• 
    

    
    

      99热精品在线国产_美女午夜性视频免费_国产精品国产高清国产av_av欧美777_自拍偷自拍亚洲精品老妇_亚洲熟女精品中文字幕_www日本黄色视频网_国产精品野战在线观看 ?

      A Study of Stance Markers in Argumentative Writing: A Corpus—based Approach

      2018-10-25 10:39:20糜卓穎
      校園英語·中旬 2018年10期
      關(guān)鍵詞:武漢理工大學(xué)碩士學(xué)位簡(jiǎn)介

      【Abstract】Using Hylands interactional meta-discourse framework as the model, the study is based on a sub-corpus of CLEC, aiming to make comparisons of stance markers among students with different scores.

      【Key words】Argumentative Writing; Stance Markers; CLEC

      【作者簡(jiǎn)介】糜卓穎(1994.05.19-),女,湖北武漢人,碩士學(xué)位,武漢理工大學(xué),研究方向:應(yīng)用語言學(xué)。

      1. Introduction

      Most students find it hard to make persuasive arguments in argumentative writing. Stance expresses voice. Proper stance markers are vital in argumentative writing. Previous studies were mostly based on academic articles instead of L2 argumentative writing. In view of this, this study will study stance markers in L2 argumentative writing. More specifically, this study will explore following questions:

      1.1 What are similarities of stance markers between the higher group and the lower group in argumentative writing?

      1.2 What are differences of stance markers between the higher group and the lower group in argumentative writing?

      2. Methodology

      2.1 Data Collection

      The classification of stance in this study is shown in Table 1.

      Table 1 The Classification of Stance Markers (Hyland,2008)

      Category Function Examples (4)

      Hedges withhold commitment and open dialogue perhaps;

      Boosters emphasize certainty or close dialogue in fact;

      Attitude Markers express writers attitude to proposition unfortunately

      Self Mention explicit reference to authors we

      This study investigated stance markers used by non-English major students from a sub corpus of CLEC. Coders selected 60 argumentative essays from ST3 randomly and divided those essays into a high-score group and a low-score group according to a rubric developed by Qin. Then, in order to ensure accuracy, the two coders firstly coded stance markers in 10 argumentative essays. Before negotiations, the two coders accordance ratio achieved 88%. Later, two coders coded stance markers in these 60 argumentative essays and argued those controversial ones to reach a consensus. And final results were shown through chi-square tests.

      2.2 Tools

      The corpus tool used in this study is SPSS 17. Researchers calculated standard frequencies in per 1,000 words. Then researchers observed results through chi-square tests.

      3. Findings and Discussion

      Final results are shown in Table 2.

      Table 2 Distribution of stance markers

      3.1 Similarities of Stance Markers between the Higher Group and the Lower Group

      There are no significant differences in hedges and boosters as shown in Table 2, but both high-score students and low-score students use more boosters than hedges.

      In addition, compared with other 3 categories, the number of attitude markers in both groups is the least. Researchers argued attitude markers make readers explicit about writers attitudes in some degree, but readers can comprehend authors viewpoints through contents. Using too much attitude markers will make the whole passage informal.

      3.2 Differences Stance Markers between the Higher Group and the Lower Group

      From Table 2, there existed a significant difference in self-mentions. High-score students used more self-mentions in their writings, which may be concerned with writing education. Besides, high-score students used more attitude markers since high-score students have various ways to express themselves.

      4. Conclusion

      The study reveals compared with low-score students, high-score students use more authorial presence markers. Low-score students have limited ways to express themselves. Neither high-score students nor low-score students use attitude markers frequently, but high-score students are prone to express their views direct and make their arguments persuasive.

      References:

      [1]Hyland,K. Meta-discourse[M].Beijing:Foreign Language Teaching And Research Press,2008.

      [2]Qin J. Applying the Toulmin Model in Teaching L2 Argumentative Writing[J].Journal of Language Teaching & Learning,2013.

      猜你喜歡
      武漢理工大學(xué)碩士學(xué)位簡(jiǎn)介
      《武漢理工大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(交通科學(xué)與工程版)》征稿簡(jiǎn)則
      《武漢理工大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(交通科學(xué)與工程版)》征稿簡(jiǎn)則
      我校成功獲批碩士學(xué)位授予單位及3個(gè)碩士學(xué)位授權(quán)點(diǎn)
      Research on Guidance Mechanism of Public Opinion in Colleges and Universities in Micro Era
      Book review on “Educating Elites”
      Hometown
      在美國(guó)對(duì)于就業(yè)來說最好和最差的碩士學(xué)位
      海外星云(2016年17期)2016-12-01 04:18:38
      Lanterne-volant
      幾何形態(tài)和視覺感知的探討
      軍事科學(xué)院1990年招收攻讀碩士學(xué)位研究生
      軍事歷史(1990年1期)1990-01-18 02:40:24
      嵩明县| 黄平县| 凌海市| 泸溪县| 临高县| 宽城| 江川县| 华亭县| 长白| 巩留县| 靖边县| 旬邑县| 铜鼓县| 黄浦区| 海宁市| 牡丹江市| 晋城| 和田市| 兴义市| 兴宁市| 临颍县| 通州市| 和林格尔县| 平和县| 牡丹江市| 凤庆县| 辉县市| 崇礼县| 邢台市| 华坪县| 和龙市| 玛多县| 安吉县| 灯塔市| 曲松县| 长乐市| 南投县| 瑞昌市| 酒泉市| 竹溪县| 志丹县|