主要設(shè)計者：凱-烏維·伯格曼，比亞克·因格爾斯/BIG建筑事務(wù)所；馬泰斯·鮑/One建筑事務(wù)所

第四屆全球豪瑞獎銅獎：城市防洪基礎(chǔ)設(shè)施，紐約市，美國

主要設(shè)計者：凱-烏維·伯格曼，比亞克·因格爾斯/BIG建筑事務(wù)所；馬泰斯·鮑/One建筑事務(wù)所

1 鳥瞰/Aerial view

評委評語

盡管該項目方案還存在爭議，但是它的優(yōu)點在于提出了將基礎(chǔ)設(shè)施轉(zhuǎn)變成面向公眾開放的城市空間的構(gòu)想和承諾。一方面，評審團贊賞方案中大膽提出的通過構(gòu)建能夠為社會提供剩余價值的建筑物來應(yīng)對氣候變化帶來的影響，即：將問題轉(zhuǎn)換成機遇。

另一方面，該方案中提出解決氣候變化的影響而非根源性問題，又顯得過于被動，缺乏積極性。拋開爭議不論，該項目通過建筑和城市建設(shè)方案表明了一種政治立場，那就是氣候變化已不容逃避，也不容被棄之為環(huán)保人士的憑空臆想，真實的解決方案切實存在。此外，評審團認為該項目模式有可能在其他地方推廣應(yīng)用。那就是通過以紐約方案為原型進行學習，從而為全球范圍內(nèi)易于遭受災(zāi)害的地區(qū)，尤其是那些經(jīng)濟資源有限的地區(qū)，尋找到類似的解決方案。

2 “干線”包含了一個專門為每個街區(qū)和社群設(shè)計的長21km的保護帶/Te Dryline contains a protective ribbon: 21 km of flood protection tailored to each neighborhood and the community it serves.

Jury Appraisal

Notwithstanding the merit of the proposal's vision and its commitment to translate an infrastructure into an urban space accessible to all, the project was nonetheless controversially discussed. On the one hand, the jury appreciated the scheme's bold proposition to tackle the ramifications of climate change by means of a construction that offers a surplus value to society – turning a problem into an opportunity.

On the other hand, the issue was raised as to whether the project was not more reactive rather than proactive, addressing the effects of climate change instead of its root causes. Debate aside, the project makes a political statement by means of an architectural and urban proposition, arguing that climate change indeed can no longer be suppressed or discarded as a figment of environmentalist imagination and that tangible solutions truly exist. Moreover, the jury considered the project's potential as model to be applied in other contexts, with the case of New York understood as a prototype from which to learn in order to pursue similar strategies in susceptible regions around the globe, including, most importantly, regions with limited economic resources.

4th Global Holcim Awards Bronze: Urban Flood Protection Infrastructure, New York City, USA

Main Authors: Kai-Uwe Bergmann, Bjarke Ingels/BIG–Bjarke Ingels Group; Matthijs Bouw/One Architecture