• 
    

    
    

      99热精品在线国产_美女午夜性视频免费_国产精品国产高清国产av_av欧美777_自拍偷自拍亚洲精品老妇_亚洲熟女精品中文字幕_www日本黄色视频网_国产精品野战在线观看

      ?

      不同劑量羥考酮對男性患者全麻蘇醒期導尿管留置反應的治療作用

      2017-05-11 18:50:31陳鳳收李曉倩馬虹
      中國醫(yī)藥導報 2017年7期
      關鍵詞:羥考酮全麻

      陳鳳收+李曉倩+馬虹

      [摘要] 目的 觀察不同劑量羥考酮對男性患者全麻蘇醒期導尿管留置反應的治療作用。 方法 選擇2016年6~11月于中國醫(yī)科大學附屬第一醫(yī)院行擇期非泌尿系統手術蘇醒期出現導尿管留置不適的男性患者120例,年齡20~60歲,美國麻醉醫(yī)師協會(ASA)分級Ⅰ~Ⅱ級,采用隨機數字表法分為A、B、C、D組,每組各30例。A、B、C組患者分別靜脈注射羥考酮0.03、0.05、0.07 mg/kg,所有藥物統一稀釋至5 mL,D組患者靜脈注射5 mL生理鹽水。觀察四組患者用藥前后視覺模擬評分法(VAS)評分、睡眠障礙鎮(zhèn)靜評分(Ramsay評分)、生命體征變化、導尿管留置反應及不良反應。 結果 用藥后A、B、C組的VAS評分、平均動脈壓(MAP)、心率(HR)均低于D組(P < 0.05),Ramsay評分高于D組(P < 0.05);B、C組患者過度鎮(zhèn)靜發(fā)生率高于A組(P < 0.05)。A、B、C組對全麻蘇醒期導尿管留置不適治療效果差異無統計學意義(P > 0.05),均優(yōu)于D組(P < 0.05)。四組患者惡心嘔吐的發(fā)生率差異無統計學意義(P > 0.05)。 結論 靜脈注射小劑量(0.03 mg/kg)羥考酮能夠治療男性患者全麻蘇醒期尿管留置不適,減輕術后疼痛,有利于血流動力學穩(wěn)定,而且不增加過度鎮(zhèn)靜及惡心嘔吐的發(fā)生。

      [關鍵詞] 羥考酮;男性;全麻;導尿管留置反應

      [中圖分類號] R614.2 [文獻標識碼] A [文章編號] 1673-7210(2017)03(a)-0057-04

      Therapeutical effect of different doses of Oxycodone on urethral catheter-related reaction during anesthesia recovery period after general anaesthesia in male adult patients

      CHEN Fengshou LI Xiaoqian MA Hong

      Department of Anesthesiology, the First Hospital of China Medical University, Liaoning Province, Shenyang 110001, China

      [Abstract] Objective To observe curative effects of different doses of Oxycodone on urethral catheter-related reaction during anesthesia recovery period after general anaesthesia in male adult patients. Methods 120 male patients underwent elective surgery except urinary system and had urethral catheter-related reaction during anesthesia recovery period from June to November 2016 in the First Hospital Affiliated to China Medical University were enrolled, aged from 20 to 60, the American society of anesthesiologists (ASA) was Ⅰ-Ⅱ grade. All the patients were divided into four groups: group A, group B, group C, group D, according to the random number table, with 30 cases in each group. Patients of group A, group B, group C were allocated to receive Oxycodone 0.03, 0.05, 0.07 mg/kg respectively, all drugs were diluted to 5 mL with saline. Patients of group D were allocated to receive saline 5 mL. Visual analogue scale (VAS) score, Ramsay score, vital signs change, urethral catheter-related reaction before and after treatment, and adverse reactions were recorded. Results After treatment, VAS score, mean arterial pressure (MAP), heart rate (HR) of group A, group B, group C were lower than those of group D. Ramsay scores of group A, guoup B and grouup C were higher than that of group D, with statistically significant differences (P < 0.05); but the incidence of excessive sedation was significantly higher in group B and group C than that in group A (P < 0.05). Oxycodone cured urethral catheter-related reaction in group A, group B and group C effectively, the curative effects did not differ obviously (P > 0.05), and which were better than that of group D statistically (P < 0.05). No statistical difference in the incidence of nausea and vomiting was observed among the four groups (P > 0.05). Conclusion Intravenous administration of low-dose (0.03 mg/kg) Oxycodone is more suitable for treating urethral catheter-related reaction after general anaesthesia in male adult patients, also can reduce postoperative pain, which is beneficial to the stability of hemodynamics, and does not increase the incidence of excessive sedation, nausea and vomiting.

      [Key words] Oxycodone; Male patients; General anaesthesia; Urethral catheter-related reaction

      全麻患者蘇醒期導尿管留置不適是引起患者蘇醒期躁動的重要原因之一。導尿管源性的膀胱刺激征發(fā)生率為47%~90%[1]。嚴重的導尿管留置不適可能會引起手術切口裂開、出血、循環(huán)系統不穩(wěn)定、心律失常、冠脈疾病惡化等并發(fā)癥,并可能加重術后疼痛,延長住院時間。因此,預防和治療患者全麻蘇醒期導尿管留置不適有十分重要的臨床意義。研究表明,阿片類藥物能預防導尿管源性膀胱刺激征[2-3],緩解全麻蘇醒期導尿管留置不適,但羥考酮用于治療男性患者全麻蘇醒期導尿管留置反應的研究較少。本研究擬觀察不同劑量羥考酮對男性患者全麻蘇醒期導尿管留置不適的治療作用。

      1 資料與方法

      1.1 一般資料

      選擇2016年6~11月于中國醫(yī)科大學附屬第一醫(yī)院(以下簡稱“我院”)行擇期非泌尿系統手術的男性患者,患者蘇醒后在麻醉恢復室(PACU)評估導尿管留置不適情況,其中,0分:無不適自覺癥狀;1分:輕度不適,僅在被詢問時訴尿路不適,可忍受;2分:中度不適,有明顯自覺癥狀,主動表述,尚可忍受,無行為反應;3分:重度不適,有明顯自覺癥狀,主動表述,不能忍受,有身體行為反應,如四肢亂動、試圖拔掉尿管、語言反應激烈等[2-3]。評分為2分及以上認為發(fā)生了導尿管留置不適反應。

      選擇出現導尿管留置不適的男性患者120例,年齡20~60歲,美國麻醉醫(yī)師協會(ASA)分級Ⅰ~Ⅱ級,采用隨機數字表法分為A、B、C、D組,每組30例。排除既往有精神疾病、泌尿系統疾病、心腦血管系統疾病、肝腎功能不全或導尿管置入不順利患者。四組患者ASA分級、年齡、體重指數、手術時間、麻醉時間、尿管留置不適情況比較,差異均無統計學意義(P > 0.05),具有可比性,見表1。所有患者知情同意并簽署知情同意書,且本研究獲我院醫(yī)學倫理委員會批準。

      1.2 方法

      擇期非泌尿系統手術患者入手術室后均開放靜脈,誘導前靜脈注射咪達唑侖2 mg。誘導時依次靜脈注射舒芬太尼0.5 μg/kg、順式阿曲庫銨2 mg/kg、依托咪酯2 mg/kg。實施麻醉誘導后經口氣管插管?;颊呔谌檎T導后插同規(guī)格同型號的導尿管。靜脈持續(xù)輸注丙泊酚復合吸入七氟醚維持麻醉,隨麻醉深度調整用量,維持BIS值40~60,順式阿曲庫銨2~3 mg間斷靜脈注射。手術結束前30 min靜脈注射舒芬太尼5 μg和鹽酸托烷司瓊5 mg,結束前10 min停用七氟醚,手術結束后停用丙泊酚。術后患者轉入PACU,符合拔管指征后由PACU麻醉醫(yī)師拔除氣管導管。由一名麻醉醫(yī)生評估患者的導尿管留置反應情況,對于出現導尿管留置不適的患者,依據分組A、B、C組患者分別靜脈注射羥考酮(批號:BN868,萌蒂制藥有限公司,中國)0.03、0.05、0.07 mg/kg,所有藥物統一稀釋至5 mL,D組患者靜脈注射5 mL生理鹽水。由一名對麻醉藥和分組不知情的研究者進行給藥。

      1.3 觀察指標

      記錄四組患者ASA分級、年齡、身高、體重、手術時間、麻醉時間、用藥前后的平均動脈壓(MAP)、心率(HR)、脈搏血氧飽和度(SpO2)、視覺模擬評分法(VAS)評分、睡眠障礙鎮(zhèn)靜評分(Ramsay評分)、導尿管留置不適情況。VAS法評分標準:0分為無痛;1~3分為有輕微疼痛,患者能忍受;4~6分為患者疼痛并影響睡眠,尚能忍受;7~10分為患者有劇烈疼痛,疼痛難忍。Ramsay評分標準:1分為不安靜、煩躁;2分為安靜、合作;3分為嗜睡、能聽從指令;4分為睡眠狀態(tài)、可喚醒;5分為呼喚反應遲鈍;6分為深睡狀態(tài)、呼喚不醒;其中,5~6分為過度鎮(zhèn)靜。同時,記錄四組患者用藥后過度鎮(zhèn)靜、惡心嘔吐等不良反應。

      1.4 統計學方法

      采用SPSS 19.0統計學軟件進行數據分析,計量資料數據用均數±標準差(x±s)表示,兩組間比較采用t檢驗;多組間比較采用單因素方差分析;計數資料用率表示,組間比較采用χ2檢驗,以P < 0.05為差異有統計學意義。

      2 結果

      2.1 四組患者用藥前后VAS評分比較

      組內比較,A、B、C組患者用藥后VAS評分均低于用藥前(P < 0.05);D組用藥前后VAS評分差異無統計學意義(P > 0.05)。組間比較,四組患者用藥前VAS評分差異無統計學(P > 0.05);C組患者用藥后VAS評分低于A組、B組(P < 0.05),A、B組患者用藥后VAS評分差異無統計學意義(P > 0.05);D組患者用藥后VAS評分高于其他三組(P < 0.05)。見表2。

      2.2 四組患者用藥前后Ramsay評分比較

      組內比較,A、B、C組患者用藥后的Ramsay評分高于用藥前(P < 0.05);D組用前藥后Ramsay評分差異無統計學意義(P > 0.05)。組間比較,四組患者用藥前Ramsay評分差異無統計學意義(P > 0.05);用藥后C組患者Ramsay評分顯著高于其他三組(P < 0.05);D組患者Ramsay評分顯著低于其他三組(P < 0.05);A、B組患者用藥后Ramsay評分差異無統計學意義(P > 0.05)。見表2。

      2.3 四組患者MAP、HR、SpO2比較

      組內比較,A、B、C組患者用藥后MAP、HR均低于用藥前(P < 0.05);D組患者用藥后MAP、HR高于用藥前(P < 0.05);四組患者用藥前后SpO2差異無統計學意義(P > 0.05)。組間比較,用藥前四組患者MAP、HR、SpO2差異無統計學意義(P > 0.05);用藥后,A、B、C組患者MAP、HR差異無統計學意義(P > 0.05),均低于D組(P < 0.05);四組患者用藥后SpO2差異無統計學意義(P > 0.05)。見表3。

      2.4 四組患者用藥后導尿管留置不適情況比較

      用藥后A、B、C組尿管留置不適治療效果差異無統計學意義(P > 0.05),均優(yōu)于D組(P < 0.05)。見表4。

      2.5 不良反應

      用藥后B組有5例患者發(fā)生了過度鎮(zhèn)靜,C組有7例患者發(fā)生了過度鎮(zhèn)靜,發(fā)生率高于A組(0例),差異有統計學意義(P < 0.05)。四組患者惡心嘔吐的發(fā)生情況(A組2例,B組1例,C組1例,D組2例)差異無統計學意義(P > 0.05)。

      3 討論

      全麻誘導后導尿,患者對導尿過程中的疼痛以及導尿管留置不適均無體驗和預適應,因此蘇醒期患者經常出現導尿管留置不適反應。研究表明,型號大于18fr Foley導尿管和男性是PACU中患者發(fā)生導尿管源性膀胱不適的獨立危險因素[4]。導尿管留置不適反應癥狀類似于膀胱過度活動引起的癥狀:尿頻尿急,伴或不伴隨緊迫性尿失禁,與M受體介導的膀胱非自主性收縮相關[5]。目前研究表明,M受體拮抗劑丁基東莨菪堿、奧昔布寧和托特羅定能夠降低尿管源性膀胱刺激征的發(fā)生率,減輕其嚴重程度[6-10]。膀胱的副交感神經為來自脊髓第2~4骶節(jié)的盆內臟神經,支配膀胱逼尿肌,抑制尿道括約肌,是與排尿有關的主要神經。研究表明,陰部神經或陰莖背神經阻滯對導尿管源性膀胱不適有預防效果[11-13]。

      曲馬多、舒芬太尼等阿片類藥物能緩解導尿管源性膀胱不適[3-4]。羥考酮是純阿片μ和κ受體激動藥。動物實驗表明,κ受體與內臟痛相關[14]。基因敲除實驗證實,κ受體缺失對內臟炎癥和內臟痛更加敏感[15]。羥考酮主要通過與κ受體結合,特別是κ2b受體發(fā)揮作用,與μ受體親和力較低[16]。目前羥考酮廣泛應用于治療術后疼痛、癌性疼痛及神經痛等方面[17-20]。本研究顯示,對于全麻蘇醒期發(fā)生導尿管留置不適的患者,靜脈注射羥考酮后A、B、C組患者VAS評分、MAP、HR均顯著低于D組(P < 0.05),說明靜脈注射羥考酮能夠緩解導尿管留置不適患者的疼痛,有利于患者的血流動力學的穩(wěn)定。A、B、C組全麻蘇醒期導尿管留置不適治療效果差異無統計學意義(P > 0.05),均顯著優(yōu)于D組(P < 0.05),但B、C組患者過度鎮(zhèn)靜發(fā)生率較A組增加(P < 0.05),提示0.03 mg/kg羥考酮能夠緩解全麻患者蘇醒期尿管留置不適,而且不增加過度鎮(zhèn)靜的發(fā)生。本研究中,四組患者惡心嘔吐的發(fā)生率差異無統計學意義(P > 0.05),提示使用羥考酮并未增加惡心嘔吐的發(fā)生率。

      綜上所述,靜脈注射小劑量(0.03 mg/kg)羥考酮能夠治療男性患者全麻患者蘇醒期尿管留置不適,減輕術后疼痛,而且不增加不良反應,能夠安全地用于男性患者全麻蘇醒期導尿留置不適的治療。

      [參考文獻]

      [1] Bai Y,Wang X,Li X,et al. Management of catheter-related bladder discomfort in patients who underwent elective surgery [J]. J Endourol,2015,29(6):640-649.

      [2] Agarwal A,Yadav G,Gupta D,et al. Evaluation of intra-operative tramadol for prevention of catheter-related bladder discomfort:aprospective,randomized,double-blind study [J]. Br J Anaesth,2008,101(4):506-510.

      [3] 尹加林,史宏偉,徐磊,等.舒芬太尼對男性患者全麻蘇醒期導尿管留置反應的作用[J].臨床麻醉學雜志,2011, 27(2):139-141.

      [4] Binhas M,Motamed C,Hawajri N,et al. Predictors of catheter-related bladder discomfort in the post-anaesthesia care unit [J]. Ann Fr Anesth Reanim,2011,30(2):122-125.

      [5] Agarwal A,Gupta D,Kumar M,et al. Ketamine for treatment of catheter related bladder discomfort:a prospective,randomized,placebo-controlled and double blind study [J]. Br J Anaesth,2006,96(5):587-589.

      [6] Agarwal A,Dhiraaj S,Singhal V,et al. Comparison of efficacy of oxybutynin and tolterodine for prevention of catheter related bladder discomfort:a prospective,randomized,placebo-controlled,double-blind study [J]. Br J Anaesth,2006,96(3):377-380.

      [7] Agarwal A,Raza M,Singhal V,et al. The efficacy of tolterodine for prevention of catheter-related bladder discomfort:a prospective,randomized,placebo-controlled,double-blind study [J]. Anesth Analg,2005,101(4):1065-1067.

      [8] Shariat Moharari R,Lajevardi M,Khajavi M,et al. Effects of intra-operative ketamine administration on postoperative catheter-related bladder discomfort:a double-blind clinical trial [J]. Pain Pract,2014,14(2):146-150.

      [9] Safavi M,Honarmand A,Atari M,et al. An evaluation of the efficacy of different doses of ketamine for treatment of catheter-related bladderdiscomfort in patients underwent urologic surgery:A prospective,randomized,placebo-controlled,double-blind study [J]. Urol Ann,2014,6(1):51-56.

      [10] Ryu JH,Hwang JW,Lee JW,et al. Efficacy of butylscopolamine for the treatment of catheter-related bladder discomfort:a prospective,randomized,placebo-controlled,double-blind study [J]. Br J Anaesth,2013,111(6):932-937.

      [11] Li JY,Yi ML,Liao R. Dorsal Penile Nerve Block With Ropivacaine-Reduced Postoperative Catheter-Related Bladder Discomfort in Male Patients After Emergence of General Anesthesia:A Prospective,Randomized,Controlled Study [J]. Medicine(Baltimore),2016,95(15):e3409.

      [12] Li JY,Liao R. Dorsal penile nerve block with Ropivacaine versus intravenous tramadol for the prevention of catheter-related bladder discomfort:study protocol for a randomized controlled trial [J]. Trials,2015,16:596.

      [13] Li JY,Liao R. Prevention of catheter-related bladder discomfort-pudendal nerve block with ropivacaineversus intravenous tramadol:study protocol for a randomized controlled trial [J]. Trials,2016,17(1):448.

      [14] Riley J,Eisenberg E,Müller-Schwefe G,et al.Oxycodone:a review of its use in the management of pain [J]. Curr Med Res Opin,2008,24(1):175-192.

      [15] 徐建國.鹽酸羥考酮的藥理學和臨床應用[J].臨床麻醉學雜志,2014,30(5):512-513.

      [16] Nielsen CK,Ross FB,Lotfipour S,et al. Oxycodone and morphine have distinctly different pharmacological profiles: radioligand binding and behavioural studies in two rat models of neuropathic pain [J]. Pain,2007,132(3):289-300.

      [17] Schmidt-Hansen M,Bennett MI,Hilgart J. Oxycodone for Cancer Pain in Adult Patients [J]. JAMA,2015,314(12):1282-1283.

      [18] Gaskell H,Derry S,Stannard C,et al. Oxycodone for neuropathic pain in adults [J]. Cochrane Database Syst Rev,2016,7:CD010692.

      [19] Kokki H,Kokki M,Sjvall S. Oxycodone for the treatment of postoperative pain [J]. Expert Opin Pharmacother,2012,13(7):1045-1058.

      [20] Pergolizzi JV Jr,Seow-Choen F,Wexner SD,et al. Perspectives on Intravenous Oxycodone for Control of Postoperative Pain [J]. Pain Pract,2016,16(7):924-934.

      猜你喜歡
      羥考酮全麻
      腹部神經阻滯聯合靜吸復合全麻在中老年腹腔鏡手術中的應用
      蟾蜈止痛膏聯合鹽酸羥考酮緩釋片治療中、重度癌性疼痛的臨床觀察
      肥胖與全麻誘導期氧儲備的相關性
      護理干預在手術室全麻留置導尿管患者中的應用效果觀察
      羥考酮注射液對腹腔鏡結直腸癌患者術后鎮(zhèn)痛效果的影響
      鹽酸羥考酮控釋片與硫酸嗎啡控釋片在癌性內臟痛患者治療中的止痛作用及不良反應比較
      癌癥進展(2016年9期)2016-08-22 11:33:20
      鹽酸羥考酮緩釋片聯合超聲電導儀治療中重度癌痛的臨床研究
      探討靜吸復合全麻與靶控輸注對老年高血壓患者麻醉深度的影響
      兩種麻醉鎮(zhèn)靜深度監(jiān)測技術在全麻中的應用比較
      老年患者全麻誘導與血流動力學變化
      安仁县| 福安市| 东兰县| 米林县| 安龙县| 徐水县| 句容市| 南昌县| 迭部县| 江西省| 乳山市| 博白县| 确山县| 新泰市| 广平县| 海城市| 崇阳县| 浦江县| 固安县| 渭源县| 页游| 临武县| 伊吾县| 平果县| 汤阴县| 马鞍山市| 临夏县| 绥芬河市| 修武县| 保德县| 张家川| 辰溪县| 会同县| 新津县| 博爱县| 鄢陵县| 贵德县| 北川| 新野县| 榕江县| 桃源县|