Tachycardia-induced Cardiomyopathy
Tachycardia-induced cardiomyopathy(T-CM)refers to the presence of a reversible LV dysfunction solely due to increase in ventricular rates, regardless of tachycardia origin. The risk of developing T-CM depends not only on the type, but also the duration and rate of tachycardia. A study reported T-CM in 2.7%patients referred for radiofrequency ablation(RFA);however,it also included patients referred for premature ventricular contractions ablation. T-CM has been reported in 10% of patients with atrial tachycardia(AT), and as high as 37% of patients with incessant AT. Moreover, permanent junctional reciprocating tachycardia appears to have the highest association with T-CM(20% to 50%)as it frequently presents as an incessant supraventricular tachycardia.
Animal models have been key to understand the pathophysiology and mechanism of T-CM. Similar to humans,animals exposed to persistent tachycardia using a continuous rapid atrial or ventricular pacing develop heart failure (HF)symptoms, left ventricular(LV)systolic dysfunction and dilatation, decrease in LV dP/dtmax and myocardial blood flow,and increase in LV wall stress and end-diastolic pressure and volume.Dilatation tends to be biventricular with mild thinning or no associated hypertrophy or change in heart mass. The progression of these physiological changes include a decrease in systemic blood pressure and increase in LV and pulmonary artery pressure, which plateaus at 1 week, while cardiac output, ejection fraction, and volumes continue to deteriorate the following 4 weeks with development of symptomatic HF within 2 to 3 weeks.
T-CM is characterized by structural and functional myocardial changes. Similar to human studies, T-CM models have also demonstrated electrical remodeling and abnormal Ca homeostasis thought to be responsible for impaired excitation-contraction coupling and diastolic dysfunction. Only total Ca cycling, Ca channel inhibition,and basal ATPase activity have demonstrated a statistical correlation with decrease in left ventricular ejection fraction(LVEF).
Clinical studies have found a variable time from onset of arrhythmia symptoms to development of T-CM,ranging from 3 to 120 days with an overall LVEF of 32%. Regardless of tachyarrhythmia, HF symptoms will manifest earlier at higher tachycardia rates, such as patients with persistent atrial flutter or tachycardia with 2:1 AV conduction with rates >150 beats/min.A recent clinical study found a more severe LV dysfunction(LVEF 29.3±6.6%)in T-CM when compared with dilated and inflammatory CM (32.1±10.2% and 41.9±12.9%,respectively;P<0.001)
Major reported symptoms include palpitations(29%), HF class Ⅲto Ⅳ(47%), and syncope/presyncope(12%), while the remaining may have no symptoms. Sudden cardiac death is uncommon but has been reported in up to 8%to 12%despite treatment and resolution of cardiomyopathy.
Echocardiogram or cardiac magnetic resonance can assist in excluding other etiologies. T-CM is characterized by a dilated CM (increased LV end-diastolic dimension and area)with moderate to severe biventricular systolic dysfunction and normal LV septal and posterior wall thickness (lack of hypertrophy). Mitral insufficiency may be present due to LV and mitral annular dilatation with lack of leaflet coaptation.
A major feature of T-CM is its reversibility once tachycardia is eliminated. Thus, the mainstay treatment consists of suppression of tachycardia based on the culprit arrhythmia1with antiarrhythmic drugs(AADs)and/or RFA.
Elimination of tachyarrhythmia not only resolves LV function within 4 to 12 weeks, but also improves heart failure symptoms by at least 1 New York Heart Association functional class in most patients.Unfortunately, the recovery of T-CM is not always complete. Histopathological abnormalities, diastolic dysfunction, and ventricular dilatation with a hypertrophic response may persist despite normalization of LVEF.
Premature ventricular contractions-cardiomyopathy(PVC-CM)is defined as the development of LV dysfunction caused solely by frequent PVCs. A PVC burden≥10% is often considered high and significant enough to trigger PVC-CM.The prevalence of PVC-CM has been reported at 7% among patients with frequent PVC burden >10%. Clinical studies have reported a diagnosis of PVC-CM in 9%to 30%of patients referred for RFA of PVC.
The primary cause of contractile dysfunction in PVC-CM appears to be disorders of the calcium-induced calcium release mechanism itself,with alterations of dyad(L-type Ca channel and Ryanodine receptor)function proposed as a potential mechanism.Similar to other cardiomyopathies, this PVC-CM model has revealed electrophysiological remodeling.Histopathological abnormalities are distinct without evidence of increased inflammation or apoptosis and minimal or no fibrosis. Mitochondrial studies have demonstrated no changes in oxidative phosphorylation.These findings are supported clinically by the lack of scar on cardiac magnetic resonance imaging of patients with PVC-CM.These findings further confirm a primary functional abnormality as a primary mechanism of this reversible CM. Whether all the cellular and molecular changes are in response to the CM rather than the cause of the CM remains unclear.
PVC burden has been shown to be a major predictor of PVC-CM. Two main studies have shown that PVC burden >16% and 24% best identifies patients with a diagnosis of PVC-CM. Although these and other studies suggest that a PVC burden of at least 10% is required to induce PVC-CM, other studies question this minimal PVC threshold,because they have shown improvement in LV function with PVC burden as low as 6% to 8% . The length of ambulatory ECG monitoring has important implications, because increasing the duration from a 24-h to a 7-day ambulatory Holter monitor can doubled the number of patients who reach the 10%threshold.
Some other PVC features have been found to be independent predictors for PVC-CM such as male sex,lack of symptoms or duration of palpitations >30 months, variability of PVC coupling interval, QRS duration of PVC >150 ms, and epicardial origin.PVC-CM index2, including PVC burden, PVC-QRS width, and epicardial origin, has been developed in an attempt to identify patients with high probability of PVC-CM.
The time course for the development of PVC-CM is unclear, but it is estimated to occur within months up to several years. Although animal studies with persistent high PVC burden(33% to 50%)develop CM within 4 weeks, human studies are not consistent in part due to the unclear onset and variability of PVCs.
Table 1 Clinical and PVC Features to Identify PVC-CM
PVC-CM may have a wide range of presentations,from asymptomatic or vague symptomatology to heart failure and even syncope. It is unclear why some patients have symptoms related to PVCs while others do not, but a PVC coupling interval ratio <0.5 (PVC CI ratio: PVC coupling interval/Sinus coupling interval)has been proposed as an important marker of symptoms.
PVC-CM is a diagnosis of exclusion, to be suspected in patients with frequent PVCs >10% ,especially in nonischemic CM.A challenge is to identify when PVCs are the etiology of a CM or just "innocent bystanders" in patients with CM. Even if PVCs are the result of CM, these PVCs, if frequent, may contribute to and further worsen CM and HF symptoms; this is referred to as "superimposed" PVC-CM. In selected cases, echocardiographic and PVC features can help identify these patients (Table 1). PVC-CM is characterized by mild to moderate LV systolic dysfunction,LV dilatation,mild mitral regurgitation,and LA enlargement, which resolved within 2 to 12 weeks after elimination of PVCs. Cardiac imaging is key to identify LV dysfunction and prompt suspicion of PVC-CM in patients with high PVC burden(≥10%)(Table 1). Cardiac magnetic resonance with lategadolinium enhancement has the advantage of identifying scar and quantifying scar burden, which in turn potentially predicts the response to PVC suppression.
Currently,a PVC suppression strategy with RFA or AADs is a widely accepted intervention to treat a CM that might be caused or exacerbated by frequent PVCs.However, the treatment of frequent PVCs(≥10%burden)without LV dysfunction (LVEF ≥50%),symptoms, or idiopathic ventricular fibrillation is less clear. PVC suppression is considered successful if burden is decreased by >80% of baseline PVCs, as it likely represents a true effect of treatment rather than spontaneous PVC variability.
PVC suppression in PVC-CM has been shown to improve LV function,LV dilatation,mitral regurgitation,and BNP levels. The mean improvement of LVEF after RFA in most studies is between 10% and 15% even in superimposed PVC-CM. A prospective study demonstrated a significant decrease in BNP levels while primary prophylaxis ICD implantation was avoided in 80% of all patients with PVC burden >13% due to significant improvement of LVEF after successful RFA.Another study found that 81%of patients with abnormal baseline estimated glomerular filtration rate had significant improvement in renal function after RFA of PVCs.
Pathophysiology n.病理生理學(xué)
leaflet n.&v.瓣葉,散頁(yè)印刷品,傳單,小冊(cè)子;散發(fā)傳單
coaptation n.對(duì)合,接合,適應(yīng)
histopathological adj.組織病理學(xué)的
apoptosis n.細(xì)胞凋亡,程序性細(xì)胞死亡
mitochondrial adj.線粒體的
oxidative adj.氧化的,具有氧化特性的
phosphorylation n.磷酸化
implication n. 含意,暗指,牽連,牽涉
vague adj.模糊的,微小的,不明確的,不具體的
symptomatology n. 癥狀學(xué),癥候?qū)W
innocent adj.無(wú)辜的,清白的,無(wú)罪的,無(wú)辜受害的;n.無(wú)辜者,單純的人
superimpose v.疊加,疊映,使重疊
注 釋
1.culprit arrhythmia 本文中指導(dǎo)致心肌病的心律失常,culprit在冠心病心肌梗死介入治療中常譯作“罪犯”,在此可譯作“致病”,即致病心律失常。
2.PVC-CM index 指PVC-CM 指數(shù),由PVC 負(fù)荷(0-1)×PVC-QRS 寬度(毫秒)×常數(shù)C(結(jié)構(gòu)性心臟疾病為1.28,心電圖提示心外膜起源為2)計(jì)算所得,≥39 分預(yù)測(cè)發(fā)生心肌病的風(fēng)險(xiǎn)高。
參考譯文
第92 課 心律失常所致心肌病心動(dòng)過(guò)速所致心肌病
心動(dòng)過(guò)速所致心肌病(T-CM)是指因心室率加快而引起的可逆性左心室功能不全,不考慮心動(dòng)過(guò)速的起源。發(fā)生T-CM 的風(fēng)險(xiǎn)不但取決于心動(dòng)過(guò)速的類(lèi)型,也取決于心動(dòng)過(guò)速的頻率和持續(xù)時(shí)間。有報(bào)道T-CM 占射頻消融患者的2.7%。不過(guò),這包含行室性期前收縮消融的患者。據(jù)報(bào)道10%的房性心動(dòng)過(guò)速患者發(fā)生T-CM,這在頑固性房性心動(dòng)過(guò)速患者高達(dá)37%。此外,持續(xù)性結(jié)性折返型心動(dòng)過(guò)速因其常為頑固性室上性心動(dòng)過(guò)速,T-CM 的發(fā)生率最高(20%~50%)。
病理生理與機(jī)制
動(dòng)物模型是了解T-CM 病理生理和機(jī)制的關(guān)鍵。與人類(lèi)相似,連續(xù)心房或心室起搏引起的持續(xù)性心動(dòng)過(guò)速可誘發(fā)動(dòng)物心力衰竭癥狀、左心室收縮功能不全和擴(kuò)張,降低左心室dP/dtmax 和心肌血流,增加左心室室壁張力、舒張末壓力和容量。心臟擴(kuò)張涉及雙心室,伴輕微室壁變薄或不伴肥厚或心臟質(zhì)量變化。這些生理學(xué)變化的進(jìn)展包括動(dòng)脈血壓降低、左心室和肺動(dòng)脈壓增加,一周時(shí)這些變化達(dá)到穩(wěn)定,而心搏出量、左心室射血分?jǐn)?shù)(LVEF)和容量在隨后的4 周繼續(xù)惡化,在2~3 周內(nèi)即出現(xiàn)心力衰竭癥狀。
T-CM 特征表現(xiàn)為心肌結(jié)構(gòu)和功能變化。與人類(lèi)相似,T-CM 模型也證實(shí)電重構(gòu)和鈣穩(wěn)態(tài)異常,認(rèn)為這導(dǎo)致了興奮-收縮偶聯(lián)障礙和舒張功能異常。已證實(shí)只有總鈣循環(huán)、鈣通道抑制和基礎(chǔ)ATP 酶活性與LVEF 降低存在統(tǒng)計(jì)學(xué)意義的關(guān)聯(lián)。
臨床表現(xiàn)、診斷和圖像特征
臨床研究發(fā)現(xiàn)從心律失常癥狀到發(fā)生T-CM 的時(shí)間變化不一,從3d 到120d,總體上LVEF 為32%。除了快速型心律失常,較快速率的心動(dòng)過(guò)速如持續(xù)性心房撲動(dòng)或2:1 順傳室率>150 次/min 的心動(dòng)過(guò)速較早出現(xiàn)心力衰竭癥狀。近期臨床研究發(fā)現(xiàn),與擴(kuò)張型心肌病或炎癥性心肌病[分別為(32.1±10.2)%和(41.9±12.9)%]相比,左心室功能不全更為嚴(yán)重[LVEF(29.3±6.6)%]。
主要癥狀包括心悸(29%),心功能Ⅲ到Ⅳ級(jí)(47%),暈厥或先兆暈厥(12%),其余為無(wú)癥狀。猝死不常見(jiàn),但有報(bào)道盡管心肌病得到治療并緩解,仍然達(dá)到8%~12%。
心臟超聲或心臟磁共振檢查有助于排除其他病因。T-CM 特征表現(xiàn)為擴(kuò)張性心肌病(左心室舒張末徑和面積增大)、中到重度雙心室收縮功能障礙、左心室間隔和后壁厚度正常(無(wú)肥厚)。由于左心室和二尖瓣環(huán)增大瓣尖閉合不佳而出現(xiàn)二尖瓣關(guān)閉不全。
治療
T-CM 的主要特征隨心動(dòng)過(guò)速消除而逆轉(zhuǎn)。因此,治療重點(diǎn)是基于致病心律失常用抗心律失常藥物或射頻消融手術(shù)抑制心動(dòng)過(guò)速。
消除快速心律失常不但可以在4~12 周內(nèi)恢復(fù)左心室功能,而且多數(shù)患者至少可改善心力衰竭癥狀達(dá)NYHA 1級(jí)。遺憾的是T-CM 不總能完全恢復(fù)。盡管LVEF 正常了,組織病理異常、舒張功能不全及伴隨肥大反應(yīng)的心室擴(kuò)張會(huì)持續(xù)存在。
室性期前收縮所致心肌病
室性期前收縮所致心肌?。≒VC-CM)是指頻發(fā)PVC 引起的左心室功能不全。通常認(rèn)為PVC 負(fù)荷≥10%時(shí)足以引起PVC-CM。有報(bào)道PVC 負(fù)荷>10%的患者PVC-CM 的發(fā)生率為7%。臨床研究發(fā)現(xiàn)行PVC 射頻消融的患者中9%到30%診斷為PVC-CM。
PVC-CM 的潛在機(jī)制
PVC-CM 收縮功能不全的主要原因是鈣誘導(dǎo)的鈣釋放機(jī)制的自身異常,潛在的機(jī)制是dyad(L 型鈣通道和雷諾定受體)功能改變。類(lèi)似于其他心肌病,PVC-CM 模型揭示電生理重構(gòu)。組織病理學(xué)異常確無(wú)炎癥或凋亡增加的依據(jù),輕微或無(wú)纖維化。 線粒體研究證實(shí)無(wú)氧化磷酸化變化。臨床PVC-CM 患者磁共振心臟顯像缺乏疤痕支持這些發(fā)現(xiàn)。這些發(fā)現(xiàn)進(jìn)一步證實(shí)這種可逆性心肌病的主要發(fā)病機(jī)制為原發(fā)心功能異常。是否所有細(xì)胞和分子變化是對(duì)心肌病的反應(yīng)抑或是心肌病的原因尚不清楚。
PVC-CM 的預(yù)測(cè)指標(biāo)
PVC 負(fù)荷已成為預(yù)測(cè)PVC-CM 的主要指標(biāo)。兩大研究顯示PVC 負(fù)荷>16%和>24%能很好的鑒別出PVC-CM 的患者。盡管這些及其他研究提示要誘發(fā)PVC-CM,PVC 負(fù)荷至少達(dá)10%,其他研究對(duì)這最小的PVC 負(fù)荷提出質(zhì)疑,因?yàn)樗麄冏C實(shí)PVC 負(fù)荷低至6%到8%的患者處理后左心室功能得到改善。動(dòng)態(tài)心電圖監(jiān)測(cè)時(shí)長(zhǎng)具有重要價(jià)值,因?yàn)閷⒈O(jiān)測(cè)時(shí)間從24h 延長(zhǎng)至7d,達(dá)到10%閾值(即負(fù)荷值達(dá)10%)的患者數(shù)量倍增。
發(fā)現(xiàn)能獨(dú)立預(yù)測(cè)PVC-CM 的一些其他PVC 特征有男性、缺乏癥狀或心悸超過(guò)30 個(gè)月、PVC 聯(lián)律間期多變、PVC QRS 間期>150 ms 及心外膜起源。 PVC-CM 指數(shù),包括PVC 負(fù)荷、PVC-QRS 寬度和心外膜起源,已形成以期鑒別PVC-CM 高發(fā)可能性的患者。
臨床表現(xiàn)、診斷和影響特征
尚不清楚發(fā)生PVC-CM 需多長(zhǎng)時(shí)間。估計(jì)發(fā)生在數(shù)月至數(shù)年間。雖然動(dòng)物研究持續(xù)高負(fù)荷(33%至50%)PVC 4 周內(nèi)誘發(fā)心肌病,人類(lèi)研究并不一致,部分原因?yàn)椴恢狿VC 何時(shí)開(kāi)始以及它的可變性。
PVC-CM 表現(xiàn)形式寬泛,從無(wú)癥狀到或輕微癥狀到心力衰竭甚至?xí)炟?。尚不清楚為什么有些患者出現(xiàn)PVC 相關(guān)癥狀而另外的不出現(xiàn),不過(guò),已認(rèn)為PVC 聯(lián)律間期比<0.5(PVC 聯(lián)律間期比:PVC 聯(lián)律間期/竇律聯(lián)律間期)是癥狀的重要標(biāo)志。
PVC-CM 是一排他性診斷,對(duì)于PVC>10%的患者要考慮,特別是非缺血性心肌病。面臨的挑戰(zhàn)是對(duì)于心肌病患者,PVC 是心肌病的病因還是“無(wú)辜的旁觀者”。即使PVC 是心肌病所致,這些PVC 如果頻發(fā),可促進(jìn)或進(jìn)一步惡化心肌病和心力衰竭癥狀,這稱(chēng)作“疊加型”P(pán)VC-CM。在選擇性病例,心超和PVC 特征有助于鑒別這些患者(表1)。PVC-CM 特征為輕中度左心室收縮功能異常、左心室擴(kuò)大、輕度二尖瓣反流、和左心房擴(kuò)大,這些會(huì)在消除PVC 后2 至12 周內(nèi)得到緩解。心臟影像在鑒別高負(fù)荷PVC(≥10%)患者左心室功能不全及考慮PVC-CM 中起到關(guān)鍵作用(表1)。心臟磁共振延遲釓強(qiáng)化有益于識(shí)別疤痕并定量分析疤痕負(fù)荷,這反過(guò)來(lái)可預(yù)測(cè)對(duì)PVC 抑制的反應(yīng)。
治療
當(dāng)前,采用射頻消融術(shù)或抗心律失常藥物抑制PVC 的方案已成為治療PVC 誘發(fā)或加重心肌病的廣為接受的干預(yù)方法。不過(guò),對(duì)于不伴左心室功能不全、癥狀、或特發(fā)性心室顫動(dòng)的頻發(fā)PVC(負(fù)荷≥10%)治療尚不清晰。認(rèn)為當(dāng)PVC 較基礎(chǔ)狀態(tài)下降80%以上時(shí)治療是成功的,這反映治療的正真作用而非PVC 自發(fā)變異。
PVC-CM 抑制PVC 能改善左心室功能、左心室擴(kuò)張、二尖瓣反流和BNP 濃度。多數(shù)研究表明射頻消融后LVEF 的改善平均達(dá)10%~15%,即使疊加的PVC-CM 也如此。一項(xiàng)前瞻性研究證實(shí)所有PVC 負(fù)荷>13%的患者在成功射頻消融后BNP 水平顯著下降,由于LVEF 明顯改善而使80%患者免于預(yù)防性植入ICD。另一研究發(fā)現(xiàn)81%有基礎(chǔ)估測(cè)腎小球?yàn)V過(guò)率異常的患者,在PVC 射頻消融后腎功能得以明顯改善。
表1 鑒別PVC-CM 的臨床和PVC 特征