| 搡女人真爽免费视频火全软件| 大码成人一级视频| 大片免费播放器 马上看| 伊人久久大香线蕉亚洲五| 精品国产乱码久久久久久男人| 国产成人精品久久久久久| 一本色道久久久久久精品综合| 亚洲av免费高清在线观看| 一边摸一边做爽爽视频免费| 亚洲国产看品久久| 伊人亚洲综合成人网| 精品第一国产精品| 亚洲精品一区蜜桃| 免费高清在线观看日韩| 在线观看三级黄色| 少妇熟女欧美另类| 国产精品av久久久久免费| 午夜久久久在线观看| 亚洲精品在线美女| 精品国产露脸久久av麻豆| xxx大片免费视频| 在线免费观看不下载黄p国产| 人人妻人人爽人人添夜夜欢视频| 国产成人免费观看mmmm| 麻豆乱淫一区二区| 熟女av电影| 伊人亚洲综合成人网| 成人18禁高潮啪啪吃奶动态图| 18禁动态无遮挡网站| 看免费成人av毛片| 一级,二级,三级黄色视频| 如何舔出高潮| 国产一区二区三区av在线| 秋霞伦理黄片| 国产不卡av网站在线观看| 欧美日韩一区二区视频在线观看视频在线| 在线观看免费日韩欧美大片| 18禁裸乳无遮挡动漫免费视频| 亚洲精品久久午夜乱码| 国产乱人偷精品视频| 在线看a的网站| 亚洲av电影在线观看一区二区三区| 亚洲精品在线美女| 午夜福利在线观看免费完整高清在| 97在线视频观看| 香蕉精品网在线| 国产熟女欧美一区二区| 国产激情久久老熟女| 啦啦啦啦在线视频资源| 成人亚洲欧美一区二区av| 丝袜人妻中文字幕| 日韩精品免费视频一区二区三区| 99热国产这里只有精品6| 一二三四在线观看免费中文在| 国产av精品麻豆| 久久人人爽av亚洲精品天堂| 国产又色又爽无遮挡免| 国产黄色免费在线视频| 我要看黄色一级片免费的| 美女高潮到喷水免费观看| 制服人妻中文乱码| 国产精品国产av在线观看| 成年女人毛片免费观看观看9 | 国产黄频视频在线观看| 一边摸一边做爽爽视频免费| 欧美激情高清一区二区三区 | 女的被弄到高潮叫床怎么办| 大香蕉久久成人网| 秋霞在线观看毛片| 亚洲精品自拍成人| 国产成人aa在线观看| 久久人妻熟女aⅴ| 91精品国产国语对白视频| 18禁国产床啪视频网站| 成人影院久久| 久久久欧美国产精品| 啦啦啦在线观看免费高清www| 九九爱精品视频在线观看| 大香蕉久久成人网| 青春草国产在线视频| 欧美精品人与动牲交sv欧美| 国产精品久久久久久精品电影小说| 成人亚洲精品一区在线观看| 91精品伊人久久大香线蕉| 亚洲久久久国产精品| 伦理电影免费视频| 久久这里有精品视频免费| 日韩中文字幕视频在线看片| 免费黄频网站在线观看国产| 亚洲综合色惰| 国产日韩欧美亚洲二区| 美女国产视频在线观看| av在线app专区| 99香蕉大伊视频| 在线免费观看不下载黄p国产| 国产免费福利视频在线观看| 色播在线永久视频| 久久久久久久久久久免费av| 嫩草影院入口| 久久久久久久久久久免费av| 亚洲成人手机| 亚洲成人av在线免费| 久久青草综合色| 日韩在线高清观看一区二区三区| 2018国产大陆天天弄谢| 午夜福利视频在线观看免费| 又大又黄又爽视频免费| 狠狠精品人妻久久久久久综合| 国产精品无大码| 秋霞在线观看毛片| 日韩av在线免费看完整版不卡| av女优亚洲男人天堂| 寂寞人妻少妇视频99o| 丰满少妇做爰视频| 大陆偷拍与自拍| 毛片一级片免费看久久久久| 欧美最新免费一区二区三区| 日韩欧美精品免费久久| 大陆偷拍与自拍| av卡一久久| 不卡视频在线观看欧美| 91在线精品国自产拍蜜月| 人妻一区二区av| 欧美精品av麻豆av| 1024香蕉在线观看| 国产精品欧美亚洲77777| 青春草视频在线免费观看| 国产精品人妻久久久影院| 午夜福利视频在线观看免费| 成年女人毛片免费观看观看9 | 又黄又粗又硬又大视频| 天堂中文最新版在线下载| 午夜福利影视在线免费观看| 亚洲欧美一区二区三区黑人 | 这个男人来自地球电影免费观看 | 国产又爽黄色视频| 久久久久国产一级毛片高清牌| 久久久a久久爽久久v久久| av片东京热男人的天堂| 一二三四在线观看免费中文在| av在线app专区| av卡一久久| 久热久热在线精品观看| 日韩,欧美,国产一区二区三区| 久久人妻熟女aⅴ| 国产福利在线免费观看视频| av网站在线播放免费| 欧美 日韩 精品 国产| 人体艺术视频欧美日本| 欧美bdsm另类| 成人漫画全彩无遮挡| 丝袜在线中文字幕| 老鸭窝网址在线观看| 超碰成人久久| 免费观看av网站的网址| 亚洲国产精品成人久久小说| 伊人亚洲综合成人网| 人妻少妇偷人精品九色| 国产极品天堂在线| 久久久精品区二区三区| 欧美日韩视频精品一区| 久久久久久人妻| 久久精品久久久久久噜噜老黄| 婷婷色av中文字幕| 欧美亚洲 丝袜 人妻 在线| 亚洲欧美一区二区三区国产| 亚洲精品aⅴ在线观看| 在线 av 中文字幕| 久久久久久久久久久久大奶| 韩国av在线不卡| 2022亚洲国产成人精品| 青春草国产在线视频| 成人手机av| 久久精品久久久久久久性| 大香蕉久久成人网| 黄色 视频免费看| 亚洲天堂av无毛| 亚洲成人一二三区av| 香蕉国产在线看| 免费看av在线观看网站| 汤姆久久久久久久影院中文字幕| 91精品国产国语对白视频| 国产爽快片一区二区三区| 国产精品久久久久成人av| 久久久精品免费免费高清| 欧美bdsm另类| 女性被躁到高潮视频| 精品酒店卫生间| 在线观看免费高清a一片| 国产精品.久久久| 精品国产国语对白av| 亚洲经典国产精华液单| 一级毛片我不卡| 99精国产麻豆久久婷婷| 午夜老司机福利剧场| 国产免费现黄频在线看| av不卡在线播放| 男女免费视频国产| 狂野欧美激情性bbbbbb| 这个男人来自地球电影免费观看 | 亚洲欧美日韩另类电影网站| 亚洲人成电影观看| 国产一级毛片在线| 天堂中文最新版在线下载| 中文欧美无线码| 日本-黄色视频高清免费观看| 五月伊人婷婷丁香| 婷婷色综合www| 伦精品一区二区三区| 成人毛片a级毛片在线播放| 我的亚洲天堂| 丝袜在线中文字幕| 黄频高清免费视频| 日日爽夜夜爽网站| 欧美人与善性xxx| 久久影院123| 免费看不卡的av| 欧美中文综合在线视频| 久久精品夜色国产| 久久久国产精品麻豆| 多毛熟女@视频| 久久精品国产亚洲av天美| 永久免费av网站大全| 最近中文字幕高清免费大全6| 老女人水多毛片| 边亲边吃奶的免费视频| 多毛熟女@视频| 九九爱精品视频在线观看| 精品久久久久久电影网| 日韩精品免费视频一区二区三区| 丰满乱子伦码专区| 91精品三级在线观看| 久久国产亚洲av麻豆专区| 90打野战视频偷拍视频| 亚洲精品国产av成人精品| 男女免费视频国产| 建设人人有责人人尽责人人享有的| 成人黄色视频免费在线看| 如何舔出高潮| 少妇的丰满在线观看| 精品国产一区二区三区四区第35| 国产精品免费大片| 一本一本久久a久久精品综合妖精 国产伦在线观看视频一区 | 免费在线观看视频国产中文字幕亚洲 | 男人操女人黄网站| 亚洲欧美一区二区三区国产| 亚洲精品日韩在线中文字幕| 晚上一个人看的免费电影| 久久久久久伊人网av| 成年女人在线观看亚洲视频| 精品少妇久久久久久888优播| 女性生殖器流出的白浆| 不卡av一区二区三区| 18在线观看网站| 三上悠亚av全集在线观看| 18禁裸乳无遮挡动漫免费视频| 成人午夜精彩视频在线观看| 日本爱情动作片www.在线观看| 午夜福利在线免费观看网站| 黄色视频在线播放观看不卡| 日本av免费视频播放| 亚洲少妇的诱惑av| 欧美国产精品一级二级三级| 欧美激情极品国产一区二区三区| 免费日韩欧美在线观看| 国产一区二区三区av在线| 亚洲精品一区蜜桃| 欧美另类一区| 女性生殖器流出的白浆| 久久久久精品性色| 欧美日韩精品成人综合77777| 精品亚洲成a人片在线观看| 国产精品欧美亚洲77777| 成年人免费黄色播放视频| 99久久精品国产国产毛片| 2022亚洲国产成人精品| 亚洲伊人色综图| 中文字幕色久视频| 一级爰片在线观看| 成人国产av品久久久| 又粗又硬又长又爽又黄的视频| 99久久人妻综合| 欧美bdsm另类| 国产成人欧美| 亚洲熟女精品中文字幕| 丰满饥渴人妻一区二区三| 一级,二级,三级黄色视频| 国产成人aa在线观看| 日韩av不卡免费在线播放| 黄色视频在线播放观看不卡| 欧美精品人与动牲交sv欧美| 国产一级毛片在线| 在线观看三级黄色| 国产在线视频一区二区| 女性被躁到高潮视频| 如日韩欧美国产精品一区二区三区| 国产在线一区二区三区精| 国产精品欧美亚洲77777| 大香蕉久久网| 午夜福利影视在线免费观看| 久久99精品国语久久久| 国产亚洲精品第一综合不卡| 亚洲国产精品一区三区| 国产有黄有色有爽视频| 777久久人妻少妇嫩草av网站| 欧美日韩一级在线毛片| 一区福利在线观看| 久久韩国三级中文字幕| 男女啪啪激烈高潮av片| 男人舔女人的私密视频| 亚洲内射少妇av| 欧美激情极品国产一区二区三区| 9热在线视频观看99| 免费在线观看黄色视频的| 少妇精品久久久久久久| 精品第一国产精品| 狠狠婷婷综合久久久久久88av| 久久久精品区二区三区| 可以免费在线观看a视频的电影网站 | 国产在线视频一区二区| 男人爽女人下面视频在线观看| 亚洲熟女精品中文字幕| 亚洲三级黄色毛片| 国产免费视频播放在线视频| 在线看a的网站| 精品国产超薄肉色丝袜足j| 久久久精品国产亚洲av高清涩受| 日日啪夜夜爽| 精品第一国产精品| 午夜福利在线观看免费完整高清在| 蜜桃国产av成人99| 欧美日韩一级在线毛片| av在线app专区| 免费看不卡的av| 777米奇影视久久| 国产成人精品一,二区| 爱豆传媒免费全集在线观看| tube8黄色片| 成年女人毛片免费观看观看9 | 波多野结衣av一区二区av| 欧美精品国产亚洲| 国产午夜精品一二区理论片| 天堂8中文在线网| 国产精品.久久久| 一区二区三区乱码不卡18| 亚洲第一区二区三区不卡| 久久精品夜色国产| 国产精品秋霞免费鲁丝片| 国产av一区二区精品久久| 咕卡用的链子| 电影成人av| 国产无遮挡羞羞视频在线观看| 最黄视频免费看| h视频一区二区三区| 国产免费视频播放在线视频| 久久久久久久久久久免费av| 中文字幕最新亚洲高清| 少妇的逼水好多| 国产精品亚洲av一区麻豆 | 最新中文字幕久久久久| 老汉色∧v一级毛片| 最黄视频免费看| 久久久久久人妻| 少妇的丰满在线观看| 人妻 亚洲 视频| 黄色怎么调成土黄色| 黑丝袜美女国产一区| 国产在视频线精品| 一级片免费观看大全| 国产精品国产三级国产专区5o| 99热国产这里只有精品6| 国产精品麻豆人妻色哟哟久久| 激情五月婷婷亚洲| 国产又色又爽无遮挡免| 午夜福利影视在线免费观看| 五月伊人婷婷丁香| 一区二区日韩欧美中文字幕| 丝袜美足系列| 只有这里有精品99| 欧美在线黄色| 亚洲婷婷狠狠爱综合网| 如日韩欧美国产精品一区二区三区| 国产精品久久久av美女十八| 卡戴珊不雅视频在线播放| 亚洲精品,欧美精品| 亚洲欧美色中文字幕在线| 综合色丁香网| 边亲边吃奶的免费视频| 亚洲少妇的诱惑av| 啦啦啦中文免费视频观看日本| 亚洲激情五月婷婷啪啪| 欧美av亚洲av综合av国产av | 久热久热在线精品观看| 国产片内射在线| 中文字幕人妻丝袜制服|