李穎 通耀威 郭駒 王毅 陳軍仿 宋云林
[摘要] 心臟手術(shù)圍術(shù)期血流動(dòng)力學(xué)易發(fā)生較大波動(dòng),若不及時(shí)發(fā)現(xiàn)及迅速糾正血流動(dòng)力學(xué)紊亂,將導(dǎo)致災(zāi)難性地后果,因此,心功能監(jiān)測(cè)在心臟手術(shù)圍術(shù)期極為重要。關(guān)于心功能監(jiān)測(cè)的方法一直都是研究的重點(diǎn),以期應(yīng)用最安全、最快速地技術(shù)獲取最準(zhǔn)確地監(jiān)測(cè)以指導(dǎo)血流動(dòng)力學(xué)治療,改善患者預(yù)后。近年來,國(guó)內(nèi)外學(xué)者為達(dá)最優(yōu)化的心功能監(jiān)測(cè),在傳統(tǒng)監(jiān)測(cè)方法(肺動(dòng)脈導(dǎo)管)基礎(chǔ)上,研發(fā)了許多新型監(jiān)測(cè)技術(shù),如脈搏指示連續(xù)心排量(Pulse-indicated continuous cardiac output,PiCCO)、鋰稀釋心排量(Lithium-indicated dilution cardiac output,LiDCO)、FloTrac/Vigileo、ProAQT/PulsioFlex監(jiān)測(cè)系統(tǒng)、經(jīng)食管多普勒(Transesophageal doppler,TD)、Nexfin、無創(chuàng)超聲心排量監(jiān)測(cè)(Ultrasonic cardiac output monitoring,USCOM)、經(jīng)胸生物電阻抗(Thoracic electrical bioimpedance,TEB)等,臨床上應(yīng)根據(jù)實(shí)際條件及監(jiān)測(cè)要求選擇適當(dāng)?shù)姆椒?。本文介紹每種方法的基本原理、臨床應(yīng)用以及優(yōu)缺點(diǎn),為心功能監(jiān)測(cè)在臨床中的應(yīng)用提供新思路。
[關(guān)鍵詞] 心臟圍術(shù)期;心功能;監(jiān)測(cè)方法;臨床應(yīng)用
[中圖分類號(hào)] R446.6? ? ? ? ? [文獻(xiàn)標(biāo)識(shí)碼] A? ? ? ? ? [文章編號(hào)] 1673-9701(2021)16-0188-05
Application of cardiac function monitoring method in clinic
LI Ying? ?TONG Yaowei? ?GUO Ju? ?WANG Yi? ?CHEN Junfang? ?SONG Yunlin
Intensive Care Unit, the First Affiliated Hospital of Xinjiang Medical University, Urumqi? ?830054, China
[Abstract] Perioperative hemodynamics of cardiac surgery are prone to large fluctuations. If hemodynamic disorders are not detected and quickly corrected in time, it will lead to catastrophic consequences. Therefore, cardiac function monitoring is extremely important in the perioperative period of cardiac surgery. The method of cardiac function monitoring has always been the focus of research, in order to apply the safest and fastest technology to obtain the most accurate monitoring to guide hemodynamic therapy and improve patient prognosis. In recent years, scholars at home and abroad have developed many new monitoring technologies based on traditional monitoring methods (pulmonary artery catheters) in order to achieve optimal cardiac function monitoring, such as pulse-indicated continuous cardiac output (PiCCO),lithium-indicated dilution cardiac output (LiDCO), FloTrac/Vigileo, ProAQT/PulsioFlex monitoring system, transesophageal Doppler (TD), Nexfin, non-invasive ultrasound cardiac output monitoring (ultrasonic cardiac output monitoring) Output monitoring (USCOM), transthoracic electrical bioimpedance (TEB), etc., which should be selected clinically according to actual conditions and monitoring requirements.This article introduces the basic principles, clinical applications, advantages and disadvantages of each method, and provides new ideas for the clinical application of cardiac function monitoring.
[Key words] Cardiac perioperative period; Cardiac function; Monitoring method; Clinical application
心臟手術(shù)圍術(shù)期心功能監(jiān)測(cè)的主要目的是維護(hù)組織氧氣供給和需求之間的平衡,在各種情況下心臟手術(shù)圍術(shù)期血流動(dòng)力學(xué)常有較大波動(dòng),易造成不良后果,需提供有效的監(jiān)測(cè)方法以動(dòng)態(tài)監(jiān)測(cè)患者心功能狀態(tài)[1]。理想的監(jiān)測(cè)方法應(yīng)易于使用且容易獲取,可獨(dú)立操作、快速響應(yīng),并且可有效、精確地指導(dǎo)治療,具有最優(yōu)成本—效果關(guān)系。隨著醫(yī)學(xué)技術(shù)的發(fā)展,近年來涌現(xiàn)出許多新型技術(shù),趨于無創(chuàng)、精準(zhǔn)、動(dòng)態(tài)、實(shí)時(shí)地監(jiān)測(cè)心功能[2]。目前心功能監(jiān)測(cè)方法分為有創(chuàng)、微創(chuàng)和無創(chuàng),主要目標(biāo)均為防止組織缺氧以及早期目標(biāo)-導(dǎo)向治療(Early goal-directed therapy,EGDT)。本文總結(jié)近年來最新研究進(jìn)展,希望為醫(yī)務(wù)工作者在臨床中應(yīng)用心功能監(jiān)測(cè)方法提供新思路。
1 有創(chuàng)監(jiān)測(cè)方法
肺動(dòng)脈導(dǎo)管(Pulmonary artery catheter,PAC),即Swan-Ganz漂浮導(dǎo)管,能夠提供可靠的血流動(dòng)力學(xué)參數(shù),可實(shí)時(shí)管理血流動(dòng)力學(xué)紊亂,是監(jiān)測(cè)心排量(Cardiac output,CO)的“金標(biāo)準(zhǔn)”[3]。使用漂浮導(dǎo)管,通過中心靜脈穿刺引導(dǎo)順血流方向漂浮至右心直到肺動(dòng)脈,利用熱稀釋法可以測(cè)量肺動(dòng)脈壓、肺動(dòng)脈嵌頓壓、右心房壓、CO、混合靜脈血氧飽和度(Oxygen saturation of mixed venose blood,SvO2)、右心室容積及右心室射血分?jǐn)?shù),評(píng)估心臟前負(fù)荷、后負(fù)荷及心功能狀態(tài),指導(dǎo)精準(zhǔn)治療。Joseph等[4]對(duì)心臟術(shù)后常規(guī)應(yīng)用PAC的安全性和有效性的研究顯示,PAC對(duì)患者死亡率、并發(fā)癥發(fā)生率、重癥監(jiān)護(hù)病房(Intensive care unit,ICU)住院時(shí)間、總住院時(shí)間并無明顯改善,治療費(fèi)用較高,而且還可能增加高?;颊叩乃劳雎?,故對(duì)于接受心臟手術(shù)有較低血流動(dòng)力學(xué)紊亂風(fēng)險(xiǎn)的患者,不應(yīng)常規(guī)使用。PAC使用過程中存在很多并發(fā)癥,如肺動(dòng)脈破裂、氣胸、心包填塞、心律失常、感染、導(dǎo)管打結(jié)、血栓形成導(dǎo)致栓塞等,以及測(cè)量誤差如溫度的變化、熱敏電阻故障、導(dǎo)管尖端凝血、導(dǎo)管盤繞或注射時(shí)間>4 s等都可能導(dǎo)致不準(zhǔn)確的數(shù)值[5]。PAC可精準(zhǔn)地監(jiān)測(cè)血流動(dòng)力學(xué)參數(shù)以指導(dǎo)圍術(shù)期循環(huán)穩(wěn)定的治療,但操作方法相對(duì)復(fù)雜、非連續(xù)監(jiān)測(cè)、并發(fā)癥較多且嚴(yán)重,風(fēng)險(xiǎn)較高,因此在使用過程中應(yīng)權(quán)衡利弊、正確選擇。
2 微創(chuàng)監(jiān)測(cè)方法
2.1 脈搏指示連續(xù)心排量監(jiān)測(cè)(Pulse-indicated continuous cardiac output,PiCCO)
PiCCO由一個(gè)動(dòng)脈導(dǎo)管和其尖端的5 mm固態(tài)熱敏電阻及一個(gè)連接到標(biāo)準(zhǔn)中心靜脈導(dǎo)管遠(yuǎn)端腔的注射裝置共同組成,通過脈搏波輪廓分析進(jìn)行實(shí)時(shí)、連續(xù)監(jiān)測(cè)并與經(jīng)肺熱稀釋法相結(jié)合[6],可獲得CO、全心舒張末期容積(Global end diastolic volume,GEDV)、全心射血分?jǐn)?shù)(Cardiac ejection fraction,GEF)、胸腔內(nèi)血容量(Intrathoracic blood volume,ITBV)、血管外肺水(Extravascular lung water,EVLW)、心功能指數(shù)(Cardiac function index,CFI)、每搏輸出量變異度(Stroke volume variation,SVV)、脈壓變異率(Pulse pressure variation,PPV)、全身血管阻力(Systemic vascular resistance,SVR)、肺血管滲透指數(shù)(Pulmonary vascular permeability index,PVPI)、左心室收縮力指數(shù)(dp/dt max)等。PiCCO不但可以測(cè)量連續(xù)CO,還可以測(cè)量ITBV和EVLW,能更好地反映心臟前負(fù)荷和肺水腫,而且不需要X線幫助確定導(dǎo)管位置[7]。除測(cè)量參數(shù)較多以外,還具備損傷小、操作簡(jiǎn)單、各類參數(shù)更為直觀、實(shí)時(shí)監(jiān)測(cè)CO、受人為干擾因素少等優(yōu)點(diǎn)。但存在心內(nèi)分流、主動(dòng)脈瘤、主動(dòng)脈狹窄、體外循環(huán)、血管順應(yīng)性差、設(shè)備中氣泡、導(dǎo)管中凝血、嚴(yán)重心律失常等時(shí)會(huì)影響測(cè)量數(shù)據(jù)的精準(zhǔn)性[8]。郎利等[9]對(duì)30例不停跳冠脈搭橋術(shù)中應(yīng)用PiCCO監(jiān)測(cè)患者血流動(dòng)力學(xué),結(jié)果顯示30例患者均順利康復(fù),無并發(fā)癥發(fā)生。潘傳亮等[10]在一項(xiàng)前瞻性觀察性研究中發(fā)現(xiàn),對(duì)體外循環(huán)心臟術(shù)后患者應(yīng)用PiCCO目標(biāo)導(dǎo)向地指導(dǎo)治療能夠降低急性腎損傷的發(fā)生率并能改善病情嚴(yán)重程度。PiCCO能夠準(zhǔn)確、連續(xù)、實(shí)時(shí)、全面地監(jiān)測(cè)患者心功能,具備操作簡(jiǎn)單、并發(fā)癥少以及微創(chuàng)等特點(diǎn),對(duì)心臟手術(shù)圍術(shù)期患者的監(jiān)測(cè)和治療起到了重要作用,近年來在心臟重癥領(lǐng)域應(yīng)用越來越廣泛。
2.2 鋰稀釋心排量監(jiān)測(cè)(Lithium-indicated dilution cardiac output,LiDCO)
LiDCO由一個(gè)連接在動(dòng)脈導(dǎo)管上的鋰傳感器組成,鋰指示劑通過中心靜脈或外周靜脈注入,并使用連接至壓力線的鋰傳感器探頭測(cè)量外周動(dòng)脈中的鋰濃度來構(gòu)建鋰衰減曲線,聯(lián)合脈搏波輪廓分析技術(shù),可獲得連續(xù)實(shí)時(shí)CO、ITBV、平均動(dòng)脈壓(Mean arterial pressure,MAP)、SVR、每搏輸出量(Stroke volume,SV)、SVV、PPV等,其準(zhǔn)確性已獲得驗(yàn)證,但臨床應(yīng)用尚不廣泛[11]。LiDCO侵入性更小,只需要一個(gè)動(dòng)脈和一個(gè)外周靜脈通路,而且還可以提供特殊參數(shù),如SVV和PPV。但是,在以下情況下,LiDCO的準(zhǔn)確性會(huì)受到影響:主動(dòng)脈瓣返流、嚴(yán)重心律失常、嚴(yán)重的外周血管收縮以及接受鋰療法的患者[12]。Asamoto等[13]在非體外循環(huán)冠脈搭橋手術(shù)期間比較LiDCO與PAC在固定采樣點(diǎn)同時(shí)測(cè)量心臟指數(shù)(Cardiac index,CI),結(jié)果顯示LiDCO測(cè)量誤差約為-0.38 L(/min·m2),百分比誤差為53.5%,尤其當(dāng)CI值較高時(shí),LiDCO測(cè)量值往往偏低。因此,此方法在心臟外科圍術(shù)期心功能監(jiān)測(cè)中的應(yīng)用價(jià)值受限。
2.3 FloTrac/Vigileo系統(tǒng)
FloTrac/Vigileo系統(tǒng)由連接至動(dòng)脈導(dǎo)管和Vigileo監(jiān)護(hù)儀的血流傳感器(FloTrac)組成,通過分析外周動(dòng)脈波形和預(yù)置數(shù)據(jù)庫(kù)來監(jiān)測(cè)心血管功能,不需要外部校準(zhǔn)即可測(cè)量CO、SV、SVV、SVR等,并通過使用肺動(dòng)脈導(dǎo)管來降低侵襲性[14]。其優(yōu)點(diǎn)在于創(chuàng)傷小,提供連續(xù)實(shí)時(shí)CO,且操作簡(jiǎn)單、參數(shù)易于獲得,但其準(zhǔn)確性在病情不穩(wěn)定、嚴(yán)重心律失常、嚴(yán)重主動(dòng)脈瓣返流和其他干擾動(dòng)脈波形的因素中受到限制。雖然此系統(tǒng)每一次更新都顯示出精度的提高,但最新一代在準(zhǔn)確性上仍然難以和“金標(biāo)準(zhǔn)”相提并論。Kusaka等[15]在一項(xiàng)前瞻性研究中,對(duì)30例接受體外循環(huán)的心臟手術(shù)患者應(yīng)用最新一代系統(tǒng)(第四代)與PAC對(duì)比進(jìn)行監(jiān)測(cè)時(shí)發(fā)現(xiàn),其在心臟手術(shù)圍術(shù)期仍然缺乏準(zhǔn)確性和預(yù)測(cè)能力,而且CO測(cè)量的差異取決于SVR。Maeda等[16]在對(duì)26例腹主動(dòng)脈瘤患者手術(shù)中應(yīng)用第四代系統(tǒng)監(jiān)測(cè)血流動(dòng)力學(xué),結(jié)果顯示其準(zhǔn)確性不可接受。因此,臨床醫(yī)生應(yīng)該認(rèn)識(shí)到在心臟手術(shù)圍術(shù)期使用該方法時(shí)的適當(dāng)用途和局限性。
2.4 ProAQT/PulsioFlex監(jiān)測(cè)系統(tǒng)
ProAQT/PulsioFlex是一種新型脈搏輪廓分析設(shè)備,與PiCCO相似,但有所不同的是此方法不需要外部校準(zhǔn),主要應(yīng)用一種創(chuàng)新的專有運(yùn)算實(shí)現(xiàn)自動(dòng)校準(zhǔn)[17]。一項(xiàng)多中心隨機(jī)對(duì)照試驗(yàn)顯示[18],應(yīng)用此方法監(jiān)測(cè)圍術(shù)期患者血流動(dòng)力學(xué),并以此為基礎(chǔ)的EGDT可改善患者預(yù)后。Weil等[19]在中高危風(fēng)險(xiǎn)腹部手術(shù)中應(yīng)用此方法監(jiān)測(cè)患者血流動(dòng)力學(xué)的研究顯示,其準(zhǔn)確性是可靠的。Biais等[20]在探討SVR對(duì)此方法準(zhǔn)確性的影響中發(fā)現(xiàn),當(dāng)SVR變化較大時(shí),盡管有自動(dòng)校準(zhǔn),也無法跟蹤C(jī)I的變化。有學(xué)者[21]在非體外循環(huán)冠脈搭橋術(shù)中應(yīng)用其監(jiān)測(cè)患者心功能,結(jié)果顯示CO的測(cè)量仍存在局限性。因此,此方法在心臟手術(shù)圍術(shù)期的應(yīng)用還需進(jìn)一步探究和驗(yàn)證。
2.5 經(jīng)食管多普勒(Transesophageal doppler,TD)
TD使用多普勒超聲和基于年齡、身高和體重的列線圖測(cè)量胸主動(dòng)脈降支血流,從而測(cè)量連續(xù)CO及容量反應(yīng)的動(dòng)態(tài)參數(shù)。TD克服了經(jīng)胸超聲心動(dòng)圖的許多局限性,可避免肋骨、肺對(duì)聲束的干擾,且食管緊鄰心臟和大血管,可以獲得高品質(zhì)圖像,對(duì)心功能和主動(dòng)脈血流狀態(tài)可進(jìn)行很好的監(jiān)測(cè)。雖然TD熟練操作需要時(shí)間,但其優(yōu)勢(shì)明顯,尤其對(duì)于心臟外科圍術(shù)期患者血流動(dòng)力學(xué)評(píng)估非常有價(jià)值,而且很少引起嚴(yán)重并發(fā)癥,操作過程因并發(fā)癥而被迫停止檢查的比例小于1%,致命性并發(fā)癥發(fā)生率更是低于萬分之一,檢查前必須除外食管及胃部疾病[22]。其應(yīng)用價(jià)值在于[23]:①可提供急性循環(huán)系統(tǒng)疾病的全面而重要的信息,是某些情況下確定休克原因的不可替代的手段;②對(duì)于經(jīng)胸心臟手術(shù)的患者,若高度懷疑心包填塞,其可快速、準(zhǔn)確地檢測(cè);③可快速、定性地評(píng)估血流動(dòng)力學(xué)異常的原因,明確治療方向;④可準(zhǔn)確評(píng)估容量狀態(tài)及預(yù)測(cè)液體反應(yīng)性,且特別適合心臟功能的準(zhǔn)確定量評(píng)估;⑤與有創(chuàng)血流動(dòng)力學(xué)監(jiān)測(cè)相比,TD損傷更小,感染風(fēng)險(xiǎn)更低,安全性更高;⑥對(duì)于俯臥位通氣的患者,是首選的血流動(dòng)力學(xué)監(jiān)測(cè)方法;因此,TD作為微創(chuàng)心功能監(jiān)測(cè)方法,可實(shí)時(shí)評(píng)估心臟的形態(tài)和功能,作為心臟外科圍術(shù)期心功能監(jiān)測(cè)的質(zhì)量標(biāo)準(zhǔn),值得推廣應(yīng)用。
3 無創(chuàng)監(jiān)測(cè)方法
3.1 Nexfin系統(tǒng)
Nexfin基于光電容積描記技術(shù)、生物反應(yīng)設(shè)備和部分氣體交換系統(tǒng),利用血管卸載原理,通過一個(gè)手指充氣袖套(連續(xù)血壓監(jiān)測(cè))與一種新型脈搏輪廓法結(jié)合,是一種無創(chuàng)監(jiān)測(cè)方法,能夠連續(xù)監(jiān)測(cè)血壓、SV、CO、SVV、SVR等,廣泛應(yīng)用于心臟重癥監(jiān)護(hù)室(Cardiac intensive care unit,CCU)、門診或急診[24]。Fischer等[25]對(duì)45例心臟手術(shù)患者分別應(yīng)用Nexfin和PiCCO監(jiān)測(cè)血流動(dòng)力學(xué),結(jié)果顯示,其測(cè)量結(jié)果與PiCCO相關(guān)性很差,主要表現(xiàn)在給予液體后,該方法不能很好地反映CI的快速變化,不能預(yù)測(cè)心臟術(shù)后液體反應(yīng)性。也有學(xué)者認(rèn)為,Nexfin設(shè)備安裝迅速,使用方便、簡(jiǎn)捷,對(duì)CO的測(cè)量是可靠地,可以在危重患者給予更準(zhǔn)確的有創(chuàng)監(jiān)測(cè)前使用,以防心功能突然惡化[26]。但缺點(diǎn)在于不適用微血管生理改變以及活動(dòng)的患者,這在一定程度上限制了在危重患者和清醒患者中使用。因此,應(yīng)根據(jù)患者病情的輕重緩急個(gè)體化地選擇合適的監(jiān)測(cè)方法。
3.2 無創(chuàng)超聲心排量監(jiān)測(cè)(Ultrasonic cardiac output monitoring,USCOM)
USCOM是一個(gè)便攜式的設(shè)備,通過應(yīng)用在胸骨上方的多普勒超聲探頭來測(cè)量CO,超聲探頭位于胸骨上切跡處,用于測(cè)量升主動(dòng)脈的血流速度,此系統(tǒng)中集成了一個(gè)算法來估計(jì)瓣膜的橫截面積,可以根據(jù)測(cè)量的主動(dòng)脈瓣或肺動(dòng)脈瓣的流速來計(jì)算CO[27]。USCOM可對(duì)重癥患者進(jìn)行便捷、快速、可靠地血流動(dòng)力學(xué)監(jiān)測(cè),可用于急診科、CCU和非心臟手術(shù)室,甚至在病房可以由一個(gè)訓(xùn)練有素的護(hù)理人員使用,Hodgson等[28]做了一項(xiàng)關(guān)于此方法學(xué)習(xí)曲線和測(cè)量可靠性的試驗(yàn),結(jié)果顯示在有經(jīng)驗(yàn)的操作員對(duì)志愿者進(jìn)行不到5 h的培訓(xùn)后,志愿者即可應(yīng)用此方法對(duì)急診住院患者進(jìn)行可靠、準(zhǔn)確地心功能評(píng)估。Meyer等[29]應(yīng)用此方法監(jiān)測(cè)心臟術(shù)后患者血流動(dòng)力學(xué),發(fā)現(xiàn)在測(cè)量CO、CI、SV參數(shù)時(shí)與PAC所獲得的參數(shù)有良好的相關(guān)性。張?jiān)频萚30]在USCOM與熱稀釋法監(jiān)測(cè)重癥患者心功能比較的Meta分析中顯示,USCOM監(jiān)測(cè)重癥患者心功能CO、CI指標(biāo)與熱稀釋法具有較好的一致性。因此,此方法是一種很有前景的監(jiān)測(cè)心臟手術(shù)圍手術(shù)期患者心功能的新型技術(shù)。
3.3 經(jīng)胸生物電阻抗(Thoracic electrical bioimpedance,TEB)
TEB原理是在胸腔中傳遞低振幅高頻電流,測(cè)量阻抗的感應(yīng)電極分別放置在上、下胸部,血流動(dòng)力學(xué)參數(shù)由TEB設(shè)備根據(jù)心電周期中胸廓電導(dǎo)率隨胸主動(dòng)脈血流變化的變化進(jìn)行測(cè)量。通過測(cè)量由動(dòng)脈搏動(dòng)血流產(chǎn)生的阻抗變化,及變化之間的時(shí)間間隔,可以計(jì)算出SV,是一種完全無創(chuàng)的連續(xù)心功能監(jiān)測(cè)方法[12]。其優(yōu)勢(shì)在于便捷、迅速且無創(chuàng),在床旁即可連續(xù)監(jiān)測(cè)心功能,應(yīng)用成本低,不存在感染風(fēng)險(xiǎn)及其他并發(fā)癥,但其信號(hào)質(zhì)量會(huì)受到患者運(yùn)動(dòng)、電干擾(如起搏器、手術(shù)中電刀)、心律失常和機(jī)械通氣等因素干擾,也會(huì)因患者的肥胖、胸腔積液、肺水腫、主動(dòng)脈瓣疾病、SVR顯著變化、主動(dòng)脈夾層等影響測(cè)量結(jié)果[31]。其監(jiān)測(cè)CO和SV的準(zhǔn)確性已在健康人群中得到很好的驗(yàn)證,但在臨床實(shí)際應(yīng)用中,其測(cè)量準(zhǔn)確性與“金標(biāo)準(zhǔn)”相關(guān)性較差,且不同設(shè)備之間的一致性存在較大差異。Faini等[32]應(yīng)用新一代TEB設(shè)備(Hotman System)與PAC進(jìn)行對(duì)比,在51例心臟重癥患者進(jìn)行連續(xù)測(cè)量CI,結(jié)果顯示兩者測(cè)量結(jié)果有較好的相關(guān)性。隨著數(shù)字信號(hào)處理和新算法的發(fā)展,此方法測(cè)量的準(zhǔn)確性必然會(huì)得到提升,是一種非常有應(yīng)用前景的新技術(shù)。
綜上所述,在心臟手術(shù)圍術(shù)期心功能監(jiān)測(cè)非常重要。隨著醫(yī)療技術(shù)的不斷發(fā)展及監(jiān)測(cè)設(shè)備的技術(shù)更新,有創(chuàng)、微創(chuàng)、無創(chuàng)的監(jiān)測(cè)方法將用于更明確和更具體的患者群體。目前心功能監(jiān)測(cè)方法在不斷趨向于無創(chuàng)化、實(shí)時(shí)化、精確化發(fā)展,相信未來一定會(huì)出現(xiàn)一種理想化的監(jiān)測(cè)方法,在各種情況下都能無創(chuàng)并動(dòng)態(tài)及時(shí)精準(zhǔn)監(jiān)測(cè)血流動(dòng)力學(xué)。作為臨床醫(yī)生,有必要熟悉并掌握目前所有的心功能監(jiān)測(cè)方法,了解其缺陷及優(yōu)勢(shì)并靈活應(yīng)用,加強(qiáng)心臟手術(shù)圍術(shù)期血流動(dòng)力學(xué)監(jiān)測(cè)和調(diào)控,提高臨床應(yīng)用能力。
[參考文獻(xiàn)]
[1] Sander D,Dusse F.Leitlinien in der praxis:Der herzchirurgische patient in der intensivmedizinischen versorgung,S3-guideline intensive care therapy of cardiac surgery patients-A practical approach[J].Anasthesiol Intensivmed Notfallmed Schmerzther,2020,55(10):635-642.
[2] Saugel B,Thiele RH,Hapfelmeier A,et al. Technological assessment and objective evaluation of minimally invasive and noninvasive cardiac output monitoring systems[J].Anesthesiology,2020,133(4):921-928.
[3] Lee M,Curley GF,Mustard M,et al.The swan-ganz catheter remains a critically important component of monitoring in cardiovascular critical care[J].Can J Cardiol,2017,33(1):142-147.
[4] Joseph C,Garrubba M,Smith JA,et al. Does the use of a pulmonary artery catheter make a difference during or after cardiac surgery?[J].Heart Lung Circ,2018,27(8):952-960.
[5] Thurman P. Mixed shock states:A case for the pulmonary artery catheter[J].AACN Adv Crit Care,2020,31(1):67-74.
[6] Beurton A,Teboul JL,Monnet X. Transpulmonary thermodilution techniques in the haemodynamically unstable patient[J]. Curr Opin Crit Care,2019,25(3):273-279.
[7] 劉大為.實(shí)用重癥醫(yī)學(xué)[M].2版.北京:人民衛(wèi)生出版社,2017:89.
[8] Pour-Ghaz I,Manolukas T,F(xiàn)oray N,et al. Accuracy of non-invasive and minimally invasive hemodynamic monitoring:Where do we stand?[J].Ann Transl Med,2019,7(17):421.
[9] 郎利,傅潤(rùn)喬,張鳳英.脈波指示連續(xù)心排量監(jiān)測(cè)技術(shù)在老年患者不停跳冠狀動(dòng)脈旁路移植術(shù)中血流動(dòng)力學(xué)監(jiān)測(cè)的應(yīng)用[J]. 解放軍醫(yī)學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào),2013,34(8):845-847.
[10] 潘傳亮,劉劍萍,胡星. 基于PiCCO變量的目標(biāo)導(dǎo)向集束化治療對(duì)體外循環(huán)心臟術(shù)后患者AKI的防治作用:一項(xiàng)前瞻性觀察性研究[J]. 中華危重病急救醫(yī)學(xué),2019, (6):731-736.
[11] Lorne E,Diouf M,de Wilde RBP,et al. Assessment of interchangeability rate between 2 methods of measurements:An example with a cardiac output comparison study[J].Medicine (Baltimore),2018,97(7):e9905.
[12] Geisen M,Ganter MT,Hartnack S,et al. Accuracy,precision,and trending of 4 pulse wave analysis techniques in the postoperative period[J].J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth,2018,32(2):715-722.
[13] Asamoto M,Orii R,Otsuji M,et al. Reliability of cardiac output measurements using LiDCO rapid and FloTrac/Vigileo across broad ranges of cardiac output values[J].J Clin Monit Comput,2017,31(4):709-716.
[14] Maeda T,Hamaguchi E,Kubo N,et al. The accuracy and trending ability of cardiac index measured by the fourth-generation FloTrac/Vigileo system and the Fick method in cardiac surgery patients[J].J Clin Monit Comput,2019, 33(5):767-776.
[15] Kusaka Y,Ohchi F,Minami T. Evaluation of the fourth-generation floTrac/vigileo system in comparison with the intermittent bolus thermodilution method in patients undergoing cardiac surgery[J].J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth,2019,33(4):953-960.
[16] Maeda T,Hattori K,Sumiyoshi M,et al. Accuracy and trending ability of the fourth-generation FloTrac/Vigileo System in patients undergoing abdominal aortic aneurysm surgery[J].J Anesth,2018,32(3):387-393.
[17] Grensemann J,Defosse JM,Willms M,et al. Validation of radial artery-based uncalibrated pulse contour method (PulsioFlex) in critically ill patients:A observational study[J].Eur J Anaesthesiol, 2017,34(11):723-731.
[18] Salzwedel C,Puig J,Carstens A,et al. Perioperative goal-directed hemodynamic therapy based on radial arterial pulse pressure variation and continuous cardiac index trending reduces postoperative complications after major abdominal surgery:A multi-center, prospective, randomized study[J].Crit Care, 2013,17(5):R191.
[19] Weil G,Motamed C,Eghiaian A,et al. Comparison of Proaqt/Pulsioflex and oesophageal Doppler for intraoperative haemodynamic monitoring during intermediate-risk abdominal surgery[J].Anaesth Crit Care Pain Med,2019, 38(2):153-159.
[20] Biais M,Mazocky E,Stecken L,et al.Impact of systemic vascular resistance on the accuracy of the pulsioflex device[J]. Anesth Analg,2017,124(2):487-493.
[21] Smetkin AA,Hussain A,Kuzkov VV,et al. Validation of cardiac output monitoring based on uncalibrated pulse contour analysis vs transpulmonary thermodilution during off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting[J].Br J Anaesth,2014,112(6):1024-1031.
[22] 王小亭,尹萬紅,李易,等.發(fā)展重癥經(jīng)食管心臟超聲 完善重癥超聲體系[J].中華內(nèi)科雜志,2019(12):865-868.
[23] 尹萬紅,王小亭,劉大為,等.中國(guó)重癥經(jīng)食管超聲臨床應(yīng)用專家共識(shí)(2019)[J].中華內(nèi)科雜志,2019(12):869-882.
[24] Ramsingh D,Ma M,Kim JK,et al. Feasibility evaluation of non-invasive cardiac function technology during echocardiography-based cardiac stress testing[J].J Clin Monit Comput,2020,34(4):655-661.
[25] Fischer MO,Coucoravas J,Truong J,et al. Assessment of changes in cardiac index and fluid responsiveness:A comparison of Nexfin and transpulmonary thermodilution[J].Acta Anaesthesiol Scand,2013,57(6):704-712.
[26] Aritürk C,A?觭il M,Ulug?觟l H,et al. Is the Nexfin finger cuff method for cardiac output measurement reliableduring coronary artery bypass grafting? A prospective comparison with the echocardiography and FloTrac/Vigileo methods[J].Turk J Med Sci,2016,46(2):291-295.
[27] Gregory SD,Cooney H,Diab S,et al. In vitro evaluation of an ultrasonic cardiac output monitoring (USCOM) device[J].J Clin Monit Comput,2016,30(1):69-75.
[28] Hodgson LE,Venn R,F(xiàn)orni LG, et al. Measuring the cardiac output in acute emergency admissions: Use of the non-invasive ultrasonic cardiac output monitor (USCOM) with determination of the learning curve and inter-rater reliability[J].J Intensive Care Soc,2016,17(2):122-128.
[29] Meyer S,Todd D,Wright I,et al. Review article:Non-invasive assessment of cardiac output with portable continuous-Wave Doppler ultrasound[J].Emerg Med Australas,2008,20(3):201-208.
[30] 張?jiān)疲蹒?,季冬東,等. USCOM與熱稀釋法監(jiān)測(cè)重癥患者心功能比較的Meta分析[J]. 中華危重病急救醫(yī)學(xué),2019,(12):1462-1468.
[31] Saugel B,Cecconi M,Hajjar LA.Noninvasive cardiac output monitoring in cardiothoracic surgery patients:Available methods and future directions[J].J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth,2019,33(6):1742-1752.
[32] Faini A,Omboni S,Tifrea M,et al. Cardiac index assessment:Validation of a new non-invasive very low current thoracic bioimpedance device by thermodilution[J].Blood Press,2014,23(2):102-108.
(收稿日期:2020-11-09)