秸稈全量還田與氮肥用量對水稻產(chǎn)量、氮肥利用率及氮素?fù)p失的影響

張 剛， 王德建， 俞元春， 王 燦， 莊錦貴

(1 南京林業(yè)大學(xué)生物與環(huán)境學(xué)院， 南京 210037； 2 中國科學(xué)院南京土壤研究所， 南京 210008；3 南京林業(yè)大學(xué)南方現(xiàn)代林業(yè)協(xié)同創(chuàng)新中心， 南京 210037)

?

秸稈全量還田與氮肥用量對水稻產(chǎn)量、氮肥利用率及氮素?fù)p失的影響

張 剛1,2,3， 王德建2， 俞元春1,3*， 王 燦2， 莊錦貴2

(1 南京林業(yè)大學(xué)生物與環(huán)境學(xué)院， 南京 210037； 2 中國科學(xué)院南京土壤研究所， 南京 210008；3 南京林業(yè)大學(xué)南方現(xiàn)代林業(yè)協(xié)同創(chuàng)新中心， 南京 210037)

秸稈還田； 氮肥用量； 氮肥利用率； 氮素?fù)p失率； 水稻產(chǎn)量

1　材料與方法

1.1試驗(yàn)設(shè)計(jì)

試驗(yàn)采用原狀模擬土柱，采集土柱的PVC管高度為100 cm，內(nèi)直徑為48 cm，采集土柱深度為85 cm，在每個土柱距表土80 cm深度安裝一側(cè)向滲漏水采集管，80 cm深度下置一石英沙盤，通過側(cè)向管控制原裝土柱的滲漏量，原狀土柱采集方法依據(jù)文獻(xiàn)[13]。試驗(yàn)設(shè)置為裂區(qū)設(shè)計(jì)，秸稈還田(S)為主處理，氮肥用量(N)為副處理，主處理為秸稈全量還田與不還田兩個處理，副處理設(shè)置5個N水平: 0、 120、 180、 240和300 kg/hm2，秸稈還田與施氮組合共8個處理，依次為N0、 N1、 N2、 N3、 SN1、 SN2、 SN3和SN4，3次重復(fù)，共24個模擬土柱。

氮肥40%做基施、 20%和40%分別做分蘗肥、 穗肥追施，磷鉀肥用量均為P 15 kg/hm2和K 90 kg/hm2，磷肥為過磷酸鈣，鉀肥為氯化鉀，均作為基肥一次施入。麥秸(5000 kg/hm2)經(jīng)切碎后(約0.5 cm)，隨耕地翻埋地下，麥秸有機(jī)碳含量為440.5 g/kg，全氮含量為4.02 g/kg，碳氮比為109.5。供試水稻品種為南粳46，水稻栽插密度為23穴/m2。

1.2測定項(xiàng)目與方法

1.2.2 水樣測定于水稻移栽后的第2天開始采集土柱底層淋溶水(80 cm)，施肥后每2天采集一次，平常每10 天采集1次，直至水稻收獲。所采水樣經(jīng)處理后放入冰箱中保存并盡快測定，分析總氮濃度，采用K2S2O8氧化—紫外分光比色法測定[14]。

1.2.3 植物樣測定水稻成熟后測產(chǎn)，籽粒產(chǎn)量以14%水分計(jì)。每個小區(qū)選取有代表性植株25株，分別測定籽粒、 秸稈全氮含量，測定方法采用H2SO4-混合加速劑-蒸餾法[14]。

1.2.4 土樣測定水稻收獲后，采集耕層土壤(0—15 cm)，風(fēng)干，粉碎過0.25 mm篩，采用凱氏定氮法測定土壤全氮含量[14]。

1.3計(jì)算方法及數(shù)據(jù)分析

以肥力差減法計(jì)算氮肥農(nóng)學(xué)利用率、 氮肥表觀吸收率、 氮肥淋溶損失率、 氮肥氨揮發(fā)損失率、 氮肥土壤殘留率等[15-16]，其計(jì)算公式分別為:

氮肥農(nóng)學(xué)利用率(Grain kg/kg N)=(施氮區(qū)籽粒產(chǎn)量-對照區(qū)籽粒產(chǎn)量)/施氮量

氮肥表觀利用率(%)=(施氮區(qū)作物吸氮量-對照區(qū)作物吸氮量)/施氮量×100

氮肥氨揮發(fā)損失率(%)=(施氮區(qū)氨揮發(fā)量-對照區(qū)氨揮發(fā)量)/施氮量×100

氮肥淋溶損失率(%)=(施氮區(qū)氮素淋溶量-對照區(qū)氮素淋溶量)/施氮量×100

氮素耕層土壤殘留率(%)=(施氮區(qū)氮素殘留量-對照區(qū)氮素殘留量)/施氮量×100

根據(jù)氮的質(zhì)量守恒原理計(jì)算氮肥在整個水稻生育期的其他損失率和損失量，包括未監(jiān)測的土壤殘留(15—80 cm)、 徑流損失及N2、 N2O等氣體損失。

所有試驗(yàn)數(shù)據(jù)分析采用Microsoft Excel 2010與SPSS軟件。

2　結(jié)果與分析

2.1秸稈還田配施氮肥對產(chǎn)量的影響

表1　秸稈還田配施氮肥對水稻產(chǎn)量的影響(g/soil column)

注(Note): 同列數(shù)據(jù)后不同字母表示處理間差異顯著，括號內(nèi)不同字母表示相同施氮量下不同秸稈處理間差異顯著(LSD法檢驗(yàn)) Values followed by different letters are significantly different among N treatments at the 5% level, and different letters in brackets are significantly different between the S+N treatments and N treatments under the same N application rate according to LSD test.

在施用等量氮肥情況下，SN3和N3處理水稻產(chǎn)量差異顯著，SN2和N2處理、 SN1和N1處理差異均不顯著。相較單施氮肥處理，除2009年第一季水稻產(chǎn)量SN1處理低于N1處理外，秸稈還田配施氮肥處理水稻產(chǎn)量均高于單施氮肥處理，在N1、 N2和N3水平下，3年平均增產(chǎn)分別為6.7、 5.8和31.7 g/土柱，增產(chǎn)率分別為 3.5%、 2.5%和12.8%，平均增產(chǎn)率為6.3%，其中SN3 處理水稻產(chǎn)量增幅最高。

2.2秸稈還田配施氮肥對水稻氮素利用率的影響

表2　秸稈還田配施氮肥對水稻氮素利用率的影響(2011)

注(Note): 同列數(shù)據(jù)后不同字母表示處理間差異顯著，括號內(nèi)不同字母表示相同施氮量下不同秸稈處理間差異顯著(LSD法檢驗(yàn)) Values followed by different letters are significantly different among the N treatments at the 5% level, and different letters in brackets are significantly different between the S+N treatments and N treatments under the same N application rate according to LSD test.

2.3秸稈還田配施氮肥對稻田氨揮發(fā)損失的影響

N0處理稻季氨揮發(fā)總損失量為2.04 kg/hm2，N1、 N2和N3處理分別為5.69、 7.04、 10.01 kg/hm2，不同施氮處理間差異顯著，并且苗期、 分蘗期和抽穗期不同施氮水平間氨揮發(fā)損失量差異顯著，氨揮發(fā)損失量均隨施氮量的增加而增加。在相同施氮水平下，SN3處理在苗期、 分蘗期和抽穗期的氨揮發(fā)損失量分別占氨揮發(fā)損失總量的35.0%、 47.3%和17.7%，其中苗期和分蘗期與N3處理差異顯著，抽穗期差異不顯著； SN3處理與N3處理氨揮發(fā)總損失量差異顯著，SN3處理氨揮發(fā)總損失量比N3處理增加了18.2%。

表3　秸稈還田配施氮肥水稻的氨揮發(fā)損失(kg/hm2， 2010)

注(Note): 同列數(shù)據(jù)后不同字母表示處理間差異顯著(LSD法檢驗(yàn)) Values followed by different letters are significantly different among the N treatments at the 5% level according to LSD test.

2.4秸稈還田配施氮肥對稻田氮素淋溶損失的影響

表4　秸稈還田配施氮肥水稻氮肥的淋溶損失(20092011)

注(Note): 同列數(shù)據(jù)后不同字母表示處理間差異顯著，括號內(nèi)不同字母表示相同施氮量下不同秸稈處理間差異顯著(LSD法檢驗(yàn)) Values followed by different letters are significantly different among N treatments at the 5% level， and different letters in brackets are significantly different between the S+N treatments and N treatments under the same N application rate according to LSD test.

在相同施氮水平下，秸稈還田配施氮肥處理和單施氮肥處理的氮肥淋溶損失年度變化趨勢不一致，2009年SN1和SN2處理氮肥淋溶量分別小于N1和N2處理，SN3處理高于N3處理，2010年SN1、 SN2和SN3處理氮肥淋溶量均小于單施氮肥處理，2011年SN1和SN2處理氮肥淋溶量分別高于N1和N2處理，SN3處理低于N3處理。本試驗(yàn)中3年平均氮肥淋溶量顯示，秸稈還田配施氮肥處理和單施氮肥處理沒有顯著性差異，其中SN1和SN2處理氮肥淋溶量高于N1和N2處理，平均增加14.5%的氮肥淋溶損失； SN3處理氮肥淋溶量低于N3處理，減少30.9%的氮肥淋溶損失。

2.5秸稈還田配施氮肥對氮肥土壤殘留量的影響

試驗(yàn)進(jìn)行3年后，于2011年水稻收獲后采集耕層土壤(0—15 cm)并分析其全氮?dú)埩袅俊D1表明，當(dāng)施氮量為120、 180和240 kg/hm2時，氮肥在土壤的殘留量分別為28.9、 37.3和49.5 kg/hm2，呈明顯的增加趨勢； 而相對應(yīng)的氮肥在土壤中的殘留率分別為24.1%、 20.7%和20.6%，呈下降趨勢。由此可見，氮肥在土壤中的殘留量受施氮量的控制，隨施氮量的增加而增加，而殘留率隨施氮量的增加而降低。秸稈還田配施氮肥處理下土壤氮肥殘留變化規(guī)律與單施氮肥變化規(guī)律基本一致(圖1)。

圖1　氮肥在0—15 cm土壤中的殘留Fig.1　Fertilizer N residual in 0-15 cm soil of rice field under different treatments

在相同施氮水平下，氮肥在土壤中的殘留量表現(xiàn)為秸稈還田配施氮肥處理大于單施氮肥處理，SN1、 SN2、 SN3處理較N1、 N2、 N3處理殘留量分別增加8.4、 11.0、 10.1 kg/hm2，平均增加9.8 kg/hm2，殘留率分別增加7.0、 6.2、 4.2個百分點(diǎn)，平均增加5.8個百分點(diǎn)，這表明秸稈還田可以加強(qiáng)土壤對氮肥的持留，增加土壤的含氮量，提高氮肥在土壤中的殘留率。

2.6秸稈還田配施氮肥對稻田氮肥總損失量的影響

本試驗(yàn)中氮肥的總損失量包括徑流損失氮、 淋溶損失氮、 氣態(tài)損失氮以及15—80 cm土層的殘留氮，因本試驗(yàn)中沒有監(jiān)測15—80 cm土層的殘留氮、 徑流損失氮以及N2、 N2O等氣體損失。因此，采用氮素守恒法計(jì)算不同處理的氮肥總損失量和總損失率(表5)。

表5　不同處理氮肥總損失量和損失率(2011)

3　討論

通過上述研究結(jié)果表明，秸稈全量還田下配施氮肥可以提高水稻產(chǎn)量、 氮肥農(nóng)學(xué)利用率、 氮肥表觀利用率，降低氮肥的總損失率。因此，在本試驗(yàn)條件下，綜合考慮水稻產(chǎn)量、 氮肥利用率、 氮肥損失率及氮肥土壤殘留狀況，麥秸全量還田下配施N 240 kg/hm2是稻麥輪作地區(qū)兼顧水稻產(chǎn)量、 土壤肥力保持、 環(huán)境安全等方面的合理耕作措施，值得借鑒與推廣。有關(guān)秸稈還田的殘效功能對下季作物的產(chǎn)量及氮肥用量的影響，有待于進(jìn)一步研究。

[1]江立庚, 曹衛(wèi)星. 水稻高效利用氮素的生理機(jī)制及有效途徑[J]. 中國水稻科學(xué), 2002, 16(3): 261-264.

Jiang L G, Cao W X. Physiological mechanism and approaches for efficient nitrogen utilization in rice[J]. Chinese Journal of Rice Science, 2002, 16(3): 261-264.

[2]楊林章, 王德建, 夏立忠. 太湖地區(qū)農(nóng)業(yè)面源污染特征及控制途徑[J]. 中國水利, 2004, 20: 29-30.

Yang L Z, Wang D J, Xia L Z. Features and ways of control non-point agricultural pollution in Taihu area[J]. China Water Resources, 2004, 20: 29-30.

[3]Tian Y H, Yin B, Yang L Z,etal. Nitrogen runoff and leaching losses during rice-wheat rotations in Taihu lake region, China[J]. Pedosphere, 2007, 17(4): 445-456.

[4]馮偉, 張利群, 龐中偉, 郭淑珍. 中國秸稈廢棄焚燒與資源化利用的經(jīng)濟(jì)與環(huán)境分析[J]. 中國農(nóng)學(xué)通報(bào), 2011, 27(6): 350-354.

Feng W, Zhang L Q, Pang Z W, Guo S J. The economic and environmental analysis of crop residues burning and reutilization in China[J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2011, 27(6): 350-354.

[5]Eagle A J, Bird J A, Horwath W R,etal. Rice yield and nitrogen utilization efficiency under alternative straw management practices[J]. Agronomy Journal, 2000, 92(6): 1096-1103.

[6]Verma T S, Bhagat R M. Impact of rice straw management practices on yield, nitrogen uptake and soil properties in a wheat-rice rotation in northern India[J]. Fertilizer Research, 1992, 33(2): 97-106.

[7]馬永良, 師宏奎, 張書奎, 呂潤海. 玉米秸稈整株全量還田土壤理化性狀的變化及其對后茬小麥生長的影響[J]. 中國農(nóng)業(yè)大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào), 2003, 8(增刊): 42-46.

Ma Y L, Shi H K, Zhang S K, Lü R H. Whole maize straw addition: the changes of soil physical and chemical properties and the effect on winter wheat[J]. Journal of China Agricultural University, 2003, 8(Suppl.): 42-46.

[8]張慶忠, 吳文良, 王明新, 等. 秸稈還田和施氮對農(nóng)田土壤呼吸的影響[J]. 生態(tài)學(xué)報(bào), 2005, 25(11): 2883-2887.

Zhang Q Z, Wu W L, Wang M X,etal. The effects of crop residue amendment and N rate on soil respiration[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2005, 25(11): 2883-2887.

[9]趙鵬, 陳阜. 秸稈還田配施化學(xué)氮肥對冬小麥氮效率和產(chǎn)量的影響[J]. 作物學(xué)報(bào), 2008, 34(6): 1014-1018.

Zhao P, Chen F. Effects of straw mulching plus nitrogen fertilizer on nitrogen efficiency and grain yield in winter wheat[J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2008, 34(6): 1014-1018.

[10]趙四申, 張西群, 賈素梅, 等. 玉米秸稈整株還田對小麥生長發(fā)育及產(chǎn)量的影響[J]. 中國生態(tài)農(nóng)業(yè)學(xué)報(bào), 2003,11(1): 145-147.

Zhao S S, Zhang X Q, Jia S M,etal. Influence of returning whole corn stalk into soil on wheat growth and its yield[J]. Chinese Journal of Eco-Agriculture, 2003, 11(1): 145-147.

[11]汪軍, 王德建, 張剛. 太湖地區(qū)稻麥輪作體系下秸稈還田配施氮肥對水稻產(chǎn)量及經(jīng)濟(jì)效益的影響[J]. 中國生態(tài)農(nóng)業(yè)學(xué)報(bào), 2011,19(2): 265-270.

Wang J, Wang D J, Zhang G. Effects of different N-fertilizer rates with straw incorporation on rice yield and economic benefit of rice-wheat rotation system in Taihu Lake region[J]. Chinese Journal of Eco-Agriculture, 2011, 19(2): 265-270.

[12]徐國偉, 談桂露, 王志琴, 等. 秸稈還田與實(shí)地氮肥管理對直播水稻產(chǎn)量、 品質(zhì)及氮肥利用的影響[J]. 中國農(nóng)業(yè)科學(xué), 2009, 42(8): 2736-2746.

Xu G W, Tan G L, Wang Z Q,etal. Effects of wheat-residue application and site-specific nitrogen management on grain yield and quality and nitrogen use efficiency in direct-seeding rice[J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2009, 42(8): 2736-2746.

[13]王德建, 張剛, 汪軍, 等. 水稻基肥尿素干施與濕施對氮素?fù)p失及水稻氮素吸收的影響[J]. 土壤學(xué)報(bào), 2010, 47(3): 483-489.

Wang D J, Zhang G, Wang J,etal. Effects of dry deep-placement and wet broadcast of urea as basal in paddy field on nitrogen loss and plant N uptake[J]. Acta Pedologica Sinica, 2010, 47(3): 483-489.

[14]魯如坤. 土壤農(nóng)業(yè)化學(xué)分析方法[M]. 北京: 中國農(nóng)業(yè)科技出版社, 2000. 128-129, 148-149, 308-309.

Lu R K. Analysis method of soil and agro-chemistry[M]. Beijing: China Agricultural Science and Technology Press, 2000. 128-129, 148-149, 308-309.

[15]張耀鴻, 張亞麗, 黃啟為, 等. 不同氮肥水平下水稻產(chǎn)量以及氮素吸收、 利用的基因型差異比較[J]. 植物營養(yǎng)與肥料學(xué)報(bào), 2006, 12(5) : 616-621.

Zhang Y H, Zhang Y L, Huang Q W,etal. Effects of different nitrogen application rates on grain yields and nitrogen uptake and utilization by different rice cultivars[J]. Plant Nutrition and Fertilizer Science, 2006, 12(5): 616-621.

[16]Lin D X, Fan X H, Hu F,etal. Ammonia volatilization and nitrogen utilization efficiency in response to urea application in rice fields of the Taihu Lake region, China[J]. Pedosphere, 2007, 17(5): 639-645.

[17]Rao, D. N., Mikkelsen D. S. Effect of rice straw incorporation on rice plant growth and nutrition[J]. Agronomy Journal, 1976, 68(5): 752-755.

[18]裴鵬剛, 張均華, 朱練峰, 等. 秸稈還田耦合施氮水平對水稻光合特性、 氮素吸收及產(chǎn)量形成的影響[J]. 中國水稻科學(xué), 2015, 29(3): 282-290.

Pei P G, Zhang J H, Zhu L F,etal. Effects of straw returning coupled with N application on rice photosynthetic characteristics, nitrogen uptake and grain yield formation[J]. Chinese Journal of Rice Science, 2015, 29(3): 282-290.

[19]徐國偉, 吳長付, 劉輝, 等. 麥秸還田及氮肥管理技術(shù)對水稻產(chǎn)量的影響[J]. 作物學(xué)報(bào), 2007, 33(2): 284-291.

Xu G W, Wu C F, Liu H,etal. Effects of wheat residue incorporation and nitrogen management techniques on formation of the grain yield of rice[J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2007, 33(2): 284-291.

[20]吳建富, 曾研華, 潘曉華, 等. 稻草還田方式對雙季水稻產(chǎn)量和土壤碳庫管理指數(shù)的影響[J]. 應(yīng)用生態(tài)學(xué)報(bào), 2013, 24(6): 1572-1578.

Wu J F, Zeng Y H, Pan X H,etal. Effects of rice straw returning mode on rice grain yield and soil carbon pool management index in double rice-cropping system[J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2013, 24(6): 1572-1578.

[21]趙峰, 程建平, 張國忠, 等. 氮肥運(yùn)籌和秸稈還田對直播稻氮素利用和產(chǎn)量的影響[J]. 湖北農(nóng)業(yè)科學(xué), 2011, 50(18): 3702-3704.

Zhao F, Chen J P, Zhang G Z,etal. Effect of nitrogen fertilizer regimes and returning straw on N availability and forming yield of direct-sowing rice[J]. Hubei Agricultural Science, 2011, 50(18): 3702-3704.

[22]張媛媛, 李建林, 王春宏, 姜佰文. 氮素和生物腐解劑調(diào)控下稻草還田對水稻氮素積累及產(chǎn)量的影響[J]. 土壤通報(bào), 2012, 43(2): 435-438.

Zhang Y Y, Li J L, Wang C H, Jiang B W. Effects of rice-straw return to field on nitrogen accumulation and yield of rice under the nitrogen manipulation and biological decomposing[J]. Chinese Journal of Soil Science, 2012, 43(2): 435-438.

[23]徐新宇, 張玉梅, 向華, 胡濟(jì)生. 應(yīng)用15N示蹤研究秸稈對保存和提高氮肥肥效的影響[J]. 中國核科技報(bào)告, 1991 (增刊3): 1-11.

Xu X Y, Zhang Y M, Xiang H, Hu J S. Effect of applying wheat stubble on preservation and utilization of N-fertilizer by15N trace technique[J]. China Nuclear Science & Technology Report, 1991 (Suppl.3): 1-11.

[24]田玉華, 賀發(fā)云, 尹斌, 朱兆良. 太湖地區(qū)氮磷肥施用對稻田氨揮發(fā)的影響[J]. 土壤學(xué)報(bào), 2007, 44(5): 893-899.

Tian Y H, He F Y, Yin B, Zhu Z L. Ammonia volatilization from paddy fields in the Taihu Lake region as affected by N and P combination in fertilization[J]. Acta Pedologica Sinica, 2007, 44(5): 893-899.

[25]Van Asten P J A, Van Bodegom P M, Mulder L M,etal. Effect of straw application on rice yields and nutrient availability on an alkaline and a pH-neutral soil in a Sahelian irrigation scheme[J]. Nutrient Cycling in Agroecosystems, 2005, 72(3): 255-266．

[26]錢海燕, 楊濱娟, 黃國勤, 等. 秸稈還田配施化肥及微生物菌劑對水田土壤酶活性和微生物數(shù)量的影響[J]. 生態(tài)環(huán)境學(xué)報(bào), 2012, 21(3): 440-445.

Qian H Y, Yang B J, Huang G Q,etal. Effects of returning rice straw to fields with fertilizers and microorganism liquids on soil enzyme activities and microorganisms in paddy fields[J]. Ecology and Environmental Sciences, 2012, 21(3): 440-445.

[27]Tang C, Sparling G P, McLay C D A. Effect of short-term legume residue decomposition on soil acidity[J]. Australian Journal of Soil Researeh,1999, 37: 561-573.

[28]蔣靜艷, 黃耀, 宗良綱. 水分管理與秸稈施用對稻田CH4和N2O排放的影響[J]. 中國環(huán)境科學(xué), 2003, 23(5): 552-556.

Jiang J Y, Huang Y, Zong L G. Influence of water controlling and straw application on CH4and N2O emissions from rice field[J]. China Environmental Science, 2003, 23(5): 552-556.

[29]王改玲, 郝明德, 陳德立. 秸稈還田對灌溉玉米田土壤反硝化及N2O排放的影響[J]. 植物營養(yǎng)與肥料學(xué)報(bào), 2006, 12(6): 840-844.

Wang G L, Hao M D, Chen D L. Effect of stubble incorporation and nitrogen fertilization on denitrification and nitrous oxide emission in an irrigated maize soil[J]. Plant Nutrition and Fertilizer Science, 2006, 12(6): 840-844.

[30]王德建, 林靜慧, 夏立忠. 太湖地區(qū)稻麥輪作農(nóng)田氮素淋洗特點(diǎn)[J]. 中國生態(tài)農(nóng)業(yè)學(xué)報(bào), 2001,9(1): 16-18.

Wang D J, Lin J H, Xia L Z. Characteristics of nitrogen leaching of rice-wheat rotation field in Taihu Lake area[J]. Chinese Journal of Eco-Agriculture, 2001, 9(1): 16-18.

[31]汪軍,王德建,張剛.秸稈還田下氮肥用量對稻田養(yǎng)分淋洗的影響[J].中國生態(tài)農(nóng)業(yè)學(xué)報(bào),2010,18(2): 316-321.

Wang J, Wang D J, Zhang G. Effect of incorporated straw-nitrogen fertilizer on nutrient leaching in paddy soils[J].Chinese Journal of Eco-Agriculture, 2010,18(2): 316-321.

[32]李宗新,董樹亭,王空軍,等.不同施肥條件下玉米田土壤養(yǎng)分淋溶規(guī)律的原位研究[J].應(yīng)用生態(tài)學(xué)報(bào),2008,19(1): 65-70.

Li Z X, Dong S T, Wang K J,etal. Soil nutrient leaching patterns in maize field under different fertilizations: An in situ study[J].Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2008, 19(1): 65-70.

[33]王德建,林靜慧,孫瑞娟,等.太湖地區(qū)稻麥高產(chǎn)的氮肥適宜用量及其對地下水的影響[J].土壤學(xué)報(bào),2003,40(3): 426-432.

Wang D J, Lin J H, Sun R J,etal. Optimum nitrogen rate for a high productive rice-wheat system and its impact on the groundwater in the Taihu area[J]. Acta Pedologica Sinica, 2003, 40(3): 426-432.

Effects of straw incorporation plus nitrogen fertilizer on rice yield, nitrogen use efficiency and nitrogen loss

ZHANG Gang1,2,3, WANG De-jian2, YU Yuan-chun1,3*, WANG Can2， ZHUANG Jin-gui2

(1CollegeofBiologyandtheEnvironment,NanjingForestryUniversity,Nanjing210037,China;2InstituteofSoilScience,ChineseAcademyofSciences,Nanjing210008,China;3Co-InnovationCenterfortheSustainableForestryinSouthernChina,NanjingForestryUniversity,Nanjing210037,China)

【Objectives】 Exploration of the theory and technology of N application along with total straw incorporation has great significance for raising rice yield and N use efficiency, alleviating nitrogen pollution in rice production in China.【Methods】 A split plot field experiment was conducted using monolith lysimeter with a local rice Nanjing 46 as material in Changshu Agro-ecological Experimental Station, Jiangsu Province, China from 2009 to 2011. The main plot was total wheat straw incorporation (S) and no straw incorporation (S0); the sub-plots were four N rates: 120 kg/hm2(N1), 180 kg/hm2(N2), 240 kg/hm2(N3) and 300 kg/hm2(N4), with no N application as control (CK). The amount of ammonia volatilization, total N contents in leachate and soil, the N contents in straw in different growth periods and grains were determined, the rice yields were investigated.【Results】 The rice yield was increased with the increasing of N application rate. Compared with no straw incorporation treatments, the average rice yields of S+N treatments were increased by 6.3%, and the highest yield was obtained in SN3 treatment. N use efficiencies were declined with the increasing of N rates in rice reason, which could be enhanced by straw incorporation. Agronomic N efficiency and N apparent recovery in S+N treatments were all higher than those of N treatments by 1.4-3.4 kg/kg and 1.8%-4.2% respectively. With the increasing of N application rate, the amount of N residual, ammonia volatilization and N leaching in paddy field increased. Compared with no straw incorporation, the amount of ammonia volatilization and N residual in paddy field with straw incorporation was increased by 18.2% and 10.1 kg/hm2respectively at N application rate of 240 kg/hm2, and the N leaching and total N loss were reduced by 30.9% and 6.0% respectively.【Conclusions】 Under the straw completely incorporation, optimum N application rate could increase the N efficiency and rice yield, reduce the total N loss. In this research, the wheat straw incorporation with N application of 240 kg/hm2is the optimal mode.

straw incorporation; nitrogen application rate; nitrogen use efficiency; nitrogen loss; rice yield

2015-04-17接受日期: 2015-07-22網(wǎng)絡(luò)出版日期： 2016-05-23

江蘇省農(nóng)業(yè)科技自主創(chuàng)新資金項(xiàng)目“區(qū)域秸稈全量利用關(guān)鍵技術(shù)研究與項(xiàng)目推廣”[CX(12)1002] ； “十二五”國家科技支撐資助項(xiàng)目(2012BAJ24B06)； 國家自然科學(xué)基金項(xiàng)目(31270664)； 江蘇省普通高校研究生科研創(chuàng)新計(jì)劃項(xiàng)目(KYLX15_09)資助。

張剛(1980—)， 男， 山東新泰人， 博士， 助理研究員， 主要從事土壤、 農(nóng)業(yè)生態(tài)環(huán)境方面的研究。E-mail: gzhang@issas.ac.cn

E-mail: ycyu@njfu.edu.cn

S511.062.01

A

1008-505X(2016)04-0877-09