楊旭瓊，吳珍芳，李紫聰

哺乳動物體細胞核移植表觀遺傳重編程研究進展

楊旭瓊，吳珍芳，李紫聰

華南農(nóng)業(yè)大學動物科學學院，國家生豬種業(yè)工程技術研究中心，廣州 510642

體細胞核移植(somatic cell nuclear transfer, SCNT)是唯一能賦予體細胞基因組全能性的生殖工程技術，對動物種質(zhì)資源保存、畜牧業(yè)發(fā)展和生物醫(yī)學研究等具有重大意義。盡管該技術已經(jīng)取得了許多研究進展，但哺乳動物克隆胚胎的發(fā)育效率依然很低，嚴重限制其在畜牧業(yè)和生物醫(yī)學上的應用。導致克隆胚胎發(fā)育效率低的主要原因是體細胞重編程錯誤或重編程不完全，主要表現(xiàn)為：印記基因表達異常、DNA甲基化異常，組蛋白修飾異常等。本文簡要介紹了體細胞核移植技術，系統(tǒng)總結(jié)了哺乳動物克隆胚胎發(fā)育效率低的主要影響因素，以期為提升體細胞克隆效率相關研究與實踐提供理論參考。

體細胞核移植；；DNA甲基化；組蛋白修飾

體細胞核移植(somatic cell nuclear transfer, SCNT)又稱體細胞克隆，指利用顯微操作技術，以去核卵母細胞為受體，單細胞核為供體，將體細胞核移入成熟的去核卵母細胞中，激活形成克隆胚胎，進而培育出基因型與供體體細胞相同的克隆動物(圖1)。體細胞核移植技術是當代生命科學研究和應用的關鍵技術之一，是生命科學研究高水平發(fā)展的體現(xiàn)，在農(nóng)業(yè)動物生產(chǎn)、藥物生產(chǎn)、再生醫(yī)學和保護寶貴遺傳資源等方面具有廣泛的應用價值。然而，克隆胚胎的發(fā)育效率遠遠低于體外受精胚的發(fā)育效率，哺乳動物的克隆胚胎發(fā)育效率只有1%~5%[1]，嚴重限制了克隆技術的發(fā)展。導致體細胞克隆效率低下的主要原因是體細胞重編程錯誤或重編程不完全[2,3]。鑒于此，研究人員希望通過一些有效的技術手段來提高克隆胚胎的發(fā)育能力，如采用不同的細胞系作為供體細胞，同時優(yōu)化克隆操作的融合參數(shù)[4~7]、敲除印記基因(X-inactive specific trans-cript)[8]、RNA干擾技術(RNA interference, RNAi)抑制基因的異常表達[9]、注射Kdm4b或Kdm5b去甲基化酶[10,11]等。這些研究雖然取得了一定的效果，但大多數(shù)研究結(jié)果表明克隆效率并沒有大幅度的提高，且克隆動物后代存在諸多異常。因此，如何克服克隆效率低下和解決克隆動物異常成為體細胞克隆研究的熱點。

體細胞克隆的供體細胞是高度分化的體細胞，具有高度特異的DNA修飾和組蛋白修飾，以此來維持體細胞的細胞特性。由于克隆胚胎的發(fā)育依賴于體細胞的細胞核，所以當供體細胞核被放置到成熟的去核卵母細胞中時，供體細胞核必須經(jīng)過重編程，抹去分化狀態(tài)的細胞記憶，激活對早期胚胎發(fā)育具有重要作用的基因，如多能性基因、抑制與分化相關的基因，從而使得體細胞獲得發(fā)育的全能性[12]。由于重編程發(fā)生在一個相對較短的時間框架內(nèi)，若克隆胚胎的發(fā)育與正常的胚胎發(fā)育不一致，克隆胚胎的發(fā)育狀態(tài)會出現(xiàn)一系列的錯誤。越來越多的數(shù)據(jù)表明，錯誤的重編程模式會使克隆動物出現(xiàn)表觀遺傳修飾的偏差。如X染色體失活[13]、印記基因與非印記基因的表達[3,12~14]、DNA甲基化[15~17]和染色體修飾[18]等。本文對體細胞核移植技術的發(fā)展以及影響克隆胚胎發(fā)育效率低的主要原因進行了總結(jié)，以期為未來提高哺乳動物克隆發(fā)育效率的研究提供參考。

1 體細胞核移植技術

1.1 體細胞核移植技術的發(fā)展歷程

SCNT技術實現(xiàn)了體細胞的全能性。早在1952年，英國遺傳學家Briggs和King將青蛙()胚胎卵裂球細胞的細胞核移植到去核的卵母細胞中，以此來研究胚胎干細胞的細胞核是否發(fā)生分化。這是首次利用兩棲動物的胚胎干細胞實現(xiàn)胚胎細胞核移植技術，但是當時并未成功克隆出青蛙[19]。1962年，英國生物學家Gurdon首次在兩棲動物上利用SCNT技術成功地將分化的青蛙體細胞克隆出小蝌蚪[20]。直到1997年第一頭克隆羊“多莉”(Dolly)誕生[21]，這是世界上第一個克隆成功的哺乳動物。隨后，奶牛()[22]、小鼠()[23]、山羊()[24]、豬()[25,26]、兔子()[27]、貓()[28]、騾子()[29]、馬()[30]、大鼠()[31]、獵犬(Canislupus familiaris)[32]和駱駝()[33]等成功克隆的20多種哺乳動物相繼問世。2017年，我國成功克隆出世界上第一批體細胞克隆猴()[34]。

圖1 體細胞核移植的流程

1.2 體細胞核移植技術的應用和存在問題

SCNT技術能夠培育優(yōu)良畜種，如選育高品質(zhì)家畜和擴大繁殖高性能產(chǎn)量個體；此外還可以培育抗病物種、制備異種器官移植供體動物、制備人類疾病動物模型和轉(zhuǎn)基因動物生物反應器等。除了克隆動物外，SCNT在干細胞生物學和人類疾病治療等方面具有巨大的潛力。受精卵發(fā)育到囊胚期分化形成內(nèi)細胞團(inner cell mass, ICM)和滋養(yǎng)層細胞(trophoblast, TE)，其中ICM可分離培養(yǎng)出胚胎干細胞(embryonic stem cells, ESCs)。克隆胚胎發(fā)育到囊胚期，ICM也可分離培養(yǎng)出多能干細胞(pluripotent stem cells, PSCs)或者稱核移植胚胎干細胞(nuclear transfer embryonic stem cells, ntESCs)[35]。

在生物醫(yī)學疾病治療方面，治療性克隆能夠通過培養(yǎng)人的ntESCs，建立并保存每個個體自身的ntESCs，用于組織和器官替代療法?；颊叩膎tESCs和患者本身具有相同的基因組，可避免排斥反應等不適問題[36,37]。2001年，Wakayama等[38]在成年小鼠體細胞克隆胚胎中分離出了具備多能性特征的核移植ESCs，這也是第一例ntESCs，為人ntESCs的研究提供了實驗基礎。Rideout等[39]通過同源重組的方法實現(xiàn)了突變等位基因的遺傳固定，并獲得ntESCs細胞系用作治療免疫缺陷小鼠。2007年，Byrne等[40]成功獲得猴子的ntESCs。2013年，Tachibana等[35]獲得了第一例人的ntESCs。隨后，更多的實驗室相繼報道獲得了健康成年人[41]、糖尿病[37]及老年性黃斑變性病[36]人體細胞來源的ntESCs。眾所周知，ntESCs在人類中的研究能為組織和器官功能失調(diào)或受損的患者提供干細胞新來源。這種干細胞可以更新和替換損壞了的細胞或組織，可為上百萬的患者減緩病情。在臨床上用患有線粒體疾病患者的卵細胞核移植到另一個健康去核卵細胞中，從而阻斷線粒體疾病的下一代遺傳。2017年張進等[42]利用Leigh氏綜合征攜帶者卵細胞紡錘體移植獲得了健康嬰兒，這是第一例線粒體替代嬰兒。當然，線粒體疾病的替代治療存在人們關心的倫理問題，這也是阻礙其臨床廣泛推廣的主要原因。

目前，SCNT技術已經(jīng)成熟，但是依然存在一些問題，嚴重限制其在生產(chǎn)實際中的應用和發(fā)展?？偟膩碚f，哺乳動物的克隆效率都比較低下，主要表現(xiàn)在：克隆胚胎體外發(fā)育效率低，如猴SCNT單個卵母細胞的孵化效率僅為0.7%[40]；體內(nèi)發(fā)育至出生效率低，例如豬的出生率大約在0.5%~1%左右[43,44]。在克隆胚胎中，由TE分化形成的胎盤經(jīng)常存在異常狀態(tài)[45]，胎盤異常幾乎是所有克隆哺乳動物的一個共有特征，例如胎盤增生、胎盤血管缺陷、臍帶畸形[46]等。此外，克隆動物的健康狀況也存在一定的異常，包括肥胖、免疫及呼吸缺陷和早期死亡等[45,47,48]。由于SCNT技術受到卵母細胞、供體細胞的質(zhì)量以及代孕母體等個體差異的影響，因此很難從統(tǒng)計學的數(shù)據(jù)分析上確定影響因素[49]。

2 表觀遺傳重編程對體細胞核移植胚胎發(fā)育效率的影響

生物體的大多數(shù)細胞具有相同的遺傳物質(zhì)，SCNT重編程主要通過表觀遺傳重編程來實現(xiàn)。在克隆胚胎發(fā)育早期，存在體細胞標記和細胞類型特異性分化記憶。無論是體細胞標記還是細胞特異性分化記憶都可能導致特定的重編程錯誤，致使在克隆胚胎發(fā)育過程中出現(xiàn)各種異常。若要使其正常發(fā)育，克隆胚胎應該以某種方式克服這兩個表觀遺傳障礙。因此，當供體細胞核與去核的卵母細胞融合后，供體細胞核需要對核內(nèi)已有的表觀遺傳修飾進行重編程，即擦除供體細胞表觀遺傳模式，激活與胚胎發(fā)育相關的基因，抑制與細胞分化相關的基因，重新獲得發(fā)育的全能性。當胚胎附植于子宮后，胚胎從全能狀態(tài)再分化，用于組織生成及器官發(fā)生[50]。而在克隆胚胎重編程的過程中，由于體細胞的表觀遺傳修飾去除不完全，未能建立起正確的表觀遺傳修飾來調(diào)控胚胎的正常發(fā)育，致使其出現(xiàn)各種異常。表觀遺傳重編程主要包括基因組印記、X染色體失活、DNA甲基化和組蛋白修飾等(表1)。

2.1 抑制印記基因Xist表達可顯著提高體細胞核移植胚胎發(fā)育效率

XY型哺乳動物，其X和Y染色體是由同源常染色體進化而來。由于雄性和雌性X染色體上的基因數(shù)目不同，兩者之間存在大規(guī)模的遺傳失衡，為平衡這種劑量差異，在雌性胚胎發(fā)育過程中會選擇失活其中一條X染色體[51]。基因是X染色體上順式調(diào)控X染色體失活的印記基因，其轉(zhuǎn)錄產(chǎn)物是在X染色體失活中心(X-chromosome inactivation, XCI)開始轉(zhuǎn)錄的長鏈非編碼RNA(long non-coding RNA, lncRNA)，轉(zhuǎn)錄產(chǎn)物lncRNA通過包圍整條X染色體使得X染色體失活[52]。

表1 小鼠和豬SCNT胚胎發(fā)育效率的表觀遺傳重編程影響因素及對策

哺乳動物X染色體存在兩種形式的失活方式：印記失活和隨機失活。XCI在胚胎發(fā)育早期建立，受胚胎發(fā)育調(diào)控，且調(diào)控方式與物種種類密切相關[53]。雌性小鼠胚胎發(fā)育過程中，在胚胎2~4細胞期基因從父源X染色體上開始轉(zhuǎn)錄啟動表達，致使父方來源X染色體失活，此印記表達模式，在胚胎外組織中始終維持[54]。當胚胎發(fā)育到囊胚期時，這種印記形式的X染色體失活會在ICM中經(jīng)歷再活化，直至胚胎著床期，ICM中會隨機失活一條X染色體[55]。但是，人類胚胎發(fā)育中表達模式并沒有像小鼠一樣，而是在胚胎發(fā)育后期隨機失活[56]。

動物克隆胚胎發(fā)育過程中存在許多表達異常的基因，是其中之一[57]。印記基因的表達與表觀遺傳修飾乙酰化、甲基化密切相關，包括組蛋白H3和H4低乙酰化、H3-lysine 4(H3K4)低甲基化、H3-lysine 9 (H3K9)甲基化和多梳沉默復合體(poly-comb repressive complex 2, PRC2)依賴的H3-lysine 27 (H3K27)甲基化等[58,59]。比較克隆胚胎和受精胚胎的轉(zhuǎn)錄產(chǎn)物，發(fā)現(xiàn)無論雌性或雄性小鼠克隆胚胎中基因都異常表達，其X染色體連鎖基因都受到持續(xù)地特異性抑制，導致染色體水平的基因大面積下調(diào)[8]。同樣，F(xiàn)ukuda等[60]發(fā)現(xiàn)小鼠克隆胚胎中異常表達，X染色體異常失活。研究表明，在小鼠克隆胚胎桑葚胚期開始異常高表達，結(jié)果導致了染色體水平的大面積基因下調(diào)，利用基因缺陷型供體細胞用于克隆實驗，可顯著提高小鼠克隆效率，克隆效率提高到8~9倍[8]。在雄性小鼠克隆胚胎中注入抗的小干擾RNA (siRNA)，也觀察到了類似的效果，同時也表明克隆胚胎植入前的異常表達嚴重影響克隆胚胎的發(fā)育能力[9]。敲除供體細胞的基因或干擾克隆胚胎中的基因顯著的提高了小鼠的克隆效率，這說明糾正基因的錯誤表達對克隆胚胎的發(fā)育效率有顯著作用。

對豬而言，發(fā)育異常的克隆胎兒同樣存在的異常表達，且這種異常始于桑椹胚期[61]。通過RNAi的方式，在克隆胚胎1-細胞期注射siRNA，結(jié)果表明豬克隆胚的表達異常升高，小幅度提高了豬克隆胚胎發(fā)育效率[57]。一方面，由于克隆所用供體細胞是豬腎髓質(zhì)部細胞，該細胞易老化，易發(fā)生癌變，致使表達異常升高；另一方面，因為siRNA作用時間太短，當豬克隆胚胎發(fā)育到桑椹胚時，siRNA已經(jīng)失去它的干擾作用，所以通過注射siRNA提高豬克隆胚胎的發(fā)育效率似乎并不可行。此外，通過RNAi的方式干擾基因，對提高豬孤雌胚胎發(fā)育效率也有顯著效果[62]。Yang等[63]利用TALEN技術突變豬供體細胞的基因，結(jié)果表明X染色體部分再活化，并沒有提高豬克隆效率。Ruan等[64]利用TALEN技術在豬供體細胞基因第一外顯子重復序列前以插入大片段的方式破壞重復序列，進而失活基因，大幅度提高了豬的克隆發(fā)育效率。但是，出生豬只數(shù)較少，共移植530個豬克隆胚胎，獲得健康克隆胎兒11只。

2.2 DNA去甲基化水平影響體細胞核移植胚胎發(fā)育效率

哺乳動物DNA甲基化是指在DNA甲基化轉(zhuǎn)移酶(DNA methyltransferase, DNMT)的幫助下，將DNA分子中S-腺苷蛋氨酸的甲基轉(zhuǎn)移至胞嘧啶殘基的第5位碳原子上的過程[65~67]。DNA甲基化由DNMT建立和維持，相反地，TET蛋白酶(ten-eleven translocation, TET)可以催化5-mC (5-methylcyto-sine, 5-mC)轉(zhuǎn)化為5-羥甲基胞嘧啶(5-hydroxymeth-ylcytosine, 5-hmC)，進而啟動DNA去甲基化程序[68,69]。哺乳動物早期胚胎發(fā)育，基因組中的DNA甲基化修飾會發(fā)生重編程過程，廣泛進行去甲基化，以此在囊胚期達到最低水平。牛、鼠、豬等動物受精后，父本和母本經(jīng)歷不同的去甲基化方式，前者主動去甲基化，后者被動去甲基化[16,70]。DNA去甲基化是細胞多能性建立和維持的關鍵步驟，是重編程的第一步，同時也是核移植后早期胚胎發(fā)育正常啟動和維持的重要環(huán)節(jié)[71]，對表觀遺傳修飾起到關鍵作用。體細胞基因組的CpG島大多數(shù)處于高度甲基化狀態(tài)，全面去甲基化則是SCNT重編程的必須步驟[72]。相比正常的體外受精胚胎，克隆胚胎基因組去甲基化也發(fā)生在卵裂時期，但是克隆胚胎去甲基化不完全，其基因組甲基化水平更接近體細胞的狀態(tài)[50]。Inoue等[73]研究發(fā)現(xiàn)，在小鼠受精胚胎中，除印記基因外，新合成的DNA大多未被甲基化。然而，Matoba等[74]研究發(fā)現(xiàn)在小鼠克隆胚胎囊胚期，某些基因的啟動子部位具有高水平的DNA甲基化。Gao等[75]研究表明異常的DNA再甲基化阻礙了合子基因組激活，是影響SCNT胚胎發(fā)育的重要表觀遺傳障礙。DNMT的抑制能夠克服DNA再甲基化的缺陷，同時提高植入后SCNT胚胎發(fā)育效率及克隆效率，抑制DNMT和過表達組蛋白賴氨酸去甲基化酶(K-demethylases, Kdms)相結(jié)合的方法可以進一步提高克隆效率。以上研究表明，DNA甲基化程度是重要的表觀遺傳障礙之一。

2.3 組蛋白修飾可改善體細胞核移植胚胎發(fā)育效率

組蛋白脫乙酰酶(histone deacetylase, HDAC)可調(diào)節(jié)組蛋白的乙酰化水平，從而實現(xiàn)對基因表達的表觀遺傳調(diào)控[76]。組蛋白脫乙酰酶抑制劑(histone deacetylase inhibitor, HDACi)通過其功能基團與HDAC的Zn2+形成螯合物，抑制HDAC的活性，增加細胞內(nèi)組蛋白的乙酰化程度，從而提高靶基因的表達水平[76]。HDACi在動物克隆胚胎發(fā)育中被廣泛用來改善不同物種胚胎發(fā)育的重編程[77]。早在2006年Kishigami等[78]和Rybouchkin等[79]發(fā)現(xiàn)HDACi能使小鼠克隆胚胎效率從1%提高到6%。曲古抑菌素A (trichostatin A, TSA)是一種有效的HDACi。Inoue等[80]通過添加TSA藥物處理小鼠克隆胚胎，顯著提高了克隆胚胎2-細胞期后的發(fā)育效率，從而將克隆效率提高了5~10倍，但是TSA對克隆胚胎中異常表達的基因數(shù)量以及表達模式?jīng)]有影響。同樣，HDACi藥物治療使得豬[31,81,82]、牛[83~85]的克隆胚胎發(fā)育效率均有所提高，但其對SCNT重編程的機制仍不清楚。此外，也有研究表明用HDACi處理豬克隆胚胎，H3K14、H4K5和H4K8等賴氨酸殘基出現(xiàn)乙酰化現(xiàn)象[86,87]。

哺乳動物的卵母細胞和精子本身處于轉(zhuǎn)錄沉默，受精后，受精卵則恢復轉(zhuǎn)錄，該過程稱為合子基因組激活(zygotic genome activation, ZGA)。不同物種的ZGA時間不同，小鼠和人的ZGA時間分別在胚胎2-細胞期和胚胎8-細胞期。當ZGA啟動時，受精胚胎中母系儲存的RNA迅速降解，并被新合成的合子RNA取代。同樣地，克隆胚胎的ZGA也存在類似機制，且克隆胚胎早期發(fā)育過程中出現(xiàn)發(fā)育停滯的時間與ZGA時間高度相關。有研究表明，在小鼠克隆胚胎中大約有1000個基因組區(qū)域或基因未能在ZGA時間內(nèi)激活[11]。有趣的是，在重編程抵抗區(qū)(reprogramming-resistant regions, RRRs)富含轉(zhuǎn)錄抑制標記物H3K9me3，這說明了供體細胞中組蛋白H3K9me3可能是阻止克隆胚胎ZGA的屏障。Matoba等[11]通過注射H3K9me3特異性去甲基酶Kdm4d的mRNAs不僅克服了ZGA缺陷，而且解決了植入前胚胎發(fā)育停滯的問題，使得幼崽出生率提高了8%以上。

Wang等[88]揭示了異染色質(zhì)組蛋白修飾H3K9me3在配子細胞以及受精后和早期胚胎發(fā)育過程中的重編程與其在逆轉(zhuǎn)座子沉默中的作用及調(diào)控機制。相關研究表明，供體細胞和2-細胞期克隆胚胎中在某些區(qū)域都富含異染色質(zhì)組蛋白H3K9me3標記[89]，且在小鼠克隆胚胎2-細胞期，存在一些區(qū)域沒有去甲基化[10]。這一觀察結(jié)果也證實了供體細胞中H3K9me3是SCNT重編程的表觀遺傳屏障[11,36,44]。研究表明在小鼠克隆胚胎2-細胞期和4-細胞期注射Kdm4b和Kdm5b去甲基化酶，針對組蛋白H3K9me3和H3K4me3去甲基化，顯著提高了囊胚發(fā)育率，且從克隆胚胎中成功分離培養(yǎng)出ntESCs[10]。Matoba等[74]采用敲除(KO-)供體細胞與Kdm4d- mRNA注射相結(jié)合的方法，以支持細胞作為供體細胞克隆小鼠，使得克隆效率顯著提高到24%。盡管如此，小鼠克隆效率依然低于體外受精發(fā)育效率。最近研究表明，通過注射Kdm4b也可以提高豬[64]、牛[90]以及猴[34]的克隆效率。以上結(jié)果說明，H3K9me3去甲基化是克隆胚胎正常發(fā)育過程中重編程所必需的組蛋白修飾，同時也是克隆胚胎成功重編程的限制因素之一[91]。此外，母源印記H3K27me3組蛋白修飾同樣是影響克隆胚胎重編程的重要因素。研究發(fā)現(xiàn)，受精胚胎調(diào)控印記基因的母源H3K27me3結(jié)構(gòu)域并未在克隆胚胎中建立[92,93]，致使H3K27me3依賴性印記基因大部分失去其印記狀態(tài)，成為雙等位基因表達[74]。Inoue等[93]表示印記基因也受母源H3K27me3的調(diào)控，由于供體細胞的位點缺少H3K27me3標記，克隆胚胎中H3K27me3的重編程不完全，進而導致克隆胚胎異常激活。因此，為解決供體細胞中H3K27me3的缺失問題，在供體細胞母源等位基因中靶向沉積H3K27me3可能是一個必要的策略。

3 結(jié)語與展望

SCNT的成功是生命科學領域的一次重大突破，其在優(yōu)良種畜擴繁、瀕危物種保護、克隆性治療等方面具有廣闊的應用前景。然而，運用克隆技術成功克隆出青蛙距今已有50余年，克隆胚胎發(fā)育至成體的成功率仍保持在一個很低水平。盡管，自Dolly羊誕生20年來，科學家致力于SCNT操作過程中影響克隆胚胎發(fā)育效率的各種條件和參數(shù)的研究，但克隆效率并未得到顯著提高。克隆效率低的根本原因是供體細胞核的表觀重編程異常[50]。對此，人們需要對重編程過程中染色質(zhì)和表觀基因組的變化進行系統(tǒng)和詳細的分析。隨著測序技術的更新?lián)Q代，轉(zhuǎn)錄組測序及相關的表觀遺傳學研究，使得對SCNT的重編程研究成為可能[96]。從技術上來說，獲取足夠的克隆樣本用于此類分析仍然具有較高的難度，但近些年的相關研究證明，利用早期胚胎進行此類研究具有一定的可行性[57,97,98]。SCNT可將分化的體細胞重編程為全能性胚胎，但在克隆胚胎早期發(fā)育過程中，大多數(shù)克隆胚胎會出現(xiàn)停滯現(xiàn)象，其潛在的分子機制尚未明了?？蒲腥藛T對提高克隆效率的研究，使得表觀遺傳障礙與其特定的重編程錯誤兩者之間的關系變得更加清晰，從而更加準確地理解在細胞分化和克隆胚胎植入過程中，表觀遺傳調(diào)節(jié)機制的作用。此外，通過比較分析不同重編程系統(tǒng)之間的異同，來探究克隆胚胎的重編程機制也是一種可行的方案。例如，H3K9me3組蛋白修飾、染色質(zhì)組裝因子(CAF1)蛋白質(zhì)復合物、異染色質(zhì)蛋白1 (HP1)是誘導多能干細胞(induced pluripotent stem cells, iPSCs)重編程的障礙[99~101]，而iPSCs重編程與SCNT的重編程機制類似。對此，在今后的研究中，進一步探究這些重編程障礙是否也在SCNT重編程中起作用，可以作為體細胞核移植潛在的研究方向。

總之，供體核的表觀重編程異常修復依然是體細胞核移植研究及發(fā)展的重點。利用新型技術，如高通量測序[102,103]、CRISPR/Cas9[104,105]等，將更加快速準確地解析體細胞表觀重編程機制，從而大幅度提高克隆效率，降低克隆動物異常表型的發(fā)生率，最終將SCNT技術應用于更多領域。

[1] Sung LY, Gao S, Shen H, Yu H, Song Y, Smith SL, Chang CC, Inoue K, Kuo L, Lian J, Li A, Tian XC, Tuck DP, Weissman SM, Yang X, Cheng T. Differentiated cells are more efficient than adult stem cells for cloning by somatic cell nuclear transfer., 2006, 38(11): 1323–1328.

[2] Matoba S, Zhang Y. Somatic cell nuclear transfer reprogramming: mechanisms and applications., 2018, 23(4): 471–485.

[3] Rideout WM 3rd, Eggan K, Jaenisch R. Nuclear cloning and epigenetic reprogramming of the genome., 2001, 293(5532): 1093–1098.

[4] Dinnyés A, Dai Y, Jiang S, Yang X. High developmental rates of vitrified bovine oocytes following parthenogenetic activation, in vitro fertilization, and somatic cell nuclear transfer., 2000, 63(2): 513–518.

[5] Kato Y, Tani T, Tsunoda Y. Cloning of calves from various somatic cell types of male and female adult, newborn and fetal cows., 2000, 120(2): 231–237.

[6] Lee GS, Hyun SH, Kim HS, Kim DY, Lee SH, Lim JM, Lee ES, Kang SK, Lee BC, Hwang WS. Improvement of a porcine somatic cell nuclear transfer technique by optimizing donor cell and recipient oocyte preparations., 2003, 59(9): 1949–1957.

[7] Wilmut I, Schnieke AE, Mcwhir J, Kind AJ, Campbell KHS. Viable offspring derived from fetal and adult mammalian cells., 2007, 9(1): 3–7.

[8] Inoue K, Kohda T, Sugimoto M, Sado T, Ogonuki N, Matoba S, Shiura H, Ikeda R, Mochida K, Fujii T, Sawai K, Otte AP, Tian XC, Yang X, Ishino F, Abe K, Ogura A. Impeding Xist expression from the active X chromosome improves mouse somatic cell nuclear transfer., 2010, 330(6003): 496–499.

[9] Matoba S, Inoue K, Kohda T, Sugimoto M, Mizutani E, Ogonuki N, Nakamura T, Abe K, Nakano T, Ishino F, Ogura A. RNAi-mediated knockdown of Xist can rescue the impaired postimplantation development of cloned mouse embryos., 2011, 108(51): 20621–20626.

[10] Liu WQ, Liu XY, Wang CF, Gao YW, Gao R, Kou XC, Zhao YH, Li JY, Wu Y, Xiu WC, Wang S, Yin JQ, Liu W, Cai T, Wang H, Zhang Y, Gao SR. Identification of key factors conquering developmental arrest of somatic cell cloned embryos by combining embryo biopsy and single-cell sequencing., 2016, 2: 16010.

[11] Matoba S, Liu Y, Lu F, Iwabuchi KA, Shen L, Inoue A, Zhang Y. Embryonic development following somatic cell nuclear transfer impeded by persisting histone methylation., 2014, 159(4): 884–895.

[12] Humpherys D, Eggan K, Akutsu H, Friedman A, Hochedlinger K, Yanagimachi R, Lander ES, Golub TR, Jaenisch R. Abnormal gene expression in cloned mice derived from embryonic stem cell and cumulus cell nuclei., 2002, 99(20): 12889– 12894.

[13] Xue F, Tian XC, Du F, Kubota C, Taneja M, Dinnyes A, Dai Y, Levine H, Pereira LV, Yang X. Aberrant patterns of X chromosome inactivation in bovine clones., 2002, 31(2): 216–220.

[14] Niemann H, Wrenzycki C, Lucas-Hahn A, Brambrink T, Kues WA, Carnwath JW. Gene expression patterns in bovine in vitro-produced and nuclear transfer-derived embryos and their implications for early development., 2002, 4(1): 29–38.

[15] Bourc'his D, Le Bourhis D, Patin D, Niveleau A, Comizzoli P, Renard JP, Viegas-Péquignot E. Delayed and incomplete reprogramming of chromosome methy-lation patterns in bovine cloned embryos., 2001, 11(19): 1542–1546.

[16] Dean W, Santos F, Stojkovic M, Zakhartchenko V, Walter J, Wolf E, Reik W. Conservation of methylation reprogramming in mammalian development: aberrant reprogramming in cloned embryos., 2001, 98(24): 13734–13738.

[17] Kang YK, Koo DB, Park JS, Choi YH, Chung AS, Lee KK, Han YM. Aberrant methylation of donor genome in cloned bovine embryos., 2001, 28(2): 173– 177.

[18] Santos F, Zakhartchenko V, Stojkovic M, Peters A, Jenuwein T, Wolf E, Reik W, Dean W. Epigenetic marking correlates with developmental potential in cloned bovine preimplantation embryos., 2003, 13(13): 1116–1121.

[19] Briggs R, King TJ. Transplantation of living nuclei from blastula cells into enucleated frogs' eggs., 1952, 38(5): 455–463.

[20] Gurdon JB. The developmental capacity of nuclei taken from intestinal epithelium cells of feeding tadpoles., 1962, 10: 622–640.

[21] Wilmut I, Schnieke AE, Mcwhir J, Kind AJ, Campbell KHS. Viable offspring derived from fetal and adult mammalian cells., 1997, 385(6619): 810–813.

[22] Kato Y, Tani T, Sotomaru Y, Kurokawa K, Kato J, Doguchi H, Yasue H, Tsunoda Y. Eight calves cloned from somatic cells of a single adult., 1998, 282(5396): 2095–2098.

[23] Wakayama T, Perry AC, Zuccotti M, Johnson KR, Yanagimachi R. Full-term development of mice from enucleated oocytes injected with cumulus cell nuclei., 1998, 394(6691): 369–374.

[24] Baguisi A, Behboodi E, Melican DT, Pollock JS, Destrempes MM, Cammuso C, Williams JL, Nims SD, Porter CA, Midura P, Palacios MJ, Ayres SL, Denniston RS, Hayes ML, Ziomek CA, Meade HM, Godke RA, Gavin WG, Overstr?m EW, Echelard Y. Production of goats by somatic cell nuclear transfer., 1999, 17(5): 456–461.

[25] Polejaeva IA, Chen SH, Vaught TD, Page RL, Mullins J, Ball S, Dai Y, Boone J, Walker S, Ayares DL, Colman A, Campbell KH. Cloned pigs produced by nuclear transfer from adult somatic cells., 2000, 407(6800): 86–90.

[26] Onishi A, Iwamoto M, Akita T, Mikawa S, Takeda K, Awata T, Hanada H, Perry ACF. Pig cloning by microinjection of fetal fibroblast nuclei., 2000, 289(5482): 1188–1190.

[27] Chesné P, Adenot PG, Viglietta C, Baratte M, Boulanger L, Renard JP. Cloned rabbits produced by nuclear transfer from adult somatic cells., 2002, 20(4): 366–369.

[28] Shin T, Kraemer D, Pryor J, Liu L, Rugila J, Howe L, Buck S, Murphy K, Lyons L, Westhusin M. A cat cloned by nuclear transplantation., 2002, 415(6874): 859.

[29] Woods GL, White KL, Vanderwall DK, Li GP, Aston KI, Bunch TD, Meerdo LN, Pate BJ. A mule cloned from fetal cells by nuclear transfer., 2003, 301(5636): 1063.

[30] Galli C, Lagutina I, Crotti G, Colleoni S, Turini P, Ponderato N, Duchi R, Lazzari G. Pregnancy: a cloned horse born to its dam twin., 2003, 424(6949): 635.

[31] Zhou Q, Renard JP, Le Friec G, Brochard V, Beaujean N, Cherifi Y, Fraichard A, Cozzi J. Generation of fertile cloned rats by regulating oocyte activation., 2003, 302(5648): 1179.

[32] Lee BC, Kim MK, Jang G, Oh HJ, Yuda F, Kim HJ, Hossein MS, Kim JJ, Kang SK, Schatten G, Hwang WS. Dogs cloned from adult somatic cells., 2005, 436(7051): 641.

[33] Wani NA, Wernery U, Hassan FA, Wernery R, Skidmore JA. Production of the first cloned camel by somatic cell nuclear transfer., 2010, 82(2): 373–379.

[34] Liu Z, Cai Y, Wang Y, Nie Y, Zhang C, Xu Y, Zhang X, Lu Y, Wang Z, Poo M, Sun Q. Cloning of macaque monkeys by somatic cell nuclear transfer., 2018, 172(4): 881–887.e7.

[35] Tachibana M, Amato P, Sparman M, Gutierrez NM, Tippner-Hedges R, Ma H, Kang E, Fulati A, Lee HS, Sritanaudomchai H, Masterson K, Larson J, Eaton D, Sadler-Fredd K, Battaglia D, Lee D, Wu D, Jensen J, Patton P, Gokhale S, Stouffer RL, Wolf D, Mitalipov S. Human embryonic stem cells derived by somatic cell nuclear transfer., 2013, 153(6): 1228–1238.

[36] Chung YG, Matoba S, Liu Y, Eum JH, Lu F, Jiang W, Lee JE, Sepilian V, Cha KY, Lee DR, Zhang Y. Histone demethylase expression enhances human somatic cell nuclear transfer efficiency and promotes derivation of pluripotent stem cells., 2015, 17(6): 758–766.

[37] Yamada M, Johannesson B, Sagi I, Burnett LC, Kort DH, Prosser RW, Paull D, Nestor MW, Freeby M, Greenberg E, Goland RS, Leibel RL, Solomon SL, Benvenisty N, Sauer MV, Egli D. Human oocytes reprogram adult somatic nuclei of a type 1 diabetic to diploid pluripotent stem cells., 2014, 510(7506): 533–536.

[38] Wakayama T, Tabar V, Rodriguez I, Perry AC, Studer L, Mombaerts P. Differentiation of embryonic stem cell lines generated from adult somatic cells by nuclear transfer., 2001, 292(5517): 740–743.

[39] Rideout WM 3rd, Hochedlinger K, Kyba M, Daley GQ, Jaenisch R. Correction of a genetic defect by nuclear transplantation and combined cell and gene therapy., 2002, 109(1): 17–27.

[40] Byrne JA, Pedersen DA, Clepper LL, Nelson M, Sanger WG, Gokhale S, Wolf DP, Mitalipov SM. Producing primate embryonic stem cells by somatic cell nuclear transfer., 2007, 450(7169): 497–502.

[41] Chung YG, Eum JH, Lee JE, Shim SH, Sepilian V, Hong SW, Lee Y, Treff NR, Choi YH, Kimbrel EA, Dittman RE, Lanza R, Lee DR. Human somatic cell nuclear transfer using adult cells., 2014, 14(6): 777–780.

[42] Zhang J, Liu H, Luo S, Lu Z, Chávez-Badiola A, Liu Z, Yang M, Merhi Z, Silber SJ, Munné S, Konstantinidis M, Wells D, Tang JJ, Huang T. Live birth derived from oocyte spindle transfer to prevent mitochondrial disease., 2017, 34(4): 361–368.

[43] Lai L, Prather RS. Production of cloned pigs by using somatic cells as donors., 2003, 5(4): 233–241.

[44] Liu Y, Li J, L?vendahl P, Schmidt M, Larsen K, Callesen H. In vitro manipulation techniques of porcine embryos: a meta-analysis related to transfers, pregnancies and piglets., 2015, 27(3): 429–439.

[45] Ogura A, Inoue K, Wakayama T. Recent advancements in cloning by somatic cell nuclear transfer., 2013, 368(1609): 20110329.

[46] Ao Z, Liu DW, Cai GY, Wu ZF, Li ZC. Placental developmental defects in cloned mammalian animals., 2016, 38(5): 402–410.敖政, 劉德武, 蔡更元, 吳珍芳, 李紫聰. 克隆哺乳動物的胎盤發(fā)育缺陷. 遺傳, 2016, 38(5): 402–410.

[47] Loi P, Iuso D, Czernik M, Ogura A. A New, Dynamic era for somatic cell nuclear transfer?, 2016, 34(10): 791–797.

[48] Ao Z, Liu D, Zhao C, Yue Z, Shi J, Zhou R, Cai G, Zheng E, Li Z, Wu Z. Birth weight, umbilical and placental traits in relation to neonatal loss in cloned pigs., 2017, 57: 94–101.

[49] Oback B. Climbing mount efficiency--small steps, not giant leaps towards higher cloning success in farm animals., 2008, 43(s2): 407–416.

[50] Yang X, Smith SL, Tian XC, Lewin HA, Renard JP, Wakayama T. Nuclear reprogramming of cloned embryos and its implications for therapeutic cloning., 2007, 39(3): 295–302.

[51] Graves JAM. Sex chromosome specialization and degeneration in mammals., 2006, 124(5): 901–914.

[52] Sahakyan A, Yang Y, Plath K. The role of Xist in X-chromosome dosage compensation., 2018, 28(12): 999–1013.

[53] Furlan G, Rougeulle C. Function and evolution of the long noncoding RNA circuitry orchestrating X-chromo-some inactivation in mammals., 2016, 7(5): 702–722.

[54] Shin J, Bossenz M, Chung Y, Ma H, Byron M, Taniguchi-Ishigaki N, Zhu X, Jiao B, Hall LL, Green MR, Jones SN, Hermans-Borgmeyer I, Lawrence JB, Bach I. Maternal Rnf12/RLIM is required for imprinted X-chromosome inactivation in mice., 2010, 467(7318): 977–981.

[55] Payer B. Developmental regulation of X-chromosome inactivation., 2016, 56: 88–99.

[56] Moreira De Mello JC, De Araújo ES, Stabellini R, Fraga AM, De Souza JES, Sumita DR, Camargo AA, Pereira LV. Random X inactivation and extensive mosaicism in human placenta revealed by analysis of allele-specific gene expression along the X chromosome., 2010, 5(6): e10947.

[57] Zeng F, Huang ZH, Yuan YJ, Shi JS, Cai GY, Liu DW, Wu ZF, Li ZC. Effects of RNAi-mediated knockdown of Xist on the developmental efficiency of cloned male porcine embryos., 2016, 62(6): 591–597.

[58] Cao R, Wang L, Wang H, Xia L, Erdjument-Bromage H, Tempst P, Jones RS, Zhang Y. Role of histone H3 lysine 27 methylation in polycomb-group silencing., 2002, 298(5595): 1039–1043.

[59] Nora EP, Heard E. Chromatin structure and nuclear organization dynamics during X-chromosome inactivation., 2010, 75: 333–344.

[60] Fukuda A, Cao F, Morita S, Yamada K, Jincho Y, Tane S, Sotomaru Y, Kono T. Identification of inappropriately reprogrammed genes by large-scale transcriptome analysis of individual cloned mouse blastocysts., 2010, 5(6): e11274.

[61] Yuan L, Wang AF, Yao CG, Huang YY, Duan FF, Lv QY, Wang DX, Ouyang HS, Li ZJ, Lai LX. Aberrant expression of Xist in aborted porcine fetuses derived from somatic cell nuclear transfer embryos., 2014, 15(12): 21631–21643.

[62] Chen XY, Zhu ZW, Yu FX, Huang J, Jia RX, Pan JZ. Effect of shRNA-mediated Xist knockdown on the quality of porcine parthenogenetic embryos., 2019, 248(1): 140–148.

[63] Yang Y, Wu D, Liu D, Shi J, Zhou R, He X, Quan J, Cai G, Zheng E, Wu Z, Li Z. Mutation of the XIST gene upregulates expression of X-linked genes but decreases the developmental rates of cloned male porcine embryos., 2017, 84(6): 525–534.

[64] Ruan D, Peng J, Wang X, Ouyang Z, Zou Q, Yang Y, Chen F, Ge W, Wu H, Liu Z, Zhao Y, Zhao B, Zhang Q, Lai C, Fan N, Zhou Z, Liu Q, Li N, Jin Q, Shi H, Xie J, Song H, Yang X, Chen J, Wang K, Li X, Lai L. XIST derepression in active X chromosome hinders pig somatic cell nuclear transfer., 2018, 10(2): 494–508.

[65] Sulewska A, Niklinska W, Kozlowski M, Minarowski L, Naumnik W, Niklinski J, Dabrowska K, Chyczewski L. DNA methylation in states of cell physiology and pathology., 2007, 45(3): 149–158.

[66] Guo L, Li H, Han ZM. Effect of DNA methylation and histone modification during the de-velopment of cloned animals., 2010, 32(8): 762–768.郭磊, 李慧, 韓之明. DNA甲基化和組蛋白修飾在克隆動物發(fā)育過程中的作用. 遺傳, 2010, 32(8): 762–768.

[67] Song HW, An TZ, Piao SH, Wang CS. Mammalian DNA methylation and its roles during the induced re-programming of somatic cells., 2014, 36(5): 431–438.宋紅衛(wèi), 安鐵洙, 樸善花, 王春生. 哺乳動物DNA甲基化及其在體細胞誘導重編程中的作用. 遺傳, 2014, 36(5): 431–438.

[68] Deng DJ. DNA methylation and demethylation: current status and future per-spective., 2014, 36(5): 403–410.鄧大君. DNA甲基化和去甲基化的研究現(xiàn)狀及思考. 遺傳, 2014, 36(5): 403–410.

[69] Wu X, Zhang Y. TET-mediated active DNA demethylation: mechanism, function and beyond., 2017, 18(9): 517–534.

[70] Mayer W, Niveleau A, Walter J, Fundele R, Haaf T. Demethylation of the zygotic paternal genome., 2000, 403(6769): 501–502.

[71] Simonsson S, Gurdon J. DNA demethylation is necessary for the epigenetic reprogramming of somatic cell nuclei., 2004, 6(10): 984–990.

[72] Zhang Y, Charlton J, Karnik R, Beerman I, Smith ZD, Gu H, Boyle P, Mi X, Clement K, Pop R, Gnirke A, Rossi DJ, Meissner A. Targets and genomic constraints of ectopic Dnmt3b expression., 2018, 7: pii: e40757.

[73] Inoue A, Zhang Y. Replication-dependent loss of 5-hydroxymethylcytosine in mouse preimplantation embryos., 2011, 334(6053): 194.

[74] Matoba S, Wang H, Jiang L, Lu F, Iwabuchi KA, Wu X, Inoue K, Yang L, Press W, Lee JT, Ogura A, Shen L, Zhang Y. Loss of H3K27me3 imprinting in somatic cell nuclear transfer embryos disrupts post-implantation development., 2018, 23(3): 343– 354.e345.

[75] Gao R, Wang C, Gao Y, Xiu W, Chen J, Kou X, Zhao Y, Liao Y, Bai D, Qiao Z, Yang L, Wang M, Zang R, Liu X, Jia Y, Li Y, Zhang Y, Yin J, Wang H, Wan X, Liu W, Zhang Y, Gao S. Inhibition of aberrant DNA re-methylation improves post-implantation development of somatic cell nuclear transfer embryos., 2018, 23(3): 426–435.e425.

[76] Johnstone RW. Histone-deacetylase inhibitors: novel drugs for the treatment of cancer., 2002, 1(4): 287–299.

[77] Ji HL, Lu SS, Pan DK. Epigenetic reprogramming by somatic cell nuclear transfer: questions and potential solutions., 2014, 36(12): 1211–1218.紀慧麗, 盧晟盛, 潘登科. 體細胞核移植后表觀遺傳重編程的異常及其修復. 遺傳, 2014, 36(12): 1211–1218.

[78] Kishigami S, Mizutani E, Ohta H, Hikichi T, Thuan NV, Wakayama S, Bui HT, Wakayama T. Significant improvement of mouse cloning technique by treatment with trichostatin a after somatic nuclear transfer., 2006, 340(1): 183–189.

[79] Rybouchkin A, Kato Y, Tsunoda Y. Role of histone acetylation in reprogramming of somatic nuclei following nuclear transfer., 2006, 74(6): 1083–1089.

[80] Inoue K, Oikawa M, Kamimura S, Ogonuki N, NakamuraT, Nakano T, Abe K, Ogura A. Trichostatin a specifically improves the aberrant expression of transcription factor genes in embryos produced by somatic cell nuclear transfer., 2015, 5: 10127.

[81] Bohrer RC, Duggavathi R, Bordignon V. Inhibition of histone deacetylases enhances DNA damage repair in SCNT embryos., 2014, 13(13): 2138–2148.

[82] Jin JX, Kang JD, Li S, Jin L, Zhu HY, Guo Q, Gao QS, Yan CG, Yin XJ. PXD101 significantly improves nuclear reprogramming and the in vitro developmental competence of porcine SCNT embryos., 2015, 456(1): 156–161.

[83] Akagi S, Matsukawa K, Mizutani E, Fukunari K, Kaneda M, Watanabe S, Takahashi S. Treatment with a histone deacetylase inhibitor after nuclear transfer improves the preimplantation development of cloned bovine embryos., 2011, 57(1): 120–126.

[84] Li X, Ao X, Bai L, Li D, Liu X, Wei Z, Bou S, Li G. VPA selectively regulates pluripotency gene expression on donor cell and improve SCNT embryo development., 2018, 54(7): 496–504.

[85] Song BS, Yoon SB, Sim BW, Kim YH, Cha JJ, Choi SA, Jeong KJ, Kim JS, Huh JW, Lee SR, Kim SH, Kim SU, Chang KT. Valproic acid enhances early development of bovine somatic cell nuclear transfer embryos by alleviating endoplasmic reticulum stress., 2014, 26(3): 432–440.

[86] Zhao J, Hao Y, Ross JW, Spate LD, Walters EM, Samuel MS, Rieke A, Murphy CN, Prather RS. Histone deacetylase inhibitors improve in vitro and in vivo developmental competence of somatic cell nuclear transfer porcine embryos., 2010, 12(1): 75–83.

[87] Martinez-Diaz MA, Che L, Albornoz M, Seneda MM, Collis D, Coutinho AR, El-Beirouthi N, Laurin D, Zhao X, Bordignon V. Pre-and postimplantation development of swine-cloned embryos derived from fibroblasts and bone marrow cells after inhibition of histone deacetylases., 2010, 12(1): 85–94.

[88] Wang C, Liu X, Gao Y, Yang L, Li C, Liu W, Chen C, Kou X, Zhao Y, Chen J, Wang Y, Le R, Wang H, Duan T, Zhang Y, Gao S. Reprogramming of H3K9me3-dependentheterochromatin during mammalian embryo development., 2018, 20(5): 620–631.

[89] Djekidel MN, Inoue A, Matoba S, Suzuki T, Zhang CX, Lu FL, Jiang L, Zhang Y. Reprogramming of chromatin accessibility in somatic cell nuclear transfer is DNA replication independent., 2018, 23(7): 1939– 1947.

[90] Liu X, Wang Y, Gao Y, Su J, Zhang J, Xing X, Zhou C, Yao K, An Q, Zhang Y. H3K9 demethylase KDM4E is an epigenetic regulator for bovine embryonic development and a defective factor for nuclear reprogramming., 2018, 145(4), pii: dev158261.

[91] Hang XW, Cheng XR, Wang N, Zhang YW, Liao C, Jin LH, Lei L. Histone variant H3.3 and its functions in reprogramming., 2018, 40(3): 186– 196.黃星衛(wèi), 程香榮, 王楠, 張雨薇, 廖辰, 金連弘, 雷蕾. 組蛋白H3變體H3.3及其在細胞重編程中的作用. 遺傳, 2018, 40(3): 186–196.

[92] Inoue A, Jiang L, Lu F, Suzuki T, Zhang Y. Maternal H3K27me3 controls DNA methylation-independent imprinting., 2017, 547(7664): 419–424.

[93] Inoue A, Jiang L, Lu F, Zhang Y. Genomic imprinting of Xist by maternal H3K27me3., 2017, 31(19): 1927–1932.

[94] Keefer CL. Lessons learned from nuclear transfer (cloning)., 2008, 69(1): 48–54.

[95] Bai GY, Song SH, Zhang YW, Huang X, Huang XW, Sun RZ, Lei L. Kdm6a overexpression improves the development of cloned mouse embryos., 2018, 26(1): 24–32.

[96] K L, Chen YJ, Gao SR. Historical review of reprogramming and pluripotent stem cell research in China., 2018, 40(10): 825–840.康嵐, 陳嘉瑜, 高紹榮. 中國細胞重編程和多能干細胞研究進展. 遺傳, 2018, 40(10): 825–840.

[97] Lu F, Liu Y, Inoue A, Suzuki T, Zhao K, Zhang Y. Establishing chromatin regulatory landscape during mouse preimplantation development., 2016, 165(6): 1375–1388.

[98] Ke Y, Xu Y, Chen X, Feng S, Liu Z, Sun Y, Yao X, Li F, Zhu W, Gao L, Chen H, Du Z, Xie W, Xu X, Huang X, Liu J. 3D chromatin structures of mature gametes and structural reprogramming during mammalian embryoge-nesis., 2017, 170(2): 367–381.e320.

[99] Cheloufi S, Elling U, Hopfgartner B, Jung YL, Murn J, Ninova M, Hubmann M, Badeaux AI, Euong Ang C, Tenen D, Wesche DJ, Abazova N, Hogue M, Tasdemir N, Brumbaugh J, Rathert P, Jude J, Ferrari F, Blanco A, Fellner M, Wenzel D, Zinner M, Vidal SE, Bell O, Stadtfeld M, Chang HY, Almouzni G, Lowe SW, Rinn J, Wernig M, Aravin A, Shi Y, Park PJ, Penninger JM, Zuber J, Hochedlinger K. The histone chaperone CAF-1 safeguards somatic cell identity., 2015, 528(7581): 218–224.

[100] Soufi A, Donahue G, Zaret KS. Facilitators and impediments of the pluripotency reprogramming factors' initial engagement with the genome., 2012, 151(5): 994–1004.

[101] Sridharan R, Gonzales-Cope M, Chronis C, Bonora G, Mckee R, Huang CY, Patel S, Lopez D, Mishra N, Pellegrini M, Carey M, Garcia BA, Plath K. Proteomic and genomic approaches reveal critical functions of H3K9 methylation and heterochromatin protein-1γ in reprogramming to pluripotency., 2013, 15(7): 872–882.

[102] Okae H, Matoba S, Nagashima T, Mizutani E, Inoue K, Ogonuki N, Chiba H, Funayama R, Tanaka S, Yaegashi N, Nakayama K, Sasaki H, Ogura A, Arima T. RNA sequencing-based identification of aberrant imprinting in cloned mice., 2014, 23(4): 992– 1001.

[103] Schiebinger G, Shu J, Tabaka M, Cleary B, Subramanian V, Solomon A, Gould J, Liu S, Lin S, Berube P, Lee L, Chen J, Brumbaugh J, Rigollet P, Hochedlinger K, Jaenisch R, Regev A, Lander ES. Optimal-transport asnalysis of single-cell gene expression identifies developmental trajectories in reprogramming., 2019, 176(4): 928–943.e922.

[104] Fan ZQ, Yang M, Regouski M, Polejaeva IA. Gene knockouts in goats using CRISPR/Cas9 system and somatic cell nuclear transfer., 2019, 1874: 373–390.

[105] Sander JD, Joung JK. CRISPR-Cas systems for editing, regulating and targeting genomes., 2014, 32(4): 347–355.

Advances in epigenetic reprogramming of somatic cells nuclear transfer in mammals

Xuqiong Yang, Zhenfang Wu, Zicong Li

Somatic cell nuclear transfer (SCNT) is the only reproductive engineering technique that can confer genomic totipotency on somatic cell. SCNT is of great significance for animal germplasm conservation, animal husbandry development, and biomedical research. Although many research advances have been made in this technology, the developmental rate of SCNT mammalian embryos is very low, which seriously limits the application of SCNT in animal husbandry and biomedicine. The primary reason for the low efficiency of cloned embryos is somatic cell reprogramming errors or incomplete reprogramming. These errors or incompleteness present as the abnormal expression of imprinted gene, abnormal DNA methylation, and abnormal histone modification. In this review, we summarize the main factors that influence the low development efficiency of mammalian cloned embryos to provide theoretical reference for the research and practice of improving somatic cell cloning efficiency.

somatic cell nuclear transfer (SCNT);; DNA methylation; histone modification

2019-07-03;

2019-10-07

國家自然科學基金面上項目(編號：31772554)資助[Supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China(No. 31772554)

楊旭瓊，碩士研究生，專業(yè)方向：動物遺傳育種與繁殖。E-mail: 1814639793@qq.com

李紫聰，教授，博士生導師，研究方向：動物遺傳育種與繁殖。E-mail: lizicongcong@163.com

10.16288/j.yczz.19-193

2019/11/19 13:16:00

URI: http://kns.cnki.net/kcms/detail/11.1913.r.20191118.1633.002.html

(責任編委: 高紹榮)