• 
    

    
    

      99热精品在线国产_美女午夜性视频免费_国产精品国产高清国产av_av欧美777_自拍偷自拍亚洲精品老妇_亚洲熟女精品中文字幕_www日本黄色视频网_国产精品野战在线观看

      ?

      凡納濱對(duì)蝦進(jìn)口親蝦子一代群體的遺傳變異分析

      2021-03-05 20:47:41徐煜黃小帥胡曉娟徐武杰蘇浩昌文國樑曹煜成楊鏗
      關(guān)鍵詞:遺傳變異

      徐煜 黃小帥 胡曉娟 徐武杰 蘇浩昌 文國樑 曹煜成 楊鏗

      摘要:【目的】明確凡納濱對(duì)蝦(Litopenaeus vannamei)進(jìn)口親蝦直接繁殖子一代種苗群體的遺傳變異情況,旨在評(píng)估遺傳特征與養(yǎng)殖生產(chǎn)性能的關(guān)聯(lián)性,為我國養(yǎng)殖對(duì)蝦優(yōu)質(zhì)種苗大數(shù)據(jù)建設(shè)及質(zhì)量評(píng)估體系的完善提供基礎(chǔ)數(shù)據(jù)支持?!痉椒ā恳詠碓从谡笊駷澄r苗場(chǎng)的Stock 1~Stock 5群體、正大漳浦蝦苗場(chǎng)的Stock 6群體、海尚種苗培育基地的Stock 7和Stock 8群體及中海水產(chǎn)種苗科技有限公司的Stock 9群體等9個(gè)不同批次凡納濱對(duì)蝦進(jìn)口親蝦子一代種苗為研究對(duì)象,利用11個(gè)微衛(wèi)星分子標(biāo)記(M1、Pvan1758、Pvan1815、HLJN-008、HLJN-023、TUMXLv7.121、TUMXLv8.256、TUMXLv9.43、TUMXLv10.312、TUYFLvL16.1a和TUDGLv1-3.224)對(duì)不同凡納濱對(duì)蝦種苗群體進(jìn)行遺傳變異分析?!窘Y(jié)果】9個(gè)凡納濱對(duì)蝦種苗群體的等位基因數(shù)(Na)、有效等位基因數(shù)(Ne)、觀測(cè)雜合度(Ho)、期望雜合度(He)、Shannon’s信息指數(shù)(I)和多態(tài)信息含量(PIC)的平均值分別在5.5455~8.8182、3.2795~5.4735、0.3769~0.5182、0.6189~0.6948、1.2823~1.6092和0.5863~0.6646,即各凡納濱對(duì)蝦種苗群體均具有較高的遺傳多樣性,具體排序?yàn)镾tock 3>Stock 2>Stock 4>Stock 5>Stock 7>Stock 6>Stock 9>Stock 8>Stock 1。在9個(gè)凡納濱對(duì)蝦種苗群體中有91.82%的遺傳變異源自群體內(nèi),僅有8.18%的變異源自群體間。Stock 2、Stock 3、Stock 4和Stock 5等4個(gè)群體間及Stock 7群體與Stock 8群體間的遺傳分化系數(shù)(Fst)均小于0.05(0.0079~0.0371),即群體間無遺傳分化,而其他群體間表現(xiàn)為輕度遺傳分化(0.05<Fst <0.15)?;贜ei’s遺傳距離,9個(gè)凡納濱對(duì)蝦種苗群體大致可劃分為三大分支,第一分支包括Stock 1~Stock 6群體,第二分支由Stock 7群體和Stock 8群體組成,而Stock 9群體獨(dú)立為第三分支?!窘Y(jié)論】不同批次凡納濱對(duì)蝦進(jìn)口親蝦子一代種苗群體的遺傳特征存在明顯差異,各群體間的遺傳距離隨著采樣時(shí)間和地點(diǎn)的改變而發(fā)生明顯變化,且這些遺傳背景差異可能會(huì)造成不同群體在養(yǎng)殖生產(chǎn)性能方面產(chǎn)生差異。

      關(guān)鍵詞: 凡納濱對(duì)蝦;進(jìn)口親蝦;子一代群體;遺傳變異;微衛(wèi)星分子標(biāo)記

      中圖分類號(hào): S945.49? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?文獻(xiàn)標(biāo)志碼: A 文章編號(hào):2095-1191(2021)11-3139-08

      Genetic variation analysis among first filial generation of introduced Litopenaeus vannamei stocks

      XU Yu1,2, HUANG Xiao-shuai1, HU Xiao-juan1,2, XU Wu-jie1,2, SU Hao-chang1,2,

      WEN Guo-liang1, CAO Yu-cheng1,2*, YANG Keng1*

      (1South China Sea Fisheries Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Fishery Sciences/Key Laboratory of South China Sea Fishery Resources Exploitation & Utilization, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs/Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Fishery Ecology and Environment, Guangzhou? 510300, China; 2 Shenzhen Base of South China Sea Fisheries Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Fishery Sciences, Shenzhen, Guangdong? 518121, China)

      Abstract:【Objective】The main purpose of this study was to analyze and assess the genetic diversity of first filial ge-neration of Litopenaeus vannamei, in order to evaluate the correlation between its genetic characteristics and aquaculture production performance, and provide basic data support for the big data construction and establishment of quality evaluation system of high-quality post-larvae in China. 【Method】The objects were L. vannamei Stock 1-Stock 5 from Zhengda Shenwan shrimp larvae farm, Stock 6 from Zhengda Zhangpu shrimp larvae farm, Stock 7 and Stock 8 from Haishang shrimp larvae farm, Stock 9 from Zhonghai aquatic larvae culture company. The genetic variation of nine first filial gene-ration stocks were investigated using eleven microsatellite DNA markers(M1, Pvan1758, Pvan1815, HLJN-008, HLJN-023, TUMXLv7.121, TUMXLv8.256, TUMXLv9.43, TUMXLv10.312, TUYFLvL16.1a and TUDGLv1-3.224). 【Result】This paper showed that the average values of the number of alleles (Na), number of effective alleles (Ne), observed heterozygosity (Ho), expected heterozygosity (He), Shannon’s diversity index (I), and polymorphism information content (PIC) were among 5.5455-8.8182, 3.2795-5.4735, 0.3769-0.5182, 0.6189-0.6948, 1.2823-1.6092 and 0.5863-0.6646, respectively. That presented a high genetic diversity of these filial generation of introduced L. vannamei stocks, and according to the richness, they ranked as follows: Stock 3>Stock 2>Stock 4>Stock 5>Stock 7>Stock 6>Stock 9>Stock 8>Stock 1. AMOVA analysis indicated that the genetic variation within stock was 91.82% and the remaining 8.18% of the variation occurred among stocks. The genetic differentiation among Stocks 2-5 and among Stocks 7-8 showed a low level based on their Fst values (0.0079-0.0371), which were lower than 0.05, whereas the other stocks had no genetic differentiation (0.05<Fst <0.15). Based on Nei’s genetic distance, the nine stocks could be roughly divided into three branches: the first branch including Stock 1 - Stock 6 stocks, the second branch being composed of Stock 7 and Stock 8, and the third branch only included Stock 9. 【Conclusion】These findings indicated that different batches of first filial generations have distinct genetic characteristics. Dramatically, genetic distance of first filial generations are clearly fluctuated with the breeding farm and breeding time. Changes of genetic background might directly affect the shrimp traits in subsequent farming.

      Key words: Litopenaeus vannamei; exotic parents; first filial generation; genetic variation; microsatellite molecular marker

      Foundation item: Central Public-interest Scientific Institution Basal Research Fund of Chinese Academy of Fishery Sciences(2020TD54); China Agriculture Research System of MOF and MARA(CARS-48); Guangdong Provincial Special Fund for Modern Agriculture Industry Technology Innovation Teams (2019KJ149)

      0 引言

      【研究意義】凡納濱對(duì)蝦(Litopenaeus vannamei)又稱南美白對(duì)蝦,隸屬于十足目(Decapoda)游泳亞目(Natantia)對(duì)蝦科(Penaeidae),是當(dāng)今最主要的對(duì)蝦養(yǎng)殖品種。凡納濱對(duì)蝦自1988年引入后逐步發(fā)展成為我國對(duì)蝦養(yǎng)殖產(chǎn)業(yè)的主導(dǎo)品種,近年來我國的凡納濱對(duì)蝦養(yǎng)殖產(chǎn)量穩(wěn)居世界首位(代平等,2018)。凡納濱對(duì)蝦為熱帶型種類,原產(chǎn)自中南美洲太平洋沿岸水域,其優(yōu)良種質(zhì)資源長期受到國外育種機(jī)構(gòu)的壟斷(王興強(qiáng)等,2004;代平等,2018;彭敏等,2020)。當(dāng)前全球凡納濱對(duì)蝦種蝦資源主要分布在美國的夏威夷、邁阿密和關(guān)島,以及泰國、新加坡和印尼,我國每年需從境外進(jìn)口大量親蝦,由進(jìn)口親蝦直接繁育子一代種苗具有生長速度快、養(yǎng)成群體個(gè)頭均勻等優(yōu)點(diǎn),在我國對(duì)蝦養(yǎng)殖業(yè)中占有較高的市場(chǎng)份額。但受種質(zhì)資源退化及養(yǎng)殖環(huán)境惡化等因素的影響,對(duì)蝦養(yǎng)殖業(yè)面臨病害頻發(fā)、養(yǎng)殖風(fēng)險(xiǎn)劇增等突出問題(王麗花等,2012;文國樑等,2015;Qiu et al.,2017)。從不同批次進(jìn)口親蝦子一代種苗的養(yǎng)殖實(shí)踐來看,蝦苗的成活率、抗逆性及生長周期等表現(xiàn)良莠不齊,嚴(yán)重影響了養(yǎng)殖經(jīng)濟(jì)效益。因此,針對(duì)凡納濱對(duì)蝦進(jìn)口親蝦直接繁殖子一代種苗群體開展遺傳變異分析,對(duì)評(píng)估其遺傳特征與養(yǎng)殖生產(chǎn)性能的關(guān)聯(lián)性具有重要意義?!厩叭搜芯窟M(jìn)展】微衛(wèi)星分子標(biāo)記分析具有簡便、快捷及穩(wěn)定性好等優(yōu)點(diǎn),已廣泛應(yīng)用于種質(zhì)資源評(píng)價(jià)和遺傳育種等研究領(lǐng)域(孫效文等,2008;趙志英等,2018;周大顏等,2019)。近年來,微衛(wèi)星分子標(biāo)記也常應(yīng)用于水生生物遺傳多樣性分析。劉連為等(2014)利用8個(gè)微衛(wèi)星位點(diǎn)對(duì)北太平洋柔魚(Ommastrephes bartramii)的6個(gè)群體進(jìn)行分析,結(jié)果發(fā)現(xiàn)群體間具有較高的遺傳多樣性。毛守康等(2016)利用14個(gè)微衛(wèi)星位點(diǎn)對(duì)4個(gè)野生梭魚(Liza haematocheila)地理群體進(jìn)行遺傳多樣性分析,結(jié)果表明,4個(gè)群體遺傳多樣性處于中等多態(tài)水平,且按其地理位置由北向南依次聚為一類。Wang等(2016)利用8個(gè)微衛(wèi)星位點(diǎn)分析中國對(duì)蝦親本和回捕群體的遺傳多樣性,發(fā)現(xiàn)這2個(gè)種群擁有豐富遺傳多樣性,但存在較高程度的近親繁殖,且在中國對(duì)蝦種群中呈現(xiàn)一定的近交衰退。黃小芳等(2020)利用8對(duì)微衛(wèi)星引物對(duì)廣西不同地區(qū)克氏原螯蝦群體的遺傳多樣性進(jìn)行分析,結(jié)果發(fā)現(xiàn)各克氏原螯蝦群體具有一定的遺傳多樣性,但其雜合子缺失現(xiàn)象普遍存在,應(yīng)通過適當(dāng)引種及加強(qiáng)不同地區(qū)群體間的基因交流,保護(hù)好優(yōu)良種質(zhì)資源。在凡納濱對(duì)蝦方面,童馨等(2007,2009)在研究不同世代凡納濱對(duì)蝦養(yǎng)殖群體生長性狀變異的基礎(chǔ)上,利用微衛(wèi)星分子標(biāo)記分析種群遺傳多樣性的變化,發(fā)現(xiàn)隨著繁育世代增加,凡納濱對(duì)蝦的生長性狀逐代分化,生長速度變緩,群體遺傳多樣性降低,種質(zhì)發(fā)生退化;吳怡迪等(2016)基于微衛(wèi)星分子標(biāo)記對(duì)凡納濱對(duì)蝦選育系間雜交的生長性狀及遺傳多樣性進(jìn)行分析,結(jié)果表明,凡納濱對(duì)蝦的生長性能與群體遺傳多樣性水平呈顯著正相關(guān),選育系間雜交可使雜交后代的生長性狀和遺傳多樣性水平得到改善;李強(qiáng)勇等(2020)基于第三代高通量測(cè)序技術(shù)——單分子實(shí)時(shí)(SMRT)測(cè)序開發(fā)出凡納濱對(duì)蝦微衛(wèi)星分子標(biāo)記,有助于開展凡納濱對(duì)蝦遺傳育種研究工作;彭敏等(2020)從GenBank中篩選11對(duì)能有效擴(kuò)增的微衛(wèi)星引物對(duì)2016—2018年桂海1號(hào)凡納濱對(duì)蝦連續(xù)3個(gè)世代選育群體進(jìn)行遺傳多樣性分析,監(jiān)測(cè)相鄰2個(gè)世代選育群體間的遺傳變異情況,結(jié)果顯示桂海1號(hào)凡納濱對(duì)蝦各世代選育群體尚具有較豐富的遺傳變異,但群體遺傳結(jié)構(gòu)處于不穩(wěn)定狀態(tài)。【本研究切入點(diǎn)】遺傳變異是影響對(duì)蝦養(yǎng)殖性能表現(xiàn)的重要因素,但近年來鮮見從遺傳變異水平研究進(jìn)口親蝦子一代種苗養(yǎng)殖性能差異的問題?!緮M解決的關(guān)鍵問題】選取不同批次凡納濱對(duì)蝦進(jìn)口親蝦子一代種苗群體,利用微衛(wèi)星分子標(biāo)記分析不同群體的遺傳變異及其多樣性水平,旨在評(píng)估遺傳特征與養(yǎng)殖生產(chǎn)性能的關(guān)聯(lián)性,為我國養(yǎng)殖對(duì)蝦優(yōu)質(zhì)種苗大數(shù)據(jù)建設(shè)及質(zhì)量評(píng)估體系的完善提供基礎(chǔ)數(shù)據(jù)支持。

      1 材料與方法

      1. 1 試驗(yàn)材料

      供試凡納濱對(duì)蝦種苗群體為2017—2018年收集于廣東中山、茂名、汕尾及福建漳州等地的蝦苗場(chǎng)或養(yǎng)殖場(chǎng),共9個(gè)群體,分別命名為Stock 1~Stock 9。各凡納濱對(duì)蝦種苗群體樣品具體信息如表1所示。

      1. 2 DNA提取

      取凡納濱對(duì)蝦種苗腹部組織10~30 mg,參照E.Z.N.A. Tissue DNA Kit (OMEGA Bio-tek)試劑盒說明提取各樣品基因組DNA。采用1.0%瓊脂糖凝膠電泳檢測(cè)DNA完整性,以NanoDrop 2000紫外分光光度計(jì)測(cè)定其濃度,-80 ℃保存?zhèn)溆谩?/p>

      1. 3 微衛(wèi)星位點(diǎn)

      根據(jù)相關(guān)文獻(xiàn)報(bào)道,選取凡納濱對(duì)蝦中多態(tài)性高且擴(kuò)增效果好的11個(gè)微衛(wèi)星位點(diǎn):M1(Garcia et al.,1996;Alcivar-Warren et al.,2007a)、Pvan1758(Cruz et al.,2002)、Pvan1815(Cruz et al.,2002)、HLJN-008(Jia et al.,2006)、HLJN-023(Jia et al.,2006)、TUMXLv7.121(Meehan et al.,2003)、TUMX Lv8.256(Meehan et al.,2003;Alcivar-Warren et al.,2007b)、TUMXLv9.43(Meehan et al.,2003;Alcivar-Warren et al.,2007b)、TUMXLv10.312(Meehan et al.,2003;Alcivar-Warren et al.,2007b)、TUYFLvL16.1a(Alcivar-Warren et al.,2007b)和TUDGLv1-3.224(Alcivar-Warren et al.,2007b;Garcia et al.,2007),在各位點(diǎn)上游引物5'端分別進(jìn)行6-FAM、ROX、HEX或TAMRA熒光標(biāo)記,引物序列及熒光標(biāo)記類型詳見表2,并委托北京睿博興科生物技術(shù)有限公司合成。

      1. 4 PCR擴(kuò)增及產(chǎn)物檢測(cè)

      PCR反應(yīng)體系15.0 μL:DNA模板(50 ng/μL)1.0 μL,Premix TaqTM Mix(TaKaRa)7.5 μL,上、下游引物(0.5 μmol/L)各0.5 μL,雙蒸水5.5 μL。擴(kuò)增程序:95 ℃預(yù)變性3 min;95 ℃ 30 s,50 ℃ 30 s,72 ℃ 20 s,進(jìn)行32個(gè)循環(huán);72 ℃延伸6 min。以1.0%瓊脂糖凝膠電泳檢測(cè)PCR擴(kuò)增產(chǎn)物,并委托北京睿博興科生物技術(shù)有限公司,根據(jù)產(chǎn)物熒光特性進(jìn)行毛細(xì)管電泳混檢,測(cè)序結(jié)果使用Gene Marker 2.2.0讀取。

      1. 5 數(shù)據(jù)分析

      根據(jù)各凡納濱對(duì)蝦種苗群體在各微衛(wèi)星位點(diǎn)的基因型,利用GENE Stock 1.32進(jìn)行統(tǒng)計(jì)分析(Yeh and Boyle,1997),計(jì)算各微衛(wèi)星位點(diǎn)的等位基因數(shù)(Na)、有效等位基因數(shù)(Ne)、觀測(cè)雜合度(Ho)、期望雜合度(He)、Shannon’s信息指數(shù)(I)及Nei’s遺傳距離;采用PIC_CALC 0.6(https://github.com/luansheng/PIC_CALC)計(jì)算多態(tài)信息含量(PIC);運(yùn)用Arlequin 3.1計(jì)算群體間遺傳分化系數(shù)(Fst)及進(jìn)行分子變異分析(AMOVA) (Excoffier et al.,2005);同時(shí)基于Nei’s遺傳距離,通過MEGA 5.0以UPGMA法進(jìn)行聚類分析(Tamura et al.,2011)。

      2 結(jié)果與分析

      2. 1 微衛(wèi)星位點(diǎn)多態(tài)性分析結(jié)果

      利用11對(duì)微衛(wèi)星引物對(duì)9個(gè)凡納濱對(duì)蝦種苗群體共計(jì)258個(gè)個(gè)體的基因組進(jìn)行擴(kuò)增,結(jié)果(圖1和圖2)顯示,11個(gè)微衛(wèi)星位點(diǎn)均能進(jìn)行有效擴(kuò)增,其Na、Ne、Ho、He、I及PIC等信息見表3。各微衛(wèi)星位點(diǎn)的Na為5~39,Ne為1.6582~14.5320,Ho為0.2023~0.6357,He為0.3969~0.9312,I為0.8357~3.0296,PIC為0.3789~0.9274。其中,TUMXLv8.256、TUMXLv10.312和TUYFLvL16.1a位點(diǎn)的PIC分別為0.3821、0.4605和0.3789,而其余8個(gè)微衛(wèi)星位點(diǎn)的PIC均大于0.6000。

      2. 2 凡納濱對(duì)蝦種苗群體遺傳多樣性分析結(jié)果

      9個(gè)凡納濱對(duì)蝦種苗群體的Na、Ne、Ho、He、I和PIC平均值分別在5.5455~8.8182、3.2795~5.4735、0.3769~0.5182、0.6189~0.6948、1.2823~1.6092和0.5863~ 0.6646(表4)。其中,Stock 3群體的Na、Ne和I平均值最高,Stock 2群體的He和PIC平均值最高,而Stock 1群體的Na、Ne、Ho、PIC和I平均值均最低。在9個(gè)凡納濱對(duì)蝦種苗群體中,He平均值以Stock 6群體最低,而Ho平均值以Stock 7群體最高??梢姡鞣布{濱對(duì)蝦種苗群體均具有較高的遺傳多樣性,遺傳多樣性水平排序?yàn)镾tock 3>Stock 2>Stock 4>Stock 5>Stock 7>Stock 6>Stock 9>Stock 8>Stock 1。

      2. 3 凡納濱對(duì)蝦種苗群體遺傳分化及遺傳距離分析結(jié)果

      9個(gè)凡納濱對(duì)蝦種苗群體的AMOVA分析結(jié)果如表5所示,有91.82%的變異來自于群體內(nèi),僅有8.18%的變異來自于群體間。兩兩群體間的Fst范圍在0.0079~0.1494(表6),即整體遺傳分化表現(xiàn)為中低水平。其中,Stock 6群體與Stock 9群體間的Fst最高(0.1494),而Stock 2群體與Stock 4群體間的Fst最低(0.0079)。Stock 2、Stock 3、Stock 4和Stock 5等4個(gè)群體間及Stock 7群體與Stock 8群體間的Fst均小于0.05(0.0079~0.0371),即群體間無遺傳分化,而其他群體間表現(xiàn)為輕度遺傳分化(0.05<Fst <0.15)。

      9個(gè)凡納濱對(duì)蝦種苗群體間的Nei’s遺傳距離為0.0568~0.5084(表6),以Stock 2群體與Stock 4群體的Nei’s遺傳距離最近,而Stock 8群體與Stock 9群體的Nei’s遺傳距離最遠(yuǎn)。根據(jù)Nei’s遺傳距離構(gòu)建的UPGMA聚類圖(圖3)顯示,9個(gè)凡納濱對(duì)蝦種苗群體大致可劃分為三大分支,第一分支包括Stock 1~Stock 6群體,其中Stock 2群體和Stock 4群體先聚為一簇,然后依次同Stock 3、Stock 5、Stock 1和Stock 6等4個(gè)群體聚為一支;第二分支由Stock 7群體和Stock 8群體組成,而Stock 9群體獨(dú)立為第三分支。

      3 討論

      微衛(wèi)星分子標(biāo)記是物種群體遺傳多樣性分析的重要手段,而基因型分析是微衛(wèi)星分子標(biāo)記研究的關(guān)鍵環(huán)節(jié)。本研究采用基于毛細(xì)管電泳的熒光標(biāo)記引物進(jìn)行基因分型,選取11個(gè)具有多態(tài)性的微衛(wèi)星位點(diǎn),針對(duì)不同批次的凡納濱對(duì)蝦進(jìn)口親蝦一代苗群體開展遺傳多樣性分析,結(jié)果顯示各微衛(wèi)星位點(diǎn)的PIC為0.3789~0.9274。PIC能反映等位基因的多態(tài)性水平,PIC在0.25~0.50為中度多態(tài),在0.50之上則為高度多態(tài)(Shete et al.,2000;Nagy et al.,2012)。說明本研究選取的11個(gè)微衛(wèi)星分子標(biāo)記均呈中高度多態(tài),是評(píng)估群體遺傳多樣性的有效分子標(biāo)記。

      遺傳多樣性是種質(zhì)資源評(píng)價(jià)的重要依據(jù),Na、Ho、He和PIC等均是衡量群體遺傳多樣性的重要指標(biāo)。Zhang等(2014)選用7個(gè)微衛(wèi)星分子標(biāo)記對(duì)由新加坡和美國引進(jìn)的7個(gè)親蝦群體遺傳多樣性進(jìn)行分析,結(jié)果顯示,各群體的Na平均值為4.286~11.143,Ne平均值為3.090~6.407,Ho平均值為0.526~0.754,He平均值為0.600~0.802。本研究中,由引進(jìn)親蝦直接繁育的9個(gè)子一代苗群體的Na、Ne和He平均值均在以上相應(yīng)范圍內(nèi),僅Ho平均值小于上述指標(biāo),推測(cè)是由于各凡納濱對(duì)蝦群體幼體來源相同,其遺傳多樣性差異相對(duì)較小。包秀鳳(2014)針對(duì)親蝦源于正大集團(tuán)的養(yǎng)殖種苗群體開展微衛(wèi)星分析,發(fā)現(xiàn)受試群體的Na、Ne、He和PIC平均值分別為3.571、2.215、0.509和0.448,各項(xiàng)指標(biāo)均低于本研究結(jié)果。此外,于2018年5月在正大神灣蝦苗場(chǎng)采集的4個(gè)批次種苗群體(Stock 2、Stock 3、Stock 4和Stock 5)的I分別為1.5908、1.6092、1.4919和1.4874,其遺傳多樣性相近,且均高于其余5個(gè)群體(Stock 1、Stock 6、Stock 7、Stock 8和Stock 9),故推測(cè)遺傳多樣性水平能反映后續(xù)對(duì)蝦養(yǎng)殖生產(chǎn)性能的差異。

      Fst是衡量群體間遺傳分化程度的重要參數(shù)(黃小芳等,2020;彭敏等,2020)。Fst為0~0.05時(shí)表示群體間無遺傳分化,F(xiàn)st為0.05~0.15時(shí)表示群體間存在輕度遺傳分化,F(xiàn)st為0.15~0.25表示群體間存在中度遺傳分化,F(xiàn)st大于0.25時(shí)表示群體間存在高度遺傳分化。謝麗等(2009)研究指出Molokai、OI、SIS和Kona Bay等4個(gè)養(yǎng)殖凡納濱對(duì)蝦群體間的遺傳分化占15.83%;包秀鳳(2014)對(duì)國內(nèi)外7個(gè)選育凡納濱對(duì)蝦群體的遺傳分析結(jié)果表明,群體間的Fst平均值為0.2155;Zhang等(2014)研究發(fā)現(xiàn)7個(gè)國外引進(jìn)凡納濱對(duì)蝦群體間的遺傳分化水平為11.30%。在本研究中,9個(gè)凡納濱對(duì)蝦種苗群體間的Fst平均值為0.0818,即8.18%的變異來自于群體間,表現(xiàn)為中低水平的遺傳分化;但兩兩群體間的遺傳分化水平存在明顯差異,Stock 2、Stock 3、Stock 4和Stock 5等4個(gè)群體間及Stock 7群體與Stock 8群體間的Fst均小于0.05(0.0079~0.0371),即群體間無遺傳分化,而其他群體間表現(xiàn)為輕度遺傳分化,與各群體間的Nei’s遺傳距離基本對(duì)應(yīng)。一般情況下,群體間的遺傳距離越小,其親緣關(guān)系越近。基于Nei’s遺傳距離的聚類分析結(jié)果也表明,2018年5月采集自正大神灣蝦苗場(chǎng)的4個(gè)批次群體(Stock 2、Stock 3、Stock 4和Stock 5)間及2017年8月采集自海尚種苗培育基地的2個(gè)批次群體(Stock 7和Stock 8)間的親緣關(guān)系較接近,而較早采集自正大神灣蝦苗場(chǎng)的Stock 1群體與Stock 2~Stock 5群體的親緣關(guān)系相對(duì)較遠(yuǎn),其遺傳分化達(dá)中等水平。

      本研究利用微衛(wèi)星分子標(biāo)記分析不同批次進(jìn)口親蝦子一代種苗的遺傳變異特征,結(jié)果發(fā)現(xiàn)不同群體間存在遺傳多樣性差異,且表現(xiàn)出明顯的遺傳分化;由同一種苗培育(基地)企業(yè)提供的蝦苗在短期內(nèi)各群體間的遺傳分化保持在較低水平,但隨著時(shí)間的推移可能會(huì)發(fā)生較大變化;在同一時(shí)期由不同種苗培育(基地)企業(yè)培育獲得的蝦苗即使其親蝦來源相同,也會(huì)存在明顯的遺傳分化。這可能與近年來進(jìn)口親蝦子一代種苗在生長性能和養(yǎng)殖成活率等方面的性能變化有關(guān)聯(lián)。因此,有必要進(jìn)一步系統(tǒng)分析凡納濱對(duì)蝦進(jìn)口親蝦子一代種苗的遺傳變異狀況,并通過與之對(duì)應(yīng)的養(yǎng)殖實(shí)踐以獲得不同群體的養(yǎng)殖生產(chǎn)性能信息,建立各群體遺傳特征與養(yǎng)殖生產(chǎn)性能的關(guān)聯(lián)數(shù)據(jù)庫,為今后我國養(yǎng)殖對(duì)蝦優(yōu)質(zhì)種苗的大數(shù)據(jù)建設(shè)及其推廣應(yīng)用提供基礎(chǔ)數(shù)據(jù)支撐。

      4 結(jié)論

      不同批次凡納濱對(duì)蝦進(jìn)口親蝦子一代種苗群體的遺傳特征存在明顯差異,各群體間的遺傳距離隨著采樣時(shí)間和地點(diǎn)的改變而發(fā)生明顯變化,且這些遺傳背景差異可能會(huì)造成不同群體在養(yǎng)殖生產(chǎn)性能方面產(chǎn)生差異。

      參考文獻(xiàn):

      包秀鳳. 2014. 凡納濱對(duì)蝦選育群體遺傳多樣性分析[D]. 湛江:廣東海洋大學(xué). [Bao X F. 2014. Analysis of genetic diversity of selected stocks of Litopenaeus vannamei[D]. Zhanjiang:Guangdong Ocean University.] doi:10.7666/d.D522247.

      代平,孔杰,欒生. 2018. 我國凡納濱對(duì)蝦種質(zhì)資源引進(jìn)與分析[J]. 科學(xué)養(yǎng)魚,(1):3-5. [Dai P,Kong J,Luan S. 2018. Introduction and analysis of germplasm resources of Litopenaeus vannamei in China[J]. Scientific Fish Farming,(1):3-5.] doi:10.14184/j.cnki.issn1004-843x.2018.01. 002.

      黃小芳,唐章生,劉俊丹,張宏燕,鐘一治,盧智發(fā),侯樹鑒,王大鵬,陸專靈. 2020. 廣西不同地區(qū)克氏原螯蝦群體遺傳多樣性微衛(wèi)星分析[J]. 南方農(nóng)業(yè)學(xué)報(bào),51(2):437-444. [Huang X F,Tang Z S,Liu J D,Zhang H Y,Zhong Y Z,Lu Z F,Hou S J,Wang D P,Lu Z L. 2020. Genetic diversity microsatellite analysis of Procambarus clarkii po-pulations in different regions of Guangxi[J]. Journal of Southern Agriculture,51(2):437-444.] doi:10.3969/j.issn. 2095-1191.2020.02.025.

      李強(qiáng)勇,李旻,曾地剛,朱威霖,彭敏,楊春玲,劉青云,趙永貞,陳秀荔,陳曉漢. 2020. 凡納濱對(duì)蝦微衛(wèi)星分子標(biāo)記的開發(fā)及不同養(yǎng)殖家系遺傳多態(tài)性分析[J]. 南方農(nóng)業(yè)學(xué)報(bào),51(2):429-436. [Li Q Y,Li M,Zeng D G,Zhu W L,Peng M,Yang C L,Liu Q Y,Zhao Y Z,Chen X L,Chen X H. 2020. Development of microsatellite markers of Litopenaeus vannamei and genetic polymorphism analy-sis of different cultured families[J]. Journal of Southern Agriculture,51(2):429-436.] doi:10.3969/j.issn.2095-1191. 2020.02.024.

      劉連為,陳新軍,許強(qiáng)華,李偉文. 2014. 北太平洋柔魚微衛(wèi)星標(biāo)記的篩選及遺傳多樣性[J]. 生態(tài)學(xué)報(bào),34(23):6848-6854. [Liu L W,Chen X J,Xu Q H,Li W W. 2014. Isolation and genetic diversity of microsatellite DNA of Ommastrephes bartramii in the North Pacific Ocean[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica,34(23):6848-6854.] doi:10.5846/stxb 201303030334.

      毛守康,馬愛軍,丁福紅,閆喜武,羅海忠,李偉業(yè),徐寶榮,王懷忠,王寶義,王廣寧. 2016. 梭魚(Liza haematocheila)4個(gè)野生地理群體遺傳多樣性的微衛(wèi)星分析[J]. 漁業(yè)科學(xué)進(jìn)展,37(2):68-75. [Mao S K,Ma A J,Ding F H,Yan X W,Luo H Z,Li W Y,Xu B R,Wang H Z,Wang B Y,Wang G Y. 2016. Analysis of genetic structures of four wild geographic populations of mullet Liza haematocheila by using microsatellite marker technique[J]. Progress in Fishery Sciences,37(2):68-75.] doi:10.11758/yykxjz.20150407001.

      彭敏,陳慧芳,李強(qiáng)勇,楊春玲,曾地剛,劉青云,趙永貞,陳曉漢,林勇,陳秀荔. 2020. 凡納濱對(duì)蝦連續(xù) 3 個(gè)世代選育群體的遺傳多樣性分析[J]. 南方農(nóng)業(yè)學(xué)報(bào),51(6):1442-1450. [Peng M,Chen H F,Li Q Y,Yang C L,Zeng D G,Liu Q Y,Zhao Y Z,Chen X H,Lin Y,Chen X L. 2020. Genetic diversity of three consecutive generations of Litopenaeus vannamei[J]. Journal of Southern Agriculture,51(6):1442-1450.] doi:10.3969/j.issn.2095-1191. 2020.06.026.

      孫效文,張曉鋒,趙瑩瑩,張研,賈智英,常玉梅,魯翠云,梁利群. 2008. 水產(chǎn)生物微衛(wèi)星標(biāo)記技術(shù)研究進(jìn)展及其應(yīng)用[J]. 中國水產(chǎn)科學(xué),15(4):689-703. [Sun X W,Zhang X F,Zhao Y Y,Zhang Y,Jia Z Y,Chang Y M,Lu C Y,Liang L Q. 2008. Development and application of microsatellite markers in aquatic species[J]. Journal of Fishery Sciences of China,15(4):689-703.] doi:10.3321/j.issn:1005-8737.2008.04.022.

      童馨,龔世圓,喻達(dá)輝,杜博,黃桂菊,李莉好,郭奕惠,李色東. 2007. 凡納濱對(duì)蝦不同世代生長性狀的變異[J]. 南方水產(chǎn)科學(xué),3(6):30-33. [Tong X,Gong S Y,Yu D H,Du B,Huang G J,Li L H,Guo Y H,Li S D. 2007. Variation of growth traits at different generations of Pacific white shrimp(Litopenaeus vannamei)[J]. South China Fisheries Science,3(6):30-33.] doi:10.3969/j.issn.2095-0780.2007.06.005.

      童馨,龔世圓,喻達(dá)輝,黃桂菊,杜博,李色東. 2009. 凡納濱對(duì)蝦(Litopenaeus vannamei)不同世代養(yǎng)殖群體的遺傳多樣性分析[J]. 海洋與湖沼,40(2):214-220. [Tong X,Gong S Y,Yu D H,Huang G J,Du B,Li S D. 2009. Genetic diversity of cultured Pacific white shrimp(Litopenaeus vannamei) stocks of different generations in China[J]. Oceanologia et Limnologia Sinica,40(2):214-220.] doi:10.3321/j.issn:0029-814X.2009.02.017.

      王麗花,曹煜成,李卓佳. 2012. 溶藻細(xì)菌控藻作用及其在對(duì)蝦養(yǎng)殖池塘中的應(yīng)用前景[J]. 南方水產(chǎn)科學(xué),8(4):76-82. [Wang L H,Cao Y C,Li Z J. 2012. Algae-constrai-ning effect of algae-lysing bacteria and its application prospect in shrimp ponds[J]. South China Fisheries Science,8(4):76-82.] doi:10.3969/j.issn.2095-0780.2012.04.012.

      王興強(qiáng),馬甡,董雙林. 2004. 凡納濱對(duì)蝦生物學(xué)及養(yǎng)殖生態(tài)學(xué)研究進(jìn)展[J]. 海洋湖沼通報(bào),(4):94-100. [Wang X Q,Ma S,Dong S L. 2004. Studies on the biology and cultural ecology of Litopenaeus vannamei:A review[J]. Transactions of Oceanology and Limnology,(4):94-100.] doi:10.3969/j.issn.1003-6482.2004.04.016.

      文國樑,曹煜成,徐煜,胡曉娟,徐武杰,李卓佳. 2015. 養(yǎng)殖對(duì)蝦肝胰腺壞死綜合癥研究進(jìn)展[J]. 廣東農(nóng)業(yè)科學(xué),42(11):118-123. [Wen G L,Cao Y C,Xu Y,Hu X J,Xu W J,Li Z J. 2015. Review on hepatopancreas necrosis syndrome of shrimp[J]. Guangdong Agricultural Sciences,42(11):118-123.] doi:10.3969/j.issn.1004-874X.2015.11. 022.

      吳怡迪,駱軒,楊章武,黃永春,游偉偉. 2016. 凡納濱對(duì)蝦選育系間雜交的生長性狀及遺傳多樣性分析[J]. 廈門大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(自然科學(xué)版),55(5):646-653. [Wu Y D,Luo X,Yang Z W,Huang Y C,You W W. 2016. Growth performance and genetic diversity analysis for hybrids between selective lines of Litopenaeus vannamei[J]. Journal of Xiamen University (Natural Science),55(5):646-653.] doi:10.6043/j.issn.0438-0479.201511010.

      謝麗,陳國良,葉富良,栗志民. 2009. 凡納濱對(duì)蝦4個(gè)選育群體遺傳多樣性的SSR分析[J]. 廣東海洋大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào),29(4):5-9. [Xie L,Chen G L,Ye F L,Li Z M. 2009. Genetic diversity of four selected stocks of Litopenaeus vannamei as revealed by SSR marker[J]. Journal of Guangdong Ocean University,29(4):5-9.] doi:10.3969/j.issn. 1673-9159.2009.04.002.

      趙志英,梁麗運(yùn),白麗蓉. 2018. 斑節(jié)對(duì)蝦3個(gè)野生群體遺傳多樣性的微衛(wèi)星標(biāo)記分析[J]. 熱帶海洋學(xué)報(bào),37(3):65-72. [Zhao Z Y,Liang L Y,Bai L R. 2018. Analysis of genetic diversity among three wild populations of Penaeus monodon using microsatellite marker[J]. Journal of Tropical Oceanography,37(3):65-72.] doi:10.11978/2017084.

      周大顏,張志新,黃彩林,招志杰,莫飛龍. 2019. 3種白鯽雜交子代的轉(zhuǎn)錄組學(xué)分析[J]. 南方農(nóng)業(yè)學(xué)報(bào),50(6):1328-1338. [Zhou D Y,Zhang Z X,Huang C L,Zhao Z J,Mo F L. 2019. Transcriptomic analysis of three Carassius auratus cuvieri hybrids[J]. Journal of Southern Agriculture,50(6):1328-1338.] doi:10.3969/j.issn.2095-1191.2019. 06.24.

      Alcivar-Warren A,Meehan-Meola D,Park S W,Xu Z K,Dela-ney M,Zuniga G. 2007a. ShrimpMap:A low-density,microsatellite-based linkage map of the pacific white leg shrimp,Litopenaeus vannamei:Identification of sex-linked markers in linkage group 4[J]. Journal of Shellfish Research,26(4):1259-1277. doi:10.2983/0730-8000(2007)26[1259:SALMLM]2.0.CO;2.

      Alcivar-Warren A,Song L S,Meehan-Meola D,Xu Z K,Xiang J H,Warren W. 2007b. Characterization and mapping of expressed sequence tags isolated from a subtrac-ted cDNA library of Litopenaeus vannamei injected with white spot syndrome virus[J]. Journal of Shellfish Resear-ch,26(4):1247-1258. doi:10.2983/0730-8000(2007)26[1247:CAMOES]2.0.CO;2.

      Cruz P,Mejia-Ruiz C H,Perez-Enriquez R,Ibarra A M. 2002. Isolation and characterization of microsatellites in Pacific white shrimp Penaeus(Litopenaeus) vannamei[J]. Molecular Ecology Notes,2(3):239-241. doi:10.1046/j.1471- 8286.2002.00211.x-i2.

      Excoffier L,Laval G,Schneider S. 2005. Arlequin (version 3.0):An integrated software package for population genetics data analysis[J]. Evolutionary Bioinformatics,1:47-50. doi:10.1177/117693430500100003.

      Garcia D K,Alcivar-Warren A. 2007. Characterization of 35 new microsatellite genetic markers for the pacific whiteleg shrimp,Litopenaeus vannamei:Their usefulness for studying genetic diversity of wild and cultured stocks,tracing pedigree in breeding programs,and linkage mapping[J]. Journal of Shellfish Research,26(4):1203-1216. doi:10.2983/0730-8000(2007)26[1203:CONMGM]2.0.CO;2.

      Garcia D K,Dhar A K,Alcivar-Warren A. 1996. Molecular analysis of a RAPD marker(B20) reveals two microsatellites and differential mRNA expression in Penaeus vannamei[J]. Molecular Marine Biology and Biotechnology,5(1):71-83.

      Jia Z Y,Sun X W,Liang L Q,Li D Y,Lei Q Q. 2006. Isolation and characterization of microsatellite markers from Pacific white shrimp(Litopenaeus vannamei)[J]. Molecular Ecology Notes,6(4):1282-1284. doi:10.1111/j.1471-8286.2006.01515.x.

      Meehan D,Xu Z K,Zuniga G,Alcivar-Warren A. 2003. High frequency and large number of polymorphic microsatellites in cultured shrimp,Penaeus(Litopenaeus) vannamei [Crustacea:Decapoda][J]. Marine Biotechnology,5:311-330. doi:10.1007/s10126-002-0092-z.

      Nagy S,Poczai P,Cernák I,Gorji A M,Heged?s G,Taller J. 2012. PICcalc:An online program to calculate polymorphic information content for molecular genetic studies[J]. Biochemical Genetics,50:670-672. doi:10.1007/s10528-012-9509-1.

      Qiu L,Chen M M,Wan X Y,Li C,Zhang Q L,Wang R Y,Cheng D Y,Dong X,Yang B,Wang X H,Xiang J H,Huang J. 2017. Characterization of a new member of Iridoviridae,Shrimp hemocyte iridescent virus(SHIV),found in white leg shrimp(Litopenaeus vannamei)[J]. Scienti-fic Reports,7:11834. doi:10.1038/s41598-017-10738-8.

      Shete S,Tiwari H,Elston R C. 2000. On estimating the he-terozygosity and polymorphism information content value[J]. Theoretical Population Biology,57(3):265-271. doi:10.1006/tpbi.2000.1452.

      Tamura K,Peterson D,Peterson N,Stecher G,Nei M,Kumar S. 2011. MEGA5:Molecular evolutionary genetics analysis using maximum likelihood,evolutionary distance,and maximum parsimony methods[J]. Molecular Biology and Evolution,28(10):2731-2739. doi:10.1093/molbev/msr121.

      Wang M S,Wang W J,Xiao G X,Liu K F,Hu Y L,Tian T,Kong J,Jin X S. 2016. Genetic diversity analysis of spaw-ner and recaptured populations of Chinese shrimp(Fenneropenaeus chinensis) during stock enhancement in the Bohai Bay based on an SSR marker[J]. Acta Oceanologica Sinica,35(8):51-56. doi:10.1007/s13131-016-0830-0.

      Yeh F C,Boyle T J B. 1997. Population genetic analysis of co-dominant and dominant markers and quantitative traits[J]. Belgian Journal of Botany,129(2):157.

      Zhang K,Wang W J,Li W Y,Zhang Q Q,Kong J. 2014. Analysis of genetic diversity and differentiation of seven stocks of Litopenaeus vannamei using microsatellite mar-kers[J]. Journal of Ocean University of China,13(4):647-656. doi:10.1007/s11802-014-2208-2.

      收稿日期:2020-05-26

      基金項(xiàng)目:中國水產(chǎn)科學(xué)研究院基本科研業(yè)務(wù)費(fèi)專項(xiàng)(2020TD54);國家現(xiàn)代農(nóng)業(yè)產(chǎn)業(yè)技術(shù)體系建設(shè)專項(xiàng)(CARS-48);廣東省現(xiàn)代農(nóng)業(yè)產(chǎn)業(yè)技術(shù)體系創(chuàng)新團(tuán)隊(duì)建設(shè)專項(xiàng)(2019KJ149)

      通訊作者:曹煜成(1979-),https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0995-1131,博士,研究員,主要從事水產(chǎn)健康養(yǎng)殖及養(yǎng)殖生態(tài)環(huán)境調(diào)控與修復(fù)研究工作,E-mail:cyc_715@163.com;楊鏗(1975-),https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6970-0668,副研究員,主要從事水產(chǎn)健康養(yǎng)殖技術(shù)及產(chǎn)品推廣應(yīng)用研究工作,E-mail:yangkeng66@163.com

      第一作者:徐煜(1987-),https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2364-6659,主要從事對(duì)蝦分子生理及健康養(yǎng)殖研究工作,E-mail:xuyublq@163.com

      1443501186395

      猜你喜歡
      遺傳變異
      葡萄醇酰基轉(zhuǎn)移酶編碼基因遺傳變異研究
      武漢市園科院“蓮基因組遺傳變異與表達(dá)數(shù)據(jù)庫”數(shù)據(jù)信息被國家基因庫收錄
      園林科技(2021年2期)2022-01-19 02:22:38
      先導(dǎo)編輯技術(shù)可編輯近90%的人類遺傳變異
      基于改進(jìn)遺傳變異算子的海島算法
      電子制作(2019年24期)2019-02-23 13:22:18
      寬葉藍(lán)靛果葉片不同海拔和郁閉度的遺傳變異研究
      森林工程(2018年3期)2018-06-26 03:40:46
      豬偽狂犬病毒的分離鑒定及其gE、TK全基因序列遺傳變異分析(內(nèi)文第133~144頁)圖版
      火力楠子代遺傳變異分析及優(yōu)良家系選擇
      江南油杉優(yōu)樹子代家系苗期遺傳變異與早期選擇
      GABABR2基因遺傳變異與肥胖及代謝相關(guān)表型的關(guān)系
      廣西鴨圓環(huán)病毒流行毒株遺傳變異分析
      新邵县| 吴桥县| 尼勒克县| 泗阳县| 琼结县| 萨嘎县| 吕梁市| 全州县| 哈巴河县| 甘德县| 安达市| 庆云县| 怀仁县| 新乡市| 新兴县| 元谋县| 河东区| 东辽县| 阿城市| 镇平县| 祁阳县| 珠海市| 灵山县| 夏津县| 灌云县| 肥东县| 定远县| 安泽县| 正定县| 定边县| 洛隆县| 昆明市| 滕州市| 深州市| 包头市| 渭源县| 大新县| 霍山县| 台湾省| 随州市| 巴彦淖尔市|