河北美術(shù)學(xué)院

張立芳　寧貴霞

ThePerspectiveofTragedyintheBookofJob

河北美術(shù)學(xué)院

張立芳寧貴霞

TheBookofJobandGreektragedyhavetheprofoundhistoricalorigin.Althoughitisnotarealsenseoftragedy,ithas naturaltragicingredientsandinheritedtragicingredientsfromGreektragedy.TheBookofJobisnotonlyanepicorapoeticdrama,but alsocontainstragicperspective.

tragedy；BookofJob；Greektragedy

1.Tragedy

Althoughthereisnoformulafordecidingwhatconstitutes thetragic,mostpeoplehaveageneralideaofwhattragedyis about.AsGeorgeSteinerputsitsuccinctly,“Tragediesendbadly.”Thoughmattersareneversosimple,asindicatedbelow,itis commonlyacknowledgedthattragedyportraystheheroesriseand fall,whatFryereferstoastragedy’sbinaryform.

Tragedyinvolvescatastrophe,andthecatastrophicevents thatbringthetragictaletoclosureareirreparableandirreversible.Butthetragicismorefullyarticulatedinsomeworks thanothers.AsH.A.Masonpointsout,therearedegreesof tragedy.“Weare,”henotes,“alwaysreadytosay,‘thisismore tragicthanthat’…”

2.TheperspectiveoftragedyinTheBookofJob

TheBookofJobprobablycameintobeinginHellenisticPeriodbetween4thcenturyADand3rdcenturyAD.Thepoetic formmaydirectlyaffectedbyGreektragedy.Thecontentand languagealsohaveGreektragictrace.Theideologicaltrait,althoughstillhasitsownHebrewreligiousfeeling,italsopresent someobviousGreektragedybreath.

NeitherinformnorincontentdidtheancientHebrewproduceanyliteratureresemblingGreektragedy.Greektragedywas basedonmythologicaltalesinwhichgodsappearlikemen.A constantthemeinworkssuchasPrometheusBoundandOedipus Rexisthematerializationofthesphereofthegodsanditseffects amongmortals.TheBible,ontheotherhand,thoughitcontains instancesofthedialogicrelationshipbetweenmanandhiscreator, typicallyplacesthegodheadatalevelofintensityandabstraction farbeyondhumancomprehension.Therepresentationbeforean audienceofadivinityorsemidivinityisquiteinconceivableina societywhichtakesthecommandment,“youshallnotmakefor yourselfagravenimage,oranylikenessofanythingthatisin heavenabove”initsmostabsolutesense.

TheBookofJobdealswiththeuniversalconcernforandinterestinthesubjectofhumansuffering.Ithasabeginning,dramaticchange,andanend.JobbeginswithaGod-fearingrighteousman,livingahappylife.Outofexpectation,hewastested, afflictedbyGod,stuckbyonedisasterafteranother,butJobconsistentlyrefusestocompromisethehonestyofhisownlife.Eventually,theLordanswershimoutofawhirlwind.Jobconcedesand wasrewardedwithhealth,wealthandprestige.Theauthorprobes themysteryofundeservedsufferingandexistenceofevilina worldsupposedlycreatedbyagoodandall-powerfulGod.The authordoesnotintendtomakeJobatragicfigure,butrathera triumphantone.Heisalsoagloriousnon-conformist.Jobisalwaysverymuchalive,aliveeveningreatphysicalandspiritual affliction.Itisthisawarenessthatmakesahumanbeingahuman being,notarobot.ThismessagerendersJobasatimelessdiscourse,speakingtomenandwomenofourageaswellastothose ofpastmillennia.

TheBookofJobendswithJobconcedesandwasrewarded withhealth,wealthandprestige.Thisseeminglyhappyendingalmostletsthetragicforcevanish.Actuallythisisahiddennegativeending.Job’ssilenceandcompromisejustadmitthegreatnessofGodandthehelplessnessofhumanbeing.Asfortheintegrityheneveryields.Hesays,“Ihaveheardoftheebythe hearingoftheear.Butnowmineeyeseethethee.WhereforeI abhormyself.”Hehateshimselfnotbecauseheadmitsheis wrongbutbecauseheseeshowtinyandhelplesshumanbeingis beforeGod.WhiletheforgivenessofJob’soffenceisjustlikethe punishmenttoJob’sinnocenceatthebeginning,allofwhichjust showGod’sintangibility.Itdeniesmen’swishtoplayuptoGod throughgoodness.AlthoughJobregainshappiness,helosessafety forever.Theendingquietlydestroyshuman’srighteousnessprincipleofgoodisrewarded.TheBookofJobshowshuman’sirresistibleexistencedilemmaandthebraveactiontoquestionwhen theyfacethechangeablefate.Themoreitdeniesthepossibilityto getridofthedilemmathroughjustice,themoreitcaninspire theirpositivedefensetojusticeandtheexplorationofrescuefrom theirheart.Inthisway,theaestheticfeelingoftragedycomesinto beinginhuman’sstrongwishtoanswerthelivingperplexities.

3.Conclusion

Tosumup，TheBookofJobisnotonlyanepicorapoetic drama,butalsocontainstragicperspective.

Bibliography

王蓓，《圣經(jīng)》的悲劇美[J]，外國文學(xué)評論，2010.4.13.

一、在自讀中感知課文的魅力

趙錚，從百葉窗射進的悲劇性—《約伯記》中的悲劇成分與古希臘悲劇的幾點異同[J]，湖州師范學(xué)院學(xué)報，2003年第4期張纓，上帝的權(quán)能與智慧—《約伯記》中神意主題的展開[J]，圣經(jīng)文學(xué)研究，2008年。