• <tr id="yyy80"></tr>
  • <sup id="yyy80"></sup>
  • <tfoot id="yyy80"><noscript id="yyy80"></noscript></tfoot>
  • 99热精品在线国产_美女午夜性视频免费_国产精品国产高清国产av_av欧美777_自拍偷自拍亚洲精品老妇_亚洲熟女精品中文字幕_www日本黄色视频网_国产精品野战在线观看 ?

    Role of temporary portosystemic surgical shunt during liver resection to prevent a post-resection small for size-like syndrome

    2024-05-13 07:41:40JacopoLanariMarinaPolaccoUmbertoCillo
    Hepatoma Research 2024年3期

    Jacopo Lanari, Marina Polacco, Umberto Cillo

    Department of Surgical, Oncological and Gastroenterological Sciences, General Surgery 2 Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgery and Liver Transplantation Unit, Padua University Hospital, Padua 35128, Italy.

    Abstract Liver resection stands as the gold-standard therapeutic approach for selected cases of hepatocellular carcinoma(HCC).The extent of resectable parenchyma hinges upon the underlying liver function and its regenerative potential.Consequently, cirrhosis may impede access to potentially curative interventions for HCC arising within this context.Cirrhotic patients undergoing liver resection face heightened susceptibility to post-hepatectomy liver failure (PHLF).The clinical profile of PHLF bears a resemblance to a well-documented syndrome within the liver transplant (LT) domain: Small-for-size syndrome (SFSS), a form of graft failure observed in the postoperative phase following LT with undersized or partial organs.Management of SFSS targets mitigating the overflow syndrome, achievable through diverse portal diversion techniques.Portal vein flow diversion encompasses procedures redirecting a variable proportion of portal vein flow towards systemic circulation.Consequently,derivative procedures aim to directly alleviate portal hypertension.Side-to-side portocaval shunts emerge as the most straightforward and efficacious means of decompressing the portal system.Furthermore, they afford flow calibration to diminish the incidence and severity of steal syndrome and hepatic encephalopathy, without compromising efficacy or hepatic function.Translating insights gleaned from LT complexities involving SFSS to liver resection, strategies involving portal flow diversion warrant consideration in efforts to forestall PHLF.This approach aims to extend the frontiers of liver surgery, broadening access to hepatectomy with curative intent, either as a standalone intervention or as part of a comprehensive treatment regimen where LT serves as a secondary option.

    Keywords: Portosystemic shunts, liver resection, cirrhosis, post-hepatectomy liver failure, small-for-size

    INTRODUCTION

    Liver resection stands as the benchmark treatment for carefully chosen cases of hepatocellular carcinoma(HCC), contingent upon the disease stage and liver function[1,2].Surgeons prioritize considerations of tumor burden and the quality of liver tissue when strategizing hepatectomy.The volume of resectable parenchyma depends on underlying liver function and its regenerative capacity; hence, cirrhosis can limit access to potentially curative treatments of HCC arising in this context.Cirrhotic individuals undergoing liver resection face heightened susceptibility to post-hepatectomy liver failure (PHLF), wherein the future liver remnant (FLR) fails to meet the patient's metabolic demands.PHLF manifests through progressive organ dysfunction, accentuated by metabolite accumulation (bilirubin, ammonia,etc.) and complications such as ascites, hemorrhage attributable to diminished coagulation factor synthesis, septic infections, and renal impairment.The rapid progression from liver failure to multi-organ failure underscores the urgency in managing this condition to avert patient mortality[3].

    Pathophysiology of post-hepatectomy liver failure

    Cumulating evidence supports the hypothesis that the functional failure of the remnant liver after hepatectomy may be caused by alterations in the hepatic microvascular bed[4-8].A critical factor in this process is the wedge pressure at the sinusoidal level.In cirrhotic livers, the control mechanisms of sinusoidal flow are compromised.Relative portal hyperperfusion, characteristic of cirrhosis and exacerbated by reduced vascular bed post-hepatectomy, leads to microcirculatory trauma and subsequent inhibition of organ functions.Experimental studies indicate that while some degree of portal hyperperfusion stimulates hepatic regeneration, excessive increases may cause hepatocellular damage[9,10].

    Intrahepatic flow and its composition, particularly the proportion of venous and arterial blood, are vital for organ homeostasis[11-14].The Hepatic Arterial Buffer Response (HABR) plays a key role in maintaining hepatic blood flow stability.The physiological basis of HABR involves adenosine clearance, a potent vasodilator, predominantly for the hepatic artery[15].Decreased portal flow increases intrahepatic adenosine concentration, stimulating hepatic arterial flow to maintain overall organ blood flow[12].

    Conversely, increased portal flow post-hepatectomy reduces arterial supply[16], potentially impacting bile duct perfusion.Research using techniques like portal vein ligation in animal models reveals that substantial portal stenosis triggers HABR[11].

    The increase in portal flow resulting from parenchyma removal causes an important decrease in the arterial supply to the organ; the consequences of this alteration lead to relative ischemia of the biliary tree and a decrease in the regenerative capacity of the liver.Microscopic changes include endothelial and sinusoidal alterations, hepatocyte degeneration, mitochondrial swelling, thrombotic events in small portal branches,occasional recanalization, regenerative hyperplasia, and biliary stenosis in later stages[11,17,18].

    Limits of current strategies to increase FLR in cirrhotic patients

    Understanding the significance of a small future liver remnant (FRL) and its impact on the feasibility of curative liver tumor resection has been pivotal.Strategies to increase so-calledfunctional resectabilityhave been investigated over the last 15 years[19].Portal vein embolization (PVE) or ligation (PVL) stands out as a significant advancement, enabling preoperative modulation of liver volume.The evolution of this concept has led to two-stage hepatectomy (TSH) and, more recently, associated liver partition and portal vein ligation for staged hepatectomy (ALPPS).These techniques have facilitated extensive hepatectomy, even for multiple or large HCCs, by augmenting the FLR[20,21].However, the efficacy of liver volume modulation varies across different liver malignancies and is contingent upon liver parenchyma quality.TSH is hampered by an incompletion rate of over 30%, attributed to ineffective liver hypertrophy and potential tumor growth stimulation[22,23].ALPPS initially promised nearly 100% resection rates for otherwise functionally irresectable tumors[24,25], but enthusiasm waned due to high morbidity and mortality rates,particularly in HCC patients[26,27].The exact underlying causes remain elusive; however, the prolonged manipulation and permanence of the tumor for several days after the first-stage operation, coupled with a surge in cytokines and growth factors postoperatively, have been implicated in inter-stage tumor progression[26,28].Moreover, FLR hypertrophy in fibrotic/cirrhotic livers appears suboptimal compared to noncirrhotic counterparts[29].This concept is also reinforced by the evidence that the outcomes improved from the early phase, in which ALPSS was carried out in HCC patients regardless of the degree of underlying cirrhosis or concomitant portal hypertension[30], compared to the current era, when more stringent criteria are applied[31,32].Consequently, advanced cirrhosis and portal hypertension emerge as limiting factors for liver volume modulation techniques.

    Similarities between post-hepatectomy liver failure and small-for-size syndrome

    The clinical features of post-hepatectomy liver failure (PHLF) bear a resemblance to a well-recognized syndrome in liver transplant (LT) practice: the Small-For-Size Syndrome (SFSS).SFSS denotes early graft failure following LT with undersized or partial organs[17,18].Optimal graft-recipient size matching is crucial for LT success, with inadequate grafts typically characterized by a graft-recipient weight ratio of less than 0.8% (GRWR < 0.8%) or a graft-native liver weight ratio of less than 40%[33-36].Undersized grafts fail to meet postoperative metabolic demands, resulting in organ dysfunction marked by hyperbilirubinemia,coagulopathy, and refractory ascites.Sepsis often complicates SFSS, leading to alarmingly high mortality rates[36].While the etiology of SFSS is multifactorial, both graft and recipient factors contribute.Persistent elevated perfusion pressures and portal hypertension post-revascularization are implicated in SFSS-related organ injury, underscoring the complex interplay between graft and recipient factors in the development of this syndrome[37].

    Mechanisms involved in the development of small-for-size syndrome

    There is an agreement in attributing the cause of this syndrome to portal hyper-inflow[18], manifesting through various mechanisms:

    ● Shear Stress: Elevated portal pressure in the reduced-size liver induces mechanical trauma at the endothelial level, leading to extensive sinusoidal damage, endothelial cell destruction, and microhemorrhages at portal triads[36].

    ● Relative Decrease in Arterial Blood Supply: Compared to portal flow, reduced arterial blood supply compromises hepatocyte regeneration, hindering metabolic support crucial for regeneration[38,39].

    Itoet al.demonstrated a significant incidence of SFSS in living donor liver transplantation (LDLT),particularly with left lobe partial grafts, correlating with portal pressure[40].Portal vein pressure exceeding 20 mmHg post-LDLT predicts high morbidity and poor graft functional recovery.

    Small for size syndrome treatment

    Glanemannet al.conducted experiments demonstrating that diverting portal flow significantly enhances outcomes in animal models undergoing 90% liver parenchymal resection[4].Rats subjected to hepatectomy with splenectomy exhibited minimal hepatocyte damage, evidenced by transaminase levels at least three times lower than controls.This improvement was attributed to reduced portal hyperflow post-surgery,evident just 15 min after the procedure, with rates notably lower in the study group (3.5 ± 0.4 mL/min)compared to controls (5.4 ± 0.4 mL/min).Portal diversion also enhances hepatic artery blood flow via HABR activation, arterializing liver-directed blood flow[4].Treatment of SFSS aims to reduce the portal overflow that is characteristic of this syndrome, which is achievable through various portal diversion methods.

    DEFINITION OF PORTAL VEIN FLOW DIVERSION AND TYPES OF PROCEDURES

    Portal vein flow diversion encompasses procedures aimed at redirecting a variable portion of portal vein flow towards systemic circulation, directly targeting portal hypertension.These procedures include:

    ● Ligation or embolization of the splenic artery[41,42]

    ● Splenectomy[36]

    ● Preemptive portal branch ligation or embolization before hepatectomy, promoting compensatory hypertrophy and enhancing potential functional reserve[43]

    ● Porto-Systemic Shunts (PSS): including portocaval and splenorenal shunts[44-46]

    The primary objectives of these interventions are twofold.Firstly, to diminish portal inflow by splenic artery embolization or ligation, addressing the significant yet fluctuating splenic component of portal hypertension.This approach has proven effective in managing esophageal variceal bleeding and small-forsize syndrome (SFSS), with reported post-surgical reductions in splenic flow of up to 52%[47,48].

    Alternatively, diversion of portal blood flow can be achieved through PSS.

    Both surgical and radiological portosystemic shunt procedures create a circuit allowing portal blood to bypass the liver, reducing both flow and portal pressure.

    Transjugular Intrahepatic Portosystemic Stent Shunt (TIPSS) involves connecting an intrahepatic portal branch to a hepatic vein via a conduit, positioned percutaneously using interventional radiology.Advancements in this radiological method, particularly using covered stents, have improved outcomes in TIPSS patients, reducing interest in surgical shunts[49].However, TIPSS may lead to hepatic encephalopathy and hinder future liver interventions due to the intrahepatic conduit.While indicated for cirrhotic patients with recurrent variceal bleeding and refractory ascites, TIPSS is contraindicated in those with HCC.Thus, it is not suitable for managing portal hypertension during HCC hepatectomy[50].

    Surgical portosystemic shunts

    The portocaval anastomosis, known as the Eck fistula, first described by T.E.Starzl in 1983[51], rapidly decompresses the portal system and achieves immediate decompression of the portal vein vascular bed[44-48].Subsequently, various types of portosystemic shunts (PSS) have been described.These include connections between portal vein and caval systems through anastomoses between tributary vessels, with or without interposition of human iliac grafts from deceased donors or synthetic vascular prostheses made of Dacron or Goretex?-PTFE (Polytetrafluoroethylene).

    Common surgical portosystemic shunts include:

    ● End-to-side portocaval shunts

    ● Mesenteric-caval shunts (with prosthesis interposition)

    ● Proximal (Linton procedure), central (Cooley procedure), and distal (Warren procedure) splenorenal shunts

    ● Speno-caval shunt (Orozco procedure)

    ● Side-to-side portocaval shunts, with or without interposition graft/prosthesis (H-graft portocaval shunt)These procedures alter portal hemodynamics, reducing portocaval pressure gradients, but may cause varying degrees of portal flow inversion, depending on shunt type and dimension.

    End-to-side shunts result in total portosystemic shunting with no remaining hepatopetal flow.It is associated with the development of refractory ascites in 5% of cases.The bleeding from rupture of esophageal varices is reduced to 5% after such interventions, but the rates of hepatic encephalopathy (which can reach 40%) and impaired liver and heart function (with possible development of high-flow heart failure)are quite high.Nowadays, it is almost abandoned, and it is only used in emergency settings due to its easy technical feasibility[52,53].

    Mesenteric-caval and central splenorenal shunts, although effective, are considered secondary choices due to anastomoses on smaller, thrombosis-prone vessels.These procedures are preferred in the setting of portal hypertension due to portal vein thrombosis in non-cirrhotic patients[54-56]; in this setting, especially in pediatric extrahepatic portal vein occlusion, a modified mesenteric-caval shunt, named Meso-Rex Shunt,can be applied[57].

    Warren procedure selectively targets esophageal varices, leaving portal flow largely unaffected[56,58-60].

    Side-to-side portocaval shunts, whether H-shaped with graft/prosthesis interposition or not, are favored for their simplicity and efficacy in decompressing the portal system.These shunts offer flow calibration to reduce steal syndrome[61-63], and hepatic encephalopathy risk without compromising effectiveness or liver function.The H-graft interposition shunt preserves hepatopetal flow by approximately 80% with low encephalopathy rates (about 5%), and 5% rebleeding from gastroesophageal varices, with shunt patency of about 95% over 7 years[56,58,64,65].Figure 1 provides a comparative overview of outcomes for the main portosystemic shunting techniques.

    APPLYING THE PORTOSYSTEMIC SURGICAL SHUNT TO LIVER RESECTION

    In cirrhotic patients with HCC, treatment strategy hinges on a delicate balance between tumor-related and cirrhosis-related factors, profoundly impacting patient prognosis[1].Essentially, the severity of cirrhosis diminishes the significance of HCC for long-term survival, prioritizing tumor control over disease clearance.Additionally, cirrhosis poses constraints on surgical options, heightening susceptibility to postprocedural or drug-induced liver failure.The barcelona clinic liver cancer (BCLC) staging system[66]initially developed and validated for HCC management, has become somewhat static over time, particularly inadequate for intermediate and advanced stages and decompensated cirrhotic patients due to evolving medical management and tumor biology understanding[67,68].Increasing evidence demonstrates differences between BCLC recommendations and real-life approaches in HCC treatment[69,70].In response to the limitations of the BCLC system, alternative staging concepts and treatment stage migration strategies have emerged, but these still focus on stage-oriented HCC treatment strategies[71].

    Figure 1.Visual comparison of various portosystemic shunt techniques alongside their primary pathophysiological consequences.

    A novel patient-oriented approach, termed “therapeutic hierarchy,” prioritizes treatment feasibility assessment to determine the optimal therapy for each patient at each stage[72,73].

    Clinically significant portal hypertension (CSPH), often indicated by imaging findings of splenomegaly,varices, ascites, or a platelet count < 100,000/mL[74], marks decompensated cirrhosis and has historically contraindicated hepatic resections.However, cirrhotic patients with CSPH and HCC within Milan criteria[75]or extended validated criteria[76-79]stand to benefit most from liver transplantation (LT)[72,80].If contraindications to LT arise, these patients, excluded from potentially curative treatments, often receive loco-regional therapy (LRT) or best supportive care (BSC), both yielding dismal prognoses.Despite longstanding contraindications, many tertiary hepatobiliary centers have successfully performed hepatectomy in cirrhotic patients with portal hypertension, reporting acceptable mortality rates, favorable long-term outcomes, and oncologic benefits[81-84].Portal hypertension is not prognostic for perioperative mortality or long-term survival, according to multivariable analyses[83].Moreover, updated guidelines from the European association for the study of the liver (EASL)[1]endorse liver resection in the presence of portal hypertension for patients at low risk of liver decompensation post-surgery[85].

    Drawing lessons from LT complicated by SFSS, portal flow diversion strategies, such as portosystemic shunts, may prevent PHLF and expand the boundaries of liver surgery, increasing the number of those who can access hepatectomy with curative intent[86]or as a part of a wider treatment strategy that considers LT a second-line treatment.These shunts reduce sinusoidal wedge pressure post-hepatectomy, potentially preserving residual organ function and enhancing regenerative capacity while minimizing intra- and postoperative morbidity, including bleeding and ascites-major components of PHLF.Intraoperative bleeding, coagulopathy, and new onset ascites are indeed some of the major challenges cirrhotic patients face when undergoing surgery, and the mortality rates have been described as high as 10%-57%[87].Portosystemic shunts have proven safe and effective in facilitating major abdominal surgery in cirrhotic patients.In the first pioneering experiences, it has been noted that patients with previous portocaval shunt performed better following non-hepatic surgery as compared to those without[88,89].In the era of expandedpolytetrafluoroethylene (e-PTFE) covered stents, TIPSS occlusion rates dropped markedly, as well as the incidence of post-procedural hepatic encephalopathy when smaller stents were applied[90-92].These results pushed surgeons to explore non-standard TIPSS applications more.Nowadays, both surgical shunt and TIPSS have been shown to increase the resection rate of gastrointestinal tumors in cirrhotic patients without increasing complication rates, and with less incidence of decompensated ascites after surgery[93-97].In particular, TIPSS followed by surgery after a 30-day interval showed good portal hypertension control, 100%planned surgery completion rate, ascites and encephalopathy both in 12.5% of cases, and 80% overall survival at 1 year[98].However, the TIPSS procedure is difficult to reverse in case of inefficacy or complications[90,92], with poor cost-effectiveness in this scenario[99].Notably, the first case of liver resection for HCC in a patient who had previously placed a TIPSS for decompensated cirrhosis was recently published, and an uneventful postoperative course was reported[100].Nonetheless, TIPSS has several contraindications related to high peri-procedural bleeding and cancer dissemination risk, particularly in HCC patients.Conversely, surgical shunts afford full control of the operating site, minimizing risks.In other words, when TIPSS is contraindicated, surgical portosystemic shunts are still an option.

    Expanding liver resection to patients with CSPH serves as both a downstaging strategy before LT and the best alternative for those ineligible for LT, potentially enhancing overall survival in this population[2,72].

    Technical aspects of liver resection with portocaval shunt

    In liver surgery in general, but even more so in HCC, it is necessary to consider the extent of hepatic resection (minor resection versus major resection) based on the number of liver segments to be removed.It is now clear that preoperative assessment of hepatic resection safety relies on FRL volume and liver function, but safety limits for hepatic resection remain a debated issue in the literature.In the scenario we have described, and based on previous evidence, we suggest performing a surgical shunt when hepatic resection in a cirrhotic patient exceeds 40% of the total liver volume (FRL < 60%)[101].

    A different issue concerns the theme of anatomical resections compared to non-anatomical resections.The evidence available so far suggests that non-anatomical hepatic resection can lead to an ischemic area in the residual part of the adjacent liver with a higher amount of debris from the resection edge; this increases the risk of infectious complications in the postoperative course[102].The cirrhotic patient with portal hypertension is more exposed and susceptible to infectious events, so it is useful to minimize this risk in every phase, including the surgical procedure.Since anatomical resection is associated with less debris from the resection site, we recommend this type of procedure when deciding to perform a surgical portosystemic shunt.

    One potential drawback of expanding the HCC resection pool through liver resection preceded by a surgical portocaval shunting is the requirement for an open abdomen procedure.However, minimally invasive approaches for HCC resection in cirrhotic patients have shown a more favorable outcome, with lower rates of blood transfusion and complications compared to open surgery[103,104].Nevertheless, in highly selected cases where clinically significant portal hypertension (CSPH) limits access to liver resection as a potentially curative treatment or as part of a downstaging protocol, performing a calibrated portocaval shunt before liver resection has been described[86].Our group has demonstrated the safety and effectiveness of this technique in selected cases, as evidenced by our case series results [Table 1] [Figure 2].Remarkably, a patient underwent LT four years after liver resection and remains free of HCC recurrence, even eight years post-surgery (four years post-LT).

    Table 1.Case series of 15 liver resections for HCC on cirrhosis with portocaval shunt during surgery.Demographic characteristics,disease burden, type of surgery, and postoperative outcomes.(Unpublished data, Author’s personal experience)

    Figure 2.Kaplan-Meier survival curves of 15 HCC patients who underwent liver resection with H-graft portocaval shunt.Overall survival rates at 1, 2, and 3 years were 84.8%, 67.9%, and 33.9%, respectively (unpublished data, Author’s personal experience).

    Surgical technique

    H-graft portocaval shunt

    Figure 3.During surgery in a patient from the authors' series, an intraoperative photograph depicts the H-graft portocaval shunt constructed using a free iliac vein graft.(PV portal vein, PCS portocaval shunt, IVC inferior vena cava).

    Surgical exposure is achieved by a transverse upper abdominal or reverse “L” incision.Retrograde cholecystectomy is performed, and the hepatoduodenal ligament is approached.Dissection of the retroportal lymph nodes is carried out to expose the portal vein and common bile duct.Careful dissection is carried out to allow for medial retraction of the common bile duct, and the right hepatic artery, in case of aberrant anatomy of the latter.The axis of the portocaval shunt and the portal vein should be parallel for the technical success of the shunt.Hence, an oblique incision should be made on the inferior vena cava (IVC).Caudate lobectomy or transection of the caudate process might be required to expose a sufficient length of the IVC and to achieve the desirable orientation, which, along with sufficient mobility of the portal vein,assures a tension-free anastomosis.For H-type shunts, we opt for a 0.6 cm diameter Goretex? vascular prosthesis; eventually, free iliac cadaveric vein graft of compatible blood group.In the latter scenario, the cadaveric vein graft is surgically calibrated to 6 mm [Figure 3].The portocaval shunt is carried with partially occluding vascular clamps (Satinsky) and 6-0 running Prolene suture.Intraoperative Doppler ultrasound is carried out at the completion of the shunt to check the portal, arterial, and shunt flows.If necessary,invasive measurement of portal pressure is carried out (with the use of a 25-G needle attached to a water pressure gauge with saline).

    Pathophysiological consequences of the surgical portacaval shunt

    The surgical portocaval shunt presents certain pathophysiological consequences owing to its efficacy and rapid hemodynamic alterations.Competition for portal flow between the remnant liver and the shunt may lead to organ failure due to hypoperfusion[105].This diversion of blood flow into the systemic circulation reduces pressure both at the sinusoidal level and in the portal vein, as well as within the collateral circulation.However, a surgical portosystemic shunt utilized in liver resection may be functionally temporary.As the future liver remnant (FLR) regenerates, the sinusoidal vascular bed re-establishes,potentially leading to spontaneous late thrombosis of the shunt when no longer required.Nevertheless,these benefits may be accompanied by complications such as transient exacerbation of liver function and hepatic encephalopathy, with side-to-side portacaval shunts more prone to such issues compared to H-graft shunts[45,106].Consequently, the H-graft shunt is the Authors’ procedure of choice.

    In cases of persistent encephalopathy unresponsive to medical treatment, closure of the surgical shunt may be considered once liver regeneration is complete[45,105].

    CONCLUSIONS

    Portal flow diversion and surgical portosystemic shunts in patients with CSPH present an intriguing avenue for expanding the indications for liver resection in select HCC patients once deemed unresectable due to portal hypertension-associated risks of postoperative liver failure.Advanced liver cirrhosis and portal hypertension should not be viewed as absolute contraindications for liver resection.Instead, they warrant individual evaluation for each patient, weighing the survival benefits offered by available treatment options on a case-by-case basis.This evaluation process should occur within a multidisciplinary framework to ensure comprehensive and tailored management strategies.

    DECLARATIONS

    Authors’ Contributions

    Performed the literature research and wrote the paper: Lanari J, Polacco M Designed the paper and reviewed the final draft: Cillo U

    Availability of data and materials

    Author data are only available upon appropriate and reasoned request.

    Financial support and sponsorship

    None.

    Conflicts of interest

    All authors declared that there are no conflicts of interest.

    Ethical approval and consent to participate

    Patients’ data were handled in accordance with the ethical guidelines of the 2013 revised Declaration of Helsinki.Each patient signed a consent for every procedure performed in the hospital, and for the collection and use of data anonymously for research and publication purposes, and all procedures were performed in accordance with the Declaration of Istanbul.No one received compensation or was offered any incentive.

    Consent for publication

    All patients sign an informed consent at the presentation in which they agree to collect and use their personal data anonymously for research purposes.

    Copyright

    ? The Author(s) 2024.

    亚洲综合精品二区| h视频一区二区三区| 国产在线一区二区三区精| 国产一区有黄有色的免费视频| 如何舔出高潮| 欧美亚洲日本最大视频资源| 99热这里只有精品一区| 久久精品国产亚洲av天美| 亚洲图色成人| 久久精品国产a三级三级三级| 丝袜在线中文字幕| 内地一区二区视频在线| 精品人妻一区二区三区麻豆| 精品亚洲成a人片在线观看| 久久婷婷青草| 少妇被粗大的猛进出69影院 | 亚洲精品国产色婷婷电影| 黑人猛操日本美女一级片| 伦理电影免费视频| 成人18禁高潮啪啪吃奶动态图 | 国产乱来视频区| 晚上一个人看的免费电影| 欧美3d第一页| 亚洲av在线观看美女高潮| 日韩视频在线欧美| 久久精品熟女亚洲av麻豆精品| 99热这里只有精品一区| 午夜精品国产一区二区电影| 亚洲精品国产av蜜桃| 精品亚洲乱码少妇综合久久| 精品久久久噜噜| 欧美变态另类bdsm刘玥| 热99久久久久精品小说推荐| 十八禁网站网址无遮挡| 成人亚洲欧美一区二区av| 高清午夜精品一区二区三区| 你懂的网址亚洲精品在线观看| 夫妻性生交免费视频一级片| videosex国产| 高清午夜精品一区二区三区| 日韩av在线免费看完整版不卡| 母亲3免费完整高清在线观看 | 99视频精品全部免费 在线| 国产有黄有色有爽视频| 母亲3免费完整高清在线观看 | 一区二区三区乱码不卡18| 亚洲国产色片| 亚洲精品成人av观看孕妇| 久久久久久久国产电影| 亚洲av成人精品一区久久| 高清视频免费观看一区二区| 精品人妻熟女毛片av久久网站| 国产乱人偷精品视频| 精品人妻在线不人妻| 精品人妻熟女毛片av久久网站| 看免费成人av毛片| 成人亚洲欧美一区二区av| 亚洲av日韩在线播放| 亚洲精品自拍成人| 3wmmmm亚洲av在线观看| 我的女老师完整版在线观看| 中文精品一卡2卡3卡4更新| 久久午夜综合久久蜜桃| 日日摸夜夜添夜夜爱| 午夜91福利影院| a 毛片基地| 99热这里只有精品一区| av专区在线播放| 尾随美女入室| 久久国产精品大桥未久av| 寂寞人妻少妇视频99o| av播播在线观看一区| 极品人妻少妇av视频| 欧美少妇被猛烈插入视频| 丝袜美足系列| 成年人午夜在线观看视频| 97精品久久久久久久久久精品| 日韩 亚洲 欧美在线| 飞空精品影院首页| 日本欧美视频一区| 看免费成人av毛片| 欧美精品人与动牲交sv欧美| 亚洲精品日韩av片在线观看| xxx大片免费视频| 欧美日韩视频高清一区二区三区二| 国产黄片视频在线免费观看| a级毛片黄视频| 在线观看www视频免费| 久久久久久久亚洲中文字幕| 亚洲国产日韩一区二区| 三级国产精品欧美在线观看| 免费播放大片免费观看视频在线观看| 最新中文字幕久久久久| 色婷婷av一区二区三区视频| 亚洲情色 制服丝袜| 国产在视频线精品| 亚洲不卡免费看| 蜜桃在线观看..| 老司机影院毛片| 成人黄色视频免费在线看| 777米奇影视久久| 久久99热这里只频精品6学生| 丰满少妇做爰视频| 日韩一区二区三区影片| 国产一区有黄有色的免费视频| 国产毛片在线视频| 永久免费av网站大全| 我的女老师完整版在线观看| 免费大片18禁| 在线 av 中文字幕| 国产在线一区二区三区精| 成人午夜精彩视频在线观看| 国产男女超爽视频在线观看| 91aial.com中文字幕在线观看| 日韩精品有码人妻一区| 桃花免费在线播放| 国产日韩一区二区三区精品不卡 | 亚洲av不卡在线观看| 亚洲人成网站在线观看播放| 精品国产露脸久久av麻豆| 哪个播放器可以免费观看大片| av免费在线看不卡| 视频中文字幕在线观看| 老司机影院成人| 中文字幕免费在线视频6| 赤兔流量卡办理| 色网站视频免费| 久久热精品热| 十分钟在线观看高清视频www| 成人国产av品久久久| 精品熟女少妇av免费看| 国产成人一区二区在线| 九草在线视频观看| 国产av码专区亚洲av| 精品熟女少妇av免费看| 成人毛片a级毛片在线播放| 视频在线观看一区二区三区| 国产永久视频网站| 如日韩欧美国产精品一区二区三区 | 五月玫瑰六月丁香| 男女国产视频网站| 91久久精品国产一区二区三区| xxx大片免费视频| 国产精品三级大全| 黄片播放在线免费| 午夜免费鲁丝| 热99国产精品久久久久久7| 你懂的网址亚洲精品在线观看| 免费观看在线日韩| 欧美日韩精品成人综合77777| 边亲边吃奶的免费视频| 久久人妻熟女aⅴ| 日本wwww免费看| 夫妻午夜视频| 中文字幕av电影在线播放| 精品少妇内射三级| 国产精品熟女久久久久浪| 国产欧美日韩一区二区三区在线 | 秋霞伦理黄片| 久热这里只有精品99| 精品少妇黑人巨大在线播放| 欧美97在线视频| 国产熟女欧美一区二区| a级毛片在线看网站| 国产精品成人在线| 国产熟女午夜一区二区三区 | 色婷婷久久久亚洲欧美| 国产精品一区www在线观看| 久久久精品区二区三区| 午夜精品国产一区二区电影| 午夜福利视频在线观看免费| 国产精品国产av在线观看| 成人毛片60女人毛片免费| 亚洲av日韩在线播放| 街头女战士在线观看网站| 人人妻人人澡人人看| www.色视频.com| 亚洲av成人精品一二三区| 我的女老师完整版在线观看| 亚洲情色 制服丝袜| 91在线精品国自产拍蜜月| 嫩草影院入口| 高清av免费在线| 国产视频首页在线观看| 看非洲黑人一级黄片| 亚洲国产欧美在线一区| 高清不卡的av网站| 99久久精品国产国产毛片| 丰满饥渴人妻一区二区三| 精品99又大又爽又粗少妇毛片| 丰满饥渴人妻一区二区三| 国产乱人偷精品视频| 精品亚洲成a人片在线观看| 一个人免费看片子| 久久精品熟女亚洲av麻豆精品| 久久毛片免费看一区二区三区| 尾随美女入室| videosex国产| 满18在线观看网站| 日本av免费视频播放| 日本wwww免费看| 菩萨蛮人人尽说江南好唐韦庄| 有码 亚洲区| 久久精品久久精品一区二区三区| 日日爽夜夜爽网站| 五月天丁香电影| 丰满饥渴人妻一区二区三| 亚洲精品一区蜜桃| 欧美一级a爱片免费观看看| 国产精品一区二区在线观看99| .国产精品久久| 成人毛片a级毛片在线播放| 亚洲色图 男人天堂 中文字幕 | 亚洲,一卡二卡三卡| 亚洲精品国产av成人精品| 亚洲国产色片| 成人二区视频| 久久精品国产亚洲av天美| 国产精品99久久久久久久久| 国产男女超爽视频在线观看| 国产精品 国内视频| 3wmmmm亚洲av在线观看| 国产欧美另类精品又又久久亚洲欧美| 亚洲内射少妇av| 人人澡人人妻人| 秋霞在线观看毛片| 99热这里只有精品一区| 亚洲av成人精品一区久久| 99re6热这里在线精品视频| 亚洲成色77777| 国产精品 国内视频| 日本与韩国留学比较| 亚洲欧洲精品一区二区精品久久久 | 日韩三级伦理在线观看| 国产精品欧美亚洲77777| 视频区图区小说| 精品国产一区二区久久| 日韩大片免费观看网站| 国产成人av激情在线播放 | 天美传媒精品一区二区| 日日爽夜夜爽网站| 国产精品熟女久久久久浪| 国产乱来视频区| 国产精品麻豆人妻色哟哟久久| 亚洲精品美女久久av网站| 高清午夜精品一区二区三区| 高清黄色对白视频在线免费看| 91午夜精品亚洲一区二区三区| 乱码一卡2卡4卡精品| 久久久久久久久久久丰满| 国产成人精品一,二区| 考比视频在线观看| 国产男女超爽视频在线观看| 99国产综合亚洲精品| 免费人妻精品一区二区三区视频| 国产熟女午夜一区二区三区 | 久久99蜜桃精品久久| 国产一区亚洲一区在线观看| 丰满迷人的少妇在线观看| 精品国产国语对白av| 欧美 日韩 精品 国产| 日韩,欧美,国产一区二区三区| 国产熟女午夜一区二区三区 | 在现免费观看毛片| 老熟女久久久| 国产成人精品在线电影| 日韩大片免费观看网站| 亚洲婷婷狠狠爱综合网| 超碰97精品在线观看| 久久婷婷青草| 99视频精品全部免费 在线| 在线观看三级黄色| 精品少妇内射三级| 狠狠精品人妻久久久久久综合| 在线观看免费视频网站a站| 亚洲欧美精品自产自拍| 久久ye,这里只有精品| 一级黄片播放器| 大又大粗又爽又黄少妇毛片口| 蜜桃国产av成人99| 亚洲国产精品成人久久小说| av黄色大香蕉| 久久久久国产网址| 国产精品一国产av| 狂野欧美激情性xxxx在线观看| 国产精品久久久久成人av| 久久精品国产a三级三级三级| 蜜桃在线观看..| 免费观看a级毛片全部| 在线免费观看不下载黄p国产| 国产探花极品一区二区| 桃花免费在线播放| 亚洲人成网站在线播| 国产成人精品久久久久久| 一边亲一边摸免费视频| 国产高清三级在线| 看非洲黑人一级黄片| 三级国产精品片| 日韩熟女老妇一区二区性免费视频| 国产成人免费观看mmmm| 伊人久久国产一区二区| 一级,二级,三级黄色视频| 男女边吃奶边做爰视频| 久久久久久久亚洲中文字幕| 亚洲激情五月婷婷啪啪| 性色avwww在线观看| 另类亚洲欧美激情| 波野结衣二区三区在线| 国产精品欧美亚洲77777| 色婷婷久久久亚洲欧美| 黄色欧美视频在线观看| 午夜日本视频在线| 一级毛片我不卡| 久久精品国产a三级三级三级| 另类亚洲欧美激情| 永久网站在线| 97超视频在线观看视频| 91精品国产国语对白视频| tube8黄色片| 99精国产麻豆久久婷婷| 中国三级夫妇交换| 精品卡一卡二卡四卡免费| 欧美3d第一页| 国产有黄有色有爽视频| 亚洲综合色惰| 少妇猛男粗大的猛烈进出视频| 欧美3d第一页| 成人免费观看视频高清| 在线观看三级黄色| 能在线免费看毛片的网站| 蜜桃国产av成人99| 欧美激情 高清一区二区三区| 国产有黄有色有爽视频| 最近中文字幕高清免费大全6| 亚洲欧美一区二区三区国产| 最近中文字幕2019免费版| 久久久久久久精品精品| 精品人妻在线不人妻| 成人黄色视频免费在线看| 国产精品一二三区在线看| 欧美三级亚洲精品| 亚洲综合精品二区| 欧美人与善性xxx| 国产伦精品一区二区三区视频9| 好男人视频免费观看在线| 少妇的逼水好多| 午夜福利在线观看免费完整高清在| 亚洲,一卡二卡三卡| 久热这里只有精品99| 视频区图区小说| 亚洲精品中文字幕在线视频| 天天躁夜夜躁狠狠久久av| 下体分泌物呈黄色| av有码第一页| av免费在线看不卡| 亚洲人成网站在线播| 在线天堂最新版资源| 日韩欧美精品免费久久| 国产在线视频一区二区| 黄片播放在线免费| 黄色欧美视频在线观看| 欧美人与性动交α欧美精品济南到 | 亚洲av在线观看美女高潮| 免费人妻精品一区二区三区视频| 成年人午夜在线观看视频| 九草在线视频观看| 成人影院久久| 日韩成人伦理影院| 99热网站在线观看| 国产精品国产三级国产专区5o| 日韩不卡一区二区三区视频在线| 水蜜桃什么品种好| 色94色欧美一区二区| 99久久综合免费| 麻豆成人av视频| 人人澡人人妻人| 国产淫语在线视频| 国产精品秋霞免费鲁丝片| 自线自在国产av| 在线观看免费日韩欧美大片 | 亚洲av成人精品一区久久| 国产伦精品一区二区三区视频9| 热99国产精品久久久久久7| 精品视频人人做人人爽| 丰满乱子伦码专区| 中文字幕人妻熟人妻熟丝袜美| 亚洲一区二区三区欧美精品| 国模一区二区三区四区视频| 久久久久久久久久人人人人人人| 亚洲精品国产色婷婷电影| 少妇精品久久久久久久| √禁漫天堂资源中文www| 久久久久久久大尺度免费视频| 亚洲精品视频女| 亚洲欧美清纯卡通| 日本-黄色视频高清免费观看| 99九九线精品视频在线观看视频| 国产色爽女视频免费观看| 制服诱惑二区| 最近的中文字幕免费完整| 永久网站在线| 一本大道久久a久久精品| 国产成人精品福利久久| 亚洲一级一片aⅴ在线观看| 99热这里只有精品一区| 国产黄频视频在线观看| 一级黄片播放器| 久久99一区二区三区| 国产免费视频播放在线视频| 亚洲国产日韩一区二区| 成人无遮挡网站| 99国产精品免费福利视频| 少妇的逼好多水| 国产一区有黄有色的免费视频| 久久免费观看电影| 夜夜骑夜夜射夜夜干| 成年美女黄网站色视频大全免费 | 涩涩av久久男人的天堂| 日本午夜av视频| av线在线观看网站| 2022亚洲国产成人精品| 亚洲国产精品成人久久小说| 久久女婷五月综合色啪小说| 观看美女的网站| 97在线人人人人妻| 成人国语在线视频| 日日啪夜夜爽| 国产一区二区在线观看日韩| 韩国av在线不卡| 99精国产麻豆久久婷婷| 国产精品久久久久成人av| 伦理电影大哥的女人| 色哟哟·www| 乱码一卡2卡4卡精品| 成人手机av| 亚洲人成网站在线播| 国产黄色免费在线视频| 免费日韩欧美在线观看| 99视频精品全部免费 在线| 黄片播放在线免费| 老司机影院毛片| 亚洲,一卡二卡三卡| 国产成人午夜福利电影在线观看| 七月丁香在线播放| 纯流量卡能插随身wifi吗| 国产熟女午夜一区二区三区 | 国产一区二区三区综合在线观看 | 国产毛片在线视频| 国产精品久久久久久av不卡| 成年人免费黄色播放视频| av一本久久久久| 丁香六月天网| 久久久久久久久大av| 夜夜爽夜夜爽视频| 一级片'在线观看视频| av在线app专区| 日本wwww免费看| 夜夜爽夜夜爽视频| 亚洲国产欧美在线一区| 免费少妇av软件| 爱豆传媒免费全集在线观看| 亚洲少妇的诱惑av| 欧美精品一区二区免费开放| 国产片特级美女逼逼视频| 亚洲,欧美,日韩| 中文精品一卡2卡3卡4更新| 另类精品久久| 精品国产一区二区三区久久久樱花| 爱豆传媒免费全集在线观看| 在线免费观看不下载黄p国产| 国产精品人妻久久久久久| 欧美日韩视频精品一区| 丰满少妇做爰视频| 另类亚洲欧美激情| 99热国产这里只有精品6| 51国产日韩欧美| 伦理电影大哥的女人| 狂野欧美激情性xxxx在线观看| 少妇 在线观看| 欧美三级亚洲精品| 亚洲av电影在线观看一区二区三区| 飞空精品影院首页| 欧美日韩一区二区视频在线观看视频在线| 伦理电影免费视频| av黄色大香蕉| 又大又黄又爽视频免费| 黄色视频在线播放观看不卡| 一级毛片黄色毛片免费观看视频| www.色视频.com| 欧美 亚洲 国产 日韩一| 亚洲国产精品999| 亚洲av.av天堂| 少妇熟女欧美另类| 亚洲av二区三区四区| 啦啦啦视频在线资源免费观看| 成年av动漫网址| 国产黄色免费在线视频| 国产免费一区二区三区四区乱码| tube8黄色片| 一本—道久久a久久精品蜜桃钙片| 亚洲国产欧美日韩在线播放| 国产 一区精品| 建设人人有责人人尽责人人享有的| 十八禁网站网址无遮挡| 男女国产视频网站| 国产成人freesex在线| 精品久久国产蜜桃| 黄色一级大片看看| 久久国产亚洲av麻豆专区| 日本黄大片高清| 丰满饥渴人妻一区二区三| 日本av免费视频播放| 乱码一卡2卡4卡精品| 亚州av有码| 国产精品久久久久久久久免| 777米奇影视久久| h视频一区二区三区| 日本爱情动作片www.在线观看| 久久久精品免费免费高清| 亚洲欧洲精品一区二区精品久久久 | 日韩精品有码人妻一区| 成人综合一区亚洲| 啦啦啦中文免费视频观看日本| 国产成人精品在线电影| 狂野欧美白嫩少妇大欣赏| 免费播放大片免费观看视频在线观看| 欧美亚洲日本最大视频资源| 日韩三级伦理在线观看| 麻豆成人av视频| 午夜福利影视在线免费观看| 纵有疾风起免费观看全集完整版| videos熟女内射| 久久久精品94久久精品| 久久久久久久久久成人| 99久国产av精品国产电影| 国产精品 国内视频| 水蜜桃什么品种好| 亚洲美女视频黄频| 亚洲少妇的诱惑av| 91久久精品国产一区二区三区| 99久久精品一区二区三区| 亚洲欧美日韩卡通动漫| 九九在线视频观看精品| 欧美丝袜亚洲另类| 免费播放大片免费观看视频在线观看| 久久国产精品男人的天堂亚洲 | av播播在线观看一区| videos熟女内射| 国产伦精品一区二区三区视频9| 欧美日韩亚洲高清精品| 亚洲av男天堂| 秋霞伦理黄片| 美女福利国产在线| 99视频精品全部免费 在线| 国产精品久久久久久精品电影小说| 中文天堂在线官网| a级毛片黄视频| 久久久久精品久久久久真实原创| 亚洲成人一二三区av| 自拍欧美九色日韩亚洲蝌蚪91| 日本91视频免费播放| 亚洲精品乱久久久久久| 人人妻人人爽人人添夜夜欢视频| 亚洲欧洲精品一区二区精品久久久 | 在线观看www视频免费| 免费不卡的大黄色大毛片视频在线观看| 久久久久久久大尺度免费视频| 一区二区av电影网| 亚洲第一av免费看| 国产免费视频播放在线视频| 99精国产麻豆久久婷婷| 丰满饥渴人妻一区二区三| 又大又黄又爽视频免费| 丁香六月天网| 久久久久精品久久久久真实原创| 婷婷成人精品国产| 色婷婷av一区二区三区视频| 免费黄频网站在线观看国产| 最近最新中文字幕免费大全7| 狠狠精品人妻久久久久久综合| 久久久久精品久久久久真实原创| 婷婷色综合www| 日韩av不卡免费在线播放| 97在线人人人人妻| 精品久久久久久久久av| 久久久欧美国产精品| 高清欧美精品videossex| 亚洲精品乱码久久久久久按摩| 国产成人aa在线观看| 菩萨蛮人人尽说江南好唐韦庄| 国产亚洲精品第一综合不卡 | 18禁裸乳无遮挡动漫免费视频| 婷婷成人精品国产| 亚洲精品久久久久久婷婷小说| 亚洲国产最新在线播放| 久久久国产精品麻豆| 日本爱情动作片www.在线观看| 精品少妇黑人巨大在线播放| 欧美日韩视频高清一区二区三区二| 考比视频在线观看| 精品久久国产蜜桃| 国产一区有黄有色的免费视频| 国产伦精品一区二区三区视频9| 美女视频免费永久观看网站| 欧美人与性动交α欧美精品济南到 | 看非洲黑人一级黄片| 天堂俺去俺来也www色官网| 男女边摸边吃奶| 99热6这里只有精品| 婷婷色麻豆天堂久久| 秋霞在线观看毛片| 久久久久久久久久久久大奶| 国产精品蜜桃在线观看| 最黄视频免费看| 欧美 日韩 精品 国产|