• 
    

    
    

      99热精品在线国产_美女午夜性视频免费_国产精品国产高清国产av_av欧美777_自拍偷自拍亚洲精品老妇_亚洲熟女精品中文字幕_www日本黄色视频网_国产精品野战在线观看

      ?

      The Research on Classroom Questioning in Senior High School Under Constructive Theory

      2020-10-14 09:10:31楊江青
      青年生活 2020年31期
      關(guān)鍵詞:華東師范大學(xué)出版社江青微格

      楊江青

      Abstract: This paper mainly uses constructive theory to analyze classroom questioning in senior high school. The results shows that referential questions are of great importance. But referential questions and display questions are supposed to complement each other.

      Key words: senior high school; English teaching; classroom questioning

      1. Introduction

      Constructive theory emphasizes subjective understanding and meaningful construction, concerns initiative, sociality, and context, and opposes to impart ready knowledge simply.

      2. The Demands of Constructivism on Teachers

      The medium roles of teachers Teachers help students to make rational use of various resources, guide students to absorb the required knowledge, stimulate students' interest. The medium roles of teachers are to help students solve problems and reach goals by language in classroom.

      Teacher's classroom discourse? As Nunan said: in the process of foreign language and second language acquisition, teacher's discourse is crucial to both the organization of classroom teaching and students' language acquisition. An important type of teacher discourse is questioning. Teachers can not only engage students in communication by asking questions, but also urge students to adjust their language to make it more understandable.

      3. Research Design

      Research participants: students from four classes of Changle No.1 middle school: Unit 1 Friendship. Research methods: classroom observation

      4. Results and Discussion

      Teachers are randomly invited to attend the class. According to the recording, the time occupied by teacher's discourse and student's discourse in six classes and the proportion occupied in one class are counted respectively.

      From Figure 1, it indicates that the discourse volume of middle school students in six classes is above 60%. Among them, the amount of students' discourse in four classes is more than 30 minutes, which shows the students' learning subjectivity.

      Figure2 indicates that although there are great differences in the number of teachers' questions, there is basically a common feature: except for class 1 and class 3, the other 4 class reference questions are nearly the display questions, accounting for 60%-83% of the total number of questions. The number of referential questions in class 1 and 3 is also between 40% and 50%.

      By linking the two charts and comparing the results with the suggestions made by many scholars, teachers should use more referential questions in order to create more communication in class. However, in the specific class, the referential questions may be less than the display questions, while the proportion of discourse output of students in class can still be large, such as 81% in class 1 and 71% in class 3.

      Referential questions, display questions and student knowledge construction. In class 1, Teachers ask students to make presentations in each class, and students make their own PPT to visualize them. In this class, a student gives a detailed description of PUKA, a popular cartoon character among students. After that, the teacher asks the students to discuss it.

      From the transcript, teacher first put forward two referential questions: Why do you like it? Why does PUKA products popular among students? Each student can answer these two questions according to his understanding and experience. The following three students take an active part in the class from different aspects. After asking questions, teachers can get feedback quickly from students. They use display questions to encourage students to answer questions. Does anyone want to answer this question? I do want to know your opinion, anyone volunteers? Teachers encourage students to answer questions and make appropriate evaluation of students' questions.

      5. Conclusion

      During the process of helping students knowledge construction, teachers' language plays a mediating role. Teacher's question is of great importance. In the high schools English teaching, which takes the students as the main body, referential question is essential. In the specific teaching process, teachers should combine the classroom practice, use constructivism as the guidance, skillfully combine the two kinds of questions in order to cultivate students' creative thinking, reasonably create a learning environment for constructing knowledge, and give full play to students' intellectual potential and creative ability.

      References:

      [1]Harmer,Jeremy.1998.How to Teach English[M].London:Addison Wesley,2014.

      [2]榮靜嫻.微格教學(xué)與微格研究[M].上海:華東師范大學(xué)出版社,2000.

      猜你喜歡
      華東師范大學(xué)出版社江青微格
      毛澤東幫江青改文章
      世紀(jì)(2020年2期)2020-06-04 09:48:57
      “天使設(shè)計(jì)的建筑”
      少兒科技(2019年8期)2019-09-10 07:22:44
      Instructional Design for Teaching English as a Foreign Language
      On Obstacles of English Reading Comprehension to Senior High School Students and Reading Strategies
      The Beauty of Painting in English Writing
      “三位一體”微格教學(xué)輔助說(shuō)課的模式
      微格教學(xué)法在小學(xué)英語(yǔ)課堂中的運(yùn)用
      新教育(2015年20期)2015-12-20 09:28:42
      作文訓(xùn)練微格化、序列化初探
      微格教學(xué)法在《軍事醫(yī)學(xué)地理學(xué)》教學(xué)中的實(shí)踐與應(yīng)用
      江青破碎的“國(guó)服夢(mèng)”
      晚晴(2014年5期)2014-06-25 16:04:51
      洮南市| 扬中市| 巴东县| 四平市| 沙洋县| 巨野县| 翁源县| 崇礼县| 洞口县| 同德县| 富阳市| 秀山| 大荔县| 寿光市| 东兴市| 青神县| 丹棱县| 金山区| 城步| 安泽县| 星子县| 连江县| 普定县| 牡丹江市| 普兰县| 遵化市| 台北市| 象州县| 古交市| 佛冈县| 临沂市| 互助| 赤水市| 大冶市| 合作市| 阜城县| 丹东市| 舟山市| 若尔盖县| 攀枝花市| 吉隆县|